Transcript Highlights:

• the members of the Arizona House of Representatives to extend a warm welcome to Commander Christian Olson
• machinist's mate nuclear first class Michael Buck, and electronics technician nuclear second class James
• specialist, machinist made nuclear, first class Michael Buck, electronics technician nuclear, second class James
• Electronics Technician Nuclear, Second Class James Davis, Machinist Nuclear, Second Class Nathaniel Paulinger

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Matt Olson, Assistant Attorney General for National Security Divisions, penned an op-ed to Time Magazine
• In a related development yesterday, acting Attorney General James McHenry moved to fire a number of career
• On Monday, Acting Attorney General James McHenry, at the direction of the White House, fired more than

Transcript Highlights:

• Jacqueline Olson? Jacqueline? Okay. Hello, committee members.
• My name is Jacqueline Olson, and I am a registered nurse with a background in oncology.
• My name is Jacqueline Olson, and I am a registered nurse with a background in oncology.
• I hold the James T.
• James T.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on a wide range of health insurance and public health bills, with most speakers focused on expanding coverage for specific treatments and services. Bills discussed included H. 1187/S. 792 on rehabilitation counselors, H. 1173/S. 692 on patient navigation, S. 2600 on scalp cooling for chemotherapy patients, S. 2599 on medically necessary treatment for port wine birthmarks, H. 1164 on licensed educational psychologists for child and adolescent mental health services, S. 754/H. 1254 on autism diagnosis and treatment by nurse practitioners and psychiatric nurse mental health clinical specialists, S. 714/H. 1137 on infectious disease response and coverage, and S. 791 on making nature a prescriptive therapeutic intervention. Speakers generally argued these bills would improve access, reduce out-of-pocket costs, and address gaps in current insurance reimbursement rules. Testimony in support emphasized personal stories and clinical evidence. Cancer patients and providers described the benefits of patient navigation and scalp cooling for dignity and quality of life during treatment. Boston Children’s Hospital staff and families said port wine birthmark treatment is medically necessary, can prevent complications, and should not be denied as cosmetic. Rehabilitation counselors and school psychologists argued their services are effective, cost-saving, and underused because they cannot bill insurance. Autism advocates said current insurance statutes are outdated because nurse practitioners and psychiatric nurse mental health clinical specialists already provide evaluations and should be recognized for reimbursement to avoid delays in early intervention. Public health and GLAD Law testimony supported stronger infectious disease coverage to remove barriers to testing, treatment, and PrEP access. The hearing also included extensive testimony on H. 1172, a bill requiring insurance coverage for detransition-related care. Supporters said it would ensure coverage for medically necessary care for people who regret or reverse gender transition, while opponents argued it would legitimize anti-trans narratives or, conversely, that detransition care is needed because transition procedures can cause harm. The committee also heard strong support for S. 791 from advocates who described nature access as a health intervention that could help with trauma, anxiety, substance use recovery, and environmental justice, with claims that insurance coverage and reduced park fees would improve access. No votes were taken during the transcript, and the chair repeatedly thanked speakers and moved through the long list of public testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Olson, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• Representative Olson, pass. Representative Olson, pass. Representative Rivera, aye.
• Representative Olson? Aye. Representative Rivero? Thank you. Representative Olson? Aye.
• Representative Olson. Mr.
• Representative Olson? Please proceed. Thank you.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This resolution was requested by the senator from Denver and myself and signed by the Honorable James
• From Post 103 we have Harry Giglio and Ken Olson.
• <c> Coleman</c><00:28:48.040><c> senior</c><00:28:48.440><c> president</c><00:28:49.520><c> of</c> James
• > And post 103 we have Harry Giglio and And post 103 we have Harry Giglio and Ken<00:29:37.440><c> Olson
• </c> Ken Olson. Ken Olson.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Olson: pass. Representative Olson: pass. Representative Rivera: aye.
• Representative Olson passed. Representative Rivera voted aye.
• Representative Olson: Mr. Chairman, may I please? Thank you.
• Representative Olson? Please proceed. Thank you.
• Would you move the Olson strike-everything amendment? Mr.

