Bills: HB1160, HB1289, HB1339, HB1798, HB1002, HB1065, HB1155, HB1916, HB2264, HB1078, HB1687, HB1701, HB1717, HB1795, HB1859, HB2088, HB2091, HB2107, HB2109, HB2110, HB2113, HB2124, HB2125, HB2133, HB2134, HB2140, HB2151, HB2152, HB2155, HB2165, HB2185, HB2191, HB2205, HB2211, HB2219, HB2228, HB2229, HB2230, HB2235, HB2238, HB2242, HB2245, HB2249, HB2253, HB2254, HB2269, HB2272, HB2283, HB2304, HB2317, HB2340, HB2343, HB2385, HB2406, HB2417, HB2426, HB2445, HB2452, HB2472, HB2492, HB2501, HB2531, HB2574, HB2606, HB2664

Keywords: design review, local government, land use, zoning, project permits, housing density, middle housing, affordable housing, parking minimums, single-family zoning, infill development, growth management, comprehensive plan, permit streamlining, objective development regulations, architectural review, administrative review, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, ADU

Bills: HB1812, HB2232, HB2250, HB2340, HB2577

Keywords: anesthesia services, healthcare access, reimbursement, patient care, equitable treatment, emergency services, healthcare outcomes, health infrastructure, system improvement, charity care, residency requirements, medical assistance, low-income, HB 2340, nursing assistants, nurse aide, substance use disorder monitoring program, monitoring program, credentialing, licensure

Summary: The House Health Care & Wellness Committee held public hearings on several bills. House Bill 2232 would create a time-sensitive emergency data repository for cardiac, stroke, and trauma care, with Department of Health oversight, quality improvement reporting, and support for rural facilities; emergency physicians, nurses, and DOH supported it as a way to improve outcomes and reduce rural-urban disparities, while the Washington State Hospital Association said hospitals support the goal but lack resources to absorb the added reporting burden. House Bill 1812, on the proposed substitute, would bar insurers, public employee plans, HCA, and Medicaid managed care from imposing anesthesia time limits or related reimbursement caps; the sponsor and anesthesia providers said it protects patient safety and prevents insurers from interfering with medical judgment, and the Washington State Society of Anesthesiologists asked for a clarifying amendment on physical status modifiers. House Bill 2340 would extend substance use disorder monitoring program protections and stipend eligibility to nursing assistants; the sponsor and Board of Nursing supported it as a way to reduce stigma and help participants afford treatment and monitoring, and the board said the stipend is currently funded through general funds. House Bill 2577 would require acute care hospital inspections at least every 18 months, clarify use of approved accrediting organizations, and adjust fire protection re-inspection rules; the sponsor and Department of Health said it responds to a JLARC audit and clarifies timelines after COVID-related delays, while the department said it is still working to catch up on inspections and continues complaint investigations. House Bill 2250 would limit hospital charity care eligibility to Washington residents, using residency standards similar to Medicaid and preserving emergency care coverage under EMTALA. Supporters, including border hospital officials, the Washington State Hospital Association, and Seattle Children’s, argued the current policy draws nonresident non-emergent patients and strains rural and border hospitals, especially Newport Hospital, while opponents from Columbia Legal Services, Dollar For, Northwest Health Law Advocates, and QLaw Foundation said the bill would chill access for immigrants, temporary visa holders, and people seeking reproductive or gender-affirming care, and that the real problem is hospitals failing to provide charity care to eligible patients. The sponsor said he is working with DOH on amendments to address unintended consequences, and several testifiers indicated willingness to continue stakeholder discussions. No votes were taken; the committee heard testimony and then closed public hearings on the bills before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• current law, the school district may also submit claims for reimbursement by the legislature under RCW

Bills: SB6052, SB6051, SB5907, SB5860, SB5574

Keywords: digital transcript, transcript sharing, student records, education data exchange, K-12, higher education, community colleges, universities, school districts, charter schools, state-tribal education compact schools, educational service districts, data interoperability, secure platform, student consent, FERPA, privacy, education technology, records management, transcript standard

