Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, just to clarify again, Clean Water Act permits, Clean Air Act permits, EPA, DEQ permits, state
• permits, federal permits, they all still have a cause of action because you broke the permit.
• Permits, state permits, federal permits, they all still have a cause of action because you broke the
• permit.
• of the full fee, and gas from incapable wells 17.5 percent of the full fee.

Bills: SB480, HB621, HB637, HB804, HB841, HB1056

Keywords: fishing gear, Oyster Bayou, shrimping, regulation, marine resources, HB621, Act 658, renewable energy, recycling, decommissioning, wind energy, solar power, solar facilities, wind turbines, energy infrastructure, end-of-life disposal, universal waste, recyclable materials, waste reduction, Department of Environmental Quality

Transcript Highlights:

• permit in New Hampshire. permit in New Hampshire.
• And they are applying for a a permit<00:33:51.800> in permit in permit in uh<00:33:53.640>
• We issue permits, and our permits do two key things.
• > permits issue permits and our permits issue permits and our permits do<01:15:49.920> two<
• all, our permits are not contracts. all, our permits are not contracts.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We issue permits for exploration for new mining as well as permits for new mining.
• I don't know that that is a fee that we assessed. That fee was not really based on.
• The division is issuing those permits and has been issuing those permits for some time.
• , increased Tier 2 fee caps.
• What is a Tier 2 fee? Mr. Chair, the Tier 2 fee is the fee that accompanies Tier 2 reporting.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If you have a quota permit under DAX, so you're an actual bar and you have a quota permit.
• with the actual cost to process the fee.
• These are not fees on normal ACH payments.
• The amendment imposes a processing fee limit of the lesser of two...
• fee ends up being.

Transcript Highlights:

• Currently the fees come from fees.
• And this is an attempt to raise some money from the funds by setting a fee, a permit for all the different
• a fee, a permit<05:16:54.878> for<05:16:55.280> all<05:16:55.520> the<05:16:55.920
• He added that right now, with moorings, the cost of that decal is absorbed within the permit fee, so
• by this permit. by this permit.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's also going to include any municipal specific fees and costs, so that would be permit fees and
• And so you're seeing permits and fees as the top line.
• From that, we looked at a reduction in permits and fees, so just a 75% reduction.
• So that would be any of your impact fees or permits and fees that you would have with a permit submitted
• And so we have raw land and permitting and fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• bill, permitting bill, permitting reform<00:01:11.760> and<00:01:12.240> other<00:
• initiative for permitting efficiency. initiative for permitting efficiency.
• uh dealing with permitting uh dealing with permitting efficiency.<00:05:22.479> Um<00:05:
• As we previously testified, state park permit fee increases are necessary to keep pace with rising costs
• Um uh to increase the AIS boat fee.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I had a number of carry permit.
• Wyoming issue concealed carry permit. Wyoming issue concealed carry permit.
• carry permit. carry permit.
• recognize that permit. It reciprocity. recognize that permit.
• All right. they were willing to pay the fee? they were willing to pay the fee?

Bills: HB0111, HB0112, HB0122

Keywords: capital construction, state funding, Wyoming, major maintenance, community colleges, task force, legislative services, budget appropriation, unexpended funds, sunset clause, healthcare, rural health, transformation program, funding, incentives, training, access, perpetuity fund, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We often talk about the permitting process in regards to housing.
• State data shows that only three projects have been permitted since 2011.
• , submit documents, and pay fees.
• A major barrier to new homes is the lack of transparency in our permitting processes.
• fees.

Summary: The Assembly Local Government Committee heard a full agenda of bills focused largely on housing, permitting reform, transportation governance, and local government finance. Early in the hearing, AB 24 by Assemblymember DeMaio proposed changing SANDAG board selection to give rural unincorporated areas a stronger voice; members raised concerns about the approach and local input, and the bill ultimately did not receive a second at the time it was heard. The chair later clarified that because no second was made, the bill was held rather than voted out, though the transcript also reflects confusion and later attempts to revisit the item. Several housing and permitting bills advanced with committee amendments and broad support. AB 671 by Assemblymember Wicks would streamline restaurant permitting through self-certification and faster plan review; AB 920 by Assemblymember Caloza would require a centralized online portal for housing permit tracking in larger jurisdictions; AB 1061 by Assemblymember Kirk Silva would allow SB 9 housing in historic districts with limits to protect historic character; AB 818 by Assemblymember Anamarie Farías would streamline temporary manufactured housing after disasters; AB 660 by Assemblymember Wilson would tighten timelines and remedies for post-entitlement housing permits; AB 1308 by Assemblymember Hoover would allow third-party inspections for small residential projects if local inspections are delayed; and AB 1445 by Assemblymember Haney would expand downtown revitalization financing tools for mixed-use housing. Each of these measures drew support from housing, business, and industry groups, with some local-government and special-district stakeholders seeking continued amendments on certain bills. The committee also approved AB 1156, which updates the solar use easement program to better accommodate renewable energy development on water-constrained agricultural lands, and AB 964, which would let local governments offset certain state mandate reimbursement debts against amounts the state owes them. AB 1223, by Assemblymember Wynn, would let Sacramento-area transportation authorities propose sales tax measures for portions of the county and keep revenues local; it advanced despite some transportation and taxpayer concerns. Consent items AB 36 and AB 1131 were also approved. Most bills were reported out on bipartisan votes, often with committee amendments and some members noting they would continue working on the measures in later committees.

Transcript Highlights:

• It fixes an injection fee.
• Yeah, but I'm talking about the fees, this fee is only for really, truly about emergency response, and
• this fee is really about making sure we have a secondary fund. ...response, and this fee is really about
• So then they want to compare what that two-cent fee may be in Texas to a 19-cent fee here.
• , a 10-cent injection fee.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Because of the fees. Because of the fee. So just keep that in mind.
• Because of the fees. Because of the fee. So just keep that in mind.
• not state permits.
• It's not just permits.
• It may not be a permit.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard HCR 80 by Representative Domangue, which expressed support for private property rights and reviewed the 2025 landman code of conduct. Domangue described concerns about aggressive landmen and expropriation threats, then voluntarily deferred the resolution so Chairman Geymann could present his bill. The committee then took up HB 841, also on expropriation procedures and landman conduct. Geymann explained the bill was aimed at how expropriation negotiations are conducted and enforced, not at whether expropriation is allowed, and cited a recent dispute involving a pipeline right-of-way and threatening letters to landowners. A video of affected landowners was played, and members from industry and landowner groups discussed the need for fair compensation and better communication. The committee adopted two amendment sets to HB 841. The first set made technical changes, removed some court-cost language, broadened the code of conduct to all certificate holders, added a prohibition on threatening landowners with court costs and attorney fees, shortened the response period for offers, and clarified that the rules apply across energy types rather than only carbon capture. The second amendment set added graduated fines for violations, required the Department of Conservation and Energy to collect the fines, and directed the department to post violators on its website. After support testimony and no opposition, HB 841 was reported favorably as amended. The committee next considered HB 621 by Representative Coates, which requires recycling of decommissioned renewable energy infrastructure to the extent practical. An amendment clarified that existing DEQ recycling rules apply. Members raised concerns about decommissioning language, costs, and whether the bill overlapped with existing hazardous-waste and universal-waste rules. Coates agreed to remove the bill’s last sentence on decommissioning costs and add an effective date of January 1, 2027. DEQ explained that many components are already covered under federal and state universal-waste rules, and industry witnesses said solar recycling is feasible and already occurring. HB 621 was then reported favorably as amended. Finally, the committee heard HB 595 by Representative Jacob Landry, which addresses local permits that impede natural resource development, especially road permits affecting Haynesville shale operations. An amendment clarified that local governments may not unreasonably interfere with permitted activity and that road permits not acted on within 30 days are deemed approved. Supporters said delayed parish permits can stall rigs, reduce investment, and hurt royalty owners, while opponents warned the bill could further erode local authority, including in carbon capture matters. Police jury representatives said they were willing to keep working on the issue and suggested a 30- to 45-day target for permit decisions. HB 595 was reported favorably as amended. The committee then began HB 1191 by Representative Landry, creating a certificate of compliance process for oilfield and exploration and production sites, with testimony that it could help clear environmental liability and bring properties back into commerce; the bill was still under amendment and questioning when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• permits relating to the disposal of oil and gas waste.
• House Bill 3158 addresses this gap by establishing... ...application fees for permits and permit amendments
• These non-refundable fees range from $500 to $3,000 depending on the permit type.
• This change aims to bring the EPS unit in line with other Railroad Commission permits. ...permitting
• Requiring permit fees is a sensible way to manage the costs.

