Transcript Highlights:

• :00.640><c> to</c><00:49:01.040><c> pass</c><00:49:01.880><c> on</c><00:49:02.079><c> House</c><00:49
• </c><00:49:42.839><c> so</c><00:49:43.400><c> again</c><00:49:43.599><c> I</c><00:49:43.720><c> think
• ><00:49:52.040><c> I</c><00:49:52.160><c> just</c><00:49:52.240><c> want</c><00:49:52.359><c> to</c>
• ><c> and</c><00:49:55.920><c> I'm</c><00:49:56.240><c> I</c><00:49:56.359><c> think</c><00:49:56.720>
• 49:24.719><c> is</c><01:49:25.239><c> when</c><01:49:25.400><c> we</c><01:49:25.520><c> look</c><01:49

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first addressed House Bill 415, which would remove the requirement that schools provide menstrual products. Members supporting an ITL said the mandate was unfunded, had been in place since 2019, and was already working without complaints from districts. Other members opposed the bill, arguing menstrual products are essential and that the requirement helps students, especially those with fewer resources. The committee voted ITL on HB 415 by a roll call of 17 yeas, 0 nays. The committee then took up House Bill 388, concerning public reports on special education. Supporters of ITL said they agreed with the goal of transparency but were concerned about student privacy, especially in small districts, and thought the bill’s information requests went too far. They noted that related issues could potentially be addressed in another bill, HB 557. The committee voted ITL on HB 388, 17-0. House Bill 730, which would require schools and some colleges to provide information on adoption, was also moved ITL. The sponsor said adoption is personally important to him but that the bill was not the right vehicle and involved entities such as colleges and the Attorney General unnecessarily; he said related ideas might be folded into other bills later. The committee agreed and voted ITL, 17-0. The committee then discussed House Bill 671, a preschool/early literacy proposal involving a statewide nonprofit digital program, likely Waterford. Members raised questions about who would be covered, data privacy, prior use of federal ESSER funds, whether the program had measurable results, and whether the bill’s nonprofit requirement was too restrictive. Department of Education witness Melissa White said the state had spent $400,000 in FY22 and $600,000 in FY23 on a Waterford contract using ARP ESSER funds, but she did not have participant counts and said the department could not measure literacy gains for that population. She also said the bill’s funding level would likely require an RFP and that, if enacted as written, the program would probably still be Waterford-based. The discussion continued without a final vote in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, that the way<00:49:05.200><c> that</c><00:49:05.359><c> this</c><00:49:06.040><c> bill</c><00:49:
• individuals,</c><00:49:10.120><c> after</c><00:49:10.440><c> we</c><00:49:10.560><c> pass</c><00:49:
• :11.640><c> can</c><00:49:11.800><c> apply</c><00:49:12.359><c> for</c><00:49:12.520><c> a</c><00:49:
• If<00:49:18.560><c> they</c><00:49:18.680><c> simply</c><00:49:19.040><c> apply</c><00:49:19.440><c>
• <c> would</c><00:49:20.880><c> see</c><00:49:21.040><c> that</c><00:49:21.600><c> in</c><00:49:21.800

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:03.760><c> The</c><00:49:03.920><c> next</c><00:49:04.160><c> bill</c><00:49:04.400><c> for
• </c><00:49:46.000><c> Chairman,</c><00:49:46.400><c> I</c><00:49:46.559><c> move</c><00:49:46.720><c>
• ><c> it</c><00:49:49.200><c> do</c><00:49:49.359><c> so</c><00:49:49.520><c> with</c><00:49:49.680><c
• that</c><00:49:50.640><c> House</c><00:49:50.880><c> Bill</c><00:49:51.200><c> 9</c><00:49:52.160><c
• ><c> ask</c><00:49:55.599><c> that</c><00:49:55.760><c> that</c><00:49:55.920><c> be</c><00:49:56.079

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:08.640><c> So</c><00:49:09.040><c> if</c><00:49:09.200><c> if</c><00:49:09.520><c> I</c><00
• :49:11.520><c> would</c><00:49:11.680><c> say</c><00:49:12.160><c> it</c><00:49:12.400><c> is</c> >>
• </c><00:49:36.240><c> So</c><00:49:36.400><c> you'd</c><00:49:36.559><c> have</c><00:49:36.640><c> a<
• Senator,<00:49:48.079><c> I</c><00:49:48.240><c> don't</c><00:49:48.319><c> think</c><00:49:48.480><c
• has already<00:49:52.079><c> testified</c><00:49:52.720><c> that</c><00:49:52.960><c> they</c><00:49:

