Transcript Highlights:

• it was going to be $200 million as a comprehensive recovery center, federal dollars that never materialized
• We've done so much with so little and promises of funding that never materialized, which I'll just say
• But the institutionalization of a movement has led to challenges and things that never materialized.
• And it is happening, and programs are happening there regardless of funding that never materialized or
• never must have happened. materialized here because doers do so.

Transcript Highlights:

• made a small clarifying change regarding the estimated timeline and cost estimates, ensuring that materials
• This bill ensures accountability and transparency in material management.
• Um, to date, we've recycled 2500 tons of fiberglass material, um, for over 300 blades at projects across
• What, what's the, um, reporting requirement for the person that Material he owns and runs, let's say
• it to for disposal is a regulated authorized company that's going to do the right thing with the material

Bills: HB205

Keywords: disaster recovery, economic development, grants, loans, infrastructure support

Transcript Highlights:

• I will also present materials that give much more detail about the board's leases and the operations
• in the last few years, these delays also exacerbate the problem. are exacerbated by the fact that material
• you to build the project a year ago is going to be an order of magnitude greater because of those material
• Shortage that is playing into this housing affordability—every input, whether it be materials, land—which
• We face high interest rates, high costs of materials, high insurance costs, high development fees, and

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Material incorporated by reference into a rule, such as forms, manuals, and books, may also meet the
• the number of forms and manuals incorporated by referencing the rules, but based on the amount of material
• Based on the amount of material reviewed by the committee staff, it is estimated roughly equal to the
• busy—they reviewed 1,355 proposed rules, 119 emergency rules, as well as 1,243 forms, manuals, and other material
• incorporated by reference. 119 emergency rules, as well as 1,243 forms, manuals, and other material

Summary: The committee received an informational presentation from the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee (JAPC/JAPSI) staff and Chair Representative Overdorf on how Florida administrative rulemaking is reviewed. Mr. Plant explained that JAPC is a joint legislative oversight committee that monitors agency rules under Chapter 120, focusing on whether rules stay within statutory authority, whether agencies are acting consistently with legislative intent, and how the rulemaking process works. He emphasized that agencies are creatures of statute, that rulemaking authority must be specific enough to support the rule, and that without a date certain in statute, agencies may delay rulemaking indefinitely. Members asked about how to ensure agencies actually adopt rules, how to identify rules that exceed legislative intent, and how JAPC handles internal policies and delayed rulemaking. Representative Overdorf then described JAPC’s objection process and its limits. He said the committee does not approve or disapprove rules or direct agencies to adopt them, but it can object to proposed or existing rules that enlarge, modify, or contravene enabling statutes or fail to comply with Chapter 120. He noted that if an agency does not resolve an objection, a footnote is published in the Florida Administrative Code and the committee may recommend legislation to amend, suspend, or repeal the rule. He also discussed recent committee activity, including 1,355 proposed rules, 119 emergency rules, and 1,243 incorporated materials reviewed in 2024, and said the committee filed 31 objections against one agency after repeated noncompliance. The discussion also touched on possible changes to Chapter 120, including the governor’s 2019 request that agencies include five-year sunset provisions in rules, and a proposal to instead require periodic legislative review rather than automatic expiration. Overdorf also said the committee is considering raising the current statement of estimated regulatory costs thresholds of $200,000 annually or $1 million over five years because inflation has made those limits too low. No votes were taken on legislation, and the meeting ended with adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it just runs the gamut: automotive, energy, electronics, first responders, materials, semiconductors
• And it just runs the gamut: automotive, energy, electronics, first responders, materials, semiconductors
• And it just runs the gamut: automotive, energy, electronics, first responders, materials, semiconductors
• , you know, first responders, material, you know, first responders, material, semiconductors,<01:
• PAS material. PAS material.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:01:40 Chair Comments 00:02:51 Rep. Nima Kulkarni PFAS Presentation 00:04:35 EEC PFAS Presentation 00:39:36 Rusty Cress PFAS Presentation 01:01:10 Chair Comments on Admin Regs and Reports Received 01:14:41, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Basically, we had a material audit adjustment for those campuses, and we proposed these material audit
• And because it was for a material amount, that's why we had the finding.
• We had one material weakness in internal control...
• Of the 11 institutions, we have not found any material concerns at all.
• Of the 11 institutions, we have not found any material concerns at all.

