Video & Transcript Research : 'user fees'

Page 47 of 491
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Fri Jan 31, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 1090, relating to county user fees.
  • of hawaian homelands from County user of hawaian homelands from County user fees fees fees in<01
  • <01:32:00.719> and charges or user fees uh to create and charges or user fees uh to create
  • That one, you're right, it's user fees.
  • > user<01:43:17.159> fees<01:43:17.400> goes fees well that the user fees goes fees
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 410, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs’ biennium operating budget. OHA asked for a modest increase over its base budget, including $1.2 million to fund 13 new full-time positions for a strategy and implementation team tied to its long-term plan, with emphasis on housing, education, health, and economic resilience. OHA also described a broader effort to work directly with executive branch departments to improve outcomes for Native Hawaiians. Testimony was largely supportive, with several individuals speaking in favor and one testifier expressing strong frustration about Native Hawaiian rights and access to resources. The chair noted there were 38 additional written/supporting testimonies and three in opposition. Members asked about OHA’s funding sources and public land trust revenues; OHA said it is not receiving the full 20 percent share, described a public land trust working group and system issues, and said a related bill would seek funding to begin an inventory. No vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee then considered House Bill 304, which would make the Hawaiian version of a law binding when the law was originally drafted in Hawaiian and later translated into English. The Judiciary supported the bill, saying it reinforces Hawaiian as an official language and looks to the original language for legislative intent. The Attorney General supported the intent but recommended narrowing the bill with a proviso to avoid ambiguities, limiting it to laws originally drafted in Hawaiian that were not later amended, codified, recodified, or reenacted in English. Public testimony was generally supportive, though one speaker raised broader sovereignty concerns. Members questioned how many laws would be affected and whether the proposed amendment would undercut the bill; the Attorney General said the amendment was meant to address uncertainty in interpretation. No final action was reported. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 603, which would direct OHA to administer a Native Hawaiian business marketing program to promote Native Hawaiian-owned businesses through marketing and technical assistance. OHA supported the concept, saying a label or branding program could help consumers identify and support Native Hawaiian-owned businesses, but requested that funding be redirected to a working group to study program design, implementation, enforcement, and long-term viability. The chair noted four supportive testimonies had been received, and a member asked OHA to confirm that its programs serve all Hawaiians, not only those eligible for homelands; OHA said it serves all Hawaiians in the state. The transcript ends before any vote or further action on HB 603.
NM
Transcript Highlights:
  • User fees align supply and demand, helping to prevent under-use and over-use of the roads by furnishing
  • transportation funds with transportation user fees rather than general funds or other unrelated funding
  • The tax is essentially a sales tax on vehicles, not really an actual user fee for transportation.
  • However, registration fees are a poor proxy for a user fee for the road, since they do not capture the
  • A vehicle miles traveled tax, also sometimes called a mileage-based user tax, fee, road usage charge,
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Transportation - 03/11/26

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • fee.
  • And we do support applying the mileage-based user fee to EVs and all efficient vehicles as Virginia does
  • And we do support applying the mileage-based user fee to EVs and all efficient vehicles as Virginia does
  • And we do support applying the mileage-based user fee to EVs and all efficient vehicles as Virginia does
  • And we do support applying the mileage-based user fee to EVs and all efficient vehicles as Virginia does
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/23/2026 - Arizona Off-Highway Vehicle Study Committee

Arizona Off-Highway Vehicle Study Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • becomes a $10 fee or $11 fee or $5 — whatever that number is.
  • So what we're talking about here is we're not saying OHV users cause this damage, therefore OHV users
  • Also, the OHV user indicia fees then get distributed into the off-highway vehicle recreation fund, but
  • And the fee increase—how do we utilize all that as one group of off-road users as we transition?
  • Chair, from the users... ...from the user standpoint, we realize that the fees are low.