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 4043, which would require each school district and charter school, beginning in 2027, to ensure at least one employee at each school is trained in CPR, first aid, and AED use. The sponsor said he intended to amend the bill on the floor to ensure someone is trained at all times and to clarify AED language. The American Heart Association testified neutral with concerns, supporting CPR training but warning the bill could leave gaps if only one person is trained and noting the need for AED access and emergency planning. Parents whose son died in an Arizona kindergarten classroom urged support, saying school staff should be prepared to respond to emergencies. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a vote of 7-1 with four present. The committee then took up House Concurrent Resolution 2015, as amended by a strike-everything amendment supporting at least 60 minutes of daily physical activity for students and prominent display of federal dietary guidelines. A representative of End Chronic Disease testified in favor, arguing schools should help prevent chronic disease through health education and physical activity. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then gave the resolution a due pass recommendation on a 12-0 roll call. House Bill 2621, in its strike-everything form and with a Garcia amendment, addressed enrollment and special education procedures for students in unorganized territory, students using certificates of educational convenience, and children of active-duty military parents. The sponsor explained the bill was meant to clarify confusing law, speed enrollment and evaluations, and reduce delays in services. Champions for Kids supported the measure and the amendments, and the committee adopted both amendments before recommending the bill do pass 11-0. The committee also approved House Bill 2385, which limits superintendent contracts to one-year terms for the first three years unless the superintendent has already been employed three consecutive years; the sponsor framed it as a way to reduce costly early buyouts. That bill passed 7-4. Later, the committee approved House Bill 4106, creating the One Arizona Service Fellowship Program to provide service opportunities, stipends, and tuition awards for young adults, with an amendment changing the stipend contribution formula. The sponsor and supporters described it as a state-based service model inspired by Utah and aimed at education, military families, parks, hunger, and homelessness work; some members opposed it as an unnecessary state mandate or questioned the need for a new program. The committee also passed House Bill 2992, as amended, establishing a pilot program on child sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention, expanded to K-12 and including grooming/exploitation content. A survivor advocate strongly supported the bill, while some members raised concerns about the funding source and possible unintended consequences. Finally, the committee passed House Bill 2370, which would require school leaders to notify governing boards before modifying weapons detection systems and to report changes within 24 hours; the sponsor cited a fatal school stabbing and other weapons incidents, while opponents argued the bill was too vague and could create operational problems. The committee also adopted a strike-everything amendment to House Bill 4056, allowing legislators making public records requests in their official capacity to avoid fees and requiring electronic production; the sponsor said it was needed after districts sought large fees, while opponents warned it could burden public agencies. The committee then began discussion of House Bill 2478, which would create an Arizona Commission on Student Outcomes to study K-12 accountability, finance, graduation requirements, and related issues, with proposed amendments to add early childhood study and change commission membership, but the transcript cuts off before final action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, let's have a panel then of James McMahon, Russ Brown, and Brad Lane.
• James, James, why don't you go ahead? Sure. Thank you. Mr. Chair, good morning. Mr.
• Thank you, James.
• James. Good morning. Mr.
• James McMahon, if you could come up, we're going to get 60 seconds each.