Bills: HB1647, HB2612, HB3125, HB3158, HB3240, HB3506, HB3516, HB3707

Keywords: carbon sequestration, environmental policy, Texas, energy, climate change, regulatory council, geothermal energy, workforce development, education and training, energy industry, apprenticeship, energy production, energy policy, renewable energy, state council, administrative law, public information, transparency, government accountability, judicial process

Transcript Highlights:

• FLORIDA HOMEOWNERS SOLAR PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLAR SYSTEMS DUE TO INEFFICIENT
• LOCAL PERMITTING.
• AS A MINUTE INSERT THE WORD APPLICATION TO CLARIFY THE PERMITTING PROCESS SUBMISSION.
• I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR CHANGING THE IMPACT FROM THE PERMIT FEE TO THE ADDRESSING FEE.
• THEY ARE NOT EVEN COMPENSATED FOR THE ATTORNEY FEES IF THEY LOSE THAT CASE.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 3158 addresses this gap by establishing application fees for permits and permit amendments
• These non-refundable fees range from $500 to $3000 depending on the permit time.
• permitting processes and protects public health and the environment.
• Requiring permit fees is a sensible way to manage the costs associated associated with processing these
• permits, and we thank the chairman for carrying this bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Every one of our permits seems to have a water issue, especially the new permits.
• Permits. I heard rumors that you were going to raise the fee to $1,700 or $1,800.
• So, the thing with the fee is we would, if the fee goes forward, and I don't know that's the board's
• Do you have Enough people working on permits? Do you need more allocation for the permit process?
• This $907,000 will take care of the permit backlog and get you people that you can address the permits

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If I go for an alteration terrain permit, if I go for a wetlands permit, if I go for a septic, I pay
• a fee for that.
• Department of Transportation, if I apply for a highway permit, a driveway permit, there's no fee associated
• <00:19:32.240> permit<00:19:32.760> there's<00:19:33.000> no<00:19:33.200> fee
• driveway permit there's no fee driveway permit there's no fee associated<00:19:34.200> with

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Pause the permitting. All the permits on federal lands for any... Pause. Okay.
• Pause the permitting.
• Well, there is a permitting process to get, I guess, a permit to sell fireworks.
• Is it the permit on the state side, or is it on the county side? County. County permit.
• It references fee land; it doesn't reference that it's tribally owned fee land.

Summary: The Tribal and State Relations Committee met at Standing Rock with tribal council members, state legislators, and agency representatives to discuss state-tribal coordination and local priorities. Early discussion focused on process concerns, including the short agenda time and the need for better communication, more advance notice, and more relevant state department staff at future meetings. Tribal leaders asked for lists of state tribal liaisons and bills affecting tribes, and state members said they would follow up, share grant and deadline information, and plan another meeting in Bismarck with program experts and agency staff. A major portion of the meeting centered on health, child welfare, law enforcement, housing, infrastructure, and sovereignty issues. Tribal speakers said rural health transformation funding and other state programs often do not fit direct-service tribes or IHS-funded systems, and they raised concerns about Medicaid, ICWA, foster care delays, human service zones, housing shortages, and the placement of Native children off-reservation. They also discussed missing and murdered Indigenous people, search-and-rescue cooperation, cross-deputization, extradition and banishment ordinances, and the need for stronger law enforcement partnerships that respect tribal sovereignty. Other concerns included poor roads, water and sewer needs in Sioux County communities, census accuracy, and the impact of data centers and other development on water and health. Economic development and regulatory issues were also discussed. Standing Rock representatives raised concerns about charitable gaming and e-pull tabs, saying the machines function like Class III gaming and have harmed tribal revenue while spreading into local businesses. They also described problems with county-issued fireworks permits and state/county liquor licensing rules that they said undermine tribal authority within reservation boundaries. In response, legislators said the committee would continue to look at these issues, and one member suggested possible legislation such as limiting e-tabs near tribal lands. The committee also heard from Joseph McNeil of Sage Development Authority about a 235-megawatt wind project on tribal, allotted, and fee land; he said federal permitting delays have stalled the project and asked for state support to help move it forward. The meeting concluded with a presentation from Dave Archambo of Wojou, a nonprofit focused on land regeneration, buffalo, food sovereignty, cultural programming, and youth wellness. He described the organization’s work on buffalo processing, gardening, fishing, hunting, language, and arts programs, and framed it as a response to historical trauma and community healing. The committee then broke for lunch and planned to resume with the Wojou presentation after the recess.

