Transcript Highlights:

• Without action, premiums Without action, premiums will rise for families purchasing insurance on the
• Provide premium assistance for individuals who purchase insurance on the exchange at the same level of
• At least At least 20% for subsidies for state-subsidized individual health coverage plans purchased by
• And I was told when I purchased that vehicle that when that battery life expires, to take it back to
• When you go and purchase a new rear differential on a truck or a semi-truck, they always ask...

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So when they go into a store to purchase, what they into a store to purchase, what they into a store
• to purchase, what they purchase might not be defined as purchase might not be defined as purchase might
• these order for them to purchase these order for them to purchase these devices?
• We could afford the upfront purchase it. We could afford the upfront purchase it.
• If to have to purchase a new system. If to have to purchase a new system.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• home rule petition allows Plymouth to thoughtfully manage land use and maintain an account for purchasing
• Allows Plymouth to thoughtfully manage land use and maintain an account for purchasing land for public
• for local control and the direct means for town officials to invest in the Plymouth community by purchasing
• This legislation will give them the ability to devote resources to purchasing land that will benefit

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a public hearing with opening remarks from House Chair Jack Patrick Lewis and Senate Chair Becker-Rouche, who reviewed livestream and testimony procedures and noted the three-minute limit. The committee then heard testimony on several local and policy bills. Boston City Councilor Julia Mejia spoke in support of a Boston home rule petition to expand accountability and oversight, describing it as a way to improve city government and public trust. Falmouth Select Board Chair Robert Muscali testified in support of H.5107 and related bills, emphasizing the urgency of changing the town clerk from elected to appointed before upcoming elections and noting the need for experienced administration. The Animal Rescue League of Boston and MSPCA representatives testified in support of H.4849, a late-filed bill tied to animal control and the implementation of Ollie’s Law. They said the bill would update outdated kennel and dog licensing provisions, allow alternative identification methods instead of requiring tags in kennels, improve reporting and enforcement to MDAR, and strengthen the Massachusetts Animal Fund by allowing partial owner contributions and directing certain fines into the fund. They also said the changes would help address a long waitlist for low-cost spay and neuter services and reduce municipal costs associated with unaltered animals. Committee members asked about the reported three-to-one municipal return on spay/neuter spending and about whether the bill would affect regional animal control arrangements; witnesses said it would not. The committee also heard testimony on H.4887, a Plymouth home rule petition authorizing a special revenue account for land acquisition. Plymouth officials said the measure would give the town a tool to purchase land for open space, recreation, town buildings, affordable housing, and other public uses, supporting the town’s master planning efforts. No votes were taken on the bills during the hearing. After confirming there were no additional witnesses, the chairs closed the public hearing and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• A Realtors report from June of 2025 also indicated that 13% of homes purchased nationally in 2024 were
• ,<00:04:22.440> which<00:04:22.640> included home purchasing, which included home purchasing
• indicated that 13% of homes purchased indicated that 13% of homes purchased nationally<00:05:19.760
• It's not to get at small, you know, two best friends who are purchasing a home together.
• can purchase a home. can purchase a home.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• when we talked through the issue, um, what we found is that the lack of available land, the high purchase
• to to buy land in high purchase to to buy land in Lexington,<00:03:54.480> and<00:03:54.640><
• <00:04:53.440> land capital, um to be able to purchase land capital, um to be able to purchase
• Deon, when they purchased the property, they're holding it interest-free for us.
• <00:43:52.640> those suited to build to to purchase those suited to build to to purchase those

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:07 Roll Call 00:00:25 Discussion of Lexington’s Housing Affordability Partnership 00:02:26 Discussion of Northern Kentucky’s Housing Blueprint 00:30:12 Discussion of Religious Institution Land Use 00:57:33 Discussion of Free-Market Solutions to Kentucky’s Housing Crisis 01:04:18 Adjournment 01:26:37, 958, all

