Video & Transcript Research : 'hearing process'

Page 47 of 500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I think that should be a transparent process.
  • I hear it. The rates are high. It's getting difficult.
  • The federal court process is a disaster. I agree with you 100%.
  • Coming in and politicizing the process of insurance rates at that point.
  • , is what I'm hearing from you.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for hearing this bill. We stand on our testimony in strong support.
  • <00:11:08.480> this and thank you for hearing this and thank you for hearing this administration
  • The hearing will stand on its written testimony providing comments. >> Okay. Thank you.
  • The hear will from DHRD with comments.
  • This hearing is adjourned.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to hear them all together.
  • I'm sure in the process of deciding what bill.
  • They can't hear you unless it's up there.
  • I struggle because I hear the pain.
  • In the same process we described before, the civil commitment process, when someone is lawfully detained
Summary: The committee began with member and staff introductions, then took up a series of health and human services bills. The first group focused on radiation protection in cardiac catheterization and other ionizing-radiation procedure rooms: SB 1120 would require at least half of procedure rooms in covered facilities to have a radiation protection system by July 1, 2027; SB 1118 would create a state grant program for rural hospitals to help pay for those systems; and SB 1121 would prohibit requiring lead aprons in rooms equipped with such systems, while allowing voluntary use with a real-time dosimeter. Physicians, nurses, and a hospital CEO testified that long-term radiation exposure and heavy lead aprons have caused cancer, cataracts, and orthopedic injuries, and that commercially available systems can reduce exposure to near zero. Some members raised questions about cost, vendor involvement, FDA clearance, and whether the bills should be discussed with stakeholders; the Health Systems Alliance of Arizona said it was neutral and wanted further stakeholder meetings. All three bills were adopted by 7-0 votes, with SB 1120 and SB 1121 amended. The committee then heard SB 1001, which would appropriate $1 million to the Department of Economic Security for the Older Individuals Who Are Blind program. Blind and low-vision speakers described long waitlists, the need for independent living training, and how services help seniors remain at home rather than enter more costly care. The bill passed 6-0 with one member not voting. Next, SB 1072 proposed ongoing General Fund and Medicaid spending to raise reimbursement rates for home- and community-based services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, plus room-and-board funding and a workforce survey/reporting requirement. Providers testified that the system is underfunded, staff turnover is high, overtime is extensive, and many people wait for services; the bill passed 6-0 with one not voting. The committee also approved SB 1125, requiring the Department of Child Safety to annually seek MOUs with tribes and improve tribal access to information about placements and enforcement actions involving licensed group homes, after members asked about the stakeholder process and tribal participation. SB 1123, which removes the requirement that a supervising forensic pathologist be board-certified before delegating autopsy-related tasks to trainees, passed after Maricopa County said the change would help address training delays and workforce shortages. SB 1052, allowing mild hyperbaric oxygen therapy in assisted living facilities under specified safeguards, drew support from the sponsor and an assisted-living operator but also opposition from a member concerned about off-label treatment in nonmedical settings; it passed 5-2. Finally, SB 1112, reducing the number of acquaintance witnesses required in court-ordered treatment proceedings from two to one and allowing a judge to waive the witness requirement in some cases, passed 5-2 after testimony from supporters who said the current rule often blocks treatment for seriously mentally ill people and from opponents who argued it weakens due process. The committee then began SB 1113, which would allow service of court-ordered evaluation and treatment documents by evaluation-agency employees or other court-authorized persons, but the transcript cuts off before action on that bill.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • This would legislative budget hearings.
  • So, there'll have to be a process for how that's done.
  • So, there'll have to be a process for how that's done.
  • So, there'll have to be a process for how that's done.
  • So, there'll have to be a process for how that's done.
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I appreciate you hearing the bill.
  • Thank you, Chair, and with that, we will close the hearing on SB 226 and open the hearing on Senate Bill
  • And with that, we will close the hearing on SB 442. We will now open the hearing on SB 74.
  • of State is the one who processes those electronic ballots.
  • Our goal is to build efficiencies into the process.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 22nd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hearing none, the substitute is adopted.
  • Chair, hearing none, the substitute is adopted. And so Mr.
  • Hearing none, the substitute's adopted.
  • Hearing none, the substitute's adopted.
  • Hearing none, the motion prevails, and the committee will. Stand in recess. Super.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 22nd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • But we try to keep the hearing moving.
  • How does this process work?
  • This wasn't a trial, it was a hearing.
  • determinations throughout this process.
  • We do have to have a hearing to determine...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • exactly does that, starts that process, and why would that happen?
  • It does go through the SOA process, so it does go through hearing and stuff where even at that point
  • Hearing none, Chair recognizes Representative Guillen to close. I close.
  • The Chair hears none. We'll leave this bill pending. Thank you.
  • Hearing none, the bill is left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, thank you for turning the air conditioning on in the hearing room.
  • Would any of you like to hear from them? All right?
  • . process of getting funding.
  • We're in the process of doing that.
  • Hearing none, the motion prevails.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Without hearing none, so ordered.
  • The chair hearing none, the motion is adopted. Senator.
  • Hearing none, it is so ordered. Thank you, Senator.
  • Before we begin hearing Senate as we are going to hear from our invited witness, PUC Chairman Thomas
  • We'll hear. Strive for the best. We'll find out at the hearing. Thank you. Okay, Senator Nichols.
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • , and we look forward to continuing to be a part of that process.
  • Is part of this SB6 process? I think so. Okay. Yes.
  • Hearing, Mr.
