Transcript Highlights:

• This will probably be placed in HB2 and probably be split up a little bit as we get HB2 wrapped up and
• This will probably be placed in HB2 and probably be split up a little bit as we get HB2 wrapped up and
• This will probably be placed in HB2 and probably be split up a little bit as we get HB2 wrapped up and
• This will probably be placed in HB2 and probably be split up a little bit as we get HB2 wrapped up and
• This will probably be placed in HB2 and probably be split up a little bit as we get HB2 wrapped up and

Bills: SB20, SB21, SB166, SB177, SB181, SB189, SM6

Keywords: prior authorization, pharmacy benefits manager, PBM, health insurer, prescription drugs, step therapy, formulary, auto-adjudication, electronic portal, appeals, medical necessity, serious mental illness, mental health, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, substance use disorder, addiction treatment, cancer, autoimmune disorder

Transcript Highlights:

• State oversight of the cannabis industry was initially split between three programs.
• When the department was formed, there was a 65-35 percentage split of provisionals to annuals. 8,360
• This is just the licensed market going back to 2020, split between adult-use or recreational and medicinal
• This is just the licensed market going back to 2020, split between the adult use or recreational and
• On the criminal side, the way that the fines worked, that my clients paid, were equally split amongst

Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on the Department of Cannabis Control’s report on the condition and health of California’s cannabis industry. Department staff reviewed the evolution of state cannabis law, the creation of the current regulatory framework, licensing and compliance efforts, and enforcement against illicit cannabis and hemp-derived intoxicating cannabinoids. The department said the licensed market has grown in production and retail units sold, while active licenses and retail sales value have declined, and that the illicit market remains a major competitive factor. The department also highlighted consumer education efforts, product testing and recalls, and coordination through the state enforcement task force and other agencies. The department’s economist said the data show continued growth in licensed production and a rising share of consumption through the licensed market, but falling wholesale and retail prices have reduced overall industry value. He identified major headwinds as taxes and fees, illicit-market competition, local prohibitions that limit retail access, regulatory costs, and broader business pressures, while noting opportunities in product innovation and possible hemp-market changes. Committee members pressed the department on enforcement, public health concerns, equity ownership and employment, delays in grant administration, pesticide testing, and whether the legal market is truly viable for small businesses and farmers. Several members argued that stronger enforcement and lower costs are needed, while one member raised concerns about cannabis-related health harms and said the hearing focused too narrowly on supply-side issues. Public commenters from industry groups and advocacy organizations largely echoed concerns about high taxes, regulatory burdens, limited retail access, and the size of the illicit market. Many urged the Legislature not to let the excise tax rise from 15% to 19% and called for tax relief, compliance reform, more enforcement, and broader retail access. Some speakers said the report was too optimistic and did not reflect business failures, debt, and closures, while others emphasized the need to protect small farmers, address wildfire insurance, and support equity businesses. No votes or formal actions were taken; the hearing was informational only.

Transcript Highlights:

• This one was a split vote.
• Yesterday we did vote on what Mr. just mentioned there, which is we moved, and I know it was a split
• vote well I was actually one was a split vote well I was actually referring<00:52:32.400> to<
• vote we moved know was a for was a split vote we moved a<00:55:05.920> number<00:55:06.200>
• <01:03:08.359> of accounting unit you'll see the split of accounting unit you'll see the split

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard Representative Sweeney present and defend the budget amendment legalizing video lottery terminals (VLTs) and setting a 30% tax rate, with 65% of the tax going to the state and 35% to charities. He argued the lower rate was needed to encourage operators of historic horse racing (HHR) machines to convert to VLTs, saying the higher 45% rate would discourage adoption. He walked through revenue projections for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, estimating significant increases in state and charity revenue as machines transition over time, and said the amendment was designed to expand charitable gaming revenue overall. Several members questioned the assumptions behind his projections and the basis for his analysis, including why his independent research differed from the governor’s and Lottery Commission’s estimates. Sweeney said his figures were based on research into other states and conversations over many years, and he maintained that a 45% tax would likely result in no VLT adoption. Members also debated whether the transition costs for operators would be quickly recouped and whether the state’s share should be larger. One member emphasized that the committee was effectively choosing between a lower operator share and a higher state share, while Sweeney argued the 30% structure would produce revenue for everyone. The committee then moved to other revenue items on the tracking sheet. It voted 7-0 to accept the Lottery Commission’s revised base revenue estimates. Members also discussed an amendment to repeal the local option requirement for Kino games, which would expand Kino availability and was estimated to generate additional lottery profit in fiscal years 2026 and 2027. That amendment drew opposition from members who said local control was an important part of the original Kino policy and that removing it would override municipal decisions. The committee also noted that the VLT/HHR revenue item had already been adopted and was being revisited only to confirm the associated revenue estimates.

