Video & Transcript Research : 'fee exemption'

Page 4 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Transportation May 7th, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Public Works

Transcript Highlights:
  • That was one of the To charge them fees.
  • and what was not exempt, whether it was fire vehicles or police vehicles or whatnot.
  • I know we went through this and all the $25 fees. So did they refund everybody? They’re $25 before?
  • This is dealing right now—the farm equipment is exempt from state law, most of state law.
  • And what this does is remove that exemption. Yes, sir.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Transportation and Public Works met with five members present and approved the April 29, 2026 minutes. The committee then heard and favorably reported several bills, including HB 1233, which lowers the contract threshold for hospital service districts to use the Seymours program for certain hospital construction projects, and HB 715, which requires aerial applicators operating from public airports to have a transponder and radio; an amendment removing language about airport use of ADS-B data for fees was adopted after sponsors said the issue would be handled in another bill. HB 999 was reported favorably to allow impoundment of out-of-state vehicles operated in Louisiana without liability insurance, and HB 692 was amended to let parishes and municipalities use group purchasing organizations, with a narrowing amendment limiting one-source procurements and assurances that local bidders would not be disadvantaged. The committee also advanced HB 511, creating a grant program for pursuit intervention technology in response to officer safety concerns, and HB 590, which would let OMV issue specialized envelopes or notices for drivers with autism or other disabilities so officers are alerted during traffic stops. HB 503 was reported favorably after a local cleanup change to a golf cart bill for Golden Meadow, and HB 655 was approved to let DOTD use cost-plus contracts for operation and maintenance of state-owned ferries. HB 748 clarified that school board-owned or leased vehicles are exempt from tolls, and HB 860 would allow fillable electronic bids for local government procurement. Later, the committee approved HB 896, a major tolling-related cleanup bill for Plaquemines Parish that addresses customer service center access, administrative fees, and exemptions, with members and local officials criticizing the toll structure and its impact on the parish. HB 1000 was reported favorably as a cleanup measure tied to highway priority program reporting and local district contract limits. HB 887 established a more consistent scoring and ranking process for Seymour projects, with an amendment to avoid conflict with changing FAA grant rules. HB 888, a cleanup bill on temporary tags, was amended with added security features and then reported favorably. HB 1086, a broad electronic title and registration modernization bill, received a lengthy amendment set but was voluntarily held over for a week so members could review the new language. The committee also advanced HB 776 to expand the Port Priority Program to larger projects, with amendments clarifying flexibility and removing private projects from the bill. HB 707 was reported favorably to let the Department of Agriculture and Forestry handle promotional activities for the liquefied petroleum gas commission through a cooperative endeavor agreement. HB 868, a farm safety bill requiring safety chains or other manufacturer-specified equipment on trailers, was reported favorably after testimony about a fatal accident and assurances it would not change engineering standards beyond existing manufacturer requirements. Finally, HB 856 was amended to authorize indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracting for DOTD maintenance and construction work, then reported favorably, and the committee later corrected the record on HB 856 by reconsidering and withdrawing one technical amendment set so further floor cleanup could be made. The meeting adjourned without objection.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Finance and Taxation Apr 8th, 2025 at 09:00 am

Finance and Taxation

Bills: HB1428
Summary: The Finance and Tax Committee met with a quorum and took up House Bill 1482, which would require certain municipal bond elections to be held on primary or general election days rather than at special elections. Senator Rummel walked the committee through a proposed amendment from Representative Wagner that would remove special-election language, align ballot timing requirements, and make related cleanup changes. Members discussed the distinction between constitutional debt limits and the bill’s election-timing requirements, with Senator Powers seeking clarification that the measure did not change levy or bond limits themselves. The committee also discussed whether the amended language would comply with the Secretary of State’s requirements. Chairman Weber and Senator Rummel said they had consulted legislative council and wanted a further check before the bill moved forward, and the chairman said he would hold the bill until that review was complete. The amendment was approved unanimously, 6-0, and the bill as amended was then adopted unanimously, 6-0. After passage, the committee discussed who would carry the bill, eventually settling on Senator Rummel as carrier. The chair also said several other bills, including gas tax and property tax measures, would be held for the time being while the committee waited for developments in the House. The committee announced it would not plan to meet the next day unless called from the floor, and then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • They would be able to look at the fee schedule; the number would be there, and that would be the rate
  • schedule the number would be at the fee schedule the number would be there<00:09:07.959> and<
  • The other side of the question is that when we do this, this would impact fee-for-service.
  • Because I've seen in the past managed care organizations sometimes pay more than fee-for-service, but
  • <00:53:01.640> and at least 100% of the Medicare fee and at least 100% of the Medicare fee
Bills: HF1005
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 27th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a $100 fee, as I understand it.
  • So if they do less than that, they're exempt from paying the fee, and it does not apply...
  • So if they do less than that, they're exempt from paying the fee, and it does not apply to prescription
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
Bills: SB38, SB46, SB18
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation Apr 20th, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, House Bill 1242 adds ser a day to our ag sales tax exemption along Thank you, Mr. Chair.
  • The interest earned on these accounts is also exempt from income tax.
  • companies that are private in nature can work with nonprofits and that will not harm their tax exemptions
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 935 only exempts counties from paying the motor fuel tax if the gas or diesel is sold in the county
  • Unfortunately, counties aren't exempt from paying into this fund, so many counties pay more into the
  • It extends the R&D franchise tax credit program and repeals the insufficient sales tax exemption.
  • So we treat the work as exempt to some extent and then pay tax on the total contract.
  • All other aviation categories are already exempt, including commercial.
WY
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Revenue Committee, February 10, 2026

Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • homeowners exemption? homeowners exemption?
  • It could be the veterans exemption. It could be multiple exemptions.
  • . exemption. exemption.
  • exemption the amount of the exemption exemption the amount of the exemption shall<01:17:59.199><
  • exemptions are of the assessed value. exemptions are of the assessed value.
Bills: HB0045
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 11th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • Why are we, why are we imposing a fee and giving a grant?
  • And the second fee was to incentivize the producer.
  • , the fees in the bill or what their recommendations were.
  • Can we, what is an acre fee?
  • Um, then it's exempt from Avalorm taxation, but if I buy it from my neighbor.
Bills: HB294
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Vets Committee Meeting - 2026-03-25

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • It also authorizes the commissioner to establish a fee schedule to help offset the cost of burial.
  • Removing the fees simply lowers costs for our disabled veterans.
  • Removing the fees simply lowers costs for our disabled veterans.
  • They're not going to have to fees. They can just designate disability. Is that correct?
  • They're not going to have to fees.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 31st, 2026 at 09:07 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Update certain agricultural fees. Senate Bill 143.
  • In some instances, fee caps have not been addressed in 50 or more years.
  • Is this a renewal fee as well? Farms or the ranches.
  • rulemaking in the future to raise that fee in rule.
  • It does not necessarily raise the fees.
Bills: SB47, SB110, SB122, SB143, SB168
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Transportation, Highways and Public Works May 14th, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Public Works

Transcript Highlights:
  • And a license is reinstated once all the fees are paid? Witness: Yes.
  • Witness: There isn't a fiscal note, but of course there were fees for the first three late fees, so there
  • I'll ask you online here: is that, I mean, we're raising fees on one.
  • I'm interested in putting a voluntary fee on for litter abatement.
  • So this is all a convenience fee. Somebody agrees to pay this voluntarily.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/10/25 - Part 2

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the fee also administering the fee the fee also creates<00:31:43.880> some<00:31:44.120> confusion
  • If we were to do this where we eliminated all those exemptions and reduced the fees, so let's say it
  • No one wants fees increased.
  • No one wants fees increased.
  • No one wants fees increased.
Bills: HF5
Summary: The Transportation Committee resumed consideration of House File 5, which would reduce transportation-related revenues while also providing tax relief, including a subtraction for Social Security income, elimination of the delivery fee, and a cap on automatic gas tax indexing. The committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which added the phrase “using existing resources,” and then proceeded to public testimony. Representative Joy described the bill as making Minnesota more affordable, while several members and testifiers raised concerns about the impact on transportation funding and road maintenance. MnDOT Commissioner Nancy Doppenberg testified that reductions in planned transportation investments would worsen pavement, bridge, and roadway conditions, reduce construction projects and jobs, and add to an already large funding gap. Committee discussion focused on the estimated revenue losses from the bill, including about $45 million in fiscal year 2026 and $55 million annually from repealing the delivery fee, plus additional losses from capping gas tax indexing, for a combined transportation revenue reduction of about $131 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Members also asked about bridge aesthetics, paint, transit impacts, and whether other mandates and cost increases should be considered alongside revenue reductions. Supporters of the delivery fee repeal, including the Minnesota Grocers Association and Minnesota Retailers Association, argued the fee is costly to administer, confusing to consumers, and disproportionately burdens small businesses and lower-income or disabled consumers who rely on delivery. The Minnesota Association of Townships and the Minnesota Transportation Alliance emphasized that rural and local governments face major road and bridge funding needs and warned that reducing revenue would shift costs to property taxpayers or leave projects unfunded. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the committee continued with testimony and member questions.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/10/25 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The no-fee transaction payment to service providers.
  • for transactions that currently do not have a fee.
  • for transactions that currently do not have a fee.
  • That currently do not have a fee associated with it.
  • <01:25:56.600> or dealer uh currently that exemption or dealer uh currently that exemption
Bills: HF5
Summary: The committee began with member and staff introductions, then heard an overview of the governor’s transportation budget recommendations from fiscal staff Andy Lee. He explained that the spreadsheet showed only proposed changes, not base spending, and highlighted General Fund and trunk highway adjustments for MnDOT and the Department of Public Safety, including operating changes, extensions of prior appropriations, increased state road construction and Blatnik Bridge authority tied to anticipated federal funds, State Patrol hiring and a metro headquarters item, aeronautics changes, and revenue adjustments in the Driver and Vehicle Services special revenue account. The main testimony came from Metropolitan Council Chair Charlie Zelle, who outlined three budget-related items: advancing funds to MnDOT to help coordinate a highway reconstruction with a transitway project, making Metro Mobility riders eligible for free fixed-route transit, and reducing the Metro Transit general fund appropriation by $32.454 million annually. He said the advance would speed delivery and reduce disruption, the free-fare pilot had been successful and could save money if even a small share of Metro Mobility trips shifted to fixed-route service, and the general fund reduction was manageable in the near term because of new revenue streams but could constrain future expansion and capital maintenance. Members questioned the long-term effects of the proposed reduction, possible impacts on safety, service expansion, and capital maintenance, and whether federal funding uncertainty could affect operations and bus procurement. Zelle said the cuts would not affect immediate operations but could limit future BRT, microtransit, and transitway expansion, while also noting that capital maintenance needs include platform rebuilds, track work, rolling stock, and station repairs. He also said the 2023 funding package had accelerated projects and that the council was opening three transit lines this year. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided.