Transcript Highlights:

• A Bloomberg News analysis of 38 million mortgages found that, controlling for income, loan size, and
• An analysis, in fact, of 37 million mortgage applications submitted between 2018 and 2024 showed that
• I think the committee analysis, as my colleague said, does a great, excellent job of laying out some
• I think the committee analysis, as my colleague said, does a great, excellent job of laying out some
• and the chair for a She's accepted that thank the full analysis and the chair for over five years of

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• procedures, do retraining of all our staff on multiple levels, as well as conducted a root cause analysis
• So our consultant group has done a root cause analysis that we are happy to share with the group.
• It seemed like you mentioned root cause analysis, and that's the first thing: root cause analysis.
• It seemed like you mentioned root cause analysis, and that's the first thing: root cause analysis.
• , and that's the first thing, root cause analysis.

Keywords: 1204, all

Summary: The Joint State Agencies committee met to approve the October 8, 2025 minutes and then held an extended oversight discussion with the Department of Human Services about the death of Zachary Moore at the Southeast Arkansas Human Development Center (later clarified in testimony as the Warren facility). DHS officials described Moore’s background, said he died after being restrained in a prone position for about 13 minutes, and reported that a nurse later administered a chemical restraint before CPR was attempted. They said the agency settled with the family for $725,000, terminated 13 staff members, changed facility leadership, and brought in consultants under a directed plan of correction from the Office of Long-Term Care to review policies, retrain staff, and conduct a root-cause analysis. Later testimony clarified that the death certificate listed the manner of death as homicide and the cause as physiologic stress associated with struggle and prone restraint; committee members also noted that six people had been charged with manslaughter and neglect of a vulnerable person. Members focused on restraint policy, staff training, chain of command during emergencies, family communication, and whether warning signs had been missed. DHS said it has written restraint protocols, annual restraint training, and a mortality review process, but acknowledged that the Warren facility had multiple failures, including use of a prone restraint, improper chemical restraint, poor supervision, inadequate communication, and problems with equipment and behavior plans. Officials said they were revising policies, creating clearer crisis-team roles, and retraining staff, and that the consultant work would be shared across the other human development centers. Several members pressed DHS on why the family had not been kept informed, why the agency was not prepared with basic facts, and whether a more formal independent audit of facilities should exist. The committee also discussed broader staffing and funding issues across the human development centers. DHS said CNAs start at about $39,000 a year, that the centers rely heavily on float and contract staff, and that there are about 2,000 people on a waiting list for services. Members argued that low pay, turnover, and rural staffing shortages contribute to risk and asked for recruitment and retention plans, possible regional pay differentials, and more legislative support. DHS said it is drafting a systemwide retention and recruitment plan and expects to bring it to ALC, while also implementing a separate rate study for certain PASS program services in January 2027. The meeting ended after comments from Zachary Moore’s mother, Angela Stevens, who said money cannot replace her son and urged the state to ensure no other family experiences the same loss; the committee asked DHS to keep members and Ms. Stevens updated on consultant reports and recruitment efforts before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't have time for that today, but the analysis is fine. Thank you.
• of over 6 137,000 you know my analysis of over 6 137,000 groundwater<00:10:01.160> quality<00
• <00:10:06.720> is<00:10:07.000> fine time for that today but analysis is fine time
• for that today but analysis is fine thank thank thank you<00:10:10.120> uh<00:10:10.680> I<
• the reason I economic impact analysis the reason I asked<00:17:36.200> that<00:17:37.200>

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:04 SB 89 Discussion 00:59 SB 89 Roll Call Vote 24:49, 958, all

