Video & Transcript Research : 'volume cap'

Page 5 of 358
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee Apr 6th, 2026 at 10:30 am

A&B Natural Resources Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • and hesitation, not just within this committee but within our membership as a whole on not only the volume
  • And right now, they're currently hitting their cap around August.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Transaction limits are changed in the substitute to $3,000 a day with a fee cap of 12%.
  • Additionally, transaction fee caps do not prevent consumer fraud, and in combination with transaction
  • Such restrictions on the transaction limits and the fee caps look forward to working with you all and
  • Vermont has a $1,000 per day transaction limit and a 3% cap. What happened in Vermont?
  • Is it the $1,000 limit there in California, the 15% cap, or...? Both, both equally.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce Apr 15th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • a hypothetical, if a kiosk processes $3,000 worth of Bitcoin in any particular month with a 15% fee cap
  • They cap fees at 15% and a $1,000 per day transaction limit.
  • I mean, examples like the currency exchange brokers and online ticket brokers do not have any caps on
  • Vermont has a $1,000 per day transaction limit and a 3% cap.
  • Vermont has a $1,000 per day transaction limit and a 3% cap. What happened in Vermont?
Summary: The committee took up a long list of pending bills before moving to several bills on the day’s posting. It reported favorably SB 438, SB 512, SB 647, SB 648, SB 715, SB 758, SB 1964, SB 2121, SB 2145, SB 2167, SB 2330, SB 2349, SB 2443, SB 2629, SB 2702, SB 1495, and SB 2268, with several of those adopted from committee substitutes. Some measures were sent to the local and uncontested calendar, while others were reported to the full Senate. Votes on the pending-business bills were generally strong, though SB 715 and SB 2330 drew recorded opposition; SB 647 and SB 648 had one member present not voting because of confusion over the deed-related bills. A major discussion centered on SB 715, which would establish a reliability standard and penalties/incentives for generation resources. Senator Sparks said the committee substitute would avoid unfairly penalizing existing dispatchable generation, allow wind and solar to qualify through storage or backup power, give the PUC flexibility to set standards and phase in the program, and exempt switchable units. Critics raised concerns that it could raise consumer costs and destabilize the market, while supporters argued it would improve reliability. The committee substitute was adopted and the bill was reported out 6-4. The committee also heard testimony on SB 2330, dealing with payroll deduction for association dues, where the author said the bill would end state involvement in dues collection except for first responders covered by meet-and-confer agreements. Members questioned why teachers and other employees were treated differently, and the bill was reported out 6-5. Other notable bills included SB 2864 on building-integrated photovoltaics, SB 1012 on sale of surplus state property, SB 2221 on fraudulent UCC filings, SB 1705 regulating cryptocurrency kiosks with licensing, transaction limits, fee caps, and a 72-hour hold, SB 1181 on combative sports licensing, SB 2586 on HOA transparency, SB 2075 as a TDLR cleanup bill, and SB 383 restricting offshore wind interconnection based on impacts to shipping, wildlife, and coastal interests. Several of these were left pending after testimony, with SB 1705 drawing both law enforcement support and industry concerns over the fee caps and limits.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that cap would apply. The, the 36 month.
  • Well, I think the setting an arbitrary cap in of itself.
  • Is there any existing cap, uh, that utilities have to follow, or there is not any existing cap that.
  • And To set an arbitrary cap.
  • If a a cap is set, then that balance shifts.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • that quantity, and you're comparing that to the water you're able to sell, thereby creating a leak volume
  • mix of different supplies at their endpoint, so I understand the comparison with the Vista Ridge volume
  • They need to have their permit cut, and it needs to be reduced by the amount of volume that's in excess
  • Like if you have an applicant for a loan and they have a high volume of water loss, what factors... in
  • and transport permits to projects utilizing state funds or bonds, which result in total permitted volumes
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that cap would apply.
  • Is there any existing cap that utilities...
  • There is not any existing cap that utilities have to follow.
  • If a cap is set, then that boundary is established.
  • Although I do understand the cap, and it's very well intended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 6th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • During the regular session, when we lowered the rate and capped it at 3.5, we had a long runway, a long
  • That $331 million does not come under this cap. That's money that's outside the cap.
Bills: SB15, SB9, SB7, SB1, SB2, SB67, SB15, SB9, SB7