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened with routine business, including the Pledge of Allegiance, seating alternates, and approval of the minutes and consent calendar. Both were approved without opposition. The committee then moved to the regular calendar, beginning with Department of Environmental Services drinking water rules (2532). Staff noted that the final proposal deleted requirements that had been in the initial proposal, making the published notice technically inaccurate because it said there were no substantive changes. The agency responded that the requirements still exist in other rules, that regulated entities and the Water Council were notified, and that the public had notice through related hearings. After discussion about whether a new noticed hearing was needed, the committee approved the rule. The next item was Department of Administrative Services personnel rule 2510 on seniority and employee performance evaluation. Staff raised informational comments and one unclear comment about language that appeared to require a checkbox even though no form exists, and about evaluation categories that could overlap. The agency said the checkbox language should be removed, but defended the overlapping categories as part of a long-standing template used by agencies for the past 10 years. Members discussed whether the language was too ambiguous or could lead to inconsistent application, but the committee ultimately approved the rule with a condition striking the checkbox language in the affected sections. The committee then considered personnel rule 25109 on investigations, discipline, non-disciplinary communications, and non-disciplinary removal. Staff recommended clarifying language distinguishing license suspension from termination for cause, and questioned whether the sexual-harassment discipline language was too broad because the same conduct could fit multiple discipline levels. The agency agreed to add the suggested clarification for the license-suspension provision, but argued the sexual-harassment language should remain because another rule already provides the factors for determining the appropriate discipline and the agency needs discretion for fact-specific cases. The discussion included concerns about how non-verbal conduct might be treated, but the committee moved toward conditional approval with the agreed clarification and approval of the rest of the rule as written.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:07.760><c> other</c><00:49:08.280><c> the</c><00:49:08.400><c> other</c><00:49:09.319><c>
• ><c> factors</c><00:49:13.559><c> in</c><00:49:14.079><c> more</c><00:49:15.079><c> I</c><00:49:15.240
• I I would have<00:49:15.599><c> to</c><00:49:15.760><c> go</c><00:49:15.960><c> back</c><00:49:16.200
• <00:49:25.280><c> those</c><00:49:25.480><c> tariffs</c><00:49:26.400><c> um</c><00:49:26.599><c> but
• ><c> now</c><01:49:12.400><c> and</c><01:49:12.560><c> that</c><01:49:12.679><c> is</c><01:49:12.840>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> by 49%. by 49%.
• </c><00:49:08.319><c> This</c><00:49:08.640><c> bill</c><00:49:08.960><c> brings</c><00:49:09.359><c>
• This<00:49:36.400><c> bill</c><00:49:36.720><c> modernizes</c><00:49:37.440><c> the</c><00:49:37.599>
• :38.640><c> so</c><00:49:38.880><c> we</c><00:49:39.119><c> can</c><00:49:39.359><c> build</c><00:49:
• 00:49:52.079><c> And</c><00:49:52.319><c> did</c><00:49:52.480><c> I</c><00:49:52.720><c> mention</c>

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Friday, December 12, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• in a interaction<00:49:19.119><c> between</c><00:49:19.359><c> a</c><00:49:19.599><c> car</c><00:49:
• the likelihood<00:49:22.559><c> of</c><00:49:22.720><c> fatal</c><00:49:23.119><c> injury</c><00:49:
• </c> &gt;&gt; Um<00:49:31.760><c> yeah,</c><00:49:32.079><c> thank</c><00:49:32.160><c> you</c><00:49
• ><c> data</c><00:49:33.760><c> in</c><00:49:33.920><c> front</c><00:49:34.000><c> of</c><00:49:34.079
• Um I<00:49:37.119><c> I</c><00:49:37.680><c> had</c><00:49:37.839><c> heard</c><00:49:38.000><c> it</

Bills: HF3919 , HF3791 , HF1781 , HF3908 , HF4233 , HF3966 , HF3430

Committee: House Transportation Finance and Policy

Keywords: veterans benefits, Secret War, Laos veterans, eligibility process, burial fees, veteran designation, security, protective services, state officials, Capitol complex, state patrol, public safety, legislative protection, threat assessment, transportation, electronic attestation, traffic signals, accident reporting, legislative routes, agricultural aircraft

