Bills: HJR99, HB1399, HB1400, HB 1094, HB365, HB 1109, HB647, HCR35, SB14, HB 12, HB1522, HB422, HB675, HB204, HB748, HB912, HJR99, HB1399, HB1400, HB 1094, HB365, HB 1109, HB647, HCR35, HCR123, HCR124, HR57, HR87, HR111, HR228, HR230, HR322, HR624, HR625, HR626, HR627, HR628, HR630, HR631, HR634, HR635, HR636, HR637, HR638, HR639, HR640, HR645, HR646, HR648, HR649, HR651, HR652, HR653, HR654, HR664, HR665, HR668, HR675, HR676, HR678, HR679, HR680, HR683, HR686, HR688, HR689, HR694, HR695, HR697, HR698, HR699, HR472, HR622, HR632, HR633, HR643, HR655, HR657, HR660, HR661, HR662, HR663, HR667, HR670, HR674, HR681, HR682, HR696

Keywords: animal feed, tax exemption, ad valorem taxation, retail, constitutional amendment, retail sale, tangible personal property, Texas tax code, groundwater, water conservation, financial assistance, Texas Water Development Board, innovation fund, local conservation districts, transportation protection agreement, funeral services, insurance exemption, regulation, deceased transportation, HB 365

Transcript Highlights:

• I thought you said there was a reduction of $45 million there. Is that correct?"
• "Reduction of the GR. See where it says GR, the blind pension fund.
• I've got a compromise—was that $400,000 in the program, not a reduction, right?
• It's a reduction of $500,000. The appropriation would be $500,000.
• Page 57. 405, House. 405 CWIS replacement, Senate on the reduction.

Summary: The conference committee spent most of the meeting working through House Bill 2, the education budget, with repeated debate over how to close the remaining gap in the foundation formula. Members discussed fund swaps involving the blind pension fund, capital commission fund, lottery proceeds, state school money, and classroom trust funds, with several senators arguing the committee should fully fund the formula if possible and warning against leaving schools with a shortfall. The committee also reviewed child care subsidies, Parents as Teachers language, school safety and assessment-related items, Title I reallocation language, and a compromise on flexibility percentages for certain education lines. Several members raised concerns about language restricting virtual Parents as Teachers visits and about child care subsidy language tied to enrollment-based payment and prospective payment, while others defended the compromise as a way to balance provider concerns and budget limits. House Bill 3, covering higher education, was also reviewed. The committee largely accepted Senate positions on appropriations, with a compromise on the St. Louis Community College nursing program and a new proposal directing the Department of Higher Education to develop a new funding model by December 1, 2026. That language drew concern from some members, who said the timeline was too aggressive and asked for more flexibility, but supporters said prior work on performance funding justified the deadline. The committee then moved through House Bill 2004, transportation, agreeing to a mix of Senate positions and compromises on items such as safety operations, low-volume roads, port funding, and road improvements, including a larger-than-expected appropriation for Clarendon Road tied to a State Fair relocation plan. House Bill 5, general administration and IT, generated the most controversy over new language directing a plan for state IT modernization and cloud migration; several members objected that it was too prescriptive, resembled a resolution, and could favor a specific vendor, but the chair said the goal was accountability and oversight. The committee left some House Bill 5 items open for further negotiation, then later returned to finalize several dollar amounts and a shorter conference proposal on the IT language. The committee also worked through House Bills 7, 8, and 9, mostly adopting Senate positions with a few compromises. House Bill 7 covered economic development and tourism items, including Main Street, Missouri One Start, broadband, Juneteenth, and the Great American State Fair, with some items set aside for later or moved to other bills. House Bill 8 focused on public safety and veterans’ funding, including school safety apps, fentanyl testing, crime lab workload, DNA testing, veterans’ programs, and Highway Patrol fleet and fuel items; members debated whether to keep fleet and fuel funding separated or rolled together, and several items were set at compromise levels. House Bill 9, covering mental health and corrections, was handled more briefly, with most items following Senate positions and a few compromises, including probation and parole funding and a reduction on one appropriation. The committee then recessed and later resumed with House Bill 2010, beginning work on another budget bill with a mix of Senate, House, and compromise positions on early line items, but the transcript cuts off before that bill is completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• of $600,000 in fiscal year 2026-27 and a reduction of $1 million in fiscal year 2028-29.
• there's a reduction of 600,000 in<00:18:29.360><c> fiscal</c><00:18:29.679><c> year</c> in fiscal year
• of 1 million in 2627 and uh a reduction of 1 million in fiscal<00:18:34.160><c> year</c> fiscal year
• On the 6th, it was only lines 432 to 433, which showed the reduction of the direct appropriation.
• The budget includes narrow reductions to help tackle the projected budgetary imbalance in the FY 2028

