Transcript Highlights:

• We are accountable with taxpayers' money, and we stretch every dollar we get.
• We are accountable with taxpayers' monies and we stretch every dollar we get.
• More importantly, we are signing up taxpayers in the future for a much larger bill.
• Right by our taxpayers. I urge you, send a message. Let's not rubber-stamp this.
• But to the extent that they're saying what can happen to taxpayers is offensive.

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, prayer, and pledge, then moved through a long floor session focused heavily on budget trailer bills, labor agreements, housing, environmental review, and several resolutions. Members also introduced visiting guests, including family members, district staff, Mandela Washington Fellows, and UC Berkeley public policy students. Procedural motions were taken up early, including a successful roll-call vote to suspend rules so certain budget-related bills could be heard without reference to file. The chamber approved several major budget measures. SB 129, the labor trailer bill, passed 56-4 after supporters said it made technical budget adjustments, funded collective bargaining, supported In-Home Supportive Services, and addressed pension and project-related issues. SB 131, the public resources and housing trailer bill, passed 50-3 after extensive debate over homelessness funding, CEQA exemptions, advanced manufacturing, high-speed rail, rural access to funds, tribal consultation, and environmental protections; multiple members voiced support while also urging follow-up changes. The Assembly also adopted SB 139, implementing agreements for professional and operating engineers, by 69-1, and SB 140, implementing the correctional officers’ agreement, by 71-0. Later, AB 130, the housing trailer bill, was taken up on concurrence in Senate amendments after a successful rule suspension; members discussed tribal consultation protections, CEQA reform, prevailing wage, and vehicle miles traveled provisions, with debate continuing as the transcript ended. The Assembly also concurred in Senate amendments to AB 927, extending the Williams inspection window for certain school districts, which passed 70-0. In addition, ACR 16 naming the 10th Street Bridge the POW/MIA Bridge passed 70-0. AJR 9, urging full and consistent federal funding for the National Park Service, drew broad bipartisan support and passed 66-0 after members highlighted California parks’ economic and cultural importance. HR 47, recognizing the Fourth of July and the Declaration of Independence, prompted extended remarks on democracy, civics, immigration, military service, and community celebrations before being adopted by voice vote with 64 co-authors added. The consent calendar was also adopted 64-0.

Transcript Highlights:

• Taxpayers don't have to pay for that extra.
• So why is it okay for us, the taxpayers, to pay more for the contract that...
• County, then it's the taxpayers paying the bill.
• So somehow, it doesn't seem like the taxpayers are getting a fair deal.
• And it's ultimately the ratepayers or the taxpayers that do that.

Bills: SB75 , SB715 , SB776 , SB1299 , SB1405 , SB1968 , SB2021 , SB2077 , SB2148 , SB2321 , SB2330 , SB2411

Committee: Senate Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• Taxpayers are demanding accountability. To fix the problem, yet it continues to get worse.
• Businesses and taxpayers deserve transparency, accountability, and restraint.
• Businesses and taxpayers deserve transparency, accountability, and restraint.
• This bill includes several practical pro-taxpayer and pro-business provisions that move California in
• They are passed on to businesses, local government, consumers, and ultimately taxpayers.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill is really about saving us money and making sure we're not wasting the taxpayers' money and
• So this makes the tax forms that taxpayers are already submitting conform with our tax code.
• To various places, including the Bellagio, that was paid for by taxpayer dollars.
• I think this is a transparent and responsible way to use our taxpayer dollars.
• I think this is a transparent and responsible way to use our taxpayer dollars.