Summary: The committee met to receive a series of audit presentations, beginning with the statewide Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for fiscal year 2025. The State Auditor’s Office and OMB reported a clean, unmodified opinion for the state, with strong financial results including a $40.6 billion net position, $30.99 billion in assets, $1.81 billion in liabilities, and continued Legacy Fund growth. OMB also explained the new GASB 101 compensated-absences reporting change and discussed pension-liability fluctuations tied to discount-rate assumptions and investment performance. Members asked about how the state compares to others and about the effect of short-term commodity price swings, and OMB said the report reflects actual fiscal-year results rather than forecasts. The committee then heard the University System audit, which also received a clean opinion but included four findings: misreporting of Strategic Investment and Improvements Fund revenue, insufficient monitoring of service organizations at CTS, NDSU, and UND, improper bank reconciliations at Dakota College of Bottineau, Dickinson State, and Williston State, and investment/cash reconciliation problems at Bismarck State College related to bond proceeds. University officials agreed with the findings and said corrective actions were underway, including internal review of bank reconciliations. Members raised questions about NDSU’s use of certificates of deposit, and university staff explained that CDs are used to earn interest on funds being accumulated for future projects. Several other audits were presented, most with clean opinions and no findings, including the State Auditor’s Office, Workforce Safety and Insurance, Housing Finance Agency, Housing Incentive Fund, Job Service North Dakota, the Retirement and Investment Office, PERS, the Center for Distance Education, the Commission on Legal Counsel for Indigents, the Ethics Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. Notable exceptions included a State Fair Association audit with an adverse opinion on the foundation component unit because its financial statements were not available for audit, and a Securities Department performance audit finding that performance-based pay increases and bonuses were issued without required evaluations. The committee also discussed the State Auditor’s future needs, including more staff capacity, data analytics, cybersecurity reviews, possible subpoena authority, independent legal counsel, and whether some audits—such as the Ethics Commission and State Fair—should be handled by independent third parties or under different statutory arrangements.

Transcript Highlights:

• we've provided do a good job materials we've provided do a good job of<00:18:26.559> providing
• for uh judicial construction materials for uh judicial centers.<00:37:36.720> Um<00:37:37.200
• Because we don't give upfront exemptions to contractors who may have bought more materials that aren't
• You know, it's not an upfront exemption when the materials are purchased.
• You know, it's not an upfront exemption when the materials are purchased.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Mitigation options have a capital cost through the production of materials, the transportation of materials
• Mitigation options have a capital cost through the production of materials, the transportation of materials
• Mitigation options have a capital cost through the production of materials, the transportation of materials
• The production of materials, the transportation of materials, and the installation of those materials
• , through recycling materials and also construction methods like reuse and reclamation.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• You see, in Minnesota, we have the taconite, the timber, and many of the materials that were used in
• However, it's not just the hard materials that we rely on anymore to be competitive, not just in our
• and<00:02:51.200> many<00:02:51.400> of<00:02:51.560> the<00:02:51.720> materials
• that were used and many of the materials that were used in<00:02:53.120> things<00:02:53.400>
• that we rely on anymore to be materials that we rely on anymore to be competitive<00:03:12.959> not

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to Include extraneous material
• Members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material
• Members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material
• members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks And include extraneous material
• FIVE LEGISLATIVE DAYS IN WHICH TO REVISE AND EXTEND THEIR REMARKS AND INCLUDE EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL ON

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, February 23, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, we do not have any material weaknesses for the Legislative Coordinating Commission.
• Um, so oftentimes when we do audits, we do have material weaknesses and significant deficiencies, just
• Uh we do not have<00:09:38.720> any<00:09:38.959> material<00:09:39.360> weaknesses<
• /c><00:09:39.839> for<00:09:40.080> the have any material weaknesses for the have any material
• do audits, we do have material do audits, we do have material weaknesses<00:10:03.120> and

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:09:58.160> commonly Society of testing materials commonly Society of testing materials
• ><00:10:09.760> a specific manufacturing process of a specific manufacturing process of a material
• and determine the exact material and determine the exact chemical<00:10:12.040> composition<00
• :10:12.560> of<00:10:12.680> a<00:10:12.800> material<00:10:13.680> in chemical
• composition of a material in chemical composition of a material in December December December 2023m<

