Video & Transcript : 'DFPS budget' :
Page 472 of 500
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Human Services Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:00 am
Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- We know that the governor's budget included a set of interventions to help prevent critical incidents
- I'll just highlight a few of those items here that the governor included in his budget: helping us with
- I would be very remiss if I did not note that Governor Ferguson's proposed supplemental budget would
- What you'll probably notice is most of them were budget items and budget provisos and things that, as
Committee:
Senate Human Services
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Local Government Jan 28th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- You will all recall that in the 2025 legislative session and the budget section for the Office of Lieutenant
- You will all recall that in the 2025 legislative session and the budget section for the office of lieutenant
- government. 2025 legislative session and the budget section for the Office of the Lieutenant Governor
- I would like to note there is not a significant fiscal impact on the state budget, and with that, we
- I would like to note there is not a significant fiscal impact on the state budget, and with that, we
Summary:
The committee held public hearings on several local government bills, with most of the discussion focused on HB 2480, which would require cities and counties planning under the Growth Management Act to allow residential uses in commercial and mixed-use zones and limit local requirements for ground-floor retail or mixed-use conditions. The bill sponsor and supporters, including the Lieutenant Governor, Governor’s Office, Commerce, builders, business groups, and housing advocates, argued it would unlock underused commercial land, reduce housing costs, and help address Washington’s housing shortage. Opponents and some cities said the bill could undermine local planning, walkable mixed-use centers, tax base, and neighborhood retail, and asked for more exemptions or narrower application. Several speakers supported the proposed substitute as a compromise, while others urged not to weaken the bill further. No vote was taken.
The committee also heard HB 2223, which would create an exception to the conflict-of-interest rules for irrigation district directors whose spouses work for a district contract, modeled on an existing exception for public hospital district commissioners. The sponsor and the Washington State Water Resources Association said the change would help irrigation districts recruit and retain volunteer board members in rural areas while preserving disclosure and recusal requirements. The hearing was brief and no action was taken.
HB 2530 would extend the deadline for forming a public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities from July 1, 2026, to July 1, 2028. Supporters from Olympia and Tumwater said the extension would give local governments more time to collaborate and pursue an aquatic center that has long been a community priority; one testifier said removing the deadline entirely would also be acceptable. The committee then heard HB 2459, which would expand authority to site certain schools outside urban growth areas and extend utilities to serve them. Supporters, especially representatives of the Tahoma School District and related groups, said the bill would let districts use land they already own to relieve overcrowding. Opponents, including Futurewise, argued it would weaken Growth Management Act planning and local multicounty policies and should remain a local process. Finally, HB 2129 on agritourism was briefly heard, with the sponsor describing it as a way to help farms stay viable and preserve rural character; the committee heard supportive comments about farm preservation and openness to a work group or amendments. No votes or final actions were taken on these bills during the hearing.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- It's also a win for the state budget because, despite declines in consumption, the new tax rate will
- I also want to flag the broader fiscal context: the Legislature just closed a $16 billion budget gap
- As we work to stabilize the budget, we urge caution with policies that may reduce state revenue.
- FPHS faces an overall 38% reduction driven by the governor's proposed budget and changes to vapor product
- You know, right now, many of us are living on a hamburger helper budget, and this could not be a worse
Committee:
Senate Ways & Means
Keywords:
SB 6073, LEOFF, Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System, retirement system, pension, public safety retirement, wildland firefighter, aviation firefighter, wildland fire, forest firefighter, Department of Natural Resources, DNR, firefighter benefits, retirement benefits, service credit, disability retirement, survivor benefits, employer contributions, Washington RCW, public employees
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans Jan 21st, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- The ROB oversees the funds, programming, approves the budget and expenditures, provides an annual report
- So the solution here, you know, in our great, in our budget crisis, we are not So the solution here,
- you know, in our great budget crisis, we are not going to be able to fund tourism promotion like our
- People will stop shopping at those stores, and that lack of spending will affect store revenue, labor budgets
- difference between the cheapest and most expensive baskets could have a big impact on household food budgets
Summary:
The committee first heard House Bill 2325, which would create a tourism self-supported assessment program to fund statewide tourism promotion. Staff explained that the bill would let the Washington Tourism Marketing Authority develop and administer an assessment program overseen by a 10-member ratepayer board, subject to a referendum of affected businesses, and would add a public records exemption for business financial and commercial information. The prime sponsor and supporters from State of Washington Tourism, the hospitality industry, the Port of Seattle, breweries, and wine interests argued that Washington is underinvesting in tourism compared with other states and that an industry-led assessment would provide sustainable, competitive funding. Opposition testimony from a taxpayer group objected to new assessments and unelected authority over tax-like charges. No vote was taken on the bill in the hearing.