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several education bills. Senate Bill 6051 would let local school boards grant waivers or partial waivers of certain state laws and rules to individual schools, with limits on waiving health and safety, civil rights, basic education, records, and constitutional requirements. Supporters said it could give districts flexibility and reveal recurring burdens or unfunded mandates; opponents including WEA, OSPI, and the State Board of Education warned it was too broad, could weaken protections such as special education, and would create inconsistent oversight. The committee also discussed whether waivers would be granted by school boards or reviewed by OSPI, and staff clarified the bill gives waiver authority to local school boards, with reporting to OSPI and the State Board afterward. Senate Bill 6052 would create a statewide digital transcript data-sharing environment for K-12 and higher education, with a secure standard for exchanging transcript data and student-controlled, revocable permission for disclosure. Testifiers from universities, OSPI, school districts, and school counselors supported the bill, saying it would reduce paper handling, staff time, errors, and delays in admissions, while helping students and families navigate transcript requests more easily. Questions focused on alignment with the High School and Beyond plan, security, and whether the system would also support apprenticeships, CTE, and other postsecondary pathways. Senate Bill 5907 would expand access to ECEAP for military families with incomes below a set threshold and add prioritization for deployed or single-custodial military parents. The sponsor and supporters from ESDs, school districts, early learning groups, and veterans organizations said military families face frequent moves, deployments, child care instability, and related stress, and that the bill would provide a modest, cost-effective benefit without a state fiscal impact. After the hearings, the committee took executive action: it adopted a substitute and passed SB 5860 to Ways and Means, and adopted a substitute and passed SB 5574 to Rules.

Transcript Highlights:

• 4, line 37, last line: financial aid calculator, creating... ...financial aid calculator created in RCW
• read: An act relating to protecting the integrity of last line constitute a new chapter in Title 69 RCW
• On page three, after line 29 of the strike amendment, manager as defined in RCW 48.200.020.
• Clerk will read: On page 3, line 12 of the strike, taxpayers has the same meaning as RCW 48.14.0201.
• Care services contractor regulated under Chapter 48.44 RCW.

Bills: HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB6044, SB6132, SB5109, SB5877, SB6258, HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB5420, SB5868, SB6044, SB6132, SJM8002

Keywords: behavioral health, emergency services, health insurance, provider access, mental health funding, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, insurance tax, state regulation, insurers, taxation, budget impact, juice grapes, agriculture, commerce, market access, fire safety, insurance incentives

Transcript Highlights:

• Insert subsection 13: Payments on RCW 74.60.130 are exempt from this section.

Bills: HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB6044, SB6132, SB5109, SB5877, SB6258, HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB5420, SB5868, SB6044, SB6132, SJM8002

Keywords: behavioral health, emergency services, health insurance, provider access, mental health funding, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, insurance tax, state regulation, insurers, taxation, budget impact, juice grapes, agriculture, commerce, market access, fire safety, insurance incentives

Bills: HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB6044, SB6132, SB5109, SB5877, SB6258, HB2720, HB2073, HB2487, SB5816, SB5919, SB5831, SB6137, SB6244, SB5420, SB5868, SB6044, SB6132, SJM8002

Keywords: behavioral health, emergency services, health insurance, provider access, mental health funding, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, insurance tax, state regulation, insurers, taxation, budget impact, juice grapes, agriculture, commerce, market access, fire safety, insurance incentives

Transcript Highlights:

• It is also specified that the legislature intends for this RCW chapter to be implemented subject to several
• However, those principles are not meaningfully recognized in Washington family courts and how RCW 26
• However, those principles are not meaningfully recognized in Washington family courts and how RCW 26
• However, those principles are not meaningfully recognized in Washington family courts and how RCW 26
• RCW 26.51, the abuse of litigation statute, is being manipulated to deny people access to their courts

Bills: HB2735, SB5868, SJM8006

Keywords: family law, constitutional floor, legal standards, child custody, divorce, SB 5868, superior court, judge, judgeship, judicial vacancy, court administration, Skagit County, Yakima County, RCW 2.08.061, Washington courts, county judges, caseload, docket backlog, judicial workload, elected judge

Transcript Highlights:

• The more I read and analyze this bill and the RCWs that are attached to it, the more it seems like this
• The more I read and analyze this bill and the RCWs that are attached to it, the more it seems like this
• This seems to be a workaround if the county auditor cannot find false information under RCW 9A.72.040

Bills: HB2309, HB2249, HB2417, SGA9066, SGA9246, SGA9268

Keywords: state employment, classified service, civil service, job qualifications, degree requirements, postgraduate degree, master's degree, doctorate, higher education, Office of Financial Management, OFM, classification plan, salary survey, market rate pay, compensation, workforce diversity, hiring reform, employment eligibility, work authorization, DACA

Bills: HB2007, HB2360, HB2369, HB2432, HB2440, HB2534, HB2557

Keywords: competency-based assessment, graduation requirements, education reform, student opportunity, pathway options, albuterol, asthma, inhaler, rescue inhaler, respiratory emergency, school nurse, student medication, self-administration, anaphylaxis, public schools, private schools, charter schools, tribal compact schools, K-12 health, medication policy

Summary: The House Education Committee met in executive session to consider seven bills. Staff briefed measures on competency-based graduation assessments (HB 2007), school-supplied albuterol and standing orders for respiratory emergencies (HB 2360), a Washington Local Food for Schools Program (HB 2369), surplus technology hardware for students (HB 2432), confidentiality for Education Ombuds complaint records (HB 2440), military family school enrollment and records provisions (HB 2534), and special education evaluation timelines and parent access to evaluation reports (HB 2557). Several proposed amendments were discussed, including multiple null-and-void budget clauses, a substitute and technical changes for HB 2534, and timeline clarifications for HB 2557; one Chase amendment was withdrawn after staff said it was already covered, and several Couture null-and-void amendments were rejected or withdrawn. In final action, the committee reported HB 2007, HB 2360, HB 2369, HB 2432, HB 2440, HB 2534, and HB 2557 out of committee with due pass recommendations. HB 2007 passed 19-0 after a null-and-void amendment failed. HB 2360 passed as a substitute after adoption of the Donaghy amendment and withdrawal of another amendment, with a 17-2 vote. HB 2369 passed 19-0 after a null-and-void amendment failed. HB 2432 passed 16-3. HB 2440 passed 12-7, with members split over privacy versus transparency concerns. HB 2534 passed unanimously as a substitute. HB 2557 passed unanimously after adoption of amendments setting special education evaluation and report timelines and rejecting a null-and-void amendment. Before adjourning, the chair announced a 6:00 p.m. deadline for approving amendments for posting and thanked Senator Harris for bringing homemade treats for members. The committee then adjourned.

Bills: HB2095, HB2500, HB2412, HB2595, HB2354, HB2597

Keywords: public safety, vulnerable users, pedestrians, protected classes, transportation, charitable organization, charity, nonprobate transfer, beneficiary designation, life insurance, retirement account, payable on death, POD account, transfer on death, TOD, financial institution, insurance company, transfer agent, estate planning, donor intent

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several bills. House Bill 2354 on common interest communities was presented as a trailer bill to the Waukeva, with a proposed substitute that would exempt small middle-housing communities from most Waukeva provisions, exempt certain middle-housing communities from reserve study requirements, raise the audit threshold from $50,000 to $100,000 in annual assessments, and prevent governing documents from shifting responsibility for electric vehicle charging stations and heat pumps away from the unit owner. The sponsor and a community associations representative supported the bill as a targeted cleanup measure for small communities, and there was no opposition testimony. House Bill 2412, which would add a ninth Superior Court judge in Yakima County, drew strong support from the sponsor, county commissioners, the presiding judge, and court staff. Testimony emphasized Yakima County’s population growth, a backlog of more than 2,800 cases older than two years, increased protection order filings, and trial delays affecting families and public safety. The county said it supports the funding share and confirmed the courthouse can accommodate another judge. The hearing was then closed. The committee also heard House Bill 2500 on charitable beneficiary transfers, which would require financial institutions or insurers holding beneficiary-designated property to notify charities after a donor’s death, allow a standardized affidavit process, prohibit demands for personal information or account opening as a condition of payment, and require transfer within 30 days. Charitable organizations testified in support, describing long delays and burdensome paperwork, while credit unions and bankers raised concerns about identity verification, fraud risk, and operational timelines. House Bill 2595 on collateral attacks on criminal judgments would extend the filing deadline for personal restraint petitions from one year to three years and allow the Office of Public Defense to provide direct representation. Supporters argued the current deadline is too short for incarcerated people, especially juveniles and pro se litigants, while prosecutors and victim advocates opposed the bill, citing finality, workload, and victim retraumatization. The committee then heard House Bill 2597, which would create a state civil cause of action for violations of U.S. constitutional rights during civil immigration enforcement, with damages and attorney fees available and some immunity limitations. Supporters framed it as an accountability measure and a remedy for constitutional violations, while law enforcement and other opponents warned about unclear definitions, officer hesitation, and conflicts with federal immunity; the hearing ended with a note that executive session on HB 2597 would be scheduled later.

Bills: HB2198, HB2401, HB2462, HB2419, HB2210, HB2205, HB2249

Keywords: regulatory efficiency, permitting, licensing, executive order, state government, commission, gender equity, boys, men, advocacy, state policy, unpiloted aircraft, drones, regulation, airspace safety, privacy, address confidentiality, administrative law judges, privacy protection, staff employment