Keywords: 1182, all
Summary: The Arizona Off-Highway Vehicle Study Committee met with a quorum and heard opening remarks from members and stakeholders representing OHV users, ranching, state agencies, land management, law enforcement, and industry. The committee reviewed Senate Bill 1519, which would raise the OHV/ATV weight threshold from 2,500 to 3,500 pounds, create an OHV Law Enforcement Fund, direct certain vehicle license tax revenue to that fund, and allow some OHV recreation on state trust lands under existing permit rules. Members discussed the fiscal and policy implications of changing the weight threshold and whether to keep the current Highway User Revenue Fund structure intact or redirect revenue for OHV enforcement and mitigation. Industry testimony estimated roughly 11,000 new off-road vehicles were sold in Arizona in 2025, with about 24% over 2,500 pounds, and committee members debated whether a flat sticker fee increase or a revenue-neutral adjustment would be cleaner than shifting VLT revenue. The committee also reviewed Senate Bill 1567, enacted in 2024, which requires OHV owners to complete an online education course before receiving an OHV indicia, with a report due December 1, 2026 and repeal of the requirement in 2027. Game and Fish staff said the education requirement has already appeared to improve behavior, especially helmet use by children. Several witnesses supported expanding education to all operators, not just owners, and suggested a single statewide course for consistency and easier enforcement. A nonprofit representative described plans for an OHV ambassador/education program and said it would support a universal training requirement and self-policing efforts. A major portion of the meeting focused on funding needs for OHV law enforcement and resource mitigation. Based on prior committee direction, outside stakeholders presented estimates that county law enforcement needs could total about $3.5 million annually, while natural resource damage and road decommissioning needs could average about $7.5 million annually over time, for a combined target of roughly $11 million per year. The discussion emphasized that the estimate was intended as a broad target rather than a precise census, and that it did not include all possible costs such as fence repair, tank restoration, or environmental compliance. Members and witnesses discussed soft versus hard road closures, the need to prioritize resource protection areas, and the importance of pairing mitigation projects with enforcement and education so that repaired areas are not quickly damaged again. No formal votes were taken in the portion provided, but the committee appeared to be gathering information to guide future recommendations on fees, funding channels, and education policy.
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Session - 2026-05-28 - 2:50PM

Vermont House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • fee, and the mileage-based user fee will go into effect January 1st, 2027, and those revenues will go
  • <00:03:29.040> fee<00:03:29.760> and is certainly mileage-based user fee and is certainly
  • mileage-based user fee and the<00:03:30.280> mileage-based<00:03:30.760> user<00:03:31.000
  • user fee will go into the mileage-based user fee will go into effect<00:03:31.959> January<00
  • user fee being the but the mileage base user fee being the biggest<00:04:15.520> one.
Keywords: 926, house, all
Summary: The House took up the Committee of Conference report on House Bill 944, the fiscal year 2027 transportation program and related transportation law changes. The Speaker first suspended the rules to consider the report immediately. A member from Swanton then outlined the conference committee’s main agreements, saying the House Transportation Committee was pleased with the result. The report’s major provisions included a mileage-based user fee for battery electric vehicles beginning January 1, 2027, at 1.4 cents per mile, with multiple payment options and a directive for the Agency of Transportation to return with recommendations on eventually adding plug-in hybrid vehicles. The member also highlighted shifting $1.7 million from town highway aid to state paving, an additional $300,000 from the general fund for volunteer driver and mobility programs, a recommendation to study bonding as a way to advance transportation projects, consumer-protection style rules for EV charging price transparency, and changes to dates related to the Caledonia airport sale. The member noted the conference committee accepted the Senate’s position on making obsolete Connecticut River log-drive rules obsolete. After brief remarks, the House voted on the conference report. The chair called for a voice vote, the ayes appeared to have it, and the report of the committee of conference was adopted. The House then noted that additional Senate bills might come over later and recessed until 4:00 p.m.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 04/10/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • that's in addition to the fee revenue that's deposited into the Highway User Trust Fund.
  • you know, mile-based user fee, and there are different permutations of that.
  • you know, mile-based user fee, and there are different permutations of that.
  • you know, mile-based user fee, and there are different permutations of that.
  • user charge or you know mile based user user charge or you know mile based user fee<00:17:38.640
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Electricity as Vehicle Fuel Working Group 9/15/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • um, uh, you know, the taxes and fees um, uh, you know, the taxes and fees that<00:03:49.120>
  • so we talk about basing fees on weight. so we talk about basing fees on weight.
  • Those ranged from fuel tax increases or tab fee changes, as well as things around road user charges,
  • across the country right now is EV fees. across the country right now is EV fees.
