Transcript Highlights:

• This bill acknowledges that this subset requires prioritization.
• And I do acknowledge that the first violation under the bill would be an infraction, but the second..
• I do acknowledge that the first violation under the bill would be an infraction, but the second would
• You know, I first of all want to acknowledge this is an incredibly hard time for state and local law
• And so again, a lot of local law enforcement are Latino, and we got to acknowledge and recognize that

Summary: The committee heard several public safety measures, with extensive testimony on firearms regulation, disability and sexual assault, mental health diversion, emergency response, and law enforcement masking. SB 704 by Senator Arreguín would require firearm barrels to be purchased through licensed dealers with a background check, as a response to the rise in ghost guns and 3D-printed firearms; supporters said barrels are a key component of untraceable guns, while opponents argued the bill burdens lawful gun owners and does little to stop criminals. SB 258 by Senator Wahab would eliminate the remaining spousal rape exception for victims unable to consent because of disability; supporters called it a needed closure of an archaic loophole, while disability-rights advocates opposed it unless amended, warning it could worsen misunderstandings about capacity to consent and harm disabled people’s autonomy. After debate, SB 258 passed the committee on a due-pass motion to Appropriations, with several members voting aye and the bill held on call. Senator Umberg presented SB 398, which closes a loophole in the law prohibiting paying or offering money or other value to induce someone to vote or register to vote; there was little opposition, and the bill passed on a due-pass motion to Appropriations and was held on call. He also presented SB 27, a CARE Court cleanup measure that would allow certain misdemeanor defendants found incompetent to stand trial to be routed into CARE Court and would expand eligibility to some people with mood disorders with psychotic features. Supporters said it would improve access to treatment and reduce unnecessary incarceration, while county behavioral health directors and disability advocates warned it could blur the line between voluntary civil treatment and coercive criminal proceedings and expand CARE Court beyond its intended scope. SB 27 passed on a due-pass motion as amended to Appropriations. The committee also heard SB 36 from Senator Umberg, a price-gouging measure tied to wildfire-related emergency conditions that also expands search-warrant authority for certain misdemeanor investigations. Public defenders opposed the search-warrant expansion as unnecessary, while a late supporter from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office spoke in favor; the bill was moved on a due-pass motion as amended to Appropriations and held on call. SB 571 by Senator Arreguín would increase penalties for impersonating emergency personnel and related conduct during disasters; supporters cited post-fire looting and impersonation, while opponents argued longer sentences do not deter crime and that existing law is sufficient. The bill passed on a due-pass motion as amended to Appropriations and was held on call. Finally, Senator Wiener presented SB 627, which would prohibit law enforcement from wearing extreme masks except in limited circumstances, aimed largely at masked federal immigration enforcement operations. Supporters said masked, unidentified officers create fear and undermine trust, while law enforcement groups argued the bill wrongly sweeps in local officers, is too broad, and should instead target federal agents or impersonators. Testimony was still underway when the transcript ended, and no final committee action on SB 627 is shown here.

Transcript Highlights:

• I acknowledge that it's one that, you know, reasonably can be extended as well to a point where you're
• This bill simply acknowledges, for the first time in California's history, that if you are a descendant
• This bill simply acknowledges for the first time in California's history that if you are a descendant
• I wanted to raise two issues with you, but first I want to acknowledge the several conversations that
• And so first of all, I want to acknowledge your witness.

