Video & Transcript Research : 'Type C'
Page 48 of 500
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- c> type of cause of action. type of cause of action. this<00:42:16.960><c> isc><00:42:17.200><c>
- > ofc><01:10:33.360><c> casesc><01:10:33.679><c> onc><01:10:33.840><c> theirc> pursue these types
- 01:25:43.679><c> typec><01:25:43.920><c> ofc><01:25:44.400><c> incentivec><01:25:45.280><c> in<
- /c><01:25:45.600><c> placec><01:25:46.960><c> toc> this type of incentive in place to this type of
- c><01:28:00.719><c> actionc><01:28:01.920><c> allowingc><01:28:02.320><c> forc> other type of
Keywords:
felony, law enforcement, police officer, criminal penalties, public safety, sex offender, child care facility, residency restrictions, criminal law, sex offenders, child care facilities, legislation, false claims, civil penalties, state accountability, whistleblower protection, fraud prevention, 916, all
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/26
Transportation Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- c> arec><00:16:16.720><c> notc> These types of vehicles are not These types of vehicles are not available
- > notc><00:35:24.480><c> comparingc><00:35:24.800><c> ac><00:35:25.040><c> corec> type.
- ><c> isc><00:40:19.839><c> anotherc> Changing the service type is another Changing the service type
- c><00:51:38.559><c> mayc><00:51:38.880><c> bec> types of transit services may be types of transit
- c> type of service. type of service. >> Okay,<01:30:24.159><c> good.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> numbersc><00:09:29.480><c> isc><00:09:29.640><c> thec><00:09:29.800><c> highestc> types
- 23:20.760><c> typesc> the species that we have uh those types the species that we have uh those types
- typesc><00:37:46.400><c> ofc><00:37:46.560><c> Partnershipsc><00:37:47.079><c> inc><00:37:47.200
- ><c> mindc><00:37:47.480><c> soc> those types of Partnerships in mind so those types of Partnerships
- ><c> Oldc><01:30:14.480><c> Barnc><01:30:15.280><c> typec> they have a historic um Old Barn type
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Health Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25 - Part 1
Health Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- is going<00:50:32.720><c> withc><00:50:33.040><c> thesec><00:50:33.359><c> typesc><00:50:33.680
- c> going with these types of proposals. going with these types of proposals.
- c><00:54:31.119><c> types,c> coverage for all insurance types, coverage for all insurance types,
- typec><01:21:50.400><c> wherec><01:21:50.719><c> thec><01:21:50.960><c> pharmaciesc><01:21:51.440
- ><c> havec> pricing type where the pharmacies have pricing type where the pharmacies have to<01:21:
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on State and Local Government - 03/24/26
State and Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- 01:38.640><c> thatc><00:01:38.840><c> ifc><00:01:38.960><c> thec><00:01:39.080><c> evidencec>
- ><c> 3854c><00:03:03.760><c> isc><00:03:03.959><c> laidc><00:03:04.200><c> overc><00:03:04.600
- c> Ic><00:21:19.480><c> havec><00:21:19.800><c> isc><00:21:19.960><c> aboutc><00:21:20.760><c
- c><00:38:29.520><c> bec><00:38:30.120><c> allc><00:38:30.680><c> typesc><00:38:31.080><c> of<
- /c> brought out to just be all types of brought out to just be all types of employees<00:38:32.120><c
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Columns B and C, you have the fund type and the type of action.
- Columns B and C, you have the fund type and the type of action.
