Transcript Highlights:

• Floridians should be able to trust that technology is serving them, not deceiving them.
• Able to trust that technology is serving them, not deceiving them. That is the bill, Mr. President.
• We are so permissive with the way technology will aggressively attack our children in school.
• With the way technology will aggressively attack our children in schools, we have lulled parents into
• So our institutions that rely on technology can be able to adopt that technology in such a way that it's

Summary: The Senate convened with an opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then administered the oath of office to newly elected Senator Brian Nathan of District 14, with his family present. The chamber also read the governor’s amended special session proclamation, which expanded the call to include legislation on congressional redistricting and related litigation, artificial intelligence protections including an AI Bill of Rights and related public records exemptions, and medical freedom. The secretary then read the bills filed within the call: SB 2D (Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights), SB 4D (public records), SB 60 (medical freedom), and SB 8D (congressional districts).

Transcript Highlights:

• Working at the intersection of national security, spatial intelligence, and emerging technology focuses
• on turning complex challenges into practical capability for government and the technology focuses on
• SB 1284, moving violations and red-light appropriations — Transportation and Technology.
• SB 1304, mental illness prisoners diagnosis treatment — Appropriations, Transportation and Technology
• SB 1307, appropriation for DES emergency shelters — Appropriations, Transportation and Technology, and

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, confirmed a quorum, and approved the journal from January 21, 2026. Members then used points of personal privilege to recognize guests and groups in the gallery, including Chaplain Ron Lagata, an anti-human-trafficking proclamation for Not in Our State, an active-duty Air Force apprentice from Davis-Monthan, Space Force and aerospace guests, and Special Olympics Arizona. Senator Bolick’s proclamation emphasized Arizona’s commitment to combating human trafficking and invited members to an upcoming event. Senator Tothley delivered a somber statement about the death of eight-year-old Malika, Molly Boone, in his community and criticized delays in the Turquoise Alert system. He urged statewide changes so alerts go out more quickly and more broadly, and the Senate observed a moment of silence in her memory. The President Pro Tem expressed condolences and said he would continue working on solutions. The chamber then moved through the day’s legislative calendar, reading a long list of bills and resolutions for second reading and introducing several new bills for first reading and committee referral, including measures on election procedures, voting security, prison sentencing, water supply, unemployment benefits, health care, and appropriations. A nomination to the Arizona Board of Regents was also read by name only. Committee announcements were made for upcoming meetings, and the Senate adjourned on motion until Monday, January 26, 2026, at 1:15 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so we we have a very commendable technology zeal.
• Now today, obviously, the technology is not ready for prime time.
• That is what this technology will do. I strongly urge a no vote. Thank you.
• AB 33 does not ban automotive vehicle technology.
• This bill makes AV technology better.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• known as Cajito, and it uses technology, and this use of technology is a clear example of how voice,
• known as Cajito, and it uses technology, and this use of technology is a clear example of how voice,
• We need appropriate guardrails in place as this technology grows.
• It's happening. ...in place as this technology grows.
• Technology.