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:24.960><c> It</c><00:49:25.040><c> just</c><00:49:25.240><c> says,</c><00:49:26.000><c> if
• ><c> you</c><00:49:29.040><c> want</c><00:49:29.360><c> to</c><00:49:29.480><c> hire</c><00:49:29.840
• you have<00:49:35.640><c> to</c><00:49:35.720><c> get</c><00:49:35.920><c> written</c><00:49:36.160>
• </c> That's<00:49:40.040><c> what</c><00:49:40.200><c> this</c><00:49:40.400><c> bill</c><00:49:40.600
• So,<00:49:44.000><c> a</c><00:49:44.080><c> yes</c><00:49:44.440><c> vote</c><00:49:44.800><c> says</

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:49:00.800><c> How</c><00:49:00.960><c> how</c><00:49:01.080><c> long</c><00:49:01.280><c> does</c
• I<00:49:05.000><c> think</c><00:49:05.240><c> that</c><00:49:05.440><c> would</c><00:49:05.560><c> be
• </c><00:49:11.400><c> is</c><00:49:11.680><c> is</c><00:49:11.800><c> about</c><00:49:12.040><c> 21</
• 49:13.840><c> the</c><00:49:14.080><c> is</c><00:49:14.240><c> the</c><00:49:14.400><c> minimum.
• Chair<00:49:18.320><c> recognizes</c><00:49:18.720><c> the</c><00:49:18.760><c> lady</c><00:49:18.960

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:49:22.719><c> that</c><01:49:23.440><c> an</c><01:49:23.840><c> even</c><01:49:24.239><c> the
• </c><01:49:26.560><c> I</c><01:49:26.800><c> mean</c><01:49:27.840><c> I</c><01:49:28.400><c> it</c>
• But<01:49:45.760><c> if</c><01:49:46.159><c> Andover</c><01:49:47.280><c> is</c><01:49:47.600><c> the
• > they're</c><01:49:54.239><c> not</c><01:49:54.320><c> the</c><01:49:54.400><c> one</c><01:49:54.560
• So if<01:49:56.800><c> it's</c><01:49:56.960><c> the</c><01:49:57.119><c> other</c><01:49:57.280><c>

Committee: House Education Funding

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Education Funding Committee met in executive session and reviewed several previously heard bills, but focused its discussion on SB 586 and SB 580. The chair explained that SB 586 would require school districts and school administrative units to publish audit reports after the fiscal year, and that an amendment, 1472H, had been prepared to replace the relevant audit/reporting section. The amendment would add SAUs to the reporting entities, expand the contents of audits to include items such as employee lists, pay, benefits, and pension liabilities, and change the timing so audits are submitted nine months after the fiscal year end, followed by a three-month Department of Education review and then a further correction period before any grant funding could be withheld. The amendment would also require the reports to be posted in searchable electronic form on the web. Committee members discussed whether the bill’s “non-compliance” language referred only to incomplete submissions or also to audit findings, and several members raised concerns about whether the Department of Education had the staff and authority to take on this role, whether the existing DOE25 process would be displaced, and whether the bill should instead remain with the Department of Revenue Administration. One member noted that the fiscal note anticipated the need for additional auditors and significant staffing costs. The committee also reviewed SB 580, described as a school cooperative purchasing program bill that also contains policy provisions for charter school trustees, school board members, and receivership-related language tied to Claremont. The chair said the committee had previously heard comments from Charlie Arlinghouse on the cooperative purchasing portion and would use a side-by-side comparison prepared by staff when it reached that bill. Other bills on the docket were briefly described but not taken up that day: SB 491, which has committee-requested amendments and a separate non-germane amendment related to curriculum frameworks and academic standards; SB 513, an owner’s project manager bill held as a possible vehicle for future non-germane language; and SB 531, concerning a cosmetology program in Coös County and a possible task force. The chair said the committee would not address 491, 513, or 531 that day and would return to 580 and 586.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:04.280><c> in</c><00:49:04.799><c> as</c><00:49:04.920><c> a</c><00:49:05.079><c> required
• so</c><00:49:06.680><c> if</c><00:49:06.799><c> you</c><00:49:06.920><c> already</c><00:49:07.160><c
• 00:49:08.599><c> the</c><00:49:09.079><c> basis</c><00:49:10.079><c> of</c><00:49:10.920><c> what</c>
• c> it</c><00:49:28.160><c> could</c><00:49:28.319><c> be</c><00:49:28.440><c> taking</c><00:49:28.760
• :49:31.160><c> so</c><00:49:32.040><c> when</c><00:49:32.240><c> we</c><00:49:32.440><c> came</c><00:

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 110, HD1, which would clarify local food purchase goals for the Department of Education. DOE said it supports the measure and will work toward the 30% local food mandate by 2030. The Department of Agriculture also supported the bill, and outside advocates from the Hawaii Public Health Institute and Hawaii Farm to School Network strongly backed it as consistent with prior farm-to-school laws and helpful for measuring progress toward the goal. The committee then took up House Bill 293, which would exempt certain DOE purchases of local edible produce and packaged food products from electronic procurement rules and allow written-quote purchasing thresholds, including a lower quote requirement for some rural schools. DOE, the Department of Agriculture, the State Procurement Office, and the Hawaii Farm Bureau all supported the measure, describing it as a tool to help the department test and add local products and meet the 30% goal. However, members pressed DOE on the bill’s purpose and mechanics, questioning why the department could not simply add products to vendor lists or use existing procurement flexibility. DOE explained it was trying to test new local products, including products not yet on the USDA-approved list, and said the bill would allow limited pilot purchases while it works through USDA approval and vendor-list updates. Members also raised concerns about whether the bill was being used to bypass procurement and whether small farmers or aggregators could realistically supply the needed volume. House Bill 1069, which would add two voting members representing DOE and the Board of Education to the School Facilities Authority, also drew support from DOE and the Board of Education. Supporters said the change would improve accountability, strategic input, and communication on school facilities matters. SFA testified that it has already increased coordination with DOE through regular meetings and that recent discussions have been more robust. Committee members questioned whether voting seats were necessary given that DOE and BOE could already attend meetings and receive updates, and they raised concerns about how a voting representative would report back and whether the measure would actually solve communication problems. No votes or final actions were taken on the measures during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:49:05.680><c> so</c><00:49:06.160><c> quickly</c><00:49:07.119><c> as</c><00:49:07.359><c> you've
• <00:49:09.200><c> and</c><00:49:09.599><c> that</c><00:49:10.079><c> combined</c><00:49:10.559><c> with
• um this<00:49:13.920><c> profit</c><00:49:14.400><c> motive</c><00:49:15.280><c> that</c><00:49:15.599
• especially<00:49:17.280><c> being</c><00:49:17.599><c> led</c><00:49:17.920><c> by</c><00:49:18.559>
• <00:49:52.720><c> and</c><00:49:52.880><c> and</c><00:49:53.280><c> of</c><00:49:53.520><c> AI</c><00

Committee: Senate Labor

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:49:06.720><c> that</c><00:49:07.040><c> that</c><00:49:07.839><c> the</c><00:49:08.240><c> area</
• where it's<00:49:09.520><c> um</c><00:49:10.240><c> you</c><00:49:10.480><c> know</c><00:49:10.559><
• </c><00:49:35.440><c> Um</c><00:49:35.920><c> when</c><00:49:36.240><c> we</c><00:49:36.480><c> go</c
• When<00:49:50.240><c> we</c><00:49:50.400><c> look</c><00:49:50.559><c> at</c><00:49:50.720><c> the</
• :57.760><c> the</c><00:49:58.079><c> first</c><00:49:58.319><c> one</c><00:49:59.440><c> uh</c><00:49

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It said<00:49:08.640><c> the</c><00:49:08.800><c> fallacies</c><00:49:09.280><c> the</c><00:49:09.520
• </c><00:49:12.160><c> It</c><00:49:12.400><c> said</c><00:49:12.559><c> the</c><00:49:12.720><c> trial
• <00:49:15.920><c> of</c><00:49:16.240><c> the</c><00:49:16.400><c> trial</c><00:49:16.720><c> judge's
• It said the court<00:49:20.160><c> failed</c><00:49:20.559><c> to</c><00:49:20.800><c> stay</c><00:49
• It<00:49:37.440><c> said</c><00:49:37.599><c> the</c><00:49:37.760><c> con</c><00:49:37.920><c> the</