- /c><00:04:19.320><c> havec><00:04:19.519><c> thec><00:04:19.640><c> fundc><00:04:20.000><c> type
- c> Columns B and C, you have the fund type Columns B and C, you have the fund type and<00:04:20.920
- ><c> thec><00:04:21.000><c> typec><00:04:21.200><c> ofc><00:04:21.760><c> umc> and the type of
MS
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:47:44.319><c> Certainlyc><00:47:44.720><c> thec><00:47:44.960><c> borderingc> type of model
- :06.240><c> typesc><00:50:06.559><c> ofc><00:50:06.720><c> providersc><00:50:07.200><c> thatc
- ><00:50:07.440><c> don'tc><00:50:07.680><c> getc> are types of providers that don't get are types
- c><01:06:01.680><c> somec><01:06:01.920><c> typec> facilities and provide provide some type facilities
- 18.000><c> know,c><01:09:18.960><c> wherec> types of services where, you know, where types of services
Summary:
The committee heard presentations on several Medicaid-related topics. First, a pharmacy representative discussed nonopioid pain medications as a way to reduce opioid dependence and overdose risk, emphasizing that options such as acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and topical diclofenac can be useful for pain management. She cautioned that nonopioids can still have risks and said any policy should avoid requiring patients to step through opioids before accessing safer alternatives, while still allowing reasonable step therapy among nonopioid options. The presenter said the goal is to keep patients from being pushed toward opioids by cost or insurance design.
The committee also heard emotional testimony from parents of a child with Prader-Willi syndrome, who described the condition as a rare genetic disorder that causes severe, lifelong hyperphagia and requires rigid supervision and ongoing treatment. They argued that alternative funding programs can disrupt access to medically necessary drugs such as human growth hormone, forcing families into costly and uncertain coverage gaps. They asked lawmakers to ensure insurance coverage remains stable for rare disease patients and thanked Senator Blackwell for prior support of rare disease legislation.
Next, a Livanova representative urged the committee to support higher Medicaid reimbursement for vagus nerve stimulator surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. He said inadequate hospital reimbursement has reduced access in Mississippi, causing patients to travel long distances or go without treatment, and argued that better reimbursement would improve outcomes and save money over time. He cited studies showing seizure reductions, lower ER use, and a projected $2.8 million in five-year savings for Medicaid based on 40 patients, and asked that hospitals be reimbursed at 100% of Medicare rates for the procedure codes.
Finally, a Medicaid official gave a broad overview of hospital payment structure, including fee-for-service, managed care, MHAP, DSH, UPL, provider taxes, and related funding mechanisms. She explained that hospital payments are interrelated and have shifted over time, with major changes tied to managed care, MHAP/UPL increases, and provider taxes. At the end of the discussion, the committee was running short on time and asked her to skip ahead to the provider tax component; no votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 1/21/25
Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Transcript Highlights:
- :57:04.400><c> ofc><00:57:04.520><c> thec><00:57:04.720><c> casec><00:57:05.000><c> typesc> you
- can see for each of the case types you can see for each of the case types that<00:57:05.599><c> our<
- on how many um um do you keep statistics on how many um immigration<01:05:20.240><c> typec><01:05:
- 20.520><c> issuesc><01:05:21.240><c> thatc><01:05:21.359><c> you'rec> immigration type issues that
- you're immigration type issues that you're dealing<01:05:21.960><c> withc><01:05:22.960><c> through
Summary:
The House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee met to approve the January 16 minutes and then heard a budget presentation from State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba on behalf of the Minnesota judicial branch. Shorba described the courts’ structure, mission, and workload, noting 322 judges, about 2,800 staff, roughly 1 million district court filings annually, and a current budget of about $479 million. He emphasized the branch’s constitutional obligation to provide fair and timely access to justice and said the courts are funded almost entirely through legislative appropriations. He also highlighted recent accomplishments made possible by prior legislative funding, including eliminating the pandemic felony and gross misdemeanor backlog, expanding remote and hybrid hearings, improving courtroom technology, sustaining treatment courts, and increasing pay for interpreters and psychological examiners.
Shorba outlined the judicial branch’s 2026–27 budget request, which he said totals a 12% increase over the starting biennial base. Major requests included $77.3 million in 2026–27 and $104 million in 2028–29 for a 6% judicial salary increase and related compensation costs; $5.1 million in 2026–27 and $1.76 million in 2028–29 for digital accessibility compliance with new federal ADA rules; $4 million in 2026–27 and $800,000 in 2028–29 to modernize justice partner access to court records; $7.2 million in 2026–27 to raise pay for contract psychological examiners; and $18 million in 2026–27 to increase juror pay from $20 to $100 per day and align mileage rates with federal rates. He also discussed ongoing funding needs for interpreter services, jury costs, cybersecurity, and other statutorily required court services, saying temporary funding provided in the prior session will expire and that permanent support is needed.
