Video & Transcript Research : 'housing development'

Page 5 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • That type of housing.
  • What it's saying is the developers that are doing the work to make sure these houses stay online for
  • I'm a development consultant in affordable housing, and I'm speaking on the bill, but I'd really like
  • House Bill 1226 is...
  • A TDHCA housing tax credit program allocates federal tax credits to housing developers.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Legislation from the 83rd session requires developers applying for the 4% housing tax credit to obtain
  • An additional hearing process in order to develop affordable housing.
  • Public hearing, which in the case of any other type of housing or commercial development or apartment
  • These are all needed affordable housing developments throughout the state. They serve...
  • By reducing the uncertainty surrounding RONO approvals, the bill promotes investment in housing development
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/4/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • housing and redevelopment authorities and community development agencies in the metro are treated, where
  • House File 3881. House File 3881.
  • affordable housing development locally. affordable housing development locally.
  • House.
  • opposes House File 3362. opposes House File 3362.
Summary: The committee met on March 4, 2026, and first approved the minutes from March 2 by voice vote. It then took up several Metropolitan Council agency bills, with members repeatedly moving to lay them over for possible inclusion or, in one case, to re-refer a bill to another committee. The first three bills discussed were House File 3884, House File 3881, and House File 3882, all presented as administrative or programmatic changes intended to streamline Met Council processes. House File 3884 would allow tribal governments and tribal development entities to apply directly for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Act grants and community tree planting grants, rather than applying through a city or other local government. Testimony from Met Council staff said the bill would simplify access and align the Met Council’s tree-planting program with existing DNR authority. House File 3881 would expand the Met Council’s contracting authority to include small businesses more broadly, require an annual report to the legislature on small-business contracting, and repeal a duplicative statute on certificates of compliance. House File 3882 would make a range of administrative cleanups, including removing an obsolete housing-bond review role, clarifying outdated statutory language, extending the review cycle for metropolitan significance rules from every two years to every 10 years, clarifying reporting and Livable Communities Act provisions, changing regional parks operations-and-maintenance reimbursements to rely on audited financial statements, and clarifying agricultural preserves procedures. The committee also considered House File 3883, which was amended with an A1 amendment before adoption. That bill updates appointments to the Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee, known as MOSAC, including direct appointments for certain county representatives and adding a tribal representative appointed by the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council, while also cleaning up outdated language and eligibility provisions. A former MOSAC member spoke in support of the committee’s work, and the chair said the bill was common-sense and renewed the motion to lay it over as amended. Finally, the committee began House File 3363, a bill described by the author as a response to safety concerns after the June events, aimed at removing public access to legislators’ home addresses from Campaign Finance Board materials; discussion had just begun when the transcript ended.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Jan 12th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the reason we did that is because we train them in-house.
  • this time, members will turn to Tab 4, and we'll take up Senate Bill 208 related to land use and development
  • regulations by Senator McLean. ...and we'll take up Senate Bill 208 related to land use and development
  • It will ensure that development application fees are transparent, cost-based, and tied to direct and
Bills: S0014, S0016, S0024, S0208, S0762
Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee heard several bills, beginning with SB 762, which was amended by a strike-all to remove a one-year sunset and delete a reporting requirement to the Legislature. The bill would allow offices of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel to take on certain capital cases from outside their region on an optional basis, with supporters saying it could save money and use existing in-house death penalty expertise. After testimony from Senator Martin and the Second Region’s regional counsel, the committee reported CS/SB 762 favorably. The committee also considered three local claims bills. SB 16, relating to relief for Heriberto A. Sanchez Mayan by the City of St. Petersburg, described severe injuries allegedly caused during an arrest and transport; the claimant’s counsel supported the bill, while President Gaetz spoke against the claims-bill process generally and voted no. The bill passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 14, for Jose Correa against Miami-Dade County, involved injuries from a bus-pedestrian collision and was supported by the claimant and county; it passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 24, for Lourdes and Edward Latour against Miami-Dade County, was an uncontested $500,000 settlement bill and passed unanimously. Finally, the committee took up SB 208 on land use and development regulations. A late-filed strike-all amendment, described as a negotiated compromise, would make development application fees transparent and cost-based, tie them to direct and reasonable indirect review costs, and set subjective compatibility standards for residential projects, with carve-outs for PUDs, master planned communities, and historic districts. Multiple local government, planning, environmental, and business groups appeared in support. The amendment was adopted, and the committee then reported CS/SB 208 favorably on a 10-0 vote.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • 15:23.199> through, that because developers come through, that because developers come through
  • process of developing a general plan? process of developing a general plan?
