Video & Transcript Research : 'longitudinal analysis'

Page 51 of 332
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pension Funding Council Jun 23rd, 2026

Pension Funding Council

Transcript Highlights:
  • These were informed by 2020 analysis from our office.
  • Standards of practice also necessitate certain risk analysis to go along with contribution rates that
  • assumptions related to contribution rates, and standards of practice also necessitate certain risk analysis
  • Then, looking to the future, we still have further analysis to produce a funding valuation that would
  • of each institution's... ...to perform an actuarial evaluation and analysis of each institution's higher
Summary: The Pension Funding Council met on June 23, 2026, for a work session that began with an overview of the Higher Education Supplemental Retirement Plan (SRP) and a 2025 accounting valuation of that plan. Staff explained that the SRP is a closed defined benefit supplement for higher education employees hired before the 2011 closure, with employer contributions currently pre-funding benefits in institution-specific trusts while institutions still pay benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis. The State Actuary’s office reported that the plan’s accounting position has improved, with combined market assets of about $245 million against $377 million in accrued liability, and that strong market performance since 2022 has increased the asset-to-liability ratio. The office emphasized that this was an educational accounting valuation, not a funding valuation for rate-setting. The council then received the 2025 actuarial valuation report for the state retirement systems. Actuaries reviewed the recent demographic experience study, noting updated assumptions for mortality, retirement, termination, and salary growth, and said the net impact on most plans was small. They reported that most plans’ funded ratios improved, with all plans at least 94% funded and several at or above 100%, and that contribution rates for the 2027–2029 biennium are generally lower than current rates. They also noted that future rates could be affected by market volatility as deferred gains are recognized over the next few years. During public comment, a representative of the Association of Washington Cities urged the council to consider rate reductions to help local governments facing budget pressures. In executive session, the council first approved a motion directing the Office of the State Actuary to perform an actuarial evaluation and analysis of each institution’s Higher Education Supplemental Retirement Plan, including institution-specific contribution rates, asset sufficiency, and funding policy options, due by July 1, 2028. The council then adopted the 2027–2029 pension contribution rates based on the 2025 actuarial valuation report. Both motions passed 5-0, with one member excused. The meeting concluded with no further business.
CT
Transcript Highlights:
  • what we were thinking in terms of medical frailty, what other states were doing, and show you that analysis
  • They've been doing a lot of the analysis associated with this, so I want to recognize their hard work
  • know that that was baked into the rule in part, which does align with the way we've been doing our analysis
  • Not to say that, again, the analysis equals the Align with the way we've been doing our analysis.
  • Not to say that, again, the analysis equals the implementation practice.
Keywords: 962, all
Summary: The Care Management Committee met to receive a status update on the DSS/CHN PCMH program and to discuss implementation of HR1, especially the new medical frailty requirements. CHN reported the PCMH program remained steady at 124 practices and 553 sites, with 54.6% of the HUSKY population attributed to PCMH providers, and noted ongoing recruitment, provider turnover, and recent practice consolidations/acquisitions that will shift some sites to Yale and Hartford HealthCare. CHN also reported strong quality improvement engagement for 2026, with 83% of contacted PCMHs engaged, and said preliminary 2025 results showed improvement across measures. The bulk of the meeting focused on DSS’s response to the June 1 CMS interim final rule on HR1. DSS explained that it had been building a medical frailty definition based on diagnosis codes and comparisons with other states’ approaches, but the new federal rule adds a requirement that the condition significantly impair a person’s ability to work or comply with community engagement requirements. DSS said it is still evaluating how to combine claims-based data with the new federal overlay, may submit comments to CMS during the open comment period through July 31, and is considering options such as self-attestation, especially given CMS’s allowance of self-attestation for calendar year 2027. Committee members raised concerns about the rule’s complexity, possible legal challenges, the need for a good-faith waiver or implementation delay, and the risk of noncompliance if the state gets the process wrong. Members also pressed DSS for broader outreach, clearer public communication, training, and better reporting on implementation impacts and costs. DSS said it is developing a website, webinars, and a communications plan, and is working with community-based organizations, community health workers, and administrative services organizations to reach potentially affected members. DSS said it is also building a Medicaid pre-screener to help people determine whether they may be subject to work requirements. In the PCMH Plus discussion, DSS said it was not yet ready to present the 2024 quality data but would try to bring the Wave 3, Year 5 results and related quality/shared savings information to the July 8 meeting, along with the regular PCMH update and another HR1 update. The committee also discussed future agenda items including community health worker reimbursement, peer support services, and the inmate medical program.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Feb 9th, 2026 at 08:35 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Many organizations, including ours, participated in a comprehensive analysis to identify the needs of
  • The statewide IEP—we’ve learned through data analysis that students with disabilities have a slightly