The committee then heard House Bill 2481, which would prohibit surveillance-based price discrimination and surge pricing for certain retail goods, require clear price posting, and temporarily bar electronic shelf labels in larger grocery stores while Commerce studies their effects. The sponsor said the bill is intended to ensure that customers in the same store pay the same price and to prevent AI-driven pricing based on personal data. Labor, privacy, and consumer advocates supported the bill, citing concerns about hidden price discrimination, worker stress, and consumer harm. Grocery and retail groups, along with an ESL manufacturer and a tech association, opposed the bill as written, warning that the definitions were too broad and could interfere with loyalty programs, discounts, inventory management, and electronic shelf label systems; several said they were working with the sponsor on amendments. The chair indicated amendments were expected and asked stakeholders to submit language soon, but no vote occurred.
Finally, the committee opened House Bill 2503, which would require developers of generative AI systems to post high-level documentation about training data before public release and make violations a Consumer Protection Act issue. The sponsor described the bill as a transparency measure meant to function like an ingredients label for AI, helping consumers, researchers, and creators understand what goes into a model. Supporters from TechNet and Chamber of Progress said they generally backed the concept but wanted the bill aligned more closely with California’s recent law, especially on enforcement and the private right of action. Members raised questions about trade secrets, applicability to large versus small developers, and whether the bill could affect medical or other specialized AI uses; the sponsor said amendments were anticipated and that the bill was still early in the process. The hearing on HB 2503 then moved to public testimony.
UT
Utah 2025 Regular Session
Economic Development and Workforce Services Interim Committee - November 19, 2025
Economic Development and Workforce Services Interim Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Second, we start working with those communities to draft what are called project area plans and budgets
- Sure, we threw in a slide of our budget. This is in our annual report.
- Our budget last year was about $62.5 million.
- I'm happy to answer questions at the end if you have any budget questions. ...credits.
- Happy to answer questions at the end if you have any budget questions.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Education Study Oct 15th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Funds used for statewide online financial reporting: how will you coordinate that with PED's budgeting
- Because somehow we didn't cross-reference our budgeting processes correctly, or the numbers didn't align
- I appreciate that, and I hope as we're looking at budget that...
- And so looking at a way that we can, and you will see in our budget request that we are looking for a
- Given that fiscal year 27 budget proposal, are relatively flat or reduced in funding.
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Housing Sep 16th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- And so that is their budget to go shopping with, and that's what I tell them.
- So they could do maybe 10,000... ...that is their budget to go shopping with.
- We had heard a lot on the capital budget team about the amount that can be allocated for CHIP, and I'm
- One of the things that I will point out is lenders typically dictate specific requirements for budgets
- Lenders typically dictate specific requirements for budgets, reserves, and financial management.
Summary:
The Senate Housing Committee heard presentations on a range of housing finance, permitting, and affordability tools. Chattanooga described its affordable housing PILOT program, which uses a per-unit property tax abatement tied to the rent loss from providing affordable units, with a 15-year term and annual compliance monitoring. Committee members asked about the program’s structure, whether it had been used elsewhere, and who was participating; the presenter said the first mixed-income project would bring 278 units with 42 affordable units and that the model was attracting private market-rate developers. Shoreline then described its MFTE and inclusionary zoning approach, emphasizing that longer tax exemption periods and station-area zoning changes had helped spur development, with most current pipeline projects concentrated near light rail stations.
The committee also heard from the Municipal Research Services Center and the Department of Commerce on tax increment financing, proportional impact fees, and permit timelines. Commerce explained that TIF can fund public improvements such as roads, utilities, broadband, and some affordable housing or child care facilities, while proportional impact fee guidance is intended to help jurisdictions charge fees more closely aligned with actual project impacts. On permit timelines, Commerce presented its first annual report under recent law changes, using 2024 as a baseline year and noting that reported timelines were generally longer than statutory goals; members asked about outliers, paper versus electronic processing, and whether back-and-forth between applicants and staff was driving delays. Commerce said it would follow up with more data, including on CHIP funding and permit reform practices.
