Transcript Highlights:

• And again, going back to the okay, how is our process here a bit different than other actions?
• c><00:32:01.919> our going back to the okay, how is our going back to the okay, how is our process
• here a bit different than than process here a bit different than than other<00:32:04.799> uh<
• <00:52:18.720> that<00:52:19.040> he assessment and admissions that he assessment and
• admissions that he suffers<00:52:19.599> from<00:52:19.760> these<00:52:20.079> issues

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission met on November 18, 2025, approved the October 14 minutes, and then took up five motions in ethics matters 24LEC3 and 24LEC6. Those motions included a renewed motion to dismiss and motion to quash by Representative Daniel Gberg, a renewed motion to compel/sanctions and continuance request by Mr. Jenkins, and competing motions in limine concerning evidence and redaction of deposition transcripts. Vice Chair Mike Schaw was appointed hearing officer for the motion practice, and the commission agreed to hear the motions one at a time in open session. Representative Chris Lily joined later by Zoom. Counsel for Representative Gberg argued the remaining allegations were minor, that the commission lacked key exculpatory materials such as an alleged LRC report, policies, procedures, and training materials, and that the record did not support the ethics charges. She also argued the case had been broadened by extraneous allegations and that the respondent had been unfairly prejudiced. Enforcement counsel responded that he had produced all materials in his possession, that any LRC materials were not in the commission’s custody, and that the commission’s probable-cause findings were based on sworn testimony and affidavits already in the record. He argued the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment should be denied because genuine issues of material fact remained and the commission had already found probable cause on three ethics violations. Commission members questioned both sides about the alleged LRC report and whether it was part of the commission’s record. The chair stated the commission had not relied on any LRC report and had not withheld anything, while another member emphasized that the proceeding concerned alleged violations of the ethics code, not LRC sexual-harassment policy. A commissioner also noted the unusual structure of the proceeding and questioned whether the complaints, taken as true, stated a basis for dismissal. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the standard for dismissal and summary judgment, with no final ruling on the motions captured in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:04:06.799> So, go that process if you don't mind.
• So, go that process if you don't mind.
• We just need to speed the process and provide them with more years to rebuild their lives.
• <00:12:17.519> There's of efficacy well beyond process.
• There's of efficacy well beyond process.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board met with a quorum, approved the November 12 minutes by voice vote, and then heard a presentation from former Governor Ernie Fletcher and Dave Johnson on Medicaid reimbursement for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Fletcher argued that addiction should be treated as a chronic disease requiring a longer continuum of care, not just short residential stays, and said recovery should combine clinical treatment with social supports such as housing, transportation, employment, peer coaching, and recovery housing. He cited data on overdose trends, low treatment rates, and high costs for people with SUD, and said current reimbursement models create poor incentives and do not adequately support long-term recovery or measure outcomes well. Fletcher proposed a “carve through” model administered at the MCO level with standardized metrics, data sharing, and an independent recovery coordinator that would assess patients, coordinate care, and connect them to clinical and social recovery services. He suggested using bundled payments, shared savings, and partial risk arrangements, with recovery housing reimbursed on a PMPM or weekly basis and funded in part through existing Medicaid spending and other sources such as opioid abatement funds. He also emphasized peer support, telemedicine, criminal justice coordination, workforce and education supports, and the use of technology, including text messaging and possibly AI, to maintain long-term follow-up and identify relapse risk. Members questioned how the model would work in practice, especially the education and staffing requirements for recovery coordinators, reimbursement levels, and how many patients each coordinator or peer would serve. Fletcher said peers could be certified and would need additional training in assessments such as ASAM and recovery residence standards, but he did not give a precise salary figure, saying the market and bundled rates would determine that. He also said follow-up should continue for years, noting relapse risk over the first 18 to 24 months and that meaningful employment and ongoing peer contact help sustain recovery. No formal vote or action was taken on the substance use presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• involves uh the cells uh disease process involves uh the cells within<00:42:22.960> the<00:42
• called endothelial to meenal process called endothelial to meenal transition<00:42:33.000> and
• So we focus on Minnesota residents as part of the admissions process, but it's incredibly competitive
• So we focus on Minnesota residents as part of the admissions process, but it's incredibly competitive
• The admissions process is incredibly competitive to get into Mayo, and the numbers will fluctuate from

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• MDH must adopt regulations establishing a retrospective review process for special pediatric hospitals
• review process for special pediatric<00:20:48.960> hospitals.
• be conducted by a review process be conducted by a licensed<00:21:20.280> physician.
• in another jurisdiction or that process in another jurisdiction or that self-certifies<00:31:42.880>
• This is through the regulatory process. We're putting it in statute.

