Video & Transcript : 'wages' :

Page 52 of 273
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Relations Act to establish court interpreters as employees and allow them to collectively bargain over wages
  • Relations Act to establish court interpreters as employees, allowing them to collectively bargain over wages
  • While spoken language interpreters are able to negotiate terms related to wages, working conditions,
Summary: The Assembly Judiciary Committee heard several bills, with AB 1827 by Assemblymember Chen proposing to raise the small claims court limit for small businesses from $6,250 to $15,000 and allow up to three filings per year. The author and supporters from the California Association of Collectors said the change would help small businesses recover unpaid invoices and minor contract disputes without costly civil litigation, while preserving the informal small claims process. The committee noted some Judicial Council concerns, but there was no opposition testimony, and the bill later passed out of committee to Appropriations. The committee also heard AB 1916 by Assemblymember Lee, which would include American Sign Language interpreters in the Trial Court Interpreter Employment and Labor Relations Act so they can participate in collective bargaining like other certified court interpreters. Supporters, including the California Federation of Interpreters and court interpreters, described recruitment and retention problems, limited representation, and a shortage of ASL interpreters in the courts. Members expressed support for improving representation and access for deaf and hard-of-hearing court users, and the bill passed to Appropriations. AB 1977 by Assemblymember Irwin, presented by Assemblymember Pacheco, was described as a technical cleanup bill for California’s remote online notarization law, correcting ambiguities and conforming provisions to help the Secretary of State implement the program. The Secretary of State’s office supported the measure and said it would clarify procedures and digital seal authentication, while members raised questions about platform and renewal fees and one concern about a fee for terminated sessions; the sponsor indicated that provision could be removed. The bill was approved and sent to Appropriations. The committee also adopted a consent calendar containing several other bills and later established quorum to take recorded votes before adjourning.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/20/2026 - House Floor Session

Arizona House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Minimum wage. HB 2296. HB 2293. Public Policy. HB 2294. Occupational. HB 2295. Minimum wage.
  • Earned wage access. HB 2310. Qualified market. Commerce. HB 2316. Middle school student. HB 2320.
Summary: The House convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, approved the journal, and recognized the Doctor of the Day, Dr. Tammy Penhollow, a board-certified anesthesiologist, pain medicine physician, and Navy veteran. Members also introduced several guests in the gallery, including school board members and representatives from Republic Services, which was highlighted for its Arizona operations, employment, and sustainability work. Attendance was recorded at 57 present, zero absent, and two excused. The main floor business consisted of reading a large number of bills and resolutions for first and second reading and referring first-read measures to committee. The measures covered a wide range of topics, including public safety, education, health and human services, water and natural resources, commerce, taxation, housing, transportation, artificial intelligence, abortion-related issues, firearms, labor, and appropriations. No substantive debate or votes on individual bills were taken during this portion of the session. Toward the end of the meeting, members made committee announcements and birthday wishes, including a birthday greeting for Representative Aaron Márquez. Committee schedules were announced for Commerce, Education, Natural Resources, Energy and Water, Government, Judiciary, Ways and Means, and others. The House then adopted a motion to adjourn until 1:15 p.m. on Wednesday, January 21, 2026.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (04/08/2025)

Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><02:18:59.840><c> which</c> duplication of payment of wages which duplication of payment of wages
  • When you're out on workers' comp, workers' comp is paying you wages.
  • </c><02:29:57.439><c> When</c><02:29:57.680><c> you're</c> comp is paying you wages.
  • When you're comp is paying you wages.
  • Uh, occasionally employers do do wages.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, March 19, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> less than minimum wage, which is true. less than minimum wage, which is true.
  • Two ways wages go up. Inflation, class. Two ways wages go up.
  • You invest Wages go up by productivity.
  • It raises wages when designed correctly.
  • And with that, I yield back. model that grows wages and grows the model that grows wages and grows the
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 4/7/25

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Partial wage replacement.
  • Partial wage replacement. downturns. Partial wage replacement.
  • </c> related programs there's combined wage related programs there's combined wage so<01:10:18.640><c
  • wages assistance, supplemented Lost wages assistance, supplemented benefits<01:16:15.440><c> in</c><
  • Lost Wages Assistance ran through fall of 2021.
Keywords: 1183, house
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

LBT Informational Briefing 01-12-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So we do pay them higher than the minimum wage.
  • And so, the wages that they earn, Uncle Sam and the state take out their share.
  • So we do pay them higher than the minimum wage.
  • And so, the kids we the minimum wage.
  • And so, and the wages own is not free.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Jobs and Economic Development - 03/12/25