Several local governments then shared permitting process improvements. Auburn reported relatively short review cycles and described its move to fully electronic permitting, internal performance standards, and a stock plan program that speeds review for repeated home designs. Bellevue described an AI permitting pilot with a local startup to help with pre-application questions, document triage, and plan review, aiming to reduce incomplete applications and revision cycles. Seattle presented a pilot for accessory dwelling unit co-development in which a mission-driven partner would help homeowners split lots, finance, build, and manage ADUs, with the homeowner eventually buying out the partner and retaining ownership; committee members asked about rent setting, management fees, and default risk, and staff said they would follow up. The committee also heard brief overviews of community land trusts and limited equity cooperatives as permanent affordability models, with presenters urging continued state and local funding support and policy recognition for these approaches.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Land Grant Sep 8th, 2025
House Rural Development, Land Grants And Cultural Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- year, one of the requirements before you can get your appropriation is that you have to fill out a budget
- Audit and budget: the annual revenue thresholds for distribution are as follows: less than $50,000 equals
- Compliance with the current budget submitted. to the Budget and Finance Bureau within LGD, which is the
- That is something that, and I think it would be germane to this session because it affects the budget
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Finance Aug 19th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- I look at the needs for your preliminary outlooks on your budget, as well as what you're looking to invest
- It’s worth mentioning that the President of Mexico has authorized the budget to carry out these projects
- In terms of the budget time frames where some of the investments that you talked about are continuing
- And I ask because for this committee, we will go into a budget session starting in January, where we're
- I will be very interested to see moving forward if there are additional budget requests.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Aug 14th, 2025
Revenue Stabilization & Tax Policy Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Right, and you can, the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation at the federal
- Right now, we're operating with a $1.3 billion budget, and because our funding spans from one fiscal
- Slide four: our budget is at a glance, pretty simple, in that it comes pretty much 50-50 from our state
- This is just a summary of our $1.3 billion budget on page five.
- One of the discussion points over the course of this session, when the budget is being developed... is
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Aug 12th, 2025
New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- portfolio includes access to their demand learning platform, Initiate, which covers money management and budgeting
- But they may be buried somewhere in the budget, so that could be something. So that's number one.
- Sustainability, as evidenced by an operating budget and a future projected sustainable operating budget
- one, and I understand there are so many venues here, but we have made huge investments through our budget
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Judiciary Committee Jun 17th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Despite these policy and budget efforts, our housing supply is still woefully inadequate to meet the
- And to my colleagues, ...comments about the court delays, also in I think in the current budget, someone
- Judicial Council's recommendation for additional manpower and courtrooms has been denied in the current budget
- Because I also recognize that during tough budget times, it's easy to say no to the Judicial Council
- It's just how do we do it in the budget environment?
Summary:
The committee heard several bills focused on civil rights, family law, privacy, housing, and artificial intelligence. SB 477 would clarify FEHA procedures for the Civil Rights Department, including tolling deadlines by agreement and updating complaint definitions; it drew some concern about venue and convenience but was moved forward. SB 450 would confirm California jurisdiction over adoption proceedings for children born in the state even if families have moved away, and would require all legal parents to be listed on adoption orders; it received strong support, especially from LGBTQ family advocates, and passed to Appropriations. SB 683 would clarify that people whose name, image, or likeness is misused may seek TROs or injunctions under existing publicity-rights law; opposition from media and First Amendment groups focused on the 48-hour compliance default and speech concerns, but the bill advanced as amended to Privacy and Consumer Protection.
The committee also considered SB 11, the AI Abuse Protection Act, which would regulate voice, image, and video cloning technology, require warnings, and direct the Judicial Council to develop evidence standards for AI; it passed to Public Safety. SCR 66, a resolution designating May 1 as Law Day and emphasizing the rule of law, was adopted unanimously after supportive comments from members. SB 808 would create expedited judicial review for housing permit denials that violate state law; supporters said it would reduce costly delay and help housing production, while the Judicial Council opposed it as imposing unreasonable timelines and staffing burdens. The bill passed to Appropriations despite concerns about court resources and broader housing-law issues.
The committee then took up two privacy bills from Senator Wiener. SB 59 would automatically keep confidential court records for adult and retroactive gender/name change petitions, expanding protections previously enacted for minors; supporters described real-world doxxing and harassment, while opponents raised First Amendment and public-records objections, and the bill passed to Appropriations. SB 497 would require warrants for out-of-state law enforcement access to California prescription monitoring data, expand transgender shield protections for gender-affirming care records, and bar certain disclosures without legal process; the author framed it as a response to out-of-state anti-trans enforcement, and the bill was presented with support from trans advocacy groups.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session May 29th, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- life and death situation and it begins here at home by protecting the most vulnerable. only in our budget
- We are not debating the budget right now. There is room for everyone.
