Transcript Highlights:

• 32.240><c> typec><00:09:32.560><c> andc><00:09:32.880><c> quantityc><00:09:33.360><c> ofc><00
• c><00:18:26.720><c> Andc><00:18:27.120><c> whatc><00:18:27.440><c> typec> and find any information
• And what type of<00:18:27.840><c> activityc><00:18:28.320><c> didc><00:18:28.559><c> youc><00:18
• ><c> servicesc><00:18:32.799><c> umc> deliver those types of services um deliver those types of services
• ><c> servicesc><00:18:37.360><c> havec><00:18:37.600><c> youc> type of activities and services

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• uh uh<00:22:50.880><c> typec><00:22:51.200><c> thingc><00:22:51.520><c> soc><00:22:51.679><c>
• c><00:31:57.679><c> managingc><00:31:58.080><c> thatc><00:31:58.320><c> typec><00:31:58.480><
• ><c> allc><00:33:02.159><c> thosec><00:33:02.399><c> typec><00:33:02.559><c> ofc> and restricting
• <00:46:48.720><c> toc><00:46:48.960><c> 80%c><00:46:50.240><c> uhc><00:46:50.400><c> typec><00
• :46:50.640><c> ofc><00:46:50.800><c> windowc><00:46:51.280><c> toc> even a 20 to 80% uh type of

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee opened its first meeting on retained education funding bills, focusing on HB 366, which concerns school building aid for eligible projects, and HB 295, which would make school building aid program funds non-lapsing. The chair framed the discussion broadly around whether school building aid should remain a state program, how to address limited revenues, and whether the current system should continue to prioritize debt service and the existing formula or move toward a different model such as per-pupil allocations, a dedicated fund, or a split between new construction and renovation. He also raised questions about whether leasing should be included and how to manage any new fund under current law and the school building authority structure. Representatives and department staff discussed the current backlog of applications, the age and condition of school facilities, and the possibility that large projects can consume available funding for a year while other districts go unsupported. Tim Carney of the Bureau of School Facilities introduced himself and provided technical context on the program and current debt levels. Representative Luneau argued that under the ConVal decision, the state’s responsibility includes school buildings, construction, and renovation, and that the program also serves an equity function by helping districts with less property wealth. He noted that construction and renovation have long been recognized categories and asked about leasing, which staff said is already supported in statute for charter schools and possibly CTE, with a cap of 30% of annual lease cost or $50,000. The discussion also covered CTE facilities: staff explained that capital funding for CTE centers is state-funded, that federal Carl Perkins funds cannot be used for construction, and that the current rotational capital model means only a few centers are funded each year, which may not match changing program needs. A committee studying CTE capital needs was referenced, along with concerns that the report from that work had not yet been received. Representative Papich urged the subcommittee to focus on policy, principles, and structure rather than just numbers, saying the current system produces a few winners and many districts that never receive aid. He favored a simpler, more equitable per-capita or formula-based approach, while acknowledging the need for a transition plan for projects already in the pipeline. The chair later cautioned against mixing maintenance and operations with construction and renovation, noting that operation and maintenance are already part of the adequacy formula and should not be confused with capital funding. No votes were taken during the meeting; the discussion was exploratory, with members and staff laying out competing approaches and identifying issues for further work.

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:12:23.920><c> somec><00:12:24.160><c> typec><00:12:24.399><c> ofc><00:12:24.560><c> a
• c><00:12:24.880><c> ac> understand this is not some type of a a understand this is not some type of
• ><c> legislationsc><00:59:53.680><c> thatc><00:59:53.920><c> arec><00:59:54.079><c> inc> types
• c><01:08:23.759><c> typec><01:08:23.920><c> ofc> right?
• /c><02:39:49.760><c> typec><02:39:49.920><c> ofc><02:39:50.080><c> anc><02:39:50.240><c> idea.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c><01:27:08.480><c> thec><01:27:08.639><c> typesc><01:27:08.840><c> ofc><01:27:09.000><c> learning
• c><01:27:09.480><c> thec> of Engagement the types of learning the of Engagement the types of learning
• c><04:48:15.760><c> thatc> never seen the type of reactions that never seen the type of reactions
• types of has ever had and those are the types of things<04:51:21.240><c> thatc><04:51:21.360><c> we
• /c><05:23:52.280><c> typec><05:23:52.480><c> ofc> businesses on the what type of businesses on the

