Video & Transcript Research : 'filing fee'

Page 4 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • On the basis of filing an application for a place on the general primary election ballot or for nomination
  • previously relating to the declaration of candidacy and candidates' ineligibility on the basis of filing
  • What the law currently says is that if that form is filled out, it has to be filed with our office, and
  • None of the forms have been filed with our office yet.
  • We'll also clean up some small parts of the filed version.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have paid this filing fee to the Secretary of State's office.
  • I pay my fees in $1 bills. To give you an idea, the filing fee for the U.S.
  • We have people who file their application for nomination, but they don't pay the filing fee and they
  • We are asking to submit our filing fees in the...
  • I oppose charging third parties filing fees because filing fees in the Republican and Democratic Party
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • We're changing it to a use-and-file from a file-and-use.
  • rate that's being filed, it has no impact on that rate that's being filed.
  • be centered on file-and-use.
  • It doesn't change anything else, just the timing of rate-and-file or file-and-use to use-and-file from
  • use-and-file.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC Public Hearing 02-06-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It should read that the ICA terminated 599 primary cases while 503 new cases were filed in fiscal year
  • Trial court clerks request extensions of time to file records on appeal.
  • Trial court clerks request extensions of time to file records on appeal.
  • So, this is basically a filing. So, this is basically a housekeeping<00:46:42.240> measure.
  • So there, this requires that certain forms be filed electronically. I see.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 2444 would raise the real property exemption amount for attachment or execution, which the Attorney General said could create vague retroactivity language and litigation risk; the committee noted the exemption had last been adjusted around 1978. SB 2446 would add a seventh associate judge to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Judiciary staff testified in opposition, saying recent internal restructuring and a pending vacancy had improved output and that it would be prudent to wait and see the effect before adding another judge. The Public Defender supported the goal of faster appellate resolution but said it would defer to the court’s assessment and had no objection to revisiting the issue later. The committee also discussed current appellate timelines, with staff saying at least 225 days is built into the process before a case reaches a merit panel, and that a two-year delay from panel assignment was realistic under the current structure. The committee then heard SB 2450, which would establish a presidential preference primary for the 2028 cycle. The Chief Election Officer said the election would cost about $4 million, less if combined with the regular primary. Several opponents argued the bill would add bureaucracy, duplicate or undermine party-run processes, and waste taxpayer money; one speaker estimated the total cost could be closer to $6 million when county costs are included. Supporters and committee members discussed that the measure would not require parties to use the results and that Hawaii remains one of the few states still using caucuses. The committee also asked whether counties could staff the election and whether the results would be useful given Hawaii’s current primary timing. SB 2453 would require the Office of Elections to include a notice with each ballot that a digital and printed voter information guide is available, with the notice in 32-point font as a separate insert. The Chief Election Officer said the insert would cost about $90,000 and asked for an effective date of January 1, 2027 because mailing preparations for the primary would already be underway. The Disability and Communications Access Board, League of Women Voters, National Federation of the Blind of Hawaii, and others supported the bill. The committee also began hearing SB 2461, which would have the Office of Elections prepare a questionnaire for candidates and publish responses online and in the voter guide; the Chief Election Officer said the office did not think it should be the agency to shape campaign questions, though he said it could work if the questions were specified in statute. Finally, the committee heard SB 2457, which would require a criminal conviction before seized property could be forfeited. The Attorney General and Honolulu Police Department opposed the bill, arguing it would prolong cases, increase storage costs, and make forfeiture less effective against crime, especially where owners flee, die, or hide assets through shell companies. The Public Defender strongly supported the measure, saying forfeiture should be tied to convictions and that people challenging forfeiture often lack counsel. The Honolulu Prosecutor also opposed the bill, but said it supported transparency, due process, and even a right to counsel; it argued conviction-only forfeiture would fail in cases involving fugitives, deceased suspects, or hidden ownership structures. The committee questioned what would happen to property if an owner could not be found, and the prosecutor said the outcome would depend on the type of property and could involve abandonment or interpleader proceedings.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are other fees that this bill addresses, like the right to a fee for appeal, and in my view, we
  • In Arizona, however, there is a fee for some of these and the ability to charge a fee for others.
  • However, there is a fee for some of these and the ability to charge a fee for others.
  • This bill removes that fee and blocks future fees on any constitutional rights that we have.
  • collection of the fees.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2415, which would tighten Arizona’s regulation of kratom by treating synthetic or highly concentrated 7-OH products as narcotic drugs, raising the legal sale age to 21, and imposing criminal penalties for prohibited sales or preparation. Supporters, including the sponsor, a recovering user, the American Kratom Association, and the Attorney General’s Office, argued the bill targets dangerous synthetic products while preserving natural kratom leaf products. Opponents, including the Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, warned the amendment could sweep in users and create harsh felony penalties for possession. The committee adopted the Wynn amendment and then gave HB 2415 as amended a 6-3 do-pass recommendation. The committee then considered HB 2870, which would bar multiple Level 2 or Level 3 registered sex offenders from living together in the same residence unless they are related by blood, marriage, or adoption. The sponsor and neighborhood witnesses described a local home with six or seven offenders and said the arrangement frightened nearby families and children. Opponents argued the bill would destabilize housing for people on probation, increase homelessness, and interfere with supervision and rehabilitation; some also noted existing probation oversight and low sexual recidivism rates. After debate over whether the bill should instead target only certain housing settings, the committee voted 5-4 to give HB 2870 a do-pass recommendation. Next, HB 2413 was heard, requiring GPS or electronic monitoring for registered sex offenders who do not have a fixed address until one is established. Supporters said the bill would close a gap for homeless or transient registrants who otherwise report only every 90 days, while opponents raised due process, cost, and implementation concerns, noting that some offenders are already monitored through probation and that DPS does not itself supervise offenders. The committee passed HB 2413 on a 5-4 vote. The committee also heard HB 2720, which increases the penalty for purchasing prostitution to a class 6 felony and directs a $200 assessment to the anti-human trafficking fund. Supporters said it targets buyers and helps deter trafficking demand; opponents argued the bill could still ensnare trafficking victims and sex workers. The committee adopted a Bliss amendment clarifying the affirmative defense and use of funds, then approved HB 2720 as amended by an 8-0 vote with one member present. Finally, HB 2418, appropriating $600,000 from the General Fund to the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission for five major incident division task forces, was supported by county sheriffs’ representatives and passed unanimously by the committee.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Insurance Committee Jan 28th, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • on that second or or additional fees on that second or third<00:14:42.399> diagnostic.
  • Is it a um because I Is it a flat fee?
  • And, you know, there may be an insurance claim ultimately filed by the homeowner.
  • charged a fee charged a fee uh<00:31:19.520> for<00:31:20.320> for<00:31:20.720>
  • claim ultimately filed by the homeowner. claim ultimately filed by the homeowner.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Consumer and Public Affairs Feb 10th, 2026 at 06:48 pm

