Video & Transcript Research : 'clock change'

Page 5 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're changing seats for today's meeting.
  • It's solely to deal with... ...the interpretation has changed.
  • As far as the interpretation, when did your interpretation change?
  • But the interpretation within the department hasn't changed.
  • So if somebody was to change the pipes, are this big, if somebody was to have to go change that, that's
Summary: The committee heard several water and energy-related measures. SB 1200, as amended, addressed Arizona Department of Water Resources treatment of certain “conduit lakes” in active management areas, allowing some existing lake systems to continue using groundwater mixed with effluent for irrigation or landscaping purposes. ADWR testified in opposition to the amendment’s policy implications and enforcement concerns, while HOA, homebuilder, and resident witnesses argued the bill would grandfather existing communities, avoid costly system redesigns, and reflect prior agency practice. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then passed SB 1200 on a 6-3 vote. SB 1419, dealing with residential rooftop solar installations, was amended to add consumer-protection and disclosure requirements, including roof inspection and installation standards, clearer contract disclosures, and contractor responsibilities. County and industry witnesses said the bill was the product of a lengthy stakeholder process aimed at addressing misleading sales practices and installation problems, though some technical issues were still to be resolved on the floor. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1419 on a 6-1 vote with two members present and one absent. SB 1447, which extends Pinal AMA groundwater withdrawal fee provisions and related fund deadlines, was supported by irrigation and agricultural interests as a way to finance local infrastructure and conservation during Colorado River uncertainty; it passed 7-1 with one present and one absent. SB 1560 raised the maximum single loan amount from the Water Supply Development Revolving Fund from $3 million to $20 million. WIFA said the current cap was too low for larger rural water projects and that the change would better match demand without harming the fund’s revolving nature; the bill passed 8-1 with one absent. The committee also approved SCM 1004, urging Congress to clearly define EPA powers and duties, despite some members saying it was unnecessary or backward-looking; it passed 6-2 with one absent. The meeting then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 2/23/26

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • What changes is their ability to pay.
  • What changes is their ability to pay.
  • What changes is their ability to pay.
  • Kelly will be number two. decreased due to change in type, decreased due to change in type, intensity
  • Without this change, health centers lack the flexibility to continue to support the innovative changes
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB1164 changes this immediacy requirement with respect to the initial apprehension under certain circumstances
  • The substitute before you changes the makeup of the commission to be a total of 13 members, six appointed
  • I just appreciate you all helping to change how things are being done. There are people at risk.
  • Well, we've got a clock that we're up against. Yes, I've got it.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Y'all, this has to change.
  • Yes, it changes the default. Do I understand that? Yes.
  • I'm just trying to figure out why we're changing the default, to be honest. To make it simpler.
  • SB401 would change that perspective for students across the state.
  • Okay, but there will be a committee substitute, but the committee substitute changes...
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We will still be recaptured for sure, but also understand that we're about ready to change the M&O rate
  • So these numbers are going to change.
  • up the committee substitute for Senate Bill 2623 and recognizes Senator Creighton to explain the changes
  • The substitute makes several changes based on the witnesses that we had in the committee hearing and
  • Some of the changes came out of the committee hearing last week.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2025-03-27