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Finance received an informational briefing from the Department of Education on its budget request for the upcoming fiscal year. The Superintendent and staff described the department’s mission, enrollment and staffing scale, recent gains in NAEP reading and math, persistent attendance problems since the pandemic, and the need for resources to support student recovery, middle school math, and other strategic priorities. The department said its proposal is intended to be aligned with its 2023–2029 strategic plan, fiscally balanced, and reliable for schools, while also addressing inflation, workforce needs, and uncertainty in federal funding. Assistant Superintendent and CFO Brian Hallet reviewed federal grants, non-general funds, and the budget development process. He said federal funds make up about 11% of the department’s FY25 appropriation and warned that House budget proposals could threaten predictable funding for core programs. He also explained that the department began its biennial budget work in April 2024 and used an internal review group to identify possible reallocations. The department characterized its request as a “flat” budget proposal overall, with a large share devoted to continued funding for existing recurring needs, and noted challenges including a projected state funding decline, inflation, lingering pandemic impacts, recruitment and retention, and uncertainty about future federal support. A major topic was the department’s capital improvement program. DOE officials argued for a risk-based, proactive approach using lump-sum “buckets” to manage facilities and deferred maintenance across more than 21.5 million square feet at 268 sites. They said this would allow more efficient prioritization of projects and better coordination with complex area superintendents, principals, and legislators. Members asked about how legislative priorities would fit into the bucket system, county-versus-state property jurisdiction issues affecting school facilities, enrollment decline and staffing ratios, and how the department plans to adjust facilities and human resources to shifting enrollment patterns. DOE said it is studying enrollment trends, will brief the Board of Education next month, and is willing to provide further briefings to legislators. No votes or formal actions were taken during the informational briefing.

Transcript Highlights:

• c> typesc><00:15:52.960><c> ofc><00:15:53.040><c> programs.
• /c><00:26:41.320><c> bec><00:26:41.600><c> thec><00:26:41.760><c> typec> getting?
• 27:14.640><c> inc><00:27:15.240><c> viac><00:27:15.480><c> thatc><00:27:15.720><c> typec><00:
• ><c> thatc><01:25:29.160><c> theyc> trying to get the type of care that they trying to get the type
• some type of a and you know, some type of a advice<05:08:27.640><c> toc><05:08:27.760><c> helpc><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on Senate Bill 562, which would create a home damage mitigation and resilience grant program aimed at helping homeowners make property improvements that could reduce insurance costs and non-renewals. Commissioner DJ Bettencourt of the New Hampshire Insurance Department explained that the program is modeled in part on Alabama’s safer homes program, but tailored for New Hampshire hazards such as floods, microbursts, heavy snow, ice, and falling trees. He said the grants would be limited to primary residences, subject to a means test, capped at $10,000, and intended to help homeowners make targeted improvements such as roof fortification or tree removal that could improve underwriting outcomes and lead to premium discounts. Bettencourt said the program would not use state taxpayer funds and would instead rely on philanthropic donations, possible federal or regional housing-bank funding, and other outside sources. He said the department would not need new staff, and that a current position could be reconfigured to help administer the program part-time. Committee members asked about the funding language, the meaning of “loans” in the bill, whether there were any other states using a similar no-state-funds model, and how many homeowners could be helped. Bettencourt said Rhode Island and Connecticut were moving forward in a similar way, and that the number of beneficiaries would depend on how much money is raised. Members also questioned how the grant program would actually lower premiums, whether savings would apply only to participants or more broadly, and how the IBHS evaluation process would work. Bettencourt and department staff said the direct benefit would be to the homeowner whose property is improved, though neighbors could also benefit in some cases. They explained that IBHS is a building-safety organization that certifies contractors and inspectors and that its standards can qualify homes for insurer discounts. Questions were also raised about confidentiality provisions, first-come-first-served grant awards, rollover of unused applications, and possible tax treatment of donations. The sponsor said those details would be addressed through rulemaking or existing tax rules, and no vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• :53.760><c> thatc><00:08:54.160><c> countyc><00:08:54.399><c> isc><00:08:54.640><c> whatc><00
• So it's<00:08:57.519><c> thatc><00:08:57.760><c> typec><00:08:57.920><c> ofc><00:08:58.720><c>
• ofc><00:08:59.120><c> changesc> it's that type of of changes it's that type of of changes [snorts
• Andc><00:10:32.320><c> whatc><00:10:32.560><c> wec><00:10:32.720><c> seekc><00:10:32.959><c>
• c><00:10:42.640><c> uhc><00:10:42.800><c> wec><00:10:43.120><c> wantc><00:10:43.200><c> toc

