Video & Transcript : 'emission standards' :
Page 492 of 500
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <c> and</c><01:12:34.960><c> that</c><01:12:35.120><c> if</c><01:12:35.280><c> they</c> accepted standards
- and that if they accepted standards and that if they were,<01:12:35.840><c> we</c><01:12:36.000><c>
- Allowing more than one model of risk pool to operate is consistent with national standards.
- :33.600><c> national</c> operate is consistent with national operate is consistent with national standards
- It's consistent with AGIP, standards.
Committee:
Senate Finance
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Funding (09/30/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- just perpetuates a process in which we're constantly scrambling to meet some externally defined standard
- just perpetuates a process in which we're constantly scrambling to meet some externally defined standard
- just perpetuates a process in which we're constantly scrambling to meet some externally defined standard
- defined standard conjured up by<00:48:29.760><c> the</c><00:48:30.000><c> court</c><00:48:30.720><c>
- These high schools academic standards.
Summary:
The Education Funding Committee Subcommittee on Adequacy and Funding Sources opened its second meeting by reviewing four retained bills assigned to it: HB 651, HB 772, HB 491, and HB 734. The chair said the goal was to compare the bills across the board, consider whether any one of them should be the committee’s recommended vehicle, and then vote on a recommendation to the full committee. He noted the bills would move out before November 21 and be taken up on the House floor in January, while related LSRs were also being developed for the coming session.
Representative Ames argued that HB 651 should be the main vehicle because it would substantially raise the adequacy base and adjust differential aid categories to better reflect real school costs, including poverty, special education, and English learner needs. He described the bill as building on court guidance and said the current funding formula is far below actual district needs. He also supported HB 491 as a study vehicle to examine revenue options, saying the legislature needs informed choices about how to pay for the changes. Representative Damon strongly backed HB 651 and HB 491, citing constitutional obligations, the Conval and Rand rulings, and large projected funding increases for districts such as Claremont, Windham, and communities in the chair’s district if HB 651 had passed earlier.
Representative Fellows said he has an LSR similar to HB 491 that would study existing and new revenue options using criteria such as revenue potential, administrative cost, affected groups, implementation timeline, and implementation cost, with input from revenue administration and outside agencies. Representative Papich Muller emphasized constitutional separation-of-powers concerns, reading Article 83 and saying he was not comfortable with the broad claim that “cherish” clearly mandates a specific spending level, though he said he intends to follow Supreme Court guidance. Representative Ricky read testimony from a local school board member arguing that the state already imposes many mandates on schools while providing the least funding in the country, and that HB 651 would help restore meaningful local control. No final vote or action was taken in the portion provided, though the chair had indicated the subcommittee would vote before adjournment.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Human Services May 21st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- So this May Revision includes $2 million total funds to bring the CalFresh standard utility allowance
- Overall, the new standard utility allowance is expected to increase benefits. Thank you. 21.
- Overall, the new standard utility allowance is expected to increase benefits. Thank you. 21. 21.
- Standards that we want them to be provided, and then also limiting that time that the child can be in
- to the standards.
Summary:
The hearing began with opening remarks on the Governor’s May Revision for child care and human services, with committee members and advocates stressing that the budget should not be balanced on the backs of low-income families, children, and providers. Legislative members and public witnesses strongly opposed the proposed suspension of the child care COLA, reductions to the Emergency Child Care Bridge Program, and the lack of codified rate reform tied to the alternative methodology. Several speakers also urged more support for providers affected by the Eaton fire and other disasters, and called for child care to be funded at the true cost of care and for additional slots to be restored.
Administration, LAO, and Department of Education staff described the child care proposal as maintaining existing funding levels while adding administrative resources to prepare for federally required prospective payment changes and single-rate reform. The administration said the May Revision would suspend the 2025–26 COLA and reduce Bridge Program funding to align with utilization, while the LAO raised questions about the size and purpose of the proposed rate-reform and prospective-payment funding and recommended rejecting a Department of Technology exemption. CDE supported continued early education investments but said it would need additional resources if prospective pay were extended to state preschool, and it objected to a proposed reallocation of preschool funds for inclusive education grants.
The committee then moved to the IHSS portion of the May Revision. DSS outlined five major proposals: capping provider work hours at 50 per week, eliminating IHSS for undocumented adults age 19 and older, shifting certain Community First Choice reassessment penalties to counties, reinstating the Medi-Cal asset test as a conforming IHSS reduction, and automating the termination of IHSS when Medi-Cal eligibility ends. DSS also discussed funding to implement a federal HCBS access rule and a separate reassessment of IHSS administrative methodology that found counties would need additional administrative funding. Finance said the proposals were intended to slow program growth and improve sustainability, while the LAO said it was still analyzing the package and raised concerns about implementation, county workload, and the potential loss of services.
Committee members and public commenters criticized the IHSS cuts, especially the overtime cap and the elimination of services for undocumented adults and people affected by the asset test. Advocates argued that IHSS workers and recipients depend on these services, that county administration is already underfunded, and that the proposals could destabilize vulnerable consumers. The chair closed by saying the committee would continue to fight for child care and would not pause on child care, and the meeting recessed before moving on to the remaining May Revision items.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Education Finance May 20th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- opportunities program, inclusive college technical assistance center cleanup, curriculum frameworks, standards
- The COLA goes to a small subset of providers, those who are funded on the standard reimbursement rate
- The COLA goes to a small subset of providers, those who are funded on the standard reimbursement rate
- Is that just a standard process that—sorry, probably your question. I’m sorry.
- Is that standard? Yeah, the short answer is no.
Summary:
The committee heard the May Revision presentation for the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance, with public comment focused heavily on K-12 priorities such as universal school meals, kitchen infrastructure, food service and custodial support, youth leadership grants, Special Olympics funding, English learner support, universal pre-K, literacy investments, and concerns about community college funding shifts. Speakers also urged support for expanded learning, teacher recruitment and training, and maintaining or increasing funding for community colleges and student support programs.
Finance and the LAO then reviewed the Proposition 98 outlook. Finance said the May Revision lowers the 2025-26 Prop. 98 guarantee to $114.6 billion, about $4.3 billion below January, due mainly to lower revenue estimates, with smaller effects from attendance and property tax changes. The administration also described rebenching for universal transitional kindergarten and a one-time rebench tied to Los Angeles fire-related property tax losses, along with changes to the Public School System Stabilization Account, deferrals, and updated COLA assumptions. The LAO said the budget relies too much on deferrals and one-time funds, creates a structural shortfall, and should instead align ongoing spending with the guarantee and preserve a reserve buffer.
Members questioned the TK rebench and the shift of funding from community colleges to K-12, asking why it was being applied retroactively and how colleges would be held harmless. Finance said the changes align funding with where TK costs are being incurred and that reappropriation funding and other adjustments would offset impacts on community colleges. The LAO argued the historical split formula is outdated and should be abandoned in favor of budgeting around current priorities rather than fixed percentages. Members also raised concerns about draining the rainy day reserve and using deferrals, while the LAO said preserving reserves would better protect against future volatility.
The committee then moved to specific K-12 and education proposals. Finance outlined May Revision changes including state operations adjustments for the Department of Education, technical trailer bill changes, a $100 million student teacher stipend program administered by Kern County, and updates to the charter school facility grant program. The LAO recommended rejecting the proposed increases for expanded learning, literacy coaches, and the student teacher stipend as currently structured, while supporting the minimum grant increase for expanded learning. Members expressed support for teacher recruitment efforts but questioned whether one-time funding can sustain ongoing programs and whether the student teacher stipend should be targeted to shortage areas or low-income communities.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (04/23/2025)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:17:39.840><c> and</c> need to go to police standards and need to go to police standards and training
- Um they have standards<00:46:53.440><c> that</c><00:46:53.680><c> they</c><00:46:53.839><c> use</c><00
- :46:54.480><c> for</c><00:46:54.960><c> taking</c><00:46:55.200><c> a</c> standards that they use for
- taking a standards that they use for taking a case<00:46:55.680><c> federally.