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to reproductive access, child safety online, immigration enforcement in schools, health privacy, location data, digital provenance, reparations, and age assurance. AB 54 would protect the medication abortion supply chain and shield providers and others from liability; AB 1137 would strengthen reporting and enforcement tools for child sexual abuse material on social media; AB 49 would limit ICE activity at California public schools; AB 82 would expand privacy and safety protections for gender-affirming care patients and providers; AB 1355 would restrict the collection, use, and sale of precise location data; AB 853 would expand provenance requirements for AI-generated and authentic content; AB 62 would create a pathway for restitution for racially biased eminent domain takings; and AB 1043 would create a device-based age assurance framework for online services. Supporters generally framed the bills as necessary responses to current harms: reproductive rights advocates emphasized California’s role as a safe haven; child safety witnesses described the persistence and re-victimization caused by CSAM online; immigrant rights and education advocates said schools should remain safe from immigration enforcement; health and LGBTQ+ advocates stressed privacy and safety risks tied to tracking and harassment; privacy and consumer groups backed limits on location data and stronger provenance tools; and reparations advocates said AB 62 would help address historic injustices. Opposition came from family policy, tech, business, law enforcement, and industry groups, who raised concerns about safety claims, constitutional issues, implementation burdens, transparency, law enforcement access, and the need to preserve existing privacy frameworks and voluntary standards. The committee members largely expressed support for the policy goals while noting implementation concerns on some measures. Several members asked for or were offered coauthor status on bills. AB 1137, AB 54, AB 49, AB 82, AB 1355, AB 853, and AB 62 all received do-pass votes to Appropriations, with some members voting no or not voting on certain bills. AB 1355 and AB 853 were advanced with amendments or ongoing work promised with opponents, and AB 1043 was presented with discussion of possible amendments on parental consent and age assurance details, though the transcript cuts off before final action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• I just want to acknowledge that as a possibility.
• of insurance that the HHF provides, here's the profile of associations that would be eligible, acknowledging
• that I and we at Aon can't acknowledging that I and we at Aon can't say<01:08:44.080> who's<01
• I acknowledge your comments.
• expecting answers and so I acknowledge expecting answers and so I acknowledge your<01:32:06.000>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I want to acknowledge the good-faith work that was done putting into the READ Act in the last two years
• , but I also want to acknowledge that the 2024 session essentially began a READ Act rollback, which we
• hope to rectify this session. read while the read act has acknowledged read while the read act has acknowledged
• <00:18:36.120> the underfunded I want to acknowledge the underfunded I want to acknowledge
• that the 24 also want to acknowledge that the 24 session<00:18:44.080> essentially<00:18:44.520

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It is about acknowledging a true history, a true past, and atrocities, but also the resiliency of California's
• AB 2115 intends to be an acknowledgment of those harms and reaffirms... ...the state's commitment to
• AB 2115 acknowledges the legislative actions and failures that inflicted profound pain and suffering
• We must acknowledge the gaps that exist in... ...to the future of California, we must acknowledge the
• I want to thank all of our colleagues for acknowledging that this is a need in their communities, and

Summary: The Assembly convened, established a quorum, and proceeded through a large House of Origin floor file, with the Speaker repeatedly urging members to be at their desks and keep support bills brief. Early actions included dispensing with the journal, re-referring AB 2285 to the Banking and Finance Committee, and then taking up dozens of third-reading items, with many bills passed by voice or recorded vote and others passed temporarily or retained on file. The floor debated and passed a wide range of measures on land use, housing, labor, public safety, health care, utilities, taxation, and consumer protection. Among the bills approved were measures on land surveyor review (AB 1933), nurse midwife access for pregnant and postpartum patients (AB 1696), historic-district transit zoning flexibility (AB 2415), EV charging infrastructure fees and timelines (AB 1820), foreclosure bidding protections (AB 1957), tribal cannabis commerce (AB 2506), outdoor advertising permitting (AB 2024), commercial building permit timelines and third-party plan checkers (AB 2418), DUI penalties (AB 1685 and AB 1687), utility rate transparency (AB 1715), CalWORKs work-penalty changes (AB 1755), dynamic electricity rates (AB 1787), interior designer licensure (AB 1796), compost labeling and contamination rules (AB 1812), modular housing standardization (AB 1815), small claims limits for businesses (AB 1827), Native American Day as a paid state holiday (AB 1841), hospital staffing and maternity access bills (AB 1868 and AB 1882), protective orders tied to release dates (AB 1889), and a series of public health, missing persons, and teacher credentialing measures later in the file. Several high-profile bills drew extended debate. AB 2624, expanding Safe at Home privacy protections to immigrant service providers, prompted sharp disagreement over free speech and alleged limits on online posting, but supporters said it protected workers facing threats and doxing; it ultimately passed 49-19. AB 2023, creating a framework for regulating AI chatbots used by children, was framed as a child-safety measure after testimony about chatbot-related harms and suicide risks, and passed 58-8. Other notable votes included AB 2208 on Medi-Cal protections against federal cuts, AB 2299 on CalFresh/SNAP losses, AB 2115 apologizing to California Native peoples for historic state harms, and AB 2311 on public hospital physician employment; the transcript ends as the Assembly continues working through the remaining file.