Summary: The meeting covered a long series of bills, mostly in health, education, commerce, federalism, and government. In health, members discussed radiology technology updates (HB 2050), a tribal Medicaid waiver/drawdown measure with no state cost (HB 2177), an emergency medicine study committee (HB 2183), fetal death certificate and remains-transfer requirements (HB 2184), a physician assistant licensure compact (HB 2190), dementia care telemonitoring funding (HB 2202), SNAP error-rate reduction and fraud/eligibility oversight bills (HB 2206, HB 2442, HB 2797), child welfare protections like credit freezes and recorded interviews (HB 2321, HB 2322), and podiatric licensure compacts (HB 2438). Several of these were described as consent-calendar items, while HB 2206 and the SNAP-related measures drew discussion about fraud reduction, administrative burden, and work requirements. In commerce and finance, the committee heard bills on mobile food vendors and local permits (HB 2118), earned wage access services with fee caps and disclosure rules (HB 2309), CPA licensure changes (HB 2476), cash acceptance for retail purchases under $100 (HB 2555), drone delivery and unmanned aircraft guardrails (HB 2875), timeshare salesperson licensing (HB 2877), and a prohibition on state-mandated social credit scoring in lending decisions (HB 2903). The tax and retirement-related items included 529 plan conformity and Roth IRA transfer rules (HB 2477), annual tax conformity to the Internal Revenue Code (HB 2785), ASRS technical and disability-related changes (HB 2089, HB 2090, HB 2092), and a bill on employee health insurance definitions (HB 2089). The Arizona Commerce Authority bill (HB 2754) would add legislative members to the board and shift more control over trade offices and Arizona Competes Fund spending to the legislature. The education section focused heavily on school governance and finance. Bills included patriotic youth group presentations in schools (HB 2312), school board term limits (HB 2318), mandatory training for governing board members (HB 2379), independent municipal advisors for bond elections (HB 2320), restrictions on districts buying operating charter/private school sites to game enrollment formulas (HB 2376), conflict-of-interest limits for school facilities board architects and engineers (HB 2378), public meeting and travel transparency rules for districts (HB 2380), limits on long-term school property leases and reporting requirements (HB 2384), tighter bidding rules for school construction job orders using Building Renewal Grant funds (HB 2482), and a voluntary computer science proficiency seal (HB 2764). Sponsors repeatedly framed these as transparency, accountability, and anti-abuse measures, while some opposition centered on local flexibility, housing use, and existing training providers. In federalism and government, the committee heard bills to give counties more time to mail sample ballots (HB 2006), require courts to identify veterans at first appearance for possible veterans court referral (HB 2226), study veterans’ awareness of benefits (HB 2406), broaden military leave protections (HB 2663), require SAVE verification for voter registration and certain state services (HB 2806), require U.S.-sourced voting machine components by 2029 (HB 2901), affirm the Electoral College (HB 2902), and establish due process protections for justice of the peace courts against outside administrative action (HB 2976). Government committee items included a later deadline for library trustees’ annual reports (HB 2129), a two-year limit on certain adult protective services reports to the Attorney General (HB 2228), and an exemption for public and semi-public cold plunges from ADEQ spa rules (HB 2439). Several bills were reported as consent-calendar items, and a number of sponsors noted committee votes, fiscal neutrality, or favorable testimony in support of the measures.

Transcript Highlights:

• Taxpayers are paying for the first by subsidizing harmful products.
• Right now taxpayer dollars are subsidizing the very products fueling our chronic disease epidemic.
• The taxpayers... You said the population in general, what do you... What do you mean by that?
• I heard Representative Emanuel earlier use the word compassion, and it resonated with me because taxpayer
• Poison is not artisanal, and taxpayers should not be forced to fund America's chronic health crisis.

Bills: HB2510 , HB3589 , HB4611 , HB4655 , HB4665 , HB4666 , HB4670 , HB4700 , HB4730 , HB4798 , HB4838 , HB5136 , HB5243 , HB5302 , HB5539

Committee: House Human Services

Keywords: assisted living, healthcare, licensing, criminal offense, personal assistance, group home, regulation, health and safety, inspections, resident care, criminal background checks, adoption, parental rights, registry, vital statistics, disclosure, counseling, foster care, independent living, financial literacy

Transcript Highlights:

• But there should be no formal agreement where taxpayers from New York are carrying out and paying for
• And taxpayers from New York are paying for people from out of state, people who don't live here, don't
• And taxpayers from New York are paying for people from out of state, people who don't live here, don't
• There is more in this bill that protects illegal aliens than it does to protect our legal taxpayers,
• , protect taxpayers, and act as fiduciary agents of taxpayers.