Summary: The committee met without a quorum and began informally, with members noting this was the final information-gathering meeting on housing before a November meeting to discuss findings and report back to the LRC. The main presentation focused on the Lexington Affordable Housing Partnership, a public-private effort supported by a $10 million state allocation. Presenters described Fayette County’s housing shortage, citing a gap of more than 22,000 units, rising home prices, and the challenge of assembling land and capital for affordable projects. The partnership explained that five local banks created a $3 million capital investment fund to buy and hold land at no interest, with deed restrictions keeping the site at 80% or below area median income and allowing the banks to seek Community Reinvestment Act credit. The first project is a 12.5-acre former Transylvania University baseball field, planned for about 242 units, including detached homes, townhouses, garden-style apartments, and senior housing. Speakers said the project required extensive neighborhood engagement and zoning/development approvals, but that the planning phase is now largely complete and infrastructure work should begin soon. Financing details included roughly $64 million in additional funding through tax credit equity, market-rate loans, city support, Kentucky Housing Corporation resources, and donations from nonprofit partners. Developers said the multifamily bond applications are due to Kentucky Housing Corporation the next day, and they expect the land purchase to be repaid into the revolving fund once the property is entitled and closed, allowing the original $3 million to be redeployed for future projects. They estimated rental units could be filled within about six months of completion, while for-sale units would come online over 12 to 36 months. In discussion, members asked about regulatory barriers and project timelines. Presenters pointed to rising construction costs tied to new federal and state requirements, and one member highlighted the need to continue reviewing planning and zoning reforms to speed development plan approvals and reduce delays. The group also endorsed a possible statewide $20 million housing fund, a residential infrastructure fund, and efforts to avoid additional regulatory burdens on housing development.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under current law, the data center exemption is refundable, so qualifying purchases would be sales tax
• um those purchases would be exempt<00:15:40.560> upfront<00:15:41.120> and<00:15:41.240
• Under current Minnesota law, qualifying data center purchases are exempt from sales and use tax.
• Qualifying data center purchases are exempt from sales and use tax.
• Businesses must compile a detailed schedule of qualifying purchases and provide supporting invoices.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• will be liable for the directly assessed repair costs within six months of purchase.
• will be liable for the directly assessed repair costs within six months of purchase.
• These are products that the store purchased. Somewhere else in the city.
• These are products that the store purchased so that community members can shop more easily.
• They spend hundreds of thousands of dollars purchasing new carts every year that can cost up to $500

Bills: HB2015, HB2060, HB2062, HB2100, HB2118, HB2165, HB2258, HB2327, HB2397, HB2445, HB2460, HB2641, HB2745, HB2876, HB2917, HB4011, HB4049, HB4056, HB4087, HCR2013, HCR2016, HCR2040, HCR2044, HCR2048, HCR2056

Keywords: budget procedures, late filing penalty, accounting standards, financial reporting, state appropriations, abortion, educational institutions, health education, state aid, public schools, Buffalo Soldiers, monument, commemoration, Arizona, public funding, Wesley Bolin Plaza, military history, historical memorial, small land subdivision, land use

Summary: The committee approved the minutes from the prior meetings and then took up several measures, beginning with HCR 2013, which would proclaim June 2026 as Celebrate Life Month in Arizona. The resolution drew emotional testimony in support from Crystal Cooper and Bella Stockton, both of whom shared personal stories about living with spina bifida and argued for celebrating life and supporting people with disabilities. Senator Kennedy voted no, saying the resolution was symbolic and did not address practical supports such as paid family leave, health care, housing, and school meals. The committee ultimately gave HCR 2013 a due pass recommendation on a 4-1 vote, with two members not voting. The committee then advanced HB 2327, as amended, clarifying protections for eligible persons’ identifying information in county recorder records and explicitly excluding voter registration records from the confidentiality provisions. Representative Hendricks said the bill was intended to fix problems created by earlier language protecting elected officials and first responders. The committee also passed HB 2258, which adds La Paz County to the Tourism Advisory Council’s geographic area, with no opposition testimony. A longer debate followed on HB 2397, which expands HOA/condominium disclosure requirements for prospective buyers, including bylaws, declarations, plats, meeting minutes, and information about assessments and known defects. Representative Biasucci said the bill was about transparency for buyers, while the Arizona Association of Community Managers raised concerns about cost and the scope of the disclosure requirements; the Arizona Homeowners Coalition supported the bill but opposed an amendment that would require managers to be on site for capital projects. The committee adopted two Hoffman amendments and then gave HB 2397 a due pass as amended recommendation. The committee also passed HB 2015, which imposes penalties on state agencies that miss federal audit reporting deadlines, and HB 4049, which changes how the Attorney General represents DCS in cases alleging misconduct; both drew opposition over concerns about punitive penalties and existing conflict procedures. Later, the committee approved HB 4087, authorizing a memorial plaque for former legislator Barbara Love, and HB 2100, which allows counties to authorize certain small land subdivisions, despite objections that it could weaken water-supply protections. The committee then passed HB 2460, as amended, preempting local ordinances that penalize businesses for abandoned or stolen movable property such as shopping carts; supporters argued cities were charging victims of theft, while cities and towns said the bill would undercut local nuisance enforcement and shift costs to taxpayers. Finally, the committee began hearing HCR 2056, a proposed constitutional referral recognizing a right to refuse medical mandates, with Representative Cooper and supporters framing it as bodily autonomy and opponents warning it would weaken public health protections, especially in schools and during outbreaks.