- teach. as a legislator who knows that we are seeing right now from the federal government a hateful budget
- I'm proud to be a co-author, happy to see this included in the budget this year.
- So they're not the first on the chopping block whenever we're in a budget crisis.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- time is money, delays can mess up your financing, can cause commodity cost to increase beyond your budget
- time is money, delays, can mess up your financing, can cause commodity cost to increase beyond your budget
- So I get all of that. and you're thinking. commodity cost to increase beyond your budget, and so I get
- There's no new bodies to issue those permits, and so, you know, subtle plug for the agency's budget request
- So that is 48% of our general fund budget. So without that, we couldn't function.
Committee:
House Environmental Regulation
Summary:
The committee first heard House Bill 1904, which would classify intentionally released helium balloons as litter and create criminal penalties for balloon releases. The author and supportive witnesses argued that balloon releases harm wildlife, livestock, waterways, and infrastructure, and that the bill would close a loophole in current litter law. Several members questioned whether criminal penalties were appropriate, and the author said he was willing to work toward civil penalties and fines instead. No vote was taken, and HB 1904 was left pending.
The committee then took up several pending bills and reported them favorably to the full House, including HB 3249, HB 3866, HB 4112, HB 1768, HB 1499, HB 573, and HB 464. These measures dealt with topics such as TCEQ contested-case procedures, outdoor storage containers, high-level radioactive waste, concrete plant permitting and grants, unannounced concrete batch plant inspections, and a scrap tire grant program. Most were adopted with substitutes and passed on recorded votes, generally with unanimous or near-unanimous support.
A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 3997, which would create expedited permitting timelines for LNG facilities and related wastewater permits. Industry witnesses said the bill would provide certainty for multibillion-dollar projects without eliminating public participation, while environmental groups opposed parts of the bill that they said could limit contested-case participation and be unrealistic for SOAH timelines. TCEQ staff described the current wastewater permitting process and said some of the bill’s timing provisions could be workable, especially with an expedited fee. The bill was left pending after the author said he would continue working on committee substitute language.
The committee also heard HB 1237 on extending the renewal window for expired TCEQ occupational water licenses, and HB 4519, a TERP consolidation bill that would combine several clean transportation grant programs into fewer programs. HB 1237 was left pending without testimony, while HB 4519 drew broad support from environmental and industry witnesses who favored simplifying the program, though some asked for stronger emphasis on particulate matter and hydrogen funding. The committee withdrew the substitute on HB 4519 and left it pending. Finally, HB 5033, which would eliminate the motor vehicle emissions inspection and maintenance program if federal authority changes, drew opposition from environmental and inspection-industry witnesses who warned it would weaken air-quality protections and could remove an important enforcement tool. The author said the bill was intended as a trigger mechanism and would be refined, and HB 5033 was left pending. The committee also heard HB 1227 on municipal solid-waste franchise fees and private-provider access; the author said he would bring a substitute after hearing concerns from cities, and the bill was left pending.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Health Committee Apr 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- question that you all are probably thinking about, which is we're asking for money at a time of tight budgets
- when we are facing Medicaid cuts, and it is exactly... ...of tight budgets when we are facing Medicaid
- While I recognize the potential state cost, I've submitted an accompanying budget ask and want to emphasize
- that these supportive housing services I've submitted an accompanying budget ask and want to emphasize
- In the health budget subcommittee yesterday, we heard about the emergency rental assistance under Medi-Cal
Summary:
The Assembly Health Committee met on April 8 and heard a long series of bills, beginning with AB 54 on medication abortion access. The author and supporters, including the Attorney General’s office and reproductive justice advocates, said the bill would protect California’s medication abortion supply chain and shield providers and manufacturers from civil, criminal, and professional liability. Opponents from the California Family Council argued the bill removes safeguards and increases risks. The bill was moved forward on a committee motion.
The committee then heard several reproductive and public health measures, including AB 551 to create a pilot program supporting emergency departments in providing reproductive health services, AB 260 to protect medication abortion access and telehealth, AB 309 to remove sunset dates on laws allowing pharmacy syringe sales and lawful possession of sterile syringes, AB 536 to preserve colorectal cancer screening coverage if federal guidelines are challenged, AB 804 to make housing support services a Medi-Cal benefit, AB 594 to address student health insurance billing and transparency, AB 836 to study and expand the midwifery workforce, AB 1418 to collect data on health coverage for eligible employees, and AB 1500 to maintain and expand the abortion.ca.gov information site. Supporters emphasized access, preventive care, workforce shortages, and public health benefits, while opponents raised concerns about abortion, syringe distribution, and the focus of state resources. Most measures were advanced by committee vote, with roll calls showing broad support and a few no votes from members on some bills.
