Video & Transcript : 'defendant registry' :

Page 4 of 363
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/26/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:32:49.279><c> First,</c> defending its value in court. First, defending its value in court.
  • It increases the cost of property tax litigation and it makes it harder for the government to defend
  • It increases the cost of property tax litigation and it makes it harder for the government to defend
  • Um, but the burden of proof is on the petitioner to prove that, and then we have to defend.
  • </c> defend. So we need this information. defend. So we need this information.
Bills: HF3676 , HF2959 , HF3233
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Little alone did they know that they were on the registry.
  • As I said, although the registry serves an important purpose.
  • It gets their name placed in the central registry without any due process whatsoever.
  • There's a difference, and the registry should reflect that. I don't know.
  • In fact, people also often call it the Child Abuse Registry.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're not necessarily until the defendant is. indicted and the defense attorney comes to us and says
  • addresses things like that the defense attorney has to redact those things if they turn it over to the defendant
  • Actually, we can't turn it over to the defendant.
  • Defense attorney gets it, but the defendant doesn't. OK. I just want to.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/2/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • action is being taken solely on the basis that the patient is a member of the Minnesota medical registry
  • cannot itself be member of the registry cannot itself be the<00:14:20.800><c> basis</c><00:14:21.120
  • patients the opportunity to registry patients the opportunity to have<00:14:45.600><c> injunctive</c
  • </c> the Minnesota medical registry program. the Minnesota medical registry program.
  • </c> being a enrolled member of the registry being a enrolled member of the registry program.<00:21:42.720
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Administration of Criminal Justice Apr 23rd, 2026

