Video & Transcript Research : 'supervision fees'

Page 5 of 482
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 12th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They would still have to pay the fee to get the new license.
  • There'll be a small fee applied to that, but at the end of the day, this is gonna make wait times shorter
  • However, current law does not provide the same protections to community supervision. and corrections
  • special investigator, employee, or official of a correctional facility, parole officer, community supervision
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I paid the filing fee, the excess fees that you want to give away.
  • I paid the excess fees for a guardian for my father.
  • I paid the excess fees for a guardian for my father because he was being abused.
  • I have supervision status in Texas.
  • or changing a fee.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence heard testimony on Senate Bill 1015, which would clarify that the comptroller is responsible for distributing excess judicial fund payments back to statutory probate courts. Judge Guy Herman testified in support, saying the bill would help ensure probate courts receive funding they are entitled to, while Ed Heimlich testified against the bill with broad criticism of probate courts and judicial practices. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2933, which would add elder abuse training to required judicial education for several categories of judges and judicial officers; Dr. Bruce Hargrave supported the bill, citing the prevalence and underreporting of elder abuse and the need for judges to recognize warning signs. No votes were taken on either of those bills, and SB 2933 was left pending. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 38, an eviction-related bill, and Vice Chair Hayes described two agreed floor amendments: one limiting the summary disposition procedure to forcible entry and detainer cases involving squatters, and another requiring a notice to pay rent or vacate for tenants who had been timely payers but missed a payment. After discussion, the committee voted 6-4 to report SB 38 without amendments. The committee also adopted or advanced a series of other bills and resolutions, including SB 293, SB 1141, SB 1448, SB 1536, SB 1558, SB 1838, SB 1940, SB 2127, SB 53, SB 251, SB 311, SB 387, SB 441 (with a substitute), SB 1164, SB 1335, SB 1574 (with a substitute), SB 1719, SB 1760, SB 1839, SB 1923 (with a substitute), SB 2807, and SJR 27 (with a substitute). Most measures were reported favorably on largely party-line or near-unanimous votes, with a few close votes on SB 942, SB 311, SB 2807, and SJR 27. SB 942, relating to retroactive child support beginning at conception, initially failed 5-5 but was reconsidered and then passed 6-5. The committee adjourned after completing its agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I paid the filing fee, the excess fees that you want to give away.
  • I paid the excess fees for a guardian for my father.
  • I paid the excess fees for a guardian for my father because he was being abused.
  • I have supervision status in Texas.
  • or changing a fee.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • With certain documents on release or discharge, there is a change in a fee.
  • Members, the budget process for community supervision and corrections includes in-depth standard guidelines
  • Across four different funding lines and outside funding sources, to ensure local Community Supervision
  • my name is Allison Martinez, and I serve as a director for the Webb and Zapata County Community Supervision
  • Senate Bill 663 addresses an area of community supervision administration that has long needed clarity
Bills: SB663, SB958
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • A standardized $25 fee per entity for cases where electronic service is not available ensures a more
  • Currently, an expunction is filed by the petitioner and it's a $350 filing fee.
  • If they retain an attorney, they have to pay that return. ...attorney's fees, and then they pay $15 per
  • Our bill would repeal all those fees as long as the agencies are providing us or the petitioners with
  • The first is that the fee; there is a fee under this bill that is mandatory and it's not... ...discretionary
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 31st, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate added a section 8-2 which mirrors... the language in A-1 to make certain that property as well as fee
  • implementation, the complained of section contains two exceptions to the awarding of costs and attorney's fees
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 2/25/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • That flexibility allows aides in child care centers to supervise children independently for up to 25%
  • children independently for up supervise children independently for up to<00:04:03.439> 25%<00
  • importantly allowing aids to supervise importantly allowing aids to supervise up<00:08:36.000>
  • She's lovely, but she's got a lot of adults around her supervising her.
  • a lot of adults around her supervising a lot of adults around her supervising her<00:56:14.480><
Bills: HF1247, HF628
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, the budget process for the Community Supervision and Corrections Department Include in-depth
  • To ensure local community supervision and correction departments are not overlooked, Senate Bill 663
  • Senate bill 663 addresses an area of community supervision administration that has long needed clarity
  • So it was used not just for supervision. but for investigation of new crimes.
  • It clarifies the supervision responsibilities for Max, including the removals of attorneys. As Mr.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • To ensure local community supervision and corrections departments are not overlooked, Senate Bill 663
  • Senate Bill 663 addresses an area of community supervision administration that has long needed clarity
  • Senate Bill 1020 clarifies the information-sharing process for personal bond and supervision officers
  • So it was used not just for supervision, but for investigation of new crimes.
  • It clarifies the supervision responsibilities from MACs, including the removals of attorneys, as Mr.