Bills: SB200, SB206, SB200, SB206

Keywords: accountability courts, drug offenders, mental health, substance abuse, veterans, court reform, recidivism reduction, treatment programs, veterans benefits, advising, deceptive trade practices, accreditation, compensation, minority affairs, civic engagement, Alabama office, community outreach, government affairs, codification, laws

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:40:07.839><c> ofc><00:40:08.599><c> umc><00:40:09.599><c> thatc><00:40:09.800><c> type<
• /c><00:40:09.960><c> ofc> against those types of um that type of against those types of um that type
• see the results<00:41:48.680><c> ofc><00:41:48.880><c> thatc><00:41:49.079><c> typec><00:41:49.280
• ><c> ofc><00:41:49.480><c> ideologyc><00:41:50.359><c> inc> results of that type of ideology in
• givec><00:45:35.800><c> usc><00:45:36.000><c> somec><00:45:36.280><c> typec><00:45:36.480><c

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up SB 19, which would require a daily moment of silence or reflection in Kentucky public schools and clarify that students may use the time as they choose without coercion or religious direction. The sponsor and supporters, including representatives of the Kentucky Jewish Council, argued the bill is nonsectarian, intended to promote calm and focus, and supported by research and prior bipartisan backing. Opponents from the Jewish Federation of the Bluegrass said they supported the anti-coercion language but objected to making the moment of silence mandatory rather than permissive, citing concerns about the statute’s interaction with the Lord’s Prayer language already in law. After discussion, the committee voted to pass SB 19 unanimously with favorable expression. The committee then considered SB 83, which revises the KEES scholarship program so homeschool and non-certified school students can receive awards using an ACT-to-GPA conversion and be treated more comparably to public school students. The sponsor described the bill as a recurring measure and walked through how the award amounts would be calculated under the substitute. There was no opposition raised during the hearing, and the committee adopted the substitute and passed SB 83 unanimously with favorable expression. Finally, the committee heard Senate Joint Resolution 55, directing Kentucky public postsecondary institutions to combat anti-Semitism. The resolution would require campuses to adopt policies using the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, notify students of Title VI and state-law complaint rights, recognize Jewish organizations as community resources on the same basis as other religious organizations, take action against student groups supporting designated terrorist organizations, and collect and report campus anti-Semitism data. The presenters and supporters described a sharp rise in anti-Semitic incidents on campuses after October 7 and said schools have not responded adequately. The committee adopted the substitute and began hearing testimony on the resolution, but the transcript cuts off before any final vote on SJR 55.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> thatc><00:54:34.079><c> typec><00:54:34.240><c> ofc> bill require reporting on that type of
• bill require reporting on that type of data<00:54:34.760><c> thatc><00:54:34.880><c> wouldc><00:
• typec><01:17:46.880><c> ofc><01:17:47.000><c> lurec><01:17:47.520><c> soc><01:17:47.679><c>
• hopefullyc><01:17:48.040><c> wec><01:17:48.120><c> canc><01:17:48.960><c> uhc> this type of lure
• ><c> ofc><01:22:45.120><c> schoolsc><01:22:45.560><c> Ic> establish these types of schools I establish

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Education met on January 30 and heard testimony on several bills, beginning with an announcement asking testifiers and members to keep remarks brief because of weather. The vice chair also explained that HB 440, relating to immigration issues in schools and state hospitals, was removed from the agenda because the proposal would not create meaningful legal protections and immigration policy is governed by federal law. The committee then moved through a series of education-related measures, with testimony largely from the Department of Education, the School Facilities Authority, the Attorney General’s office, unions, advocacy groups, and individual testifiers. On HB 330, concerning school impact fees, the School Facilities Authority supported the bill as aligning policy with implementation, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii said the fee accounts have accumulated large balances, including more than $20 million in impact fee funds and nearly $9 million from predecessor fair-share contributions, and urged that collected money be used rather than left idle. DOE said it would follow up on the balance and why it was not being used. On HB 1188, dealing with workforce housing, DOE and the Charter School Commission offered comments or support, the Attorney General suggested clarifying the phrase “within commuting distance” by using a mileage standard and adding repayment language, and HSTA, HGEA, and others supported the bill, with HSTA saying teachers need housing to be able to live and work in Hawaii. On HB 624 and HB 625, both related to school psychologists, DOE said it would participate in a work group on the pathway bill and supported the incentive program bill; school psychologists and related groups supported the measures, while one testifier said DOE should not lead the work group alone because school psychologists may work in many education settings beyond DOE schools. The committee also heard HB 1314 on youth mental health in schools. DOE described its student support process, universal screening tools, and behavioral health services, saying schools already identify and respond to concerns and that staff are trained to report issues, while the Attorney General warned the bill could expose schools to liability and recommended a broad liability waiver. Testimony was mixed, with several supporters and one opponent. On HB 616, concerning school safety and harassment protections for educational workers, the Attorney General sought clarifying amendments on harassment definitions, temporary restraining order costs, and paid leave, while HSTA, HGEA, and individual teachers strongly supported the bill, describing harassment incidents and arguing for a standardized statewide response. DOE said it already has reporting pathways, visitor codes of conduct, trespass notices, and an ethics hotline, but acknowledged implementation varies by school and that staff can escalate concerns if needed. The committee also began hearing HB 88 on a three-year pilot program for athletic travel, but the transcript cuts off before that bill’s testimony is completed or any votes are taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• we do provide these types<00:08:16.080><c> ofc><00:08:16.319><c> minimalc><00:08:16.800><c> benefits
• c><00:08:17.599><c> toc><00:08:17.919><c> thosec><00:08:18.240><c> whoc> types of minimal benefits
• to those who types of minimal benefits to those who are<00:08:18.639><c> eitherc><00:08:18.960><c>
• under these types<00:23:56.480><c> ofc><00:23:56.640><c> benefitsc><00:23:57.200><c> whenc><00
• :23:57.440><c> it'sc><00:23:57.679><c> obviousc><00:23:58.320><c> hec> types of benefits when it's

