Video & Transcript Research : 'building code'

Page 62 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • Strong families build strong communities, and strong families require strong fathers.
  • What will be a basis in family code that will change a ton of things.
  • It changes one word, "shelter me," and it eliminates Section 8.064 of the Family Code.
  • We cannot build policy on the assumption that everything will go smoothly.
  • that maternity may be established in the same way as paternity under the Family Code.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • million request through TJJD (Texas Juvenile Justice Department) that's an article. to completely build
  • I want to be able to, in Lubbock County, not only just focus on building trades and electronics, but
  • So it would not just be the building trades. I would like to encompass everything that we have.
  • All right, members, we often talk in this building about the Texas miracle.
  • That language has been in the tax code for many, many years.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 30th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So we are fully committed to building the infrastructure of the future.
  • And, and, and while we can build a lot of transmission distribution, which I'm totally for.
  • You're testifying on behalf of Code Concepts.
  • ESS or a storage building filled with high-power combustible storage.
  • We have a lot of vast supporting buildings that are very close to very large buildings and data centers
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 30th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Green Building Council, and yourself, and you're for the bill, is that correct? That's correct.
  • Green Building Council. Thank you, Speaker, Dean, Chair, and members.
  • Government code, okay, just state. So, state, was it a state or local governmental entity?
  • , or at least in a building on the same property. the same campus.
  • Finally, it codifies the State Guard's right to maintain its own uniform standards, professional code
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 30th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not either using grid-enhancing technology to get more out of the current system versus building
  • The four proposed builds for Kendall and Kerr counties need to be set back. At least 500 yards.
  • You're testifying on behalf of Code Concepts Group, representing Advanced Power.
  • building filled with high-pile combustion materials.
  • We have a lot of BESS-supporting buildings that are very close to large buildings, data centers, and
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 5th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • understand that part I mean how so I understand that part I mean how many places are we have now where code
  • many places are we have now where code many places are we have now where code cases are solved by a
  • the licensed driver take possession of the licensed driver take possession of the vehicle who's who build
  • of this that's vehicle who's who build of this that's vehicle who's who build of this that's me okay
Bills: SB82, SB78, SB4, SB6, SB62, SB66, SB77, SB63, SB79, SB53, SB55, HB14
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • where we need to build out systems. where we need to build out systems.
  • <00:53:58.240> trade<00:53:58.680> building<00:53:59.040> and other building
  • trade building and other building trade building and construction<00:53:59.800> trades<00:54:
  • the risk of building the nuclear plants. the risk of building the nuclear plants.
  • , solid coalition building, solid coalition building, not<01:27:08.800> done<01:27:09.000>
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Unfortunately, the building code that was referenced previously, the building code doesn't reference
  • However, what will happen in a building code, for example, let's say that the International Building
  • However, what will happen in a building code, for example, let's say that the international building
  • I think our concern, though, is that the building code only talks about safety, not quality.
  • The cities have building codes, and this bill does not touch the building codes concerning safety.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • protect themselves, whether it's in the building or outside the building.
  • protect somebody outside that building. protect somebody outside that building.
  • state building operations efficiently. state building operations efficiently.
  • buildings under their custodial control. buildings under their custodial control.
  • Thank you, Representative Craft.” buildings. Uh we're saying we want to buildings.