Summary: The committee met in a special called session, confirmed a quorum, and took up Senate Bill 89. The sponsor, Scott Maiden, said the bill was intended to address permitting issues affecting coal and other industries, and he described it as supported by a broad coalition of business, agriculture, and industry groups. He said the bill would align Kentucky’s definition of “waters of the Commonwealth” with federal definitions and would codify the existing definition and calculation method for long-term treatment bond requirements at mine sites. He also emphasized that the bill would not eliminate groundwater protections, drinking water protections, or prohibitions on hazardous substance dumping. A committee amendment was discussed and adopted to add and clarify definitions, including navigable waters, sinkholes with open drains, certain springs, and wellhead protection areas. The sponsor said the amendment was intended to address concerns that the bill was too broad and noted that it was worked on with Louisville Water and other stakeholders. Testimony in opposition came from Rebecca Shelton of Appalachian Citizens Law Center, who argued the bill would leave private wells and groundwater vulnerable and cited groundwater contamination data. Nick Hart of Kentucky Waterways Alliance urged the committee to preserve the current definition and requested a statutory review and economic impact analysis. Audrey Ernsberger of Kentucky Resources Council said the bill would strip protections from most groundwater, ephemeral streams, karst aquifers, and many private wells, and warned of higher water-treatment costs and pollution risks. Members asked questions about the meaning of “carcinogenic” and the difficulty of cleaning up contamination in private wells. During roll call, several members explained their votes, with supporters saying the amendment protected water while preserving needed flexibility for industry, and opponents saying they could not risk weakening water protections or harming private wells and agriculture. The committee voted to pass SB 89 as amended with a favorable recommendation to the Senate, and then moved to roll the committee amendment into a committee substitute.

Transcript Highlights:

• They could just watch this debate; they could read the Senate analysis.
• They could read the Senate analysis.
• Because that is the constitutional challenge that the staff analysis brought up.
• Since this PCS staff analysis has come out.
• I don’t think I’ve ever read a staff analysis that depicts that.

Summary: The committee took up several bills and confirmations. It reported favorably SB 332, as amended, on a narrow public-meetings/public-records exemption for legal strategy and settlement communications during the pre-suit period in Burt Harris claims; SB 464, requiring K-12 schools to formally observe Veterans Day; SB 984, clarifying firefighter cancer/death-benefit provisions and related prevention language; SB 576, expanding and codifying the local government cybersecurity protection program under Florida Digital Service; SB 964, revising how certain gifts and honoraria are reported to the Commission on Ethics; SB 1612, requiring local governments to accept electronic payments with exceptions and a delayed effective date; SB 830, creating public-records exemptions for certain local government administrators and their families; SB 1096, clarifying the filing deadline for Florida Civil Rights Act complaints; and SB 1656, designating the SS American Victory as Florida’s official state flagship. The committee also considered a large confirmation package. Jeffrey Aaron’s appointment to the Public Employees Relations Commission was discussed separately after Senator Polsky raised concerns about his political connections and prior work; the committee still recommended him favorably. The remaining appointees on tabs 12 through 30 were also recommended favorably in one vote. The longest and most contentious item was SB 1296, with a committee substitute, on the Public Employees Relations Commission and public-sector unions. The PCS would change union certification/recertification rules, require a recent showing-of-interest form, create different voting thresholds for public safety and non-public safety employee organizations, limit paid union leave for non-public safety unions unless reimbursed, require equal access to certain employer communication spaces, and speed up impasse procedures for legislatively funded salary increases. Senators raised constitutional concerns, especially about the single-subject rule and collective-bargaining rights, and many speakers opposed the bill as union-busting and harmful to teachers, bus drivers, nurses, utility workers, and other public employees. Supporters argued it would improve accountability, ensure genuine member support, and prevent taxpayer-funded union activity. The committee continued debate on SB 1296 after extensive testimony, but the transcript ends before a final vote on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• > the<01:10:14.719> training, five, an analysis of the training, five, an analysis of the
• <01:10:21.360> of It would also conduct an analysis of It would also conduct an analysis of
• Uh an analysis of fire retention.
• No, we could probably do some quick analysis on that.
• One some some quick analysis on that.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And our analysis suggests 3-year period.
• that the exercise had had the analysis that the exercise had had the analysis concluded<00:53:49.040
• There would be a different analysis to this.
• There would be a different analysis<01:10:39.400> to<01:10:39.520> this.
• But, all assets in analysis to this.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• With that in mind, the results of any new analysis that we prepare this summer could change later in
• Maybe you could kind of break down that Ice Miller letter to us a little bit, and then any new analysis
• Maybe you could kind of break down that Ice Miller letter to us a little bit, and then any new analysis
• Those will be addressed in an updated actuarial analysis component in the final study.
• So the analysis that we did, if those bills were to move forward next session, we would update those