The final bill discussed in the transcript was AB 1037, which would update substance use disorder laws to reflect evidence-based, harm-reduction approaches and remove barriers to treatment. The author and supporters described it as a compassionate response to overdose and treatment access problems, while law enforcement opposition argued it would encourage drug use and endanger communities. The transcript cuts off during testimony on AB 1037, so no final committee action on that bill is shown in the provided text.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee Apr 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- as a result of this race to the bottom, is on a path to take over one-fourth of the global carbon budget
- And roughly Californians spend three to five percent of their budget, according to the Bureau of Labor
- So we know we have the budget chair's support for help with the funding.
- the health of our population, in the health of our children, and also in the health of our state budget
- to fund this kind of infrastructure, and we'll continue to work together on it because we've got a budget
Summary:
The committee heard several environmental and consumer-safety bills. AB 405, the Fashion Act, would require fashion companies to disclose and manage toxic chemicals in their supply chains; supporters said it would reduce worker and consumer exposure and align with existing industry frameworks, while retailers and business groups argued it would duplicate existing laws and raise costs. After questions about DTSC workload, international standards, and affordability, the bill was moved on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Natural Resources and held on call with three votes. AB 762 would ban the sale and distribution of disposable vape devices; supporters emphasized battery-fire risks, recycling contamination, and waste impacts, while cannabis and convenience-store interests warned it would push consumers to illicit markets and harm legal businesses. The bill passed on a due-pass motion to Business and Professions with three votes and was held on call.
The committee also adopted the consent calendar with six votes. AB 794 would direct California to keep in place the federal PFAS drinking-water standard if federal protections are weakened, with supporters citing health risks and the need for certainty, and water agencies opposing the emergency-rulemaking authority and potential costs. Members debated whether the bill was too broad and whether federal funds would cover implementation; the bill passed on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Appropriations with four votes and was held open. AB 1148, the Safer Food Packaging Act, would restrict certain chemicals in food packaging; supporters cited cancer and reproductive-health concerns, while chemical, beverage, and manufacturing groups argued the bill should go through existing regulatory processes and that some chemicals lacked feasible alternatives. The author said she would remove antimony trioxide later in the process after hearing opposition concerns; the bill passed on a due-pass motion to Judiciary with four votes and was held open.
Finally, AB 1338 would allow local air districts to recover costs for implementing fence-line air monitoring at metal shredding facilities, building on prior legislation and local air district efforts in AB 617 communities. The author said the bill would preserve local control and improve efficiency, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District testified in support. The transcript ends as the district witness begins testimony, with no vote yet taken on AB 1338.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Rules Apr 1st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- I think it's currently budgeted at 1 million dollars and it's for the planning design and engineering
- just when when my church has been I to be involved with Florida memorial, most of my life, it's a budget
- let me please tell you from personal experience that occurred to me last week when I address the budget
- hallway outside the meeting room to Florida Highway Patrol meant were present that day to support their budget
- Last week I address the budget and Appropriations and Tourism Committee.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- the disposition of approximately 90 million in general revenue and another $73 million in federal budget
- For fiscal years 2025, the agency's indirect administrative rate is budgeted at 1.5%.
- Direct administration of agency programs is budgeted at another 10%. 88.5% of all appropriated funds
- appropriations. um, uh, and that completes the agency's prepared marks on its current program activities and budget
- And that's why 90% of our annual budget supports personnel costs for professional educators and staff
Bills:
HB294
Committee:
House Agriculture & Livestock
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That means that my budget is larger than the budget of about 36 governors, but food nutrition is by far
- States should continue funding programs and support TDA's budget that helps growers combat HLB, fruit
- Uh, TVMA is seeking a rider for the higher education coordinating budget to conduct an updated study
- fires, hurricanes, and other natural disasters across the state for several years, despite having no budget
Committee:
House Agriculture & Livestock
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Press Conference: Outlining the Impact of Eliminating the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Feb 21st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- for the CFPB, deleted it, and installed themselves as the director of the Office of Management and Budget
- at some point in the Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee, we will be seeing the governor's budget
- the</c> committee we will be seeing the committee we will be seeing the governor's<00:21:39.880><c> budget
- </c><00:21:40.200><c> for</c><00:21:40.440><c> Commerce</c><00:21:40.760><c> and</c> governor's budget
- for Commerce and governor's budget for Commerce and consumer<00:21:41.279><c> protection</c><00:21:41.640