- </c> talking about would meet the standards talking about would meet the standards that<00:47:36.480>
Committee:
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Security necessitates a more robust, standardized approach to verifying election security. electronic
- I hope it will encourage them when they get their citizenship to go to DPS and get a. standard license
- This is already standard practice for individuals presenting limited term licenses.
- can't answer. that specifically, but I do not believe that the local type of elections meet that standard
- Compared to the statewide, the county, the federal elections do have to meet that UOCAVA standard.
Bills:
SB16 , SB76 , SB310 , SB311 , SB396 , SB505 , SB827 , SB964 , SB1209 , SB1210 , SB1386 , SB1470 , SB2035 , SJR37 , SB 16
Committee:
Senate State Affairs
Keywords:
voter registration, proof of citizenship, Election Code, criminal offenses, limited federal ballot, transportation, infrastructure, funding, public safety, state regulation, election, polling places, voter access, state oversight, electronic voting, voting, polling place, elections, countywide program, election integrity
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/25
Agriculture Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- going through their criteria, evaluating how they're implementing the water quality certification standards
- </c><00:20:43.679><c> that</c><00:20:43.799><c> we'd</c><00:20:44.039><c> walk</c> have about 19 standards
- that we'd walk have about 19 standards that we'd walk through<00:20:44.679><c> each</c><00:20:44.960
- 22.400><c> be</c><00:39:22.520><c> noted</c><00:39:22.839><c> that</c><00:39:22.960><c> when</c> standards
- it should be noted that when standards it should be noted that when this<00:39:23.280><c> bill</c><00
Committee:
House Agriculture Finance and Policy
Keywords:
HF363, property tax credit, agricultural water quality credit, Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program, clean water fund, class 2a, class 2b, certified acres, conservation incentive, water quality, agricultural property, county assessor, county auditor, Department of Revenue, Department of Agriculture, property tax reimbursement, school district reimbursement, legacy finance, taxes committee, southeastern Minnesota
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- They share our commitment to the highest of worksite safety standards and work hard to create an attractive
- Grant Hauschild also just mentioned, we are committed to complying with the 100% by 2040 carbon-free standard
- Grant Hauschild also just mentioned, we are committed to complying with the 100% by 2040 carbon-free standard
- materials consumed by these hyperscale data centers, then we should be establishing clear Minnesota standards
- decrease electrical reliability, or have some sort of a negative consequence for our carbon-free standard
Committee:
Senate Taxes
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- In addition, the bill requires the Attorney General to prove or deny within 25 days, although the standard
- I'm starting with this example to demonstrate how far the standards of integrity have fallen at the Texas
- Can you give me what you think is the best best practice standard for an organization?
- talk to New York and New Jersey, who are two states that have implemented very vigorous and high standard
- Oh well I was I was talking about this strict scrutiny standard. here and so this has been I know some
Bills:
SB 28 , SB 687 , SJR 34 , SCR 9 , SB 523 , SB 62 , SB 847 , SB 706 , SB 869 , SB 890 , SB 992
Committee:
Senate State Affairs
Keywords:
lottery, gambling, internet gaming, mobile application, criminal offenses, SB 687, land surveyor, land surveying, surveying services, construction contract, anti-indemnity, indemnity, hold harmless, defense obligation, standard of care, professional negligence, civil practice and remedies code, local government code, governmental agency, public contracts
Summary:
The meeting was a crucial session for discussing several important bills including SB992, which aims to establish a clear time frame for the Attorney General's approval on outside legal counsel for state agencies. Senator Nichols presented the bill, emphasizing its necessity for timely responses to ensure efficient legal processing. Another notable discussion centered around SB523, which seeks to allow parole and probation officers to use a business address on their driver's licenses for safety and security purposes. This bill passed favorably out of the committee, with public testimony supporting the need for such provisions due to the risks these officers face.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- in our elections embedded in the Constitution and a judicial review process for making sure that standard
- in our elections embedded in the Constitution and a judicial review process for making sure that standard
- required uh in law to show the standards required uh in law to show that<01:07:31.720><c> they've</c
- c> is</c><01:08:12.440><c> enforced</c><01:08:13.440><c> so</c><01:08:13.839><c> I</c> sure that standard
- is enforced so I sure that standard is enforced so I would<01:08:14.279><c> ask</c><01:08:15.000><c>
Committee:
Senate Elections
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (03/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- compliant with ADA standards, as far as you understand?