Transcript Highlights:

• committee, in addition to working up the operating budget, the first vote, if that fails, it also has a sentence
• I mean, that's kind of splitting the baby.
• I mean that's<01:35:41.600> kind<01:35:41.760> of<01:35:42.000> splitting<01:35:
• <01:35:43.040> But that's kind of splitting the baby.
• But that's kind of splitting the baby.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for what kind of programs are going to be going for this $9 million, you are going to see an even split
• So, you know, yes, sometimes it isn't always a 50/50 split, but the needs are going to be different,
• for what kind of programs are going to be going for this $9 million, you are going to see an even split
• So, you know, yes, sometimes it isn't always a 50/50 split, but the needs are going to be different,
• So, you know, yes, sometimes it isn't always a 50/50 split, but the needs are going to be different,

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• If we weren't able to make that that we don't have the ability to split the payment.
• My second question is splitting the payments where you had mentioned that you just don't have the capability
• What is the reason you can't split that payment? You're recognized. >> Thank you. Madam Chair.
• This bridge, it might be able to explain what the fefp can and can't do and whether it can be split are
• It is very difficult but legally and also I think I was some challenges to split and fefp run fte payment

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, where I come from, um, sometimes those costs are split.
• And um, sometimes those costs are split.
• c><00:20:33.760> those<00:20:34.080> costs<00:20:34.320> are<00:20:34.559> split
• <00:20:35.039> And um, sometimes those costs are split.
• And um, sometimes those costs are split.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: House File 40, authored by Representative Burkel, was heard and laid over. The bill would remove the statutory requirement that farmed deer/elk facilities maintain a physical barrier preventing contact with wild deer, and it would also strike language allowing revocation of registration and seizure/destruction of animals for fencing or escape violations. Burkel argued the current law is unfair to deer farmers, treats them differently than other livestock producers, and amounts to a regulatory taking of a legal agricultural enterprise. Supporters from the Minnesota Elk Breeders Association and Minnesota Deer Farmers Association said the 2023 secondary-fence requirement is expensive, difficult to implement on long-established properties, and has pushed some breeders out of the industry. They described costs ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars, said the DNR’s guidance is case-by-case and unclear, and argued that the penalty structure is too harsh for what they view as minor or unavoidable escape incidents. One testifier said the industry is being driven out of business and that the state should help pay for the fencing if it remains required. The DNR opposed the bill. Its enforcement representative said the physical-contact barrier is intended to reduce the risk of chronic wasting disease transmission and that removing penalties would leave little incentive for compliance. He said the agency continues to work with the roughly 10 noncompliant whitetail farms and that the DNR provides case-by-case review because farm topography varies. In committee questions, members discussed whether wild deer commonly travel along fence lines, whether ear-tagged deer have been found, and whether there is a standard approved fence design; the DNR said there is no single standard fence, only suggestions and review. Representative Burkel closed by reiterating his support for the bill and the committee then laid it over.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, Medical Assistance is split between the two committees.
• Uh, Medical Assistance is split between the two committees.
• Uh, Medical Assistance is split between the two committees.
• Uh, Medical Assistance is split between the two committees.
• Uh, Medical Assistance is split between the two committees.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll split the money with you if you don't go in."
• He was just sentenced to life in prison.
• I'll split the because I'm a Jixer.
• But just sentenced to life in prison.
• life sentence for that crime. So, Mr. life sentence for that crime. So, Mr.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, May 14, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Hypothetically, 40 sessions of X and they split it? Or because it's educationally based?
• And they split it, or because it's educationally based?
• Hypothetically, 40 sessions of X and they split it? Or because it's educationally based?
• and they split it or because it's educationally based because it's educationally based you're absolutely