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several bills. HB 2462 would direct the governor to create rules for countering threats from unmanned aircraft systems, including training and possible National Guard support; the prime sponsor and National Guard witnesses said it would help law enforcement respond to drone threats around major events and critical infrastructure, while one testifier supported it with suggested amendments on law enforcement authority, a web portal, and data privacy. HB 2401 would create a Washington State Boys’ and Men’s Commission, contingent on private funding through 2029; the sponsor and many supporters described concerns about boys’ and men’s outcomes in education, mental health, suicide, loneliness, workforce participation, and fatherhood, while some witnesses asked that the commission also address physical health and root causes such as fatherlessness. HB 2198 would create a statewide credential catalog and online repository for permits, licenses, and certifications, require agencies to set processing timelines, and authorize fee refunds when deadlines are missed; the Governor’s Office, business groups, labor, and agency representatives testified in support, saying it would improve transparency, predictability, and speed for workers and employers. HB 2419 would expand the Address Confidentiality Program to cover administrative law judges and certain Office of Administrative Hearings staff; OAH and county officials supported it, citing threats against judges and clerks and asking that county clerks also be included. In executive session, the committee took action on three bills. It adopted an amendment to HB 2210 on ranked choice voting and then passed the bill 4-2 with one excused. It adopted an amendment to HB 2205 making threats against sports officials, coaches, or participants in wagered events a Class C felony and then passed the bill 5-1 with one excused. It also passed HB 2249 unanimously, 6-0 with one excused, to reclassify certain WATech employees performing network and security duties. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• And finally, rather than having 7.16 apply to the Superior Courts, have something similar to RCW 13.40.045

Bills: HB2389, HB2456

Keywords: juvenile justice, youth sentencing, juvenile rehabilitation, DCYF, Department of Children Youth and Families, community supervision, community transition services, suspended disposition, less restrictive alternative, sentencing grid, juvenile confinement, juvenile prison, rehabilitation, recidivism, mental health treatment, substance use disorder, chemical dependency, trauma-informed care, racial disparities, equity

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 2456, which would create a juvenile firearm early intervention alternative for youth charged with unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree. Staff explained that the bill would allow dismissal after successful completion of a prosecutor-approved, 12-month intensive supervision program with searches, therapy, mentorship, and regular court reviews, funded by a $100 increase to concealed pistol license fees. The prime sponsor said the bill is meant to fill the gap between arrest and final case resolution and to provide a cautious, evidence-based intervention; one member questioned whether the CPL fee increase functioned more like a tax than a fee. The chair then held further testimony on that bill. The committee then took extensive testimony on House Bill 2389, which would expand suspended disposition alternatives and other community-based options for juveniles, broaden eligibility for some offenses including robbery and assault, require mid-sentence review hearings, reduce some robbery standard ranges, and add juvenile rehabilitation capacity and emergency transfer provisions. Supporters, including youth currently or formerly in juvenile facilities, defense advocates, restorative justice groups, and some judges, argued the bill would reduce overcrowding, address racial disparities, improve rehabilitation, and give judges more individualized options. Several witnesses described personal experiences with trauma, incarceration, and the benefits of treatment and community support, while researchers testified that juvenile incarceration has limited rehabilitative value and that periodic review can improve outcomes. Opponents and those testifying with concerns, including prosecutors, sheriffs, county officials, juvenile court administrators, DCYF, and victims or victim advocates, argued the bill would shift burdens to counties without adequate funding, add appeals and hearings, and reduce accountability for serious offenses. They warned that the first part of the bill would effectively lower many standard ranges to local sanctions for offenses such as robbery, assault, arson, and drive-by shooting, and said community-based resources and staffing are not in place statewide. DCYF and Green Hill staff said overcrowding has improved but emergency transfer authority is still needed, while some witnesses urged changes to preserve revocation tools, clarify transfer standards, and add resources before expanding community placement.

Transcript Highlights:

• question at you after that, but, you know, Washington State is pretty progressive on a lot of our RCWs

Bills: SB5831, SB6031, SB6178, SB5928, SB5919

Keywords: mortgage modification, uniform regulations, homeowners, financial stability, foreclosure prevention, public safety, insurance fraud, law enforcement, crime prevention, penalties, SB6178, property insurance, insurance claims, assignment of benefits, AOB, post-loss assignment, post-loss benefits, homeowners insurance, policyholder, insured