- compliant with ADA standards, as far as you understand?
- compliant with ADA standards, as far as you understand?
- compliant with ADA standards, as far as you understand?
- The form that's outlined here, as far as you understand, is compliant with ADA standards?
Summary:
The committee held a work session on a bill arising from the Lee case involving animal seizures and humane society involvement. Members and the commissioner discussed concerns about due process, lack of clear notice to animal owners, the need for owners to understand when they are surrendering ownership, and whether humane agents should have additional training or certification. Several members also questioned the role of the NH SPCA and humane societies, the absence of oversight, and whether there was any financial or policy conflict in their involvement. The commissioner said the Department of Agriculture does not have a direct relationship with humane societies, but does coordinate with police on seizures, and noted that problems tend to arise when agencies do not consult the department first.
Testimony and discussion focused on possible fixes to the bill, including clearer written notice of rights, requiring a third-party qualified veterinarian or other neutral evaluator, establishing the condition of animals at the time of seizure for later court proceedings, and possibly using teleconferencing with a veterinarian in limited circumstances. Some members suggested the bill may need a broader study committee, while others said it should be amended now rather than delayed. The chair said the bill would be worked on further and sent to the subcommittee for more detailed review.
The committee then opened a hearing on HB 250, which would allow local governing bodies to regulate dog muzzling. Representative Jodi Newell testified that the bill was intended to let municipalities respond to dangerous dogs, citing Keene’s attempt to require muzzling after a serious incident but lack of clear authority under current law. Deborah LeBlanc also testified about a dog attack that seriously injured her dog and said a muzzle requirement could have prevented the attack. Committee members asked about the incident, existing dog-control laws, and whether the dog had been leashed; the discussion suggested the bill was meant to clarify local authority over muzzling as a public safety measure.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Public Health Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am
Joint Committee on Public Health
Transcript Highlights:
- you to support S. 1557 and H. 2554, which will ensure that all children who can safely receive the standard
- This clearly conflicts with the standard recently articulated by our Supreme Judicial Court in Care and
- Even within a school, we have a population of adults not held to the same standard as children and are
- The standard for safety testing with pharmaceuticals is years of safety review, but with vaccines, there's
- And there are no gold-standard safety studies with an inert placebo on vaccines.
Committee:
Joint Joint Committee on Public Health
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Public Health held a hearing on several vaccination-related bills, including proposals to eliminate non-medical or religious exemptions for school immunizations (notably H. 2554 and S. 1557), a bill to require or improve reporting and administration of immunization data and exemptions (described as the Community Immunity Act, S. 1618), and H. 2431, which would prohibit COVID-19, mRNA, or gene-altering vaccine requirements. The committee also heard testimony on H. 2463, which would classify funeral directors as public health workers for vaccine-priority purposes during emergencies. The chair reviewed testimony rules and repeatedly asked speakers to keep comments orderly and brief so the committee could hear as many people as possible. No votes were taken during the hearing.