Keywords: 962, all

Summary: The meeting began with approval of the May minutes and then moved into administrative updates on several 2025 legislative workstreams. Staff reported progress on two marketing efforts tied to the youth mental health crisis: one focused on increasing awareness and use of urgent crisis centers, and another broader crisis-continuum campaign led by United Way. Both projects are refining materials based on working-group feedback and aim to have materials ready before the start of the school year. Updates were also given on the UCC private insurance review and the crisis continuum review, both of which are gathering data and reconvening working groups over the summer. The main discussion centered on a Civic Solutions Group update on Medicaid school billing. The contractor explained that the project is examining why Connecticut schools are not billing for behavioral health and related services, with the goal of maximizing federal reimbursement. Members clarified that the study is about schools billing for services, not private providers billing in schools. Questions focused on whether Medicaid has caps or authorization issues when students receive services both in school and in the community, and whether recent federal or state changes affect billing. The contractor said the work is still in data collection and analysis, and that some issues, such as reauthorization procedures, were outside his scope. Participants also raised concerns about perceived barriers, fee-for-service limitations, and the need to distinguish school-based billing from provider billing. A second major presentation came from Disability Rights Connecticut on a separate legislative study concerning behavioral health issues affecting students receiving special education. The subgroup is examining the feasibility and impact of requiring evidence-based interventions, especially for challenging behaviors that can lead to restraint and seclusion, and is also looking at monitoring and random audits of restraint and seclusion practices. The team described its project plan, including literature reviews, interviews, focus groups, surveys, and data requests from the State Department of Education and other stakeholders. Members emphasized that the work is aimed primarily at private providers under the statute, but may have broader relevance. Questions from the group focused on whether the study would include public schools, how evidence-based practices apply to students with intellectual disabilities and autism, and whether caregivers or parents would be interviewed; the presenters said caregiver input is not currently part of the charge. The meeting ended with reminders about the July 15 meeting, which will include a Solnit briefing, and a note that August TCB meetings will not be held, though a workshop on the Connecticut Children’s Behavioral Health Provider Survey is being planned for late July or early August.

Transcript Highlights:

• Essentially the total of 15, 50 billion dollars is split into 2 tranches of money or pots of money.
• If you well tranche one as as was referred to as a baseline funding and which is 25 million dollars split
• One Israeli distribute evenly a problem and states all if all states apply trounced, who has split in
• So Karen Telehealth is really a split between initiative factors and state policy actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• E-tabs surpassed paper pull tabs in 2023, but still it's just shy of a 50/50 split.
• E-tabs surpassed paper pull tabs in 2023, but still it's just shy of a 50/50 split.
• it's about 55% I'd say 50/50 split it's about 55% I'd say ballparking<00:07:30.280> it's<00:07
• about<00:07:35.840> a<00:07:36.000> 55<00:07:36.520> 45<00:07:37.000> split
• <00:07:37.319> between<00:07:37.919> paper to me about a 55 45 split between paper

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 169, which would change the tax structure for charitable gambling. Representative Robbins offered and the committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, described as a technical correction to ensure sports-themed tip boards are not inadvertently taxed under the bill. Robbins then presented the bill as a way to replace the current tiered combined net receipts tax on charitable gambling with a flat 5% rate, arguing charities were being overtaxed and that prior promises of relief had not been fully delivered. Chair Stevenson pushed back on several of Robbins’ factual claims, correcting the record on the status of E-pull tabs, the share of charitable gambling revenue they represent, and the amount of tax relief already enacted in 2023 and 2024. He said E-tabs were not eliminated, that the revenue split between paper pull tabs and E-tabs is closer to 45/55, and that charities had already received a $15 million tax cut plus savings from reduced developer fees. Robbins responded that the changes still significantly reduced revenue and that the bill was intended as a middle-ground approach. Testimony largely came from charitable gambling and veterans groups in support of the bill. Rachel Jenner of Allied Charities of Minnesota said nearly 1,000 charities depend on charitable gambling, cited high taxes and fees, and said many organizations were seeing revenue declines after the new E-pull tab rules took effect. Dr. Christy Jano of the American Legion Department of Minnesota said charitable gambling funds support veterans, youth, and community programs, and that a flat 5% tax would help posts continue those efforts. Members asked about the size of the revenue drops and how much gambling proceeds go to overhead and operating costs; Jenner said the losses varied by organization and that it was too early to know the long-term effect, while Jano said some expenses are used for property taxes and building upkeep. The committee then moved on to additional testimony, including Tim Angstrom, but no final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• page seven, line two, would be rulemaking authority for the Industrial Sighting Council, and then a split
• The<00:31:54.320> next<00:31:54.559> sentence<00:31:54.960> states,<00:31:55.679
• > "The<00:31:56.080> permit The next sentence states, "The permit The next sentence states
• is rulemaking authority and then a split is rulemaking authority and then a split effective<00:38
• It splits these problems into two different categories.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We had any number of bills that came out of the committee with no recommendation because we were split
• We had any number of bills that came out of the committee with no recommendation because we were split
• He said the first sentence of the bill says, “Whereas the practice of univariate analysis for complex
• /c><05:16:40.480> first wording in the bill um the first wording in the bill um the first sentence
• of the bill is whereas the sentence of the bill is whereas the practice<05:16:43.480> of practice