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:27:42.960> older<00:27:43.279> to<00:27:43.440> obtain,<00:27:43.919> purchase
• ,<00:27:44.320> transfer, or older to obtain, purchase, transfer, or older to obtain, purchase
• that the release of inform the purchaser that the release of 20<00:43:43.680> or<00:43:44.000
• that camp, we would see marine purchased that camp, we would see marine patrol<00:51:07.200> out<
• purchasing and the number<01:31:20.000> of<01:31:20.159> these<01:31:20.560> persons

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of um a firearm safety device purchase of um a firearm safety device um<00:10:41.040> uh<00:10
• This is about safety, encouraging, if you will, those persons that see fit to purchase a firearm that
• they get a break on the sales tax if they also purchase a gun safe, if they purchase a trigger lock
• or transfer is private data. purchase a trigger lock and they have purchase a trigger lock and they
• or transfer of a firearm the purchase or transfer of a firearm safety<00:15:29.759> device<00

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills and a Department of Corrections budget overview. On Senate File 9, Senator Rest explained a bipartisan campaign finance refund bill that had previously moved through the Elections Committee and the tax bill process. Members asked about the $10 minimum contribution threshold for reporting and refund eligibility, and Rest said it was a reasonable number suggested by Senator Karan to make the system more efficient. The bill also included data practices language classifying certain refund-related information as private data, with a separate nonpublic classification noted for receipt validation reports. The committee voted to recommend the bill to pass and re-refer it to the Taxes Committee. The committee then took up Senate File 11, a sales tax exemption for firearm safety devices such as trigger locks and gun safes. Rest described the bill as an extension of prior tax exemptions and clarified that it does not apply to the firearm itself. An A1 clarifying amendment defining “government entity” by reference to statute was adopted. Members discussed the bill’s scope and data privacy language, including a provision making purchase or transfer information private if collected by a government entity. The committee then voted to recommend the amended bill to pass and re-refer it to the Taxes Committee. Next, the committee heard Senate File 456, a bill to update Minnesota’s drug statutes to address fentanyl more directly. Anoka County Assistant County Attorney Sebastian Mesa and Senator Oumou Verbeten testified in support, arguing that fentanyl has become more dangerous than methamphetamine and that the law needs to be updated to give prosecutors a better tool. Members discussed overdose trends and whether more recent statistics were available; one member noted 2023 fentanyl deaths exceeded 1,000, while another said national fatal overdoses had declined since mid-2023. The bill was laid over, with the committee noting it would wait for fiscal analysis before further action. Finally, Commissioner Paul Schnell gave an overview of the Department of Corrections, describing its mission, staffing, prison population, community supervision responsibilities, and budget context. He emphasized rehabilitation, evidence-based practices, reentry support, and the public safety benefits of reducing recidivism. No vote was taken on the department presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• As consumers, why can't we find that information out before purchase rather than after?
• Massachusetts families already adopt responsibly from shelters and rescues or purchase from responsible
• By not considering the effects of the beauty products I was ignorantly purchasing, I was overwhelmed
• I will just mention that we get calls at the MSPCA from people who have purchased sick puppies.
• Over the years, I have purchased five dogs from Massachusetts pet stores.