Video & Transcript Research : 'Texas Family Code'

Page 65 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 28th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd also like to add that currently, in Texas Family Code, the onus is on the parent to ensure informed
  • So I'd love to talk about informed consent and all the Texas codes surrounding that.
  • I urge you, for the sake of families across Texas, to support House Bill 3708.
  • More Texas families are welcoming their babies into the world out of a hospital setting.
  • Our system works for Texas families. Trust it. That is why so many are choosing it.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 19, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Marriage, family, and children are the cornerstone of our society.
  • > strong With strong families come strong With strong families come strong communities,<00:35:
  • <00:37:29.040> court significant reduction in family court significant reduction in family
  • <00:41:01.680> those every Wyoming family, especially those every Wyoming family, especially
  • <01:07:04.079> with people on fixed incomes, families with people on fixed incomes, families
Bills: SF0099, SF0116, SJ0006
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/25/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • across the county to help families across the county to help families experiencing<00:02:26.840>
  • and families experiencing homelessness and families at<00:02:28.280> risk<00:02:28.560> of
  • their families in these schools. their families in these schools.
  • in meeting the needs of these families. in meeting the needs of these families.
  • price families out of care.
Bills: HF4561, HF4343
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services, 907 KAR 1595, 1835, Emergency
  • Staying with Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Community Based Services, 922 KAR
Summary: The subcommittee approved the minutes from the previous meeting and then took up several regulations. The first was a Department of Veterans Affairs regulation, with a staff amendment, to allow nurse practitioners to apply for the Veterans Affairs nurse loan repayment program year-round and to make technical drafting changes. The committee heard from the Office of Kentucky Veteran Centers, then adopted the staff amendment and approved the regulation without objection. The main item of the meeting was the Board of Optometric Examiners’ proposed amendment to 201 KAR 5:010, which would allow applicants to use the Optometry Examining Board of Canada written exam in place of part one of the National Board of Examiners in Optometry exam for licensure. The board said the change would improve access to care, provide an additional pathway for Canadian-trained candidates, and still require applicants to pass the remaining national board parts. Opponents, including NBEO officials, ARBO, Pearson VUE, and several optometrists, argued the Canadian exam is not equivalent, does not test the same biomedical science content, is not validated for U.S. scope of practice, and raises concerns about test security, transparency, and portability across states. They urged the committee to find the amendment deficient or vote no. Committee members questioned both sides about prior communication with the board, whether Kentucky would be the first state to adopt such a change, the rationale for the proposal, and the cost difference between the exams. Supporters said the board had received some written comments and one phone call, and that the proposal was driven by access concerns and the presence of Canadian students. Opponents said they had not had direct discussions with the Kentucky board before the hearing. No final vote on the optometry regulation is reflected in the transcript excerpt, but the committee heard extensive testimony and rebuttal before moving on.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Healthcare Committee Jan 28th, 2026

Healthcare

Transcript Highlights:
  • Alabamians deserve emergency care that meets a minimum standard, no matter what their zip code.
  • > minimum standard no matter what their minimum standard no matter what their zip<00:29:32.559> code
  • so<00:29:33.600> we<00:29:33.840> respectfully<00:29:34.559> urge zip code
  • And so we respectfully urge zip code.
  • If you're unsure about anything I've said today, I'd encourage you to call the family member you thought
Bills: SB63, SB80, SB63, SB80
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Executive Director: Section 55074, 57113, and 57140 of the Government Code.
  • It cites the code construction and refers to three... ...211.011 of the code construction.
  • I serve as Deputy Comptroller at the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
  • The Texas Register.
  • comes from Chapter 3 of the Local Government Code.
Summary: The meeting focused on the Texas Ethics Commission's (TEC) evaluation of legislative recommendations and personnel updates, including the appointment of a new general counsel and discussions about upcoming quarterly meetings. Commissioner Schmidt reported on the progress of various bills, including amendments to existing laws, the need for increased regulation on foreign lobbying, and the publication of new rules in the Texas Register. Public testimonies were heard regarding compliance issues and proposed changes in political contribution regulations. The Commission agreed to schedule further review on the legislative items discussed and the proposed rule amendments.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education Mar 27th, 2025