  • There wasn't a federal EV tax, or an additional federal EVP fee. …or an additional federal EV fee.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The meeting was the first session of the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Electricity as a Vehicle Fuel Working Group. Commissioner Nancy Doenberger opened with introductions from members representing state agencies, legislators, utilities, local governments, industry groups, advocacy organizations, and others. The group then elected its leadership: Senator Anne Johnson Stewart was nominated and unanimously elected chair, and Representative Steve Elkins was nominated and unanimously elected vice chair. Senator Johnson Stewart said she would ensure all viewpoints are heard and asked MnDOT to continue running the meeting for practical reasons. Austin Turman of the Legislative Coordinating Commission reviewed the authorizing legislation. He explained that the working group must analyze electricity used as vehicle fuel infrastructure opportunities and barriers, develop a roadmap with policy and funding recommendations for sustainable transportation funding consistent with the Minnesota Constitution, and study other states’ approaches to equitable fuel assessment methods for electric vehicles. The group’s report is due February 13 and will go to the governor and legislative transportation leaders. Turman also briefly reviewed open meeting law requirements, noting the group must operate publicly when a quorum discusses official business, though public comment is not required. Members then discussed the purpose of the group and the need to find a fair replacement or supplement for declining gas tax revenue as EVs increase. Senator Johnson Stewart emphasized balancing system funding needs with user-based fairness, including differences in vehicle weight and road use. Representative Murphy stressed the need to consider rural Minnesota, taxpayer impacts, and current science, including climate and CO2 issues. Drive Electric Minnesota said EV drivers should pay their fair share and not be overburdened, while the Department of Revenue said it wants to administer the new EV charging-station tax fairly. A trucking representative highlighted that passenger vehicles and freight vehicles have very different operating and charging needs, suggesting the group consider those differences in any fee structure.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Transportation - 03/26/25

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • :49.440> mileagebased<00:10:50.160> user<00:10:50.480> fee,<00:10:50.880> also
  • as MBUF, mileagebased user fee, also as MBUF, mileagebased user fee, also known<00:10:51.360>
  • Senate File 1480's proposal to adopt a distance-based user fee is a step in the right direction toward
  • <00:18:15.280> fees to assess how distance-based user fees to assess how distance-based user
  • <00:18:23.039> fee contemplates a distance-based user fee contemplates a distance-based user
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • effective user controls over data, including centralized controls.
  • "Please, today, to present AB 1150, which, if approved, would increase the daily maximum user fee that
  • This concept for regulating early termination fees is not unheard of.
  • Although the recent changes in FCC's leadership Termination fees.
  • Rather than outright banning these fees, as the FCC approved, Rather than outright banning these fees
Summary: The committee heard several privacy and consumer protection bills, with most of the discussion focused on AI and social media. AB 1405 would create a state registry for AI auditors and set basic transparency, ethics, and qualification standards for those auditors; supporters said it would build trust and provide a foundation for future AI oversight, while some members questioned whether government should define auditor qualifications instead of industry groups. The bill was moved out on a 5-1 vote to Appropriations, with the roll left open. AB 2, by Assemblymember Lowenthal, would impose enhanced financial penalties on large social media companies when their negligence causes harm to children and teens. Supporters, including a grieving parent and Common Sense Media, argued the bill would create accountability for harmful algorithms and design choices, while opponents from TechNet, EFF, CCIA, and CalChamber warned it was vague, could chill speech, invite censorship, and raise Section 230 and First Amendment concerns. Committee members debated private right of action versus public enforcement, possible shakedown lawsuits, and whether the bill should be narrowed; the bill passed 6-0 to Judiciary with the roll left open. AB 410 would expand California’s bot disclosure law so bots must identify themselves up front and truthfully if asked, rather than only prohibiting deceptive bots in limited commercial or election contexts. Supporters said the measure would help users, especially youth and vulnerable people, know when they are interacting with AI and reduce deception online; one privacy group withdrew opposition after amendments, and other industry groups said they were no longer opposed or had no formal position. The bill passed 9-1 to Appropriations with the roll left open. The committee also approved AB 1327, which lets consumers cancel home improvement contracts by email instead of only by mail and requires phone assistance for cancellations; the Contractor State License Board withdrew opposition after amendments, and the bill passed 11-0 to Judiciary with the roll left open.
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session - 2026-05-08 - 11:30AM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • user fee beyond electric mileage based user fee beyond electric vehicles<01:12:37.760> to<01:
  • You can have it pay just based user fee.
  • Uh, section 20 is a whole user fee transition plan to switch this mileage-based user fee to other vehicles
  • But if you based user fee will work.
  • <02:12:57.840> vehicles, user fee focused on electric vehicles, user fee focused on electric
Keywords: 927, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Mar 24th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Charge no origination fees, late fees, or interest.
  • There's no cap on fees.
  • These fees have gone up. Some didn't charge membership fees; now they do.