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered a wide range of animal, wildlife, hunting, and environmental bills. Early testimony focused on deer management, with Rep. Markey urging creation of a deer commission to address crop damage, vehicle collisions, and Lyme disease, and Sen. Durant supporting bills to allow Sunday bow hunting, expand crossbow use, and reduce the 500-foot dwelling restriction for archery hunting. Supporters framed these measures as practical wildlife-management tools, while questions centered on how they would differ from existing Fish and Wildlife authority and whether they would allow hunting closer to residences. Later, Rep. Sena also spoke in support of a bill to increase protected wildlife management areas and another to require non-lead ammunition, arguing both would benefit biodiversity and reduce environmental harm. A substantial portion of the hearing addressed animal welfare and commerce. Multiple witnesses supported bills to ban or phase out the retail sale of dogs, cats, rabbits, and guinea pigs in pet shops, arguing that pet stores rely on puppy mills and obscure the source of animals, while opponents said the bills would hurt responsible breeders, small businesses, and consumer choice. The committee also heard strong testimony for bills to ban the sale of cats and dogs in pet shops, with supporters citing sick animals, consumer deception, and the need to cut off the puppy mill supply chain. In a separate animal-testing segment, witnesses backed bills requiring non-animal testing methods for cosmetics and household products, saying alternatives are more accurate and humane; biomedical research representatives opposed those bills and a related research-animal measure, warning of unintended restrictions on research institutions and arguing animal models remain necessary for many studies. The committee also heard testimony on horseshoe crab conservation, with supporters of H. 898 urging an end to taking horseshoe crabs for bait because of population declines, shorebird impacts, and the species’ importance to biomedical science. On wildlife trafficking, witnesses backed bills to ban intrastate sales of ivory and rhino horn, saying Massachusetts should close loopholes that aid poaching and align with federal law and other states; one antique dealer testified in support, saying he avoids such items and still sees them in the marketplace. Additional testimony supported bans on fur products from factory farms and on force-feeding birds for foie gras, with advocates emphasizing cruelty, public health, and environmental concerns. The hearing was lengthy and heavily attended, with the chairs repeatedly limiting testimony to three minutes and inviting written submissions; no committee votes or final actions were taken during the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, we have 6.8 million over the next four years to local food purchasing assistance programs and milk
• <00:22:35.039> assistance local food purchasing assistance local food purchasing assistance
• Just in fiscal year 2025, the federal government canceled $13.3 million to purchase food for schools
• <00:26:25.520> assistance,<00:26:25.919> the local food purchasing assistance, the
• local food purchasing assistance, the LFPA<00:26:26.799> programs,<00:26:27.279> which<

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Relative establishment school cooperative purchasing program.
• So it has the issue dealing with the cooperative purchasing program, which we heard comments, remember
• <00:04:00.480> program with the cooperative purchasing program with the cooperative purchasing
• Uh, the first one is dealing with the school cooperative purchasing program.
• We heard from purchasing program.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In my memo, I state that if a member had purchased service credit under the bill, they would be vested
• With the service credit purchased under the bill, this constituent would have 4 years and 8 months of
• PERA does not have a position opposing the purchase of past service as a remedy.
• <00:35:55.640> an uh past employee to purchase an uh past employee to purchase an additional
• Senator French, Representative Steer, the actual purchase of the past service is again not a concern

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:57:08.960> agreements about why power purchase agreements about why power purchase agreements
• allowing power purchase agreements with existing<00:57:27.440> facilities.
• It doesn't require anybody to use a PPA to purchase any nuclear energy. It just enables it.
• <01:04:04.319> It<01:04:04.559> just purchase any nuclear energy.
• It just purchase any nuclear energy. It just enables<01:04:05.280> it.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Sometimes these teachers go together, and then we have a process where it is purchased and sent to them
• Through this program, the Nevada Department of Agriculture purchases nutritious foods that are grown,
• SB 233 allocates $800,000 to keep the Home Feeds Nevada Agriculture Food Purchase Program running and
• To ensure that those are purchased for schools. Thank you so much.
• We have currently purchased the land for 2023.