Transcript Highlights:

• Before I start, I want to take a moment to acknowledge the Department of Public Safety, Capitol Security
• Before I start, I want to take a moment to acknowledge the Department of Public Safety, Capitol Security
• Speaker. >> I want to first acknowledge I appreciate the work that was done here.
• An even bigger problem is that you're not willing to honestly acknowledge the work that you are doing
• We should at least be honest and acknowledge...

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The House took up Senate File 3432, a public safety bill requiring identifying equipment and insignia to be removed from emergency vehicles sold to the public. The chamber first adopted a House language amendment, then debated a broader security package that would fund judicial and courthouse security, Capitol security measures, short-term protection for legislators facing credible threats, State Patrol deficiency funding, and additional BCA analysts and investigators to assess threats statewide. Supporters framed the bill as necessary to protect public safety, democracy, and First Amendment activity at the Capitol and courthouses; they also said the package was pared down from larger requests and based on security reviews. The House adopted an A-1 amendment clarifying that BCA staff could investigate threats statewide, and later rejected a Schultz A-3 amendment that would have eliminated all appropriations in the bill. The A-3 was defeated on a 37-94 vote after the House upheld the Speaker’s ruling that a proposed school-safety secondary amendment was not germane, with that appeal decided 69-62. A major theme of debate was whether the Legislature should prioritize security for members and the Capitol before passing school safety funding. Several members argued they could not support spending tens of millions on Capitol and legislative security without first funding school safety for all students, including public, charter, private, and tribal schools. Others defended the bill as necessary because of recent threats and violence, including the June 14 tragedy, and said the Capitol security changes were based on professional recommendations. Some members also criticized the new security setup as overly restrictive or “security theater,” while supporters said the measures were needed to keep the public, staff, and lawmakers safe. After the A-3 was defeated, the bill was read for third time and members continued floor debate. The discussion remained split between those emphasizing immediate Capitol and legislative security needs and those insisting school safety should come first. Representative Agbaje then moved to table the bill, and the clerk began a roll call on that motion.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I want to acknowledge that as from what I know.
• Um I acknowledge that you have said. Um I acknowledge that. that. that.
• So, one is you acknowledge having voted for the expenditure of the, I don't track, was it $2 million
• But during the period when you're a fiduciary on that organization, did you acknowledge having voted
• So, do you acknowledge that would be the case? If that happened. >> Right. >> Right. >> Right.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee first took up decision-making on two judicial nominations heard the previous day. Governor’s Message 796, naming Annalisa En Bernard Lee as Circuit Court Judge for the Second Circuit (Maui County), and Governor’s Message 797, naming Michael K. Soong as Circuit Court Judge for the Fifth Circuit (Kauai), were both recommended for consent and adopted by unanimous roll-call votes. The committee then heard testimony on Governor’s Message 801, the nomination of Vladimir P. Devens as Chief Justice of the Hawaii State Supreme Court. Support came from the Governor’s office, Honolulu Prosecutor Steve Alm, Honolulu Managing Director Michael Formby, the Hawaii Association for Justice, United Public Workers, HGEA/AFL-CIO, the Hawaii Filipino Lawyers Association, labor and trade unions, retired Chief Justice Mark Recktenwald, retired judges, bar and court officials, and many other individuals and organizations. Supporters emphasized Devens’ legal experience, work ethic, labor-law background, community ties, mentorship, and ability to manage the judiciary and address the appellate backlog. A few speakers opposed the nomination, including Chuck Freedman, who raised concerns about union influence and potential conflicts, and others who submitted opposition testimony. Devens also testified, describing his Honolulu upbringing, education at UC Berkeley, six years with the police department, and more than 30 years in private practice before joining the Supreme Court. He said the chief justice role is primarily an administrative one, highlighted his experience with bar and judicial administration committees, and identified reducing the appellate backlog as a major priority. No vote was taken on GM 801 during this portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, I also want to acknowledge something that sits at the heart of this issue.
• Our coalition is here today with a clear request: acknowledge the economic harm done to our cities and
• > done<00:14:03.080> to Acknowledge the economic harm done to Acknowledge the economic
• Fully understand and acknowledge the conversations that the legislature is having right now regarding
• Fully understand and acknowledge the conversations that the legislature is having right now regarding