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Line 18 is the reduction to the SA Foundation.
• </c><00:32:23.519><c> to</c> then there is a 1 million reduction to then there is a 1 million reduction
• Line 30 uh shows the reduction bianium.
• Lastly, we know the decisions around reductions are not easy.
• Lastly, we know the decisions around reductions are not easy.

Bills: HF1388

Keywords: BARR Center, Building Assets, Reducing Risks, education finance, school funding, grant appropriation, evidence-based program, student achievement, social and emotional learning, school climate, teacher effectiveness, high school graduation, students in poverty, students of color, BIPOC, equity in education, Minnesota Department of Education, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools, school coaching

Transcript Highlights:

• Correctional services have a direct impact on public safety, including crime reduction, fewer victims
• A 1% reduction in the state's three-year reimprisonment rate would yield an estimated $5.4 million in
• Chair, Senator Pappas, it has had a reduction.
• So there has been a reduction.
• Chair, Senator Limmer, we have heard certainly some concerns about the reduction in that funding.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• AND HISTORICAL REVERSION AND DEBT SERVICE REDUCTIONS.
• BEEN NO WAY TO ADDRESS THAT YET. >> Ex Officio Hart: ONE OTHER QUESTION, AS IT RELATES TO FTES AND REDUCTION
• OR REDUCTION IN WORK STAFF OVER IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE THEN I SEE IN THE SENATE.
• WHEN I LOOK AT LINE 65 I SEE A 39 MILLION REDUCTION IN MAJOR REPAIRS AND RENOVATION ON THE HOUSE SIDE
• I'M LOOKING AT LINES 233 SPECIFICALLY UNDER PUBLIC DEFENDERS AND IT'S THE REDUCTION IN VACANT POSITIONS

Transcript Highlights:

• However, there is one reduction in force.
• Just based on— because here's what I'm hearing in my community when we talk about reductions in force
• in force... ...some of this, you may not have, but when we begin to look at the reduction in force and
• Okay, and so out of the 56, we have just five that are just kind of in operation, and then the reduction
• ...which should mean that we have some sort of reduction in overtime.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• SENATORS, UNDER TAB HAVE ONE AT LET'S TAKE UP SB 1906 ON DEBT REDUCTION BY SENATOR BRODEUR.
• MEMBERS, WE HAVE IN STATUTE A DEBT REDUCTION STRATEGY OUTLINED BY THE DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE.
• IT IS A GRADUAL REDUCTION.
• HOUSE BILL 7031 ON TAX RATE REDUCTION. BY WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
• SEVERAL OTHER REDUCTIONS WERE AT 7.5 PERCENT.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• CSBG, while it has not had a reduction in funding yet, is identified for elimination in Project 2025.
• While CSBG has not had a reduction in funding yet, it is identified for elimination in Project 2025,
• When we lose state and federal funding, that is a reduction in services for the community, and it's a
• reduction in employees for us.
• And it's a reduction in employees for us. So there's a potential for people being laid off.

Summary: The Senate and Assembly Human Services Committees held a special oversight hearing on California’s 2026-27 Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) state plan, a federal anti-poverty funding stream. Committee members opened by citing statewide poverty and homelessness data and said the hearing was meant to review how CSBG dollars are used, how local agencies respond to community needs, and how the state is preparing for possible federal funding cuts. Jason Wimbley of the Department of Community Services and Development (CSD) explained that California’s CSBG network works through 60 organizations in 58 counties, serving about 1.5 million low-income Californians in 2023, and that the state received $68.4 million in federal CSBG funds in fiscal year 2025. He described the program as flexible funding used for housing, employment, education, food, health, transportation, and emergency response, and noted that the federal administration had proposed eliminating CSBG, though the Senate Appropriations Committee had voted to fully fund it for the coming year. Representatives from the California Community Action Partnership Association and several CSBG-funded agencies described how the program supports local anti-poverty work and leverages other funding. CalCAPA emphasized local flexibility, workforce development, partnerships, and data systems such as ROMA, while also warning that agencies are preparing for possible reductions by tightening budgets, planning staffing contingencies, and seeking private foundation support. Agency witnesses from Contra Costa County, Northern California Indian Development Council, Proteus, and Sacred Heart Community Service described services including housing assistance, food distribution, utility help, employment training, youth programs, and culturally specific services for Native communities and migrant farmworkers. They repeatedly said CSBG is essential because it funds staffing and infrastructure that allow them to braid other grants and serve people who do not qualify for standard safety-net programs. Members also asked about the impact of federal staffing changes and the Los Angeles fires. Wimbley said federal layoffs had affected some CSD programs but not CSBG administration, and that the department coordinated disaster response with state agencies and used CSBG-funded supply distribution, food, water, clothing, and documentation support during the fires. Witnesses said they were preparing for possible future cuts by diversifying funding, reducing expenses, and considering service changes, while county officials warned that state and federal reductions could not be backfilled locally. During public comment, one speaker urged stronger oversight of community action agencies and raised concerns about transparency and compliance with state law. The chair then thanked the witnesses, emphasized the importance of CSBG for low-income seniors, youth, and people with disabilities, and adjourned the hearing without any votes or formal action taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• and make reductions where we see<00:07:52.560><c> inefficiencies.
• </c> also removed we moved up the reduction also removed we moved up the reduction to<00:48:50.079><c
• </c><00:50:35.839><c> were</c> target and all of these reductions were target and all of these reductions
• I have reductions out of the classroom.
• ><c> our</c><01:16:40.159><c> budget</c> the reductions given our budget the reductions given our budget

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• But in terms of budgeting and ongoing overhead, there is a permanent reduction of the overhead in the
• I just want to make it clear: if you didn't do this, that would be a permanent reduction in subsequent
• Is there a reduction in service on that side?
• And for the first time, the city of L.A. is saying an 18% reduction in homelessness, the highest reduction
• And so should there be a reduction in workload? Physically and through the files.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• $8 million reduction for early childhood support.
• It's a reduction, and I mean, it goes back to the general fund. It's a reduction.
• In this case, there's no reduction in benefits, but there's a reduction in federal participation in the
• On the reduction, they were reducing their emergency room visits.
• On the reduction, they were reducing their emergency room visits.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There's no reduction there. Absolutely.
• So this reduction... ...this break is going to be on income tax and not property tax. I agree.
• So this reduction, this break is going to be on income tax and not property tax. I agree.
• What it does is it tips off a very slow gradual reduction in the assessment rate of our fourth class
• So the value of vehicles outpaces the reductions of that assessed rate in my bill.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Summary: The Ways and Means Committee met with a quorum and first voted on House Bill 1771, which would give taxpayers 60 days to pay a tax liability without penalty or interest if a benevolent tax credit is later disallowed. Members described it as a charitable-donation-related fix, and the bill received unanimous due-pass approval. The committee then considered House Bill 1883, with discussion focused on clarifying tax treatment related to auction sales and a proposed amendment to add a separate medical-equipment sales tax exemption that had previously been paired with other legislation. Some members objected to combining the unrelated medical-equipment provision with the auctioneers bill, but the amendment and substitute were adopted, and the bill ultimately passed on a 5-4 vote. House Bill 1892, dealing with depreciation schedules for new pipelines, was amended to change the relevant period from 50 years to 20 years. Supporters said the change would align the bill with its intent and provide consistency across counties, while opponents argued the State Tax Commission’s 50-year approach should be respected. The committee adopted the amendment and substitute and then passed the bill 6-3. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 1919, which would require employers with 10 or more employees to file withholding returns electronically, bringing state practice into line with IRS requirements. The sponsor and Department of Revenue supported the bill, citing convenience, fraud prevention, and faster processing; an opposition witness argued it removed a choice from businesses and raised concerns about data security and flexibility. No action was taken on the bill. The committee also heard House Bill 2215, which would allow a Missouri income tax deduction for personal property tax paid, with the sponsor framing it as immediate relief for taxpayers facing rising personal property tax bills. Testimony from a school-related witness emphasized that the proposal would reduce local revenue and should be considered in the context of school funding and a broader formula rewrite. Finally, House Bill 2859 proposed a gradual reduction in the assessment rate for class four vehicles, rather than a broader personal property tax reduction. The sponsor argued vehicle values and tax collections have risen sharply and that the bill would slow growth rather than cut existing revenue, while the Missouri Municipal League opposed it because smaller communities with limited sales tax bases could be harmed. The hearing concluded without further action, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• In fact, one of those, as it left the floor of the Senate, one of those reductions was a change to the
• It also included an array of tax reductions taking effect in 2029 and 2030.
• Those adjustments made by the House are quite simply tax reductions, similar to those included in the
• and void clause, meaning that if the income tax were to be invalidated, the tax reductions would not
• material improvement in tax reduction in this bill.

Bills: SCR8410

Keywords: returning bills to house of origin, sine die, end of session, legislative procedure, Rules Committee, third reading, unfinished business, pending bills, joint resolutions, concurrent resolutions, joint memorials, special session, bill numbering, legislative records, House of Representatives, Senate, Washington Legislature, session adjournment, procedural resolution, 904

Summary: The Senate considered engrossed substitute Senate Bill 6346, a major tax package creating a new income tax on high earners, providing tax reductions and credits, and funding various spending priorities. A point of order was raised that House amendments exceeded the bill’s scope under Senate Rule 66, focusing on new provisions affecting sales and use taxes and business and occupation taxes. The President ruled the amendments were within scope, finding they were tax reductions similar to those already in the Senate-passed bill, and the Senate then took up the motion to concur in the House amendments. Members debated the House changes at length. Supporters said the amendments improved the bill by expanding the Working Families Tax Credit, adding exemptions for diapers and over-the-counter medicines, bringing forward some tax relief, preserving business loss carryforwards, and adding funding or intent language for items such as Fair Start for Kids, K-12 investments, local government replacement funding, and universal school meals. Opponents argued the bill remained unconstitutional or unfair, criticized the income tax structure and inflation indexing changes, objected to the gambling-loss deduction and limits on charitable deductions, and said the bill’s promises on public defense, education, and other priorities were not secured in the body of the measure. On a roll call vote, the Senate concurred in the House amendments by a vote of 27-21, with one excused. The Senate then passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6346 as amended by the House by the same 27-21 vote, and the President signed the bill in open session. The chamber also received several messages from the House announcing signed bills, and then adjourned until the next scheduled meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each of the tax reduction ideas that are in the bill that came over from the Senate, and potentially
• Some of the most difficult reductions are the ones that we can start by reevaluating.
• The end product is going to be somewhere between 25 and 40% of the money going to tax reductions, and
• When we talked about this with the Senate, we thought that they were very high priority reductions.
• We do know that other states that have a commission do see reductions.