Members asked questions about treatment courts, employee bargaining, and mental health competency issues. Representative Eric requested more detail on funding for newly launched and existing treatment courts, and Shorba said many treatment courts begin with federal grants before transitioning to state support after about three years. He confirmed the judicial branch negotiates its own employee contracts rather than the executive branch doing so, and said the branch has three unions plus many unrepresented employees. On mental health and competency, Shorba said the branch is focused on obtaining timely psychological evaluations and is not responsible for treatment services themselves, but acknowledged a shortage of examiners and treatment beds and said a related competency board would be testifying the following week. No votes or formal actions were taken beyond adoption of the minutes.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> toc> type uh it says go that refers to type uh it says go that refers to General<00:26:13.880>
- fundingc><00:26:18.640><c> typec><00:26:18.880><c> thatc> most common um uh funding type that
- most common um uh funding type that you'll<00:26:19.159><c> seec><00:26:19.600><c> inc><00:26:19.840
- the year this is how much is left of the various<00:43:53.520><c> typesc><00:43:53.760><c> ofc><
- :43:55.200><c> canc><00:43:55.319><c> seec> various types of bonds uh so you can see various types
Summary:
The Capital Investment Committee met on January 16 for an informational overview on state bonding and capital investment. House Research analyst Chelsea Griffin and House Fiscal analyst Andrew Lee explained the nonpartisan roles of their offices and then walked members through the basics of Minnesota bonding: how bonds are issued and repaid, how they are categorized, and the main legal authorities governing state general obligation bonds, including the state constitution, Minnesota statutes, and federal tax law. Griffin emphasized that state GO bond proceeds must be used for a public purpose, for a purpose authorized in the constitution, as specifically described in law, and must mature within 20 years. She also noted that state GO bonding is typically originated in the House and that capital projects financed with state GO bonds generally require a three-fifths vote in each chamber.
The presentation also covered practical limits and requirements on bonding projects, including the distinction between state and local GO bonding, the role of bond counsel, restrictions on bond-financed property, the prohibition on reimbursing already-paid costs, and the full funding and non-state match requirements. In response to member questions, Griffin clarified that the full funding requirement in section 16A.502 means a project must be fully funded before the appropriation is available, while section 16A.86 reflects an expectation that local governments provide about half the financing for local projects, though the legislature can choose to fund more than half or waive a local match. She also said she did not believe a bill to make the 50 percent match requirement statutory passed last session.
Lee then began a spreadsheet-based overview of the 2023 capital budget laws, explaining how capital investment spreadsheets are organized and how different fund types appear in the documents. He highlighted examples such as University of Minnesota projects funded with GO bonds and Minnesota State projects using user financing, where the system contributes a share of project costs from non-state sources such as tuition or system revenues. The committee did not take any votes or formal actions during this informational meeting.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:39:09.160><c> Soc><00:39:09.320><c> it'sc> bodily injury type of behavior.
- whatc><00:40:34.800><c> theirc> any type of student no matter what their any type of student no matter
- So, I'm not saying that these types<01:26:49.440><c> ofc> types of types of organizations<01:26:52.920
- ><c> types.
- ac><02:01:48.200><c> bonafidec><02:01:49.320><c> typec><02:01:49.560><c> ofc><02:01:49.680><
Keywords:
teacher pay, teacher salaries, salary step increase, annual increment, longevity step, public school teachers, public charter school teachers, collective bargaining, Hawaii Department of Education, teacher retention, teacher recruitment, cost of living, educator compensation, public employee bargaining, appropriation, salary schedule, school staffing, teacher shortage, HB1888, Hawaii
Summary:
The committees heard three measures, beginning with HB 1890 HD3, which would provide automatic step increases and a COVID-era retention bonus for teachers. Supporters included HSTA, the Democratic Party’s Education Caucus, and a student who said higher pay and predictable salary growth would help retain teachers in Hawaii. The Department of Education supported the intent but asked that the bill be expanded to cover all department employees. The Attorney General’s office said the draft needed clarification to avoid conflict with Chapter 89 and to make clear any funding was subject to legislative appropriation. The Office of the Public Defender and B&F testified in opposition, and committee members questioned whether the step increases were already in the current contract and whether the bill was needed. HSTA said the current contract includes automatic step increases subject to funding, but argued the bill was still needed because funding is not guaranteed and the measure would codify the policy. HSTA also said the COVID bonus would apply only to active teachers who worked during the pandemic and estimated the total cost at roughly $150 million to $200 million over four years. No vote was taken in the portion provided.