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee met for its first meeting of the new session with opening remarks, member introductions, and a discussion of committee logistics. Members described their backgrounds and priorities, including criminal justice, right-to-know and privacy issues, domestic violence, death-with-dignity legislation, abortion, firearms, landlord-tenant policy, housing, and technology/privacy concerns. The chair noted there were already 34 bills assigned to the committee and expected more, and said the committee would likely continue to have a heavy workload this session. The chair also outlined how the committee would operate: meetings would generally be on Wednesdays, with possible Mondays as needed; hearings would not require a quorum, but executive sessions would; and members were asked to provide updated phone numbers and email addresses, especially cell numbers. He explained that the committee would continue its practice of seating members in a mixed partisan arrangement to encourage communication, and that the new clerk had joined the committee. A significant portion of the meeting focused on procedures for executive sessions and meeting times. The chair said the committee would follow the traditional rule allowing executive sessions on bills heard that day if proper notice was given, but he would avoid taking up controversial matters without full attendance. Members then discussed whether meetings should start at 9, 9:30, or 10 a.m., with concerns raised about long commutes, evening obligations, and winter driving after dark. No formal vote was taken in the portion provided, but the chair indicated he would try to accommodate the committee’s preference while balancing the workload.

Transcript Highlights:

• And why do you have the federal versus state election split seems like an administrative nightmare.
• And then why would you put in a split between federal elections and state and local elections.
• I just guess the heart of my question is why intentionally put a federal and state split in your bill

Bills: HB2938, HB2939, HB3306, HB3722, HB4113, HB4123

Keywords: elections, national elections, state elections, voter intent, election reform, absentee voting, electronic communication, facsimile device, voting materials, military voters, campaign finance, ethics, political contributions, candidate committee, Oklahoma legislation, voter registration, political party affiliation, Independent designation, Oklahoma, voter eligibility

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> It's, you know, it's a 75/25 split there.
• So that's that pull down. >> It's, you know, it's a 75/25 split there.
• know<00:14:54.160> it's<00:14:54.320> a<00:14:54.560> 7525<00:14:55.600> split
• >> It's you know it's a 7525 split there.
• >> It's you know it's a 7525 split there.

Keywords: Appropriations - Room 216, 15 January, 2026; 9:30 AM, 925, all

Summary: The committee heard an update from the Mississippi National Guard leadership on deployments, operations, and the Guard’s budget request. The general described ongoing missions involving Mississippi units at the southern border, the National Capital Region, and Operation Safe and Beautiful, as well as the Guard’s role in Operation Midnight Hammer through the Meridian refueling unit. He also noted continued training of international partners at Camp Shelby and emphasized the Guard’s statewide, national, and global reach. The budget presentation focused on a modest increase over the prior year, including funding for state employees and the Youth Challenge Academy, the Mississippi Armed Forces Museum, the state education assistance program, readiness center maintenance for armories, and an increase in AC escalation authority from $164 million to $225 million to allow spending of federal funds on approved projects. The general said federal investment in Mississippi National Guard activities totaled $784 million in FY25, with $384 million for payroll, and explained that most permanent positions are federally reimbursed. Members discussed the state education assistance program, which the general said has helped stop recruiting losses to neighboring states by making Mississippi more competitive on tuition benefits. He said the program especially helps retain midcareer noncommissioned officers and supports younger service members who may lack health coverage when called to state active duty. Senators also asked about Camp Shelby Youth Challenge facilities and armory projects; the general reported that recent appropriations have improved the campus, that the program remains among the top three nationally, and that armory work is moving forward in Amory, Southaven, Corinth, and Carthage. No votes were taken, and the meeting ended with expressions of appreciation and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• So you're splitting that middle and high school across three separate...
• Next, I wanted to just talk a little bit about the 50% increase split... Okay.
• Next, I wanted to just talk a little bit about the 50% increase split, or interest split.
• I promise we would have split it out Promise we would have split it out equitably among all of our employees