Keywords: Reuploaded to restore a few minutes lost at the end of the meeting Representative Tackett-Lafferty: 00:22 • Line of Duty Disability Benefits Representative Grossberg: 26:32 • Loss of TRS Credit Due to Religious Holiday Observance Representative Blanton: 32:01 • Educational Contracts and Membership Dates in KERS Representative Tipton and Representative Blanton: 40:55 • Apply SB 10 Changes from 2025 to KERS/SPRS Senator Higdon: 46:08 • PPOB Reporting on Line of Duty Benefits • TRS Annual Leave Impact on TRS • PPOB Membership • Use of Sick Leave for Religious Holidays Adjournment: 56:03, 958, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony from Rep. Ashley Tackett Laferty on a bill to extend minimum line-of-duty hazardous duty retirement benefits to certain CERS and KERS non-hazardous members who are injured in the line of duty and cannot return to that work. She used a video and examples from Eastern Kentucky first responders, including a deputy who lost a leg and an emergency management director who lost an eye, to argue that some injured officers and responders fall through the cracks because their employers did not elect hazardous-duty coverage. She said the proposal would provide 25% of pay to the disabled officer, plus 10% for dependent children and minimal health benefits, and noted estimated actuarial costs of about $2.9 million for CERS and $0.542 million for KERS, funded through small employer-rate increases. Members asked how far back the bill would reach, how many people might qualify, and whether the benefit would apply only to active employees or also to past injuries. Laferty said the bill would include a five-year window for recent situations and could potentially cover a total of 3,333 positions statewide that could be certified as hazardous, though benefits would only apply if the person was injured in the line of duty and disabled from returning to that work. Questions also focused on whether a non-hazardous employee could qualify if injured in a hazardous situation; Laferty said yes, if the position could be certified as hazardous, but only for the bill’s minimum benefits. Rep. Josh Calloway and others noted that local governments choose whether to pay the higher hazardous-duty contribution rates, which they said often drives the coverage decision. The committee then heard Rep. Daniel Gberg present a separate bill revising school leave rules so teachers and school employees may use accumulated sick leave to observe religious holidays not on the school calendar, with a required personal statement and advance notice. He said the change would address a longstanding inconsistency for teachers who observe non-Christian holidays and currently may have to choose between unpaid leave or improperly using sick days, and he said prior concerns about retirement service credit and maternity leave were reduced by other policy changes. The discussion ended without a vote, with members indicating they had the relevant materials and that the bill would be revisited later.

