Video & Transcript Research : 'hate speech'
Page 64 of 303
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- And so I hate to come to a campus and say, hey, four years ago when we started this process, you were
- And I hate to say it, and just for those who don't know, **San Antonio** is made up of a bunch of school
- And I hate to say that, but it'd be naive not to, right? So it's just really interesting.
- At the last board of managers, there were speech-language pathologists there to address the mass-firing
- of speech-language pathologists.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (04/16/2025)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Representative, I hate to interrupt you, but the bill we have in front of us is about... correct.
- Representative, I I hate council at all.
- Representative, I I hate to<00:47:34.079>
interrupt <00:47:34.400>you, <00:47:34.480> - Which therapy should I choose, speech, OT, or counseling?
- Which therapy should I choose, speech, OT, or counseling?
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Executive Departments and Administration (03/18/2026)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, public human services always tries to help me out by making these long speeches.
- I'm happy I would hate to give inaccurate information doing it from memory.
- I'm happy I would hate to give inaccurate information doing it from memory.
- I'm happy I would hate to give inaccurate information doing it from memory.
- I'm happy I would hate to give inaccurate information doing it from memory.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (04/16/2026)
Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- understand as legislators you have to navigate that challenging situation where you don't want to hate
- understand as legislators you have to navigate that challenging situation where you don't want to hate
- understand as legislators you have to navigate that challenging situation where you don't want to hate
- Um, I am a woman of short speeches, right? So, I usually cut right to the chase.
- , Um, I I am a a woman of short speeches, Um, I I am a a woman of short speeches, right?
Summary:
The committee held a public hearing on Senate Bill 562, which would create a home damage mitigation and resilience grant program aimed at helping homeowners make property improvements that could reduce insurance costs and non-renewals. Commissioner DJ Bettencourt of the New Hampshire Insurance Department explained that the program is modeled in part on Alabama’s safer homes program, but tailored for New Hampshire hazards such as floods, microbursts, heavy snow, ice, and falling trees. He said the grants would be limited to primary residences, subject to a means test, capped at $10,000, and intended to help homeowners make targeted improvements such as roof fortification or tree removal that could improve underwriting outcomes and lead to premium discounts.
Bettencourt said the program would not use state taxpayer funds and would instead rely on philanthropic donations, possible federal or regional housing-bank funding, and other outside sources. He said the department would not need new staff, and that a current position could be reconfigured to help administer the program part-time. Committee members asked about the funding language, the meaning of “loans” in the bill, whether there were any other states using a similar no-state-funds model, and how many homeowners could be helped. Bettencourt said Rhode Island and Connecticut were moving forward in a similar way, and that the number of beneficiaries would depend on how much money is raised.
Members also questioned how the grant program would actually lower premiums, whether savings would apply only to participants or more broadly, and how the IBHS evaluation process would work. Bettencourt and department staff said the direct benefit would be to the homeowner whose property is improved, though neighbors could also benefit in some cases. They explained that IBHS is a building-safety organization that certifies contractors and inspectors and that its standards can qualify homes for insurer discounts. Questions were also raised about confidentiality provisions, first-come-first-served grant awards, rollover of unused applications, and possible tax treatment of donations. The sponsor said those details would be addressed through rulemaking or existing tax rules, and no vote was taken during the hearing.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (02/24/2026)
Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- The department said that it's rather for access to deaf, hearing loss, vision, speech, and other impairments
- This isn't about hate. This is about love.
- This<05:16:39.680>
isn't <05:16:39.920>about <05:16:40.160>hate. - This isn't about hate. This isn't about hate.
Summary:
The House Committee on Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs heard HB 1790-FN, which would address involuntary admissions for certain individuals with a substance use disorder. Representative Lucy Weber introduced the bill for Representative Long, and the committee heard extensive testimony both in support of and in opposition to the proposal. Opponents, including John Burns of SOS Recovery and Jake Barry of New Futures, argued that involuntary commitment is not well supported by research, can retraumatize people, may increase overdose risk after release, and could undermine New Hampshire’s existing recovery and harm-reduction efforts. They emphasized that treatment should be voluntary, trauma-informed, and paired with housing, recovery supports, and other community-based services.
