Transcript Highlights:

• The bill requires health care providers to post...
• Across different providers and facilities.
• The LBB providing us a fiscal note, in other words.
• This model allows for providers to take on an amount of risk providing care for their patients in exchange
• It also provides guardrails to protect providers in contracting requirements and from retaliatory action

Bills: HB35, HB138, HB754, HB1314, HB1612, HB2254, HB2510, HB2789, HB3560, HB3597, HB4224, HB4273, HB4643, HB4783, HB138

Keywords: peer support, first responders, mental health, confidentiality, emergency services, health impact analysis, cost analysis, coverage mandates, health insurance, legislative analysis, health care data, human trafficking, trafficking prevention, medical assistant training, health care facilities, hospital compliance, clinic compliance, anti-retaliation, whistleblower protection, employee reporting

Transcript Highlights:

• Rural providers also depend on the larger health systems to provide our patient specialty services not
• So it did not provide, I believe, what the committee thought it provided in terms of support for small
• providers.
• protection—well, we're providing them some protection, but we're also providing... ...instead we're
• Madam Chair, reparation is what provides reimbursement for those offenses such as medical expenses, lost

Bills: HB99, HJR5, HM39, HB206, HB213, SB41, SB153, SB165, SB261, SB264

Keywords: medical malpractice, malpractice reform, patient's compensation fund, PCF, health care liability, tort reform, damage caps, punitive damages, hospital liability, physician liability, nurse practitioner, certified nurse-midwife, outpatient facility, ambulatory surgical center, urgent care, free-standing emergency room, insurance surcharge, superintendent of insurance, New Mexico hospitals, medical review process

Transcript Highlights:

• So it provided, it did not provide, I believe, what the committee thought it provided in terms of support
• for small providers.
• So it provided, it did not provide, I believe, what the committee thought it provided in terms of support
• for small providers.
• Reparation is what provides the reimbursement for those offenses, such as medical expenses, lost wages

Bills: HB99, HJR5, HM39, HB206, HB213, SB41, SB153, SB165, SB261, SB264

Keywords: medical malpractice, malpractice reform, patient's compensation fund, PCF, health care liability, tort reform, damage caps, punitive damages, hospital liability, physician liability, nurse practitioner, certified nurse-midwife, outpatient facility, ambulatory surgical center, urgent care, free-standing emergency room, insurance surcharge, superintendent of insurance, New Mexico hospitals, medical review process

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 99, a medical malpractice reform measure. Sponsor Chair Chandler and Minority Leader Armstrong described months of stakeholder negotiations aimed at balancing patient compensation with concerns from physicians, hospitals, and insurers about litigation costs, punitive damages, and access to care. The committee substitute kept the existing monetary damage caps but changed several provisions, including definitions of “occurrence” and “value of medical care,” treatment of future medical expenses, a higher clear-and-convincing standard for punitive damages, a two-step process before punitive damages can be pled, and a lower punitive-damages cap for smaller providers versus a higher cap for large hospital systems. Supporters said the bill would help recruit and retain doctors and stabilize the malpractice market; opponents argued it weakens accountability, especially for corporate and out-of-state hospital systems, and several speakers urged a stronger amendment to preserve patient rights. After debate, the committee voted 10-0 to give the House Judiciary Committee substitute for HB 99 a do-pass recommendation. The committee then heard House Joint Resolution 5, which would amend the state constitution to allow legislative compensation. Sponsors and supporters said paying legislators would make service more accessible to working people, parents, rural residents, and others without independent wealth, and would broaden representation. Several advocacy groups and individual commenters backed the proposal, while members raised questions about the pay formula, with the resolution tying compensation to the state median income. Some members supported the idea but preferred a salary commission or a different mechanism. The committee approved HJR 5 on a 7-3 vote. Finally, the committee began hearing House Memorial 39, which calls for a task force to study the current state of sexual assault examination kits and report on backlog progress. Sponsor Rep. Ferrari and the New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs explained that a prior task force a decade ago found more than 5,000 untested kits and led to policy changes, including the Sexual Assault Survivors Bill of Rights and a statewide tracking system. The memorial is intended to reassess whether backlogs remain and recommend further fixes.

Transcript Highlights:

• And those three providers have actually consolidated.
• The top 10 providers are still the same, and those three providers have actually consolidated and they
• It lists 180 providers.
• I think as to this, there is a national provider shortage, but the provider shortage here is so much
• in three okay criminal con is provided yeah.