Bills: HF4477

Keywords: Minnesota business recovery loan program, small business loan, zero-interest loan, forgivable loan, business recovery, economic development, small business emergency loan account, Minnesota Initiative Foundations, nonprofit lenders, greater Minnesota, Twin Cities metro, seven-county metropolitan area, immigration enforcement, business interruption, revenue loss, job preservation, business stabilization, state appropriation, forward fund, loan forgiveness

Transcript Highlights:

• And with that, Chair and committee members, I want to acknowledge and thank the many partners who contributed
• And with that, Chair and committee members, I want to acknowledge and thank the many partners who contributed
• And with that, Chair and committee members, I want to acknowledge and thank the many partners who contributed
• And with that, Chair and committee members, I want to acknowledge and thank the many partners who contributed
• And with that, Chair and committee members, I want to acknowledge and thank the many partners who contributed

Bills: HF3700, HF3982, HF3927, HF3933, HF3949, HF4238, HF4275, HF4476, HF4504

Keywords: Duluth, Lake Superior Zoo, capital improvements, funding, bonds, appropriations, capital investment, port development, grant caps, state assistance, navigation facilities, Dakota County, state bonds, park improvements, infrastructure, transportation, safety, congestion, water infrastructure, bond issuance

Transcript Highlights:

• the hall have signed a proclamation acknowledging the great service of this individual.
• And we do so first by acknowledging<00:09:07.360> that<00:09:07.600> the acknowledging
• that the acknowledging that the speaker<00:09:08.920> of<00:09:09.120> our<00:09:09.320
• Will you acknowledge Brent Godfrey? career that is worth celebrating.
• Will you acknowledge<00:10:30.840> Brent<00:10:31.120> Godfrey? Welcome, Mr. Godfrey.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You're acknowledging a risk.
• You're acknowledging a risk.
• You're acknowledging a risk.
• You're acknowledging a risk.
• You're acknowledging a risk.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It continues the work that we were able to do together in 2023 and acknowledges how central that is to
• It continues the work that we were able to do together in 2023 and acknowledges how central that is to
• So, I just want to acknowledge that.
• Um, first I'd like to acknowledge<01:15:33.280> the<01:15:33.520> hard<01:15:33.760>
• But I I just want to acknowledge that.

Bills: HF2433, HF2434

Keywords: education funding, children with disabilities, transition aid, special education, school district consolidation, healthcare, personal care assistance, worker retention, disability services, state funding, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We understand that there are problems that exist in the system and we acknowledge them.
• I just want to acknowledge the testimony offered by the proponents of the bill.
• to get some amendments we are always willing to continue to work with opposition I just want to acknowledge
• We'd also like to acknowledge the personal story.
• California, said they do not have an opposed position, but wanted to acknowledge that they did submit