  • for some communities is that there isn't enough housing, affordable housing for instance.
  • > for housing um affordable housing for housing um affordable housing for instance.<00:54:21.520>
  • House<01:09:28.239> draft<01:09:28.719> one House draft one House draft one deletes<01:
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 10, 2026, with Chair Mark Hashem outlining strict testimony rules and noting a time constraint because of later hearings and floor session obligations. The committee then took up several bills, hearing mostly supportive testimony on HB 1881 relating to land use, HB 2218 relating to DLNR/community management, and HB 1956 relating to freshwater waves, while HB 1845 relating to the Land Use Commission drew legal concerns and opposition. HB 2151 relating to building materials had no substantive testimony presented in the excerpt, and the committee moved through it quickly. On HB 1881, testimony focused on protecting North Shore lands from overdevelopment. A supporter described the area as valuable precisely because it remains largely undeveloped, and a member asked whether the bill’s restrictions on “finculars” would affect existing or future private residential installations; the response suggested the bill was aimed at future commercial uses and that grandfathering or personal-use exceptions might be possible, but the exact wording would need legal refinement. HB 2218 received broad support from OHA, DLNR, Kua, Sierra Club, Hui Maka Aana, the Honlay Initiative, and others, who said the measure would expand community-based co-management across DLNR divisions, build on existing park partnerships, and produce real benefits such as better stewardship, safer access, local jobs, and stronger community trust. Members asked about the bill’s five-year review structure, how multiple community groups would be handled, and whether the model could apply to ocean or nearshore areas; DLNR said the board would retain authority, agreements would be non-exclusive and subject to review, and the department was still working through how the approach would function across different divisions and marine settings. For HB 1956, the Attorney General offered technical comments, urging clearer definitions of “residing” and “freshwater way,” clearer timing for citations and arrests, and more explicit procedural safeguards and agency roles. On HB 1845, the Attorney General and Land Use Commission raised concerns that the bill could conflict with constitutional protections for important agricultural lands and could not be reconciled with existing voting requirements; the LUC also said commissioners cannot vote by proxy under sunshine law and warned that the bill could allow too few commissioners to approve major boundary changes. Members questioned how the bill would work in counties without designated important agricultural lands, and the LUC explained that Kauai is the only county to have completed the IAL process, while the broader statutory process remains county-driven and has been the subject of litigation. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thanks for the opportunity to lay out House Bill 5380.
  • House Bill 2011 ...
  • If they wait two years, what happens is you could have economic development on that land; the developer
  • Concern is that we build more housing in Texas.
  • I'm here to testify against House Bill 871.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • We show you registered as Brian Toney for the Dallas Housing Coalition.
  • Housing affordability is now a statewide crisis and demands action.
  • ADUs play an important housing role and they should be allowed in cities.
  • At what point does that—this is not a housing emergency.
  • lot as long as what they're developing doesn't pose a danger or a nuisance.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/24/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • The House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee is called to order.
  • And our first bill is House File 1532. I see the author approaching the testifier's table.
  • I will move that House File 1532 Okay.
  • Next will be House File 2231. And would the author come to the testifier table?
  • > File next will be House File next will be House File 2231.<00:21:44.720> And<00:21:44.960
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is regarding the supportive housing development fund and directly involves the Housing Division
  • Division in the supportive housing development fund account.
  • For the record, I’m Mindy Elliott, representing the Nevada Housing Coalition, Reno Housing Authority,
  • of the Supportive Housing Development Fund also...”