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: The committee first heard Second Substitute Senate Bill 5880, which would allow cities and counties to use private laboratories accredited under ISO/IEC standards for blood or breath toxicology testing, accept private donations for that purpose, and reimburse the Washington State Patrol for evidence transport costs. Senator Wagoner said the bill is intended as a temporary fix for major toxicology backlog delays that are slowing impaired-driving cases and justice for victims. Members generally expressed support, but asked about out-of-state labs and possible amendments; staff noted the bill is silent on lab location. Testimony later emphasized that the bill could help some jurisdictions but would not solve the backlog without additional state funding, and defense representatives asked for discovery protections if outside labs are used. The committee indicated it would work on amendments and planned executive action the following Tuesday. The committee also heard Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5436, which creates a gross misdemeanor and civil remedies for willfully or recklessly interfering with access to or from a place of worship, including physical obstruction, trespass, repeated harassing calls or electronic communications, and threats. Senator Solomon said the bill responds to rising intolerance and is modeled on existing protections for health care facilities, while also noting ongoing discussions about possible amendments, including concerns about immigration enforcement and other lawful police activity. Supporters from the Anti-Defamation League, Faith Action Network, the Jewish Community Relations Council, and the Sikh Coalition described harassment, threats, and security costs faced by faith communities and said the bill would protect safe access to worship. The criminal defense bar and law enforcement groups raised concerns about overbreadth and unintended consequences, urging clearer intent language and exemptions for officers and place-of-worship staff; the committee ran out of time before further action. Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5105, dealing with sexually explicit depictions of minors, was then heard. The bill would expand existing child sexual abuse material offenses to cover digitally created or altered obscene depictions even when no identifiable minor can be proven, extend the statute of limitations from three to ten years, adjust defenses and immunities, and broaden sexual exploitation of a minor to include knowingly causing an unconscious or unaware minor to be photographed or included in a live performance. Supporters from the Attorney General’s Office, prosecutors, and law enforcement said the bill is needed because AI and digital editing are making it harder to prosecute harmful material and that the bill targets conduct that harms children and facilitates abuse. Defense and sentencing representatives argued the bill may still raise First Amendment problems, especially where no actual minor is identifiable, and urged narrowing language. The committee did not take final action on this bill during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• James and it's Excess Spending 101 and explains everything about the uh calculating the excess spending
• Representative Olson. >> Uh, yeah, thanks very much. Good explanation.
• Representative James. >> Thanks, Representative Campbell.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I, James Moore, with the Department of Finance.
• James Moore, with the department. What was the benefit or what was the thought behind that?
• James Moore with the Department of Finance.
• Julia Hall with the Association of California Water Agencies would just align my comments with Beth Olson

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard two measures: AB 107, a budget bill junior making largely technical changes to the 2023, 2024, and 2025 budget acts, and AB 117, a trailer bill authorizing a $590 million loan structure to support four Bay Area transit agencies through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission using unallocated Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds. Finance explained AB 107 included technical fixes such as extending encumbrance periods, updating federal authority, correcting fiscal language, moving $20 million for California travel promotion from Visit California to GoBiz, and adding an APA exemption for implementation of already-approved climate bond programs. AB 117 was described as a cost-neutral regional solution with a 12-year loan term, two years interest-only, and repayment secured through existing state transit funding streams, with oversight by CalSTA, CTC, and MTC to limit impacts on other projects. Members raised concerns about transparency, competitive bidding, and whether APA exemptions and no-bid or emergency processes could reduce oversight, while supporters argued the exemptions were needed to get voter-approved climate and wildfire-related funds out the door. On AB 117, senators questioned whether the loan could become a de facto bailout if a Bay Area sales tax measure fails, whether post-pandemic ridership declines and safety/fare-evasion issues are temporary or structural, and whether the loan could jeopardize TIRCP-funded capital projects such as BART Phase 2. Transit agencies and local representatives testified in support, saying ridership is recovering, the loan is critical to avoid service cuts, and the Bay Area economy depends on transit stability. The committee first passed AB 107 on a 9-4 vote and AB 117 on a 9-4 vote, then held both bills on call. After recess, absent members returned and both measures were lifted from call and passed with 11 votes each. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I, James Moore, with the Department of Finance.
• James Moore, with the department. What was the benefit, or what was the thought behind that?
• James Moore with the Department of Finance.
• Julia Hall with the Association of California Water Agencies would just align my comments with Beth Olson