Summary: The Select Committee on Pension Policy Executive Committee approved the June minutes and received a brief update from Assistant Attorney General Jesse Yoder, who had no litigation updates but offered to answer questions. Actuary Michael Harbour then previewed the September full committee meeting, which will include a report on the financial condition of the DRS-administered pension plans and the state actuary’s recommended economic assumptions. He also cautioned that any actuarial pricing done over the summer could change if assumptions are updated, and suggested taking votes on potential legislation later in the interim, possibly in November or December. A discussion followed about the Left 1 benefit improvement and where the funding came from. Harbour said the benefit tied to SSB 5791 (2022) was paid from the Left 1 trust fund, while a separate Left 2 benefit improvement was in SHB 1701, and he agreed to double-check the issue with DRS after members raised conflicting information. Members then discussed the broader Left 1 study, including whether IRS approval is a key barrier and whether options are limited to merger or closure. Several members asked to hear from Ice Miller, which has been advising on the tax issues, and staff said the committee should receive a written response in the next couple of weeks and could have Ice Miller appear in October. The committee reviewed and adjusted its interim work plan. September will include the actuarial presentations, a more detailed Left 1 study update, and a presentation on PERS and TERS Plan 1 COLAs, including a recap of the bill recommended this year and initial considerations for an ad hoc COLA. October is expected to include DRS administrative and performance updates, with November reserved for the State Investment Board update and a final Left 1 study update, and December may include an educational presentation on excess compensation. Members also requested a future briefing on the month-of-death benefit discussion. The September agenda was adopted, correspondence materials were noted, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• employers uh we did update that analysis employers uh we did update that analysis so<00:22:11.360
• <01:12:20.000> that program uh I you have some analysis that program uh I you have some analysis
• <01:16:55.639> on which is what we uh base the analysis on which is what we uh base the analysis
• <01:19:49.960> was calculation so the analysis was calculation so the analysis was essentially
• I appreciate the quick turnaround and the detailed analysis."

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We need advanced data analysis to detect red flags and anomalies.
• Since I've better is data analysis.
• We do our own data analysis. Right. DHS.
• <00:31:21.120> also<00:31:21.360> partner analysis inhouse, but we also partner analysis
• engage with on data analysis projects. engage with on data analysis projects.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• To fulfill this constitutional mandate, DLNR must perform this economic analysis.
• but I I don't know this kind of analysis but I I don't know that<01:32:31.800> I<01:32:31.960
• they were to take on this analysis they were to take on this analysis they're<01:32:36.159> going
• Um, because I think that's also of a concern. ...would be the analysis would be based upon the zoning
• <01:40:05.199> maybe help uh for some of this analysis maybe help uh for some of this analysis