Summary: The Senate opened with routine proceedings, approval of the prior day’s journal, and several motions to restore previously passed bills to the third-reading calendar. Senate Print 2436A, an amendment to the Administrative Code of New York City, and Senate Print 7160, an amendment to the Elder Law, were both reconsidered and restored to the calendar by roll call. Amendments were also received on Senate Print 9960, which retained its place on the third-reading calendar. The chamber then paused to honor Madeline Wilson on her 100th birthday and Marilyn D. Mosley through previously adopted resolutions, with family members and guests recognized on the floor. The Senate also welcomed Columbia Kicks Cancer, a student-run East Greenbush fundraising team that raised more than $239,000 for blood cancer research and care. The Finance Committee reported Senate Print 9005C, a budget bill amending Chapter 268 of the Laws of 1996, directly to third reading, and the Senate accepted the report and the message of necessity. The bill was then taken up on the controversial calendar, leading to extended debate on Part LL, which focused on limits on state and local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, including 287(g) agreements, informal cooperation, masking rules for law enforcement, sensitive locations such as polling places, and the creation of an Office of Immigration Trust within the Attorney General’s office. Supporters argued the bill would keep state and municipal employees focused on their own duties, protect constitutional rights, and prevent New York resources from being used for federal immigration enforcement; they also said it would not bar all cooperation or prevent local police from responding to crime. Opponents argued it would hinder public safety, restrict law enforcement cooperation, and interfere with local discretion, while some raised concerns about constitutional issues and the practical effects on sheriffs, county jails, and police agencies. The debate also included a separate provision creating a civil cause of action for constitutional-rights violations by federal, state, or local officials, which supporters described as an accountability measure. Members further discussed the masking section, with supporters saying it applied broadly to officials and was intended to withstand constitutional scrutiny, while opponents cited a recent Ninth Circuit ruling striking down a similar California law. The Office of Immigration Trust and its complaint/referral process were also examined, including the role of the Governor and the State Education Department in reviewing alleged violations. No final vote on the controversial calendar bill was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Very important for clarification on how much illegal aliens are costing Texas taxpayers.
• Very important for clarification on how much illegal aliens are costing Texas taxpayers.
• They only provide transparency for taxpayers. And I appreciate your vote. Ms.
• I think the Texas taxpayers deserve to know how much that invasion is costing.
• Leaving them in control would save the taxpayers a significant amount of money.

Bills: HB 120 , HB20 , HB150 , HB6 , HB 100 , HB 124 , HB210 , HB215 , HB1393 , HB1587 , HB 1151 , HB 1268 , HB142 , HB451 , HB39 , HB 102 , HB 126 , HB290 , HB300 , HB2143 , HJR2 , HB147 , HJR6 , HB 120 , HB20 , HB150 , HB6 , HB 100 , HB 124 , HB210 , HB215 , HB1393 , HB1587 , HB 1151 , HB 1268 , HB142 , HB451 , SB1

Keywords: career readiness, education reform, workforce training, public schools, financial aid, applied sciences, career education, high school diploma, certificate program, work-based learning, job placement, high-growth jobs, technical training, cybersecurity, state command, information resources, data protection, incident response, mental health, telehealth

Summary: The House convened with prayer, pledges, and several ceremonial recognitions, including Wilson County Day, San Antonio Mission Indian Descendants Day, and Blue Ribbon Lobby Day, along with acknowledgments of visiting groups and a birthday greeting. The chamber also announced committee meetings and then moved into floor business, including conference committee action on Senate Bill 1, the state budget. A series of motions to instruct House conferees on SB 1 were debated and voted on. One motion sought to restore salary for Attorney General Ken Paxton after his impeachment-related suspension; it passed 88-56. Another, from Rep. Olcott, directed conferees to support amendments requiring data collection on the costs of undocumented immigrants in hospitals and prisons; after extended debate and a failed amendment from Rep. Martinez Fischer to also study immigrants’ economic contributions, the motion passed 86-61. The House also adopted instructions to eliminate Texas Lottery Commission funding, to support amendments restricting public education institutions from affirming gender identities inconsistent with biological sex, and to seek an additional $4 billion in property tax relief, with each motion passing on recorded votes. The House then took up a supplemental calendar and passed several bills, including HB 39 on veteran death data, HB 102 on priority registration for certain students entering military service, HB 126 on student-athlete compensation and representation, HB 290 on tuition and fee assistance for members of the Texas military forces, HB 300 on Texas Armed Services Scholarship Program updates, and HB 2143 naming a highway in honor of Army Specialist Joey Lins. The chamber also postponed consideration of HJR 2 and HJR 6. Later, the House considered HB 120 on career and technology education pathways and HB 20 on applied science pathway programs for high school students. HB 120 received a perfecting amendment and was advanced after discussion about workforce preparation. HB 20 prompted extensive questioning about transportation, costs, and how students would access partner campuses such as community colleges and TSTC sites; debate continued as the transcript ended, with members examining how the program would operate and whether approval authority would rest with TEA.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> to them as a taxpayer funded resource. to them as a taxpayer funded resource.
• They are paid for by the taxpayers, and as such we must be good stewards of them.
• They are paid for by the taxpayers, and as such we must be good stewards of them.
• They are paid for by the taxpayers, and as such we must be good stewards of them.
• </c> fraudsters who cheat um our taxpayers fraudsters who cheat um our taxpayers are<01:10:02.840><c>