Bills: HB99, HJR5, HM39, HB206, HB213, SB41, SB153, SB165, SB261, SB264

Keywords: medical malpractice, malpractice reform, patient's compensation fund, PCF, health care liability, tort reform, damage caps, punitive damages, hospital liability, physician liability, nurse practitioner, certified nurse-midwife, outpatient facility, ambulatory surgical center, urgent care, free-standing emergency room, insurance surcharge, superintendent of insurance, New Mexico hospitals, medical review process

Summary: The committee first took up a lengthy informational presentation on the Patient Compensation Fund (PCF) and New Mexico medical malpractice insurance. Teresa Hassey, a plaintiffs’ attorney, described the PCF’s origin in the 1976 Medical Malpractice Act, its role as a state-backed excess coverage system, and her view that it was mismanaged when hospital participation expanded without individualized risk assessments. She argued that hospitals underpaid surcharges, that the fund was depleted by claims, and that the 2021 amendments and later legislative infusions were meant to shore up deficits and phase hospitals out. Superintendent of Insurance Alice Kane and LFC analyst Julia Rodriguez presented a different perspective, emphasizing recent general fund infusions, current surcharge collections, the use of actuarial reviews, and the PCF’s budget and settlement activity. Kane said the market is highly concentrated, New Mexico’s malpractice costs and defense expenses are high, and the fund still provides lower-cost coverage than the open market, while also noting ongoing issues with future medical claims, TPA transition, and investment management. Committee members questioned the presenters at length about why New Mexico malpractice premiums are so high, whether defense costs were being conflated with claim payouts, how the PCF works with primary coverage and excess coverage, and whether hospitals were properly assessed when they entered the fund. Several senators raised concerns about punitive damages, corporate practice of medicine, and whether the state’s legal environment is driving doctors away. Others challenged the data comparisons, noting differences between one-year figures and multi-year averages, and asked why New Mexico’s costs remain far above neighboring states. Kane and Hassey disagreed on the causes, with Kane pointing to high claims and defense costs over time and Hassey arguing that hospital participation and punitive-damage exposure distorted the market. The chair concluded the discussion by saying the committee had not exhausted the topic and that he still wanted a clear path to reducing doctors’ insurance costs. After a break, the committee moved on to Senate Bill 41. Senator Charlie introduced the bill, which would eliminate the statute of limitations for the most serious sexual crimes in New Mexico. He argued that trauma, coercion, fear, and delayed disclosure often prevent survivors from reporting promptly, and said the law should reflect that reality. The bill was presented as a response to survivor testimony heard in a prior hearing, and the sponsor framed it as part of a broader effort to modernize the justice system for sexual violence cases.

Bills: SB279, HB478, SB279, HB478

Keywords: Alabama State House, Montgomery, Legislative Council, demolition, state capitol, state capitol building, historic preservation, state property, inventory removal, fixtures, furnishings, reuse, recycling, upcycling, surplus property, public assets, legislative chambers, desk sale, chair sale, state auditor

Transcript Highlights:

• package they provide to employees.
• a level playing field for all those in provider plans.
• For the state to step in and say, 'Hey, provide this minimum reimbursement.'
• And that's always an opportunity for a provider, a medical provider, to do that. It's...
• I'm looking at page 4, line 2, which talks about reimbursement for travel under the State Travel Reimbursement

Bills: HB3794, HB3796, HB3928, HB2955, HB4453, HB4460

Keywords: licensure, criminal history, public safety, occupational certification, rehabilitation, state regulations, insurance, regulations, certification, long-term care, mergers, consumer protection, property safety, vision insurance, optometry, reimbursement, healthcare policy, ophthalmic materials, provider agreements, captive insurance

Transcript Highlights:

• So I don't think it's going to provide a level playing field for all those provider plans.
• All those in provider plans. Go ahead, you're recognized.
• this minimum reimbursement.
• I'm looking at page 4, line 20, talks about reimbursement for travel under the State Travel Reimbursement
• who provided the services?