Testimony on H. 2554 and S. 1557 was sharply divided. Pediatricians, infectious disease specialists, public health advocates, and groups such as the Massachusetts Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Massachusetts Medical Society, March of Dimes, Massachusetts Families for Vaccines, and several parents supported eliminating religious exemptions, arguing that vaccination protects medically vulnerable children and adults, improves herd immunity, and helps prevent outbreaks of measles, pertussis, and other diseases. They cited local school data showing pockets of lower coverage and incomplete reporting, and several speakers referenced outbreaks in other states and the need for stronger, more consistent reporting and exemption management. Opponents argued the bills would infringe on religious freedom and parental rights, force families to choose between faith and education, and unfairly target a small number of families; some also said Massachusetts already has high vaccination rates and that the real issue is incomplete data or the gap population rather than religious exemptions.
H. 2431 drew testimony from supporters who said COVID-era mandates caused job losses, privacy concerns, and harm, and that the bill would prevent future requirements for COVID, mRNA, or gene-altering vaccines in schools, workplaces, and public settings. Supporters described personal experiences with alleged vaccine injury or mandate-related hardship. H. 2463 was supported by the Massachusetts Funeral Directors Association, which argued funeral directors work in infection-facing settings and should be eligible for vaccine priority during public health emergencies. The hearing featured extensive public testimony but no committee action beyond hearing the bills and taking questions from members.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Select Committee on Tribal Relations, June 15, 2026 - PM
Select Committee on Tribal Relations
Transcript Highlights:
- Black, tribal liaison and social studies standards consultant.
- Black, tribal liaison and social studies standards consultant.
- Black, tribal liaison and social studies standards consultant.
- Black, tribal liaison and social studies standards consultant.
- </c> standard of 0008. standard of 0008.
Committee:
Joint Select Committee on Tribal Relations
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26
Children and Families Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Cameras in areas where clients' assets are held are standard practice, not as an accusation, but as a
- Don't our children deserve at least that standard of care?
- Safety improves through systems and standards, not constant surveillance.
- </c><01:02:37.599><c> to</c> care facilities at a higher standard to care facilities at a higher standard
- for something particular like standard for something particular like this<01:30:09.760><c> when</c><
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 2/23/26
Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Generally speaking, unlicensed programs have fewer barriers to entry and fewer standards for businesses
- Licensure is important and will create clear and enforceable standards for EIDBI providers related to
- Comprehensive<00:14:19.040><c> licensure</c><00:14:19.520><c> standards</c><00:14:20.000><c> are</c>
- Comprehensive licensure standards are Comprehensive licensure standards are being<00:14:20.280><c> developed
- </c><00:14:27.320><c> for</c> clear and enforceable standards for clear and enforceable standards for
Bills:
HF3542
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate - 02/23/26
Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, our story and really the existence of regulation over mandatory electric reliability standards in
- </c><01:04:08.079><c> We</c><01:04:08.640><c> refer</c><01:04:08.880><c> to</c> mandatory standards.
- We refer to mandatory standards.
- We monitor and enforce compliance with mandatory electric reliability standards.
- Um, as I electric reliability standards.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- You know, the eligibility standard is that you are experiencing abuse.
- It should be the standard for the entire state.
- in the way we do things in law enforcement in certain areas where we lack standardization.
- This would bring the remainder of those officers into the same confidentiality standards.
- If you look at cities that do not have civil service, they are mimicking those standards.
Committee:
Senate State Affairs
Keywords:
gender designation, civil penalties, private civil rights, multiple-occupancy spaces, Texas Women's Privacy Act, law enforcement, confidentiality, personnel files, employee records, misconduct
Summary:
The Committee on State Affairs heard testimony on Senate Bill 7, the Texas Women’s Privacy Act, with the author and committee substitute explaining that the bill would require public facilities to designate multi-use private spaces by biological sex, restrict access to women’s restrooms, locker rooms, showers, sleeping quarters, shelters, and correctional facilities, and create civil penalties and enforcement mechanisms. Members asked about how the bill would apply to family violence shelters, children in mixed-family settings, venue layout, and venue for lawsuits; the author said the bill was similar to prior legislation but with stronger penalties and the 15th Court of Appeals as the exclusive intermediate appellate court for challenges, while clarifying that trial venue should generally be local except for state agencies. The committee also heard that the bill would be amended to better address local venue concerns and shelter-related issues.