Bills: HF3643 , HF4470 , HF4462 , HF4366 , HF4172 , HF3629 , HF4356 , HF3093

Committee: House State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Firstly, defining a qualifying taxpayer.
• Firstly, defining a qualifying taxpayer.
• </c> obligation to list a qualifying taxpayer obligation to list a qualifying taxpayer whose<01:14:06.560
• A qualifying a qualifying taxpayer.
• </c><01:15:13.840><c> who</c> would allow that qualifying taxpayer who would allow that qualifying taxpayer

Committee: Senate Taxes

Transcript Highlights:

• And without costing taxpayers a nickel.
• ><c> thrown</c> Taxpayer dollars are being thrown Taxpayer dollars are being thrown overseas<01:11:21.280
• We are accountable to the taxpayers in this state.
• </c><01:17:53.480><c> in</c> We are accountable to the taxpayers in We are accountable to the taxpayers
• c> day,</c><01:36:37.160><c> the</c><01:36:37.240><c> day</c> Taxpayers, today is tax day, the day Taxpayers

Bills: HF3900 , HF1849

Committee: House Rules and Legislative Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• . taxpayers. taxpayers.
• They're stealing money from taxpayers.
• They're stealing money from<00:08:38.200><c> taxpayers.</c> from taxpayers. from taxpayers.
• </c> taxpayers.
• Um and I'm putting taxpayers taxpayers.

Committee: House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Summary: The Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee met to discuss worker misclassification, beginning with approval of the March 4, 2026 minutes and a note that a late-posted bill would not be heard at this time. Chair Pinto opened the hearing by framing misclassification as timely and invited Lea Takapu of the Attorney General’s office to explain the issue. Takapu described misclassification as labeling workers as independent contractors when they are really employees, which can deprive workers of minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, and other protections while also reducing tax revenue. She said the Attorney General’s office and the MEAP partnership have been working on the issue and cited estimates that Minnesota workers lose billions annually and the state loses hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars in revenue, while noting that legitimate independent contracting is not the target. Members questioned how the committee could rely on estimates when the exact number of misclassified workers is unknown. Takapu responded that the figures were based on studies and complaint data, and that underground or undocumented work makes exact counts difficult. Chair Pinto noted the numbers were estimates and referenced a 2024 Legislative Auditor finding that Minnesota lacked an adequate, coordinated approach to proper worker classification, while saying progress had been made since then. Several industry witnesses then testified in support of stronger enforcement. Kevin Pranis of LiUNA said misclassification remains rampant in parts of construction, especially drywall, stucco, thin stone, and broadband installation, and argued it is tax, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation fraud that harms law-abiding contractors and taxpayers. Matt Wollers of Braxton and Sons said his company loses bids to competitors that misclassify workers, creating a labor-cost advantage of 30% or more, and asked for meaningful enforcement rather than new legislation, including regular unannounced jobsite visits. Jesse Madison of Purple Tally Productions said misclassification is anti-competition and described examples from live events and entertainment, urging front-end checks on workers’ compensation, unemployment coverage, and W-2 versus 1099 status before work begins. The next testifier, Ben Ballou of the Minnesota Nurses Association, began his remarks as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't know if the taxpayers should have to pay for this one when they didn't pay for other ones in
• I don't know if the taxpayers should have to pay for this one when they didn't pay for other ones in
• I don't know if the taxpayers should have to pay for this one when they didn't pay for other ones in
• I'm going to comment here for a moment. to ask the taxpayer to foot it, but I to ask the taxpayer to
• dollars nor would it be a good taxpayer dollars nor would it be a good idea.<01:19:16.480><c> This</