The committee then took up HB 1888 HD3, which would require DOE and charter schools to report harassment incidents and strengthen penalties for harassment of educational workers from a petty misdemeanor to a misdemeanor. DOE supported the bill and suggested narrowing language about assisting workers with temporary restraining orders, saying that function would be better handled through the Attorney General’s pilot program. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing the harassment language was overly broad, vague, and potentially unconstitutional, and that existing assault and terroristic threatening statutes already protect educational workers. HSTA, the State Commission on the Status of Women, and several individual testifiers supported the measure, describing increased intimidation and harassment of teachers and other school staff, especially since COVID. The Special Education Advisory Council opposed the bill’s language on “disrupting and interfering” with school functions, saying it could chill parents of students with IEPs from advocating for their children. Testimony was split, with the chair noting 20 in support and 16 in opposition in the portion shown.
A final witness, Michelle Pestana, testified in opposition based on her family’s experience with special education services, describing alleged seclusion and restraint of her daughter and expressing concern that DOE testimony in prior hearings had targeted special education parents. Her remarks were cut off as time expired. The transcript ends before any committee action or vote on HB 1888 was taken.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Public Pension Oversight Board (2-24-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- 56.600><c> projectionsc><00:15:57.399><c> andc><00:15:57.560><c> thec><00:15:57.800><c> typec
- > those are the projections and the type those are the projections and the type of<00:15:58.120><c> mechanisms
- ><c> anyc><00:22:02.480><c> typec><00:22:02.640><c> ofc> advisors not having any type of advisors
- not having any type of oversight<00:22:03.480><c> orc><00:22:03.840><c> accountabilityc><00:22:04.840
- of financial advisor and any other type of financial adviser<00:23:54.520><c> that'sc><00:23:54.880
Keywords:
Meeting Start: 00:17
Attendance Roll Call: 00:41
Approval of Minutes: 02:40
HB 694: 03:16
SB 183: 18:32
Discussion on PPOB Membership: 36:10
Adjournment: 42:35, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes from its January 27 meeting and then took up House Bill 694, which would create a default rule for the Teachers’ Retirement System health insurance trust fund once it reaches 100% funding, currently anticipated around 2027. The bill would redirect two funding streams now going to the health trust—state payments on behalf of local districts and other employer contributions—into TRS pension benefits if the health fund reaches and maintains full funding. The sponsor said this would add about $154 million annually to TRS pensions and would only serve as a default if no other plan is adopted later.
Members asked whether the bill would shift the unfunded liability to teachers or affect employee contributions. The sponsor and staff said it would not shift liability to teachers and would not change the employee contribution; only the employer-side payments would be redirected. Several members asked about the meaning of actuarial 100% funding, whether the fund could fall back below 100%, and whether employee contributions might be reduced in the future. The sponsor said the bill is based on actuarial projections, would revert the money back to the health trust if funding fell below 100%, and does not prevent future legislative or board action. Senator Higdon and others spoke in support of discussing the issue, noting the 2010 shared-responsibility changes and the need for a default approach as full funding is reached.
The committee then heard Senate Bill 183, which would amend Kentucky law governing proxy advisers used by retirement systems. The sponsor said the bill would require proxy advisers, when handling shareholder-sponsored proposals, to act solely in the interest of retirement system members and beneficiaries and to provide an economic analysis when voting against a company board’s recommendation. He argued the measure is aimed at proxy advisers such as ISS and Glass Lewis, which he said often advance ESG-related proposals not tied to shareholder value. A guest from APCIA said the bill is meant to distinguish proxy advisers from investment managers and to strengthen the 2023 law by requiring a clearer economic justification for votes that depart from board recommendations.