Administration of Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • We could not put that burden on the defendant.
  • We could not put that burden on the defendant.
  • believe a former public defender chief.
  • terminations of chief public defenders.
  • Number two, I started out as a public defender.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, I'm trying to hide. ...represent not as a defendant.
  • Section 4 deals with part-time public defenders and removes requirements for public defenders to report
  • results of defendants' financial circumstances.
  • Many indigent defendants will rely on court-appointed counsel to defend their lives in court.
  • A chief public defender of the Regional Public Defense Lawyers Association, the chief capital defender
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • An adequate defense does not rest solely on whether or not a defendant has access to counsel, though.
  • Without proper representation, indigent defendants are more likely to receive excessive sentences and
  • Now, keeping my maximum allowable caseload standards are already in place for public defender offices
  • The bill also fixes a basic fairness issue in that it gives defendants access to state files.
  • And a lot of times we say that we use our arms to defend our home.
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part I) Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additional training for jailers who interact with veterans requires interpreters for defendants in criminal
  • He's going to combat, defend himself, comes back home, Finds himself in trouble, finds himself in prison
  • I'm Morgan Shelburne and I have been a public defender for six years.
  • And I guess, you know, I guess I practiced law both as a prosecutor and I defended police officers for
  • And somebody asked me what happened with my a case defending a police officer.
Summary: The committee heard a series of criminal justice bills focused on victim protections, law enforcement tools, notary/deed fraud, sexually violent predators, veterans in jail, tribal policing authority, and peace officer records. Several bills were laid out, heard, and left pending because the committee lacked a quorum for final action on those items. Testimony was generally supportive on bills addressing interpreter appointments, fuel theft investigations, deed fraud, survivor privacy, veteran jailer training, tribal peace officer authority, and officer-record confidentiality, though some bills drew concerns about due process, scope, or drafting. Senate Bill 1537 would clean up criminal procedure language on appointing interpreters and align it with Government Code standards requiring licensed or certified interpreters; it received no public opposition and was left pending. Senate Bill 993 would let Comptroller Criminal Investigative Division officers directly seek warrants for mobile tracking devices in fuel-theft and tax-fraud investigations; it also drew support and was left pending. Senate Bill 693, as substituted, would create a criminal offense for notarizing documents without the signer personally appearing, with a higher penalty when real property is involved, and would add notary continuing education; a Dallas County prosecutor testified that notary fraud is a major driver of deed theft, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1610, as substituted, would address safety, registration, and criminal penalties at the Texas Civil Commitment Office for sexually violent predators, including assaults on staff and sex-offender registration issues; agency witnesses described increased assaults and operational problems, while a public witness urged waiting for Sunset review and raised due-process concerns. Senate Bill 836 would add privacy protections for sexual assault survivors by limiting livestreaming of trials, expanding pseudonym use, and protecting forensic exam and invasive-recording evidence; survivors and advocates strongly supported it, and defense lawyers said they had no opposition to the substitute. Senate Bill 1563 would require county jailer training on interacting with veterans, with testimony from the Texas Veterans Commission and veterans’ advocates emphasizing suicide risk, PTSD, and the need for better identification and support in jails; the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 906, which would authorize the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribal police to be commissioned as Texas peace officers like two other federally recognized tribes in Texas; tribal leaders said the change would improve response times and coordination, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 781, as substituted, would standardize confidentiality rules for peace officer personnel and departmental files statewide, mirroring Chapter 143 civil-service practices; law enforcement witnesses supported it as a way to protect personal information and create uniform records practices, but several senators raised concerns that the bill could blur existing disclosure rules or bury misconduct complaints, and public testimony included an opposition witness describing a police shooting involving her brother.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 15th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 503 by Perry relating to an establishment of an electronic registry of livestock marks and brands.
  • SB 503 by Perry relating to an establishment of an electronic registry of livestock marks and brands.
  • “It improves the way the government operates by defending our citizens.”
Summary: The House convened with prayer, pledges, and several ceremonial recognitions, including Wilson County Day, San Antonio Mission Indian Descendants Day, and Blue Ribbon Lobby Day, along with acknowledgments of visiting groups and a birthday greeting. The chamber also announced committee meetings and then moved into floor business, including conference committee action on Senate Bill 1, the state budget. A series of motions to instruct House conferees on SB 1 were debated and voted on. One motion sought to restore salary for Attorney General Ken Paxton after his impeachment-related suspension; it passed 88-56. Another, from Rep. Olcott, directed conferees to support amendments requiring data collection on the costs of undocumented immigrants in hospitals and prisons; after extended debate and a failed amendment from Rep. Martinez Fischer to also study immigrants’ economic contributions, the motion passed 86-61. The House also adopted instructions to eliminate Texas Lottery Commission funding, to support amendments restricting public education institutions from affirming gender identities inconsistent with biological sex, and to seek an additional $4 billion in property tax relief, with each motion passing on recorded votes. The House then took up a supplemental calendar and passed several bills, including HB 39 on veteran death data, HB 102 on priority registration for certain students entering military service, HB 126 on student-athlete compensation and representation, HB 290 on tuition and fee assistance for members of the Texas military forces, HB 300 on Texas Armed Services Scholarship Program updates, and HB 2143 naming a highway in honor of Army Specialist Joey Lins. The chamber also postponed consideration of HJR 2 and HJR 6. Later, the House considered HB 120 on career and technology education pathways and HB 20 on applied science pathway programs for high school students. HB 120 received a perfecting amendment and was advanced after discussion about workforce preparation. HB 20 prompted extensive questioning about transportation, costs, and how students would access partner campuses such as community colleges and TSTC sites; debate continued as the transcript ended, with members examining how the program would operate and whether approval authority would rest with TEA.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Administration of Criminal Justice May 12th, 2026

Administration of Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • The questions can only go to the victim and the victim family, not the defendant?
  • And they try to speak with the defendant. and abusers. And they try to speak with the defendant.
  • It's the victim, the victim's family, the defendant, but there's nobody forcing the probation and parole
  • , indigent or pauper pro se defendants to file for free, or without this fee being assessed.
  • Additional fees, well, defendants are not paying this fee directly in most cases.
Bills: HB75 , SB134 , SB201 , SB258 , SB288 , SB313 , SB320 , SB321 , SB325 , SB339 , SB345 , SB393 , SB422 , SB440 , SB470 , SB487 , SB523
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Defendant, are we talking about in these provisions?
  • The defendant, the driver, wouldn't bring the company in?
  • If we add one more defendant, let's just add one more defendant, OK?
  • And so when the plaintiff sues the defendant and the defendant, the company says, wait a minute, they
  • So you have those defendants there, right? What happens?