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: Senate and House Democratic leaders held a post-cutoff media availability to review the first half of session and outline priorities for the remainder. They said both chambers made substantial progress on protecting Washington from federal overreach and on affordability, citing measures on ICE access and notice, private spaces, housing expansion, medical debt interest caps, senior property tax relief, working families and small business tax credits, and proposals to phase out sales tax on services. They also highlighted that the House moved nearly 200 bills, about 80% with bipartisan support, and said the chambers are now processing each other’s bills and preparing for a fast-paced final stretch. A major focus was the “millionaire’s tax” and related tax relief proposals. Leaders said the governor’s suggestions, including a sales tax holiday and diaper relief, were welcome and that the updated revenue forecast gives the budget more breathing room and reserves, though much of the new revenue is offset by caseload growth and federal cuts. They said the tax package is intended to support long-term fiscal sustainability and affordability, and that House members will continue shaping the bill in committee. They also discussed a separate proposal to tax large employers whose workers rely on Medicaid, saying it is being considered in light of new federal requirements to track Medicaid employment data, while noting concerns from employers and nonprofits. The conversation also covered several bills that stalled or were delayed. Leaders said the JR bill did not advance because it lacked votes, though support and stakeholder engagement increased this year. They said child welfare bills and Senator Wilson’s proposals were paused after stakeholder concerns, while Representative Fitzgibbon defended the House’s approach to child safety and said lawmakers are still working on the issue. Other topics included the transmission and cultural resources bills, where a late procedural request to read a bill in full disrupted plans to move multiple measures together, and a tort-liability bill that passed the Senate and is expected to continue in the House with amendments. They also addressed the 0.05 impaired-driving bill, the Left Plan 1 pension proposal, the farmworker unionization bill, and the initiative-related bill, with several of these measures described as still under discussion or lacking enough support to move this year.

Transcript Highlights:

• For all publicly funded projects, Cal Fire shall conduct a risk reduction cost per unit.
• You need to be very tailored in the application, and it'd be tailored to community risk reduction.
• Efforts to maximize emissions reductions, especially in our impacted communities.
• So the first thing I would say is that AB 617 SERPs, the community emission reduction plans, there's
• But there are some things in that emission reduction plan that are purely, that are really aspirational

Summary: The committee heard a series of Senate bills on environmental, climate, recycling, wildfire, outdoor access, and clean transportation policy. SB 958 would clarify CEQA treatment of impacts tied solely to increased building height, and SB 1230 would increase penalties and create CalRecycle support tools for repeat commercial illegal dumping. SB 1341 would revise how processing fees are calculated for bag-in-a-box wine under California’s recycling program. All three measures received due-pass recommendations to Appropriations, with roll calls showing majority support and the bills left open for absent members. Members then took up SB 1300, which would create a more permanent legislative role in California’s international climate cooperation and establish a climate secretariat at UC; SB 1370, which would codify and streamline wildfire fuel-reduction permitting with added safeguards, geographic and size limits, and pesticide-related amendments; and SB 1260/1268, which would codify the Outdoors for All initiative and the Deputy Secretary for Access position at the Natural Resources Agency. Each drew support from environmental, utility, business, and local-government witnesses, while SB 1370 also drew opposition from environmental and advocacy groups concerned about reduced CEQA review and herbicide use. The committee discussed amendments at length, especially on SB 1370, and all three measures advanced with due-pass recommendations. The committee also heard SB 1213, the Clean Truck Transparency Act, requiring baseline pricing disclosure for medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission trucks tied to state incentives and directing agencies to explore alternative financing. Support came from clean-air, business, and environmental groups, and the trucking/manufacturing opposition moved to neutral after amendments; the bill advanced on a due-pass vote. Finally, SB 1075, the Clean Air Promise, sought to strengthen AB 617 implementation and clarify community emission reduction planning, but it generated substantial opposition from air districts, business groups, and others over enforceability, funding, and the distinction between formal SERPs and community L-SERPs. The author described additional pending amendments to narrow L-SERP provisions, and the bill also received a due-pass recommendation to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• We want to be partners in VMT reductions and GHG and EMT.
• We want to be partners in VMT reductions and GHG and EMT.
• We in Saint Peter do support reductions in greenhouse gases.
• We've taken a proactive approach toward carbon reduction.
• The requirements for both greenhouse gas emission reductions and offsets, as well as VMT reductions and

Bills: HF4807

Keywords: overweight vehicles, aggregate mining, local ordinance restrictions, legislative audit, transportation, resource inventory, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• But looking at the table that you're showing, there's no doubt that there will be a reduction.
• There's no doubt that there will be a reduction. This is our Ashari's table. But it's fine.
• It's important to note that those decreases are not necessarily tied to reductions.
• They had a $54.4 million reduction, which is 37.2% of their statutory dedicated budget.
• And then a $10 million reduction in federal as their largest... ...then a $10 million reduction in federal