Representative Long said he was willing to accept DHHS’s request to amend the bill into a study commission, though he expressed concern that a prior state study had not led to action. He said the commission should focus on implementation details, including where people would be placed, staffing, withdrawal management, elopement prevention, length of commitment, and aftercare. He described involuntary commitment as one tool for people with severe dangerous addictions, distinct from drug court, and said it could help avoid criminal records. Committee members asked about capacity at New Hampshire Hospital and how the proposal would work in practice.
DHHS officials Katya Fox and Cynthia Pabonis testified that the bill raises major policy and fiscal concerns. They said New Hampshire’s current system has benefited from investments in naloxone, medication-assisted treatment, recovery centers, and community-based services, and that those investments have helped reduce overdose deaths. They estimated the bill would require a new 70-bed facility costing about $40 million to build and about $33.3 million annually to operate, with only a small portion offset by insurance, plus more than $600,000 in annual legal costs and additional staffing and system changes. They also said New Hampshire Hospital has 185 beds, with about 100 patients typically ready for less restrictive settings, and that housing shortages are a major bottleneck. NAMI New Hampshire also testified in opposition, saying families often want any possible treatment for loved ones but still opposed the bill. No vote or final action was taken in the hearing.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, March 31, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- WILL ENTERTAIN REQUESTS The Speaker pro tempore: The Chair will entertain requests for one-minute speeches
- The Chair will entertain requests for one-minute speeches. Mr.
- REQUESTS FOR ONE-MINUTE SPEECHES. MR.
- With hope, not hate. Because when you suppress the vote, you suppress the American dream.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (02/12/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- He said he is thinking about this as similar to the fundamental right of freedom of speech, freedom of
- Similar to how we protect the rights to free speech and assembly, we must also protect the right to compute
assembly <00:28:45.559>we <00:28:45.760>must <00:28:46.080>also free speech- and assembly we must also free speech and assembly we must also protect<00:28:46.679>
the <00: - I hate having to look stuff up, so I just threw it in.
Summary:
The committee first heard CACR 6, a proposed constitutional amendment by Representative Keith Ammon to recognize a fundamental right to use computation resources. Ammon argued that computing is now essential to daily life, speech, education, and economic opportunity, and said the amendment was intended to push back against government or corporate restrictions, citing a 2023 federal executive order on AI registration and reporting as an example of the kind of precedent he wanted to oppose. He said the proposal should be simple and clear because it would go to voters, and he compared the right to compute to other constitutional rights that do not require the government to provide the underlying tools.
Committee members raised concerns about the breadth of the language, including whether it could affect encryption, authentication, network security, energy use, and other regulatory issues. Representative McFarland questioned whether the amendment could interfere with security measures, while others asked whether it would prevent ordinary network management such as throttling or require the state to provide internet access or hardware. Ammon responded that the right would not entitle someone to other people’s resources and said encryption and similar issues would sort themselves out. Several members also raised concerns about child safety, public safety, and whether existing laws could still regulate misuse of computing; Ammon said reasonable limits would still apply, similar to other constitutional rights. Sarah Scott of Americans for Prosperity testified in support, saying the amendment would protect innovation, individual autonomy, and economic competitiveness by preventing overregulation. After questions concluded, the chair closed the hearing on CACR 6.
The committee then opened House Bill 615, sponsored by Representative Dan Maguire, which would substantially rewrite the state’s drug-forfeiture law. Maguire said the bill is intended to improve fairness and efficiency in cases where property such as cars or cash is seized in connection with drug offenses, noting that the criminal case and the civil forfeiture case are currently handled separately, with the property case prosecuted by the Attorney General’s office. He explained that the bill addresses courtroom procedure for these forfeiture actions and is meant to make the process more specific and orderly.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- Civil rights activists hated that decision.