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Budget Committee heard two bills: AB 107, a budget bill junior making largely technical changes to the 2023, 2024, and 2025 budget acts, and AB 117, a trailer bill authorizing a $590 million loan to Bay Area transit agencies through the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program. Finance explained that AB 107 mainly extends encumbrance periods, updates federal authority, makes climate bond-related adjustments, adds an APA exemption for implementing already-approved climate bond programs, and moves $20 million for tourism promotion from Visit California to GoBiz. AB 117 would route TIRCP funds through CalSTA and MTC to support BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit, with a 12-year loan term, two years interest-only, and repayment tied to existing transit funding streams; Finance said the arrangement is cost-neutral to the state and intended to avoid impacts to other projects. Committee discussion focused on transparency, oversight, and whether the APA exemption in AB 107 and the transit loan in AB 117 were appropriate. Several senators questioned the use of no-bid or expedited processes, the need for labor standards on orphan well work, and whether the transit loan could become a de facto bailout if a Bay Area sales tax measure fails. Finance and LAO representatives responded that the loan has repayment protections, monitoring by CalSTA and CTC, and is separate from the ballot measure, though members raised concerns about ridership declines, fare evasion, safety, and long-term transit finances. Public comment largely supported both bills, with transit agencies and local governments backing AB 117 and water, parks, and conservation groups supporting the APA exemption in AB 107; San Jose urged safeguards to protect BART Phase 2 TCEP funds. Both bills initially received 9-4 votes and were placed on call, then later were lifted and passed with 11 votes each after absent members returned. The committee adjourned after both AB 107 and AB 117 were reported out.

Transcript Highlights:

• I, James Moore, with the Department of Finance.
• James Moore, with the department. What was the benefit or what was the thought behind that?
• James Moore with the Department of Finance.
• Julia Hall with the Association of California Water Agencies would just align my comments with Beth Olson

Summary: The Senate Budget Committee heard two bills: AB 107, a budget bill junior making largely technical changes to the 2023, 2024, and 2025 Budget Acts, and AB 117, a trailer bill authorizing a regional transit loan package for Bay Area agencies. Department of Finance staff said AB 107 contains no new state money or new policy items, but makes adjustments such as extending encumbrance periods, updating federal authority, moving $20 million in tourism promotion funding from Visit California to GoBiz, and adding an APA exemption for certain climate bond program guidelines. AB 117 would allow CalSTA to loan up to $590 million from unallocated Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds to MTC, which would then lend to BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit; the loans would run 12 years with two years interest-only, and the state said the structure is intended to be cost-neutral and protected by repayment safeguards. Committee discussion focused heavily on transparency, oversight, and whether the transit loan could jeopardize future projects or become a de facto bailout if a Bay Area sales tax measure fails. Several senators questioned the need for the APA exemption in AB 107, arguing that emergency or existing public processes might provide better oversight, while supporters said the exemption was needed to get voter-approved climate bond funds out the door and that the language had already been agreed to in the budget process. On AB 117, senators raised concerns about declining ridership, fare evasion, safety, post-pandemic travel patterns, repayment sources, and the impact on other TIRCP projects such as BART Phase 2. Finance staff and transit representatives responded that ridership changes were driven by COVID-era shifts, labor and safety issues, and changing commute patterns, and that the loan would be secured against existing state transit assistance streams rather than general fund dollars. Public comment was largely supportive of both bills. Water, natural resources, and environmental groups backed the APA exemption in AB 107, saying it would speed implementation of Proposition 4 funding for water recycling, wildfire, coastal resilience, and related projects. Transit agencies and labor groups supported AB 117, saying the loan is needed to stabilize operations and preserve service while local revenue measures and efficiency efforts are pursued; San Francisco, Caltrain, BART, and AC Transit all testified in favor, though San Jose asked for stronger protections for previously approved TIRCP-funded projects. The committee first passed AB 107 and AB 117 on 8-4 and 9-4 votes, placed them on call, then later lifted the calls and both bills ultimately passed with 11 votes each and were sent out of committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, let's have a panel then of James McMahon, Russ Brown, and Brad Lane.
• James, James, why don't you go ahead? Sure. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Good morning, Mr.
• Thank you, James.
• James. Good morning. Mr.
• James McMahon, if you could come up, we're going to get 60 seconds each.