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Public Safety met on March 21, 2025, and heard several resolutions related to corrections, emergency preparedness, and wildfire risk. Early items included HCR 62/HR 57 on flying the National League of Families POW/MIA flag year-round at the state Capitol, for which no one testified, and HCR 154/HR 49, which would request a comprehensive forensic audit of DCR and DAGS spending tied to planning and building a new jail to replace the Ahu Community Correctional Center. The ACLU strongly supported the audit, arguing that the state has spent millions on jail planning over many years without clear accounting, that a new jail is unnecessary and fiscally irresponsible, and that public-private partnership arrangements could reduce transparency. Committee members questioned the use of the term “forensic,” the age of some cited allegations, and whether the auditor could instead conduct another type of audit; the ACLU said it was open to other audit language and offered to help compile background materials. No vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee also heard HCR 63, asking DCR to provide separate clinical counseling services for correctional staff, with one supporter, and HCR 23, which asks DCR to include circuit and district court facilities in planning the new Ahu Community Correctional Center and to establish a release procedure that avoids releasing detainees into residential communities or public spaces. DCR Director Johnson said the department supported the intent of HCR 23 and had discussed it with the Chief Justice and court administrator, adding that one multi-purpose courtroom could handle both district and circuit proceedings. The chair then moved on without further discussion. A major portion of the meeting focused on HCR 37, which asks HEMA to work with other agencies on outreach and preparedness for kūpuna. Testifiers from the Pearl City Neighborhood Board, AARP Hawaii, and the Hawaii Council of Community Associations supported the measure, citing the vulnerability of older adults and people with disabilities during disasters, lessons from the Lahaina fires, and the need for clear evacuation plans, siren reliability, and better coordination with care homes and condominium associations. Several speakers described local preparedness efforts and concerns about gaps in communication and implementation. The committee also discussed HCR 69/HR 62 on creating a vegetation management working group to reduce wildfire risk; the Division of Consumer Advocacy supported it, with testimony describing dangerous incidents involving vines and bamboo contacting electrical lines and causing sparking and a utility pole fire. The meeting ended with testimony and questions continuing on that topic, and no final committee action was shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• federal needs analysis to 95%. federal needs analysis to 95%.
• <00:57:39.119> And<00:57:39.359> then of the federal needs analysis.
• And then of the federal needs analysis.
• For independent students with analysis.
• Minnesota is measuring needs analysis Minnesota is measuring needs analysis higher<00:58:55.920>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• One, what we're showing in a scenario analysis is not intended to be a forecast.
• That is not what this scenario analysis is intended to do. It's not a forecast.
• that is not what this scenario analysis that is not what this scenario analysis intended<00:23:30.320
• <00:24:28.799> that purposes of this scenario analysis that purposes of this scenario analysis
• So this, what you're seeing here on this slide, is our scenario analysis.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Steptoe produces and provides analysis for its weekly program, Inside Texas.
• She also writes for the station's website and offers in-depth analysis on WFAA's digital political program
• Can request expanding their ability to conduct in-depth analysis of grid reliability and resource adequacy
• 17 under Rule 4, Section 32, on the grounds of the background and purpose statement in the bill analysis
• Data, in analysis, in intelligence that is at the national level, national security level.

Bills: SB17, SB1569, SB2420, HB5138, HJR161, HB1937, HB3334, HB5444, HB5137, HB361, HB321, HB5447, HB464, HB678, HB2294, HB4172, HB3225, HB1769, HB5394, HB1837, HB1787, HB2271, HB2440, HB5134, HB5149, HB2151, HB2073, HB2186, HB2025, HB1936, HB1777, HB1663, HB 1306, HB 1290, HB1527, HB4802, HB3462, HB2963, HB2462, HB2560, HB644, HB2725, HB2621, HB2588, HB1443, HB1403, HB3032, HB1557, HB1664, HB2811, HB2088, HB2598, HB3062, HB3134, HB3940, HB4027, HB4097, HB4862, HB4170, HB4157, HB4205, HB4279, HB4377, HB4838, HB5424, HB5294, HB4870, HB4763, HB5639, HB4112, HB2275, HB1677, HB5014, HB3848, HB3797, HB3727, HB3709, HB3177, HB3057, HB4176, HB4202, HB2180, HB3528, HB3658, HCR76, HCR127, SB906, SB1229, SB855, SB703, SB1025, SB888, SB1119, SB1080, SB929, SB1355, SB2231, SB1877, SB1998, SB552, SB17, SB1569, SB2420, HB2697, HB3801, HB3488, HB3477, HB3466, HB3469, HB2594, HB2564, HB2298, HB5331, HB5646, HB5247, HB5323, HB4384, HB3896, HB4014, HB3627, HB3594, HB2524, HB510, HB561, HB 1181, HB3963, HB5111, HB2785, HB1661, HB200, HB1803, HB249, HB721, HB851, HB 1128, HB1904, HB30, HB1916, HB541, HB5560, HB3071, HB5627, HB5435, HB2688, HB3045, HB3483, HB4213, HB4226, HB783, HB175, HB4735, HB5155, HB5057, HB4813, HB5339, HB5196, HB5033, HB3486, HB4211, HB74, HB4730, HB4743, HB4463, HB4139, HB4752, HB4486, HB4437, HB4426, HB4396, HB4263, HB3487, HB3418, HB2266, HB2229, HB2189, HB5224, HB5195, HB3947, HB3358, HB3370, HB3745, HB3697, HB2001, HB1968, HB3371, HB3909, HB4944, HB2284, HB4506, HB3317, HB4166, HB3913, HB1768, HB4603, HB2494, HB3099, HJR138, HB133, HB3832, HB1988, HCR34, HB3421, HB3892, HB5138, HJR161, HB1937, HB3334, HB5444, HB5137, HB361, HB321, HB5447, HB464, HB678, HB2294, HB4172, HB3225, HB1769, HB5394, HB1837, HB1787, HB2271, HB2440, HB5134, HB5149, HB2151, HB2073, HB2186, HB2025, HB1936, HB1777, HB1663, HB 1306, HB 1290, HB1527, HB4802, HB3462, HB2963, HB2462, HB2560, HB644, HB2725, HB2621, HB2588, HB1443, HB1403, HB3032, HB1557, HB1664, HB2811, HB2088, HB2598, HB3062, HB3134, HB3940, HB4027, HB4097, HB4862, HB4170, HB4157, HB4205, HB4279, HB4377, HB4838, HB5424, HB5294, HB4870, HB4763, HB5639, HB4112, HB2275, HB1677, HB5014, HB3848, HB3797, HB3727, HB3709, HB3177, HB3057, HB4176, HB4202, HB2180, HB3528, HB3658, HCR76, HCR127