  • We’ve learned through data analysis that students with disabilities have a slightly higher transfer rate
  • The data analysis reveals that one in three New Mexico high school students with disabilities change
  • Because in the bill analysis, it talks about on the second page, it says...
Keywords: 996, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It was a cost analysis by ERCOT that came up with those numbers.
  • we, in our interim report, discussed or put in there that the PUC should complete an independent analysis
  • it sufficient do you think do you have as much confidence in ERCOT's methodology regarding a cost analysis
  • versus doing an independent analysis and waiting for that independent analysis before deciding. deciding
  • islanded and taken away from the grid. we would effectively do what's called a reliability must run analysis
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
CT
Transcript Highlights:
  • And so having the analysis that we need to take a peek at how we're doing these things is just very,
  • So we have that analysis done.
  • Have those distinctions been made in your analysis with respect to pharmaceuticals? No.
  • We work with an outside vendor when we can for some analysis.
  • Like, so we did a whole month-by-month analysis and it does—people go in and out.
Keywords: 962, all
Summary: The Complex Care Committee meeting focused first on a new Diabetes Caucus launched at the Capitol. Rep. Johnson described the caucus as a forum to educate people about type 1 and type 2 diabetes, genetic risk, early testing, pregnancy-related diabetes, and ways Medicaid policy might improve prevention and lower long-term costs. Members agreed the caucus could intersect with care management, and Carolyn Grandell of CHNCT offered to share information about current diabetes-related care management services at a future meeting. The committee then heard a detailed presentation from Alex Rigger of the Office of Health Strategy, who is moving to the Office of Policy and Management. He reviewed Connecticut health care benchmark data, including total health care expenditures, medical spending, and market-by-market trends. He said 2023 to 2024 per-capita spending grew more than 8.5% statewide and 14% in Medicaid, with long-term care accounting for about 46% of Medicaid spending and retail pharmacy also identified as a major cost driver. Members asked about enrollment changes, dual-eligible populations, Medicare Savings Program members, 340B drug pricing, and value-based payment models. Rigger explained that his office tracks alternate payment models and quality benchmarks, but does not separately capture 340B data. Discussion then shifted to Medicare Advantage, dual eligibles, and hospital discharge planning. Members said they want better data on how many Medicaid members are in Medicare Advantage plans and whether those plans shift costs back to Medicaid or affect access to care, especially for complex-care patients. Staff noted DSS does have some Medicare Advantage indicators and that CMS is developing encounter-data rules for states. Kathy Holt and others raised concerns about denials, nursing home stays, and the need to compare Medicaid spending for dual eligibles in Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare. The meeting ended with plans for follow-up data sharing, including Alex Rigger’s slides, the diabetes caucus materials, and a future discussion with DSS and other agencies; no formal votes were taken.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • So a lot of analysis goes into the decision point of what's the path forward, and then once we have that
  • So a lot of analysis to approach this?
  • So a lot of analysis goes<00:08:16.080> into<00:08:16.319> the<00:08:16.560> decision
  • Uh, the analysis process is really kind of—>> that's what I get for being late.
  • So when we get to that analysis stage, that's when we start asking the questions about, you know, is
Summary: The House Budget Review Subcommittee on Personnel, Public Retirement, and Finance heard a presentation from the Commonwealth Office of Technology on legacy IT modernization funds and how they are used to address outdated, unsupported, or unsustainable systems. David Carter and Carrie Welch explained the state’s definition of a legacy system under KRS 7A.180, emphasizing not only vendor support issues but also changing business needs, regulatory compliance, and the loss of institutional knowledge for older systems. They described the office’s review process for determining whether a project qualifies, including assessing business risk, comparing options such as upgrades, replacements, shared solutions across agencies, or commercial products, and then matching the project to available funding. The presenters said COT reports twice a year to the Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue on progress with legacy modernization projects. They reported 30 projects funded to date, with 18 completed, and said remaining projects are still moving forward while agencies continue to identify modernization needs. They highlighted examples of completed work, including modernized security cameras, replacement of unsupported systems, migration of documents to the Commonwealth Enterprise Content Management Platform, restoration of vendor support, a digital policy acknowledgement portal, replacement of the State Police dispatch system, and digitization of paper records for faster retrieval and better disaster resilience. Members asked for more detail on how the $10 million request would be allocated, including system-by-system spending, the split between software, hardware, vendor contracts, and staff time, and how the office determines when a system needs replacement. COT said it did not have a system-by-system or cost-category breakdown at the hearing but could provide one later, and explained that the funds are intended for development and first-time acquisition costs rather than ongoing maintenance. They also said the $5 million annual request was based on prior years’ experience and that agencies often contribute some funding themselves, so the program could still operate if appropriated less than the full amount. The committee then approved the minutes and adjourned.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Executive Departments and Administration (01/28/2026)

Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • page, the first page is cost analysis. page, the first page is cost analysis.
  • financial analysis for this. financial analysis for this.
  • modelers in the state did this analysis. modelers in the state did this analysis.
  • They're risk analysis people.
  • It's a risk analysis.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Environment and Natural Resources Jan 13th, 2026

Environment and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • As part of this report, Florida Park Service conducted an analysis of repair, maintenance, and upgrades
  • DEP also conducted analysis that evaluated future growth and recreational demands through the review
  • The Florida Park Service analysis of our unit management plans for all 175 state parks identified and
  • We also conducted analysis that evaluated future growth and recreational demands through the review of
  • The Florida Park Service analysis of our unit management plans for all 175 state parks identified and
Bills: S0544, S0636, S0848, S0546
Summary: The Environment and Natural Resources Committee met with a quorum and took up several bills. SB 636 on beach management, by Senator Leek, would create additional pathways for counties and municipalities to obtain critically eroded beach or area of critical state concern designations, shifting the process toward a more proactive approach. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell raised concerns about local capacity and funding, and the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association said the bill was an alternative pathway but emphasized the need for more recurring funding. The bill was reported favorably. The committee then considered SB 544, which transfers the Golf Course Best Management Practices Certification Program from DEP to FDACS and establishes certification and training standards there. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell asked about environmental oversight, taxation, and whether the change would affect state park restrictions; the sponsor said it would not change tax treatment or park rules and that DEP would still handle enforcement if BMPs are not followed. The Florida Springs Council opposed the bill, arguing golf courses are not agriculture and warning of weaker protections for springs, while the Florida Golf Course Superintendent's Association supported the move as a continuity and participation measure. After adopting a technical amendment, the committee reported the bill favorably, with Senator Smith voting no. SB 848 on stormwater treatment, also by Senator Trunow, was amended to clarify the role of water quality enhancement areas while stormwater rules are still being finalized and to make public-land project review forward-looking. Resource Environmental Solutions supported the amendment and bill as providing a clearer market for water quality credits, and the Florida Home Builders Association supported the measure. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably. SB 546 by Vice Chair Mayfield would require 30-day public notice before meetings reviewing the sale or exchange of state conservation lands, including at water management districts; after a technical amendment, it received support from conservation groups and was reported favorably. The committee also received a DEP presentation on the State Park Amenities Report, which said Florida’s 175 state parks drew over 28 million visitors and generated a $3.6 billion economic impact. DEP identified nearly $759 million in needed repairs and upgrades over 10 years and $1.39 billion in contemplated new construction and development in unit management plans. No votes were taken on the presentation, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Jobs and Economic Development - 02/23/26

Jobs and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • He said that will be a factor that the actuaries consider as they do the analysis.
  • <00:31:32.640> factor actuaries as they do the analysis factor actuaries as they do the analysis
  • Any actuarial analysis that's based on the experience in the other states. Mr.
  • actuarial analysis. actuarial analysis.
  • <01:13:33.840> It's from the actuial analysis. It's from the actuial analysis.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 01/15/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then at the bottom of the page is the incidence analysis.
  • And then at the bottom of the page is the incidence analysis.
  • At the bottom of the page is the incidence analysis.
  • So this is what an incidence analysis looks like.
  • The seventh component of review is our incidence analysis.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/27/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The holiday pay is no different, and based on what the law currently requires us to do in the analysis
  • They are simply following statute on how they’re doing their analysis.
  • We support a more in-depth analysis that looks at the actual costs on individual facilities.
  • is done as you heard from analysis is done as you heard from previous<00:53:42.720> testifiers
  • we support a more in-depth analysis we support a more in-depth analysis<00:53:50.480> that<00
Bills: HF1419, HF500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Capital Investment - 01/28/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • don't<00:16:39.880> have<00:16:40.639> that Additional funds — I don't have that analysis
  • In 2018, we contracted with an engineering firm and conducted a water and sewer system analysis.
  • The analysis found several deficiencies and recommended a replacement of the water, sanitary sewer, and
  • <01:27:48.920> the water and sore system analysis the water and sore system analysis the analysis
  • found several deficiencies and analysis found several deficiencies and recommend<01:27:51.960> a<
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