Transcript Highlights:

• 04:47.680><c> forc><00:04:48.000><c> thec><00:04:48.280><c> samec><00:04:48.720><c> typec><00
• :04:49.160><c> ofc><00:04:50.080><c> uhc> tax exemption for the same type of uh tax exemption for
• the same type of uh medical<00:04:50.800><c> Goodsc><00:04:51.680><c> thatc><00:04:52.199><c> are
• 00:15:44.639><c> typec><00:15:45.160><c> ofc><00:15:45.680><c> umc><00:15:46.639><c> uhc> exempt
• c> couldc><00:27:36.399><c> bec><00:27:36.559><c> consideredc><00:27:37.039><c> suchc> Tax types

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Tax Committee first approved the minutes from the previous meeting and then took up Senate File 11 at the request of the Judiciary Committee. The bill was removed from the table, recommended to pass, and referred to Judiciary. Members explained that the request was tied to data practices language in the bill and Judiciary’s jurisdiction over that subject. The committee then heard Senate File 268, as amended by the A1 amendment. Senator Nelson said the bill would extend a sales tax exemption for certain physician-prescribed, non-durable medical goods to publicly and privately held health plans, aligning them with treatment already given to Medicare, Medicaid, and other government-paid plans. Testifiers from Corner Home Medical and the industry said current tax rules are confusing, audits are burdensome and expensive, and providers often end up paying tax themselves because insurers do not pay retroactively. They argued the bill would reduce administrative burden and create parity in the tax code. The committee adopted the A1 amendment and laid the bill over. Finally, the committee heard Senate File 88, also amended by an A1 technical change. Senator Klein said the bill is intended to prevent the Department of Revenue from issuing retroactive assessments when taxpayers relied in good faith on prior audit guidance, so long as there was no material change in law, court interpretation, federal adjustment, or written notice from the commissioner. Department of Revenue staff said they had no formal position but explained how the bill would affect sample audits and noted it would require more detailed written guidance; they said normal audits would not change much. Supporters from the CPA Society and several senators said the bill would provide certainty and protect taxpayers from unexpected back taxes, while one senator questioned whether the bill was needed and whether it would bypass settlement or litigation. The bill was laid over after discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:31:24.720><c> typec><00:31:24.960><c> 2c> pharmaceutical options for type 2 pharmaceutical
• options for type 2 diabetes<00:31:26.799><c> andc><00:31:26.919><c> itc><00:31:27.039><c> isc><
• ><c> whenc><00:32:07.080><c> peoplec><00:32:07.480><c> withc><00:32:07.679><c> typec><00:32:07.919
• <c> whatc><00:41:59.599><c> typesc><00:41:59.839><c> ofc> those who don't and maybe what types
• ><c> ofc> bet the company type pieces of bet the company type pieces of litigation<02:48:30.160><c>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee first reviewed its schedule, noting that 13 bills were being executed the next day and that additional subcommittee work would be scheduled around Town Meeting Day and the following session days. The chair explained that the committee would not meet on Town Meeting Day, would handle the remaining bills on the next available subcommittee day, and would continue any unfinished items later in the month. The committee then took up House Bill 774, which concerned Medicare-related coverage issues. Members discussed the bill’s purpose and the differences between Medicare standard and Medicare Advantage, with one member saying the proposal was informative but did not offer a workable solution. The committee also moved to inexpedient to legislate on House Bill 185, and the motion passed on a 6-0 vote. House Bill 241, relating to alternatives to opioids, was retained for further work. Members said the bill raised concerns about insurers effectively practicing medicine and about the lack of evidence on the efficacy of some alternative treatments, while also noting that chiropractic coverage mandates already exist in statute. The committee voted to retain the bill, with the motion passing 6-0. The most extended discussion was on House Bill 648, which would expand insurance coverage for glucose monitoring. Testimony and committee comments focused on whether coverage should be tied to insulin use or instead to a physician’s medical judgment, the role of continuous glucose monitoring for people with type 2 diabetes who are not on insulin, and the potential cost impact. An insurance department fiscal analyst said the original $22-per-member estimate was based on the unamended bill and that the amended version would require updated analysis; members agreed to retain the bill to narrow the eligible population and revisit the language later.

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:01:27.040><c> Nowc><00:01:27.200><c> it'sc><00:01:27.680><c> upc><00:01:27.920><c> to
• c><00:01:32.320><c> Nowc><00:01:32.479><c> it'sc><00:01:32.799><c> upc><00:01:32.960><c> to
• 35.920><c> longc><00:01:36.000><c> asc><00:01:36.159><c> thec><00:01:36.320><c> valuec><00:01
• How how's that handled and and that<00:39:56.880><c> typec><00:39:57.040><c> ofc><00:39:57.200><c
• <c> myc> that type of thing, I guess, is my that type of thing, I guess, is my question. question.