  • Again, I hear what y'all are saying about the for-profit, and is there a bidding process that gives the
  • So, I hear what you're saying.
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And then after we hear each of your testimony, then we'll open up the panel for questions to each one
  • Regardless of your position, we want to hear from you. Your voices matter.
  • Four are against, Senate Bill 18, hearing none, public testimony is closed.
  • We had a hearing that was scheduled for about 9 a.m. on a Tuesday morning, whatever.
  • Seeing and hearing none, public.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • For the benefit of those watching or hearing, may not be familiar with the process there are He's taking
  • And we will be hearing a public testimony after Mr.
  • Why not do simple majority for this process as well?
  • Seeing and hearing none. Open testimony is closed.
  • Seeing and hearing none.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Solar, can you hear me?
  • We just happened to see this bill come through as it's moving through the hearing process.
  • We can hear you.
  • and commissions process. Yes. and commissions process. Yes.
  • everybody else's process? everybody else's process?
Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 19, 2026, and the chair opened by emphasizing strict time limits and that all bills would be deferred if the agenda was not completed before the noon session. The first major measure discussed was HB 1739 HD1, which would preempt county land-use authority in transit-oriented development areas. The Department of Planning supported the bill, saying it could promote state-funded TOD and infrastructure, while the city and county’s position was raised in questioning. Unite Here Local 5 opposed the bill, arguing it would strip counties of self-determination, disrupt state-county policy collaboration, and remove a check on unrestrained development. Committee members pressed the supporters on whether the bill was really about higher density and whether it would override local zoning and sustainability concerns. The committee then heard testimony on HB 1741 HD1, a housing bill described by supporters as reducing inclusionary housing mandates and increasing supply. Grassroots Institute of Hawaii argued affordability mandates reduce overall housing production and raise market-rate prices, while a Zoom testifier said the bill would improve housing stability, health, and community outcomes for working families, kupuna, and young residents. Members asked about the bill’s needs assessment and who would conduct it, with a witness saying the counties would likely contract it out but that the bill did not clearly specify the reviewer. HB 2668 HD1, dealing with water heating systems, drew testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office and industry representatives. Supporters generally backed adding heat pumps to the law, but one solar-water-heater industry witness asked for amendments to remove or extend the current 15-year statutory life limit for solar water heaters and to update outdated standards and variance rules. A Kauaʻi Climate Action Coalition witness opposed the existing solar-only structure, arguing heat pump water heaters are cheaper, align with climate goals, and should be allowed without a variance. The Energy Office said the current law already allows variances in some cases, suggested adding high-efficiency heat pump water heaters to the exemption, and said the 15-year figure may be too short, with 18 years mentioned as a possible alternative. The committee also briefly moved through several other bills, including HB 2606 HD1 on off-site construction and HB 2362 HD1 on housing, with no notable testimony or action recorded in the excerpt.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/23/2026 - Senate Federalism and Family Law

Federalism and Family Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first bill that we're going to hear is 2793. The last one that we'll be hearing is 2144.
  • Chairman, for hearing it this afternoon and for hearing it first this afternoon.
  • Can you hear? Really, it's not working? Yeah, good.
  • And quite frankly, hearing from two different attorneys telling me that, And quite frankly, hearing from
  • Like you can hear it.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2793, which would let cities and towns expedite annexations when 100% of the property owners request it, waive the 30-day waiting period and public hearing in those cases, and allow electronic newspaper notice and a single on-site posting for small single-parcel annexations. Buckeye testified in support, saying the bill would streamline uncontested annexations and reduce delay and cost, while a Tucson-area senator raised concerns that faster annexation can limit public awareness and input. The bill passed 4-3 for a due pass recommendation. HB 2041, which would prohibit a parent, guardian, or custodian from being treated as abusing or neglecting a child solely because poverty prevents them from providing supervision, clothing, food, shelter, or medical care, drew strong support from child welfare and anti-poverty advocates. Opponents argued the bill still leaves room for investigations based on poverty and should more fully remove poverty from the neglect definition. The committee also heard HB 2239, creating a child care grant program and infrastructure fund at DES; witnesses from northern Arizona and child care providers described shortages, workforce challenges, and the need for facilities and support. An amendment adding tax-credit language and opening eligibility to entities seeking to open child care facilities was adopted, and the amended bill passed 6-0 with one not voting. The committee then approved HB 2321, requiring DCS to place a credit freeze on a child’s credit report when the child enters care, by a 7-0 vote. HB 2371, allowing consenting divorcing parties without minor children to use AI-assisted arbitration and adding a separate amendment on therapeutic interventions in parenting cases, prompted questions about whether AI arbitration is currently used and whether the amendment was germane; it passed 4-3. HB 2594, concerning the Address Confidentiality Program in family court and making attempts to obtain protected address information a felony, passed unanimously after testimony from a survivor and advocates. HB 2661, which requires DCS to inform parents under investigation that they may delegate temporary guardianship and seek court relief, passed 4-3 after amendment removed attestation and documentation requirements. Finally, HB 2995, a major domestic-violence custody bill, was heard with extensive testimony from survivors, attorneys, and legal aid advocates. The bill removes the “significant” domestic violence threshold, adds coercive control to the analysis, requires domestic violence to be treated as contrary to the child’s best interests, and mandates detailed court findings; supporters said it addresses cases where abuse was minimized in custody decisions, while members raised concerns about evidentiary standards, implementation, and the risk of false allegations. The committee adopted a 13-page amendment and then gave the amended bill a due pass recommendation by a 4-3 vote.