Video & Transcript Research : 'manure storage'

Page 5 of 170
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 4/14/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> ethical solar and storage sales. ethical solar and storage sales.
  • Next we have Assistant Commissioner Lissa Pollish. and storage market must be uh regulated and storage
  • </c><01:15:01.000><c> for</c> access to home solar and storage for access to home solar and storage for
  • It's enabling 200 MW of new solar and 300 MW of battery storage.
  • It's enabling 200 MW of new solar and 300 MW of battery storage.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/20/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's a significant amount of new water storage on the landscape.
  • And that's a significant amount of new water storage on the landscape.
  • Our projects storage on the landscape.
  • </c> their water quality and storage their water quality and storage program.<00:59:34.079><c> The</c
  • So, we really concentrate on the floodwater storage portion of the projects.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-HHS, AEN DEFER Public Hearings 02-02-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • So first up, we have relating to underground storage tanks and... excuse me, anybody testify?
  • first up we have relating<00:15:51.759><c> to</c><00:15:52.000><c> underground</c><00:15:52.639><c> storage
  • </c><00:15:53.120><c> tanks</c> relating to underground storage tanks relating to underground storage
  • So with regards to underground storage tanks, the responsible party is responsible for cleanup, and if
Summary: The joint Senate Agriculture and Environment and Health and Human Services hearing opened with SB 2093, which would require the fuel tank advisory committee to meet at least quarterly and provide funding. The Department of Health offered written testimony, and multiple supporters, including the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, Sierra Club, and a public member of the advisory committee, said more frequent meetings were needed to keep Red Hill cleanup, water testing, and public engagement front and center. Senators asked about public participation and whether the bill should also require meetings outside business hours; testifiers urged at least one evening or weekend meeting to improve access. No vote was taken during the discussion shown. The committee then heard SB 2095, creating a PFAS working group within the Department of Health to study PFAS and related chemicals and report to the Legislature. DOH supported the concept but requested amendments and funding, while the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity deferred to DOH. The Board of Water Supply supported the measure and asked to be included in the working group. Members asked about the bill’s reference to “other residuals,” and DOH explained it could refer to remaining PFAS components in soil, water, or other media. The discussion emphasized the widespread and long-lasting nature of PFAS contamination. Next, the committee considered SB 2046 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill-related cleanup. DOH and the Board of Water Supply testified, and a long list of community and environmental groups supported the bill. Testifiers argued the Navy caused the problem and should be held accountable for cleanup, while one witness said the bill was necessary because the Navy had delayed meaningful remediation. Senators asked whether the bill’s “large landowner” language could include the state or counties under existing statutes; DOH said it would check and later explained that cleanup responsibility generally falls first on the responsible party, then on large landowners if no responsible party exists, with the Navy currently understood to own Red Hill. The hearing then moved to SB 2096 on wastewater management, which the Department of Land and Natural Resources supported, noting PFAS can harm marine resources, and DOH’s wastewater branch offered comments. SB 2127 on water pollution drew support from Agra Business Development Corporation and opposition from the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and others. The main debate centered on runoff, NPDES permitting, and whether the bill could unfairly affect agricultural and public entities; senators and witnesses discussed how heavy rainfall, cesspools, and mixed land uses complicate responsibility and compliance. The transcript ends with the committee still in discussion on SB 2127, with no final votes or actions shown in the excerpt.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Feb 27th, 2025