Keywords: Senate streaming session for Wednesday, April 8, 2026, 960, senate, all

Summary: The Senate reconvened with a quorum present and proceeded through a series of committee reports and floor actions, mostly on House bills. Several measures were advanced without opposition, often after brief floor explanations and unanimous adoption of committee amendments. Topics included behavioral health rate-setting modernization (HB 772), expedited Medicaid eligibility for relocated individuals with developmental disabilities (HB 1015), perinatal behavioral health screening and coverage (HB 1118), mammogram notices about breast arterial calcification (HB 1364), menopause provider training and coverage (HB 1365), cannabis licensing and training changes (HB 622), cemetery sale and transfer oversight (HB 892), travel services insurance requirements (HB 994), cash transaction rounding authorization (HB 1026), specie as legal tender (HB 1312), menstrual hygiene product ingredient labeling (HB 1357), health care quality reporting and a health centralization commission (HB 1372), special pediatric hospital transfer and review procedures (HB 1376), telehealth continuity of care for out-of-state counselors (HB 1483), and child placement protections for unlicensed settings and pediatric overstay patients (HB 1559). Most of these bills were ordered passed for third reading after the chamber adopted the committee amendments and favorable reports. The Senate also considered environmental and consumer-related measures. HB 146 would delay implementation dates for onsite wastewater system regulation and licensing requirements, while striking provisions on inspections and pumping for rental properties and sales. HB 254, a Department of Natural Resources bill, was described as facilitating community engagement in planning and development of departmental projects. HB 969 on retail electric vehicle fuel sales and charging equipment requirements was also taken up and reported favorably. In each of these cases, members noted no committee opposition and no fiscal impact, and the bills were advanced. Two bills were set aside rather than immediately acted on. HB 1037, concerning a Public Service Commission study on broadband and voice over internet protocol service, was special ordered until Friday at the request of a senator. HB 1312, the specie/legal tender bill, prompted questions about the definition of specie and was also special ordered for consideration the next morning. No roll-call votes were recorded in the excerpt; actions were taken by unanimous consent on amendments and committee reports, with multiple bills ordered to third reading.

Transcript Highlights:

• Member question: What is the current process now?
• It also didn't make it to the final process.
• Yeah, for admissions we do follow the HAR, and that is not allowable as it's currently written.
• <00:46:03.839> okay didn't make it to the final process okay didn't make it to the final process
• Yeah, I don't know what the county processes are on disregards, but is the county's land, right?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The hearing covered Senate Bill 426, which would create an early learning apprenticeship grant program. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive from the City and County of Honolulu, the Department of Human Services, the Executive Office on Early Learning, the University of Hawaiʻi College of Education, the Attorney General’s office, the Early Childhood Action Strategy, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, the University of Hawaiʻi’s early childhood educator project, and a Zoom testifier who described the importance of investing in high-quality early childhood education. Committee discussion focused on the program’s estimated cost, with figures of about $14.5 million in 2025-26 and $15 million in 2026-27, and on whether the program would require ongoing base-budget funding. The committee recommended technical, non-substantive amendments, including a statewide-concern amendment and a deferred effective date, and both committees adopted the recommendation by vote. The committees then heard Senate Bill 1622, which would appropriate funds to establish the Aloha Intelligence Institute within the University of Hawaiʻi to support statewide artificial intelligence initiatives. University representatives described the proposal as the product of campus-wide input and outlined five pillars: governance and policy, outreach and engagement, research and development, workforce development, and AI tools for key sectors such as health care, creative industries, manufacturing, data science, astronomy, and climate change. Members questioned staffing distribution, tuition, enrollment timing, housing, campus placement, and whether positions would be permanent or temporary; the university said it planned about 10 positions across campuses, would start with internal resources, and would house the effort under the Vice President for Research and Innovation initially. The committees recommended an SD1 with the appropriation amounts blanked out, a July 31, 2050 effective date, and committee-report language on housing and West Oʻahu, and the higher education and labor/technology committees adopted the amended recommendation. Finally, the Higher Education Committee took up Senate Bill 1488, a housekeeping measure to consolidate existing University of Hawaiʻi conference center statutes into a single revolving fund structure, and Senate Bill 636, which would fund retention and internship coordinator positions and broader enrollment management efforts at the University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo. SB 1488 drew university support and no opposition. SB 636 prompted substantial questioning about Hilo’s declining enrollment, current retention rate of 72.8 percent, and the scope of the request, which includes not only two named positions but also about $432,000 for enrollment management initiatives such as data analysis, IT support, and other student services. Hilo said it is targeting 3 to 5 percent annual enrollment growth and that the positions would support recruitment, retention, internships, and data-driven enrollment strategy. The committee pressed for a clearer broader plan, but the discussion in the transcript ended before a final vote on SB 636 was shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• But we went through the hearing process with DES, and after a hearing before the Wetlands Council, a
• <01:21:22.520> with went through the hearing process with went through the hearing process
• Where are you in that process?"
• process process my<01:38:29.800> my<01:38:29.960> apologies<01:38:30.440> for<01
• towards revamping our entire our process towards revamping our entire approach<01:38:50.360> to

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So it's important that we take up this bill now and begin the process of fixing Minnesota law.
• So it's important that we take up this bill now and begin the process of fixing a Minnesota law.
• She was denied admission to medical school because she was a girl, which forced her to apply to law school
• She was denied admission to medical school because she was a girl that forced her to apply to law school

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, how does this strengthen the licensure process for a person's coming in and seeking alternative
• Because even if a student admission.
• Currently, the EFA program has rolling admissions so that students can be accommodated throughout the
• <01:29:47.440> so<01:29:47.679> that program has rolling admissions so that program
• They get due process and they get the least restrictive environment.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then if it's a legal process in Montana to do that, I'm not saying it's not tax evasion.
• So the enforcement is through the Missouri Department of Revenue, through an assessment process.
• I think it's part of the process. I think it's part of the deterrence. Representative Ely.
• I think it's part of the process. I think it's part of the deterrence.
• ..of the way the process works, you know, and the file.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They will be in the process of seeking that.
• They have to actually have a process and system in place to do that.
• Act and the process by which any university...
• So this basically would require that ACH set up a process and whether or not they adopted that process
• Um, it's just helping with the process, having them... helping with the process, having them apply and

Bills: HB46, HB379, SB22, HB487, HB273, HB525

Keywords: rural physician, tax credit, healthcare access, physician recruitment, Alabama, HB379, Alabama income tax, nonresident exemption, remote workers, traveling employees, mobile workforce, withholding tax, state tax reciprocity, multistate employees, temporary work, work location tracking, time and attendance system, remote work taxation, professional athlete, professional entertainer

Transcript Highlights:

• HB 1005 by Toth relating to the process of candidacy. for the committee on elections.
• HB 1012 by Toth relating to the process.
• for the committee on pensions investments and financial services HB 1087 by scoffie relating to the process
• HB 1179 by Hinojosa relating to the admission policy of open enrollment charter schools for the committee
• prospective residential landlord from increasing the amount of rent during the rental application process

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You're deregulating the test process. You're saying they don't have to get those subtests.
• And these testing... ...process. You're saying they don't have to get those subtests.
• We cannot continue in the process that we're going.
• So all that documentation still has to go to the academy as part of their process for the waiver.
• There's already a waiver process in the academy.