Summary: The committee heard a series of labor-related bills, with most measures focused on worker training, privacy, wages, and safety. AB 296 would require schools or districts to host apprenticeship fairs at least once a year, with flexibility on how they are run and whether programs outside the county can participate. Supporters said it would help connect students to skilled trades and address workforce shortages; school administrators opposed the bill as an unfunded mandate that could be impractical for elementary schools. The bill was later moved on call, with the committee noting it could not vote until quorum was established. AB 1221 and AB 1331 both addressed workplace surveillance. AB 1221 would restrict invasive monitoring tools, require notice to workers, limit the use and sharing of worker data, and require human review before discipline based on surveillance outputs. Labor groups supported the bill as a response to AI-driven monitoring, while business groups raised concerns about broad definitions, security cameras, investigations, and data-access provisions. AB 1331 focused more narrowly on privacy in off-duty and private spaces, limiting surveillance in places like restrooms, break areas, vehicles, and homes; hospitals and business groups opposed it as too broad and potentially disruptive to safety, cybersecurity, and facility monitoring. Both bills were advanced by committee vote. The committee also heard AB 1181, which would require firefighter turnout gear to be free of cancer-causing chemicals such as PFAS by 2027, and AB 1198, which would require prevailing wage rates on public works to reflect the wage in effect when the work is performed rather than when the project was first advertised. Firefighter representatives strongly supported AB 1181, while the chemical industry asked to continue working on scope and timelines. AB 1198 drew support from labor and contractor groups but opposition from local governments and housing groups concerned about mid-project cost increases; it was passed to Appropriations after a roll-call vote. Other measures approved included AB 1235 on skilled-and-trained workers for CSU construction, AB 1251 on ghost job postings, AB 552 on locating the Agricultural Labor Relations Board office outside Sacramento, AB 1110 on updating Cal/OSHA workplace posters, AB 1136 on expanding high road training partnerships, and AB 1234 on wage claim enforcement. AB 692, which would ban employer debt agreements that require workers to repay training or other costs if they leave a job, drew strong support from nurses and labor advocates and opposition from business and health care groups; it was also passed on a roll-call vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• . $15.1 million for technology improvements to streamline in-person services, including a secure document
• Colonel Goodson is here with me, the critical infrastructure technology. There's a lot in that.
• Technology is just, we should not be doing that. We can cut those times in half. That helps.
• So how do we fix that and there's technology? that now that will help us do that.
• That's a problem and there's technology to fix every one of those.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I would add that the history of technological advancement has been one of technological change in which
• 00:47:07.280> coming<00:47:07.599> out technological change in which coming out technological
• we've seen in past technological we've seen in past technological revolutions.<00:48:38.559>
• <00:57:44.000> So, technology in in all of these ways.
• So, technology in in all of these ways.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Very similar technology to what exists in the gigawatt-scale reactors.
• . and test out the feasibility of the technology.
• The advanced nuclear technologies being discussed...
• We've talked about the different technologies that are underway.
• We've talked about the different technologies that are underway.

Summary: The Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee met to review prior minutes and hear a series of presentations on advanced nuclear technology and state readiness. The committee approved the April 21, 2022 minutes. Nucleon’s William Bridge outlined the advanced nuclear landscape, distinguishing near-term light-water SMRs from more advanced Gen 4 reactors and microreactors, and emphasized that fuel supply, especially HALEU, remains a developing supply chain. He said light-water designs are the most deployable in the near term, while advanced reactors may be better suited for industrial heat applications and could face a 2- to 3-year delay from fuel availability. Representatives from NASEO described how other states are supporting advanced nuclear through task forces, roadmaps, pilot programs, financing tools, workforce and supply-chain efforts, and regional coordination. They highlighted the Advanced Nuclear First Mover Initiative and stressed that states are focusing early on emergency preparedness, community engagement, waste management, affordability, and consumer protections. They also noted that some states are creating nuclear-ready community programs and cost-recovery guardrails, while public utility commissions are examining long-term lifecycle costs and rate impacts. North Dakota agencies then outlined their potential roles. The Public Service Commission said it would likely be involved in public-interest review, siting, and rate regulation, but noted current statutes may not fully address long-term nuclear projects, co-location, or decommissioning. The Department of Environmental Quality said it would continue to regulate radioactive materials and likely support emergency planning, while fission reactor oversight remains federal. The Department of Emergency Services said it would serve as the lead off-site preparedness agency, needing a radiological emergency program, training, exercises, equipment, and possibly industry funding. The Department of Water Resources said North Dakota has sufficient surface water, especially from the Missouri River, but that water planning would be important; it did not recommend statutory or budget changes at this time. The committee recessed for lunch after these presentations, with no additional votes or actions taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• The rapid development of digital assets , blockchain technology and the broader crypto economy presents
• So this is not about us picking winners and losers among technologies or industries.
• We need to create a regulatory framework that encourages responsible development of this technology,
• So let's let's go back to some other technologies.
• This is open technology, Senator, at the end of the day.