Alabama Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • space as the holding grow and storage space as the holding grow and storage space as the holding grow
  • more space for records 2005 provided more space for records 2005 provided more space for records storage
  • exhibits educational and public storage exhibits educational and public storage exhibits educational
  • free boxes and levels asset free boxes and levels asset free boxes and folders controll access to storage
  • areas folders controll access to storage areas folders controll access to storage areas fire protection
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And second, alternative manure management systems reduce methane formation by changing how manure is
  • to have a lot of manure.
  • Wet manure is what actually produces methane. So it's actually the liquefaction of manure...
  • What manure is what actually produces methane?
  • So first, the Alternative Manure Management Program, or AMP, helps farmers reduce the amount of manure
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And second, alternative manure management systems reduce methane formation, And second, alternative manure
  • in a lagoon, you're going to have a lot of manure.
  • Wet manure is what actually produces methane. So it's actually the liquefaction of manure...
  • What manure is what actually produces methane?
  • So first, the Alternative Manure Management Program, or AMP, helps farmers reduce the amount of manure
Summary: The joint informational hearing examined how agricultural programs have used cap-and-invest funding and what role agriculture should play in future climate investments. The chairs opened by noting that agriculture had been largely left out of the cap-and-invest reauthorization, despite prior support through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, and framed the hearing around climate-smart agriculture, food security, rural vitality, and the need for measurable co-benefits such as water savings, soil health, and air quality improvements. The first panel included CDFA Deputy Secretary Virginia Jamison and LAO analyst Helen Kirsten. Jamison described CDFA’s climate-smart portfolio, including the Healthy Soils Program, SWEEP, the Alternative Manure Management Program, and dairy methane reduction efforts, saying roughly $727 million has supported these programs and produced estimated reductions of 31 million metric tons of CO2e, 1.6 million acre-feet of water savings, and about 4,000 projects. She emphasized technical assistance, oversubscription of the programs, and the need for continued investment and better measurement/verification. Kirsten outlined the cap-and-invest structure, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, and the state’s emissions inventory, noting agriculture is about 8% of California’s GHG emissions and that funding for tier-three programs may remain constrained. She also said prior LAO work found the programs have significant reduction potential but that some estimated benefits may be overstated, recommending further evaluation. The second panel featured UC researchers Alexandra Hill and Ermi Kibreab, who presented on the economic importance of California’s working landscapes and on dairy methane reduction pathways. Hill said working landscapes are a major part of the state and national economy, with agriculture driving most of the sector’s sales and jobs. Kibreab explained that dairy is central to methane reduction because it accounts for a large share of agricultural methane emissions, and described herd efficiency, digesters, alternative manure management, and emerging feed additives as complementary strategies. He said digesters and other incentive-supported measures are helping California move toward its methane goals, while noting feed additives such as 3-NOP and seaweed-based approaches could offer additional reductions in the future. The third panel brought contrasting views from environmental advocates, farmers, and industry representatives. Phoebe Seaton argued that further state funding for dairy digesters is not environmentally or economically justified, citing concerns about methane, nitrous oxide, groundwater impacts, odors, and high cost per ton reduced. Brian Shobe of CalCAN supported continued funding for programs like AMP, SWEEP, and Healthy Soils, saying they provide multiple co-benefits and that farmers need stable, incentive-based support to comply with climate and water regulations. Cannon Michael of Bowles Farming Company described his farm’s investments in organic and regenerative practices, composting, drip irrigation, solar, habitat management, and workforce programs, and said consistent funding helps farms plan and remain viable. Tricia Gerringer of the Agricultural Council of California urged funding for FPIP, the Farmer Program, methane reduction programs, and sustainable ag waste management, arguing they deliver immediate, measurable reductions and co-benefits. Members and witnesses debated the relative merits of digesters versus alternative manure management, the role of regenerative agriculture, and whether agriculture should be treated as a distinct policy category. No votes were taken; the hearing concluded with public comment supporting agricultural climate funding and a request to include agriculture in broader cap-and-invest discussions.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And second, alternative manure management systems reduce methane formation by changing how manure is
  • in a lagoon, you're going to have a lot of manure.
  • Wet manure is what actually produces methane.
  • He began with the Alternative Manure Management Program, or AMP.
  • He said the Alternative Manure Management Program, or AMP, helps farmers reduce the amount of manure
Summary: The joint informational hearing examined how California agricultural programs have used cap-and-invest funding and what role agriculture should play in future climate investments. Committee chairs framed the issue as balancing climate goals, food production, rural economic vitality, and the fact that agriculture was not specifically funded in the recent cap-and-invest reauthorization. The first panel from CDFA and the Legislative Analyst’s Office described the state’s climate-smart agriculture portfolio, including Healthy Soils, SWEEP, the Dairy Methane Reduction Program, and Alternative Manure Management, and explained that GGRF revenues are now more constrained and may not fully support all tiered programs. LAO emphasized that agriculture is about 8% of California’s emissions, that most ag emissions are outside the cap, and that the Legislature should consider program effectiveness, the role of incentives, and GGRF priorities. CDFA testified that roughly $727 million has been invested in its flagship climate-smart ag programs, producing estimated reductions of 31 million metric tons of CO2e, 1.6 million acre-feet of water savings, and about 4,000 projects. The department said technical assistance is essential because farmers face risk when adopting new practices, and noted new Proposition 4 funding for Healthy Soils, SWEEP, and a regional farm equipment sharing program. University researchers then presented economic and methane-reduction analyses: UC Berkeley’s Dr. Hill described working landscapes as a major economic driver, while UC Davis’ Dr. Kibreab outlined dairy methane reduction pathways, including herd efficiency, digesters, alternative manure management, and emerging feed additives such as 3-NOP and seaweed, arguing that incentive-based programs have helped California move toward its methane goals. A later panel featured sharply different views on dairy digesters. Phoebe Seton argued that digesters worsen air and water quality, encourage manure liquefaction, and are an inefficient use of public funds, while CalCAN’s Brian Schobey and agricultural representatives said programs like AMP, SWEEP, Healthy Soils, FPIP, and the Farmer Program deliver measurable emissions reductions plus co-benefits such as water savings, lower energy costs, and improved air quality. Farm and industry witnesses stressed that stable, incentive-based funding helps family farms remain viable, supports co-investment, and should be treated as a partnership rather than a regulatory stick. No votes or formal actions were taken; the hearing ended with public comment and a continued call for future funding and policy discussion.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Agriculture committee considers HF1503 3/5/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do have a question about this as far as a manure composting air quality situation.
  • I do have a question about this as far as a manure composting air quality situation.
  • I do have a question about this as far as a manure composting air quality situation.
  • I do have a question about this as far as a manure composting air quality situation.
  • I do have a question about this as far as a manure composting air quality situation.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/20/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the regulatory piece is the solid waste, hazardous waste, and above-ground storage tanks work.
  • This encompasses the air quality program, water quality, hazardous waste, underground storage tanks,
  • He also mentioned the bird flu and said it might be moving because of manure flying through the air and
  • </c><01:08:28.440><c> flying</c> might be moving because of manure flying might be moving because of
  • manure flying through<01:08:29.040><c> the</c><01:08:29.199><c> air</c><01:08:30.120><c> and</c><01:08
Bills: HF276, HF413, HF411
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Legacy Finance Committee 2/12/25