- I hated so much about myself, and many of the people around me had no problem expressing their hatred
- I hated so much about myself and many of the people around me had no problems expressing their hatred
- this constitutional amendment, I think it's going to allow us to pivot over to what are really, I hate
- repercussions on current and future UC students, including the crackdown on student and faculty free speech
Summary:
The committee first heard AB 402, which would increase Cal Grant award amounts for students attending private nonprofit colleges and allow community college transfer entitlement awards to be used at those institutions. The author and supporters said the bill would restore award levels to their 2001 value and improve access for low- and middle-income, working, military, and transfer students. Several witnesses from private nonprofit universities, community college districts, and advocacy groups supported the measure. Senators raised concerns about the prior Cal Grant agreement tied to Associate Degree for Transfer participation and about the need to fund broader Cal Grant reforms, but the bill advanced on a unanimous due-pass vote to Senate Appropriations and was placed on call.
The committee then took up AB 2067, a sunset extension for lease-lease-back authority for TK-12 school construction through July 1, 2032. The author and supporters from school housing and contractor groups said the method provides flexibility, early collaboration, cost control, and legal certainty for school construction projects. Senators asked how often lease-lease-back and other alternative delivery methods are used, and whether the skilled-and-trained workforce provisions limit competition. Some members objected to the skilled-and-trained requirement, while others said the bill simply preserves an existing tool without changing labor rules. The bill passed on a 6-1 vote, with Senator Ochoa Bogh voting no, and was placed on call.
AB 1204, which would revise the Local Control Funding Formula by increasing supplemental and concentration grants, lowering the concentration threshold, adding regional cost adjustments, and setting a minimum annual COLA floor, drew extensive testimony on both sides. Supporters said the bill better reflects regional costs, inflation, and student need, especially for low-income, multilingual, and unhoused students. Opponents, including several school district leaders, argued it would widen funding disparities and divert money from the LCFF base grant, which they said should be the priority. Committee members also questioned the fiscal impact, the proposed 4% COLA floor, and whether the bill had enough research and stakeholder consensus. Despite those concerns, the bill was advanced to Appropriations on a due-pass vote and placed on call.
Finally, the committee heard AB 1235, which would require a skilled-and-trained workforce process for CSU design-build projects to align CSU with UC and community college construction rules. Supporters said it would improve training and project quality, while opponents from contractor groups argued it would reduce competition, increase costs, and impose mandates without evidence of better outcomes. Several senators objected to the skilled-and-trained requirement as limiting opportunities for contractors who comply with state law, while others noted the issue was already common in higher education construction. The discussion was still underway when the transcript ended, and no final vote on AB 1235 was captured.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session-Day 10, February 20, 2026-PM
Wyoming House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- I hate to blow the [snorts] bringer of the bill's head up too much, but this is a fantastic idea, and
- I<01:58:22.600>
hate <01:58:22.760>to <01:58:22.840>blow <01:58:23.080>the - ><01:58:23.600>
uh I hate to blow the uh I hate to blow the uh the<01:58:24.866>[snorts] - It could be a speech impediment. It can be hearing. It could be reflexes.
- Thank you. walking problems, hearing, speech, and walking problems, hearing, speech, and we<04:01:02.840
- ><01:58:23.600>
NV
Nevada 2025 Regular Session
Assembly Committee on Ways and Means Jun 1st, 2025 at 10:00 am
Ways and Means
Bills:
SB6, SB62, SB74, SB90, SB104, SB119, SB132, SB133, SB135, SB182, SB185, SB193, SB207, SB217, SB229, SB233, SB260, SB262, SB280, SB281, SB300, SB306, SB378, SB382, SB393, SB403, SB422, SB427, SB431, SB434, SB442, SB452, SB456, SB468, SB472, SB487, SB503, SB6
Keywords:
cloud seeding, Nevada, water conservation, agriculture, Desert Research Institute, victim compensation, hate crimes, property remediation, criminal justice, vulnerable persons, elections, voter registration, mail ballots, candidate eligibility, cybersecurity, education funding, teacher grants, classroom supplies, instructional support, specialized personnel
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, December 3, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Funds being sent to foreign countries that hate America have been cut off.
- Over my 15 years of service in this wonderful chamber, I've given many speeches.
- I've eulogized and talked speeches.
- Instead of free speech and open debate, we see censorship.
- The Chair will now entertain requests for one-minute speeches.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (01/23/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- [No audible speech; transcript contains only a filler/inaudible marker.]
- [No audible speech; transcript contains only a filler/inaudible marker.]
- [No audible speech; transcript contains only a filler/inaudible marker.]