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's a completely separate portion of the Texas Education Code. So the answer is no. Correct.
  • There are separate sections of the Texas Education Code.
  • So this would establish Texas Education Code Chapter 30B.
  • Thank you for your time and for fighting for the families, children, and small businesses of Texas.
  • HB117 presents an opportunity to strengthen Texas... ...businesses, empower families, and advance a more
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Mar 11th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Utilizing state funds, ESAs will allow participating Texas families to pay for a range of educational
  • They can use their funds as allowed by the Texas Education Code and such. They're not.
  • state of Texas.
  • Maybe not wealthy but wealthier than average families here in Texas, that what you're going to see is
  • John's families.
Bills: HB 3
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/05/2026 - Senate Finance

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair and members, Senate Bill 1638 conforms Arizona's tax statutes to the Internal Revenue Code as of
  • 12:50 p.m., clarifies the retroactive application of the updated definition of the Internal Revenue Code
  • 12:50 p.m., clarifies the retroactive application of the updated definition of the Internal Revenue Code
  • a standard practice, as we've discussed before, of always saying conform to this newest year's tax code
  • They are generally people who have families, who have kids, and they're trying to support those families
Bills: SB1638
Summary: The Senate Finance Committee took up SB 1638, a tax conformity bill that would update Arizona’s tax code to the Internal Revenue Code as of January 1, 2026 and incorporate federal changes from 2025. The bill also included individual income tax subtractions for tips, overtime, seniors, and auto loan interest, along with changes to the standard deduction and charitable contribution deduction. Committee discussion focused heavily on whether Arizona should conform broadly to federal changes or limit the bill to more targeted, temporary provisions. Two amendments were considered. The chair’s amendment was described as clarifying only, addressing retroactivity and foreign dividend language, and it was adopted. Senator Epstein’s amendment would have removed the broader conformity provisions and the modified charitable deduction, limited the standard deduction change to tax year 2025, and kept the individual subtractions; she argued the business-related conformity items mainly benefited corporations and should be negotiated in the budget. Opponents said the amendment would create unnecessary recalculations and uncertainty for taxpayers and businesses, while supporters of the underlying bill said conformity was needed quickly to match Department of Revenue forms and avoid filing-season confusion. Epstein’s amendment failed. Public testimony split along similar lines. Business and tax group representatives supported prompt conformity, saying taxpayers and small businesses needed certainty and that the department’s forms should be codified. Opponents argued the bill would reduce state revenue substantially and mainly benefit higher-income taxpayers and corporations, while diverting money from education, child care, and health care. After debate, the committee voted to move SB 1638 as amended with a do-pass recommendation, passing it by about 4-3, and then adjourned.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hill, Texas Association of Builders.
  • It's already mandated by code.
  • Although the Texas Constitution imposes constitutional spending limits on the Texas Legislature, current
  • Where I live, we're one of the safest communities in North Texas, with the lowest tax rate in North Texas
  • It is a common-sense safeguard that reflects the reality facing Texas families.
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Finance Aug 15th, 2025