Members asked how proxy advisers differ from other financial advisers, whether Kentucky uses them, and whether the bill would prevent pension funds from investing in companies with ESG factors if those investments are profitable. The sponsor and guest said the bill would not bar such investments; it is intended to regulate proxy voting recommendations, not investment decisions. They described the bill as a proactive measure to reinforce fiduciary responsibility and limit outside proxy influence on pension voting. No final vote on either bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on State and Local Government - 04/08/25
State and Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- c><01:33:05.520><c> largerc><01:33:05.840><c> typec><01:33:06.239><c> andc><01:33:06.480><c>
- c> typesc><01:48:49.199><c> ofc><01:48:49.360><c> businessc> different types of business different
- ><c> basedc><01:48:52.719><c> onc><01:48:52.880><c> thec><01:48:53.119><c> typec><01:48:53.199
- ><c> taxc><02:11:26.880><c> typesc><02:11:27.199><c> thatc><02:11:27.440><c> collectc> over 30
- c> taxc><02:11:39.920><c> typesc><02:11:40.320><c> generatec><02:11:40.719><c> overc> families
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (02/10/2026)
Environment and Agriculture
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> imposingc><00:07:12.960><c> thesec><00:07:13.280><c> typesc><00:07:13.520><c> ofc> start
- ><c> beforec><01:13:57.840><c> andc><01:13:58.159><c> thosec><01:13:58.400><c> typesc><01:13:
- c> soc><04:06:23.040><c> manyc><04:06:23.199><c> typesc><04:06:23.520><c> ofc><04:06:23.680><
- ><c> knowc><04:54:40.878><c> cyclicalc><04:54:41.520><c> kindc><04:54:41.760><c> ofc> type of
- ><c> typesc><05:10:00.718><c> ofc><05:10:00.878><c> facilitiesc><05:10:01.360><c> thatc><05:10
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (04/16/2026)
Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- c> typesc><00:15:52.960><c> ofc><00:15:53.040><c> programs.
- c> type of roof. type of roof.
- ><c> thatc><01:25:29.160><c> theyc> trying to get the type of care that they trying to get the type
- ><c> boundaryc> have some type of boundary have some type of boundary um<04:38:02.760><c> onc><04
- some type of a and you know, some type of a advice<05:08:27.640><c> toc><05:08:27.760><c> helpc><
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Public Pension Oversight Board (12-12-25) - Part 2
Transcript Highlights:
- c> that type of coverage.
- c><00:08:21.039><c> toc><00:08:21.360><c> thosec><00:08:21.680><c> whoc> types of minimal benefits
- that<00:14:00.399><c> hazardousc><00:14:01.040><c> typec><00:14:01.199><c> ofc><00:14:01.440><c
- c><00:14:02.160><c> So,c><00:14:02.720><c> soc> that hazardous type of position.
- ><c> obviousc><00:24:01.840><c> hec> types of benefits when it's obvious he types of benefits when
Summary:
The committee heard testimony from Rep. Ashley Tacket Laferty on a bill to expand minimum hazardous-duty retirement and health benefits for certain public safety workers injured in the line of duty. She used a video and examples from Floyd County to describe officers and an emergency management director who were catastrophically injured but did not qualify for existing hazardous-duty coverage because their employers had enrolled them in non-hazardous retirement plans. The bill would provide a minimum benefit of 25% of pay, plus 10% for dependent children and limited health coverage, for eligible workers who cannot return to hazardous work. Laferty said the proposal would apply retroactively through a five-year window, estimated to affect a limited number of workers statewide, and would be funded by small increases in employer contribution rates. Committee members questioned how many former employees might qualify, how the bill interacts with the pension system, and who would pay the added cost. Discussion also noted that local governments choose whether to place employees in hazardous or non-hazardous coverage, largely based on cost. The sheriff’s association was present online in support, and no vote was taken.