- [No audible speech; transcript contains only a filler/inaudible marker.]
- [No audible speech; transcript contains only a filler/inaudible marker.]
Summary:
The committee first heard testimony on House Bill 167, which would add ski, snowboard, and boat wax containing PFAS to the state’s consumer-product restrictions. The sponsor argued the product is already banned in many places, has PFAS-free alternatives, and is used in ways that can directly contaminate water rather than landfills. She cited high PFAS levels in several New Hampshire lakes and said the bill was a simple extension of prior PFAS legislation. A witness also described a personal experience where a liquid ski wax disappeared from the market and later returned, likely because of PFAS concerns. The chair then closed the hearing on HB 167 without a vote.
The committee then opened a hearing on House Bill 312, dealing with college athletes’ name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights. Representative Moffett said the bill was modeled on New Jersey law and intended to let student-athletes earn compensation from NIL without losing institutional scholarships, while also requiring licensed representation and setting limits on certain endorsements. He described the measure as proactive because NIL rules are evolving and could create conflicts among schools and future lawsuits. Members questioned whether the bill should apply to two-year institutions, whether it should exclude firearms and weapons, and whether the scholarship protections would cover need-based or academic aid as well as athletic scholarships. Moffett said the scholarship language was intended to protect scholarships generally, but not need-based aid specifically, and he acknowledged discomfort with some of the endorsement restrictions.
Public testimony on HB 312 was mixed. One supporter, a former Division III athlete and coach, backed the bill but urged removal of a section allowing institutions or athletic bodies to use an athlete’s NIL without compensation, arguing most New Hampshire athletes do not receive NIL money and should not have to work extra jobs to cover basic expenses. The chair also raised concerns about the bill’s contractual and identity-rights implications, referencing prior committee work on a J.D. Salinger-related identity case and noting the committee had previously declined to get involved in similar contractual disputes. No vote was taken during the hearing.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (02/21/2025)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- [No audible speech; stray vocalization.] [No audible speech; stray vocalization.]
- [No audible speech; stray vocalization.] [No audible speech; stray vocalization.]
- [No audible speech; stray vocalization.] [No audible speech; stray vocalization.]
- [No audible speech; stray vocalization.] [No audible speech; stray vocalization.]
- [No audible speech; stray vocalization.] [No audible speech; stray vocalization.]
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, July 3, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- 53:03.040>
stateun <01:53:04.080>grocery <01:53:04.560>stores <01:53:05.199>hates - Party of state-run grocery stores hates this bill because this bill secures America's borders.
- severe brain injury as a child and requires extensive physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech
- occupational<03:34:38.319>
therapy, occupational therapy, occupational therapy, and<03:34:40.800>speech - and speech therapy. and speech therapy.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- It could be from speech delay all the way to autism. So, it's super huge.
- But it's everyone below that—ADHD, speech delay, developmental delay.
- <01:13:19.520>
I speech delay, um developmental delay. - I speech delay, um developmental delay.
- I mean, I hate to say go. yeah. I mean, I hate to say go.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.]
- [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.]
- [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.]
- [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.]
- [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.] [No audible speech captured.]
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.]
- [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.]
- [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.]
- [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.]
- [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.] [No audible speech.]
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, March 24, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.]
- [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.]
- [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.]
- [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.]
- [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.] [No discernible speech.]
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- disability, intellectual, developmental disability, emotional disturbance, learning disability, autism, speech
- We hate for them to be left out if they fit the low-income prioritization.
- We would also hate to incentivize a family pulling their children from schools in order to qualify for
- I hate to say that Matt is a constituent and a City Council member in Weatherford and did a great job
Bills:
SB 2
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Free speech rights are also good for patients.
- , and we'd his case and that was considered speech.
- for engaging in protected speech.
- Witness: Sir, it doesn't change the definition of speech.
- That type of speech, do we agree?
Keywords:
biological sex, gender identity, public facilities, civil penalties, local government, EBT, electronic benefits transfer, food stamps, SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, TANF, temporary assistance for needy families, welfare benefits, benefit card fraud, fraud hotline, card replacement, photo ID, recipient photograph, HHSC, Health and Human Services Commission