Summary: The Senate Business, Trade & Economic Development Committee heard a tribal gaming compact amendment for the Squaxin Island Tribe and the Washington State Gambling Commission. Testifiers said the amended, restated compact consolidates six prior amendments, updates appendices, and adds new provisions for electronic table games and high-limit room options. The tribe and commission described the agreement as a clarification and modernization of the compact that supports tribal regulation, economic development, and public protection. No questions were raised, and the compact was presented as moving next through the commission and gubernatorial review process. The committee then held public hearings on three bills. SB 5831 would enact the Uniform Mortgage Modification Act, creating safe harbors so certain mortgage modifications do not affect lien priority in foreclosure; the sponsor, staff, and Uniform Law Commission said it clarifies current law and helps homeowners and businesses modify mortgages more easily. SB 6178, requested by the Insurance Commissioner, would prohibit post-loss assignments of insurance benefits to contractors in property claims; the sponsor, OIC, and supporting witnesses said it protects vulnerable homeowners after disasters from losing control of their claims, while still allowing direct payment to vendors. SB 6031, also requested by the Insurance Commissioner, would expand and modernize the state’s insurance fraud laws, make insurance fraud a Class B felony, broaden reporting and investigative authority, and improve restitution and prosecution tools; the OIC, anti-fraud groups, and insurers supported it, while the Washington Society of CPAs said concerns would be addressed by amendment. In executive session, the committee considered SB 5928 and SB 5919. Staff described SB 5928 as dealing with wildfire risk scores, insurer disclosure and appeals, rate-filing requirements, and confidentiality, with a proposed substitute making a mitigation-discount standard actuarially sound and correcting a drafting error. The committee adopted the substitute and advanced SB 5928 with a do-pass recommendation to Rules. The committee also advanced SB 5919, which encourages voluntary collaboration between fire districts and insurers on wildfire mitigation incentives for agricultural activities, with a do-pass recommendation to Rules.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2190 updates an RCW to make it unmistakably clear that compensation, the primary topic they

Bills: HB2144, HB2190, HB2191, HB2303, HB2345

Keywords: employee monitoring, workplace privacy, performance evaluations, notification, transparency, language access, collective bargaining, providers, healthcare, interpreters, social services, construction, wage theft, misclassification, independent contractor, employee classification, fringe benefits, prevailing wages, subcontractor liability, joint and several liability

Summary: The Labor and Workplace Standards Committee heard testimony on several bills. House Bill 2303 would prohibit employers from requesting or coercing employees to receive microchip implants, with enforcement through L&I complaints, civil penalties, and private lawsuits; Rep. Thomas said it would prevent a practice not currently used in Washington. House Bill 2144 would require employers to give written notice before using electronic monitoring for employee performance evaluations, with L&I penalties and a private right of action; supporters said workers should know how they are monitored, while business, local government, trucking, retail, banking, and law enforcement representatives raised concerns about broad definitions, safety/security uses, and litigation exposure. House Bill 2190 would allow language access providers to bargain over compensation for missed or canceled appointments; interpreters and labor supporters said the bill would make bargaining fairer and help retain interpreters, while no opposition testimony was recorded in the excerpt. The committee also heard House Bill 2345, a proposed substitute adjusting the employer/employee premium split for the state paid family and medical leave program to comply with IRS guidance and avoid federal tax treatment of benefits. The sponsor and supporters said the change is technical, intended to keep workers and employers harmless and avoid about $30 million in federal taxes, while some business and school district witnesses supported the goal but worried about preserving the current balance and the impact on employer costs. The hearing on 2345 was then closed. House Bill 2191, concerning liability for unpaid wages in the construction industry, drew extensive testimony. Supporters, including workers, unions, some contractors, the Attorney General’s office, and minority builders, said wage theft is real, that upstream liability would improve accountability and help workers get paid, and that responsible contractors should not be undercut by bad actors. Opponents from contractor, business, city, trucking, and minority contractor groups argued the bill is too broad, could raise costs, discourage small subcontractors, create double liability for general contractors and property owners, and should be narrowed with safe harbors or right-to-cure provisions. Members asked about enforcement, alternative remedies, and comparisons to Oregon law; L&I said it has some existing tools but limited ability when firms go out of business. The committee closed the hearing on HB 2191 and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• But unfortunately, we sit here today opposed to this legislation as, you know, 1365, it does amend RCW

Bills: HB1367, HB2172, HB2718, HB2139, HB2192, HB2307, HB2379, HB2467, HB2495, HB2604

Keywords: motorcycle safety, right shoulder, shoulder riding, limited access roadway, freeway, expressway, highway congestion, lane splitting, traffic safety, RCW, Washington traffic law, roadside assistance, emergency vehicles, tow truck, congested traffic, motorcyclist, route jurisdiction, abandonment, transportation, local governance