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:08:56.480> We've we've asked for those materials.
• We've we've asked for those materials.
• And in this case, there are no genuine issues of material fact about any of these charges."
• And in this case, there are no genuine issues of material fact about any of these charges. Okay.
• And in this case, there are no genuine issues of material fact about any of these charges. Okay.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission met on November 18, 2025, approved the October 14 minutes, and then took up five motions in ethics matters 24LEC3 and 24LEC6. Those motions included a renewed motion to dismiss and motion to quash by Representative Daniel Gberg, a renewed motion to compel/sanctions and continuance request by Mr. Jenkins, and competing motions in limine concerning evidence and redaction of deposition transcripts. Vice Chair Mike Schaw was appointed hearing officer for the motion practice, and the commission agreed to hear the motions one at a time in open session. Representative Chris Lily joined later by Zoom. Counsel for Representative Gberg argued the remaining allegations were minor, that the commission lacked key exculpatory materials such as an alleged LRC report, policies, procedures, and training materials, and that the record did not support the ethics charges. She also argued the case had been broadened by extraneous allegations and that the respondent had been unfairly prejudiced. Enforcement counsel responded that he had produced all materials in his possession, that any LRC materials were not in the commission’s custody, and that the commission’s probable-cause findings were based on sworn testimony and affidavits already in the record. He argued the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment should be denied because genuine issues of material fact remained and the commission had already found probable cause on three ethics violations. Commission members questioned both sides about the alleged LRC report and whether it was part of the commission’s record. The chair stated the commission had not relied on any LRC report and had not withheld anything, while another member emphasized that the proceeding concerned alleged violations of the ethics code, not LRC sexual-harassment policy. A commissioner also noted the unusual structure of the proceeding and questioned whether the complaints, taken as true, stated a basis for dismissal. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the standard for dismissal and summary judgment, with no final ruling on the motions captured in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:50:27.839> constraints<00:50:28.319> with or building material constraints with
• You might not control tariffs on construction materials or construction labor supply.
• Costly building material mandates that force housing to use more expensive materials even when a cheaper
• material that's fully safe might have done the job.
• material materials even when a cheaper material that's<00:51:30.000> fully<00:51:30.319> safe

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:05 Roll Call 00:00:12 Discussion of Legislative Measures 00:03:12 Discussion of Housing and Land Use 00:21:58 Discussion of Short Term Rental Policies 01:03:17 Adjournment 01:15:38, 958, all

Summary: The committee approved the minutes from its June 4, 2025 meeting and then heard a series of presentations focused largely on housing and land-use policy. Senator Robbie Mills and Representative Josh Bray discussed two 2025 housing measures: Senate Bill 50, which would create residential infrastructure development districts to help local governments finance infrastructure for new housing developments through special assessments and local debt, and House Bill 7, which would let local governments identify development areas and rebate new property tax revenue to developers as an incentive for housing growth. They said Kentucky faces a statewide housing shortage of roughly 210,000 units, projected to grow if building patterns do not change, and argued that regulatory relief and financing tools are needed to increase supply. Representative Rebecca Rymer presented House Bill 371, which would require local permitting when an industry’s residual waste landfill is located in a different county from the industry itself. She said current law lets such landfills bypass local review, leaving host counties with no say despite road impacts and other local burdens. She said the bill would preserve the existing exemption when the landfill and industry are co-located, and noted support from KLC and KO. Representative Steve Doan also described House Bill 806, a statewide backyard chicken bill that would allow domesticated hens, prohibit roosters, set a minimum of six hens that local governments could not go below, and preserve local authority over setbacks, sanitation, maintenance standards, and egg sales. He said it would override outright local bans but not HOA restrictions, and cited a current Northern Kentucky dispute and ADA litigation as reasons for the proposal. The committee then heard a broader discussion on housing and land use from Charlie Gardner of the Mercatus Center and Nolan Gray of California YIMBY and the Bluegrass Institute. They outlined categories of land-use regulation, described the recent growth of state-level housing reforms nationwide, and cited examples such as ADU legalization, smaller lot sizes, reduced parking minimums, streamlined permitting, and single-stair or other building-code reforms. They argued that housing shortages are a statewide concern, that localities often have incentives to block growth, and that state intervention can reduce costs and uncertainty without compromising health and safety. Members asked about the housing shortage estimate, the effect of red tape on safety and local authority, and how state reforms could be phased in; the presenters said reforms often include lead time, can be targeted to larger jurisdictions, and should focus on reducing time and cost while maintaining basic standards.

Transcript Highlights:

• So districts and particularly teachers are now expected to teach only factually accurate material under
• We need to hire the people to be able to develop that guidance and materials to put out there for the
• We do believe that the resources in here—we've asked for contract dollars to help develop materials and
• I don't know if I can speak to the outcome in terms of the materials being shared with the folks and
• We should have materials developed.