2026 Legislative Session - Day Sixty Two - Monday, May 4

Missouri House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • She is as ready to laugh as she is to do amazing policy analysis work.
  • Upon receiving her analysis, we would have great discussions about what questions needed to be asked
  • to Upon receiving her analysis, we would have great discussions about what questions needed to be asked
  • With Claire taking on this analysis role, she helped my L.A.
Keywords: 959, house, all
AR

Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session

CODE REVISION COMMISSION Apr 9th, 2026

CODE REVISION COMMISSION

Transcript Highlights:
  • Could you talk about just the analysis as you look at the recommendation of these volumes?
  • Could you talk about just the analysis as you look at the recommendation of these volumes?
  • legislative session, when the cumulative supplement is created, we have our editorial staff doing an analysis
  • , a page count analysis, for every volume.
Keywords: 1204, all
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • And there was a good analysis, and let me say, during COVID, because of a federal share for Medicaid
  • So we had a whole year's worth of doing that, and we used that data to help as input into our analysis
  • And there was a good analysis, and let me say, during COVID, because of a federal share for Medicaid
  • And there was a good analysis, and let me say, during COVID, because of a federal share for Medicaid
  • "The best analysis that I've seen over my career is two things.
Summary: The committee met to hear a presentation from Dr. Hicks on the governor’s recommended budget for the next biennium. He reviewed the revenue outlook, noting modest general fund growth, a large rainy day fund balance, and the impact of recent income tax reductions. He said the budget was built around recurring reductions, lower debt service and retirement contribution rates, and the use of excess restricted funds, while protecting K-12 education, Medicaid, postsecondary education, public safety, and pension obligations. Dr. Hicks outlined several major spending and reserve proposals, including $350 million from the Department of Insurance’s excess restricted funds to support Medicaid in the first year, $150 million for the affordable housing trust fund, $125 million for rural hospitals, $100 million to offset lost federal ACA premium tax credits, $75 million for utility assistance, and $50 million for food assistance. In education, the proposal included a phased pre-K for all plan funded by sports wagering tax revenue, a 3% annual salary increase for full-time school personnel, continued full funding of teacher pensions, a 2.5% annual increase in SEEK base funding, and additional support for career and technical education and school facilities. He also discussed Medicaid cost pressures, including higher managed care, pharmacy, behavioral health, and nursing facility costs, and explained the expected effects of federal HR1 changes on Kentucky’s Medicaid program. Those changes include work and community engagement requirements and more frequent eligibility redeterminations for expansion members, which the administration estimated would reduce enrollment by about 4,300 in the first year and 28,000 in the second year. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the meeting, which was limited to the budget presentation and member questions.
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Appropriations Mar 2nd, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • The answer to the question is I've not done a cost-benefit analysis, but if we pass this bill, we are
  • analysis as part of a business plan to be presented back to the legislature and the governor before
  • Are we going to get a bill analysis on the floor? It doesn't matter how you feel about the issue.
  • As I mentioned before, there's been no bill analysis. There's no economic analysis.
  • And maybe that is the end result after a thorough analysis.
Summary: The Appropriations Committee considered a large agenda of bills and reported several measures favorably. Early action included SB 6, a settled claim bill involving the Department of Children and Families and a trust for Leila Estrada and Sapphire Williams, and CS/CS/SB 1266, which creates a cybersecurity experiential learning and clearance-readiness program through the Department of Commerce and Cyber Florida. The committee also approved SB 532 on clerks of court funding, allowing clerks to retain all excess Article V revenue rather than returning half to the state and clarifying foreclosure sale procedures. In addition, the committee passed CS/CS/SB 1602 and CS/CS/SB 1604 to create and fund a pilot housing program for veterans through the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, and CS/SB 1110 to expand Medicaid and private insurance coverage for medically necessary orthotics and prosthetics, including testimony from affected families and advocates. The committee also adopted an amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/SB 1012 on inmate services, removing the bill’s medical-services compensation provisions while retaining changes to the inmate welfare trust fund and related facility uses. It also adopted a delete-all amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/CS/SB 1614, which was narrowed to remove a provision allowing local governments to use excess fees to construct new buildings. The committee spent substantial time on CS/SB 17, a Medicaid oversight and transparency bill. The sponsor said the measure would create