Video & Transcript Research : 'conservation incentive'

Page 5 of 395
HI
Bills: SB2278, SB2908, SB2987
Summary: The House Committees on Tourism and Economic Development and Technology heard several measures on February 12, 2026. HB 1950 would dedicate 15% of transit accommodations tax revenue to a new state-led marketing and branding special fund and require an annual tourism management plan. HTA and DBEDT supported the bill as providing predictable funding for marketing and tourism management, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the special fund structure as limiting legislative flexibility. Members discussed the size of the allocation and whether a tourism emergency fund would still be needed; the bill later advanced with amendments that removed some provisions and blanked out the 15% figure for further discussion, and it passed with amendments. HB 2268 would add film production marketing and promotion to HTA’s powers. The governor’s office, HTA, the Hawaii Film Alliance, and several industry groups supported the measure, arguing that film and TV exposure drives tourism and generates significant spending and tax revenue, while one individual testified in opposition. In questions, HTA said it would use existing staff and did not have a separate cost estimate. The committee amended the bill to specify that film productions are primarily filmed in Hawaii and deferred the date to continue discussion; it then passed with amendments. The committee also heard HB 2156, which would raise filing thresholds for general excise tax and transit accommodations tax filers. The Department of Taxation said the change could increase administrative burden if more filers shift from mandatory electronic filing to paper filing, while the Tax Foundation noted the filing threshold issue is separate from e-filing requirements. The bill was moved forward with a deferred date. HB 1946, concerning time-share registration renewals and amendments, drew support from ARDA and other industry testimony, with no opposition noted; DCCA was said to be in talks with the industry. It was also advanced with technical amendments and a deferred date.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Apr 9th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The current, um, incentive that is there with Texas Workforce Commission.
  • And so having an incentive like this where the, um, the perks are put on the center versus the parent
  • In sum, Chairman Meyer's bill will provide a clear incentive for companies to 1, move their incorporation
Bills: HB74, HB175
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The base incentive rate is between 5 to 20%.
  • California doesn't have the incentives to compete.
  • Are there any local incentives that you plug into?
  • Incentives changed the whole industry.
  • to institute a 35% incentive.
Bills: SB22, SB 22
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Conservation District.
  • Concern by the stakeholders and Gonzalez Underground Water Conservation District.
  • I'm the Vice President of Conservation at the San Antonio Water System.
  • Water conservation is required to be done every five years in a very public way.
  • We represent 91 of the 98 groundwater conservation districts.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Energy Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • water use disguises the actual water use and hides the serious offenders at times of required conservation
  • Given the misalignment of incentives that favor large system investments over distribution And non-wires
  • The public utilities being able to serve as aggregators without adequate guardrails, as the Conservative
  • For over 120 years, the National Audubon Society's work has focused on habitat conservation, so some
  • Those are from Audubon Conservation Ranching certified farms that do similar work in implementing conservation
Bills: HF2928, HF2912, HF2297
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is important because we need more tools in Texas to be able to conserve groundwater.
  • The Nature Conservancy in Texas has worked here for over 60 years to preserve the land.
  • But as a conservation tool, especially as our needs are... Are greater and greater every day.
  • It does remind me of conservation efforts in the past.
  • Of course, we want to conserve. It is our business to work in water.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • At-risk pay being bonuses, incentives and the like.
  • At risk pay being<01:31:09.679> bonuses,<01:31:10.320> incentives<01:31:11.120> and<
  • being bonuses, incentives and the like. being bonuses, incentives and the like.
  • So examples of this would be around wind production tax incentives, which alone has saved Xcel Energy
  • So examples of this would be around wind production tax incentives, which alone has saved Xcel Energy
Bills: HF4059, HF76
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Economic Development Apr 7th, 2025

Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • “Without the incentive, a power project still makes sense. Dr.
  • However, when it comes to taxpayer programs, incentives, okay?
  • That bill also acknowledged the increasing... ...programs, incentives.
  • We talked about financial incentives for generators to build in a particular place.
