Video & Transcript Research : 'data mapping'
Page 51 of 500
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Capital Planning Advisory Board 6-23-21
KY
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Economic Development and Workforce Investment 6-17-21
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Capital Projects and Bond Oversight Committee 6-17-21
KY
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Committee 6-16-21
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
County Clerk Office Modernization Task Force 6-16-21
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Severe Mental Illness Task Force 6-15-21
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on State Government 6-15-21
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on General Government, Finance, Personnel, and Public Retirement (6-2-21)
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Economic Development, Tourism, and Environmental Protection (6-2-21)
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Education (6-2-21)
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Justice and Judiciary (6-2-21)
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Human Resources (6-2-21)
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Transportation (6-1-21)
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Tangible data that this map is not legal, period.
- We're required to draw the maps based on the 2020 census data.
- Look at racial data, but you recognize that your law firm and the map drawer had to look at racial data
- I don't know what the map drawer looked at. You do know that the map drawer looked at racial data.
- Data to decide whether I wanted to carry this map and whether I thought it was a good map for the state
Bills:
SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
Keywords:
disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, STAAR, Texas Education Agency, TEA, public school accountability, school ratings, A-F ratings, assessment reform, student testing, benchmark tests, interim assessments
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- This map is drawn, and the only way it can be legally drawn is on the 2020 census data.
- I haven't looked at any of the racial data in the 2021 map.
- Have you seen the data analysis performed by some data... Scientists at UCLA on your map?
- I have an opinion on that; I didn't look at any racial data with regard to this map.
- Generally, yes, I have not taken racial data into consideration in drawing the map.
Bills:
SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
Keywords:
disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, STAAR, Texas Education Agency, TEA, public school accountability, school ratings, A-F ratings, assessment reform, student testing, benchmark tests, interim assessments
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- This bill will prohibit the sharing of the data with a third party if the data is going to be used to
- Our public safety, our law enforcement can use this data, but to be able to sell this data and also to
- When you say private entity, do you mean the party collecting the data or the party whose data is being
- This data can be shared.
- , but there may be other vendors or brokers that do sell this data. this data, but there may be other
Keywords:
cannabis, cannabis packaging, cannabis labeling, cannabis regulation, Cannabis Control Division, adulterated cannabis, artificial color additive, food dye, youth appeal, minor appeal, child-resistant packaging, black-and-white packaging, edibles, product labeling, consumer protection, marijuana, hemp, dispensary, licensed cannabis business, cannabis manufacturer
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- So you’re using data—the underlying basis of the data you’re using to craft 28 new maps is based on data
- “So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
- So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
- How did you use the partisan data in drawing this map?
- The map drawer just said himself that they did use partisan data to draw the maps.
Summary:
The Committee on Rules met with a quorum and heard a Governor’s Office presentation on a proposed congressional reapportionment map. The governor’s counsel argued that mid-cycle congressional redistricting is legally permissible, that race should not be considered at all in drawing districts, and that the Florida Fair Districts provisions are inconsistent with federal equal protection law and should be treated as non-severable. The presentation also discussed the pending U.S. Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais and the Florida Supreme Court’s Black Voters Matter decision as part of the legal rationale for the map.
Jason Parada, who said he drew the map alone, described the map as based on 2020 census block data, with county-level population estimates used only as a guide to identify faster-growing areas. He said the plan keeps 48 counties and 382 municipalities whole, has compactness scores similar to the current benchmark map, and uses traditional geographic and political boundaries such as roads, railways, county lines, and municipal lines. He walked through regional changes, emphasizing a race-neutral redesign that significantly altered South Florida, including changes to districts in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and the Everglades, while leaving several northern districts largely unchanged.
Members questioned the witnesses extensively about the legal theory, the use of partisan data, the role of race, population growth, and the timing and review of the map. The witnesses said partisan data was considered along with other traditional redistricting criteria, but race was not used. They also said they could not speak to who else reviewed the map beyond EOG staff and counsel. Several senators raised concerns about the map’s compactness, county and city splits, the apparent partisan effects, and the fact that the map was released shortly before the special session. No vote or final action on the map was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- So you're using data—the underlying basis of the data you're using to craft 28 new maps—is based on data
- So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
- How did you use the partisan data in drawing this map?
- Partisan data when they drew the map. They told us that, that they used partisan data.
- The map drawer just said himself that they did use partisan data to draw the maps.