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's really low-cost, no-cost, and technical change items.
  • What changes is the MPCA seeking regarding those permits?
  • So nothing is changing in the requirements, just recognizing that tribal sovereignty.
  • To be clear, the MPCA's policies on when to require modeling are not changing here.
  • Okay, the motion then is changed.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um certainly changes at the question.
  • The change in environmental effects.
  • ><01:35:13.520> just changing to the requirements just changing to the requirements just recognizing
  • The motion then is changed.
  • Instead of being referred to changed.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • cause of all this is is climate change cause of all this is is climate change uh<00:02:53.480>
  • This bill does not change coverage levels.
  • <00:18:45.520> the network dentist it just changes the network dentist it just changes the
  • <00:37:51.359> on to explain that bylaws can be changed on to explain that bylaws can be changed
  • we really can't change anything um we<01:18:07.199> shouldn't<01:18:07.480> change<01:
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • Hundred thousand dollars in a hearing without any kind of warning and with no change of circumstances
  • Nevada hasn't, and that's what AB 375 aims to change. Ensuring Nevada doesn't get left behind.
  • So they will be actually changing the bar, as you noted.
  • We are hopeful that these changes address the concerns expressed by our stakeholders.
  • I know that there were some other changes in here. So there is no fiscal note at this point.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Wed Mar 18, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • the insurer for losses relating from climate disasters and extreme weather attributable to climate change
  • responsible party for damages resulting from climate disasters, extreme weather attributable to climate change
  • , and other long-term changes in the climate system.
  • This is climate change in real time, and the costs are being directly passed on to Hawaii residents.
  • But that property was damaged because of allegedly fossil fuels, climate change, and so forth.
Summary: The committee heard SB 1166 SD2, a bill on insurance and climate-related damages that would authorize the Hawaii Property Insurance Association and, in amended versions discussed during testimony, other public and private entities to pursue civil actions to recover losses tied to climate disasters and extreme weather. DCCA’s Insurance Division and the Department of the Attorney General raised legal concerns, saying the bill’s scope may not fit the insurance code section being amended, that it could create subject-matter and title issues, and that some subrogation language may be duplicative of existing rate-filing practice. Lawyers for Justice opposed the measure, arguing it conflicts with existing subrogation law and recent Hawaii Supreme Court rulings that treat the judicial lien process as the exclusive remedy. The American Petroleum Institute also opposed, warning the bill would add liability and litigation risk for companies operating under existing permits and could undermine energy reliability and investment. Supporters said the bill would help shift climate-related insurance costs away from residents and onto fossil fuel companies and other responsible parties. Testimony in support came from the Polluters Pay Hawaii Coalition, Center for Climate Integrity, Hawaii Island Council, Our Hawaii, Sierra Club of Hawaii, and others, who described recent flooding, storm damage, rising premiums, non-renewals, and underinsurance as evidence of a worsening climate-driven insurance crisis. Several supporters urged amendments to give the Attorney General explicit authority to recover insurance-related losses for the Hurricane Relief Fund, HPIA, and private insurers, and to ensure recovered amounts benefit policyholders. Committee members questioned whether HPIA is a private entity, whether the Attorney General could represent it, whether the bill could create double recovery or affect pending climate litigation, and whether insurers would have standing or damages if they are only paying contractual claims. The committee then took up SB 888 SD2, a consumer protection bill that would restrict smart household security device operators from sharing user data with law enforcement without consent or a judicial order, and would bar conditioning device use on such consent. The Office of Consumer Protection testified in support and said an Illinois law could serve as a useful template for exceptions to the warrant requirement. An individual supporter said the measure would protect immigrant communities, judges, and others from surveillance and misuse of private data. No vote was taken during the portion of the meeting provided, and the chair noted additional written testimony submitted in support of SB 1166.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, committee members, Kevin Chang, executive director of Kawai, we stand on our testimony.
  • I really thank Olan Fiser and Kua Kevin Chang for really using their networks to reach out to hundreds
  • So just changing it to important done.
  • There's concern there about the change in the valuation, which is what due process is all about.
  • I wanted to make changes, but I don't think I have enough time now.
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 10, 2026, with Chair Mark Hashem outlining strict testimony rules and noting a time constraint because of later hearings and floor session obligations. The committee then took up several bills, hearing mostly supportive testimony on HB 1881 relating to land use, HB 2218 relating to DLNR/community management, and HB 1956 relating to freshwater waves, while HB 1845 relating to the Land Use Commission drew legal concerns and opposition. HB 2151 relating to building materials had no substantive testimony presented in the excerpt, and the committee moved through it quickly. On HB 1881, testimony focused on protecting North Shore lands from overdevelopment. A supporter described the area as valuable precisely because it remains largely undeveloped, and a member asked whether the bill’s restrictions on “finculars” would affect existing or future private residential installations; the response suggested the bill was aimed at future commercial uses and that grandfathering or personal-use exceptions might be possible, but the exact wording would need legal refinement. HB 2218 received broad support from OHA, DLNR, Kua, Sierra Club, Hui Maka Aana, the Honlay Initiative, and others, who said the measure would expand community-based co-management across DLNR divisions, build on existing park partnerships, and produce real benefits such as better stewardship, safer access, local jobs, and stronger community trust. Members asked about the bill’s five-year review structure, how multiple community groups would be handled, and whether the model could apply to ocean or nearshore areas; DLNR said the board would retain authority, agreements would be non-exclusive and subject to review, and the department was still working through how the approach would function across different divisions and marine settings. For HB 1956, the Attorney General offered technical comments, urging clearer definitions of “residing” and “freshwater way,” clearer timing for citations and arrests, and more explicit procedural safeguards and agency roles. On HB 1845, the Attorney General and Land Use Commission raised concerns that the bill could conflict with constitutional protections for important agricultural lands and could not be reconciled with existing voting requirements; the LUC also said commissioners cannot vote by proxy under sunshine law and warned that the bill could allow too few commissioners to approve major boundary changes. Members questioned how the bill would work in counties without designated important agricultural lands, and the LUC explained that Kauai is the only county to have completed the IAL process, while the broader statutory process remains county-driven and has been the subject of litigation. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • The substitute makes four changes.
  • There have been a number of changes that have been made.
  • Can I change my position to again the committee substitute?
  • If it's not changed, it is soon to be raised to $11,700.
  • Well, things are changing. Let's do it. Okay.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that wouldn't change.
  • Another question, if this bill is passed does it change...
  • Which were not changing in this bill? Yes, they're not changing.
  • You are changing lives today. Everyone who's testified are changing lives and making Texas better.
  • Okay, and the change did occur.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