Summary: The committee heard briefings and testimony on several bills, with members repeatedly noting limited time and that some measures were already familiar from prior hearings. Second Substitute Senate Bill 5880 would allow cities and counties to use ISO/IEC-accredited private toxicology labs for blood or breath testing, accept private donations for that purpose, and reimburse the State Patrol for evidence transport costs. Senator Wagoner said the bill is a temporary fix for a major toxicology backlog that delays justice; prosecutors, police chiefs, and the Seattle City Attorney supported it as a way to relieve the backlog, while defense representatives said it would not solve the problem and raised due process concerns about out-of-state labs and access to witnesses. Members discussed possible amendments on in-state/out-of-state labs and litigation logistics, and the bill was set for executive action the following Tuesday. Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5436 would create a gross misdemeanor for willfully or recklessly interfering with access to or from a place of worship or disrupting religious services through obstruction, trespass, repeated calls or electronic communications, or threats. Senator Solomon said the bill responds to rising intolerance and is modeled on protections for health care facilities; supporters from the Anti-Defamation League, Faith Action Network, Jewish and Sikh community organizations described harassment, threats, and security costs at houses of worship. Defense and law enforcement groups raised concerns about overbreadth, possible impacts on peaceful protest, and unintended effects on law enforcement or immigration enforcement, and asked for clarifying amendments. The sponsor said he was open to changes, and the committee indicated it would continue working on the bill before executive action next Tuesday. Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5105 would expand child sexual abuse material offenses to cover digitally created or altered obscene depictions, even when the minor is not identifiable, extend the statute of limitations for those felony offenses from three to ten years, and broaden sexual exploitation of a minor to include knowingly causing a minor who is unconscious or unaware to be photographed or part of a live performance. Supporters including the Attorney General’s Office, prosecutors, and sheriffs’ chiefs said the bill is needed to address AI and other technology that can evade current law and to keep pace with rapidly changing digital abuse material. Opponents from the defense bar and the Sentencing Guidelines Commission argued the bill may still be overbroad and raise First Amendment problems under Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, especially where no actual minor is identified. The committee also heard and then quickly acted on other bills: Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5268, requiring one year of community custody for unlawful possession of a firearm, was amended and reported out due pass as amended; Engrossed Senate Bill 5272, addressing penalties for violence against referees and school volunteers, was reported out due pass; and Engrossed Senate Bill 5286, concerning reimbursement for costs in cities with state psychiatric hospitals, was also reported out due pass.

Transcript Highlights:

• James. No. Kolb. No. Landen. No. Larson. Aye. Love. Aye. McKeown. No. Nethercott. No. Olsen. No.
• I, Senators Prego, Crum, Kolb, Olson, excused Hicks, signed Senator Olson, Chairman.
• Senator Olson, would you please explain the bill, please? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• Thank<01:08:52.640><c> you,</c><01:08:52.719><c> Chairman</c><01:08:53.040><c> Olson.
• Senator Olson. All right, Mr. Chairman. I see a way for two amendments here.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Bart Anderson, um, and then Jeremy Olson Eilert.
• &gt;&gt; Um Bart Anderson, then Jeremy um Olson &gt;&gt; Um Bart Anderson, then Jeremy um Olson Alert
• You did. >> The James Otis Jr. in the 1760s. >> It wasn't the Tea Party.
• You did. >> The James Otis Jr. in the 1760s. >> It wasn't the Tea Party.
• You did. >> The James Otis Jr. in the 1760s. >> It wasn't the Tea Party.

Bills: HF4841, HF4234, HF3697

Keywords: Hennepin County, sales tax, health care facilities, ballpark improvements, tax revenue, HF4234, Minnesota private activity bonds, tax-exempt bonds, bond cap, aggregate bond limitation, residential rental projects, multifamily housing, affordable housing finance, housing bonds, public finance, bond allocation, private activity bond cap, Minnesota Statutes 474A.02, tax committee, tax refund

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker Pro Tem and members, today is my seatmate's birthday, Representative James Taylor.
• Representative Way, Representative Taylor, Representative Olson, how do you vote?

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker Pro Tem and members, today is my seatmate's birthday, Representative James Taylor.
• Representative Way, Representative Taylor, Representative Olson, how do you vote?

