Video & Transcript Research : 'audit procedures'

Page 46 of 479
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Two Commission procedural rules sought to harmonize that requirement with other laws that, one, require
  • It saves filers the trouble of a potential future audit or a potential future complaint.
  • We're making sure our audit, our... ...working on.
  • Last proposed amendments to our rules relate to sworn complaint procedures, including default orders,
  • These discovery control plans are mirrored after the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Summary: The Texas Ethics Commission met on March 11, 2025, first in executive session and then in open session. The chair announced that, in light of Texas Attorney General Opinion KP-484, the commission would conform its practices to the opinion and move to repeal tolling rules for sworn-complaint deadlines. The chair also said the commission would dismiss 36 pending sworn-complaint cases in which the 120-day settlement deadline had been exceeded, even though the delay had been tolled under prior TEC rules. The commission then set future meeting dates for June 12 and September 17 and approved prior meeting minutes. The commission adopted a new criminal-referral rule clarifying that, once jurisdiction over a complaint is accepted, commissioners may vote to make a criminal referral. It also adopted revised advisory-opinion rules, with a clarifying amendment from a commenter, and republished proposed changes to the definition of “principal purpose” for political committees after staff recommended a 49 percent political-activity threshold and further public input. The commission published for comment proposed changes to ethics training rules, facial-compliance review procedures, late-filing waiver and reduction rules, and sworn-complaint procedures, including tighter discovery limits, a default-order set-aside process, and removal of tolling language inconsistent with KP-484. It also republished Chapter 28 rules on Speaker-candidate reporting. The commission adopted several advisory opinions. It declined to give an affirmative defense on whether certain school-district communications were political advertising because related litigation had already addressed the issue. It reaffirmed that a House member may use donated district-office space if it is not reimbursable with public funds and was accepted before the contribution moratorium. It also concluded that a judge may use political funds for travel to a Navy-hosted event as a local dignitary, that legislators’ use of a corporate aircraft for a border-region fact-finding trip could be permissible but would likely trigger reporting obligations, that a TCEQ commissioner’s revolving-door restrictions apply only to matters actually placed before the commissioner, and that a part-time legislative staffer may not take outside employment assisting a registered lobbyist. The commission then heard and acted on numerous fine-waiver appeals, granting several full waivers or reductions and approving staff recommendations on others, and terminated a number of inactive campaign treasurer appointments. Finally, the executive director briefed the commission on the 2025 legislative session, noting that staffing requests are tied to Sunset recommendations and that the House had preliminarily recommended about half of the commission’s appropriations requests.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There's no oversight, and there's no state audit of this.
  • Now, you have taken a look at the audits, supposedly detailed audits, which I strongly disagree with.
  • The state audits shall promptly investigate a report.
  • That's why there have to be state audits.
  • So, based on the certified financial audits, the current...
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 1/16/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • and identify underpayments, MinnesotaCare audits and investigations, Child Care Grant audits, CCAP child
  • audits.
  • and identify underpayments, MinnesotaCare audits and investigations, Child Care Grant audits, CCAP child
  • underpayments um Minnesota care Audits underpayments um Minnesota care Audits and and and investigations
  • <01:11:53.040> uh um conduct postp payment audits uh um conduct postp payment audits uh provider
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee met for an introductory overview of its jurisdiction and staff roles. Nonpartisan House Research and House Fiscal staff explained that they draft bills and amendments, prepare bill summaries and background research, answer legal and fiscal questions, and help track revenue and budget effects. They also distributed a Budget Overview Brief intended to condense the larger budget materials into a more usable format for members. Staff then walked through the Human Services budget and the committee’s areas of responsibility. They described the department structure, noting that DHS oversees administration, compliance, rulemaking, and county support, and that the overall Human Services budget is large, with medical assistance as the dominant program. They also explained recent and upcoming reorganizations: many children and family-related functions are moving to the new Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Direct Care and Treatment is becoming its own agency, and some homelessness-related functions remain at DHS. Staff reviewed how the budget is organized by program and budget activity, the difference between direct appropriations and standing appropriations, and how forecasted programs and “tails” work in the budget process. The presentation also covered Medicaid financing and long-term care. Staff explained the federal-state FMAP match, including Minnesota’s current 51.16% federal match for most Medicaid spending, the CHIP match, and the 90% federal share for the expansion population. For long-term care, they outlined Medical Assistance services for elderly and disabled people, state-funded long-term care supports, and Board on Aging programs. They highlighted the personal care assistance program’s phaseout and replacement by Community First Services and Supports, and reviewed the five home- and community-based waivers. Members asked one question about refugee resettlement funding, specifically whether it covers flights; staff said they would need to follow up on the exact use of the federal funds. No bills were heard, and no formal votes or other committee actions were taken during this meeting.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2026-04-07

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • different sections, the financial audit different sections, the financial audit uh<00:02:43.360>
  • uh we have [snorts] our financial audit uh we have [snorts] our financial audit division<00:10:18.520
  • <00:20:49.600> are, and policies and procedures are, and policies and procedures are, so<00
  • How are the audits funded?