House Chamber - Thu Feb 12, 2026, 12:00PM HST - Day 14

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Uh, I will change my vote to support. >> Okay.
  • But the only difference that this bill makes is it changes it from an opt-in to an opt-out.
  • But the only difference that this bill makes is it changes it from an opt-in to an opt-out.
  • I would like to change my vote from a no to a reservation.
  • Um I would like to change my corrected.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I will vote how I'm going to vote now, but if it's not changed up by floor, I will change my vote.
  • So for now, I'll vote aye, but if it's not changed, I will change my vote on the floor. Thank you.
  • We’ve made some major changes this year to improve it.
  • We can change and amend those rules any time.
  • We can change and amend those rules any time.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard and advanced several bills. HB 2763 would require legislative approval before the Arizona Game and Fish Commission could close a state-run shooting range. Supporters, including the sponsor, a Prescott doctor, gun-rights advocates, and Game and Fish, argued that range closures can push shooting into unsafe desert areas and that the legislature should have a voice; the bill passed 8-1. HB 2417 would let courts, at a defendant’s request, use speed-inhibiting devices instead of license suspension for certain speeding and racing offenses. The sponsor and supporters said it would help people keep working and reduce recidivism, while an Arizona Trucking Association representative warned the bill was overbroad and conflicted with federal law; the committee adopted an amendment and passed the bill 7-2. HB 2345 created a felony for unlawfully present persons possessing falsified CDLs and imposed vehicle forfeiture and employer penalties; trucking industry testimony said it was preempted by federal law and unenforceable, but the sponsor said he would keep working on it, and the bill passed 5-3 with one present after amendment. The committee also considered HB 2666, which increases penalties for sexual extortion involving victims ages 15-17. The sponsor and supporters from the anti-trafficking community and county attorney’s office said the bill responds to a serious and growing online exploitation problem affecting teens. Defense and juvenile-justice concerns focused on whether the bill could sweep in minors, create mandatory consecutive sentences, and fail to account for age-related defenses; the sponsor and supporters said they were open to discussing amendments, but the bill passed 8-0 with one present. HB 2175 would add political expression and political affiliation to Arizona’s bias-crime sentencing enhancements and create new misdemeanor-level enhancements for certain bias-motivated offenses. The sponsor, ADL, and county attorney’s office said it fills gaps and targets conduct, not speech; the ACLU and defense testimony warned it could chill speech and give prosecutors too much discretion. The bill passed 6-2 after amendment. HB 2186 would allow a passenger in a traffic stop to satisfy identity requirements by verbally providing name and date of birth rather than producing physical ID. The sponsor said it was meant to fix an unconstitutional-vagueness problem and clarify the law after a prior court issue; there was little opposition, and it passed 7-0 with one present. The committee also began hearing HB 2364, which would add penalties for distributing or receiving abortion-inducing drugs by courier, delivery, or rail service; the sponsor said it would strengthen enforcement of existing Arizona restrictions, but the transcript cuts off before testimony, debate, or any vote on that bill.