Summary: The committee began with a work session on the Washington State Transportation Commission’s route jurisdiction transfer study. Staff explained that counties own about 49% of center lane miles, cities 22%, and the state 9%, and that only 16 route jurisdiction transfers have occurred since the process began in 1991. The study found the current state highway system is generally well connected and did not need wholesale realignment, but recommended clarifying statutory criteria, improving the transfer process, and strengthening interagency coordination and recordkeeping. Members discussed why transfers happen, who pays for transferred roads, and how the Legislature should handle abandonments and major decommissionings. House Bill 2172 was then heard, which would fold large abandonments into the RJT process, require pre-request conferences, add cost/risk reporting, update highway criteria, and require legislative approval for certain decommissionings. Support came from Tacoma, the Transportation Commission, counties, cities, and the Transportation Improvement Board, while the sponsor said a substitute would narrow the bill so agreed transfers could proceed without final legislative approval. The committee next heard House Bill 1367, which would allow motorcycles to travel on the right shoulder of limited-access highways in slow or stopped traffic, subject to speed limits and other restrictions. The bill’s substitute would limit shoulder use to wider shoulders, require hazard lights, bar overtaking on the shoulder, and assign liability for debris-related damage to the rider while shielding governments from claims. Testimony was sharply divided: motorcycle advocates and some riders said the bill would reduce fatigue, heat stress, and rear-end risk, while the State Patrol and WSDOT opposed it as unsafe, especially because shoulders are used for emergencies, maintenance, and incident response and may contain debris. The Department of Licensing and WSDOT described potential implementation and maintenance costs. Substitute House Bill 2174 would create local or state “crash prevention zones” on roads with repeated serious collisions or fatalities, require public notice and an engineering/traffic study, increase enforcement, and impose a $73 penalty for certain infractions in the zone, with revenue dedicated to safety improvements. The sponsor said it was intended as a temporary tool for dangerous corridors such as Highway 395 and Highway 12, while counties and cities supported the concept but asked for liability protections similar to the Senate companion bill. Finally, House Bill 2718 proposed major permitting and project-delivery reforms for transportation projects, including deadlines for agency permit meetings and decisions, early tribal and local consultation, deemed approval in some cases, a public contractor rating website, and a report on further streamlining ideas. The sponsor framed it as a “shot clock” approach to reduce delays and costs, and members raised questions about how the contractor ratings would work and whether the bill would alter existing performance review systems.

Transcript Highlights:

• Updating RCW 70.38.128 allows safe non-emergent PCIs to be performed in licensed ASFs, expanding access

Bills: HB2545, HB2613, HB1496, HB2155, HB2283, HB2340, HB2425, HB2437, HB2577

Keywords: healthcare, patients, cardiovascular procedures, outpatient services, surgical facilities, HB2613, compounded medications, compounded drugs, pharmacy compounding, bulk drug substances, active pharmaceutical ingredients, API, drug safety, patient safety, pharmacy license, Washington pharmacy law, RCW 18.64, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, FDA, pharmaceutical compounding

Summary: The House Health Care and Wellness Committee held public hearings on House Bill 2545, which would direct the Department of Health to create rules allowing elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) at ambulatory surgical facilities, and House Bill 2613, which would add quality-assurance requirements for compounded drugs using bulk drug substances. On HB 2545, supporters including ambulatory surgery center representatives, cardiologists, and the prime sponsor argued the bill would improve access, reduce wait times, and lower costs while maintaining safety through patient selection and existing accreditation standards. Opponents from the hospital association argued that shifting PCI volume away from hospitals could undermine provider proficiency and the financial support hospitals use to maintain emergency cardiac services, and suggested the issue should be studied further. On HB 2613, the prime sponsor and several supporters said the bill was intended to address unsafe, large-scale compounding—especially weight-loss drugs—by requiring stronger sourcing, testing, and documentation of ingredients. Opponents from pharmacy, medical, hospital, clinic, and compounding groups argued the bill was overbroad, could restrict access to legitimate compounded medications, increase costs and delays, and in some cases conflict with existing federal and state compounding rules; some also urged narrowing the bill to focus on GLP-1 weight-loss products and exempt hospitals, nursing homes, and animal compounding. The sponsor of HB 2613 said amendments were being developed to narrow the scope and clarify the bill before executive session. In executive session, the committee considered six bills and then took final action on seven measures. It adopted amendments and advanced HB 1496, which limits fees for certain electronically stored health care information and changes attorney-fee provisions under the Uniform Health Care Information Act; HB 2283, which raises the medical loss ratio target for health plans to 90% with a delayed implementation date and added reporting authority for the insurance commissioner; HB 2425, which revises nurse delegation rules and delays implementation to 2028; and HB 2577, which clarifies hospital inspection timing and allows Department of Health flexibility in using CMS surveys as equivalent inspections. The committee also advanced HB 2155, addressing non-human entities using nursing titles; HB 2340, relating to substance use disorder monitoring program provisions for nursing assistants; and HB 2437, concerning Department of Health opioid treatment accreditation activities and associated fee authority. Votes were largely bipartisan, though several members voted no or without recommendation on some bills, especially HB 2283 and HB 2437. The meeting ended with all seven bills reported out of committee with due pass recommendations.