  • in place that says, but for this tax incentive you wouldn't build or because of this tax incentive you
Summary: The committee heard a series of bills, mostly related to economic development, tax incentives, and workforce programs. Senate Bill 1534 would direct a study by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Texas Workforce Commission on health physics education and workforce needs; resource witnesses from the Workforce Commission and Coordinating Board testified, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1553 would authorize Kerr County to impose a hotel occupancy tax for tourism-related uses, and Senate Bills 1086 and 1087 would authorize similar county hotel taxes for Children’s County and Mason County; all three bills received supportive testimony and were left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1754, which would prohibit county and local tax abatements for renewable energy facilities selling power wholesale, with testimony sharply divided between landowners and policy groups opposing renewable subsidies and industry representatives and some senators arguing the bill would harm clean energy investment and local decision-making; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2322, which would exempt dispatchable electric generation facilities from the JEDI program’s compelling-factor test so they could qualify for school district tax incentives; testimony was mixed, and the bill was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Bill 1718, which would add the NRA annual meeting to the state’s major events reimbursement program. The bill’s sponsor and NRA representatives argued the event brings substantial tourism and economic activity, while opponents said it would use taxpayer funds to subsidize an organization that opposes gun safety measures; the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 2004 would add the Arlington Grand Prix to the major events reimbursement program, with the committee substitute exempting it from the usual competitive site-selection requirement because of timing; testimony from the event organizers and Arlington tourism officials was supportive, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 2448 would create a rural workforce development grant program at the Texas Workforce Commission to support college-and-career readiness and technical assistance in rural communities; witnesses from Texas 2036, Collegiate Edgination, and a rural school district supported it, and it was left pending. Finally, Senate Bill 913 would repeal a special requirement that Alpine dedicate at least 50% of its hotel occupancy tax to advertising and promotion, and Senate Bill 1143 would require more coordination and reporting for youth workforce programs serving disconnected young Texans; both bills received supportive testimony and were left pending. At the end of the hearing, Senator Johnson moved that the committee stand in recess, subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The incentives that...
  • As such, they should not be when it comes to school abatement tax incentives.
  • Taxpayer programs and incentives. Okay.
  • We talked about financial incentives for generators. ...incentive you wouldn't build, or because of this
  • tax incentive you would.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas taxpayers do not need to provide more incentive for non-dependable energy. Thank you.
  • However, when it comes to taxpayer programs, incentives, okay?
  • We just had a whole long discussion about incentives when it comes to community impact.
  • We talked about financial incentives for generators to build in a particular place.
  • tax incentive you would.
Summary: The Senate Economic Development Committee met to hear a series of bills and informational primers, with several resource witnesses from the Governor’s Office, the Texas Workforce Commission, and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The chair opened by noting the death of Senator King’s son and asking members to keep the family in their prayers. Most bills were laid out and left pending subject to the call of the chair after brief author presentations and public testimony. The committee heard several local hotel occupancy tax bills: SB 1553 for Kerr County, SB 1086 for Childress County, SB 1087 for Mason County, and SB 913 for Alpine. Supporters, including the Texas Hotel and Lodging Association and local officials, said the measures would allow counties or the city to use hotel tax revenue for tourism-related projects and local development. The committee also heard SB 1534, which would direct a study on health physics education and workforce needs in Texas; resource witnesses from TWC and THECB testified on the bill. All of these measures were left pending. A major portion of the hearing focused on SB 1754, which would prohibit local tax abatements for renewable energy facilities selling power at wholesale, with an exception for certain battery storage tied to dispatchable generation. The bill drew strong support from witnesses who argued counties should not subsidize wind and solar projects that can harm neighboring landowners and that renewables already receive substantial federal support. Opponents from the solar and storage industry argued the bill would remove a voluntary local economic development tool, raise power prices, and discourage investment. Senators also debated landowner impacts, grid reliability, and whether the bill was the right policy tool; the bill was left pending. The committee also heard SB 2322, a committee substitute related to the Jobs, Energy, Technology, and Innovation Act, which would exempt electric generation facilities from the program’s compelling-factor test so they can qualify for school tax limitation agreements. Supporters said the change would correct an unintended barrier for dispatchable generation, while Senator Johnson argued it would weaken the program’s purpose by subsidizing projects that would locate in Texas anyway. SB 1718 would add the NRA annual meeting to the major events reimbursement program; the NRA supported it, while gun violence prevention advocates opposed using state incentives for the organization. SB 2004 would add the Arlington Grand Prix to the major events program, and SB 2448 would create a rural workforce development grant program; both drew supportive testimony and were left pending. The committee also heard SB 1143, a substitute bill aimed at improving transparency and coordination in programs serving opportunity youth ages 14 to 24, with witnesses supporting better reporting and workforce alignment. At the end of the meeting, Senator Johnson moved that the committee stand in recess subject to the call of the chair.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I will say that I'm conservation.