The committee then heard Rep. Daniel Gber present a revised bill allowing teachers and school district employees to use accumulated sick leave to observe religious holidays not already on the school calendar, if they provide a personal statement and sufficient advance notice. He said the measure is intended to address the rigid school calendar and the difficulty teachers face in observing non-school holidays without losing service credit toward retirement. He noted that the earlier version of the bill had allowed make-up work time, but the current draft is shorter and focused on sick leave use. He also referenced a supporting letter from a constituent who could not attend because of weather. The bill was presented for discussion only, with no committee action reported.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (10/23/2025)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- um helping with mental health and and<00:38:51.760><c> thosec><00:38:52.000><c> typesc><00:38:52.160
- c><00:38:52.560><c> It'sc><00:38:52.800><c> justc> and those types of things.
- :39:15.520><c> needc><00:39:15.680><c> toc> types of shops that maybe we need to types of shops that
- ><c> laborc><00:39:22.079><c> typec><00:39:22.880><c> jobsc><00:39:24.079><c> umc><00:39:25.200
- ><c> uhc> potentially manual labor type jobs um uh potentially manual labor type jobs um uh for<00:
Summary:
The public hearing was on an SP 15 replace-all, non-germane amendment to Senate Bill 15, a proposal to require hard labor for certain serious offenses in the New Hampshire prison system. Representative Jennifer Rhodess, the co-sponsor, said the bill is intended to make incarcerated people productive, help reduce costs, and serve as a deterrent; she also noted a two-year effective date for implementation and said anyone who refuses hard labor would receive a 50% sentence increase. She framed the work as ordinary labor already done by many people in the state and said the committee would later hear related testimony and possible amendments.
Committee members questioned how the proposal would work in practice, especially for people already incarcerated, the difference between current prison work and the bill’s “hard labor,” and the impact on prison security and staffing. Rhodess said the bill only applies going forward, not retroactively, and that the Department of Corrections could better address operational details. Members also discussed the terminology, noting that “capital murder” is not a current New Hampshire charge and that the relevant offense is first-degree murder with mandatory life without parole.
Department of Corrections officials Jane Graham and Nicholas Duffy testified in a neutral position but raised significant implementation concerns. They said the department would need more resources, vehicles, security equipment, and possibly armed supervision for higher-risk crews, and noted a 47% corrections officer vacancy rate. Duffy described current work programs inside prisons and in the community, including correctional industries, kitchen and education jobs, transitional work crews, and community service projects such as road work and landscaping. He explained that current community crews are limited by custody level, court approval, staffing, and safety, and said C1 and C2 inmates are already in transitional or work-release settings, while C3 and higher inmates would pose greater risks if taken outside the walls. No vote was taken during the hearing.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
- :04:32.160><c> number,c><00:04:32.880><c> types,c><00:04:33.919><c> amounts,c><00:04:34.960><c>
- typec><00:35:56.800><c> issues.
- ><c> somec><00:36:02.960><c> typec><00:36:03.119><c> ofc> issue if we're putting some type of issue
- And so those<00:52:15.280><c> typesc><00:52:15.520><c> ofc><00:52:15.680><c> thingsc><00:52:15.920
- c> upc> those types of things we need to amp up those types of things we need to amp up those<00:52
Summary:
The committee first considered House Bill 774, the Cost, Fines, and Fees Reporting Act, which would require data collection and reporting on criminal and traffic-related costs, fines, fees, interest, and late fees in Kentucky. Vice Chair Decker said the bill is intended to improve transparency and accountability, not to change collection policy. A representative from Reason Foundation supported the measure, saying policymakers need reliable data on legal financial obligations. Representative Marzian asked whether the bill would help enforce collection, and Decker replied that it is only a study/data bill. During roll call, some members raised concerns about funding, but Decker said Kentucky Stats already has the staff and systems in place. The bill passed favorably with 18 yes votes, no no votes, and two pass votes.
The committee then took up House Bill 542, relating to eminent domain and declared an emergency, and adopted a committee substitute before hearing testimony. The sponsor described the bill as the product of extensive revisions and said it was aimed at improving notice, communication, transparency, and fairness in condemnation proceedings. He said property owners would have to be notified by certified mail or hand delivery, with sworn proof if delivery failed, and that condemning authorities could not make false or misleading statements during negotiations. A guest, Stephanie Barnett, described problems in her own eminent domain experience, including notices going to the wrong address and learning after the fact that people had been on her property. Members generally supported the bill as a fairness measure. It passed the committee substitute unanimously, 20-0.