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• time<00:49:21.760><c> there's</c><00:49:22.000><c> been</c><00:49:22.160><c> a</c><00:49:22.319><c>
• 00:49:26.760><c> talking</c><00:49:26.920><c> about</c><00:49:27.040><c> a</c><00:49:27.119><c> Pity<
• <c> it</c><00:49:28.119><c> may</c><00:49:28.280><c> or</c><00:49:28.440><c> may</c><00:49:28.599><c>
• :49:27.920><c> so</c><01:49:28.719><c> um</c><01:49:29.599><c> a</c><01:49:29.719><c> couple</c><01:49
• :49:42.399><c> a</c><02:49:42.479><c> lot</c><02:49:42.720><c> of</c><02:49:42.960><c> the</c><02:49:

Committee: House Health

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up SB 1494 on hearing aids. Testimony was generally supportive of expanding hearing-aid coverage, with the Insurance Division raising concern about possible federal defrayment issues, SHPDA supporting the goal of hearing augmentation, DCAB strongly supporting the bill as an important access issue, and health plans and insurers asking for amendments. Kaiser Permanente and the Hawaii Association of Health Plans requested changes to add a medical-necessity standard and clarify annual notice language, while HMSA suggested the proposal should be studied by the auditor. The chair noted concerns about federal preemption and the lack of an audit, and deferred the bill in favor of a related resolution calling for a study. The committee then heard SB 1448, an emergency appropriation for the Hawaii State Hospital. DAGS and the Department of Health supported the measure, with the hospital administrator saying the funding would improve the environment of care, support cleaning, and allow a third-party review of the building. Committee members questioned the size of the request and the status of litigation against the design-builder. Administration witnesses said they were pursuing a comprehensive study involving destructive testing, had made a demand on the design-builder to fund the study, and were using different processes than before. They also said the roof work would be handled through a separate CIP request. No final action was taken in the portion provided. The committee next heard SB 1432, relating to the future responsibilities of the Department of Health and land issues at Kalaupapa after the last patient dies. DOH supported the bill in part but said its long-term role would be limited mainly to environmental cleanup, with operations expected to continue under the National Park Service and land-use decisions left to DHHL and beneficiary consultation. DHHL asked that the measure reflect that any land-use or zoning changes on homeland lands require commission approval and beneficiary consultation. Testifiers from Kalaupapa and Maui County, including Degra Vanderbilt-Papa and Council Member Keani Rollins-Fernandez, supported deferring the bill, saying there had been no meaningful community discussion about provisions affecting Kalaupapa’s future management and possible transfer of responsibilities to Maui County. The committee also read into the record written testimony from Gloria Marks emphasizing that Kalaupapa stakeholders must be included in future discussions. Finally, the committee heard SB 955 on fitness-to-proceed examinations. The Judiciary and the Public Defender’s Office both supported raising pay and standardizing expectations for private examiners, but opposed reducing felony fitness evaluations from three examiners to one and opposed expanding use of expedited reports. They argued that a single examiner would reduce reliability, create a more adversarial process, and likely increase costs and contested hearings, while expedited reports do not contain enough information for a proper fitness determination. The Department of Health also supported the bill’s intent but asked to preserve a three-examiner framework and said the goal was to reduce the number of people sent to the State Hospital, where admissions have reportedly risen about 20% year over year since Act 26. The bill remained under discussion in the excerpt, with no final vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• Having<00:49:03.640><c> considered</c><00:49:04.120><c> the</c><00:49:04.200><c> same,</c><00:49:04.480
• c> recommends</c><00:49:05.360><c> that</c><00:49:05.520><c> the</c><00:49:05.600><c> bill</c><00:49:
• </c><00:49:08.560><c> Senator</c><00:49:09.040><c> Pearl</c><00:49:09.440><c> for</c><00:49:09.560><c
• The<00:49:48.960><c> motion</c><00:49:49.360><c> is</c><00:49:49.520><c> inexpedient</c><00:49:50.200
• &gt;&gt; Uh<00:49:54.440><c> thank</c><00:49:54.680><c> you,</c><00:49:54.760><c> Madam</c><00:49:55.000