Bills: AB568, SB90, SB133, SB147, SB229, SB233, SB240, SB245, SB280, SB378, SB393, SB417, SB434, SB494, SB495

Keywords: higher education, Nevada System of Higher Education, operational expenses, instructional expenses, public funding, education funding, teacher grants, classroom supplies, instructional support, specialized personnel, civics education, Nevada Center for Civic Engagement, funding, youth programs, civic involvement, Southern Nevada, Clark County, Las Vegas Valley, regional planning, economic resiliency

Transcript Highlights:

• agreements to ensure that any of our purchases are at the lowest cost. possible.
• Purchasing properties. Is that correct?
• When we would go purchase land, when we would use those funds for development.
• Did you purchase a couple? No, we did not not not Garner. There are It was near there.
• It allows them to purchase products from the farmer at a discounted rate. dual benefit here.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Would this language create a clean title or would this still recognize to a purchaser that there has
• <00:48:21.200> that<00:48:21.440> there rec recognize to a purchaser that there rec
• recognize to a purchaser that there has<00:48:21.839> been<00:48:22.000> damage<00:48:
• So this will allow, if myself as an individual wanted to repair, we can purchase that car back, have
• the dealer or purchaser. the dealer or purchaser. >> Uhhuh. >> Uhhuh.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Interim Joint Committee on Transportation approved the minutes from its September 16 meeting and then heard a presentation from Jason Sawala, deputy state highway engineer with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, on rest areas and truck parking. He described Kentucky’s system of eight welcome centers, 14 rest areas, and four truck havens, and said the Cabinet spent just over $12 million in fiscal year 2025 to operate and maintain those facilities. He also explained that the Cabinet’s truck parking study found truck parking demand has increased 24% since 2012, driven by just-in-time delivery, stricter hours-of-service and electronic logging requirements, and fewer drivers. Sawala said the study looked not only at Cabinet-owned facilities but also private truck stops and lots, and identified unmet parking demand across the state, especially at 1:00 a.m. He noted that 11 sites, mostly existing rest areas, weigh stations, or welcome centers, were identified as promising expansion locations, with estimated project costs in the $30 million to $36 million range in 2022 dollars. He said the Cabinet is working on design and project development for those sites and is seeking federal funding opportunities where available. Members raised concerns about safety, congestion, and trucks parking on ramps or in residential areas, and several asked about funding, charging for parking, and whether autonomous vehicles might reduce future demand. Sawala said the 820 public rest-area spaces are marked spaces only, that he was not aware of any state charging for public truck parking, and that federal programs can help fund some expansions. He also said he was not aware of local-government parking programs offhand but would look into it. Members generally emphasized the importance of truck parking for safety, commerce, and avoiding burdens on local communities.

Transcript Highlights:

• Class 2 right now is saturated, which means basically that there are no Class 2 RECs being purchased
• purchased by the utilities. utilities. utilities.
• purchase class two certificates. purchase class two certificates.
• <00:05:20.479> alternative to make to purchase alternative to make to purchase alternative
• operation. um they were able to purchase operation. um they were able to purchase um<01:00:10.720