Bills: SF0007, SF0008, SF0009, SF0010

Keywords: theft, penalties, larceny, criminal offense, felony, Wyoming, absconding, law enforcement, criminal justice, fentanyl, controlled substances, minors, drug distribution, enhanced penalties, mental health, detention, competency evaluation, treatment, contractual agreements, 916

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> typec><00:13:25.720><c> ofc><00:13:25.920><c> workc> inconsistent treatment of a type of work
• > ofc><00:17:33.760><c> compensationc> treat the same type of compensation treat the same type of
• ><c> whetherc><01:09:22.600><c> it'sc> space of various types whether it's space of various types
• typesc><01:23:22.960><c> ofc><01:23:23.120><c> leasesc> different types of leases different types
• typec><02:39:44.800><c> ofc><02:39:44.960><c> certificationsc> interpreting the type of certifications

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 702, which would change how extra or special duty pay for retired police officers is treated for retirement and work-limit purposes. Supporters argued the bill would let retirees work more special-duty hours, helping municipalities fill traffic-detail and similar assignments without added state cost, and said it would not prohibit retirees from working but would simply stop those hours from counting toward the return-to-work threshold. Opponents argued the change would be inconsistent with the retirement system’s 2011 reforms, could increase pension liabilities, and would treat the same compensation differently for active employees and retirees. Members also discussed whether the bill would affect current and future retirees, the role of municipalities, and whether the policy amounted to “policing for profit.” The subcommittee ultimately voted 3-2 to recommend inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB 702, sending it to the full committee with that recommendation. The committee then discussed House Bill 581, which would create a Group Three retirement plan for new state employees hired after the bill’s effective date. The chair outlined a housekeeping amendment to delay implementation, moving the effective date to January 1, 2026, and noted a sponsor amendment addressing health insurance group inclusion and medical and surgical benefits so those benefits would not be put at risk for the new group. Testimony and discussion focused on the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution, with supporters citing Michigan examples and arguing the bill would help recruit and retain employees while giving them more flexibility. Opponents said the change could weaken retirement security and increase unfunded liability, though supporters responded that the bill still requires employer contributions toward accrued liability and is intended to keep the state on track to pay off its unfunded liability by 2039. The transcript ends with continued discussion of the bill and no final vote shown on HB 581.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:48:51.440><c> budgetc><00:48:51.760><c> forc><00:48:52.000><c> thisc><00:48:52.160><c> type
• c><00:48:52.400><c> ofc> governor's budget for this type of governor's budget for this type of facility
• c><00:53:12.640><c> acuityc><00:53:13.280><c> treatmentc><00:53:13.760><c> typec><00:53:14.000
• an appendicitis attack<00:54:26.559><c> somec><00:54:26.800><c> typec><00:54:26.960><c> ofc><00
• 54:36.400><c> thesec><00:54:36.800><c> typec><00:54:37.040><c> ofc> treatment.

Keywords: 0:00:01 Call to Order and Roll Call 0:01:19 NKU Capital Project Update 0:38:57 DJJ High Acuity Services Update 1:03:53 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The interim Budget Review Subcommittee for Justice and Judiciary received an update on Northern Kentucky University’s capital project to house the Northern Kentucky Medical Examiner’s Office and the Northern Kentucky Crime Lab in the former Highland Heights Civic Center building on NKU’s campus. NKU and Justice Cabinet staff described the project timeline: the building was identified in late 2022, lease terms were agreed to in early 2023, a pre-construction evaluation agreement was executed in May 2023, the General Assembly authorized $21 million in April 2024, and the lease and construction agreement were finalized in spring 2026. The project is now being prepared for bid, with construction expected to start in August and occupancy targeted for January 2028. About $1 million has been spent so far on design and related investigations. Testimony emphasized that the vacant building was structurally sound but required major upgrades, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roof, windows, a generator, specialized mechanical systems, security, and geothermal work to meet the needs of two separate operations sharing one facility. NKU said it is contributing $3.7 million to the project. Committee members asked about the condition of the building, the urgency of the project, and why the process took so long. Justice Cabinet and real properties officials said the medical examiner’s office had been shut down since roughly late 2017 or 2018, that the state had first sought funding in the 2022 budget for staffing, a lease, and equipment, and that it took time to find a suitable leased location because the facility has highly specialized requirements. Members also asked about operating costs, annual lease costs, and the impact of the office’s absence on families and counties in Northern Kentucky. Officials said the lease cost is based on NKU’s expected maintenance-related expenses, while utilities and staffing are covered through the Office of the State Medical Examiner or Kentucky State Police, with seven medical examiner positions funded in House Bill 500 and two additional KSP positions requested for the crime lab. They explained that, until the new facility opens, bodies from Northern Kentucky are generally transported to Louisville for autopsy, with transportation costs borne by the coroner’s office. No votes were taken, but the committee requested follow-up information, including lease cost numbers and additional details on facility usage and timing.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><00:14:34.240><c> typec> that includes reimbursement for any type that includes reimbursement for
• any type of<00:14:34.959><c> mc><00:14:35.360><c> umc><00:14:35.440><c> anyc><00:14:35.680><c>
• typec><00:14:35.839><c> ofc><00:14:36.000><c> travelc><00:14:36.240><c> youc><00:14:36.480><c
• ><c> ofc><00:23:12.960><c> waivers,c><00:23:14.400><c> umc> waivers, different types of waivers
• 00.080><c> typesc><00:24:00.400><c> ofc><00:24:00.640><c> groups,c><00:24:01.200><c> peoplec>