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• &gt;&gt; I<00:49:17.839><c> know</c><00:49:18.000><c> several</c><00:49:18.319><c> of</c><00:49:18.480
• in the<00:49:23.040><c> in</c><00:49:23.359><c> the</c><00:49:23.520><c> school</c><00:49:23.680><c>
• </c><00:49:37.280><c> I</c><00:49:37.520><c> mean,</c><00:49:37.760><c> you</c><00:49:37.920><c> know
• <00:49:42.480><c> put</c><00:49:42.800><c> in</c><00:49:44.000><c> in</c><00:49:44.240><c> a</c><00:49
• 49:58.960><c> they</c><00:49:59.119><c> have</c><00:49:59.280><c> to</c><00:49:59.359><c> wait</c><00

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate<00:49:15.280><c> Bill</c><00:49:15.520><c> 31</c><00:49:16.079><c> by</c><00:49:16.480><c> Senators
• &gt;&gt; Thank<00:49:26.000><c> you,</c><00:49:26.240><c> Mr.</c><00:49:26.559><c> President.
• c><00:49:49.280><c> 29</c><00:49:49.839><c> eyes,</c><00:49:50.160><c> two</c><00:49:50.319><c> nos,<
• zero absent,<00:49:51.119><c> three</c><00:49:51.280><c> excuse,</c><00:49:51.599><c> one</c><00:49:51.760
• Senate bill<00:49:52.559><c> 31</c><00:49:53.040><c> is</c><00:49:53.359><c> passed.

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The Senate met with a quorum, approved the February 23, 2026 journal, and received several committee reports. Education recommended Senate Bill 67 be amended and sent to Appropriations, and Judiciary recommended Senate Bill 70 be amended and sent to Appropriations. The Education Committee also recommended confirmation of several Institute of Cannabis Research Governing Board appointments, and later the chamber confirmed a consent calendar of governor’s appointments, including members of the GOCO Trust Fund board, the Colorado Agriculture Development Authority, and the Wildlife Habitat Stamp Committee. On the floor, the Senate passed several bills. Senate Bill 85 and Senate Bill 25, both on the consent calendar, passed unanimously. Senate Bill 5, concerning state court remedies for violations of federal constitutional rights during immigration enforcement, passed on a 20-11 vote after a brief reconsideration mix-up and was then repassed. Senate Bill 18, concerning legal protections for a minor and sealing a related name-change record, passed 20-11. Senate Bill 31, concerning lawful use of a prescription drug product containing a Schedule I controlled substance, passed 29-2. The chamber then resolved into Committee of the Whole and took up Senate Bill 46, a property tax administration cleanup bill. After a Finance Committee report and adoption of amendment L003, the bill passed second reading and was ordered engrossed. The committee also laid over Senate Bills 53, 43, and 84 until February 25. Later, the Senate concurred with House amendments to Senate Bill 52, concerning coal transition communities and just transition money, and then repassed it. The Senate adopted the Committee of the Whole report and recessed until 11:00 a.m. after announcements and personal privilege remarks recognizing the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District and Musical Therapist Day.

Transcript Highlights:

• :49:08.240><c> this</c><00:49:08.559><c> great</c><00:49:08.880><c> promise</c><00:49:09.280><c> that
• </c><00:49:31.680><c> I've</c><00:49:31.839><c> been</c><00:49:31.920><c> the</c><00:49:32.240><c> act
• ><c> through</c><00:49:34.880><c> a</c><00:49:35.119><c> lot</c><00:49:35.200><c> of</c><00:49:35.680
• :49:38.000><c> back</c><00:49:38.160><c> in</c><00:49:38.319><c> the</c><00:49:38.480><c> day.
• So<00:49:39.680><c> we</c><00:49:39.920><c> upgraded</c><00:49:40.480><c> a</c><00:49:40.800><c> lot<

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :49:03.599><c> not</c><00:49:03.839><c> a</c><00:49:04.079><c> a</c><00:49:04.400><c> single</c><00:49
• whether<00:49:08.359><c> it's</c><00:49:08.640><c> a</c><00:49:08.799><c> hiring</c><00:49:09.280><c>
• <00:49:11.240><c> Services</c><00:49:12.240><c> uh</c><00:49:12.359><c> that</c><00:49:12.480><c> you
• all things<00:49:16.280><c> uh</c><00:49:16.400><c> and</c><00:49:16.520><c> then</c><00:49:16.799><
• /c><00:49:19.680><c> spouse</c><00:49:20.040><c> would</c><00:49:20.240><c> have</c><00:49:20.400><c>

Committee: House State-federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

Keywords: 1189, house, all