Bills: HF3418 , HF3739 , HF3791 , HF3356 , HF3695 , HF3430

Committee: House Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• so the total sales individual taxpayers so the total sales tax<00:19:11.520><c> rate</c><00:19:11.840
• Many of our clients are seniors, immigrants, day laborers, and low-income families—the very taxpayers
• and broad cross-section of taxpayers and serve<01:00:55.720><c> as</c><01:00:56.119><c> a</c><01:00:
• </c> preparation and taxpayer preparation and taxpayer representation<01:01:15.839><c> at</c><01:01:15.960
• who seem to be very taxpayers who seem to be increasingly<01:01:57.880><c> targeted</c><01:01:58.480

Summary: The committee took up House File 2437, the governor’s proposed tax bill, and first adopted the A25-Z42 amendment to put the bill in the desired shape. Commissioner Paul Marquardt of the Department of Revenue then presented the bill as part of Governor Walz and Lieutenant Governor Flanagan’s budget, describing it as a response to budget pressures that would make the tax system more fair and stable while supporting economic development and jobs. Marquardt walked through the bill’s major provisions. These included sustainable aviation fuel policy, repeal of K-12 education credit assignment, elimination of the political contribution refund, expansion of the research and development credit, short-line railroad infrastructure modernization, changes to the state airport fund levy, replacement of attachments and appearances with distribution systems, a narrow personal property tax exception for low-income housing tenants, reduced aquatic invasive species aid, and a 34% reduction in PILT payments. He then focused on the sales tax article, saying it would lower the statewide rate by 0.75% while expanding the base to selected professional services such as accounting, banking, brokerage, and legal services, with business-to-business transactions exempt. He said the proposal would be effective for sales and purchases after September 30, 2025, and estimated a first-year rate-cut impact of about $99 million versus $215 million from the service expansion, while arguing that most households would see a net tax cut. He also noted other changes such as landlord penalty adjustments, a 30% reduction in sustainable aviation fuel incentive payments, repeal of local government cannabis aid, and repeal of the tax filing modernization account. Public testimony began with Kyle Playford of the Financial Planning Association of Minnesota, who strongly opposed the proposed sales tax on professional services, especially financial planning. He argued that financial planning is an essential service for retirement, investment, and long-term financial security, and said the tax would raise costs for consumers, reduce access for middle-class families, small business owners, and retirees, and put Minnesota firms at a competitive disadvantage. The chair then indicated that additional public testimony would continue before member questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Taxpayer protections: unlike the personal lines clearinghouse, which involves taxpayer resources through
• It's about getting taxpayers and limiting their risk.
• It's about getting taxpayers and limiting their risk.
• It’s taxpayer dollars.
• It's taxpayer dollars.

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, and then moved through a lengthy special order calendar. Early business included unanimous passage of CS/CS/SB 1062 on speech and debate education, with supporters describing it as a way to expand access to debate programs statewide, create a Hall of Fame, support public-private partnerships, and train coaches. The bill drew broad bipartisan praise for teaching civics, critical thinking, and conflict resolution, and passed 37-0 after adoption of a delete-all amendment. The Senate also passed SB 1072 on an anti-Semitism task force after clarifying amendment language stating the bill does not restrict criticism of Israel and is consistent with First Amendment protections; members emphasized rising anti-Semitic incidents and the need for recommendations on prevention, law enforcement training, and community relations. The chamber then approved CS/CS/SB 1230 / HB 1019 on PFAS chemicals, phasing out firefighting foam containing PFAS, requiring reporting and biosolid testing, and authorizing DEP rulemaking, assistance, and enforcement; the bill was described as protecting firefighters and water supplies and was dedicated in memory of former firefighter Joe Casello. Senators also passed SB 1706 on the My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program, SB 186 on student health and safety and seizure response training in schools, SB 598 updating funeral and cemetery regulation, SB 990 creating protected cell captive insurance companies, SB 554 modernizing nonprofit corporation law, SB 560 streamlining child welfare and foster care medication procedures, SB 684 on electronic signatures for total-loss vehicles and vessels, and SB 778 on forensic services for certain defendants. Most of these bills were taken up with identical House companions, no amendments, and unanimous or near-unanimous votes. The most extended and contentious debate centered on SB 1134 regarding official actions of local governments and DEI-related activities. Sponsor Senator Yarbrough argued the bill would stop counties and cities from funding or promoting discriminatory or indoctrinating DEI practices, citing examples from several local governments. Multiple amendments were offered, including proposals to narrow the bill to spending, add an intent requirement for penalties, and broaden exceptions for holidays and observances; these amendments were debated at length but were not adopted. The sponsor did accept some clarifying changes, including language protecting certain nonprofit services, heritage resources, and the Pulse Memorial, and he answered questions about Black History Month and at-risk youth services. The transcript ends while the Senate is still working through the amendment process on SB 1134, with no final vote on the underlying bill shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• dollars—whose taxpayer dollars are these?
• </c><04:05:23.319><c> dollars</c><04:05:24.319><c> whose</c><04:05:24.680><c> taxpayer</c> our taxpayer
• dollars whose taxpayer our taxpayer dollars whose taxpayer dollars<04:05:25.800><c> are</c><04:05:26.560
• are these the taxpayers dollars dollars are these the taxpayers dollars they<04:05:29.520><c> are</c
• And it would go back to all of the things we talked about: the burden on our local taxpayer.