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:26:58.600><c> much</c><00:26:58.799><c> nitrate</c><00:26:59.200><c> and</c><00:26:59.520><c> manure
  • </c><00:27:00.520><c> uh</c><00:27:00.679><c> into</c> like too much nitrate and manure uh into like
  • It can include removing old fuel storage tanks, educating residents and businesses about spills and the
  • on their own, they have been modifying the feedlot permit, which involves the land application of manure
  • So there are some tighter restrictions on when and how you can apply manure in certain places at certain
Keywords: 1183, house
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture Oct 28th, 2025

Agriculture

Transcript Highlights:
  • discuss today, like the chairman mentioned, we're discussing biosolids or sewage sludge or human manure
  • We're discussing biosolids, or sewage sludge, or human manure, or what is really human and industrial
  • I will use the word biosolids interchangeably with the common-use words sludge and human manure in my
  • So I'll mix it with municipal waste, human manure, biosolids, right?
  • Manure, the biosolids, whatever it may be, into that, getting those positive net outputs that you can
Summary: The committee hearing focused on biosolids, sewage sludge, and PFAS contamination, with the opening remarks and first three presenters arguing that land application of municipal sludge poses serious risks to soil, water, livestock, and human health. Representative Shaw cited EPA and state data on detected pollutants and PFAS in biosolids, while Denise Travick Poyer described her background in chemical engineering and PFAS work and said the EPA’s draft sewage sludge risk assessment shows unacceptable risk at very low PFOS/PFOA levels. She urged source reduction, more testing, and consideration of total organic fluorine, and noted examples from Michigan where industrial pretreatment and source reduction reduced PFAS in biosolids. Johnson County, Texas Commissioner Larry Woolley and Investigator Dana Ames presented a case study of alleged runoff from land-applied biosolids affecting a ranch, with high PFAS readings in soil, water, fish, cattle tissue, and a stillborn calf, and said the county and state had pursued investigations, lawsuits, and legislative responses. Sandra Trawick of Save Oklahoma Farms and Ranches argued that Oklahoma’s biosolids program relies heavily on Class B sludge, that current rules are outdated, and that land application exposes farms and rural communities to pathogens, chemicals, odors, flies, and runoff; she cited examples from Maine, Texas, Georgia, Michigan, and Oklahoma to support calls for stronger regulation or a ban. After the testimony, members asked about sampling methods, lab testing, EPA limits, and whether the cited PFAS blood levels were comparable to the soil and sludge measurements. Witnesses said the Johnson County samples were collected by a Texas A&M PhD contractor and tested at a single lab, and they explained that the EPA’s 4 parts per trillion figure applied to municipal drinking water standards. Questions also addressed whether sludge is incorporated into soil; Trawick said it had often been left on the surface, though she had seen better disking after public scrutiny. Members asked how biosolids compare with manure and feedlot waste, and witnesses responded that municipal sludge is more contaminated because it includes industrial, hospital, and household waste streams, unlike animal manure. The committee then moved to alternative solutions, hearing from Doug McKinney of Advanced Microbial Solutions, who promoted biological sludge removal using bacteria to reduce sludge volumes and avoid land application, citing cost savings for wastewater plants and correctional facilities. Jason Jepsen of Eden Energy followed with a pitch for an eight-stage waste-to-energy system that converts mixed waste into clean energy, biochar, and reusable products, framing waste as an asset and presenting his company’s technology as a no-land-application alternative.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Apr 23rd, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 3464 creates a statewide framework for regulating the energy storage devices, solar...
  • are currently on the orphaned and abandoned list to be used or repurposed for geothermal and energy storage
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Apr 23rd, 2026

