Video & Transcript Research : 'benefits navigation'

Page 4 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/16/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Could you please tell me, would we receive the benefits of economies of scale if we refer to the BCA,
  • Could you please tell me, would we receive the benefits of economies of scale if we refer to the BCA,
Bills: HF4074
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/26

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • are comparable types of benefits are comparable.
  • With the benefits, we do have benefits.
  • . benefits. benefits.
  • </c><01:32:16.719><c> are</c> and so the whether or not benefits are and so the whether or not benefits
  • :18.719><c> are</c> comparable types of benefits are comparable types of benefits are comparable<01:32
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 23rd, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • When I weigh out the risks and benefits, the agreed-upon bill is a good bill.
  • This bill is not about reducing benefits at all; it's a study.
  • We call for an examination of the adequacy of the retirement benefits.
  • It does improve benefits for Houston firefighters.
  • And as long as we're fully covering the actuarial cost of the benefit, it's a fantastic bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 23rd, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Since 2001, no benefit adjustment.
  • I hope to be the only executive director who has not given a benefit to our retirees.
  • So charter schools actually see no additional benefit from this extra contribution.
  • I'll be working to try to get them a benefit enhancement.
  • So they're getting about a 20% discount on the same benefit.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • federal VA benefits.
  • If you are ineligible for VA benefits, you'd be ineligible for MDVA benefits, but it's not a voluntary
  • </c> they forfeit their federal VA benefits. they forfeit their federal VA benefits.
  • You would also be forfeiting benefits. You would also be forfeiting state<01:36:50.320><c> benefits.
  • for benefits, you'd be unel ineligible for MDVA<01:36:57.520><c> benefits,</c><01:36:58.560><c> but<
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services May 6th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • trafficking and occurs when someone either lies on their application, sells their benefits to others
  • , or a retailer or a third party skims benefits from the card.
  • In that case, the race, the rate of fraud of benefits trafficking is less than 1% of SNAP expenditures
  • Yeah, or would this cause you to lose your benefits?
  • We need to get those benefits to people ASAP.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services May 6th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • One example of that is our family navigators. Our family navigators are philanthropically funded.
  • And that we've created to walk alongside the parents as they navigate the system.
  • From an innovation standpoint, community-based care brings several benefits to the table.
  • The challenge is that calculating what that should be can be difficult and to the state's benefit.
  • Our volunteers stand beside children navigating the foster care system, who have already endured trauma
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services May 6th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ensures that benefits go to the intended recipients and protects our most vulnerable populations
  • If they are a retailer, a third-party skims benefits from the card.
  • In that case, the rate of fraud and benefits trafficking is less than 1% of SNAP expenditures.
  • Would this cause you to lose your benefits?
  • We need to get those benefits to them ASAP.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill in no way cuts program eligibility. benefits, Senate Bill 1183 simply ensures that these benefits
  • Chairman, in fiscal year 24, the USDA reports 10,000 stolen benefits claims from SNAP in Texas.
  • Texas ranks fourth in the country for the number of stolen benefits claims.
  • We have a SNAP and benefits and TANF proceeds that are placed on this card.
  • benefits. benefits to others are a retailer, third-party, skims benefits from the card.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, to answer the first question, it is possible to place a photo on the card, the benefit card.
  • They'll receive a form and complete a form so that there is a secondary user listed for those benefits
  • We have a SNAP and benefits and TANF proceeds that are placed on this card.
  • trafficking and occurs when someone lies on their application, sells their benefits, and sells their
  • benefits. benefits to others are a retailer, third-party, skims benefits from the card.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 3rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill in no way cuts program eligibility or benefits.
  • SNAP fraud is benefits trafficking and occurs when someone lies on their application, sells their benefits
  • to others, or a retailer third party skims benefits from the card.
  • Snap fraud is benefits trafficking and occurs when someone lies on their application, sells their benefits
  • And for the benefit of those participating in the hearing, And for the benefit of those participating
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1183, by Senator Creighton, which would require Lone Star Cards used for SNAP and TANF benefits to display the recipient’s name and photo, add fraud-reporting information, and require HHSC to track replacement-card requests. Creighton argued the bill would reduce fraud and protect taxpayer dollars, citing Texas SNAP theft and overpayment data. HHSC testified that photo IDs on the card are technically possible and explained how authorized secondary users are added. Dr. Amber O’Connor of Every Texan testified against the bill, saying SNAP fraud is a small share of expenditures, that the proposal would be costly and ineffective, and that federal rules limit mandatory photo requirements. Public testimony closed and SB 1183 was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1184, also by Senator Creighton, which would lower from 20 years to 10 years the minimum age of collectible wine that Texas collectors may sell to permitted restaurants. Supporters said the change would help Texas restaurants access desirable vintages, keep collectible wine in-state, and align with market demand; invited witnesses from the wine industry testified in favor. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1184 was left pending. Next, Senator Birdwell laid out Senate Bill 2051 and Senate Joint Resolution 68, both aimed at revising Texas impeachment procedures in response to issues identified during the 2023 impeachment process. The measures would clarify constitutional and statutory impeachment authority, require sworn testimony, extend review periods for House members, address conflicts of interest and presiding officers, require cost reporting, and modify rules for impeaching the governor or lieutenant governor. A committee substitute added protections for the accused, longer review periods, and a fallback presiding-officer option. Witnesses generally supported stronger accountability but raised questions about whether the language should also cover retired or visiting judges. Both measures were left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1577, which would expand Texas Motor Speedway’s alcohol sales authority to include distilled spirits and remove certain event and concession limits; the Speedway’s representative supported the bill and it was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 42 and Senate Bill 240, which would recognize only two sexes and restrict access to sex-designated private spaces in public facilities based on biological sex. Supporters argued the measures were needed to protect women’s privacy and safety, including in schools and shelters, while opponents warned about enforcement problems, privacy concerns, and impacts on transgender Texans and others who do not fit stereotypical sex traits. After extensive testimony, both measures were left pending. The committee then took up multiple pending bills and reported several favorably, including SB 511, SB 33, SB 510, SB 871, SB 2024, SB 2166, SJR 27, SJR 40, SB 1313, SB 1314, SB 1316, SB 1541, SB 2420, SB 1999, SB 2309, SB 1860, and SB 2429, with some also certified for the local and uncontested calendar.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-03

