Video & Transcript Research : 'bail monitoring'

Page 4 of 312
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • any parent who wants to bring their child there, so they're aware of the situation with camera monitoring
  • they choose to do Wi-Fi or cloud storage, I remember there were stories when the, um, the video baby monitor
  • > were stories when the, um, the video were stories when the, um, the video baby<01:46:55.840> monitor
  • started<01:46:56.520> coming<01:46:56.840> up,<01:46:57.760> people baby monitor
  • started coming up, people baby monitor started coming up, people were<01:46:58.160> hacking<01
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 24th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Tulsa County, a federal judge ruled that a system where Detainees can be released if they can pay for bail
  • while others who cannot afford bail are held in jail as a violation of the equal protection of the laws
  • Tulsa County now has bail hearings within 48 hours. This all came about again because of a lawsuit.
  • They don't have the ability to pay for bail, so they have to go Back to their job, and they don't show
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 17, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • seven, delete test and replace<01:33:09.040> it<01:33:09.280> with<01:33:09.600> monitoring
  • <01:33:10.880> In<01:33:11.120> our replace it with monitoring.
  • In our replace it with monitoring.
  • require a water envisioning uh would require a water right<01:33:19.199> for<01:33:19.679> monitoring
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Commerce and Economic Development Oversight Apr 14th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Commerce & Economic Development Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 378 modernizes the Oklahoma multi-county bond bail has been statute by controlling flexibility
  • Senate Bill 378 modernizes the Oklahoma multi-county bond bail bonds statute by controlling flexibility
  • have as regulated by the Insurance Department, because the Insurance Department regulates all of the bail
  • They don't have to work through a bail bondsman because they're being financed by the cartels and they
  • Through a bail bondsman because they're being financed by the cartels and they got plenty of cash.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • on posting information on who posts bail on posting information on who posts bail yes<01:01:03.799
  • them, including one that involved bailing out a person that was under arrest for murder.
  • It is not uncommon for victims of domestic violence to pay the bail for their own abuser.
  • It is not uncommon for victims of domestic violence to pay the bail for their own abuser.
  • It is not uncommon for victims of domestic violence to pay the bail for their own abuser.
Bills: HF7
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • warrant for the return of an individual who violates the condition of their parole and is being monitored
  • PS ankle monitor, removed his device, and went on to a murder spree, murdering three different individuals
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Does it mean that they don't wear the ankle monitor, or does it What happens if they—does it mean that
  • they don't wear the ankle monitor, or does it mean that there's some other entity that pays for the
  • ankle monitor?
  • Money needs to be spent to monitor them, to punish them.
  • And if we don't put them in jail, the least we could do is make sure we're monitoring them.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/16/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • , monitoring, electrolyte monitoring, renal and liver monitoring, and naturopathic training, although
  • Yeah, and we monitor kidney disease. We monitor heart disease.
  • We monitor safety.
  • We monitor safety.
  • You monitor them and all.
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1114, which would appropriate $1 million to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office to investigate behavioral health patient brokering statewide. Sponsor Sen. Karen Werner described the bill as a response to fraud involving vulnerable Native Americans and said the county attorney would investigate the whole state. Some members questioned why the Attorney General was not handling the work and whether the funding should go to a county office, while others supported the effort. The committee voted 10-1 with one present to give SB 1114 a due pass recommendation. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1116, which would require that denials or adverse appeal decisions on behavioral health claims for the American Indian Health Program be reviewed by someone with at least two years of relevant clinical experience. Access testified neutral but said the bill’s language was too broad and could increase appeals and staffing needs, estimating about $490,000 for eight FTEs. Sen. Werner said the bill was meant to prevent inappropriate denials by reviewers without relevant expertise. Members raised concerns about definitions and staffing, and the committee approved the bill 7-4 with one present. Senate Bill 1346 would require Access to notify providers of claim deficiencies within 72 hours and decide corrected claims within 10 business days. Supporters said the measure would reduce long delays and help providers stay afloat; Access said it was working on process improvements but warned the bill would require more staff and system changes, estimating about $580,000. The committee passed SB 1346 7-5. Senate Bill 1347, requiring insurance coverage for fertility preservation services for cancer patients at risk of infertility, drew strong support from cancer survivors and advocates, with insurers neutral; the committee passed it unanimously 12-0. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1813, which would require Arizona State Hospital admissions to be based on clinical need rather than county of residence. Supporters argued the Maricopa County cap unfairly delays treatment and is not required by the underlying court ruling, while ADHS warned the bill could conflict with the Arnold v. Sarn settlement and could shift access away from rural counties. After extensive discussion, the committee passed SB 1813 9-2 with one present. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 1178, which would allow naturopathic physicians to administer IV antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals; the initial testimony was largely opposed by medical associations on patient-safety and training grounds, with supporters yet to testify in the excerpt provided.