Finally, Representatives Flannery and Whitaker presented House Bill 563, a DUI-related measure intended to reduce deaths and injuries caused by repeat drunk drivers. They said the bill would apply to a fourth DUI offense within 10 years and would place a two-year restriction on alcohol sales, marked on the person’s license or ID, with the goal of both public safety and encouraging treatment. Flannery cited the death of his mother by a repeat drunk driver and shared statistics on fatal crashes and the economic costs of drunk driving. The committee began discussion on the bill, but the transcript cuts off before any vote or final action is shown.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (11/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- :07.600><c> atc><00:33:07.760><c> thesec><00:33:08.000><c> typesc> inspectors who could look at
- typesc><00:33:43.519><c> ofc><00:33:44.720><c> umc> blessing to do these types of um blessing
- <c> anyc><00:40:59.119><c> typec><00:40:59.280><c> ofc> You're not talking about any type of You're
- You're not talking about any<00:41:02.079><c> typec><00:41:02.400><c> ofc><00:41:02.640><c> courses
- c><00:41:03.680><c> You'rec><00:41:04.000><c> talkingc> any type of courses.
Summary:
The committee held a work session on House Bill 396, which would exempt meat and meat food products slaughtered and prepared in-state for in-state sale from certain inspections. Representative Comtois explained her amendment, saying she tried to address prior concerns by limiting the number processed monthly, adding a registration and disclaimer requirement, and folding beef, swine, sheep, and goats into the bill’s framework. Members discussed whether some sections from earlier language on bison, elk, and red deer had been inadvertently struck, and Comtois said she did not intend to remove those protections and would restore them if needed.
Several members raised drafting and policy concerns. Representative Miner suggested the waiver language should be a signed, notarized statement kept on file rather than filed with the Department of Agriculture, and Comtois agreed. Representative Gruber and Representative Scully discussed labeling and wording, including clarifying that the meat would not be “exempt” from federal inspection in the same way as non-amenable species, and adding language that any prosecution would be federal rather than state. There was also discussion about whether ground meat should be included for the amenable species, with Miner and Comtois indicating that excluding ground meat would reduce risk.
Commissioner Sean Jasper of the Department of Agriculture, Markets, and Food testified strongly against the bill, saying it was a step in the wrong direction, lacked consumer protections, and could jeopardize food safety and the state’s meat processing system. He argued that the federal exemption for non-amenable species could not simply be extended to new species by state law, warned that USDA could respond by withdrawing federal inspections, and said the bill would not solve the real bottlenecks in slaughter capacity. He also said he did not believe there was a general shortage of inspectors, and that the practical issue was producers not scheduling animals year-round, which forces facilities to scale to the slow season. No vote was taken during the work session, and members continued discussing possible amendments and wording changes.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Penalty for misconduct of public officer or employee enhanced 3/11/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:02:55.520><c> typec><00:02:55.720><c> ofc><00:02:55.800><c> behavior,c> But if they are
- , that type of behavior, But if they are, that type of behavior, I<00:02:56.400><c> think,c><00:02:
- take a look at this<00:46:14.440><c> specificc><00:46:15.320><c> typec><00:46:15.600><c> ofc><00
- :46:15.720><c> conductc><00:46:16.200><c> that'sc> this specific type of conduct that's this specific
- type of conduct that's noted<00:46:16.600><c> inc><00:46:16.680><c> thec><00:46:16.760><c> KSTP<
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 04/10/25
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- 00:26:44.159><c> typesc><00:26:44.480><c> ofc><00:26:44.760><c> injectionsc><00:26:45.760><c> but
- some type<00:31:22.240><c> ofc><00:31:22.399><c> accessc><00:31:22.720><c> toc><00:31:22.880><c
- 32:02.799><c> shouldc><00:32:03.039><c> bec><00:32:03.440><c> thec><00:32:03.760><c> typec><00
- ><c> typesc><01:10:23.360><c> ofc><01:10:23.520><c> billsc><01:10:23.840><c> likec> committee
- :49.000><c> typesc><01:40:50.119><c> andc><01:40:51.119><c> itc><01:40:51.360><c> hasc><01:40