Bills: HB2479, HB2091, HB2105, HB2107, HB2151, HB2190, HB2191, HB2218, HB2243, HB2303, HB2345

Keywords: unpaid wages, wage theft, wage recovery, labor standards, Department of Labor and Industries, L&I, worker protection, low-wage workers, back pay, interest on wages, civil penalties, retaliation, immigration status coercion, gig workers, transportation network companies, rideshare drivers, app-based drivers, employment law, wage complaint, payroll enforcement

Summary: The Labor and Workplace Standards Committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2479, the Wage Recovery Act. Staff explained that the bill would create a wage recovery program and account to provide limited advance payments to low-wage workers facing immediate economic harm from unpaid wages, while also giving the Department of Labor and Industries more discretion to prioritize wage complaints and changing civil penalty rules for willful violations. Representative Fosse and several testifiers from labor, business, and legal groups described the bill as a bipartisan, consensus product of the Wage Recovery Work Group and said it would help workers recover wages faster while targeting repeat violators. No one testified in opposition, and the hearing was closed without questions from members. The committee then moved into executive session and took action on several bills. It reported House Bill 291, 2105, 2107, 2151, 2190, 2303, and 2345 out of committee with due pass recommendations, and deferred action on 2191 and 2218. House Bill 2105, concerning employer notice of federal I-9 audits and related worker-record access, was amended with a technical correction and a revised penalty amendment before passing 6-3. House Bill 2151, on factory-built housing and commercial structures, was amended to exempt certain prefabricated enclosures for utility energy equipment. House Bill 2303, prohibiting employer requests for microchip implantation, was amended to remove administrative enforcement and passed 6-3. House Bill 2345, which adjusts paid family and medical leave premium allocations in response to IRS guidance, passed unanimously after members described it as a technical fix to avoid a potential federal tax liability. Other bills passed without substantive controversy: House Bill 291 on employee contact information for bargaining representatives, House Bill 2107 on notifying employers of construction hazards, and House Bill 2190 on paying language access providers for missed appointments. The committee also heard briefings on proposed substitutes and amendments for the remaining bills before voting, and adjourned after completing its executive session actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• the event that any provision excluding activities from the definition of advertising services under RCW

Bills: SB6073, SB6113, SB6116, SB6129, SB6162, SB6114, SB5857

Keywords: SB 6073, LEOFF, Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System, retirement system, pension, public safety retirement, wildland firefighter, aviation firefighter, wildland fire, forest firefighter, Department of Natural Resources, DNR, firefighter benefits, retirement benefits, service credit, disability retirement, survivor benefits, employer contributions, Washington RCW, public employees

Summary: The Ways and Means Committee held public hearings on several tax and retirement-related bills. Senate Bill 6073 would move eligible Department of Natural Resources wildland and aviation firefighters from PERS into LEOFF 2 prospectively. Committee staff outlined the higher retirement age and benefit costs under LEOFF 2 and noted a small implementation cost and a modest actuarial rate increase. DNR and labor representatives supported the bill, saying the firefighters face significant physical and mental risks and deserve LEOFF coverage; a senator asked about LEOFF board review and was told the bill was requested by DNR, not the board. Senate Bill 6113 was presented as a set of technical and administrative tax-code fixes tied largely to last session’s ESSB 5814, including clarifying taxable retail services, use tax treatment, a transition period for businesses reclassified into retailing B&O, and other corrections. DOR said the bill codifies guidance and is revenue neutral, while several speakers from schools, arts groups, newspapers, broadcasters, and business organizations said some provisions go beyond technical cleanup and would continue or expand unintended consequences from last year’s tax changes. Concerns focused on sales tax treatment of school services, live presentations and rehearsals, and a new section affecting newspaper and broadcaster advertising exemptions if litigation is lost. Some business groups were supportive of the technical fixes but asked for amendments. Senate Bill 6116 would restore the vapor products tax structure for nicotine-containing vapor products, moving them back to the per-milliliter tax and restoring revenue distributions to the Andy Hill Cancer Research account and the Foundational Public Health Services account, retroactive to January 1, 2026. Supporters from public health and the cancer fund said the bill would correct an unintended diversion of revenue and preserve funding, while tobacco-control groups opposed lowering the tax on vapor products, arguing it would weaken public health policy. Retailers and harm-reduction advocates supported the bill, saying the 95% tax created compliance problems, harmed small businesses, and encouraged illicit sales. Senate Bill 6129 proposed a broader overhaul of nicotine and tobacco taxes, including a single 90% tax on nicotine products, a 10% flavor tax, higher cigarette taxes, and new distributions to cancer research and public health accounts. Public health, pediatric, and anti-tobacco groups strongly supported the bill as a way to reduce youth use and raise revenue, while retailers, tobacco businesses, and some consumers opposed it as regressive, harmful to small businesses, and likely to drive sales to illicit or out-of-state markets. Several speakers also raised concerns about tribal consultation, the treatment of menthol and flavored products, and the impact on modified-risk products. The committee also heard briefings and began testimony on Senate Bill 6162, a property tax reform bill that would expand senior and disability property tax relief, increase income thresholds and deductions, and consolidate the state property tax rate.

Transcript Highlights:

• I definitely spent some of my time looking at the underlying statute, cross-referencing the RCWs, and

Bills: SB5917, SB6080, SB6085, SB5940, SB5945, SB5957, SB5966

Keywords: abortion medications, reproductive health, mifepristone, misoprostol, abortion access, medication abortion, early pregnancy loss, miscarriage management, Department of Corrections, Department of Health, health care providers, health care entities, Indian health care providers, pharmacy distribution, wholesale distribution, reproductive rights, women's health, emergency clause, immediate effect, public health

Summary: The Senate Human Services Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 5917 would change how the Department of Corrections and Department of Health distribute abortion medications from state stockpiles, removing the current requirement that they be sold at cost plus a $5 fee and allowing broader, more flexible distribution to health care providers and entities. Supporters, including the bill sponsor, the Governor’s health policy advisor, DOH, and advocacy groups, said the change would prevent expiration of existing stockpiles and improve access to medication abortion and miscarriage care. Opponents argued the bill would effectively give away state-purchased drugs, raised constitutional and taxpayer concerns, and objected to abortion medication distribution. No vote was taken on SB 5917 in the hearing portion described. The committee also heard SB 6080, which would require written federal contracts before local jails accept people in federal custody, require reimbursement of full detention costs, and prohibit contracts for people transported across state lines absent a valid judicial warrant. The sponsor said the bill responds to a Clark County situation involving out-of-state detainees and is intended to create clarity, accountability, and local control. Support came from local government and immigrant-rights advocates, while the sheriffs’ association raised concerns about unintended consequences for routine federal arrests and the practicality of requiring contracts in all cases. The hearing then moved to SB 6085, which would revise the institutional welfare account (formerly the incarcerated individual betterment fund) to require more feedback from incarcerated people and families, annual reporting, and changes to allowable uses. The sponsor and DOC supported the bill’s intent, while the reentry council and DOC raised concerns about law library funding and the use of funds for reentry services. The committee also took executive action on other bills: a proposed substitute for SB 5940 was adopted and sent to Ways and Means after several amendments were rejected; SB 5957 passed to the Rules Committee; and SB 5966 on medically tailored meals passed to the Rules Committee after one amendment failed and members noted a floor amendment would be offered to address small-business participation.

Bills: HB2640, HB2161, HB2304, HB2445, HB2590, HB2412

Keywords: Uniform Commercial Code, business filings, legal filings, commercial transactions, UCC compliance, attorney general, legal authority, state powers, judiciary, civil rights, condominium, housing, warranty, property rights, construction, probate, estate administration, inheritance, heir finder, heir locator

Summary: The Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee met on January 30 for a public hearing on House Bill 2640 and then took executive action on several bills. HB 2640 would address unauthorized Uniform Commercial Code filings by allowing the Department of Licensing to refuse suspected harassing or fraudulent filings, creating an affidavit-based process to terminate wrongfully filed financing statements, allowing administrative review and court challenges, and adding criminal penalties for intentional unauthorized filings. Department of Licensing testimony supported the bill as an agency request and said it would provide a lower-barrier remedy for people harmed by abusive UCC filings; members questioned whether the department should be making legitimacy determinations and whether existing court remedies were sufficient. No vote was taken on HB 2640 at the hearing stage. In executive session, the committee advanced HB 2161, which expands attorney general civil investigative demand authority for certain civil rights and labor-related investigations, with a substitute clarifying that the authority does not apply to criminal investigations, bars improper use, and extends the response deadline from 20 to 30 days. The bill passed 7-5 with one excused. HB 2304, extending condominium warranty coverage to four-story buildings, passed unanimously. HB 2445, revising probate law and standards for personal representatives and third-party administrators, passed 10-2 with one excused, though some members warned it could slow legitimate probate matters. The committee also adopted an amendment to HB 2590, which exempts limited equity cooperatives from the Washington Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act unless they elect coverage, and then passed the substitute bill 8-4 with one excused. Finally, HB 2412, increasing the number of superior court judges in Yakima County from eight to nine, passed unanimously 12-0 with one excused. The meeting then adjourned.