Summary: The committee began a series of House Appropriations budget hearings focused on the fiscal year 2026-2027 executive budget, the preamble, and the executive department. Staff presented revenue and spending trends showing projected declines in revenues alongside increasing expenditures, with members emphasizing the need for a standstill budget and additional efficiencies. The House Fiscal Division also reviewed the FY25 surplus and FY26 excess, the constitutional uses of surplus funds, and the overall FY27 budget structure, including the distinction between discretionary and non-discretionary spending. The commissioner of administration described the administration’s use of one-time money, efficiency reviews, and budget reductions, while members asked about revenue forecasts, the motor vehicle sales tax dedication, corporate tax changes, and the impact of federal policy changes on state costs, especially SNAP and Medicaid administration. The committee then moved through several executive department agencies. The Division of Administration presentation covered its budget, vacancies, debt service, and reductions tied to statewide adjustments and efficiency measures. GOSEP’s functions were described as transferred into the Department of Military Affairs under Act 262 of 2025, and military officials outlined the new combined structure, emergency response duties, overseas deployments, youth programs, and concerns about future federal funding. The Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority reviewed its largely dedicated funding and explained that large apparent balances reflect long-term project planning and multi-year capital work. The Office of the State Inspector General presented a budget increase for consulting services tied to the governor’s DOGE-style efficiency initiative, and the inspector general said the effort had identified nearly $1 billion in savings across the executive branch, largely through eligibility reviews in Medicaid and SNAP and implementation of prior audit recommendations. Members raised questions throughout about how budget figures were calculated, why some totals appeared to rise while state general fund support fell, and how federal changes would affect state agencies. There were also questions about the transition of GOSEP into Military Affairs, the status of school safety centers, and whether the new structure would change local emergency responsibilities. No formal votes or amendments were taken during the portion provided; the meeting consisted of presentations, explanations, and member questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• So there's a 20% reduction from that baseline by 2030 through 2039, 70% by 2040 through 2049, and 95%
• Back to the emissions reduction standard, I just wanted to specify the proposed substitute... ...the
• to be achieved under the plan through any combination of carbon capture and sequestration, waste reduction
• So the emission reduction opportunities, there's a long list there.
• The options to consign some of the no-cost allowances for the use of the EITs for emissions reduction

Summary: The Environment and Energy committee met for executive session on four bills. Staff briefed House Bill 2416, which would replace Climate Commitment Act no-cost allowances for the Spokane waste-to-energy facility with a separate regulatory scheme requiring emissions reductions, reporting to Ecology and Commerce, and enforcement provisions; members discussed whether emissions accounting included biogenic emissions and confirmed the reduction measures would need to occur on-site. House Bill 2537 would direct Ecology to recommend a future allowance schedule for emissions-intensive, trade-exposed facilities and require biennial reporting and periodic plans, while House Bill 2575 would reduce several Energy Independence Act and state energy strategy reporting requirements for utilities and Commerce. House Bill 2322, as amended in a proposed substitute, would delay alternative jet fuel tax incentives until July 1, 2031, remove capacity thresholds, tie eligibility to life-cycle rather than direct emissions, and drop a Clean Fuels Program carbon-intensity change. During executive action, the committee debated the policy impacts of the waste-to-energy bill, with supporters saying the Spokane facility is unique and needs a separate framework, and opponents arguing it would create costly disincentives and raise ratepayer costs. The EITE bill drew support from members who said it would help identify facility-specific decarbonization options, while opponents warned about competitiveness, job losses, and industry leaving the state. The reporting-reduction bill was described as a streamlining measure that would save utilities money and remove duplicative or outdated reports. The alternative jet fuel substitute was presented as a clarification and simplification of the incentive structure, and members praised the changes. All four measures were reported out of committee with due pass recommendations. House Bill 2416 and House Bill 2537 each passed on 12-9 votes, House Bill 2575 passed unanimously by voice vote, and the proposed substitute for House Bill 2322 also passed unanimously by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• ,</c> so on line 93 is the LGA reduction, so on line 93 is the LGA reduction, which<00:21:12.799><c>
• Also, $15 program aid aid reduction.
• I just want to revenue reductions.
• Um, the reduction is $250,000.
• Um, the reduction is $250,000.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all