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 219, which would revise the renewable portfolio standard by changing several class definitions, eliminating Class 2, lowering the utility obligation for Class 1 thermal renewable energy certificates from 2.2% to 1.7%, and adjusting alternative compliance payments. Representative Vose said the bill would save ratepayers an estimated $5.7 million annually, arguing that Class 2 is already saturated and that the changes would not materially affect renewable energy development. Members questioned the fiscal impact, with an amended fiscal note cited as showing a $1.2 million reduction in general fund revenue, and some members raised concerns that the bill could weaken one of the remaining incentives for renewable investment. The committee also reviewed the bill’s history, including that it had been added to HB 2 and then removed in conference committee. No vote was taken in the work session. The committee then heard House Bill 164, concerning local records retention and the creation of a local records manager position. Secretary of State David Scanlan testified that the position has existed in statute for years but has never been funded, and said the need has grown as records management has become more digital and ADA accessibility has become more important. He described the bill as a way to help towns preserve and digitize records, especially for smaller communities with limited resources, while keeping records locally when possible. Members asked about the fiscal note, the potential cost of a public website and storage system, and whether the state could start by funding the position alone; the secretary said the staffing cost estimate remained accurate but that storage costs could rise over time. Several members expressed support and suggested further discussion with the Department of Information or other agencies. The work session was then closed without action. Finally, the committee opened House Bill 365, which would provide proof of U.S. citizenship assistance for indigent voters. Secretary Scanlan said the bill is intended to help voters comply with the new voter registration documentation requirements by allowing the state to verify eligibility through federal, private, and other state databases, and by providing vouchers to cover the cost of obtaining documents such as birth certificates. He compared the proposal to the earlier voter ID law, which he said was successfully implemented with accommodations for voters lacking acceptable ID. Members asked how “indigent” would be defined and how the process would work for out-of-state-born applicants; the secretary said indigency would likely be based on a voter’s statement of inability to pay and that the state would help identify where to obtain records and, if necessary, verify them through outside databases. The discussion continued as the transcript ended, with no vote recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• For example, if I said that institutional home purchasing accounted for 20,000 units and then started
• Why don't we actually address the issue of allowing corporate purchases that then remain vacant and not
• For example, if I said that institutional home purchasing accounted for 20,000 units and then started
• Lights in particular, about how some of them will provide right of first refusal to purchase or help
• And do they build homes, or do they just purchase homes and rent them out?

Summary: The committee heard several bills, with the most detailed discussion focused on AB 316, AB 251, AB 474, AB 1201, AB 464, and AB 614. AB 316 would prevent AI developers or deployers from arguing in civil cases that an AI system’s alleged autonomy absolves them of responsibility. Supporters framed it as a narrow guardrail to protect families, especially children, from harms like dangerous chatbots and deepfakes; opponents, including TechNet and the Chamber of Progress, raised concerns about possible strict-liability implications. The bill was moved out of committee to Privacy and Consumer Protection. AB 251 would let judges lower the burden of proof in elder abuse cases when a skilled nursing facility or RCFE intentionally destroys evidence. Supporters said the measure is needed because elder abuse victims are often unable to testify and records are vulnerable to spoliation, while opponents argued existing sanctions are sufficient and warned of more litigation. The bill passed, with committee members emphasizing the vulnerability of elder abuse victims. AB 474 sought to expand nonprofit home-sharing programs, including tax incentives for low-income homeowners and changes to housing law and lodger rules. Supporters said it would help older adults and low-income Californians avoid homelessness, but several members and the California Apartment Association raised concerns about removing lodger-law protections for homeowners; the author committed to keep working on the issue. The bill passed to Human Services. AB 1201 would give courts discretion to provide family reunification services to parents with certain violent felony convictions, rather than applying an automatic bypass. Supporters from Starting Over Inc. described personal experiences with permanent family separation and argued the bill would give parents a fair chance when the conviction is unrelated to child safety. Some members supported the measure but questioned whether domestic violence histories should be treated differently; the author said the bill still allows courts to deny services when reunification would endanger a child. The bill passed to Human Services. AB 464 addressed sexual abuse and retaliation in state prisons by extending reporting time after release, adding 90-day monitoring after reports, barring rehiring of confirmed abusers, and strengthening reporting and anti-retaliation rules. Survivors testified about abuse, retaliation, and failures in CDCR’s response; the bill passed to Appropriations. AB 614 would standardize the Government Claims Act filing deadline at one year for all claims. The author and supporters argued the current six-month deadline for injury and wrongful death claims is too short for victims to learn the process, find counsel, and gather evidence, while businesses often get a full year. A civil rights attorney and a family member of a deceased jail detainee testified in support, describing how the current deadline can block meritorious claims. The bill was presented for committee consideration as the hearing continued.

Transcript Highlights:

• contraception at these locations. ...requiring ID to purchase contraception at these locations, and
• Teens are often shamed or denied service when trying to purchase condoms.
• Goal, giving consumers better information about the beverages that they purchase every day.
• As I stated at the beginning, the information should be very clear at the point of purchase.
• The information should be very clear at the point of purchase.

Keywords: 988, house, all