Video & Transcript : 'patient preferences' :

Page 57 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Feb 26th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • I would prefer not to list any because they may or may not have changed their practices.
  • So, if a physician is having a private conversation with their patient, who is someone liable to report
  • I, as a medical professional, assuming I were a doctor, could not even have a conversation with a patient
  • everything to do with instituting a medical gag on what medical professionals can talk about with their patients
DE
Transcript Highlights:
  • Providers already routinely transition patients to biosimilars in clinical practice.
  • But what if the patient doesn't want to?
  • So if the patient does not want to change over, then...
  • I can't say for sure that that patient would be required to try something else.
  • On average, a patient would go through one, at the most usually two biologics.
Summary: The committee heard several bills, but much of the meeting focused on House Bill 306, which would require disclosure when a consumer is interacting with a chatbot rather than a human. Sponsor Senator Townsend described it as a consumer protection measure and said the bill is meant to keep pace with rapidly changing AI technology. Committee members and witnesses raised concerns about the bill’s enforcement structure, especially private rights of action and penalties that could apply even without actual consumer harm. The Department of Justice said the bill would apply where the conduct has a Delaware nexus, and that the disclosure requirement is the key consumer protection. Industry witnesses and chambers of commerce opposed the bill as drafted, arguing it would create broad compliance burdens and expose businesses to excessive litigation risk without a harm requirement or clearer safe harbor language. Earlier in the meeting, the committee discussed House Bill 429, which would update Delaware’s step therapy exception process to include biosimilars and interchangeable biologics. Senator Poore and supporters from Highmark and the Department of Insurance said the bill would modernize insurance law, improve access to effective treatments, and reduce costs; they cited national savings from biosimilars and said the bill has agency support. Members asked about Delaware-specific savings, patient switching, and how the process would work, but no vote was taken during the discussion. The committee also heard House Bill 310, which would exclude large data centers from Blue Collar Jobs Act tax credits; the sponsor said the bill is intended to ensure large energy users contribute more to state and local revenues, while supporters and opponents debated competitiveness and community impacts. House Bill 406, on allowing insureds to choose their auto repair shop, and Senate Bill 347, a cleanup bill related to medical debt collection and personal property levies, were also presented without opposition in the hearing. House Bill 253, concerning who may receive letters testamentary or of administration, was described as a cleanup to align statute with existing practice. The committee approved the meeting minutes, but the transcript does not show final votes on the bills discussed.
FL

Florida 2026 4th Special Session

February 11, 2026 - 08:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • basic issue, it appears, and based on the white paper you shared with us, you cited millions of patients
  • It's up to a doctor to educate a patient. And so I'm not entirely clear I understood the question.
  • enough that we're willing to take on anything that comes out of it that's harmful debilitating to a patient
  • It prohibits public employers and their employees or contractors from requiring the use of preferred
  • across who were fired from their jobs because of discriminatory mandates all across the state on preferred
Summary: The subcommittee first took up HB 339, which would create liability for vaccine manufacturers that advertise in Florida and require them to stand behind their products if consumers are harmed. The sponsor argued the bill is meant to restore trust in vaccines, improve informed consent, and address inadequate federal vaccine-injury compensation systems; he said he was open to amendments and noted the bill was modeled on Texas law. Opponents, including a former vaccine-court official, a Florida Justice Reform Institute representative, and a physician, argued the bill is preempted by federal law, raises First Amendment concerns, is vague, and is unnecessary because existing federal compensation programs already provide a remedy. After an amendment delaying the effective date by three months was adopted, the committee heard extensive public testimony, mostly opposed, and then approved HB 339 as amended by a 12-4 vote. The committee then began HB 1001, a strike-all on official actions of local governments that would bar counties and municipalities from official DEI-related actions and spending, define DEI and related terms, add enforcement provisions, and include broad exceptions for holidays, observances, and certain content-neutral civic events. The sponsor said the measure is intended to curb what he described as divisive and wasteful DEI activity in local government while preserving compliance with anti-discrimination laws and other listed exceptions. Members questioned the lack of definitions for terms like “preferential treatment” and the bill’s possible effects on local festivals, language-access services, Pride events, memorials, and community programs; the sponsor said some concerns were addressed by exceptions and that he was open to further changes. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed, with speakers warning of overbreadth, preemption, frivolous lawsuits, harm to local autonomy, and impacts on marginalized communities, while supporters said the bill would restore neutrality, accountability, and merit-based governance. The amendment to HB 1001 was adopted, and the committee continued hearing testimony and debate on the bill as amended.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Public Health Jun 21st, 2026 at 09:00 am