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 3464 creates a statewide framework for regulating energy storage devices and solar energy
  • are currently on the orphaned and abandoned list to be used or repurposed for geothermal and energy storage
  • These activities are already allowed... ...for geothermal and energy storage.
Summary: The committee first considered the nomination of Russell Isaacs to the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Isaacs described his farming background and experience with cotton, corn, sorghum, and wheat, and said he regularly tests conservation technologies on his farm. Senators discussed his water-conservation experience and the value he could bring to the board. The nomination received 10 ayes and 0 nays and was advanced to the full Senate floor. Members then took up House Bill 3183, dealing with smart transmission technology and electric grid efficiency. Senator Murdoch explained that the bill had been difficult to negotiate and that the enacting clause was stricken so work could continue on a committee substitute. He said the technology would allow existing transmission towers to carry lighter, more efficient lines, reduce wildfire risk, and potentially lower long-term rates by easing congestion. Senators asked about costs, who pays, and whether ratepayers or large load users would bear the burden; an amendment changed language from “customer funded” to “large load user funded.” The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the bill 7 ayes to 3 nays. The committee also advanced several nominations and bills related to environmental and energy policy. Steve Mason was confirmed to the Environmental Quality Board by an 8-0 vote. House Bill 4316, which removes an old deadline that prevented nonprofit corporations from converting into water districts and accessing grant funding, passed 8-0. House Bill 4484, allowing discretionary use of state-owned or state-leased vehicles between employees’ homes and workplaces to save mileage costs, passed 9-0. House Bill 3464 created a statewide framework for energy storage and solar facilities; a motion to table an amendment failed, and the bill passed 10-0 after debate over landowner protections, decommissioning, fire safety, and dual-use agricultural concerns. The committee then passed House Bill 3173, the Well-Repurposing Act, 10-0, to allow orphaned and abandoned wells to be repurposed for geothermal and energy storage uses, with discussion about surface-owner rights and possible tweaks to the geothermal temperature definition. House Bill 3469, a measure easing surety requirements for smaller producers by allowing a stair-stepped compliance schedule, passed 9-0. Finally, House Bill 3989 was amended for drafting corrections and then passed 9-0; it relates to the one-megawatt load standard and uses actual load over a two-year period rather than plate load. The chair ended the meeting by thanking members and staff and adjourning the committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/05/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Poultry manure, of course, is much richer and higher in crop nutrients than, say, dairy manure or other
  • </c><00:45:52.240><c> are</c> typically say 50 miles uh for manur are typically say 50 miles uh for manur
  • </c><00:45:54.200><c> of</c> all are all different poultry manur of all are all different poultry manur
  • </c><00:45:59.599><c> or</c> crop nutrients than say Dairy manure or crop nutrients than say Dairy manure
  • , it doesn't have to be manure.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Chicken bill gets committee OK 3/23/26

Transcript Highlights:
  • And because it is in a confined space where manure will accumulate and where vegetation will not grow
  • And because it is in a confined space And because it is in a confined space where<00:04:11.040><c> manure
  • </c><00:04:11.519><c> manure</c><00:04:12.000><c> will</c><00:04:12.159><c> accumulate</c><00:04:12.799
  • ><c> and</c> where manure manure will accumulate and where manure manure will accumulate and where<00
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 4295, described by the author as the “Chicken Shift Bill,” which would address an unintended consequence of state feedlot regulations affecting backyard chicken coops. The bill would allow counties to adopt ordinances exempting small chicken coops, up to 24 chickens, from feedlot designation, while leaving counties free to set a lower limit or decline to act. The author and Wright County Administrator Greg Kryser testified in support, saying the measure would give local governments flexibility and resolve confusion for county feedlot officers. Kryser also explained the issue using animal-unit calculations to show how chickens in a coop could be treated differently from chickens at pasture. Representative Coulter raised a question about how a county ordinance would interact with a city ordinance on backyard chickens, and the chair said he did not know the answer but would look into it. Representative Grieman expressed support and noted the bill’s relevance to backyard chicken owners. The chair said the bill would be referred to the Environment Committee and suggested the jurisdictional question be clarified before further hearing. The author closed by reiterating the purpose of the bill and the phrase “the chickens come home to roost.” The committee then voted unanimously in favor of re-referring House File 4295 to the Environment Committee, and the motion passed.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/24/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • So we accrued long-term storage credits after we stored that water.
  • And you can see I added two photos that show the different types of storage facilities.
  • We have... ...of storage facilities.
  • So one way we can increase our bank of credits is through the purchase of long-term storage credits.
  • Nevada paid for the water storage.