  • If users opt for one of the companies that offers a subscription service, the fee is actually paid for
  • users.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Mar 24th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • , late fees, or interest.
  • simply paying bills late and accumulating fees, late fees, penalty fees, interest, and.
  • Is this a membership fee?
  • If users opt for one of these, uh, companies that offers a subscription service, uh, the fee is actually
  • date, and all fees associated with transactions are clearly and transparently communicated to users.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 18th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this is the impact-free credit bill allowing. cities to give credit to impact fees for creative
  • Senate Bill 14, relating to the provision by a political subdivision of credits against impact fees to
  • And the reason why I say public funds is that we just addressed one that's like a tax impact fee, right
  • So basically, this is a fee levied by government. It really is.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 15th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • from the 89th Legislature regular session that authorizes political subdivisions to reduce impact fees
  • 14 by Perry et al. relating to the provision by a political subdivision of credits against impact fees
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary (01/27/2026)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:16:45.759> to the court shall not charge any fee to the court shall not charge any fee
  • But the bottom line is that you would not be if you are a recreational user or a medical card user if
  • recreational user or a medical card user recreational user or a medical card user um<00:43:12.960
  • I'm not paying a fee to have that done. I'm not paying a fee to have that done.
  • still a a fee being paid to the court. still a a fee being paid to the court.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation (01/27/2026)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • actually a user fee. actually a user fee.
  • <01:22:00.639> fee over and over that we are a user fee over and over that we are a user fee
  • <01:31:37.120> fee charging them any type of a user fee charging them any type of a user fee
  • Um, user fees.
  • Um user fees. Now I it can be funded. Um user fees.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 25, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • They added definitions to a new user and a previous unit user.
  • a new user uh and a previous unit user. a new user uh and a previous unit user.
  • You know, they put in a new user, an existing user.
  • So, if they are to even be a user, you have to be a verified user.
  • So, if they are to even be a user, you have to be a verified user.
Bills: HB0075, HB0128
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
  • on an OHV fee?
  • on an OHV fee?
  • The fee is distributed in part to the Highway User Revenue Fund and the rest to the Off-Highway Vehicle
  • fee.
  • I want to raise the fee because I want to, you know, and I’m looking at this from the user standpoint
Keywords: 1182, all
Summary: The committee met to review the state’s off-highway vehicle program, with opening remarks focused on balancing recreation, safety, tourism, and land-use conflicts among OHV users, hikers, bikers, ranchers, and land managers. Arizona State Parks and Trails reported on OHV fund revenues, grant balances, and process changes intended to speed up mitigation and law enforcement spending. The agency said it has tightened grant oversight, eliminated informal grant “buckets,” increased delegated authority for quicker project approval, and is using contracted trail crews for expedited maintenance and mitigation. Examples discussed included fencing and signage at Bulldog Canyon, erosion-control work at Charlew Gap, and a mitigation project at Windmill Mountain Ranch. Members emphasized that prior committee discussions helped recover nearly $4 million from stale grants and redirect it to current priorities. Arizona Game and Fish reported that OHV education and enforcement activity has increased. The mandatory online safety course has been taken by more than 149,000 people through ADOT and 15,000 through Game and Fish, and officers said compliance, especially helmet use by children, has improved. Game and Fish also described its OHV enforcement role, including seven dedicated officers and 97 field officers, training for about 40 agencies, and a new requirement that OHV law be included in police academy curricula starting in 2026. The department said most citations involve no decal, helmet issues, cross-country travel, habitat damage, and reckless driving. Members asked about speeding standards, road use, and a helmet-law conflict involving children in side-by-sides; Game and Fish said it is currently harmonizing the statutes and has treated children in side-by-sides as exempt under the newer provision. ADOT explained the decal and registration process, including the required safety course, the $25 decal, and the new non-resident 30-day permit for certain out-of-state OHVs. Staff also clarified that the course is required for owners, not every occasional operator, and that rental companies are not statutorily required to have each renter take the course, though some do so voluntarily. The committee then heard a legislative overview of recent OHV bills: 2024’s SB 1576 on safety, age, and helmet requirements; 2025’s SB 1517 creating the temporary non-resident permit and extending the study committee; and this year’s SB 1519, which would raise the OHV weight limit from 2,500 to 3,500 pounds and add a proposed new fee class. Members and stakeholders discussed whether the higher weight limit would broaden the OHV category, affect revenue, and better reflect newer, heavier side-by-sides, while some cautioned against blurring the line between OHVs and regular vehicles. No formal votes were taken in the portion provided.