Video & Transcript Research : 'statute of limitations'

Page 4 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/13/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • working Minnesotans completely and, in other cases, drastically limiting the benefits of the program
  • Minnesota SHRM is in support of House File 1976, specifically the limitation of benefits to six weeks
  • > limitation<00:56:54.960> of<00:56:55.160> benefits specifically the limitation
  • of benefits specifically the limitation of benefits to<00:56:55.720> 6<00:56:55.960> weeks
  • Current statute requires the employer to cover a minimum of 50% of the premium, with the remaining portion
Bills: HF1976
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 18th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • to provide for the sale of motor fuel to participants of fuel rewards programs, to prohibit a limit on
  • the allowable discount of fuel purchased with fuel reward points, to prohibit a limit on the value of
  • recovery of attorneys' fees and costs in disciplinary... ...occupations, to provide relative to limiting
  • The statute currently says they may impose attorney fees for their recovery of the prosecution of the
  • I certainly understand where there are a limited number of people that have the knowledge and know-how
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I believe Chairman Cole Heffner has got a couple of bills.
  • We are going to reduce all of your remarks to the journal in writing, all of it, so we can have it in
  • The bill is in favor of it, and the organization that I'm a part of is Ranger Base Rudder, which is a
  • part of the U.S.
  • Lopez was wondering if there is an age limit. We're interested to know. I'm older than all of you.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 4th, 2026 at 06:03 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I have to my left is a lawyer extraordinaire of the Council of the Governor's Office.
  • Better defined standards support better outcomes, public safety, and more effective use of limited behavioral
  • Yeah, it's not in front of you folks. Yeah, it's not in front of you.
  • I was shocked to kind of see lobotomy in there in our statute. Thank you, Madam.
  • So, I think I was just curious about the addition of that in the statute, being that it's not current
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 20th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • a DFPS child abuse investigation or not is irrelevant for the purposes of the discovery statute.
  • we're going to kind of limit it to a misdemeanor when another parent entices or persuades the child
  • So this bill does not change the storage timeline; it's either two years or the statute of limitations
  • I believe in another piece of statute within existing...
  • Again, I would like to give you a couple of additional top lines: a 10-year statute of limitations for
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/20/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are several statutes that many of our recorders have interpreted to mean maybe we shouldn't be
  • There's a number of nuisance statutes that, you know, can't just allow your pool to be untreated and
  • State or local governments cannot impose state laws of any kind, abrogating or limiting any right or
  • privilege. ...cannot impose state laws of any kind, abrogating or limiting any right or privilege.
  • DCAC is a sentencing enhancement statute based solely on the age of the victim.
Summary: The Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee heard and advanced several election, judiciary, child welfare, and criminal justice measures. SB 1489 would require paid petition circulators for initiatives and referenda to disclose their name, state of residence, and paid status verbally and on a badge, add registration requirements for certain local circulators, prohibit pay by signature for local measures, and apply strict compliance and funding-disclosure rules to local initiatives. The ACLU opposed it as compelled speech and a burden on political expression, while the Arizona Chamber supported it as transparency and parity with state-level rules. The committee recommended the bill do pass on a 4-3 vote. SB 1609, an emergency measure concerning political party names, would require proposed party names to be distinguishable from existing parties and bar use of terms like “independent” or similar variations. The Arizona Independent Party opposed it as a retroactive change and “cartel protection,” while county election officials and the Arizona Association of Counties supported it as reducing voter confusion. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass on a 7-0 vote. SCR 1040, a voter-approved constitutional referral, would raise the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices of courts of record from 70 to 75; supporters argued it reflects longer life expectancy and preserves experienced judges, while opponents said voters previously rejected a similar proposal and that an age limit is preferable. It passed 5-2. The committee also considered SB 1234, which changes juvenile court representation rules by requiring a guardian ad litem in dependency and termination cases and allowing appointment of an attorney for the child depending on age and ability to express an opinion. Sponsor Senator Werner said the bill was part of a broader child-safety reform effort informed by cases such as Rebecca Baptiste, arguing that a guardian ad litem with attorney authority would better protect children’s best interests. Child welfare attorneys and advocates opposed the bill, saying children need a dedicated attorney-client relationship, confidentiality, and a voice separate from the court or DCS; DCS remained neutral. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass on a 5-2 vote. SB 1661 would allow a presumed father to be relieved of child support obligations if genetic testing shows he is not the biological father; supporters described cases where men remained liable despite exclusionary DNA results, and the bill passed 6-0. Later, the committee heard election administration and transparency bills. SB 1392 would give governing bodies canvassing elections access to locations where election materials are created, handled, processed, tabulated, or stored, so they can observe procedures and review records while protecting secrecy and security; county officials raised concerns about the term “agent,” and the bill passed 4-3. SB 1634 would require ADOT to provide county recorders with a copy of an applicant’s handwritten signature when facilitating voter registration; county officials said it would improve signature comparison, and the bill passed 5-2 after a vote correction. SB 1743 would redact an individual donor’s employer street number, employer name, or residence address from public campaign finance reports, with penalties for improper disclosure; supporters cited privacy and safety, while opponents argued employer information is important for transparency and identifying influence. It passed 5-2. SB 1099, a strike-everything amendment, set statutory criteria for defamation claims involving public or private figures and public or private concerns, including falsity, reckless disregard, and context; it passed 4-3. After a recess, the committee heard SB 1535, which increases penalties for buyers of sexual conduct, including making the conduct a class 6 felony and adding a $200 assessment to support anti-human trafficking services. The sponsor and supporters, including survivors, law enforcement, neighborhood advocates, and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, said the bill targets demand that fuels trafficking and neighborhood disorder. Opponents from criminal justice and anti-violence groups said the bill should include a rebuttable presumption to better protect trafficking victims. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 02-02-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:08.560> day<00:01:08.799> and journal of the preceding day and journal of the
  • round of applause, please. Thank you. round of applause, please. Thank you.
  • Four of them I met this morning.
  • to have here with us uh the leader of the Senate of Ireland, Senator Mark Daly.
  • of Ireland, Senator Mark of the Senate of Ireland, Senator Mark Daly.<00:14:49.839> Please<00:
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • As the statute of limitations clock begins at the time of the offense, That's not upon discovery by the
  • Under current law, statute of limitations for certain financial fraud crimes crimes in Chapter 32 of
  • statute of limitation of three years.
  • Chairman, under Chapter Chapter 32 of the Penal Code with a 3-year limitation to a 7-year statute of
  • It's pretty straightforward that some of the crime crimes only have a three-year statute of limitation
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Some offenses like credit card and debit card abuse are given a seven-year statute of limitations.
  • of limitation of three years.
  • Chairman, under Chapter 32 of the Penal Code, with a three-year limitation to a seven-year statute of
  • It's pretty straightforward that some of the crimes only have a three-year statute of limitation.
  • It's pretty straightforward that some of the crimes only have a three-year statute of limitation.