Keywords: foreign ownership, real property, national security, criminal penalties, civil penalties, personal information, higher education, privacy protection, governing board, institutional security, software applications, mobile devices, age verification, parental consent, data protection, app store regulation, HJR 161, Texas constitutional amendment, voting rights, non-citizen voting

Transcript Highlights:

• I think now you've asked me to go deep into legal analysis that's beyond my scope.
• I think now you've asked me to go deep into legal analysis that's beyond my scope.
• I have not done any analysis of compactness.
• Oh. ...analysis or his only answer to that question in committee.
• And then the United States Census Bureau provides on a three-year basis an analysis of this.

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If we have a sunrise analysis for additional mammograms, would that comply with 45?
• Do you know whether or not the State Auditor looked and did a sunrise analysis on this yet?
• If we have a sunrise analysis for additional mammograms, would that comply with 45?
• Do you know whether or not the State Auditor looked and did a sunrise analysis on this yet?
• analysis if we have a sunrise analysis analysis if we have a sunrise analysis for<00:29:48.120><

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee opened its first hearing of the 2025 session with procedural instructions about testimony limits, Zoom participation, written testimony, and a reconvening date if needed. It then heard SB 200 on speedy trials. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing it could create conflicts of interest for prosecutors, potentially make victims or witnesses quasi-parties to criminal cases, force traumatizing testimony on continuance motions, and unfairly delay trials for in-custody defendants. A World Care representative supported the bill and urged broader protections for minors, disabled people, and seniors. The chair also pressed the public defender to suggest improvements, emphasizing that the bill was driven by victims and families. No vote or final action was taken on SB 200. The committee next took up SB 8 on jury duty exemptions for health professionals. Testimony was strongly supportive from nurses, physicians, and disability advocates, who said APRNs and other nurses are in short supply and that jury service can disrupt patient care, especially in rural and neighbor island areas. One witness suggested expanding the exemption to include registered nurses as well as APRNs, while a senator raised concerns about blanket exemptions for non-practicing APRNs and suggested a time limit. The bill remained under discussion with no final action reported. The committee then heard SB 144 on chiropractic, with the state chiropractic board offering comments and the Hawaii State Chiropractic Association supporting the measure as a way to address workforce shortages and provide students more hands-on clinical experience. A World Care witness also supported the bill after clarifying her remarks. The chair then moved to SB 107 on medical informed consent, where the Hawaii Medical Board opposed the bill and the Healthcare Association of Hawaii and Queen’s Health System offered comments, citing concerns about duplicative standards. A support witness proposed expanding the bill to better address combined mental and physical health conditions. Finally, SB 189 on breast cancer screening drew support from the Hawaii Medical Association, Hawaii Radiological Society, Queen’s Health Systems, and others, while the Insurance Division raised concerns about possible insurance mandate defrayment and the need for a sunrise analysis. Senators also asked about local demographic data and coverage impacts; the chair indicated decision-making would be deferred to another day.