Joint Committee on Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • and also being a patient myself.
  • So patients who are 16 do not need parental consent; patients who are 15 do.
  • Patients, particularly elderly patients, may have died due to isolation, deaths of despair.
  • My patient... My patient was completely devastated.
  • I have had patients...
Summary: The committee opened by explaining hearing procedures and time limits, then heard testimony on House 2499, a bill to create a public awareness campaign on menopause and related midlife health issues. Supporters, including a nurse, the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women, and other advocates, said menopause is widely misunderstood by patients and providers, leading to delayed care, unnecessary suffering, workplace impacts, and inequities in women’s health. Several speakers shared personal experiences with symptoms being dismissed or misdiagnosed and urged the committee to advance the bill. The committee then took testimony on a package of endometriosis bills, including House 2527 and Senate 1564, calling for a task force and broader awareness efforts. Patients, a physician, and advocates described long diagnostic delays, severe pain, infertility, medical gaslighting, and limited access to specialists and effective treatment. They argued for more research, provider education, and a coordinated state strategy, and several asked for favorable reports. The chair also noted the hearing was running behind and extended time to allow more testimony. Later, the committee heard Senate 1579, which would eliminate parental consent and judicial bypass requirements for abortion access for minors under 16. Planned Parenthood representatives, physicians, legal advocates, and students argued the current law creates unnecessary delays and harms vulnerable youth, especially those in unsafe homes or foster care, while supporters said minors can already consent to other reproductive health care. A pro-life witness opposed the bill and emphasized parental involvement and support services. The committee also heard House 2403 and Senate 1560, which would create a Human Service Transportation Consumer Advisory Board; disability advocates and riders described past safety problems and current service gaps, and supported the board as a low-cost way to improve accountability, rider input, and reliability. No votes or final actions were taken in the excerpt.
NM
Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, according to the MCOs, the higher cost per patient is what's driving that number. Mr.
  • And this is when transfer patients—there have been a lot of, you know, airplane transfers.
  • And it would be a win-win, because, you know, these patients are left with this bill.
  • patients where there shouldn't be.
  • And I think transport also works for patients. I mean, it's a win-win.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 22nd, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • , situation, health, personal preferences, interests, reliability, behavior, location, or movements.
  • Patient-identifying information for the purposes of 42 CFR part two.
  • The Federal Healthcare Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the Patient Safety Work Act of 2005 pertain
  • to patient safety work products for the purposes of the Federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
  • features, discounts, or club card program, the controller shall comply with the consumer's opt-out preference
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Ways and Means Mar 31st, 2026