Summary: The committee heard several criminal justice bills, with testimony largely focused on public safety, court procedures, and local criminal justice administration. SB 2371 would expand mandatory skimmer-reporting requirements from gas pumps to ATMs, point-of-sale systems, and virtual currency kiosks, with the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center saying centralized reporting would improve investigations, preserve evidence, and help identify organized criminal groups. SB 2581 would repeal a special law governing commissary funds in certain large counties; the sponsor and the Sheriff’s Association said it would restore parity with other counties while keeping spending subject to audit and inmate-benefit limits. Both bills were laid out and left pending after testimony, with no public witnesses opposing them at the hearing. The committee also heard SB 330, which would require voter approval before counties over a certain size reduce prosecutor funding, similar to an existing law for law enforcement budgets. Supporters argued prosecutors are essential to public safety and need stable funding, while an opponent from the Texas Civil Rights Project said the bill would restrict local budget flexibility and impose costly elections. SB 663 would remove district judges’ approval role for community supervision and corrections department budgets, replacing it with judge review after TDCJ-CJAD approval; probation officials said the change would reduce delays and confusion without reducing judicial oversight. SB 1020 would require more immediate sharing of ankle-monitor violation information and clarify that such records are not judicial work product; the Harris County DA’s office and Crime Stoppers supported it, citing inconsistent local practices and delays that can hinder prosecutions. The committee then took up SB 1164 on emergency detention and court-ordered mental health services. The bill, from the Texas Judicial Commission on Mental Health, would update emergency detention forms, clarify officer duties, allow filings in the county where a person is apprehended or located, and add a factor related to a person’s inability to recognize symptoms or appreciate treatment risks. Supporters included family members, law enforcement, and mental health and judicial witnesses who described cases where earlier intervention might have prevented tragedy; opponents warned the broader language could be misused and emphasized due process and the need for dangerousness to remain the standard. SB 2111 on indigent defense would expand access to counsel at first hearings, strengthen managed assigned counsel programs, create internships and fellowships, and adjust other defense-related procedures; the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and county defense program leaders supported it, while the committee substitute removed some provisions to reduce fiscal impact. Finally, SB 2383 would let recently retired DPS officers return to work in limited roles to help address staffing shortages, and SB 2797 would create reciprocal discovery requirements for criminal cases; prosecutors and some committee members said it would reduce trial surprise and improve truth-seeking, while others questioned whether the bill fully matched the state’s disclosure obligations and whether it could burden defense rights. Several bills were left pending after testimony, and the committee established a quorum later in the hearing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Press Conference: Senator Mayes Middleton Aug 4th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And part of that was hearing Riley's story, and one of the things that she said really struck me.
  • Many of her teammates were upset.
  • Because of the danger involved, but also because of what it said about the erosion of women's protections
  • Many of them have long histories. of violent sex offenses, and California has 33.8% of the intended trends
  • I know the fear of being unable to escape and of not being heard when you ask for help.
Bills: SB15, SB9, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB15, SB9
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 4th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 4 relates to the composition of the districts for the election of members of the United States
  • House of Representatives from the state of Texas.
  • Please join us on this same channel for the next meeting of the Texas Senate.
  • On that, we stand in recess pending the receipt of committee reports.
Bills: SB15, SB9, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB4, SB8, SB60, SB15, SB9
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It extends the statute of limitations from two to three years and three to four years respectively.
  • Is there an issue with the statute of limitations?
  • So in those type of situations, just in general, it, at, Under the four-year statute of limitations that
  • But what happens is, is in the course of that, all of a sudden this. statute of limitations takes place
  • And then the issue is is either the statute of limitations has ran out or and the case is still pending
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It expands the definition of visual material in statute to include any printed or reproduced image or
  • If one of those two offenses is against a person of any age, as opposed to limiting it to against a child
  • And when Representative Little asked you about whether you think how remote it was, the statute of limitations
  • Accurate, which is why they want for you, why there's a statute of limitations, so that everything you
  • Yeah, and then to her point, there's no statute of limitations. ...somebody could say, "Hey, 20 years
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • First of all, we want to welcome everyone who's here today in support or opposition.
  • We are convening, of course, this morning at 10:30. We also have a session beginning.
  • So we will resume our hearing as soon as possible after we leave the floor, according to the terms of
  • A couple of other things, members: we've got a bill that... Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. What bill?
  • That we vote on are consistent and meet a pattern that is relative to the severity of the offense.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Retirement and Government Resources Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Retirement and Government Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • of limitations for that employee to sue the state for the difference between $100,000 and a million?
  • I don't know if it would address the statute of limitations.
  • A couple of things: one, this has already been in statute, and to our knowledge, has not been abused.
  • What we would be doing is pulling all the exemptions out of statute.
  • But the goal is to get it out of our statute and get all exemptions run through those state agencies
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Children and Senior Advocacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • an elderly person, they're exempt from any kind of windfall as far as inheritance, anything of that
  • an elderly person, they're exempt from any kind of windfall as far as inheritance, anything of that
  • No county official or agent of a county, or county officials is liable by reason of this section.
  • All those in favor, let it be known by saying I. following of the property. following of the property
  • <00:06:14.560> a county, county official or agent of a county, county official or agent of
Bills: HB9, HB52, HB53, HB99, HB9, HB52, HB53, HB99
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • of the kiosk.
  • We're grateful for the governor's further direction on limiting the scope of THC legislation to reasonable
  • of car accidents, because of abuse, because of overdose when it comes to over-consumption of alcohol
  • it is limited to immediate risk of death or serious. bodily injury.
  • has limits on the amount of funds that you can take from outside of the city in terms of donations.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Feb 2nd, 2026

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's no limit without having a license. This is one of the areas.
  • Under the Bill of Rights, under the existing Bill of Rights, there's a 180-day limitation period from
  • Senator, we need to limit time. I've given you a lot of flexibility here on your own bill.
  • We were one of the first states to ever put a victim's bill of rights in our statutes.
  • We were one of the first states to ever put a victim's bill of rights in our statutes.
Summary: The committee took up several criminal justice bills, beginning with SB 760 on violations of pretrial release conditions. A strike-all amendment narrowed the bill to make willful violation of a no-contact order a first-degree misdemeanor, authorize warrantless arrest on probable cause, and require detention until first appearance in certain cases. The amendment and the bill, as amended, were both adopted and reported favorably. The committee then heard SB 1536 on digital voyeurism, which would extend the expectation of privacy to backyards in the surveillance statute; it was reported favorably after brief questions and support from a Florida Smart Justice Alliance witness. Members next considered SB 1012 on inmate services. The bill would expand use of contractor-operated institutions inmate welfare trust funds for reintegration and facility upgrades, and would require reimbursement for inmate emergency and specialty medical services at Medicaid rates, with telehealth and autonomous APRNs included as options. Safety Net Hospital Alliance of Florida opposed the bill as written, warning that tying Medicaid participation to treatment of inmates could reduce reimbursement and discourage provider participation, while the Department of Corrections and Florida Smart Justice Alliance supported it. Senators discussed costs, aging inmates, and possible future changes, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee also passed CS for SB 600 on bail bond and pretrial release laws after adopting a strike-all that aligned it with the House companion and made technical changes to solicitation, training, and bond reinstatement rules. Public testimony raised concerns about who should receive returned bond money and how clerks would process payments, but the sponsor said the bill would continue to be refined. Later, the committee reconsidered and favorably reported SB 1750 on criminal sexual conduct, which increases penalties and mandatory minimums for serious sex crimes, especially those involving children. It also reconsidered and favorably reported SB 1544 on complaints against law enforcement and correctional officers, a bill requiring complainants to provide sworn complaints to officers before interrogation unless corroborating evidence is present; police chiefs and sexual violence advocates opposed parts of the bill, while supporters argued it would protect officers from unfounded complaints. Finally, SB 1488 on booking officer duties regarding minor children of arrested persons was reported favorably, and SB 1326 on prosecution of defamation was taken up for reconsideration with a delete-all amendment that narrowed the insanity defense, limited mitigation for severe mental illness in serious cases, and extended detention periods for incompetent defendants; opposition testimony from defense, public defender, and mental health advocates warned it would worsen treatment and increase costs.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Feb 27th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Said that uh pushing, uh, allowing the one branch of the federal government to define the limits of the
  • to work on some of the details of how it's affected mainly a majority instead of 2/3.
  • action relates to the enforcement of a state statute and the county attorney or district attorney requests
  • a state statute.
  • I will also say that in, uh, And, and the other, the other thing I've been an advocate of of of of Texans