Summary: The subcommittee heard presentations on several GovOps-related budget proposals, beginning with ongoing funding for the California Education Learning Lab. The Learning Lab described its intersegmental grants to UC, CSU, and community college faculty, including AI-related work and a math alignment project, and said the Governor’s proposal would move the program’s home agency to GovOps and restore $4 million annually. The Department of Finance supported the proposal as a way to improve coordination, while the LAO recommended rejecting it, arguing the projects are hard to scale, similar professional development already exists in the segments, and the state should consider saving General Fund dollars. Senators split on the value of the program, with some emphasizing innovation and intersegmental collaboration and others questioning its measurable long-term impact; the item was held open. The committee then reviewed the Office of Civil Rights proposal to implement AB 715 and SB 48 with $3.5 million in 2026-27 and $2.8 million ongoing. GovOps said the office had been set up administratively, positions were being recruited, and it would provide training, technical assistance, and complaint review related to anti-Semitism and other discrimination in TK-12 schools. The LAO had no concerns, but senators raised substantial questions about the office’s placement in GovOps, the lack of guidance while the laws are being implemented, the use of gubernatorial appointees, and whether the staffing structure matches the likely workload across different discrimination categories. GovOps said it would develop guidance, coordinate with CDE, and shift resources as needed once staff are hired, but several members said they were not prepared to support the item as presented; it was also held open. After public comment supporting the California Education Interagency Council, the subcommittee approved vote-only items 11 through 17 and 6 through 10. It then heard from the Office of Data and Innovation on a request for five positions and $1.25 million in reimbursement authority to expand digital service delivery work. ODI described projects such as reducing unauthorized EBT theft and forecasting community water system outages, and said it uses guardrails and contracts to protect sensitive data when working with vendor AI services. The LAO had no concerns, and members generally praised ODI’s small, high-impact role; the item was held open. Finally, the Department of Technology presented on the Middle-Mile Broadband Initiative, reporting that 423 miles are complete, more than 70% of the network has been permitted, and about 5,300 miles are expected to be completed by December 2026, with some work potentially slipping into 2027. CDT said Skyline Technology Solutions had been selected to operate the network and that the third-party administrator, Golden State Net, would continue to support development and later help oversee operations and sales. The LAO noted the project’s progress but raised concerns about the novel three-party structure, accountability, and long-term financial sustainability. Senators questioned the legal basis for the operator arrangement, the revenue outlook, reporting to the Legislature, and whether the network will be self-sustaining; CDT said it expects revenues to cover operations over time and will continue annual and quarterly reporting. The item was left open.

Transcript Highlights:

• is Senate Bill 232, which is an act relating to public libraries and the Department of Libraries materially
• Senate Bill 327 is an act relating to economic development affecting the revenue of the state and materially
• is Senate Bill 232, which is an act relating to public libraries and the Department of Libraries materially
• Senate Bill 327 is an act relating to economic development affecting the revenue of the state and materially
• with other materially interfering with other residents'<00:23:01.400> recovery,<00:23:02.200>

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House opened with a devotional in honor of Earth Day, then referred three Senate bills to money committees under House Rule 35A: S. 173 to Appropriations, and S. 232 and S. 327 to Ways and Means. The chamber also adopted JRS 50, a joint resolution setting weekend adjournment so the House and Senate would reconvene no later than April 28, 2026. Several members then made announcements recognizing guests and interns in the gallery, including a homeschooling eighth grader, UVM interns, a constituent shadowing a member, family members, and a Civil Air Patrol delegation. The House next took up S. 89, expanding survivor benefits, and passed it in concurrence with proposal of amendment. It then considered S. 157 on recovery residence certification. The Human Services Committee described the bill as making permanent a temporary framework for certified recovery residences, placing oversight with the Department of Health, requiring standards, data collection, and annual reporting, and preserving resident protections such as written agreements, notice, grievance procedures, and alternative housing arrangements. The committee also said the bill would modernize definitions and repeal the sunset on the current framework. Human Services voted 9-0-2 to recommend the strike-all amendment, and Ways and Means reported the bill favorable 11-0-0, noting no fiscal impact unless a future fee is proposed and enacted. The House adopted the amendment, ordered third reading, and moved the bill forward. The final major item was S. 239, creating a child abuse and neglect reporting working group. The Human Services Committee said Vermont’s mandated reporting system has not been substantially reviewed in over a decade and that the bill would convene experts to review the law and recommend updates. Committee testimony emphasized that Vermont has a very high reporting rate but relatively low rates of substantiation and referral to supportive services, and members said the working group should examine reporting before, during, and after a report, including alternatives when in a child’s best interests. The committee’s strike-all amendment added findings, narrowed and prioritized the working group membership to people with direct child-serving or mandated-reporting experience, set deadlines for an interim report by April 1, 2027 and final recommendations by October 1, 2027, and required the first meeting by August 15. The committee also heard from a wide range of child welfare, education, law enforcement, and advocacy witnesses.