Transcript Highlights:

• I like the first analysis better, but I think we can work something out here, so I'm not asking that
• So the chair or the ledge analysis clarified that there are still pesticide and herbicide regulations
• Analysis through paralysis. CEQA is like, again, I'll say it again, aspirin. Like aspirin.
• We recognize it's not a full CEQA analysis that the opposition is looking for.
• First, I would like to begin by accepting the amendments proposed in the committee analysis.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 36 appropriations, and the projects that follow under this category primarily involve collection, analysis
• 36 appropriations, and the projects that follow under this category primarily involve collection, analysis
• collection category um primarily involve collection category um primarily involve collection analysis
• mapping<00:27:13.399> and<00:27:13.600> dissemination<00:27:14.360> of analysis
• mapping and dissemination of analysis mapping and dissemination of foundational<00:27:15.240> data

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So what all went into that risk analysis, and is it the appropriate level based on the risk analysis?
• So what all went into that risk analysis and is at the appropriate level based on the risk analysis,
• So when you talk about the child care, you know, legislative counsel, you've got your analysis.
• And I think cost-benefit analysis is first and foremost.
• We don't have any cost-benefit analysis.

Summary: The task force first approved the March 25, 2026 minutes as amended, including a correction removing language that suggested the auditor’s office would contract with a security vendor. Members then moved to a bill draft on concessions (LC 27.0161.00000), which would raise the competitive solicitation threshold from $25,000 to $50,000, allow requests for proposals in addition to bids, clarify that proceeds go to the entity’s operating fund or general fund, and make other technical updates. OMB explained the draft and answered questions about scope, fragmentation, vendor restrictions, school districts, and whether concession proceeds could be directed to nonprofits; OMB said the draft could be refined further, including clarifying covered entities and contract length. No vote was taken on the draft during the discussion. OMB also reported on other survey items. It said a proposal to broadly allow agencies to create pre-qualified architect/engineering/land surveying vendor pools would not move forward, because the existing authority is working well for the agencies that already have it. On legal notices, OMB said it has been working with the North Dakota Newspaper Association on modernization, including an ADA-compliant online notice system and possible statutory updates to reflect changing technology and notice definitions. On click-through agreements for routine IT purchases, OMB and the Attorney General’s office said policy clarification—not statutory change—was enough, and the $20,000 threshold was intended to distinguish low-dollar adhesive contracts from purchases where terms can be negotiated. The committee also heard that OMB and the Center for Distance Education had resolved questions about alternate procurements and food/beverage expenditures through existing policy, so no statutory changes were needed there. North Dakota University System representatives gave a brief update on ongoing collaboration with OMB on statutory efficiency ideas, including concessions and surplus property. Finally, the task force discussed a draft on requirements for new or expanded spending programs, which would require agencies to identify purpose, expected benefits, alternatives, success measures, and full implementation costs, and would require reporting on outcomes over time. Members debated whether OMB or Legislative Council should collect and report the information, how to use the new program evaluators, whether real-time dashboards should be used, and how to choose which programs to evaluate; staff from Legislative Council said they would work with OMB and the auditor’s office to revise the draft and process.

Transcript Highlights:

• We prepared this analysis at the request of Spaceport America.
• Next, in terms of our track record, again, we're all about economic analysis.
• Cost analysis, as well as strategic plans.
• Is raising, we will have to do a broader analysis beyond those three main sources.
• So it would involve kind of like another layer of analysis to be able to answer that.

Transcript Highlights:

• The types of analysis that credit card companies would do. Let's look for trends.
• So this slide contains information about the shared responsibility for Medicaid data analysis.
• DHS does our own data analysis in-house, but we also partner with external vendors.
• We also rely on the investigative and data analysis capacities of our Medicaid managed care partners.
• On the slide, it mentions an external gaps analysis.