Keywords: 964, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Military members also have to go through the process to get approved and submit paperwork, even though
• Even if you're in a county area, you have to go through this process, and you can do it.
• This was a request from the National Guard to clarify the process. Excellent.
• Industry, and so they will have input in the process. We welcome legislative input as well.
• That whole process was just, but we are excited about this. We think... We're excited about this.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, it says that this reg was amended to make several updates to the dental hygienist licensure process
• The dental hygienist licensure process clarifies that applicants can meet licensure requirements
• They're really not shopping for a hospital admission.
• They're really not shopping for a hospital admission.
• They're really not shopping for a hospital admission.

Keywords: 00:00 Call to Order/Roll Call 00:16 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations 25:49 Discussion of Hospital Rate Improvement Plan 58:50 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The committee began by reviewing a large slate of administrative regulations and explaining that it does not approve regulations but can find them deficient and send them back for further work. Members then asked questions on several items, including EMS reciprocity, dental hygienist licensure, and interpreter licensure. The EMS board explained that reciprocity would extend to applicants from any state, not just contiguous states, because the underlying statute had been amended. On the dental regulation, staff said the changes mainly clarified licensure requirements, reinstatement fees, and that dental hygienists administering local anesthetic must do so under direct dentist supervision. The most extended discussion involved the Board of Interpreters for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. The board chair said the main concern was that the EIPA is an educational specialty assessment, not a nationally recognized certification, yet the regulation would allow it to support full licensure. Members discussed whether that could let educational interpreters work outside their intended scope and whether a separate educational license or statutory change would be more appropriate. The board said it did not think the regulation could be fixed further at this point and suggested a statute could create a narrower educational interpreter license. After discussion, the committee voted to defer both related interpreter regulations, 201 KAR 39:030 and the companion regulation, for further work. The committee then took up two community mental health regulations, 907 KAR 1:044 and 907 KAR 5:005, which had been found deficient in Administrative Regulations. Department for Medicaid Services staff said the rules would expand and rename the mental health associate role as a behavioral health associate, making the role available in many more facilities, but would also require additional coursework or progress toward licensure. Some members and providers raised access-to-care concerns, especially for rural areas and unlicensed staff already working in the field. Staff said the proposal had been revised through work with CMHCs and licensing boards, but the committee ultimately voted to defer both regulations as well. After finishing the regulation review, the committee heard a presentation from the Kentucky Hospital Association on the ATRIP hospital rate improvement program. Hospital representatives said ATRIP is a Medicaid state-directed payment program funded through a provider tax and federal matching dollars, allowing hospitals to receive payments tied to quality measures. They reported improvements including lower Medicaid readmissions, high sepsis screening rates, reduced infections and opioid prescribing, expanded postpartum depression and suicide screening, and training for more than 1,000 people. They said the program has helped hospitals invest in staffing and quality improvement and warned that without it, many hospitals would face severe financial strain.

Transcript Highlights:

• Alienation should not be admissible in Alienation should not be admissible in court.
• , post-deprivation process satisfies the requirements of the due process clause.
• :07:14.880> of process satisfies the requirements of process satisfies the requirements of the
• the due process clause. the due process clause.
• communication, and lawful process. communication, and lawful process.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So access requires us to conduct a process.
• So basically approaches trial oriented process is paramount to avoid suppression issues.
• They're evidence process. And 24 hours, 3rd degree, felony burglary. Purple goes in.
• I believe process works.
• We can only process with the with the human resources that we have available.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The question was just really about the process of who approves that.
• The question was just really about the process of who approves that.
• The process of who approves that.
• implications, they have process implications, they have process implications.<01:04:31.440> Um
• But our process is nonpartisan, rigorous, and transparent.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But what we're here to talk about is the redistricting process.
• And I urge you to resist a process.
• We want to be part of that process.
• That’s what makes this process very wrong.
• We will take those through the process.