  • significant investments in conservation significant investments in conservation efforts,<00:58:31.119
  • guard rails as uh the Conservative guard rails as uh the Conservative Energy<01:26:05.600> Forum
  • conservation strategies to the benefit of both grassland birds and farms.
  • :21.719> Farms Conservation Ranching Certified Farms Conservation Ranching Certified Farms that
Bills: HF2928, HF2912, HF2297
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • in northern Minnesota, in qualifying for agricultural land exemptions under Minnesota's Wetland Conservation
  • Minnesota's wetland conservation act. Minnesota's wetland conservation act.
  • Sheila Vany, assistant director with the Minnesota Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts
  • we do recognize SWCDs across the state are having some challenges with implementing the Wetland Conservation
  • Cover crops have become an increasingly important conservation practice for Minnesota farmers, particularly
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA-AEN Public Hearing 02-11-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • Conservation Sanctuary as a nonprofit group to work with DNR on similar things.
  • >> So, so where are you guys looking at establishing these conservation sanctuaries, and how much will
  • <00:27:15.919> for valuable but there's no incentive for valuable but there's no incentive
  • which is the other conservation which is the other sanctuary<01:46:01.440> bill.
  • Moving on to SB 1178, relating to carbon sequestration incentives.
Summary: The committees heard testimony on several measures related to wildlife, conservation, shoreline adaptation, and climate governance. On SB 2606, which would establish the Freshwater State Recreational Area Wildlife Sanctuary Corporation, the Department of Land and Natural Resources said it had concerns about employee eligibility and was not yet prepared to comment further on the bill’s ramifications. After testimony ended, a senator asked DLNR to follow up with more detail, and the department said it would relay the questions to leadership and respond later. No vote was taken on the measure during the excerpt. On SB 3253, which would create the Hawaii Conservation Sanctuary as a nonprofit entity to work with DLNR, the department said it supported the bill. In discussion, DLNR said Hawaii has not done anything like this before, described a similar model in New Zealand, and estimated that developing such a sanctuary could cost millions of dollars. Members also discussed whether the concept would fit with existing efforts such as Hakalau, and DLNR said the bill could apply to private or state lands depending on the site. No action was taken. The most extensive discussion was on SB 237, which would expand state and county authority to develop adaptation pathways for relocating infrastructure away from sea level rise and coastal flooding areas. DLNR supported the bill, saying it prioritizes public trust resources over economic development or private property. The Kahana Bay Steering Committee and the Shoreline Preservation Coalition opposed the measure, arguing it was too focused on managed retreat and should include a broader range of shoreline responses, such as erosion mitigation, groins, sand nourishment, and other interim protections. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development said it appreciated the bill’s intent but wanted broader language that would allow more tools in the toolbox. Members debated whether retreat is inevitable, whether different shorelines require different approaches, and whether the bill should be more flexible. No vote was taken. The final measure discussed was SB 3252, which would amend the powers and duties of the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, create a coordinator position, and appropriate funds. The commission’s coordinator testified in support, while OPSD opposed the bill, saying it would remove the two cabinet-level co-chair positions, raise accountability concerns, and duplicate some of OPSD’s functions. In questioning, members debated whether the current commission structure has been effective, who would appoint or confirm the coordinator, and whether the bill would improve transparency and implementation. OPSD said it supported more statewide interdepartmental funding for climate planning and staffing, but had concerns about the proposed governance changes. No vote or final action was taken in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 28th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, Plum Creek Conservation District manages 28 flood control structures built on the tributaries
  • Conservation District in support of Senate Bill 2568.
  • substitute for Senate Bill 1959 seeks to amend the Enabling Act for the North Texas Groundwater Conservation
  • Texas Special District. ...and to ensure that the district's permitting process aligns with the conservation
  • I serve... ...as the general manager for North Texas Groundwater Conservation District.