Jobs and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • For every dollar invested by the state for wage reimbursement, private employers contribute $322 in wages
  • For every dollar invested by the state for wage reimbursement, private employers contribute $322 in wages
  • And again, we think we have information that is more beneficial, so we already track wage detail and
  • 01:19:20.840><c> uh</c><01:19:20.960><c> short-term</c><01:19:21.560><c> work</c><01:19:21.920><c> wage
  • </c><01:19:22.360><c> change</c> exit uh short-term work wage change exit uh short-term work wage change
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 03/12/26

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • the good pay and great benefits, but after 25 years of underfunding by the state of Minnesota, our wages
  • When bargaining, the district comes to the table, says this is your budget, wages or health insurance
  • </c><00:16:02.160><c> benefits</c><00:16:02.720><c> have</c><00:16:02.840><c> not</c> our [snorts] wages
  • </c> wages or health insurance. wages or health insurance.
  • > insurance,</c><00:16:14.720><c> but</c> Not everyone takes the insurance, but everyone takes the wages
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

2026 Legislative Session - Day Thirty Five - Tuesday, March 10 - Morning Session

Missouri House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • “And you won’t even increase their living wages.
  • That we're going to make you more successful by changing entry wages, by modulating sales tax.
  • And if people aren't doing that, the system is so ready against them to escape poverty in wages alone
  • And then they have wages in their pockets, whether they're employees or independent contractors.
  • I've got a report in front of me that says the average wage of a worker in Missouri.
Summary: The Missouri House met with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the prior House journal, and numerous guest introductions, including a tribute to Harris-Stowe State University President Dr. Latanya Collins-Smith during Women’s History Month. The chamber then took up House Committee Substitute for House Joint Resolutions 173 and 174, which would place on the ballot a constitutional change to gradually eliminate Missouri’s individual income tax and allow the legislature to broaden the sales tax base to services if needed. The sponsor and supporters framed the proposal as a long-term tax reform that would let Missourians keep more of their earnings, spur economic growth, and ultimately let voters decide the state’s tax structure. Supporters argued that no-income-tax states have stronger growth, more business relocation, and better population trends, and said the resolution includes triggers and revenue-neutral safeguards, including protections for school funding and local governments. Several members said the measure is only a referral to the voters, not an immediate tax change, and emphasized that the plan is designed to phase out the income tax only as state growth allows. Opponents countered that the measure would ultimately require a large sales tax increase on goods and services, shifting the burden onto working families, seniors, renters, and low-income Missourians, while threatening public schools, services, and tax-credit-supported nonprofits. They also criticized the ballot language as misleading and warned that the fiscal impact could be as high as an $8.5 billion revenue loss. Members debated comparisons to Tennessee, Texas, Florida, Washington, Oregon, and Kansas, with supporters citing those states as evidence that lower or no income taxes can attract growth, while opponents said Missouri’s economy, tourism, and budget structure are not comparable and that the Kansas example shows the risks of tax-cut experiments. The sponsor and several allies repeatedly stressed that the proposal is a constitutional amendment for voters to decide, not a final legislative tax hike, and said the plan is different from Kansas because it uses triggers and a defined path to zero. The transcript does not show a final vote on the resolution in the excerpt provided.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Water and Natural Resources Aug 18th, 2025