Keywords: Digital Assets, Bitcoin, Stablecoins, Legislation, Bipartisan, Consumer Protection, Regulatory Framework, Financial Innovation, Testimony

Summary: The inaugural meeting of the Digital Assets Subcommittee brought a wave of excitement and anticipation regarding the future of digital assets, including Bitcoin and stablecoins. Chair Lummis expressed gratitude towards Senator Scott for establishing the subcommittee, indicating a commitment to promote responsible innovation while safeguarding consumers. Members discussed the necessity for a bipartisan legislative framework to regulate digital asset markets effectively while outlining the potential benefits such legislation could have on enhancing financial inclusion and streamlining payments. The meeting featured expert testimonies from key figures in the digital asset industry, highlighting the importance of creating clear regulatory guidance for digital assets to foster innovation without compromising consumer protections.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:35:15.839> to that allows this technology to that allows this technology to exist<00:35
• Say, but maybe the technology is there, and I'm not technologically savvy enough to be able to go there
• Say, but maybe the technology is there, and I'm not technologically savvy enough to be able to go there
• Say, but maybe the technology is there, and I'm not technologically savvy enough to be able to go there
• Say, but maybe the technology is there, and I'm not technologically savvy enough to be able to go there

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:22.639> that<00:14:22.800> you've other technologies that you've other technologies
• :43.440> the<00:14:43.680> blockchain technology, explain what the blockchain technology
• From a technology standpoint, the technology continues to improve at a very rapid pace.
• Um it's an amazing technology energy.
• Uh it has not this technology.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Hawaii State Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection held an informational briefing on digital assets, blockchain, and related regulatory developments. Chair Jarrett Keohoko said the committee was focusing on national and state policy issues around digital assets, while leaving the separate issue of Bitcoin kiosks and fraud to the House Consumer Protection Committee, which had already noticed a similar briefing. No public testimony was taken; the session was for informational updates and member questions. Representatives from the Aptos Foundation, including JC Yun and Michael Cheng, gave a detailed presentation on blockchain basics and Aptos’s technology. They described blockchain as a tamper-resistant digital ledger, explained proof-of-work and proof-of-stake systems, and argued that proof-of-stake networks are faster, cheaper, and more environmentally friendly. They also emphasized smart contracts and potential uses beyond speculation, such as car titles, college transcripts, collectibles, digital IDs, real estate, and other tokenized assets. The presenters highlighted Aptos’s Hawaii connections and said the technology could help local residents and businesses participate in the digital economy. They cited adoption statistics, including billions of transactions on Aptos, tokenized money market funds from major financial firms, micro-lending applications, decentralized cloud infrastructure, and the rapid growth of stablecoins. They acknowledged concerns about scams and consumer protection, but argued that the answer is stronger regulation and education rather than avoiding the technology altogether.

Transcript Highlights:

• Floridians should be able to trust that technology is serving them, not deceiving them.
• I think that it is, despite... ...able to trust that technology is serving them, not deceiving them.
• We are so permissive with the way technology will aggressively attack our children in school.
• We are so permissive with the way technology will aggressively attack our children in school.
• So our institutions that rely on technology can be able to adopt that technology in such a way that it's

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Committee on Appropriations and Technology reports that Senate Bill 1850 do pass.
• Senate Bill 1852 is reported do pass by the Committee on Appropriations and Technology.
• The Committee on Appropriations and Technology reports that Senate Bill 1854 do pass.
• House Bill 2311, relating to Title 18, chapter 8, linked information technology.
• House Bill 2311, relating to Title 18, chapter 8, linked information technology.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• How is the value of a bid assessed knowing that the technologies are changing every day?
• They're trying to identify new technology to improve things as a top as a as a as a hot topic.
• So it's coming from our it partners, our technology partners that are bringing it to our attention.
• As we're talking about emerging technologies, we have a newly formed a vision of transportation technology
• So in that case, I would recommend that a technology expert or a chief information officer.