Transcript Highlights:

• However, they are struggling to legally operate in our current permitting structure.
• Their permanent restaurant permit process will cost exponentially more.
• Recording is a fee-for-service operation, meaning that they rely on fees that they charge to provide
• This is clear evidence that existing fees do not reflect actual costs.
• While the base recording fee is increased under this bill, several other fees are eliminated compared

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to fraudulently use the same permit for multiple victims.
• to see if that is a valid permit or not?
• They apply to us for a student permit, and when they apply to you for the permit, they're by name.
• That permit already includes an image.
• This bill seeks to permit the local government attorneys to collect the fees up to $10,000 per violation

Transcript Highlights:

• fee some time ago.
• You're not permitted to charge any more than that cap, and I don't want to pay that fee.
• It is a capped fee. It is not a mandatory fee. You are correct. It is a capped fee.
• It is not a mandatory fee.
• Fees and all those types of things, surprise fees at the end of the day. And so how does that work?

Summary: The committee first took up SB 712, which would expand California’s smog-check exemption for classic vehicles by adding model years 1976 through 1986 in phases, with a sunset in 2032. The author and supporters, including lowrider advocates and the Specialty Equipment Market Association, argued the bill would preserve car culture, support a small class of rarely driven collector vehicles, and reduce burdens on owners who struggle to find equipment for older smog tests. Opponents, including air district officials, the American Lung Association, and other environmental groups, warned the bill would weaken an important emissions-control program and increase pollution. After discussion, the committee adopted the motion to do pass as amended to Appropriations on a roll call vote of 10-0, with the roll held open for additional votes. The committee then heard SB 800, which requires Caltrans, working with local governments, to assess mitigation measures for suicide prevention on locally owned overpasses crossing state highways. The bill was presented as a response to recent tragedies in Rancho Cucamonga and was supported by local officials, health organizations, and suicide-prevention advocates, who said the measure would help identify high-risk locations and lead to life-saving interventions. There was no registered opposition. The committee members expressed support, and SB 800 was passed to Appropriations on a unanimous roll call vote, with the roll held open. Next, the committee considered SB 30, which would prohibit California public entities from selling, donating, or transferring decommissioned diesel locomotives and railroad equipment with Tier 1 or older engines unless the engine is removed, while allowing Tier 2 and newer transfers under certain conditions. The author and supporters framed the bill as a climate and public-health measure to prevent older, dirtier locomotives from continuing to pollute elsewhere, while transit agencies opposed it, arguing it could limit useful transfers of equipment that still supports passenger service and could be better handled through case-by-case air-quality review. After debate, the committee voted 6-4 to pass SB 30 as amended to Appropriations, with the roll held open for later additions. The committee also heard SB 791, which replaces the flat dealer document processing charge cap with a 1% fee capped at $350, along with new disclosure requirements. Dealers and industry groups supported the bill as a way to recover costs and improve transparency, while consumer advocates opposed it as an unjustified increase that would burden buyers. The committee approved SB 791 on a 8-? roll call vote and held the roll open. The meeting then moved on to SB 34, a port-air-quality bill presented by Senator Richardson, but the transcript ends during testimony and debate on that measure.