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call – 00:00:00 Introduction of Board Members – 00:02:04 Overview of the Purpose and Goals of the Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Board – 00:12:46 Medicaid Legislative Update - 00:20:26 Discussion of Next Steps and Future Meeting Dates – 01:04:06 Adjournment – 01:06:37, 958, all

Summary: The first meeting of the Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board opened with Chair Ken Fleming and Co-Chair Rocky Adams welcoming members, explaining the board’s purpose, and introducing the diverse membership of legislators, providers, advocates, and state officials. Fleming said the board would meet monthly, allow public comment at the end of meetings, and operate transparently with materials posted online and distributed in advance. Both chairs emphasized that the board’s work would focus on improving Medicaid outcomes, efficiency, and oversight, while preparing for possible federal changes and avoiding premature assumptions about what Congress may do. Members then gave brief introductions describing their backgrounds in medicine, nursing, hospital administration, behavioral health, insurance, budgeting, pharmacy, and Medicaid administration. Several noted direct experience with Medicaid populations or managed care, including the Department for Medicaid Services commissioner, health plan representatives, hospital and clinic leaders, and legislators with health care backgrounds. The board also heard from Stephanie Bates of the LRC Office of Health Data Analytics, who said her office supports the General Assembly with health-related data, policy, and research and would serve as a resource to the board. Bates then began a presentation on Medicaid basics, explaining that House Bill 695 created the board and that the presentation would cover eligibility, enrollment, covered benefits, waivers, managed care, the budget, and the federal reconciliation bill. She described Medicaid eligibility as complex, noted that Kentucky had more than 1.4 million enrollees, and explained enrollment churn and the unwinding of pandemic-era continuous coverage. She also outlined mandatory and optional Medicaid benefits, the requirement that services be medically necessary and provided by enrolled providers, and the main waiver types used in Kentucky, including 1115, 1915(b), and 1915(c) waivers. No votes or formal actions were taken at this meeting beyond organizational setup and receiving the initial informational presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• changing any policy to ensure that all types<00:24:45.840><c> ofc><00:24:46.000><c> deliveryc><00
• :24:46.400><c> systemsc><00:24:46.799><c> arec><00:24:47.039><c> availablec> types of delivery
• ><c> thosec><00:49:37.119><c> typesc><00:49:37.359><c> ofc><00:49:37.520><c> benefitsc><00:49
• :38.319><c> canc> does is says those types of benefits can does is says those types of benefits can
• c><01:09:34.400><c> name,c><01:09:34.640><c> image,c> the same type of thing. name, image, the

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> thec><00:51:38.880><c> typesc><00:51:39.200><c> ofc><00:51:39.760><c> endangermentc> is
• c><01:18:19.920><c> theyc><01:18:20.239><c> arec> The type of welfare proceeding they are The type
• c><01:27:49.520><c> Ic> types of evaluations. Okay. Thank you. I types of evaluations. Okay.
• <c> typesc><01:28:26.080><c> ofc><01:28:26.239><c> evaluationsc> and is aware of the types of evaluations
• 49.679><c> identicalc><02:02:50.080><c> typesc><02:02:50.400><c> ofc> services the identical types