Transcript Highlights:

• I know that sometimes state agencies do not do well with technology.
• , and PDF—you know, we're way out there on technology with those things, right?
• So we've utilized day-to-day technology.
• The technology? I can't work with the technology? I don't have the resources?
• And again, we have run our technology project.

Summary: The Economic Development Budget Subcommittee received a lengthy presentation from Kevin Guthrie, Executive Director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, on disaster costs, recovery operations, sheltering, and major capital projects. He reviewed the 2024 hurricane season impacts from Debby, Helene, and Milton, explaining how FEMA public assistance and state reimbursement work, how cost shares can shift from 75/25 to 90/10 after a federal threshold is reached, and how Florida uses prior storm data and inflation to estimate recovery costs. He also described the state’s faster reimbursement timelines, crediting legislative investments in technology and digital field documentation, and said the division is working to reduce disaster closeout timelines from decades to about seven years. Members asked about debris removal, FEMA de-obligations, local preparedness, and whether regional shelters or co-located emergency operations centers could be used more efficiently. Guthrie said debris assistance is complicated and should generally remain tied to local contracts and planning, though the state will help fiscally constrained communities when needed. He explained de-obligations as FEMA clawing back previously approved funds after later review, and said Florida’s FROC program is helping local governments reduce those risks through standardized documentation, procurement review, and training. He also urged more mandatory emergency-management training for local and state officials and cautioned against weakening the FEMA 50% rule for rebuilding damaged structures. Guthrie provided updates on the new central Florida warehouse in Auburndale and the new State Emergency Operations Center in Tallahassee. He said the warehouse will improve logistics, include cold and ultra-cold storage, and be run by a private vendor with virtual inventory tracking, while the new EOC is designed for Category 5 conditions and expanded partner capacity. He acknowledged budget pressures that reduced the size of the EOC project and said an additional IT request was needed because those costs were not originally included. The meeting ended with praise for FDEM’s work and no votes or formal actions beyond adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• They have technology, they have scouts everywhere, and our old traditional, uh, narcotic methods of,
• Technology is just, we, we, we should not be doing that. We can cut those times in half.
• Yes sir, and this technology or this improvement here, and, and there's a cost associated with it.
• And there's technology that, that, uh, now that will help us do that.
• And there's technology to fix every one of those.

Transcript Highlights:

• that a lot of these reactor technology companies are still...
• Very similar technology to what In water.
• And often they're based on the specific design of the technology.
• . and test out the feasibility of the technology.
• The advanced nuclear technologies being discussed...