Summary: The Assembly Health Committee met on April 22 and took up a special order of bills focused largely on prior authorization and utilization management in health care. The chair framed the discussion as part of a broader legislative effort to reduce delays and barriers to care, especially in behavioral health, chronic disease management, cancer treatment, and rehabilitation services. AB 384 by Assembly Member Connolly would prohibit prior authorization for inpatient mental health or substance use emergency admissions and related physician care; supporters said it would prevent dangerous delays in crisis care, while insurers and health plans warned about fraud, abuse, and ambiguity around residential treatment facilities. The bill was moved on a due pass as amended motion and passed the committee on a party-line style vote, with Republicans largely absent or not voting. The committee then heard AB 510 by Assembly Member Addis, which would require health plans, upon request, to provide a peer reviewer of the same or similar specialty when a treating provider appeals a prior authorization denial or modification. Supporters argued that specialty-matched review would make appeals fairer and more clinically informed; opponents said the requirement was too rigid and that timelines and electronic submission rules needed changes. After discussion about the need for timely, specialty-specific review, the bill was approved on a due pass as amended motion and placed on call. AB 539 by Assembly Member Schiavo would extend prior authorization approvals to one year or the duration of the physician’s prescribed treatment for chronic conditions; supporters cited repeated denials and treatment interruptions, while opponents raised concerns about overbreadth, fraud, and the need for shorter validity periods. The bill was also passed as amended and placed on call. The committee next considered AB 669 by Assembly Member Haney, which would bar concurrent and retrospective review for the first 28 days of medically necessary substance use disorder treatment and limit prior authorization for related outpatient medications. The bill was presented with a powerful personal story from Ryan Matlock’s mother about her son’s death after an insurer cut off treatment early; supporters said the measure would keep patients in care long enough to stabilize, while opponents argued it would reduce oversight and could allow lower-quality or non-evidence-based care. The bill was moved on a due pass as amended motion and placed on call. Finally, AB 512 by Assembly Member Harabedian would shorten prior authorization response times to 24 hours for urgent requests and 48 hours for non-urgent requests; supporters said delays can worsen outcomes, while opponents warned the timelines were unrealistic and could increase administrative burdens and safety issues. The bill was approved as amended and placed on call. AB 574 by Assembly Member Mark Gonzalez was then heard; it would allow up to 12 medically necessary physical therapy sessions for a new episode of care without prior authorization, with supporters emphasizing stroke and neurological recovery and opponents warning of reduced oversight and unnecessary care. The transcript ends during testimony on AB 574, before final action is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• I do want to acknowledge the mission of MNHS and rectify that they have underreported marginalized peoples
• I do want to acknowledge the mission of MNHS and rectify that they have underreported marginalized peoples
• I do want to acknowledge the mission of MNHS and rectify that they have underreported marginalized peoples
• I do want to acknowledge the mission of MNHS and rectify that they have underreported marginalized peoples
• I do want to acknowledge the mission of MNHS and rectify that they have underreported marginalized peoples

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Before we begin, just wanted to acknowledge the Heavy Hitters from the University that are in the room
• Representative Woodson was thanked, and Representative Capella was acknowledged.
• Representative Woodson and Representative Capella were acknowledged.
• Okay, with that, before we recess, I just wanted to acknowledge in the front row the presence of Joshina
• in the front row the acknowledge in the front row the presence<01:55:40.040> of<01:55:40.239>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Higher Education met at the University of Hawaiʻi’s Bachman Hall and heard testimony on several UH-related bills. HB 542 would expand the Hawaiʻi Promise Program to provide unmet-need scholarships at four-year UH campuses. UH system officials, the UH Student Caucus, and a Honolulu Community College student testified in support, emphasizing college affordability, student retention, and workforce needs. Committee members asked about current program data, eligibility, transfer patterns, and cost; UH said it had data available, noted about 10% of current Hawaiʻi Promise students transfer to four-year campuses, and estimated the full expansion would cost about $12 million. UH also suggested a possible alternative of focusing on transfer opportunities from two-year to four-year campuses. The committee then heard HB 840, which concerns athletics appropriations for UH. UH Mānoa and UH Hilo supported the bill. UH officials said the funding would help cover recurring athletics operating costs, women’s sports travel and recruiting, Austin Awards, and a new nutrition fueling station, while Hilo said the money would help with travel, per diem, and conference-related costs. Members asked about the history of the athletics funding, the difference between Austin Awards and special talent waivers, NIL planning, and whether the appropriation should be restored to the base budget. UH explained that a $4 million athletics appropriation was originally made in 2018 or 2019, later removed from the base, and has been reappropriated annually since then. Finally, the committee heard HB 842, which would fund three additional permanent mental health practitioner positions at UH Mānoa’s Counseling and Student Development Center. UH supported the bill, and Academic Labor United and a high school student testified in favor, citing student stress, overwork, and the need for more counseling access. In questions, members discussed the current counselor-to-student ratio, recruitment challenges in a tight labor market, and strategies for hiring, including looking at candidates on soft-money grants who may be seeking stable employment. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• ,<01:08:07.800> navigators<01:08:08.720> are<01:08:08.880> frequently acknowledged
• , navigators are frequently acknowledged, navigators are frequently left<01:08:10.320> out<01:
• I'd like to acknowledge that many of you have taken time to sit with county staff to see these systems
• I'd<01:11:45.560> like<01:11:45.800> to<01:11:45.920> acknowledge<01:11:46.440><
• And again, I want to thank this committee for acknowledging that fighting hunger in our communities is