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened with Senate Bill 22-FN, which would expand child care licensing background checks so the Department of Health and Human Services can receive fuller criminal history information, including pending charges and other non-conviction records, similar to the system already used for school staff. Grant Bossi, for Senator Pearl, and DHHS officials Melissa Clement and Christine Sheay testified in support, saying the bill closes a gap that can allow people with disqualifying charges to work with children. They explained that the FBI record is a snapshot in time, that juvenile records are not included, and that the bill would apply to child care programs including residential group homes. Questions focused on what “confidential criminal history” means and how often checks are repeated; DHHS said checks are done every five years or sooner if new charge information is received. The hearing on SB 22 was then closed. The committee then took up Senate Bill 23-FN, which would expand the child endangerment statute and remove the word “purposely” from part of the language. Senator Pat Long said the bill is intended to strengthen protection for children and allow more serious conduct to be charged appropriately. Testimony from law enforcement, including Executive Counselor Dave Wheeler, Sergeant Ryan Rooney of Nashua Police, and Nicholas Georgulis of Manchester Police, supported the bill as a way to distinguish routine misdemeanor cases from the most egregious abuse and neglect cases, such as children living in squalor or being exposed to severe danger. Wheeler and some members raised concerns that the language could be vague or overbroad and cited a prior Manchester firearm-in-a-car arrest as an example of possible unintended consequences; supporters responded that the bill still requires knowingly violating a duty of care and that the serious bodily injury or death standard limits its reach. Rooney also described a fentanyl overdose case involving an 11-year-old and said the current misdemeanor charge did not fully reflect the seriousness of the conduct. The committee recessed SB 23 briefly to open and close SB 161, then returned to SB 23, which remained under hearing with no final vote taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> specificallyc><00:06:59.840><c> thec><00:07:00.160><c> typesc><00:07:00.479><c> ofc><00:
• types<00:07:26.240><c> ofc><00:07:26.560><c> evidencec><00:07:26.880><c> orc><00:07:27.120><c>
• thesec><00:07:27.440><c> specificc> types of evidence or these specific types of evidence or these
• c><00:24:15.520><c> outc><00:24:15.679><c> ofc> type of reporting coming out of type of reporting
• > notc><00:27:30.799><c> somec><00:27:31.360><c> typec><00:27:31.679><c> ofc> or not or whether

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The commission heard argument on a renewed motion to compel discovery and related sanctions in an ethics case. Enforcement counsel said the respondent had provided incomplete and inconsistent discovery responses, including no authenticated medical records, and asked the commission to compel full interrogatory answers, bar the respondent from relying on unsupported medical claims at hearing, allow subpoenas for medical records and an LRC report, and continue the December 2 hearing. Respondent’s counsel replied that the defense had complied with discovery, that medical records were being withheld for reasons previously discussed, and that no outstanding discovery remained. The next matter was enforcement counsel’s motion in limine, which sought to exclude a wide range of evidence as irrelevant to the three ethics charges already found to have probable cause. Counsel argued the hearing should focus only on whether the respondent intimidated Fox’s, offered a favor in exchange for a donation, and engaged in inappropriate conduct while intoxicated in his office, and not on complainants’ motives, media coverage, bullying, religious discrimination claims, LRC policies, or other legislators’ conduct. He also argued that any claim of mental or physical condition should be excluded absent supporting medical proof. Respondent’s counsel opposed the motion, saying the excluded topics went to witness credibility, bias, motive, and context, and that LRC materials and testimony from additional witnesses were important to the defense. Commission members questioned both sides about the breadth of the motion in limine and whether any topics could be agreed to as irrelevant. Counsel for the respondent maintained that some challenged topics, including Lexington media coverage and broader legislative practices, were relevant to credibility and context. Enforcement counsel responded that even if such conduct were common, it would not excuse a violation of the ethics code. No final ruling or vote was announced in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• c> comec><00:03:45.879><c> forc><00:03:46.080><c> allc><00:03:46.280><c> typesc><00:03:46.480
• ><c> ofc> place where people come for all types of place where people come for all types of occasions
• /c> type questions if that's okay okay um type questions if that's okay okay um thank<00:06:30.800><c
• ><c> lookc><00:37:28.680><c> atc><00:37:28.880><c> thec><00:37:29.079><c> typec><00:37:29.240
• ><c> ofc><00:37:29.400><c> workc> it when we look at the type of work it when we look at the type

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Often when we get this<00:09:33.760><c> typec><00:09:33.920><c> ofc><00:09:34.080><c> information
• ,c><00:09:34.640><c> wec><00:09:34.880><c> sharec><00:09:35.120><c> itc> this type of information
• , we share it this type of information, we share it with<00:09:35.440><c> lawc><00:09:35.600><c> enforcement
• /c><01:27:24.480><c> aren'tc><01:27:24.800><c> politicalc><01:27:25.199><c> typesc><01:27:26.080
• ><c> whoc> citizens who aren't political types who citizens who aren't political types who are<01:27

Bills: HF1151, HF1239, HF1240, HF2020, HF2514, HF2515, HF2451

Keywords: Compensation Council, salaries, state officials, judicial compensation, legislative process, public funds, misuse, law enforcement, accountability, state government, legislative auditor, compliance, transparency, retirement benefits, health insurance, dependents, state employees, Medicare, legislative studies, government oversight