Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial transparency'

Page 4 of 459
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • the Texan values of liberty, personal responsibility, free enterprise, balanced with safety and transparency
  • committee substitute adds current and former employees and commissioners of the State Commission on Judicial
  • I am the general counsel for the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • I serve on the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, and I too want to express my appreciation to Senator
  • So that provision allows court staff, or clerk staff, or Judicial Conduct Commission staff to use their
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The substitute also removes the judicial remedies that require the tenant's rent to be paid into the
  • We provide health guarantees, vet checks, and breeder transparency.
  • Senate Bill 2677 is a transparency and regulatory bill for an industry that is currently not transparent
  • Used responsibly and fully transparent on how they operate, it may be a good vehicle.
  • We agree with the portion of this law that mandates the use of transparency.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Administrative Rules REVISED: Link added Mar 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Administrative Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial and public safety are approving the rules submitted by February 1st due date for the agencies
Bills: HJR1086, SB392
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judicial Retention - 2025-03-20 - 10:30AM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're in a place where transparency is the most important number one priority. One issue.
  • Watching on TV thinks that government should be transparent, but the analysis, the reports, the EI, and
  • You don't want to be transparent to people? I thought you were going to be accountable to us.
  • does need to hear the evidence, and maybe our constituents, the ones that you don't want to be transparent
  • There is nothing that is not transparent in this process.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • hand of safety upon the people of Texas, our fellow members in the House, the Executive Branch, the Judicial
  • I mean, the judicial recourse isn't all that great either.
  • I think that the people of the state of Texas deserve a little bit more transparency.
  • I think that the people of the state of Texas deserve a little bit more transparency.
  • Here, the difference is that it was transparent.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • To interested parties, SB 2459 protects the personal information of certain judicial branch officers
  • This essential security measure is missing from our current Texas judicial security laws.
  • Judicial Security Act of 2017. Thanks to all of you for passing this very important legislation.
  • 522,022 general threats, 29 assaults, and 68 bomb threats made towards judges and court personnel. ...judicial
  • Senate Bill 3055 also aims to bring transparency to the delegation process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • What House Bill 2884 promotes is civil transparency and civil action.
  • allowing the sequestering of potential jurors from counties that are contiguous to and in the same judicial
  • The Judicial District, as a summoning county, doesn't change the standards that qualify you to serve
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) May 1st, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • entities in their lawsuits against defense contractors, and and what HB 2884 promotes is civil transparency
  • counties by allowing to sequester potential jurors from counties that are contiguous to and in the same judicial
  • , uh, judicial district as a summoning county, doesn't change the standards that served that qualify
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • harder than I have to make sure judges are adequately paid, that we preserve the prerogative of the judicial
  • This bill addresses the lack of actionable prosecution data by requiring the Texas Judicial Council to
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
  • A mandate in the bill, it is rather the bill sets up a process by which the Texas Judicial Council will
  • I know it's not, like, the transparency on these things is always critical, but the community that these
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Aug 20th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Bills: HB16
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met with a quorum present and took up House Bill 16, the omnibus courts bill that had been vetoed by the governor after the regular session. The committee substitute made several changes, including moving certain court creation dates, creating a new county court at law for Maverick County, repealing a missed youth diversion article, removing a civil preference for the 456th District Court in Guadalupe County, clarifying the digital court recording study makeup, correcting a drafting error involving prosecutors in the Special Prosecution Unit, and allowing the Office of the Attorney General to represent SPU prosecutors. Megan LaVoie of the Office of Court Administration testified as a resource witness in support of the bill and thanked the committee for working with the judiciary on the measure. Steve Bresnan of the Texas Court Reporters Association also testified in support of the bill, but used his time to urge action on a separate anti-SLAPP appeal that he said had been pending for 47 months; he distributed materials and proposed an amendment to impose deadlines on the courts, though he said he was not expecting discussion of it that day. After public testimony closed, the committee adopted the substitute without objection. Representative Hayes moved that House Bill 16, as substituted, be reported favorably to the full House with the recommendation that it be passed and printed. The motion prevailed on a 10-0 vote, and the committee then adjourned.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • what you still have is the Court of Criminal Appeals, the experts in criminal law within the Texas judicial
  • I'm the Judicial District Attorney for the 106th Judicial District, which covers four counties in rural
  • that constitutional provision dates from 1891, which was the year that the current structure of our judicial
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met and heard several bills related to legislative process and court jurisdiction. Senate Bill 1386, by Senator Huffman, would change compelled legislative testimony from blanket transactional immunity to testimonial immunity, allowing compelled statements or documents to be used against a witness in criminal prosecution only if not derived from the compelled testimony, while preserving protection against perjury and false statements and retaining the right to counsel. No public witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1470, by Chairman Hughes, which would require DPS to share existing data on cross-state driver’s license cancellations with the Secretary of State for voter-roll maintenance. Hughes said the bill does not create new data collection and is intended to improve list maintenance. A DPS resource witness was present, there was no substantive opposition, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1210, also by Hughes, would address conflicts between the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutional questions by making the Supreme Court the final arbiter in limited circumstances. Chris Hilton supported the bill, but Allen Place, Jack Rohde, and Philip Furlow opposed it, arguing it was unconstitutional, unnecessary, and could create practical problems in criminal post-conviction litigation. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 311, which would conform the Government Code to the Texas Constitution by clarifying the Supreme Court’s original writ authority against lower courts and officials other than the governor. Justice Evan Young and Chris Hilton supported the bill as a clarification of existing authority, while no one testified against it; the bill was left pending. The committee then recessed to allow the chamber to rearrange for the Senate session.