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• First, I do want to<00:32:04.640> acknowledge<00:32:05.039> the<00:32:05.279> many
• We acknowledge plainly that Minnesota needs more housing. We need more supply.
• So we're acknowledging that.
• So we're acknowledging<00:58:49.920> that.
• So this legislation acknowledging that.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• family engagement while acknowledging family engagement while acknowledging that<00:42:19.839>
• They are diligent and realistic, acknowledging that while external factors like mental health are out
• We must acknowledge that transportation remains a barrier.
• We<00:46:46.240> must<00:46:46.480> acknowledge<00:46:46.960> that<00:46:47.280>
• transportation We must acknowledge that transportation We must acknowledge that transportation

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So we felt that this bill acknowledges through the language that if an assessment, if a risk pool by
• <01:22:11.920> that we felt that it did acknowledge that we felt that it did acknowledge that
• So we felt that this bill acknowledges<01:22:33.920> through<01:22:34.239> the<01:22:34.400
• > language<01:22:35.040> if<01:22:35.840> uh acknowledges through the language if
• uh acknowledges through the language if uh an<01:22:36.239> assessment<01:22:37.199> uh

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think we need to acknowledge that this is not normal budget circumstances.
• I think we need to acknowledge that this is not normal budget circumstances, and the state of California
• The administration has acknowledged our questions and is working with us to clarify the methodology and
• And I think it is important to acknowledge that.
• On FURS, we do oppose the cut, but appreciate the acknowledgement of additional conversations for possibly

Summary: The hearing began with opening remarks on the Governor’s May Revision for child care and human services, with committee members and advocates stressing that the budget should not be balanced on the backs of low-income families, children, and providers. Legislative members and public witnesses strongly opposed the proposed suspension of the child care COLA, reductions to the Emergency Child Care Bridge Program, and the lack of codified rate reform tied to the alternative methodology. Several speakers also urged more support for providers affected by the Eaton fire and other disasters, and called for child care to be funded at the true cost of care and for additional slots to be restored. Administration, LAO, and Department of Education staff described the child care proposal as maintaining existing funding levels while adding administrative resources to prepare for federally required prospective payment changes and single-rate reform. The administration said the May Revision would suspend the 2025–26 COLA and reduce Bridge Program funding to align with utilization, while the LAO raised questions about the size and purpose of the proposed rate-reform and prospective-payment funding and recommended rejecting a Department of Technology exemption. CDE supported continued early education investments but said it would need additional resources if prospective pay were extended to state preschool, and it objected to a proposed reallocation of preschool funds for inclusive education grants. The committee then moved to the IHSS portion of the May Revision. DSS outlined five major proposals: capping provider work hours at 50 per week, eliminating IHSS for undocumented adults age 19 and older, shifting certain Community First Choice reassessment penalties to counties, reinstating the Medi-Cal asset test as a conforming IHSS reduction, and automating the termination of IHSS when Medi-Cal eligibility ends. DSS also discussed funding to implement a federal HCBS access rule and a separate reassessment of IHSS administrative methodology that found counties would need additional administrative funding. Finance said the proposals were intended to slow program growth and improve sustainability, while the LAO said it was still analyzing the package and raised concerns about implementation, county workload, and the potential loss of services. Committee members and public commenters criticized the IHSS cuts, especially the overtime cap and the elimination of services for undocumented adults and people affected by the asset test. Advocates argued that IHSS workers and recipients depend on these services, that county administration is already underfunded, and that the proposals could destabilize vulnerable consumers. The chair closed by saying the committee would continue to fight for child care and would not pause on child care, and the meeting recessed before moving on to the remaining May Revision items.