  • “But of course, the founder of the Supportive Housing Development Fund also had such wise ideas, and
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:36 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our priority with the Housing Trust Fund has been development of single-family and multifamily homes.
  • Hernandez, we have a housing development in Clovis. Which is our focus.
  • Hernandez, we have a housing development in Clovis.
  • Hernandez, we have a housing development in Clovis. development in Clovis, and I don't know if you're
  • On single-family development housing, he said the $75 million they are asking to build new homes would
Bills: HB70, HB93, HB95, HB139, HB140, HJR4
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<02:49:49.160> rapid<02:49:49.520> re-housing, terms of our housing, rapid re-housing
  • , terms of our housing, rapid re-housing, um um um transitional<02:49:51.840> housing,<02:49:52.280
  • Thank you. the state and developers. So, with that the state and developers.
  • ideal site for housing. ideal site for housing.
  • Partners in Development Foundation. Partners in Development Foundation.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Opening Day Floor Session 01-21-2026 10:00am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Chang chairs housing, and we all know housing and the high cost is the largest impediment to
  • housing and we all know housing and the housing and we all know housing and the high<00:21:27.360
  • We have Senator DeCoite, the chair of Economic Development and Tourism.
  • To Senator McCelie, uh, he's a former consumer protection chair in the House.
  • consumer protection chair in the House. consumer protection chair in the House.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • to pay for the house to be torn down, and they also would have had to pay me more money for the house
  • Cities and towns have design and aesthetic requirements which help to ensure quality housing development
  • It's not a big heat bomb attached to your house. It's basically making your house a lot hotter.
  • housing developers here in Phoenix, and we toured the homes.
  • Ultimately, more affordable housing means that we have more supply and more diversity of housing.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 8 housing.
  • are larger developments and how that per-unit development cost goes down with the larger developments
  • Capturing PHAs and HFCs in addition to four and nine percent housing tax credit developments. ...and
  • and institutions, many of whom develop or invest in mixed-income and affordable housing communities.
  • It has essentially no vacant land for further development and additional tax value. ...the Housing Authority
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • ordinance would stop real estate development.
  • I found that the house sponsor of this bill is in the land development business.
  • Texans for Housing is a statewide housing... advocacy organization working to make housing more attainable
  • The problem SB 844. or addresses housing development being blocked, often by a single landowner, is happening
  • Developers won't even bother affordable housing developers like Habitat for Humanity and other others
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) Apr 7th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • ordinance would stop real estate development.
  • I found that the House sponsor of this bill is in the land development business in Mason County and has
  • Texans for Housing is a statewide housing advocacy organization working to make housing, uh, more attainable
  • The problem SB 844 addresses, housing development being blocked often by a single landowner, is happening
  • Affordable housing developers like Habitat for Humanity and other, others just don't even go in certain
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 7th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • As a result, developers are forced to construct developments with fewer units.
  • are larger developments and how that per-unit development cost goes down with the larger developments
  • Well, you'd still be capped at that per-developer cap for each one that you develop.
  • tax credit developments and PFCs currently listed in the bill. ...to 4% and 9% housing tax credit developments
  • and institutions, many of whom develop or invest in mixed-income and affordable housing communities.