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It’s a combination of elimination of the STAAR test and the Texas A through F, excuse me, eliminating
  • : the beginning of the year, middle of the year, and end of the year testing, and also strengthens Texas
  • It’s a combination of elimination of the STAAR test and the Texas A through F, excuse me, eliminating
  • : the beginning of the year, middle of the year, and end of the year testing, and also strengthens Texas
Bills: SB2, SB3, SB5, SB9, SB10, SB14, SB16, SB34, SB18
Summary: The Senate Committee on Finance met in the second special session and considered a series of bills, mostly related to flood response, water infrastructure, taxation, school accountability, property fraud, and legislative procedure. Senator Zaffirini presented SB 18 on TCEQ permit exemptions for certain erosion, floodwater, and sediment control dams or reservoirs; Senator Perry presented SB 2 on flood relief preparedness, SB 14 on credit impact fees and water supply/conservation incentives, and SB 5 on Hill Country relief funding; Senator Bettencourt presented SB 3 on early warning flood sirens, SB 9 on replacing STAAR with three annual tests and strengthening A-F accountability, and SB 10 on lowering the rollback tax rate from 3.5% to 2.5%; Senator West presented SB 16 on property transaction ID requirements and new real property theft/fraud offenses; and Chair Huffman laid out SB 34, which changes legislative witness immunity rules from transactional immunity to testimonial immunity consistent with federal law. The committee also heard brief explanations that several bills were the same as versions previously passed by the Senate or committee, and there was limited public testimony, with no witnesses on most bills and only position cards on SB 16. Senator West raised a concern on SB 10 about a possible carve-out for police pay raises, but Senator Bettencourt said no change would be made at that time. For SB 34, Chair Huffman explained the bill would still allow compelled testimony before the legislature but would no longer provide blanket immunity, while preserving the right to counsel. The committee voted favorably on all bills considered. SB 18, SB 2, SB 14, SB 3, SB 16, SB 5, and SB 34 were reported out unanimously or near-unanimously, while SB 9 passed 10-1 and SB 10 passed 8-3. At the end of the meeting, Senator West requested to be shown voting nay on SB 9, and the chair granted unanimous consent. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Charlotte Mulder with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. There you go.
  • Charlotte Mulder with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.
  • Texas. Pretty good. Outstanding. Outstanding.
  • Under the Texas Official Oppression Act, the Texas Attorney General is authorized to take legal action
  • I'm trying to think through, it's one thing for Texas to pass laws that apply to Texas, but the subjective
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas Values is the family policy council for Texas, and we joined a coalition of about 40 other similar
  • At Equality Texas, we believe that all students deserve to see themselves and their families reflected
  • Using trans and intersex people as political pawns is anti-Texas, is anti-American; it betrays the Texas
  • The false and rigid definition of sex that this bill is trying to impose throughout Texas code would
  • for faith, family, and freedom.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas Values is the Family Policy Council for Texas, and we joined...
  • Texas Values is the Family Policy Council for Texas, and we join a coalition of about 40 other similar
  • Eight-year-old Alani Walton, from Temple, Texas, came back from a trip with her family and started using
  • It betrays the Texas spirit of fairness and freedom my family has been a part of for five generations
  • It betrays the Texas spirit of fairness and freedom my family has been a part of for five generations
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to verify users are 18 or older before allowing account creation. Invited witnesses in support, including Mary Elizabeth Castle and David Dunmoyer, argued the bill would protect children from harmful algorithms, addictive design, bullying, sexual exploitation, and mental health harms, and emphasized parental rights and the idea that minors should not enter binding contracts with platforms. Committee members questioned them about how algorithms work, whether parents could realistically monitor content, and whether the bill would still allow educational use; the witnesses said the bill was narrowly aimed at harmful social media use and not educational content. Public testimony on HB 186 was largely in opposition, though several student witnesses said they supported the bill’s goals but wanted the age lowered to 16 or the bill amended to allow parental consent or joint accounts. Opponents argued the bill would be ineffective because teens could bypass age checks, would cut off access to educational tools, school communications, recruiting and NIL opportunities, and would burden free speech and privacy. Some witnesses also said social media helps teens with mental health, community, and creative or professional opportunities, while others warned the bill could disproportionately harm disabled and marginalized users. After public testimony closed, HB 186 was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 5138, which Chairman Hughes said would respond to a court ruling limiting the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes unless invited by local prosecutors by changing the statute to require AG prosecution. Public testimony on HB 5138 was brief and opposed by at least one witness who argued it would further erode local control and expand state preemption. The bill was left pending after testimony. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 3225, a library bill aimed at keeping sexually explicit books and materials out of children’s sections in municipal libraries and requiring age verification for checkout, including digital access, with parental consent and other revisions added in the House. Supporters said the bill would protect children from explicit material and keep such content in adult sections, while opponents argued it would amount to censorship, be costly and difficult to implement, and could be used to target LGBTQ+ or other marginalized content. Library workers, parents, students, and advocates testified that existing library sections already separate age-appropriate materials and that the bill could reduce access to books, burden libraries, and infringe on parental choice and free expression.