a joint legislative Medicaid oversight committee, authorize the Legislature to retain its own actuary, modernize Medicaid statutes, strengthen managed-care performance standards, and increase accountability for pharmacy benefit managers and related entities. After amendment, the committee adopted changes removing several PBM-related provisions while retaining the broader oversight framework. Testimony from supporters emphasized transparency, fraud prevention, and cost control, while a PBM trade association asked to continue working on affiliate-manufacturer, network, and payment issues. The bill was reported favorably. The most extensive discussion centered on CS/SB 1758, which proposes major changes to Medicaid and SNAP. The sponsor described five reforms: stronger fraud and overpayment recovery authority, a Medicaid work requirement for certain able-bodied adults, expanded behavioral-health services through Medicaid waivers, pharmacy-program changes to obtain rebates and reduce institutional costs, and SNAP/EBT reforms including photo IDs and work requirements. The committee adopted two amendments: one adding a transitional “glide path” for people who gain employment but risk losing Medicaid, and another exempting hospice patients with six months or less to live. Supporters argued the bill would reduce fraud, improve accountability, and encourage work, while opponents warned it would increase administrative burdens, push eligible people off coverage, and conflict with federal law or guidance. The bill remained under debate with extensive public testimony from advocates, providers, and affected families, and the transcript ends before final disposition on the measure.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Apr 8th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • So one of the cases referenced in the analysis is Snap v.
  • And I think ultimately the bill and the analysis kind of reflects the work that was put in.
  • And I think ultimately the bill and the analysis kind of reflects the work that was put in.
  • I just don't know; it wasn't really spelled out in the analysis.
  • I’d like to thank staff for their thorough analysis.
Summary: The committee heard several bills, beginning with AB 2, which would create enhanced civil penalties for large social media companies when negligence proven in court causes harm to children and teens. The author and supporters argued the bill is needed to address addictive algorithms and harmful content, while opponents warned it was vague, could chill speech, and might be preempted by federal law. Members largely focused on whether the bill changed the standard of care or burden of proof; the bill passed out of committee on a roll call vote, with some members noting concerns but supporting it to continue the discussion. AB 282, dealing with housing vouchers and source-of-income discrimination, would clarify that housing providers may prioritize applicants who qualify for rental assistance without violating fair housing law. Supporters from housing authorities, local governments, and advocacy groups said it would help voucher holders find units and improve use of housing funds. There was no opposition, and the bill passed to Appropriations on a roll call vote, with two no votes. The committee also considered AB 882 on court reporter availability and electronic recording in certain cases when a court reporter is unavailable. Supporters said the bill is a temporary, narrowly tailored response to a shortage of reporters and would preserve access to accurate records, while opponents argued it was too narrow, raised access-to-justice concerns, and should be broadened. Members from both sides emphasized the importance of court reporters and electronic recording as a backup; the bill passed with an urgency clause and was sent to Appropriations. The committee then heard AB 325 on algorithmic price fixing, AB 935 on civil rights data clarity, AB 1414 on tenant choice of internet service provider, and AB 67 on Attorney General enforcement of the Reproductive Privacy Act; each drew support from sponsors and advocacy groups, opposition centered on overbreadth or policy concerns, and each advanced on committee votes, with several members requesting further amendments or clarification.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Specific to the Immediate Needs Program, the tiered rate structure mandates that we conduct an analysis
  • We're working with the Public Consulting Group to conduct this analysis, and that work is underway.
  • We are eager to see the analysis around the immediate needs component of the children in Tier 2 and up
  • Brian Metzker, LAO: Our office recently released its analysis of the CWS project, and as part of that
  • analysis, we had recommendations that were largely focused on making best use of the funding that's
Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Human Services held an informational hearing on child welfare, foster care, child support, and related prevention efforts. The chair opened by emphasizing mandated reporting reform, foster care system improvements, and community-based prevention, and noted that no votes would be taken. Public testimony focused first on mandated reporting, where a lived-experience advocate and several organizations argued that the current system overreports families, especially Black, Native, and Latino families, causes trauma, and should be reformed through standardized training, clearer thresholds, and stronger community supports rather than more hotline referrals. Casey Family Programs cited data showing nearly 90% of reports are unsubstantiated, while CDSS said it is already forming a Mandated Reporting Advisory Committee, updating training, and exploring community pathways and possible changes to the list of mandated reporters. CWDA and SEIU supported training and alternative response concepts but stressed child safety, county capacity, funding, and the need for careful implementation and accountability. The committee then discussed a proposal to create a foster care multi-agency office within the California Health and Human Services Agency, led by a chief foster youth advocate with authority to coordinate across departments. Advocates said foster youth often need services from education, health, housing, and behavioral health systems that do not coordinate well, and argued that a central office with real authority could improve placement stability and access to services. CDSS responded that existing structures already provide coordination, including AB 2083 interagency teams, the Child Welfare Council, complex care steering committees, and the foster care ombudsperson, but said it was open to technical assistance. Members raised concerns about whether the new office would have enough authority and funding to avoid becoming another layer of bureaucracy, and the chair emphasized the need for real “teeth” and better interagency action. The final major topic was the continuation and expansion of Promise Neighborhoods. A community leader described strong early results from the state-funded neighborhoods, including improved kindergarten readiness, reduced chronic absenteeism, higher graduation rates, food access, housing supports, and mental health services, but warned that current funding sunsets in June 2025 and that a fiscal cliff could jeopardize staff and services. CDSS said the four funded neighborhoods have reported positive outcomes and valuable flexibility, but also noted challenges with one-time funding, student mental health, and long-term planning. Assemblymember Mia Bonta urged continued investment, saying the place-based model is difficult to rebuild once lost, and the chair asked LAO to help identify the minimum funding needed to preserve the existing infrastructure while evaluation results are still pending.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:30:33.360> uh completing actal and legal analysis uh completing actal and legal analysis
  • Uh, can you update this committee, uh, about what the progress is, uh, for that study and analysis?
  • Uh, can you update this committee, uh, about what the progress is, uh, for that study and analysis?
  • up our garbage in the final analysis. up our garbage in the final analysis.
  • I do also want to acknowledge that DI currently has an actuarial and legal analysis study underway.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • We don't have an analysis for looking at the cost.
  • We have an analysis for looking at what they've presented.
  • <00:47:29.960> for<00:47:30.160> looking um we don't have an analysis for looking um
  • just get see an example of the analysis just get see an example of the analysis that<00:47:59.200
  • DG really doesn't have a time to do a forensic analysis on the project because we know just about as
Summary: Chairman Hart called the meeting to order, confirmed a quorum, welcomed Representative Rachel Roarx, and the committee approved the February 11 minutes. The committee then moved through its agenda of PSC and related contract items, including a motion to consider the reviewed contracts without objection. One Department of Highways item was deferred when the virtual representatives were not yet available. The committee first took up Kentucky Housing Corporation contracts. Members questioned outside legal services for foreclosures and bankruptcies, why the work was not handled entirely in-house, and how much of the workload and cost it represented. Witnesses said the agency’s need was largely geographic rather than a lack of expertise, that less than 1% of the loan portfolio is referred out for foreclosures, and that many fees are reimbursable through FHA. Both Kentucky Housing Corporation items were approved. The committee then considered a Department for Community Based Services contract tied to a protest and a temporary renewal with PCG. Witnesses said the contract increase was needed to bridge the gap while the protest and RFP process were unresolved, and that the initial vendor received no funds. The committee approved the item, with Senator Douglas explaining his vote as a preference for straightforward answers. The committee also heard a Northern Kentucky University contract for a Workday ERP replacement, including implementation consulting and separate license fees. University officials explained the move from SAP to Workday, the complexity of the systems, and the need for a consulting partner; they said the total effort would span 10 years and that the contract was priced below comparable institutions. After extensive questioning about cost, budget, and value, the vote ended 4-4 and the chair noted the contract would move forward through the Finance Committee if no disapproval motion was made. Finally, the Office of Inspector General presented a contract for culture change training in nursing facilities funded by civil monetary penalties; witnesses said the goal was to improve staff satisfaction, communication, and resident outcomes, and that the CMP fund balance was about $38 million. Discussion also covered survey backlogs and CMS restrictions on the funds, with the item still under review as the transcript ended.