Invited testimony was largely in support of the bill from witnesses who described personal experiences in women’s sports, prisons, shelters, and public facilities, arguing that single-sex spaces are necessary for privacy and safety. Supporters included parents, former incarcerated women, a Republican county chair, a legal advocate, and a prison educator, who cited incidents involving transgender-identifying individuals in locker rooms, shelters, prisons, and restrooms, and said the bill would restore sex-based boundaries and protect vulnerable women and girls. One witness from Texas Values said the bill was needed despite the recently enacted Women’s Bill of Rights, and another ADF witness said the measure would protect privacy in schools and shelters.
Opponents testified that the bill would harm transgender and intersex Texans, create harassment and “gender policing,” and expose cisgender women and children to invasive enforcement. Several witnesses argued there is no evidence that transgender women pose a restroom safety threat, while others said the bill would worsen mental health, employment, and school conditions for trans people and could conflict with prison standards and federal law. Family violence advocates urged changes to protect shelter operations and clarify that children can stay with parents, while other witnesses said the bill would create barriers for victims seeking help. The hearing featured extensive public testimony on both sides, but no final vote or committee action was taken in the portion provided.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, July 16, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Not to standardize curriculum, but to standardize the worth of children.
- Not to standardize curriculum, chance.
- Not to standardize curriculum, but<01:05:00.640><c> to</c><01:05:00.960><c> standardize</c><01:05:01.920
- ><c> the</c><01:05:02.240><c> worth</c><01:05:02.480><c> of</c> but to standardize the worth of but to
- National standards for protecting LGBTQ students, because they are students, they are children, will
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/25
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Through this grant, we would put together a team, as we talked back in '23, to put together a standard
- Through this grant, we would put together a team, as we talked back in '23, to put together a standard
- course of training that would standard course of training that would be<00:19:37.120><c> able</c><00
- It's mandated by the POST Board, so the Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, and they hold our
- It's mandated by the POST Board, so the Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, and they hold our
Committee:
House Public Safety Finance and Policy
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Executive Departments and Administration (02/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Similarly, I understand that we're taking out the sustaining of certification standards.
- How frequently are those certification standards met?
- </c><00:12:25.000><c> how</c> of certification standards how of certification standards how frequently
- 26.320><c> certification</c> frequently are those certification frequently are those certification standards
- and all sorts of data and New standards and all sorts of data and New Hampshire<01:07:06.839><c> is<
Summary:
The committee first heard House Bill 180, which concerns critical incident stress management teams. Representative Mark PR, the bill sponsor, proposed an amendment to add a definition of “team leader” and to clarify that teams may or may not be affiliated with a municipality. He argued that a certification test offered by the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation is unnecessary and too expensive at $400, since team members are volunteers who already receive training and continuing education. Committee members asked about the training structure and certification language, and the sponsor explained that the teams are self-certified and that the amendment was intended to clean up the bill’s language.
The committee then voted on HB 180 in executive session. Amendment 0261H was adopted 11-0, and the bill was then moved as amended and passed 11-0. The committee placed the bill on consent.
Later, the committee heard House Bill 438, sponsored by Representative Timothy Horan, dealing with immigration detention and related state policy. Horan described the bill as an update to earlier legislation and said it would codify best practices, prohibit state cooperation with mass deportation efforts, bar for-profit operation of immigration detention facilities, and require Executive Council approval before the governor could deploy the National Guard for immigration deportation activities. Committee members questioned whether the bill could be read as authorizing detention facilities and discussed the relationship between the state and Strafford County Jail. An amendment presented on behalf of Representative Patrick Long was described as a technical rewrite that removed several sections and changed language, but the hearing ended before any vote was taken on HB 438.