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • This includes looking at its relevance and proportionality to what's needed, and if so, that the benefit
  • There's no role for the court in determining relevance, proportionality, or whether the benefit outweighs
  • I'm here on behalf of MACDL, but I know that all private attorneys who are in court would benefit from
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/3/25 - Part 2

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The statute establishes a forensic navigator program, and forensic navigators are appointed by the court
  • Forensic navigators are stand trial.
  • :51:16.800><c> work</c> Defendants that forensic navigators work Defendants that forensic navigators
  • </c> legislature on forensic navigator legislature on forensic navigator specific<00:53:15.280><c> data
  • And then like I mentioned, navigator.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/3/25 - Part 1

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • If so, the benefit to the party seeking access to the data outweighs the harm to the confidentiality
  • There's no role for the court in determining relevance, proportionality, or the benefit that it does
  • I'm here on behalf of MACDL, but I know that all private attorneys who are in court would benefit from
  • c><01:26:38.719><c> in</c><01:26:39.000><c> court</c><01:26:39.480><c> would</c><01:26:39.719><c> benefit
  • </c> attorneys who are in court would benefit attorneys who are in court would benefit from<01:26:40.440
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • hazardous duty benefits.
  • </c> and also the health benefits provided. and also the health benefits provided.
  • Those benefits as well.
  • </c> need of those hazardous duty benefits. need of those hazardous duty benefits.
  • their um benefit payout as well?
Summary: The committee heard testimony from Rep. Ashley Tackett Laferty on a bill to extend minimum line-of-duty hazardous duty retirement benefits to certain CERS and KERS non-hazardous members who are injured in the line of duty and cannot return to that work. She used a video and examples from Eastern Kentucky first responders, including a deputy who lost a leg and an emergency management director who lost an eye, to argue that some injured officers and responders fall through the cracks because their employers did not elect hazardous-duty coverage. She said the proposal would provide 25% of pay to the disabled officer, plus 10% for dependent children and minimal health benefits, and noted estimated actuarial costs of about $2.9 million for CERS and $0.542 million for KERS, funded through small employer-rate increases. Members asked how far back the bill would reach, how many people might qualify, and whether the benefit would apply only to active employees or also to past injuries. Laferty said the bill would include a five-year window for recent situations and could potentially cover a total of 3,333 positions statewide that could be certified as hazardous, though benefits would only apply if the person was injured in the line of duty and disabled from returning to that work. Questions also focused on whether a non-hazardous employee could qualify if injured in a hazardous situation; Laferty said yes, if the position could be certified as hazardous, but only for the bill’s minimum benefits. Rep. Josh Calloway and others noted that local governments choose whether to pay the higher hazardous-duty contribution rates, which they said often drives the coverage decision. The committee then heard Rep. Daniel Gberg present a separate bill revising school leave rules so teachers and school employees may use accumulated sick leave to observe religious holidays not on the school calendar, with a required personal statement and advance notice. He said the change would address a longstanding inconsistency for teachers who observe non-Christian holidays and currently may have to choose between unpaid leave or improperly using sick days, and he said prior concerns about retirement service credit and maternity leave were reduced by other policy changes. The discussion ended without a vote, with members indicating they had the relevant materials and that the bill would be revisited later.