Summary: The House met in regular session, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, approved the prior journal, and recognized several guests and personal privileges, including introductions of students and family members. The chamber also took up a motion to request the Senate return SB 1160 for reconsideration, and then moved into Committee of the Whole to consider measures on the calendar. In Committee of the Whole, members considered SB 1118, SB 1178, and SB 1419. SB 1118 received an appropriations committee amendment and a floor amendment related to balancing housing affordability with historic preservation, and was recommended do pass as amended. SB 1178, dealing with naturopathic medicine accreditation and scope issues, drew debate: supporters said it would protect patient access and provider supply by updating accreditation-related definitions, while opponents argued it expanded scope too far and sidestepped federal accreditation concerns; the bill was ultimately recommended do pass as amended. SB 1419, concerning solar energy devices and disclosure protections for residential, multifamily, commercial, and industrial units, was also amended and recommended do pass as amended. SB 1497 was retained on the calendar. The House then entered an additional Committee of the Whole for SB 1242 and SB 1270. SB 1242, which allows audio and audio-visual technology for mental health evaluations or treatment hearings, was amended to modify the definition of a mental health treatment agency and recommended do pass as amended. SB 1270 also received a floor amendment and was recommended do pass as amended. The House adopted the Committee of the Whole and additional Committee of the Whole reports, properly engrossing SB 1118, SB 1178, SB 1419, SB 1242, and SB 1270, while retaining SB 1497. On third reading, the House passed SB 1162, SB 1274, SB 1426, SB 1552, and SB 1814. SB 1814, which establishes a substance use disorder treatment standards and oversight study committee, drew remarks in support of a study committee to address fraud, waste, abuse, and treatment reform. The House also announced upcoming committee and caucus meetings and adjourned until 10 a.m. Wednesday, April 29, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• District 22A: Bjorn Olson present. District 22B: Terry Stier present.
• District 28A: James "Jimmy" Gordon present. District 28B: Max Rymer present.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• could please have these folks come up to testify: Jane Melhance, Kim Anderson or Anderson Kim, Lisa Olson
• My name is Lisa Olson. I'm a lifelong resident of Washington, and I strongly oppose 2521.
• My name is James Teakin.
• My name is James Teakin.
• James Hovey.

Bills: HB2521, HB2249, HB1796

Keywords: firearms, background check, gun control, public safety, legislation, HB 2249, Washington Technology Solutions, WaTech, civil service, classified service, exempt employees, state employment, state personnel, network security, cybersecurity, information technology, IT contracting, data center, systems integration, network engineering

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Olson now made his final pass. The bill will there be debate? Not seen debate.
• We have our president of our chamber of commerce, James Bell, here.

Bills: HB3419, HB4153, HB3430, HB3791, HB3277, HB4119, HB4408, HB3905, HB3968, HB3835, HB3386, HB2650, HB3742, HB3588, HB3748, HB4303, HB4311, HB3028, HB4428, HB4429, HB4132, HB1889, HB3265, HB1739, HB4434, HB3313, HB3852, HB4263, HB3413, HB3414, HB3415, HB3416, HB3417, HB3418, HB3420, HB2116, HB2206, HB3625, HB2939, HB3721, HB1823, HB2425, HB4440, HJR1087, HB4003, HJR1077, HB1770, HB1675, HB3627, HB3891, HJR1067, HB3462, HJR1053, HJR1054, HJR1044, HB3472, HB1225, HJR1019, HB4145, HJR1081, HB1746, HJR1069, HJR1050, HB1638, HB3327, HJR1055, HB3127, HB4488, HB2955, HB3781, HB3783, HB3802, HB2471, HB2937, SCR16, HB2960, HB3466, HB3262, HB3269, HB3152, HB4140, HB4142, HB3148, HB3378

Keywords: corruption, nonpublic information, government accountability, criminal law, public office, driver license, reading proficiency, minors, education requirements, alternative testing, attendance, remedial reading, public school, oath of enrollment, court financial obligations, cost hearing, payment plan, community service, court compliance program, debt relief

Transcript Highlights:

• Olson here. Osburn here. Pay, Pay. Paskowski here. Piper here. Piper here. Provenzano, Provenzano.
• , our exceptional team, plus their four amazing coaches: Coach Walker, Coach Teo, Kylie, and Coach James

Keywords: 914, all