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• want to own or carry weapons, it is actually scarier for them because that time frame means that that split
• second between when something is concealed and when it is brought out into the open, that split second
• want to own or carry weapons, it is actually scarier for them because that time frame means that that split
• second between when something is concealed and when it is brought out into the open, that split second
• second between when something is concealed and when it is brought out into the open, that split second

Keywords: HB 312 continued 00:00 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 25:16 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 27:27 Recess for ConC and Rules Meeting 28:33 ConC/Rules Report 33:45 Adjournment 35:21, 958, all

Summary: The House took up House Bill 312, which would expand concealed carry rights to 18- to 20-year-olds. Debate focused heavily on gun violence, public safety, constitutional rights, and whether the bill would make schools, parks, and other public places less safe. Opponents argued that young people are not ready for the responsibility, cited recent shootings and gun deaths in their districts, and said families had not asked for this bill. Supporters said 18- to 20-year-olds already may possess firearms, that concealed carry is safer than open carry for law-abiding adults, and that the bill includes training and background-check provisions. Several members also discussed differences between rural and urban gun culture and whether crime trends were related to constitutional carry laws. During floor discussion, members exchanged questions about crime rates since constitutional carry was enacted, with a sponsor responding that crime had decreased in the Commonwealth. Other members raised concerns about suicide, mental health, and the impact on students and women, while supporters emphasized self-defense and constitutional rights. After debate, the House voted on HB 312 and passed it 73-17. The bill was then clinched. After HB 312, the House handled routine business. Members moved House Resolutions 30, 33, and 7 from committee to the floor, and several committee schedule announcements were made, including possible changes due to weather. The Committee on Committees reported referrals for a number of bills to standing committees, and the Rules Committee posted House Bills 134 and 306 for the regular orders on Monday, January 26, 2026. The House then adjourned until 4:00 p.m. Monday, January 26, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• And most of the universities in the country will split the difference when somebody makes a discovery
• <00:03:59.600> the<00:03:59.720> difference will split the difference will split the
• Have you had conversations with Mohamed Puri, and what is his reaction to this 15/85 split? Mr.
• Have you had conversations with Mohamed Puri, and what is his reaction to this 15/85 split? Mr.
• Have you had conversations with Mohamed Puri, and what is his reaction to this 15/85 split? Mr.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Please hold January 8th open until we see what the split for retained bills is between the consent and
• Please hold January 8th open until we see what the split for retained bills is between the consent and
• Please hold January 8th open until we see what the split for retained bills is between the consent and
• Please hold January 8th open until we see what the split for retained bills is between the consent and
• <00:38:19.760> for open until we see what the split for open until we see what the split for

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Executive Departments and Administration Committee met in executive session on November 5, 2025, to consider House Bills 244, 610, and 727, and Senate Bills 94 and 193. On HB 244, which recodifies municipal enforcement of the building and fire code, the committee adopted amendment 2025-2952H by a 16-0 vote, then voted 16-0 to report the bill ought to pass as amended and placed it on the consent calendar. The discussion emphasized that the bill reorganizes building code statutes into a single chapter and was the product of substantial subcommittee work. On HB 610, concerning repeal of the Office of the Consumer Advocate, the committee adopted amendment 2025-3076H by a 16-0 vote. The amendment narrowed the office’s charge to residential utility customers, added duties for the Residential Ratepayer Advisory Board, allowed a two-thirds board recommendation to remove a consumer advocate for failing to perform duties, and broadened the qualifications pool for the position while retaining attorney eligibility. The current consumer advocate, Donald Crease, testified that he still preferred the existing statute but appreciated the committee’s effort to preserve a vigilant, independent ratepayer voice; members generally described the amendment as a more focused, less drastic approach. The committee then voted 16-0 to report HB 610 ought to pass as amended and placed it on consent. For HB 727, relating to the New Hampshire retirement system, the committee voted to inexpediently legislate by a 15-0 vote, with one member recused, explaining that the bill’s subject matter had already been addressed in House Bill 2 and signed by the governor. The bill was also placed on the consent calendar. On Senate Bill 94, prohibiting municipal amendments to the state building code, the committee heard extensive explanation from Mr. Sherman about a substitute amendment, 2025-2972H, which would preserve the prohibition on technical municipal amendments and avoid an unintended trigger that could reopen technical amendments across the code if the state falls behind on model code updates. The committee adopted the amendment 15-1 and then moved toward an ought to pass as amended recommendation; the transcript cuts off before the final disposition on SB 94 is fully completed. Senate Bill 193 was listed at the start of the meeting, but no discussion of it appears in the provided transcript.