Water & Natural Resources Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • able to set their own price in the approved supplier program, ensuring the ability to earn a living wage
  • Interns must be paid at least minimum wage.
  • And so it just probably kind of depends on what the hourly wage is, those sort of factors.
  • Labor shortages, wage pressures, and funding in New Mexico.
  • Wages are not competitive with other industries.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Um people who are, you know, lower-wage workers just have really immense challenges.
  • Um people who are, you know, lower-wage workers just have really immense challenges.
  • Um people who are, you know, lower-wage workers just have really immense challenges.
  • Um people who are, you know, lower-wage workers just have really immense challenges.
  • Um people who are, you know, lower-wage workers just have really immense challenges.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: House File 18 was taken up in committee, with the chair noting a preference to hear testimony from people who had traveled farther before hearing from lobbyists or other local witnesses. Representative Engan presented the bill as a family-support measure that would exempt certain infant care items from sales tax, arguing that the cost of raising children has risen sharply and that the bill would provide immediate relief to parents. He cited examples of potential savings on cribs, mattresses, strollers, and baby bottles, and said he was open to expanding the list of covered items. Chair Gomez offered a DE1 amendment that would replace the blanket sales tax exemption with an expansion of Minnesota’s child tax credit, arguing that the child-rearing cost burden is better addressed through targeted assistance rather than a broad exemption that could also benefit higher-income purchasers. After discussing the policy differences and the fiscal impact, Gomez withdrew the amendment. Members then asked questions about the bill’s scope, whether luxury items should be excluded, and why the exemption was limited to baby items rather than older children’s needs. Engan said he would be open to excluding luxury items and to discussing broader expansions, including school supplies. The committee then heard testimony in support from Sarah Gangelhoff of the Women’s Foundation of Minnesota, who said the bill would help families facing high housing, food, and child care costs and would especially benefit women and single-mother households. Maggie Hanggi of the Minnesota Catholic Conference also supported the bill, saying the tax relief could help families afford essential infant items and reduce fear for prospective parents. Members raised concerns about whether tax exemptions effectively reach the families most in need, with one member noting that low-income families may not even be in a position to shop for these items; Engan responded that the savings would still be real for those who do purchase them. No final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Health Committee Jun 16th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Other union workers I talked to are making a minimum wage.
  • And something that happens a lot: there's no stability with their wages and hours.
  • spoke to workers who were working for the same employer for 29 years and were still making a minimum wage
  • Twenty-nine years, still making minimum wage, $16.90 in San Rafael.
  • of Health Care Services to prepare an annual report to the state for employers who are paying low wages
Summary: The Assembly Health Committee heard several bills focused on mental health access, preventive care, health care costs, detention oversight, and daylight saving time. SB 989 would streamline Care Court referrals by allowing first responders to ask county behavioral health agencies to review and file petitions; supporters, especially firefighters and families, said the current process is too burdensome, while Disability Rights California and other opponents argued Care Court is coercive and unproven. SB 1089, as amended, would direct CalRx/HHS to help distribute GLP-1 medications more broadly and more affordably; the author described her own experience with the drugs, and the bill drew support from medical and life sciences groups with no opposition. SB 1309 would eliminate out-of-pocket costs for medically appropriate lung cancer screening follow-up care; cancer advocates and survivors strongly supported it, while health plans and insurers opposed it as costly and said the bigger problem is low initial screening rates. The committee also heard SB 1284, which would require DHCS to report large employers whose workers are enrolled in Medi-Cal and estimate taxpayer costs, framed by supporters as a transparency measure about corporate reliance on public coverage. SCR 7, urging permanent standard time for health reasons, passed with support from medical groups and no opposition. SB 995, the Masuma Khan Justice Act, would create statewide inspection and enforcement standards for large involuntary residential facilities, including private immigration detention centers and certain youth facilities; supporters cited unsafe and inhumane conditions, while county probation officials objected to duplicative oversight for secure youth treatment facilities. The committee took votes on each measure, and the bills and resolution advanced, with SB 1309 and SB 1284 moving on amended and the others also reported out; the consent calendar was approved as well.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Local Government Committee Apr 29th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • labor standards that are adopted by a city council or board of supervisors, such as local prevailing wage
  • And policies which provide living wages for those who build our homes in California.
  • Labor standards are essential to provide health care and sustaining wages for working families.
  • to address the unique needs of their workforce, and make sure we have safe and sustaining jobs and wages
  • able to use the density bonus concessions to waive these core labor protections, including prevailing wage
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government heard a full agenda of bills covering port procurement, housing litigation, special district audits, cemetery district governance, county discretionary funding transparency, labor standards in density bonus projects, transit planning, and homeowner code enforcement. SB 983 would let the Port of San Diego use job order contracting for smaller repair and maintenance work; supporters said it would speed repairs and reduce costs, while opponents raised concerns about construction definitions and project labor agreement language. SB 1256 sought to limit repeated litigation against the Harmony Grove Village South housing project; supporters framed it as a response to duplicative lawsuits delaying housing, while opponents argued it could weaken wildfire and subdivision-map review. SB 992 would make permanent and expand a small special district audit flexibility, and SB 1115 would give Tulare County a narrower way to remove dysfunctional cemetery district trustees rather than taking over the district entirely. Both drew support from county and district representatives, with CSDA opposing SB 1115 but continuing talks on amendments. The committee also considered SB 1193, which would impose transparency and conflict-of-interest guardrails on Alameda County discretionary funding. The author and supporters said the bill responds to grand jury findings and would require clearer public reporting and board approval, while Alameda County argued it already has strong public processes and that the bill is overly restrictive. SB 1383 would clarify that density bonus projects cannot use incentives and concessions to waive locally adopted labor standards; labor groups supported it as protecting worker safety and wages, while housing interests were not present in opposition during the hearing. SB 1361 would prevent local governments from undermining planned transit projects to avoid SB 79 density requirements; LA Metro and labor supported it as protecting transit investment, and the Bay Area Council withdrew opposition. SB 1272, the CASH Act, would give homeowners more time to cure certain non-safety code violations tied to prior owners’ work, with counties and code enforcement groups opposing the introduced version but saying they were working on amendments. Several bills were voted out of committee, many on amended or consent motions, with some remaining on call before later final votes were recorded. SB 983, SB 992, SB 1115, SB 1193, SB 1256, SB 1383, SB 1361, and SB 1272 all ultimately received committee approval, while the consent calendar bills SB 1187 and SB 1388 were also adopted. The chair repeatedly noted ongoing negotiations on several measures, especially SB 983, SB 1193, and SB 1272, and members emphasized wildfire safety, transparency, and labor protections as key issues during debate.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Local Government Committee Apr 29th, 2026