Summary: The committee met in executive session on HB 563, which revises the adequacy education grant formula, including differentiated aid for free and reduced-price meals, English language learners, and special education, and also restores fiscal capacity disparity aid. Members explained that for FY 26 the formula largely stays the same with the usual 2% increases, while FY 27 would raise the base cost and several aid categories, including a substantial increase in special education differentiated aid. Supporters said the bill recognizes higher special education costs and separates fiscal capacity disparity from the extraordinary needs grant, which they argued better targets property-poor communities. A major point of discussion was the fiscal capacity disparity aid component. Some members asked for more detail on how the formula affected individual towns and how much money was being allocated. The sponsors said the spreadsheet showed the impacts and estimated the fiscal capacity disparity portion at about $13.3 million, benefiting roughly 40 communities, with Manchester the only municipality expected to receive less under the new approach. They also said the change partially rebalances money that had shifted heavily toward larger cities under the extraordinary needs grant and that the special education increase is new money, not taken from the hold harmless or extraordinary needs funds. Several members supported the amendment as a good-faith step and a bipartisan compromise, while others expressed frustration that they did not have enough time or information to review the spreadsheets in detail before voting. After extended debate, the committee recessed for lunch to allow the spreadsheet to be distributed and reviewed, with the understanding that the bill would continue later in the day and then move on to the other bills on the docket.

Transcript Highlights:

• Total waste of taxpayer money.
• </c> treated. total waste of taxpayer money. treated. total waste of taxpayer money.
• </c> taxpayer. Last year, the Thomas R. taxpayer. Last year, the Thomas R.
• As the GSA and other for taxpayers.
• Instead, it single taxpayer dollar.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:37:55.680><c> Taxpayer</c> This is a privacy issue. Taxpayer This is a privacy issue.
• First, US taxpayers are wins twice.
• :22.479><c> cannot</c> want taxpayer dollars, you cannot want taxpayer dollars, you cannot partner<04
• </c> poverty line have access to taxpayer poverty line have access to taxpayer funded<08:06:02.398><c
• First, the cost to taxpayers incentives. First, the cost to taxpayers is<08:27:44.680><c> enormous.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think it's important to say that Minnesota taxpayers expect that their dollars are going to go
• And I think it's important to say that Minnesota taxpayers expect that their dollars are going to go
• And I think it's important to say that Minnesota taxpayers expect that their dollars are going to go
• lot on internal controls, which I really think are the foundation, the groundwork of making sure taxpayer
• lot on internal controls, which I really think are the foundation, the groundwork of making sure taxpayer

Committee: Senate Human Services

Transcript Highlights:

• Our taxpayers and our support.
• </c> EFA program has already saved taxpayers EFA program has already saved taxpayers more<01:37:01.440
• </c><01:40:14.639><c> dollars</c> diverting millions of taxpayer dollars diverting millions of taxpayer
• That's the taxpayers' expense of taxpayers here in New Hampshire.
• </c> taxpayers for both? Thank you, Mr. taxpayers for both? Thank you, Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• And we think about the county buildings and the city buildings and the jails, all these taxpayer-funded
• <00:12:47.240><c> funded</c><00:12:47.720><c> construction</c><00:12:48.399><c> projects</c> taxpayer
• funded construction projects taxpayer funded construction projects that<00:12:49.000><c> pay</c><00:
• went on but with the change in taxpayers went on but with the change in the<00:54:19.839><c> law</c>
• </c> this uh commitment that our taxpayers this uh commitment that our taxpayers have<00:58:19.799><c

Committee: Senate Taxes