Joint Committee on Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please let me share a story of one of my patients; I shall call her Lily.
  • Thank you for your attention and commitment to Boston's most vulnerable patients.
  • Over the past six months, we've been analyzing patient data and found that the health needs of our patient
  • I wanted to emphasize the need for our patients to have continuous care.
  • Athanasopoulos, whatever you prefer. No, welcome. Fourteen letters, six syllables.
Summary: The hearing focused heavily on the FY27 state budget and related funding priorities across health care, housing, education, disability services, and public higher education. Multiple witnesses urged restoration or increases in funding for MassHealth Community Partners and complex care management for homeless and medically complex patients, the DMH rental subsidy program, the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program, the DeafBlind Community Access Network, and the Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Testimony also highlighted the need for fair pay and wage equity for community college faculty and staff, as well as support for early childhood vouchers, cash assistance, and nutrition education programs affected by federal cuts. Several witnesses described how funding gaps affect real people: nurses and care managers said patients with homelessness and severe medical needs lose coordinated care, leading to missed treatment and hospitalizations; early childhood educators said long voucher waitlists leave families without child care; community college staff said low salaries and increased workloads from MassEducate leave workers struggling to afford housing and basic expenses; and housing advocates said cuts to rental subsidies and vouchers push vulnerable people toward shelters or more expensive crisis systems. DeafBlind advocates asked for restored funding, more interpreter access, and better provider support, while a witness also supported hearing-aid coverage legislation. Education funding was another major theme. Boston, Framingham, Triton, and other districts described Chapter 70 and other formula-driven aid as failing to keep up with inflation and actual costs, forcing layoffs, program cuts, and local overrides. Speakers also called for fully funded charter reimbursements, special education circuit breaker funding, transportation aid, school building investments, and relief tied to enrollment declines driven by federal immigration enforcement. Committee members asked several clarifying questions about program status, funding mechanics, and the meaning of terms like “death by housing,” but no votes or formal actions were taken in the transcript.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • I happen to be a home base for a lot of high-acuity patients in the Medicare managed care program.
  • individuals call to find out how... ...find out and have individuals call to find out how many Medicaid patients
  • What we are seeing is that they may be listed on the network, but they only take one patient a week.
  • secret-shopper approach, we want to make sure that if a plan is identifying a provider as accepting new patients
  • this money goes to the proper places because we do have an affordability crisis here, and I would prefer
Summary: The Legislative Budget Commission met to consider 21 budget amendments, beginning with the Department of Education’s request for $14.751 million in federal grant authority for the Preschool Development Grant. Members asked whether any funds would support VPK or provider payments; the department said the money is for birth-to-kindergarten early learning work, including IT modernization, workforce credentialing, training, and streamlining director certification. The amendment was adopted without objection. The commission then approved amendments for the Department of Veterans Affairs to shift $2.2 million within its trust fund to cover higher nursing home occupancy and reduce staffing agency use, and for the Department of Health to realign about $9.1 million for disability determinations amid a backlog of roughly 140,000 cases. The Agency for Health Care Administration presented multiple Medicaid-related amendments, including $766 million for indirect medical education, $1.9 million for managed care network adequacy audits, $209 million for the Rural Health Transformation Program, and several large supplemental payment programs for KidCare, hospitals, physicians, cancer hospitals, nursing IME, and public hospital payments. Members questioned network adequacy, rural access, and the KidCare surplus and expansion; the KidCare realignment drew debate, with some members objecting because the 2023 eligibility expansion has not been implemented, but the amendment passed on a roll call vote. Other amendments adopted included FDLE’s $16.3 million for counter-UAS detection and mitigation equipment, DJJ’s $1.6 million for Florida Scholars Academy and a Social Services Block Grant realignment, and emergency management pass-throughs for FIFA World Cup security and counter-drone funding to the Miami host committee. The Department of Commerce received $148.4 million for disaster recovery under the CDBG-DR program, with questions about the split between housing, infrastructure, and administrative costs. The Department of State also received $408,377 for arts and culture grant authority. Most amendments were adopted without objection, and the commission adjourned after completing the agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Feb 27th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • bucey related to the expansion of eligibility of medicaid for certain individuals under the federal patient
  • the Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence, HB 208 by Harris-Davila, relating to the provision of a patient
  • Hawkins relating to the health benefit plan coverage for the hair prosthesis. for breast cancer patients
  • On county and regional government, HB241 by Guillen relating to state employment preference of certain
  • Relating to the expansion of eligibility for Medicaid to certain individuals under the Federal Patient
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Oct 7th, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sees two patients a day. I'm going to say that again: two patients a day.
  • in some cases. know the patient in some cases.
  • such as staff-to-patient ratios.
  • Putting the patients first, if you're going to reduce patient harm, not circle the wagons.
  • This relates to patient safety.
LA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So if defense attorneys request an SMO opinion or a second appointment, the injured patient gets the
  • So if defense attorneys request an SMO opinion or a second appointment, the injured patient gets the
  • Because she didn't call me by my preferred...
  • Well, let's say she is your employer, and you're not calling her by her preferred pronoun.
  • And you can start in any order that y'all prefer. Am I on? Am I on? Hello?
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 162, which would change the workers’ compensation medical treatment schedule appeals process by allowing additional medical evidence submitted in court to be sent back to the medical director for review and a new opinion. The Attorney General’s office explained the bill, noting a 30-day deadline for the medical director to act before the case returns to court. The bill drew support from injured workers and several business and labor groups, and the committee adopted technical amendments and then reported the bill favorably without objection. House Bill 353, which would establish a state minimum wage starting at $12 in 2027, rising to $15 in 2029 and then indexed to inflation, prompted extensive testimony and debate. Supporters, including the sponsor, Invest in Louisiana, the Workplace Justice Project, 10,000 Women Louisiana, and the AFL-CIO, argued that Louisiana’s wages have lagged behind living costs, that many workers remain in poverty despite working, and that higher wages would help families and local economies. Opponents, including NFIB and several members, argued that the market is already setting wages above the federal minimum in many jobs, that a mandate would raise costs, compress pay scales, reduce hours or jobs, and hurt small businesses. After discussion, the committee voted on the bill and it failed on a roll call vote. The committee then reported Senate Bill 383 favorably with amendments. That bill expands the incumbent worker training program by increasing funding flexibility, shortening the business eligibility period from three years to two, and allowing unobligated funds to roll over. Members and the Louisiana Works secretary discussed workforce training, outreach, and how to connect workers to existing training programs and high-demand jobs. The committee also reported Senate Bill 382 favorably, which repeals the Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council, and began hearing House Bill 422, the “Behind-the-Counter Safety Act,” aimed at workplace violence protections for retail and food service workers, including signage, reporting, and enhanced penalties; the sponsor explained it was intended to address attacks on frontline workers and to give businesses a tool to warn against violence.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • If I had a patient, if you came to me as a general practice veterinarian and you brought me your dog
  • The public understands that veterinarians do not wish to do harm to their patients.
  • </c><04:01:03.840><c> and</c> medical decision for my patients and medical decision for my patients and
  • He said veterinarians retain the ability to do whatever they need for the health of their patient.
  • </c><04:18:39.680><c> client</c> the essential Veterinary patient client the essential Veterinary patient
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 153, which would require two or more law enforcement officers in each county to receive animal cruelty training through the police standards system. Representative Barbara Coma, the sponsor, said the bill was prompted by problems in animal cruelty cases, especially in rural areas without animal control officers, and she described it as a limited training measure. She said an amendment was forthcoming that would add an eight-hour approved course and a two-hour refresher every three years, and she emphasized that the trained officers would serve as resources rather than being required to take action themselves. Members asked about cost, due process, overlap with animal control officers, how trained officers would be identified and notified, and whether veterinarians could fill the role. Coma responded that the bill would not be a heavy financial lift, would not interfere with animal control officers, would apply to livestock as well as companion animals, and would still require law enforcement involvement because veterinarians cannot lawfully remove animals from property. She also said the training could improve due process by helping officers better understand when animal removal is appropriate and how cases should proceed. Sheriff William Wright, speaking for the New Hampshire Sheriffs Association, testified in opposition. He said training itself was acceptable, but the bill went beyond training by creating an obligation for sheriffs and state police to respond to and potentially investigate animal cruelty cases, which he argued would be ambiguous, unfunded, and burdensome for staffing and resources. He said some sheriff’s offices do not have investigative deputies and that the bill could create liability and uncertainty about who would lead investigations. In response to questions, he said the association would likely have no objection if the bill were limited to training, but it opposed the assistance/investigation mandate as written.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And now, members, the moment you've been waiting for very patiently, the clerk will activate the machine
  • My personal preference is that any Title 36 bills and bills for insurance would go through the Insurance
  • But that's my personal preference.
  • There may be a need for it to go through other committees, but that would be my preference.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Health and Human Services Jan 21st, 2026

House Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We could probably do it either way, whatever the committee's preference is. would prefer, but there will
  • I would prefer just a show of hands.
  • They can watch the patient do the exercises and make corrections.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations REVISED Feb 18th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 1344 creates the insulin accessibility program at the health department to increase patient
  • board plays a critical part In the criminal justice system in Oklahoma, and we want to, I think, this patient
  • We can do it now, whichever you prefer.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session: 2025 First Special Session - part 1 Jun 9th, 2025

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Imagine being that patient, and I don't mean to say 'that patient' because I've dealt with a lot of these
  • patients, and not having insurance.
  • I prefer to move in circles, but you guys want us to be in These boxes.
  • In Minnesota, this is about 20% of our patients.
  • PBMs manage tens of millions of pharmacy benefit patients, so they're bigger.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Local Government Committee Apr 29th, 2026

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill would enable VTA to designate a percentage of the housing units we provide with preference
  • , serving hundreds of thousands of low-income families, working people, immigrants, seniors, and patients
  • , and the health care providers, workers, and patients who rely on this safety net system, to express
  • When the health care safety net is weakened, the consequences don't stop with uninsured patients.
  • Because patients wait longer, routine care gets delayed, and communities lose access to services they
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cat declawing prohibited 3/18/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • discretion to use a declaw procedure in the instance that it's medically necessary for the feline patient
  • With mounting evidence of long-term harm to feline patients, we determined this is the right step forward
  • , we determined this is the patients, we determined this is the right<00:03:42.800><c> step</c><00:03
  • What's their preference?
  • What's their preference?
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Which one would you prefer? Good question, and a couple of things about that.
  • So, does the patient still have to make this choice? Think of the question.
  • Yes, if the patient is competent and able to make their own decisions, if they're coherent and awake,
  • Does your bill contemplate a situation where a patient might not be competent to make that choice.
  • Please recognize the very patient Representative Olsen for an introduction.