Summary: The committee heard several bills dealing with local government authority, homeowners associations, hospital district policing, school AED inspections, special district annexation, public contracting penalties, and guaranteed income programs. Senate Bill 2073 by Sen. Zaffirini would clarify that appraisal districts may finance purchases, leases, or construction of real property for appraisal offices without prior approval from taxing units; it was supported by the Texas Association of Appraisal Districts and left pending. Senate Bill 1935 by Sen. Hinojosa would increase homeowner control of property owners association boards, require more transparency, limit fines and assessment increases, and require accessible meeting locations; HOA and builder representatives opposed it, arguing it would hinder maintenance and make dues harder to manage, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 434 by Sen. Miles would authorize Harris County Hospital District police officers, was supported by Harris Health, and was left pending. Senate Bill 1177 by Sen. Alvarado, as substituted, would require school AED inspections during fire inspections and reporting to school leadership; it was left pending. Senate Bill 1214 by Sen. Perry would update Concho County Hospital District law to align with current procurement and notice rules; it was left pending. Senate Bill 1965 by Sen. Middleton, for Sen. King, would tighten notice and proximity rules for special district annexations; district witnesses warned the bill could interfere with service to noncontiguous tracts, and the bill was left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 2046 by Sen. Bettencourt, which would increase criminal penalties for county purchasing act violations involving unauthorized separate or sequential purchases to evade competitive bidding, and create a tiered penalty structure based on contract amount. Former Harris County DA Kim Ogg, Deputy Attorney General Josh Reno, and James Quintero supported the bill, citing recent Harris County bid-rigging cases and arguing the current Class C misdemeanor penalty is too weak to deter misconduct; some members questioned whether the proposed thresholds were too low and whether stronger oversight, rather than higher penalties alone, would be more effective. The bill was left pending. Finally, Senate Bill 2010 by Sen. Bettencourt would bar counties and other political subdivisions from operating guaranteed income programs and address constitutional gift-clause concerns. Testimony split sharply: Ogg and Quintero argued such programs are unconstitutional, can be used for political data collection, and should not be funded with public money, while Paige Terry Barry defended the bill as protecting taxpayers and discouraging dependency. Senators also debated whether the state can restrict use of federal grant funds and whether local governments should be allowed to run such programs; the bill was left pending.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/12/2026 - House Rural Economic Development

Rural Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Madam Chair, members, House Bill 2926 allows municipalities to establish and maintain a workforce housing
  • Selina Bliss from Historic District 1, sponsoring House Bill 2926, known as the Workforce Housing Accelerator
  • Selina Bliss from Historic District 1, sponsoring House Bill 2926, known as the Workforce Housing Accelerator
  • missing middle, and that's workforce housing.
  • So it's going to help support and uphold affordable housing.
Summary: The committee began with a presentation on the modernization of the DeConcini Port of Entry in Nogales, Arizona. Testimony from the port authority chair, a county supervisor, and the Nogales mayor emphasized that the port is outdated, flood-prone, congested, and a safety concern because CBP facilities and traffic lanes sit on or near the international boundary and stormwater infrastructure. Speakers said the port is critical to local and state commerce, tourism, and tax revenue, and requested state support and letters backing federal funding efforts. Members discussed the sewer/stormwater flooding issue, the estimated $1.5 billion to $2 billion cost, and the need for federal action; the chair said a letter of support would be prepared for committee members to sign. The committee then heard and passed HB 2237, which appropriates $4.5 million for Apache Junction’s Superstition Trails and visitor gateway project, and HB 2926, the Workforce Housing Accelerator Act. HB 2926 would create expedited permitting for workforce housing, provide a single point of contact, reduce the state portion of prime contracting tax for qualifying projects, and lower the population threshold for certain industrial development authority bond actions. After an amendment, the bill passed 6-1. Testimony in support came from the sponsor and housing advocates, who said the bill would help address Arizona’s missing-middle housing shortage and reduce regulatory delays. The committee also passed HB 2113, which would require RUCO to intervene in utility rate cases when proposed residential rate increases are 100% or more. The sponsor argued RUCO should focus more on rural customers facing large percentage increases, while RUCO’s director said the office has only nine staff, a $1.9 million budget, and limited capacity, warning the bill could increase costs and delay cases. Members discussed rural ratepayer impacts, and the bill passed 5-1-1. HB 2824, authorizing local C-PACE programs for voluntary financing of commercial property improvements, also passed unanimously after testimony that it would support energy, water, and infrastructure upgrades without state general fund exposure. Finally, HB 2939, a rural investment tax credit bill tied to large qualifying investments and net new jobs, passed unanimously after Lucid Motors testified in support. The committee held HB 2950 due to time and adjourned, noting it would be heard first next week.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 26th, 2025

Local Government

Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee briefly convened and then immediately moved to recess. Senator Paxton made a motion to recess subject to the call of the chair, which was accepted. No bills, testimony, or substantive policy issues were discussed during the meeting. With no other business before the committee, it stood in recess subject to the call of the chair.