Video & Transcript Research : 'digital manipulation'

Page 4 of 239
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • So for the digital portion of it, how would that work?
  • So I guess I'm just wondering about the digital portion when the rider gets the choices for the ride,
  • So is it like, like she said, there's an app, so is there like a... when you digitally choose a taxi
  • Like when you digitally choose a taxi ride, as opposed to what we like to see in movies when you hail
Bills: SB507
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Children and Youth Health Committee Feb 27th, 2025

Children and Youth Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • What we're dealing with here today is a digital package where kids can go to these stores and obtain
  • We're here to try to protect our children from the digital version of what we already protect them from
  • obscenities and keep them out of the way of predators and human traffickers who hunt our kids in digital
  • I'm an attorney with the Digital Childhood Alliance. I worked at the U.S.
Bills: SB186, SB187
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/11/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The same than the digital retail market.
  • Digital formats are essential for patrons with visual or reading impairments.
  • prices for audiobooks through digital prices for audiobooks through digital audiobook<00:14:31.440
  • Digital access has expanded how people read and listen to books.
  • distinguishing between print and digital distinguishing between print and digital in<00:26:07.760
Bills: HF3698, HF3067, HF3730
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Wed Mar 18, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moving on to SB 2387 SD1 relating to digital financial asset transaction kiosks.
  • This establishes limits on transactions through digital financial asset transaction kiosks.
  • Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities in support. through digital financial asset through
  • digital financial asset transaction<00:37:36.520> kiosks.
  • After activities of digital and 14.
Summary: The committee heard SB 1166 SD2, a bill on insurance and climate-related damages that would authorize the Hawaii Property Insurance Association and, in amended versions discussed during testimony, other public and private entities to pursue civil actions to recover losses tied to climate disasters and extreme weather. DCCA’s Insurance Division and the Department of the Attorney General raised legal concerns, saying the bill’s scope may not fit the insurance code section being amended, that it could create subject-matter and title issues, and that some subrogation language may be duplicative of existing rate-filing practice. Lawyers for Justice opposed the measure, arguing it conflicts with existing subrogation law and recent Hawaii Supreme Court rulings that treat the judicial lien process as the exclusive remedy. The American Petroleum Institute also opposed, warning the bill would add liability and litigation risk for companies operating under existing permits and could undermine energy reliability and investment. Supporters said the bill would help shift climate-related insurance costs away from residents and onto fossil fuel companies and other responsible parties. Testimony in support came from the Polluters Pay Hawaii Coalition, Center for Climate Integrity, Hawaii Island Council, Our Hawaii, Sierra Club of Hawaii, and others, who described recent flooding, storm damage, rising premiums, non-renewals, and underinsurance as evidence of a worsening climate-driven insurance crisis. Several supporters urged amendments to give the Attorney General explicit authority to recover insurance-related losses for the Hurricane Relief Fund, HPIA, and private insurers, and to ensure recovered amounts benefit policyholders. Committee members questioned whether HPIA is a private entity, whether the Attorney General could represent it, whether the bill could create double recovery or affect pending climate litigation, and whether insurers would have standing or damages if they are only paying contractual claims. The committee then took up SB 888 SD2, a consumer protection bill that would restrict smart household security device operators from sharing user data with law enforcement without consent or a judicial order, and would bar conditioning device use on such consent. The Office of Consumer Protection testified in support and said an Illinois law could serve as a useful template for exceptions to the warrant requirement. An individual supporter said the measure would protect immigrant communities, judges, and others from surveillance and misuse of private data. No vote was taken during the portion of the meeting provided, and the chair noted additional written testimony submitted in support of SB 1166.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • at targeting sophisticated financial crimes and scams, and will am... up civil asset forfeiture of digital
  • Chairman, 1498. aims to expand law enforcement's asset forfeiture capabilities to encompass digital.
  • Digital currency has become the preferred method for money laundering as well. widely used for contraband
  • The bill seeks to establish clear definitions and procedures for the forfeiture of digital currency.
  • It is then transferred to a digital wallet controlled by the criminal.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

ECD Public Hearing - Fri Feb 6, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST

Economic Development & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • relating to the motion picture digital relating to the motion picture digital media<01:00:48.000
  • Um so digital service versus UGC's.
  • Um so digital service providers providers providers um<01:21:20.640> controlling<01:21:21.360>
  • We support critical IT infrastructure within the state, and we also support the emerging digital ...
  • We also support the emerging digital services.
Summary: The committee opened testimony on House Bill 1838, relating to visas. Testifiers from the State Health Planning and Development Agency, the legal clinic, the Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, the ACLU, CARES, and immigrant-rights groups strongly supported the bill, saying it would bring Hawaii into compliance with federal law, standardize and speed up certification for U and T visa applicants, and better protect survivors of crime and trafficking. Supporters emphasized that delays in certification can leave eligible survivors waiting years for federal visa access and can undermine public safety by discouraging victims from reporting crimes. The chair announced there were 103 testimonies in support and one in opposition, and the committee then moved on without taking a vote on the bill in the hearing. The committee next heard House Bill 1870, concerning protected locations and immigration enforcement. Testimony from the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, ACLU of Hawaii, educators, students, and community advocates supported limiting immigration enforcement at schools and other essential-service sites, arguing that families should be able to access education, health care, shelters, libraries, and social services without fear. The Department of Education said it had already issued guidance in March 2025 for how staff should respond when law enforcement comes onto campus, and the Public Charter School Commission noted implementation would need to occur at the school level. Testifiers said the bill would create standardized protocols and protect students and families from fear and disruption; the chair reported 142 testimonies in support, one in opposition, and five comments. The committee then took up House Bill 2445, relating to student safety and law enforcement on campus. The Department of Education again said it had already rolled out statewide guidance and described its process for staff to notify administration, verify law enforcement identification and purpose, and route matters through the complex area superintendent and attorney general, while noting emergencies would be handled differently. A committee member questioned whether the procedures were sufficiently standardized and whether staff were trained for unusual situations. Student and community testifiers supported the bill, saying schools should remain safe havens and that clear procedures are needed if federal immigration enforcement appears on campus. The Department of Law Enforcement testified in opposition to parts of the measure, raising concerns about masking requirements, vehicle markings, officer safety, doxxing, retaliation, costs, and possible supremacy-clause conflicts, and suggested more exemptions and a compromise approach. The chair reported 106 testimonies in support, two comments, and no opposition for the bill before moving on to the next measure.