Bills: HB3794, HB3796, HB3928, HB2955, HB4453, HB4460

Keywords: licensure, criminal history, public safety, occupational certification, rehabilitation, state regulations, insurance, regulations, certification, long-term care, mergers, consumer protection, property safety, vision insurance, optometry, reimbursement, healthcare policy, ophthalmic materials, provider agreements, captive insurance

Summary: The committee first took up HB 3794 and HB 3796, both Oklahoma Insurance Department request bills. Members adopted PCS drafts for each without objection, heard brief explanations that the measures cleaned up and clarified insurance licensing and other statutory provisions, and then advanced both bills on unanimous or near-unanimous votes. The committee then considered HB 3928, as amended, which would require optometrists to be reimbursed at Medicare/Medicaid levels and address payment parity for certain vision plans. Representative Tedford raised concerns about premium increases and interference with private contracts, while the author argued the bill would create a fairer level playing field and would not significantly raise consumer costs. The bill passed on a recorded vote and was recommended to the next committee. HB 2955, updating the Oklahoma Captive Insurance Company Act to make Oklahoma more competitive, also passed after OID confirmed a questioned travel reimbursement provision was current law and unchanged. HB 4453 proposed creating an all-payers claims database board to analyze health care spending, use the health information exchange, and make recommendations to OID. The author described changes to board appointments and reporting language, and members asked about consumer representation, fiscal impact, and the board’s advisory role. The bill passed and was recommended onward. HB 4460, which would shift collection of copays, deductibles, and other cost-sharing from providers to insurers, drew extensive testimony from an emergency physician supporting the measure as a way to reduce medical debt and simplify billing, but members raised concerns about ERISA preemption, premium impacts, implementation, and broader market effects. After discussion, the author laid HB 4460 over for later consideration, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• by certain ambulance transport providers.
• An add-on rate is then applied, which increases the Medicaid reimbursement for providers' emergency ambulance
• It's very important for our providers.
• As we stated, the long delays in insurance reimbursement creates a significant hardship on our providers
• I am providing testimony on behalf of Dr.

Bills: SB5845, SB5916, SB6102, SB6071, SB6103, SB6159, SB5877, SB5967, SB5904, SB5915, SB6025

Keywords: health insurance, health carrier, insurance carrier, prompt pay, timely payment, claims processing, clean claim, remittance advice, provider reimbursement, hospital billing, medical billing, prior authorization, claims denial, interest on late claims, administrative penalty, Washington insurance commissioner, RCW 48, public employees benefits board, school employees benefits board, Medicaid managed care

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several health care bills. SB 6159 would create a public hospital infrastructure account funded by a new coverage assessment on insurers and other premium-tax payers, to help public hospital districts and other public health entities finance major construction and modernization projects and allow more cooperative agreements among public hospitals. The sponsor and supporters said it would help public hospitals remain competitive and better serve rural and underserved patients, while opponents argued the assessment would raise health care costs, could sweep in property and casualty insurers and mutual companies, and might create legal and affordability problems. Testimony also raised concerns that the bill’s cooperation language could unintentionally narrow existing affiliations with nonpublic entities. The hearing closed with 5 signed in pro, 74 con, and 2 other. The committee then heard SB 5845, which would replace the current 95% timely-payment standard with a requirement that all clean claims be paid or denied within 30 days, with notice requirements for incomplete claims and interest or penalties for late payment. Hospitals, physicians, and health systems strongly supported the bill, saying delayed and unpredictable payments create major cash-flow and administrative burdens and that some large claims can remain unpaid for months or longer even when care was approved. Health plans opposed the bill, saying they already meet current standards, that the bill could limit their ability to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse or review high-dollar claims, and that it should include more balanced timelines and exceptions. The hearing closed with 69 signed in pro, 4 con, and 2 other. The committee also heard SB 5916, which would prohibit health plans, Medicaid managed care organizations, and public employee plans from disadvantaging non-opioid pain treatments relative to opioids through formulary placement or utilization management, and would require a Department of Health educational pamphlet on non-opioid options. Patients, recovery advocates, and rare disease advocates supported the bill as a way to improve access to safer pain care and reduce barriers like prior authorization and step therapy. The Health Care Authority and an insurers’ representative said they support access to non-opioids but were concerned the bill could require preferred status for all non-opioids whenever any opioid is preferred, increasing costs and limiting formulary management. The hearing closed with 8 signed in pro, 1 con, and 2 other. Later, the committee heard SB 6102, a technical bill to align the ambulance transport quality assurance fee with federal rules after changes in federal law limited new provider taxes. The ambulance association supported the bill, saying the existing fee has significantly improved wages and benefits for EMS workers and that the change is needed to preserve the program. The hearing closed with 50 signed in pro, 1 con, and 0 other. The committee also heard SB 6103, which would make Medicaid payments for rural emergency hospitals subject to appropriation and create a state framework for a rural hospital conversion model. Supporters from East Adams Rural Health Care and the Washington State Hospital Association said the bill would help keep rural emergency services viable, especially for communities along the I-90 corridor. The hearing closed with 58 signed in pro, 1 con, and 0 other. Finally, the committee heard SB 6071, which would shorten the time limit for insurers to seek overpayment recoveries from providers from two years to six months, or nine months for coordination-of-benefits cases, extending a standard already enacted for mental health and substance use disorder services. Providers from acupuncture, massage, podiatry, and other small practices supported the bill, saying long clawback periods create financial instability and administrative burden, while the remaining testimony was still being taken when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each health plan providing coverage for medical and surgical services must also provide coverage for
• One example is reimbursement.
• One example is reimbursement.
• So when providers are told... One example is reimbursement.
• provider who will see their child.

Bills: SB6226, SB6305, SB5924, SB5990, SB5185, SB5845, SB6071, SB6258

Keywords: SB 6226, Washington, audiology, audiologist, hearing aid specialist, speech-language pathologist, telehealth, teleaudiology, clinical autonomy, clinical judgment, in-person care, remote care, Board of Hearing and Speech, hearing instruments, hearing aids, dispensing hearing aids, standards of care, professional licensure, health professions regulation, patient-centered care

Summary: The Senate Health and Long-Term Care Committee met on January 30 and first moved through executive session on five bills. The committee adopted proposed substitutes and advanced Senate Bills 5999, 5185, 5845, 6071, and 6258 to the Rules Committee, all by voice vote and subject to signatures. SB 5999 would let smaller rural counties appoint an APRN or PA as an acting local health officer; SB 5185 creates a pilot pathway for international medical graduates toward physician licensure; SB 5845 revises timely payment rules for health carriers; SB 6071 standardizes overpayment recovery timelines; and SB 6258 creates a non-disciplinary pathway for relinquishing certain medical licenses. Several sponsors noted that SBs 5845 and 6071 were still being worked on with stakeholders. The committee then held a hearing on SB 6226, which would protect the clinical autonomy of audiologists and require the Board of Hearing and Speech to apply hearing-instrument rules consistently across care modalities, including telehealth. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with witnesses emphasizing teleaudiology’s role in expanding access, especially for rural residents, older adults, and people with mobility challenges. One association witness supported the bill’s goals but warned it could be read too broadly and affect other regulatory standards. The hearing closed with 54 people signed in pro, none opposed, and two other. Next, the committee heard SB 6305, the Truth in Mental Health Coverage Act, which would require carriers to submit standardized annual data to the Office of the Insurance Commissioner on behavioral health coverage, access, reimbursement, utilization, and network participation, with public posting in raw files and dashboards. Supporters said the bill would make parity and access problems visible and help consumers compare plans; the OIC said it supported the transparency approach and was already engaged in parity oversight. Opponents argued the bill was premature given implementation of recent parity legislation and could add burdens without addressing workforce or network adequacy. The hearing closed with 396 signed in pro, two con, and zero other. Finally, the committee heard SB 5924, a proposed substitute expanding pharmacists’ prescriptive authority and limited diagnostic authority for certain drugs and conditions, consistent with a Department of Health sunrise review. Supporters from pharmacy, health care, retail, and rural access perspectives said it would reduce administrative barriers, improve access in underserved areas, and better use pharmacists’ training; some cited examples such as immunizations, contraception, opioid use disorder treatment, and minor illnesses. The Washington State Medical Association opposed the bill, saying it moved away from collaborative practice and needed more time to resolve concerns about coordination, pediatrics, and complex patients. A few testifiers raised objections to psychiatric prescribing or specific drugs, while others asked about reporting back to primary care. The hearing closed with 279 signed in pro, six con, and four other, and the committee adjourned after concluding its business.

Transcript Highlights:

• Beginning July 1, 2026, provider reimbursement will transition from attendance-based to enrollment-based
• And the fourth change is related to provider reimbursements.
• The payments are provided to reimburse districts for their bus purchases, regardless of the source of
• We are asking that you support Senate Bill 5923 to provide access to cost-based reimbursement for Island
• We are asking that you support Senate Bill 5923 to provide access to cost-based reimbursement for island

Bills: HB2689, SB5832, SB5922, SB5944, SB5988, SB6151

Keywords: Working Connections Child Care, child care subsidy, subsidized child care, Washington DCYF, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, low-income families, child care providers, licensed child care centers, family child care, market rate survey, subsidy rates, income eligibility, state median income, SNAP, Basic Food, collective bargaining, provider reimbursement, daily payment, half-day care, partial-day care

Bills: HB1845, HB2192, HB2438, HB2529, HB2607, HB2658, HB3348, HB3505, HB3305

Keywords: rural prosecution, salary assistance, staffing grant, legal support, criminal justice, fireworks, permit requirements, sale, county regulations, public safety, hospital district, administration, elections, director qualifications, public contracts, salary supplement, county judges, judicial functions, state law, government compensation

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> about the services our members provide. about the services our members provide.
• </c> providing service. providing service.
• But they have done extremely poor at<00:37:46.760><c> providing</c> at providing at providing the<00:
• Um, we had individual providers. We had provider associations.
• Um, we had individual providers. We had provider associations.