Summary: The Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting met virtually for its West Texas regional hearing, established a quorum, and explained that the hearing was part of a series of statewide information-gathering sessions before any map was filed. The chair outlined the Zoom procedures, the two-minute testimony limit, and the availability of written comments through the committee’s public portal. Senators also discussed the logistics and transparency of the process, including the expectation that any proposed map or amendment would be made public once filed and that additional hearings would follow. Senator Blanco, whose district includes West Texas and the border region, said the area’s communities of interest should be kept together and warned against repeating the loss of representation that followed the last redistricting cycle. Senators Alvarado, Hinojosa, Miles, and others debated the value of virtual hearings versus in-person hearings, the number of people who had testified, and whether the committee could subpoena witnesses after the regional hearings ended. The chair said he was awaiting legal guidance and would consider a subpoena motion at a formal meeting the next day. A lengthy exchange also occurred over the tone of public testimony and the chair’s view that some comments directed at Republicans and the president had been offensive or historically inaccurate. Invited witnesses and public commenters largely opposed mid-decade redistricting and argued that any new map should reflect population growth, especially among Latino and other minority communities, and comply with the Voting Rights Act. Nina Perales of MALDEF said the hearings were not meaningful without a draft map and testified that Texas has a long history of discriminatory redistricting; senators questioned her about litigation, DOJ’s July 7 letter, and the 2021 congressional map. Tania Chavez Camacho, Luis Figueroa, and several El Paso residents emphasized that maps should preserve communities of interest, avoid cracking and packing, and be transparent and participatory. A smaller number of witnesses supported redistricting, including one El Paso resident who said the current districting leaves the area underrepresented and another who argued that some communities want to return to a map closer to the earlier District 16 configuration. Several witnesses also criticized the DOJ letter as inconsistent with the state’s position that the 2021 maps were drawn race-blind, while others said the current process was too rushed and lacked sufficient public input.

Transcript Highlights:

• When would you all feel is appropriate in this process for me to do our moment in black history?
• is a bill that we had last year, but it streamlines the vendor disclosure in the competitive bid process
• His high marks on his interest and aptitude exams won him admission into the aviation Cadet program.

Bills: SJR 2, SB 4, SJR 36, SJR 2, SB 4, SR 42, SR 74, SR 76, HCR 5, SB 710, SB 710

Keywords: SJR 2, Senate Joint Resolution 2, constitutional amendment, homestead exemption, property tax relief, school property tax, ad valorem tax, residence homestead, school district taxes, Texas Constitution Article VIII, public school finance, homeowner exemption, elderly exemption, senior tax relief, disabled exemption, tax year 2025, voter approval, November 2025 ballot, local government, Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:

• planning process planning process >> based<00:22:01.600> on<00:22:01.760> a<
• They are establish the process.
• of finding the most streamlined process of finding the most streamlined process we<01:05:01.760>
• states have been following this process states have been following this process for<01:23:03.440
• <01:28:15.440> with state plan and our audit process with state plan and our audit process

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: House Finance Division 3 met in work session and opened with procedural remarks from the chair about the committee’s schedule, deadlines, and recommendation options, noting the meeting was advisory and no votes were expected. The first bill discussed, House Bill 1569, concerned repealing the directive to sell the Anna Philbrook Center for Children property in Concord. Testimony from DHHS and New Hampshire Hospital focused on whether the property could be subdivided, the relationship to Senate Bill 572, the status of the city of Concord’s first right of refusal, and the practical effects of a sale. Witnesses said the $5 million sale estimate was a budget assumption, that moving staff and equipment would create some relocation costs, and that the center had required significant recent maintenance and renovation spending. Members also discussed the number of transitional housing beds at the site, the temporary nature of those beds, and whether the property should remain available given hospital workforce and service needs. The committee then turned to House Bill 661, which had been recommitted for further review after new information emerged. The chair summarized federal developments, including a December 2025 ACF letter and a related executive order, as well as a federal HHS press release about states diverting foster youths’ Social Security survivor benefits. Representative Walner explained that amendment 3055H had been drafted to move the bill forward in smaller steps, with a fiscal note requested on the amendment because the original bill was viewed as too large and expensive. Members discussed whether the committee had received copies of the amendment and whether federal guidance or funding had changed the policy landscape. The discussion also included broader questions about foster youth benefits and whether federal action would support state implementation. One member cited ACF language stating that only 11 states had enacted policies to stop interception of survivor benefits and that technical assistance would be available to the remaining states. The meeting remained in work-session mode throughout, with no votes taken and no final recommendations made during the portion provided. The chair indicated the committee could return to the bills later in the month.