Summary: The committee first attempted to approve minutes from February 24 and March 3, but members identified multiple spelling errors in names, so approval was held and the motion withdrawn. The committee then took up House File 3477, a bill by Representative Long proposing a civil remedy for constitutional violations by government actors, including federal actors. An author’s amendment (A4) was adopted to remove a subdivision and clarify retroactivity. In discussion, members raised concerns about Supremacy Clause and immigration-related issues; the author responded that the bill applies evenly to state and federal actors and is meant to enforce constitutional rights, not immigration law. After debate, the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register failed on a 6-7 vote, with one member excused. The committee next heard House File 3480, authored by Representative Howard, which would commission an independent economic impact study of Operation Metro Surge. An A2 amendment was adopted to add a dollar amount for the study and clarify timing. Representative Howard said the study would help the legislature understand statewide impacts and noted reported harm to businesses, child care, schools, and local governments. Testimony in support came from Laura Santiago, reading a statement from Christopher Gomez of Willmar, who described ICE agents entering his family’s restaurant, the detention and deportation of family members, and resulting business losses. Rachel Ser, Minneapolis emergency management director, cited a preliminary city assessment estimating major impacts including food insecurity, lost wages, business revenue losses, hotel cancellations, and rental assistance needs. Some members questioned the cost and usefulness of the study, while others said suburban and greater Minnesota communities also wanted the data. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the bill.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • so there's nowhere for them to build so there's nowhere for them to build out.<00:54:30.400>
  • , Everyone's like, "No, I refuse to build."
  • So like if they wanted to build a seawall, now there might be other triggers, but potentially the building
  • So like if they wanted to build a seawall, now there might be other triggers, but potentially the building
  • Um 2151 relating to building materials.
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 10, 2026, with Chair Mark Hashem outlining strict testimony rules and noting a time constraint because of later hearings and floor session obligations. The committee then took up several bills, hearing mostly supportive testimony on HB 1881 relating to land use, HB 2218 relating to DLNR/community management, and HB 1956 relating to freshwater waves, while HB 1845 relating to the Land Use Commission drew legal concerns and opposition. HB 2151 relating to building materials had no substantive testimony presented in the excerpt, and the committee moved through it quickly. On HB 1881, testimony focused on protecting North Shore lands from overdevelopment. A supporter described the area as valuable precisely because it remains largely undeveloped, and a member asked whether the bill’s restrictions on “finculars” would affect existing or future private residential installations; the response suggested the bill was aimed at future commercial uses and that grandfathering or personal-use exceptions might be possible, but the exact wording would need legal refinement. HB 2218 received broad support from OHA, DLNR, Kua, Sierra Club, Hui Maka Aana, the Honlay Initiative, and others, who said the measure would expand community-based co-management across DLNR divisions, build on existing park partnerships, and produce real benefits such as better stewardship, safer access, local jobs, and stronger community trust. Members asked about the bill’s five-year review structure, how multiple community groups would be handled, and whether the model could apply to ocean or nearshore areas; DLNR said the board would retain authority, agreements would be non-exclusive and subject to review, and the department was still working through how the approach would function across different divisions and marine settings. For HB 1956, the Attorney General offered technical comments, urging clearer definitions of “residing” and “freshwater way,” clearer timing for citations and arrests, and more explicit procedural safeguards and agency roles. On HB 1845, the Attorney General and Land Use Commission raised concerns that the bill could conflict with constitutional protections for important agricultural lands and could not be reconciled with existing voting requirements; the LUC also said commissioners cannot vote by proxy under sunshine law and warned that the bill could allow too few commissioners to approve major boundary changes. Members questioned how the bill would work in counties without designated important agricultural lands, and the LUC explained that Kauai is the only county to have completed the IAL process, while the broader statutory process remains county-driven and has been the subject of litigation. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/8/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • foot building square foot building uh<00:14:30.240> which<00:14:30.440> is<00:14:30.640
  • which now have occurred on the building which now have occurred on the building uh<00:15:18.040>
  • <00:15:24.880> on $34 million uh on this building on $34 million uh on this building on property
  • And so we already give private golf courses a break in our tax code.
  • golf courses a break in our tax code. golf courses a break in our tax code.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm sitting here thinking about like Madison County, which wants to build a new courthouse.
  • Well, when they build a new courthouse, this should be included. New courthouse.
  • But I'm sitting here thinking about like where the sheriff's building now...
  • Where the sheriff's building is now, I mean it's a current building, so it wouldn't be covered by this
  • But let's say they were building a new one, and pretty much it's just for issuing pistol permits.
Bills: SB1, SB83, SB159, SB160, SB1