Transcript Highlights:

• that I've been able to have with some of the deer farmers and other folks in this regard and the materials
• Um, I have taken a lot of time to review those materials and read as much as I could about the science
• this in this regard um and the materials this in this regard um and the materials that<00:26:06.600
• and<00:26:13.760> um<00:26:14.040> read<00:26:14.400> as to review those materials
• and um read as to review those materials and um read as much<00:26:14.720> as<00:26:14.840>

Bills: HF3548

Keywords: farm assistance, down payment, agriculture, state funding, loan modification, 1183, house

Summary: The Agricultural Finance and Policy Committee met on April 15, 2026, approved the April 13 minutes with a correction to Assistant Commissioner Peter Kesset’s name, and then took up House File 3548. The bill, moved by Chair Anderson for re-referral to Ways and Means, centered on the farmer down payment assistance program and the Department of Agriculture’s budget and policy provisions. Anderson described the DE4 amendment as compromise language that reserved up to 25% of funds for applicants with purchase contracts, removed a proposed marijuana exclusion, and allowed appropriated funds to remain available through June 30, 2030 rather than reverting to the general fund at the end of the biennium. Laura Schreiber of the Land Stewardship Project testified in support, emphasizing the importance of keeping funds available and urging that grants remain capped at $20,000 so more farmers could participate. The committee then adopted several amendments. A23, described as the governor’s budget request and department policy bill, was adopted and included moving the Emerging Farmers Office into the Agricultural Marketing and Development subdivision, combining some reports into the Agri report, and addressing delegated authority with MDA. A17, allowing certain eggs past their quality assurance date to be donated to food shelves under specific handling requirements, was adopted. A18, adjusting per diem rates for certain non-representative committee members, was adopted. A19, shifting about $20,000 to support farm land transition services such as mediation, contracts, financial planning, tax preparation, estate planning, and housing assistance, was also adopted. A22, which combined funding for wolf depredation claims and the local food purchasing program, drew the most debate. Representative Smith questioned why the two items were combined and sought to divide the amendment, but staff said that would be problematic because the funding changes were interdependent. Supporters said the amendment would pay about 80% of wolf-loss claims and add money for local food purchasing, while opponents argued the local food need was greater and the wolf depredation approach was not the best use of funds. The roll call on A22 was confusing in the transcript, but the amendment ultimately prevailed. A21, which would have removed a physical-contact requirement for farm cervidae containment, failed on a 7-7 tie after opponents argued it would weaken disease protections and supporters said the fencing costs were driving deer farmers out of business. Hansen then declined to move A24, which would have advanced a paraquat ban, saying there was no agreement and he did not want a negative vote at that time. After the DE4 as amended was adopted, the committee took a final roll call on House File 3548 as amended. The bill failed on a 6-8 vote and was laid over. In closing, members on both sides said the bill contained useful provisions for farmers, but disagreement over the unresolved paraquat issue prevented the committee from advancing it.

Transcript Highlights:

• Additional feedback focused on the identification of high-quality instructional materials aligned to
• the science reading, and faculty supervisors having access to and using high-quality instructional materials
• According to PED, all K-8 teacher preparation programs have submitted the requested desk audit materials
• , given that currently only 54 of school districts have purchased ELA high-quality instructional materials
• responsibility of LEAs and PEDs to ensure that all districts purchase high-quality instructional materials

Transcript Highlights:

• Gardening materials and mitigation tools extending both of these programs guarantees fire-threatened
• Assembly Bill 993 by Assemblymember Hadwick, an act relating to hazardous materials.
• eligibility to these counties, increases local capacity to respond to wildfires and other hazardous material
• They require minor construction activities but are built with durable, low-to-moderate cost materials
• . materials, and lasts from one year to five years.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• by Schaffner relate to the prosecution of certain criminal offenses prohibiting sexually explicit material
• affirmative defense of prosecution, the criminal offense of the sale, distribution, and harmful material
• 1853 by Moody relating to the availability of certain information regarding persons who provide materials
• nature and to the confidentiality or of the restrictions on the availability of certain property material
• HB 2362 by Garcia Bay relating to the exemption from sales and use of taxes for educational materials