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • labor standards that are adopted by a city council or board of supervisors, such as local prevailing wage
  • for those who build our homes in California. ...and policies which provide living wages for those who
  • Labor standards are essential to provide health care and sustaining wages for working families.
  • to address the unique needs of their workforce, and make sure we have safe and sustaining jobs and wages
  • able to use the density bonus concessions to waive these core labor protections, including prevailing wage
Keywords: 987, senate, all
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture Apr 27th, 2026

Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • These are not minimum-wage jobs. These H-2B jobs are paid the prevailing wage.
  • These H-2B jobs are paid the prevailing wage, which is now generally set by the Department of Labor.
  • So if you look at the prevailing wage, and that's set by the Department of Labor, working with our Department
  • In other words, that is a minimum wage. Then they are also paid if they can produce more.
  • In other words, that is a minimum wage. Then they are also paid if they can produce more.
Bills: HCR65 , HB512 , HB1194 , SCR23 , SB502
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 23, which would create an Agricultural-based National Security Priorities Task Force to study issues such as Chinese drones, farmland ownership, and other technology-related concerns that could affect farmers and national security. Senator Kathy Stewart said the goal was to avoid unintended consequences in legislation and to bring agriculture stakeholders together. The resolution was moved favorably with no objections. The committee then took up Senate Bill 502 on sugarcane bagasse storage. Supporters, including the sponsor, the Commissioner of Agriculture, and the American Sugar Cane League, said the bill would clarify that bagasse is an agricultural byproduct and would protect storage practices that comply with department best practices from local ordinances. Several residents from St. Martin Parish testified in opposition, saying a large bagasse pile near their homes was out of compliance, created dust and odors, and caused health and property-value concerns. Despite the opposition, the bill was reported favorably with no objections. House Bill 512, by Representative Schamerhorn, would prohibit the manufacturing and sale of cell-cultured food products in Louisiana while allowing university research to continue. An amendment was adopted to make the bill effective only if certain federal court rulings allow such a ban. The sponsor and Commissioner Strain argued the issue is still scientifically uncertain and that the state should avoid costly litigation; the bill was reported favorably with amendments after no objections. House Bill 1194, the Healthy Food Retail Act, was amended to shift food-desert research and mapping duties to the LSU AgCenter, while the financing authority would continue handling grants and related funding mechanisms. Supporters said the bill would improve data on food deserts and help target grocery access in underserved urban and rural areas; some members raised concerns about government subsidies and long-term dependence, but the sponsor and Commissioner Strain said the program is intended as infrastructure support to launch stores, not ongoing operating aid. After debate, the bill was reported favorably with amendments by a 10-3 roll call vote. The committee also reported favorably House Concurrent Resolution 65, which urges federal action to reclassify crawfish-industry job duties as agricultural labor for H-2A purposes; testimony emphasized labor shortages, the impact on crawfish and rice producers, and the need for more legal guest workers. The meeting ended with a brief informational handout on direct marketing and custom slaughter plants and adjournment.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture Apr 27th, 2026

Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • These are not minimum-wage jobs. These H-2B jobs are paid the prevailing wage.
  • These H-2B jobs are paid the prevailing wage, which is now generally set by the Department of Labor.
  • So if you look at the prevailing wage, and that's set by the Department of Labor, working with our Department
  • In other words, that is a minimum wage. Then they are also paid if they can produce more.
  • In other words, that is a minimum wage. Then they are also paid if they can produce more.
Bills: HCR65 , HB512 , HB1194 , SCR23 , SB502
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
  • And some of our federal programs have higher wage rates that need to be paid, which is called Davis-Bacon
  • And so higher wage rates, higher insurance costs... LI-Tech program.
  • And so higher wage rates, higher insurance costs, and also waiting on some trade delays that have been
  • Have you sought an exemption to the wage requirements with HUD? Mr. Chair, no. Why not? Mr.
  • So, on the Davis-Bacon wages that I mentioned, I have not seen a waiver, but you are right: there are
Summary: The Senate Committee on Director Nominations met to consider Ruby Dylan Williams for Director of the Arizona Department of Housing. Williams described her long career at the department, her work on operational improvements, housing development, manufactured housing, and efforts to expand supply, preserve existing housing, and improve transparency through data and technology. She also said she would work with the legislature, local governments, tribal nations, nonprofits, and private partners, and emphasized the department’s role in addressing housing affordability and homelessness across the housing continuum. Members questioned her about the department’s response to Auditor General findings, including fraud prevention, payment verification, site inspections, and oversight of grantees. Williams said the department had rewritten policies, retrained staff, added stronger controls, and implemented verbal verification steps for wire transfers after a fraud incident. Senators also pressed her on budget priorities, possible cuts, and her view of homelessness policy, with some members characterizing her approach as closer to shelter or transitional housing before permanent placement. Williams said interventions should be individualized and that the department works with local jurisdictions and service providers to match people with appropriate support. Public testimony was overwhelmingly supportive. Developers, housing industry representatives, and nonprofit partners praised Williams’ private-sector housing finance experience, her knowledge of LIHTC and the QAP process, and her leadership in making the agency more efficient and business-friendly. After debate, the committee voted 3-2 to recommend her confirmation to the full Senate. Two members voted no, citing concerns about her answers on fraud oversight, cost controls, and homelessness policy, while the majority supported advancing her nomination.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/20/2026 - Senate Director Nominations

Director Nominations

Transcript Highlights:
  • And some of our federal programs have higher wage rates that need to be paid, which is called Davis-Bacon
  • And so higher wage rates, higher insurance costs... ...LI-Tech program.
  • And so higher wage rates, higher insurance costs, and also waiting on some trade delays that have been
  • Have you sought an exemption to the wage requirements with HUD? Mr. Chair, no. Why not? Mr.
  • So, on the Davis-Bacon wages that I mentioned, I have not seen a waiver, but you are right.
Keywords: 1182, all
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • It would modernize and standardize Oklahoma's wage garnishment process.
  • This uniform bill would modernize and standardize Oklahoma's wage garnishment process and attempt to,
  • And the purpose of it is, let's say, hypothetically, you get a wage garnishment from an individual and
  • It's difficult to garnish their wages because then you have to comply with Colorado state law.
  • sense with the freedom of movement in today's age that all garnishments, or the process to garnish wages
NM
Transcript Highlights:
  • They create high-wage jobs, expand the tax base, and generate sustained demand for construction across
  • But I also, last one is say, we also have a high-wage jobs tax credit.
  • It could be a quantum facility where you have, again, high capex, high wages, but maybe not as many,
  • The presenter said you can stack the JTIP program with high-wage jobs, you can stack that with an IRB
  • You can stack the JTIP program with high wage jobs. You can stack that with an IRB.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on the committee substitute for House Bill 27, which would modernize New Mexico’s research and development tax credit. Sponsors said the bill would allow the credit to be stacked with industrial revenue bonds for qualifying facilities, exclude data centers and national laboratories, permit up to $50 million in transferable credits per year for 2026-2028, and extend the carry-forward period to seven years. Supporters from business, construction, labor, and economic development groups argued the changes would improve cash flow for startups, help attract and retain high-wage jobs, and encourage commercialization of New Mexico-developed technology in sectors such as advanced energy, aerospace, fusion, and advanced manufacturing. Several witnesses emphasized that the bill was intended to keep commercialization and capital investment in New Mexico rather than losing them to other states. Committee members raised concerns about tax policy, fiscal impact, and whether the bill would truly lead to commercialization. Questions focused on the transferability provision, the $50 million annual cap, who could buy credits, whether data centers should be excluded, how the bill interacts with IRBs and other incentives, and whether the labs could benefit. Some members supported the bill’s goals but worried it was too narrowly tailored or could create winners and losers. The sponsors and administration witnesses responded that the bill was designed to tie R&D to physical infrastructure, provide capital to early-stage companies, and protect the general fund with caps and time limits. They also said the bill would not apply to national labs and would not change existing rural-area doubling provisions. After extensive discussion and no opposition testimony, the committee did not advance the bill. Representative Cadena moved to table the committee substitute for House Bill 27, Representative Parra made the second, and the motion passed without opposition, so the bill was tabled.