Bills: HF4110, HF4101, HF4144, HF3546

Keywords: workplace regulations, employee rights, meal breaks, rest breaks, exemptions, medical assistance, data matching, eligibility, reporting, human services, assisted living, health regulations, inspection authority, vulnerable adults, local government, program integrity, high-risk providers, enrollment requirements, fraud prevention, compliance

Transcript Highlights:

• In July 2026, provider payment will transition from a retroactive, attendance-based reimbursement system
• Senate Bill 6353 requires that a provider be reimbursed for up to 15 days if attendance is between 1
• I'm a provider of care of infantil.
• I'm a child care provider.
• I'm a child care provider.

Bills: SB5808, HB2254, HB2385, SB6006, SB6351, SB6198, SB6260, SB6353, SB5949, SB6129, SB6228, SB6231, SB6229, SB6173

Keywords: health insurance, premium assistance, funding, healthcare access, state budget, HB 2254, Washington, Health Care Authority, partnership access line, psychiatric consultation line, first approach skills training, behavioral health, mental health, assessment, administrative costs, health carriers, self-funded plans, multiple employer welfare arrangement, MEWA, employers

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> and patterns identified through provider and patterns identified through provider audits,<00:12:
• </c><00:19:20.400><c> the</c> going to continue to not provide the going to continue to not provide the
• ,</c> financial impacts both to uh providers, financial impacts both to uh providers, hospitals<00:31
• </c> legislature did include a provider legislature did include a provider enrollment<01:16:07.360><c
• </c><01:40:42.880><c> in</c> sure that we can support providers in sure that we can support providers

Bills: HF3379

Keywords: housing stabilization, disability services, predatory funding, provider requirements, housing accessibility, 1183, house

Bills: SB 302, SB 1335, SB 1734, SB 1760, SB 1975, SB 2127

Keywords: probate court, statutory judge, reimbursement, court costs, court proceedings, judicial assignments, judge assignment, cost reimbursement, judicial expenses, estate management, statutory requirement, court expenses, estates, inheritance, representative duties, court authority, personal representative, guardianship, incapacitated persons, guardianship fees

Transcript Highlights:

• authority</c> provides tribal providers the authority provides tribal providers the authority to<00:
• </c> impact, you know, providers? impact, you know, providers?
• </c> 10 you have to add a second provider. 10 you have to add a second provider.
• </c> the way that they're reimbursed. the way that they're reimbursed.
• provider shortage. In my own county, our provider shortage.

Bills: HF4438, HF4467, HF4379, SF3402, HF4349, HF4064, HF84, HF85, HF3804

Keywords: healthcare, WIC, community health, licensing, speech-language pathology, audiology, contract term limits, healthcare services, provider enrollment, disenrollment, premium payments, medical assistance, substance use disorders, mental health, children's mental health, early childhood, early intervention, consultation grants, Head Start, child care

Transcript Highlights:

• They allow them to provide the care they want to provide while also making sure that they are living
• They allow them to provide the care they want to provide while also making sure that they are living
• They allow them to provide the care they want to provide while also making sure that they are living
• > under</c> providers license and reimburse under providers license and reimburse under different different
• </c><01:39:09.400><c> under</c> reimbursement or we are reimbursed under reimbursement or we are reimbursed

Bills: HF2367, HF2319, HF2523, HF1742, HF671, HF2331, HF2722, HF2406, HF1674

Keywords: HF2367, Community First Services and Supports, CFSS, personal care assistance, PCA, consumer-directed community supports, CDCS, home and community-based services, HCBS, direct support professionals, direct care workers, caregivers, support workers, SEIU Healthcare Minnesota & Iowa, collective bargaining agreement, retention stipend, health care cost stipend, training stipend, orientation program, retirement trust

Transcript Highlights:

• from accessing the children care setting to provide early intervention services.
• This will truly provide a more stable and predictable child care supply.
• So what will be the reimbursement rate for someone who provides care 30 hours a day?
• So, for example, if there was a child care provider who.
• I mean a family child care provider I think is a very important and unique caregiver, provider, educator

Bills: SB132, SB241

Keywords: SB132, DOIT, Department of Information Technology, software replacement, equipment replacement, technology funding, revolving fund, capital equipment, enterprise services, state IT budgeting, software budgeting, amortization, depreciation, State Treasurer, Department of Finance and Administration, New Mexico, information technology, IT infrastructure, fund accounting, legislative appropriation

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, it provides a path forward for the lottery to be able to increase scholarship funding.
• So this will help us be able to grow and provide what our players want to play.
• So we're providing a stable benefit.
• So I think it provides that safety net, provides a little bit of room to grow, and the opportunity without
• So it would be close to a $90 million deficit surcharge recovery for the independent providers.

Bills: SB132, SB241

Keywords: SB132, DOIT, Department of Information Technology, software replacement, equipment replacement, technology funding, revolving fund, capital equipment, enterprise services, state IT budgeting, software budgeting, amortization, depreciation, State Treasurer, Department of Finance and Administration, New Mexico, information technology, IT infrastructure, fund accounting, legislative appropriation

Summary: The committee first heard HB 158 as amended, which would require state agencies receiving appropriations from the Grow Fund to submit accountability and evaluation plans to the State Budget Division and the Legislative Finance Committee. LFC staff said the bill would put existing practice into statute and formalize agency reporting and evaluation responsibilities. The bill drew no opposition testimony, and after questions about whether agencies or LFC would do the evaluations, it passed on a 9-0 due pass vote. HB 255, the Public Safety Workforce Building Program, was then presented as a bipartisan measure to consolidate public safety workforce funding into a competitive grant program for local law enforcement, fire, detention, and public attorney offices. The sponsor said it would not require a new appropriation. There was no opposition testimony, and the committee approved it on a 9-0 due pass vote. The committee then took up SB 309, which would replace the lottery’s 30% return requirement with a fixed floor return for several fiscal years, with a reversion to the current law if the floor is not met. Lottery officials and supporters argued the change would let the lottery offer more competitive prizes, including higher-value scratchers, and potentially increase scholarship revenue; opponents, including Think New Mexico and a nursing student, warned it could cap long-term growth and reduce scholarship funding. After extended debate, the bill passed on a 7-2 due pass vote. Later, SB 79, creating a statewide mosquito-borne disease prevention program through the Department of Health, was presented by its sponsor as a response to West Nile virus and warmer winters. Testimony from the sponsor and the state entomologist emphasized rising mosquito risk and the need for county grants and statewide coordination. Although the committee initially moved to table the bill because funding had already been included in the budget, that motion failed and the bill ultimately received a due pass vote. The committee also heard HB 295, which would create a centralized accessibility reporting position in the Department of Health; after testimony for and against, an amendment stripping the appropriation was adopted, and the bill passed 5-3. The committee then heard HB 124, establishing an Office of New Americans within Workforce Solutions to coordinate workforce integration for immigrants with lawful status. Supporters described barriers faced by immigrant workers and the need for bilingual training and centralized assistance, while the sponsor said the office would have no first-year budget impact. The bill passed 6-4. Finally, the committee considered SB 273 and SB 274, both involving state financial support for affected entities and the Patient Compensation Fund. SB 273, which would provide temporary state assistance to communities affected by economic disruption, passed after debate about precedent and economic recovery. SB 274, which sought repayment from the Patient Compensation Fund for prior state infusions, drew opposition from hospitals and physicians who warned of higher surcharges and questioned the timing and legality; discussion continued around the committee substitute and the fund’s statutory restrictions.

Transcript Highlights:

• c> to</c><00:02:16.920><c> providers</c><00:02:18.120><c> who</c> Provide a 10-day notice to providers
• Changing the services I provide and how they are provided.
• </c> that I provide. that I provide.
• </c> care providers that do. care providers that do.
• </c> Don't talk to the provider. Don't talk to the provider.

Bills: HF4491, HF4338, HF4288, HF4566

Keywords: Medical Assistance, Medicaid, prepayment review, claims review, fee-for-service, provider integrity, high-risk provider, high-risk service, fraud prevention, program integrity, Department of Human Services, CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, health care billing, medical claims, provider enrollment, Indian Health Service, Minnesota Statutes chapter 256B, human services, medical assistance