House Consumer & Public Affairs

HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, our testimony somehow was not filed correctly. Chip stands in strong support of this measure.
Summary: The House Committee on Health heard testimony on a series of bills related to public health, pharmacy regulation, disability access, and health care infrastructure. HB 1535, creating an income tax credit for automated external defibrillator installations, drew support from the Department of Health, tax department comments, and public testimony emphasizing AED access in community and transit settings. HB 1765, requiring safety warnings for spear fishing gear, received comments from DLNR and strong support from a free-diving safety advocate who described blackout risks and argued for point-of-sale warnings. HB 1549, which would repeal the law prohibiting drug paraphernalia, drew mixed testimony: the Department of Health, the Public Defender, and harm-reduction advocates supported repeal as a public health measure, while HPD and a county prosecutor opposed it, warning it could encourage drug use and create public safety issues. The committee also heard HB 1550, which would exclude drug testing products from the definition of drug paraphernalia. The Department of Health and harm-reduction advocates supported the bill, saying drug checking tools save lives and help prevent overdoses, while one written opponent was noted. HB 1995, allowing people who are blind or deaf to receive disabled parking permits, drew opposition from the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, the Disability and Communication Access Board, and other opponents, while a few written supporters were also noted. HB 1671, allowing licensed dental hygienists to place interim therapeutic restorations in public health settings, received support from the Department of Health and several oral health organizations, with the Board of Dentistry offering comments. HB 1643, establishing a framework for pharmacy audits and record retrieval, prompted the most extended discussion. The Board of Pharmacy and independent pharmacy representatives supported the bill as a needed framework to limit burdensome audits and protect patient care, while HMSA raised concerns about possible conflicts with upcoming federal PBM reforms and potential unintended consequences. Committee members questioned both sides about timing and workload, and supporters argued the bill was needed now to protect rural and independent pharmacies. Finally, HB 1978, appropriating funds for a new outpatient care center in North Kona, received strong support from Hawaii Health Systems Corporation, Queen’s Health Systems, the Kona-Kohala Chamber, and others, who described it as a long-term investment in West Hawaii’s health care capacity and economy. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm sure it is Julian Alvarez and you're here to test file behalf of yourself and you're for the bill
  • Members, this bill relates to student access to certain academic records, authorizing a fee.
  • I filed HB 3148 because of concerns... brought to me by schools and families in my district, that the
  • I filed HB 3148 because it's time to consider whether the current form of the top 10 percent plan is
  • College application fees alone can be a deterrent. current for prospective students.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fee has not changed since 1980, number one.
  • where the fee is.
  • But fee-wise, it would be in line with university fees. Thank you. Yes, sir. Okay.
  • They would see the same increase because it would be a mandatory fee.
  • I think it's the shortest bill I've ever filed.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Transportation, Highways and Public Works May 14th, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Public Works

Transcript Highlights:
  • And a license is reinstated once all the fees are paid? Witness: Yes.
  • Witness: There isn't a fiscal note, but of course there were fees for the first three late fees, so there
  • I'll ask you online here: is that, I mean, we're raising fees on one.
  • I'm interested in putting a voluntary fee on for litter abatement.
  • So this is all a convenience fee. Somebody agrees to pay this voluntarily.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And for the banking department, it's been 20 years since they've had a fee increase.
  • So to adjust for inflation, the fee goes from $3,000 to $4,000 for an original license, and then the
  • The 10,000-foot view of the picture of what we're trying to solve is charging a fee for services already
  • I think that was the intent of the original statute back in the 2013 pass that prohibited response fees
  • , and then when charges are filed, they will go to court and testify as to why they were arrested.