Summary: The committee met to review advanced nuclear energy issues in North Dakota, beginning with approval of the April 21, 2022 minutes. Nucleon presented an overview of the advanced reactor landscape, distinguishing light-water SMRs, advanced Gen 4 reactors, and microreactors. The presentation emphasized that light-water SMRs are the most near-term deployable and use familiar low-enriched uranium fuel, while many Gen 4 designs may require high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALU), which is not yet supported by a mature U.S. supply chain. Nucleon also noted that advanced reactors are being developed primarily for industrial heat applications, while microreactors are niche, higher-cost systems for remote or mission-critical uses. Committee members asked about fuel availability, safety, recycling, and whether large reactors such as AP-1000s were evaluated; the presenter said fuel development is proceeding in parallel but remains a bottleneck, and that siting and grid capacity often make SMRs more practical than gigawatt-scale plants in North Dakota. Representatives from the National Association of State Energy Officials described how other states are supporting advanced nuclear through task forces, roadmaps, regional coordination, grants, tax incentives, workforce and supply-chain efforts, and pilot programs. They highlighted the Advanced Nuclear First Mover Initiative and said states are focusing on multi-state coordination, demand aggregation, regulatory coordination, waste management, workforce readiness, and community engagement. They also discussed affordability tools such as construction work in progress (CWIP), financing incentives, and consumer protections, citing examples from Kentucky, Texas, Virginia, Illinois, Missouri, Utah, Tennessee, and others. In response to questions, they explained that pilot programs often involve site-readiness and feasibility studies, and that the federal Nuclear Innovation Campus process is moving forward with multiple submissions while broader waste and recycling policy may require congressional action. The Public Service Commission said it would likely have a major role in any North Dakota nuclear project through certificate-of-public-convenience-and-necessity review, siting, and rate regulation, but noted gaps in current law for small reactors, co-located facilities, NRC coordination, and long-term site stewardship. The commissioner said the commission has no authority over a private, self-contained reactor not connected to the grid. The Department of Environmental Quality explained that the state regulates radioactive materials under its agreement-state authority, but NRC retains primacy over fission reactors; DEQ would likely assist with emergency planning and could have a larger role if fusion reactors emerge. The Department of Emergency Services said it would serve as the lead off-site preparedness agency, requiring a dedicated radiological emergency preparedness program, training, drills, public outreach, and likely additional funding and staffing, with industry expected to bear much of the cost. The Department of Water Resources said North Dakota’s water laws and prior-appropriation system are adequate for nuclear siting, that the Missouri River is the best likely source, and that no statutory or budget changes are currently needed from a water perspective. The committee recessed for lunch after these agency presentations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Just out of curiosity. the technology, but I don't I can't the technology, but I don't I can't think<
• <00:53:16.160> I whatever this technology is using. I whatever this technology is using.
• > could a technology like this could a technology like this could theoretically<00:56:07.440><
• It's not my core technology.
• technologically? technologically?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with roll call and approval of the prior meeting minutes, which passed unanimously. Members then introduced the day’s presentations, including one on the Canton network and another on tokenizing real-world assets, with a focus on how blockchain systems can support regulated financial institutions and asset tokenization. Julie, the director of policy and government affairs at Digital Asset, presented on the Canton network, describing it as a privacy-enabled public blockchain designed for regulated finance. She said tokenization should preserve the same legal and economic rights as the underlying asset, and argued that blockchain-based books and records can shorten settlement times, improve 24/7 trading, and reduce friction in capital markets. She identified three main barriers to institutional adoption of public blockchains: lack of privacy, limited throughput/scalability, and lack of control for compliance purposes such as freezing assets, pausing transactions, and meeting AML/sanctions obligations. She explained Canton’s structure as a public, permissionless network with application-level privacy controls, a global synchronizer, and super validators chosen by vote. She also highlighted current ecosystem participants and use cases, including Broadridge, Circle, and the DTCC’s planned tokenization of U.S. Treasuries on the network. Members and online participants asked about the relationship between tokenized assets and the Clarity Act, tokenized deposits, safeguards for faster settlement, and whether the platform could be used for municipal or property records. Julie said Digital Asset was not taking a position on rewards, but supported clearer statutory definitions because tokenized securities should carry the same rights as the underlying assets and investors need to know whether a token is a true tokenized security or a synthetic/reference token. She said the company is agnostic on whether the cash leg is stablecoins or tokenized deposits, though it expects both to develop. In response to concerns about rapid settlement, she pointed to institution-level permissions and SEC disclosure expectations as safeguards. She also said the technology could be used for other records, including potentially property-related records, if those assets can be tokenized.

Transcript Highlights:

• assisted technologies in New Hampshire. assisted technologies in New Hampshire.
• So we changed that everywhere in the bill to read assistive technology instead of a technology-first.
• On line J, you'll see one representative from an assistive technology or medical technology business
• On line J, you'll see one representative from an assistive technology or medical technology business
• On line J, you'll see one representative from an assistive technology or medical technology business

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A study by DOT that'll review the emerging technologies in railway crossing safety.
• I have a question just as we talk about this technology; we've been seeing these coolers.
• I think it even becomes riskier for a bicyclist with some new technology.
• We spent two days in Germany looking at their wind technology and some of their other advanced technologies
• It's kind of—it's old technology. Why not embrace new technology?

Transcript Highlights:

• It is a master database, and then it has layers of technology on top.
• It is a combination of the system, the underlying database, and technology.
• Technology is layered on top of it. The underlying database is a maintained database.
• **ISF** is an IT technology firm that, in my experience, primarily does IT consulting. Okay.
• So, they use the same technology for blind services as well.