Summary: The committee heard several criminal justice bills, with testimony largely focused on public safety, court procedures, and local criminal justice administration. SB 2371 would expand mandatory skimmer-reporting requirements from gas pumps to ATMs, point-of-sale systems, and virtual currency kiosks, with the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center saying centralized reporting would improve investigations, preserve evidence, and help identify organized criminal groups. SB 2581 would repeal a special law governing commissary funds in certain large counties; the sponsor and the Sheriff’s Association said it would restore parity with other counties while keeping spending subject to audit and inmate-benefit limits. Both bills were laid out and left pending after testimony, with no public witnesses opposing them at the hearing. The committee also heard SB 330, which would require voter approval before counties over a certain size reduce prosecutor funding, similar to an existing law for law enforcement budgets. Supporters argued prosecutors are essential to public safety and need stable funding, while an opponent from the Texas Civil Rights Project said the bill would restrict local budget flexibility and impose costly elections. SB 663 would remove district judges’ approval role for community supervision and corrections department budgets, replacing it with judge review after TDCJ-CJAD approval; probation officials said the change would reduce delays and confusion without reducing judicial oversight. SB 1020 would require more immediate sharing of ankle-monitor violation information and clarify that such records are not judicial work product; the Harris County DA’s office and Crime Stoppers supported it, citing inconsistent local practices and delays that can hinder prosecutions. The committee then took up SB 1164 on emergency detention and court-ordered mental health services. The bill, from the Texas Judicial Commission on Mental Health, would update emergency detention forms, clarify officer duties, allow filings in the county where a person is apprehended or located, and add a factor related to a person’s inability to recognize symptoms or appreciate treatment risks. Supporters included family members, law enforcement, and mental health and judicial witnesses who described cases where earlier intervention might have prevented tragedy; opponents warned the broader language could be misused and emphasized due process and the need for dangerousness to remain the standard. SB 2111 on indigent defense would expand access to counsel at first hearings, strengthen managed assigned counsel programs, create internships and fellowships, and adjust other defense-related procedures; the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and county defense program leaders supported it, while the committee substitute removed some provisions to reduce fiscal impact. Finally, SB 2383 would let recently retired DPS officers return to work in limited roles to help address staffing shortages, and SB 2797 would create reciprocal discovery requirements for criminal cases; prosecutors and some committee members said it would reduce trial surprise and improve truth-seeking, while others questioned whether the bill fully matched the state’s disclosure obligations and whether it could burden defense rights. Several bills were left pending after testimony, and the committee established a quorum later in the hearing.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 2524, Representative Cook's bill sponsored by Vice Chair Senator Johnson, about the recovery of fees
  • Bill 2524, Representative Cook's bill sponsored by Vice Chair Senator Johnson, About the recovery of fees
Summary: The committee considered several House bills dealing with family law and civil procedure. House Bill 1916, concerning a court’s jurisdiction in suits to divide property not divided on dissolution of marriage, was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 1973, addressing proof of the identity of a child’s parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, was also adopted with a committee substitute, reported favorably 4-0, and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 2524, on recovery of fees, court costs, and expenses in family law proceedings, and House Bill 2530, on special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, each received favorable 4-0 votes and were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 3180, which was reported favorably 4-0 and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The most detailed discussion centered on House Bill 40, relating to updates to business courts. Senator Hughes explained a committee amendment that made conforming changes requested by the Finance Committee and removed language creating two new judgeships, replacing it with a different judge allocation. The amendment was adopted, the amended committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. At the end of the meeting, members briefly clarified procedural details about the House Bill 40 amendment and then closed out the agenda. The committee also noted a correction to an earlier reference to Bartleby the Scrivener, and the Chair recessed the Committee on Jurisprudence subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) May 21st, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The 20% or 15% goes for the attorney fees that the delinquent taxpayer pays to be sued.
  • And I think you said lowering the fees didn't work. Just something about that. What was that?
  • fees were both reasonable and necessary.
  • Since 2011, these fees have been restricted, and there are enforcement rules for them.
  • Since 2011, these fees have been restricted, and there are enforcement rules for them.
Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I have a question on removing the cap on the fee. It says you're removing the cap for fees.
  • I mean, the cost will be appropriate to what the licensure fee is. That's what you're asking.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 2282 by Representative Janie Lopez is an arrest warrant fee increase.
  • The current $50 fee was set over 30 years ago.
  • I urge you to support this bill and bring this fee into modern era. Thank you for your time.
  • Warrant fees make tickets much more expensive only for those who do not have the money to pay.
  • Local probation offices lack the authority to provide supervision.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 25th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The new entity would collect license fees. You'll look at what those license fees are.
  • They make my fees higher and open me up to... They make my fees higher and open me up to fines.
  • The issue of fees, that is correct. Those fees are going to be set by the new director.
  • What those fees are and...
  • Setting of the fees now, so all of these boards pretty much said they own fees.
Bills: SB174, SB180, HB196, HB25, SB193, HB25