  • And the How are the audits funded?
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/4/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 10 relates to our procedures for reviewing the operations and maintenance expenses from each
  • Section 10 relates to our procedures for reviewing the operations and maintenance expenses from each
  • Section 10 relates to our procedures for reviewing the operations and maintenance expenses from each
  • Section 10 relates to our procedures for reviewing the operations and maintenance expenses from each
  • Section 10 relates to our procedures for reviewing the operations and maintenance expenses from each
Summary: The committee met on March 4, 2026, and first approved the minutes from March 2 by voice vote. It then took up several Metropolitan Council agency bills, with members repeatedly moving to lay them over for possible inclusion or, in one case, to re-refer a bill to another committee. The first three bills discussed were House File 3884, House File 3881, and House File 3882, all presented as administrative or programmatic changes intended to streamline Met Council processes. House File 3884 would allow tribal governments and tribal development entities to apply directly for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Act grants and community tree planting grants, rather than applying through a city or other local government. Testimony from Met Council staff said the bill would simplify access and align the Met Council’s tree-planting program with existing DNR authority. House File 3881 would expand the Met Council’s contracting authority to include small businesses more broadly, require an annual report to the legislature on small-business contracting, and repeal a duplicative statute on certificates of compliance. House File 3882 would make a range of administrative cleanups, including removing an obsolete housing-bond review role, clarifying outdated statutory language, extending the review cycle for metropolitan significance rules from every two years to every 10 years, clarifying reporting and Livable Communities Act provisions, changing regional parks operations-and-maintenance reimbursements to rely on audited financial statements, and clarifying agricultural preserves procedures. The committee also considered House File 3883, which was amended with an A1 amendment before adoption. That bill updates appointments to the Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee, known as MOSAC, including direct appointments for certain county representatives and adding a tribal representative appointed by the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council, while also cleaning up outdated language and eligibility provisions. A former MOSAC member spoke in support of the committee’s work, and the chair said the bill was common-sense and renewed the motion to lay it over as amended. Finally, the committee began House File 3363, a bill described by the author as a response to safety concerns after the June events, aimed at removing public access to legislators’ home addresses from Campaign Finance Board materials; discussion had just begun when the transcript ended.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Agencies acting on OLA recommendations 3/10/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, basically for many years I've been on a Legislative Audit Commission, where we see during the audits
  • And frankly, with all of the increased focus on audits, I talked with Ann Rest, who's the chair of the
  • Legislative Audit Commission, and said we need to have the auditor sit with the revisor and do a lot
  • Legislative Audit Commission, and said we need to have the auditor sit with the revisor and do a lot
  • audits what agencies aren't doing quite to standard or should be doing to do a better job.
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee heard House File 3672, authored by Representative Quam, and the bill was laid over. Quam said the measure is based on findings from past Legislative Audit Commission audits and is intended to clarify state requirements, strengthen agency compliance, and address gaps such as conflicts of interest in grant administration. He said he wants the auditor to work directly with the revisor and agencies so the rules are clearer and less likely to be misunderstood. Betsy Hayes, Assistant Commissioner with the Department of Administration, testified that sections 5 through 11 of the bill would strengthen grants management authorities, reporting, monitoring, training, and conflict-of-interest limits, and said those changes are generally supported and in some cases already reflected in policy. She raised concern about section 3, saying it could sweep too broadly by applying chapter 16B grants-management requirements to all state payments to non-state entities, including procurement payments, which could create fiscal impact and regulatory overlap. She said the department is working with the author, the Office of the Legislative Auditor, and Auditor Randall to refine the language. Chair Clayburn asked for clarification on the difference between grants and procurement contracts and on the relationship between chapters 16B and 16C. Hayes explained that grants are typically reimbursement-based payments to third parties under chapter 16B, while procurement contracts are inward-facing state purchases under chapter 16C. She said section 3 could unintentionally capture procurement and apply grants rules to it. Clayburn said the bill’s intent is good and welcomed continued work on the language before the bill moves forward.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/8/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<00:14:07.360> grant<00:14:07.920> grantee policies and procedures, grant grantee
  • What percentages of grants that you issue do you audit?
  • What percentages of grants that you issue do you audit? Commissioner: Mr.
  • The legislative audit commission report.
  • we reviewed, the legislative audit we reviewed, the legislative audit commission<00:54:04.400>
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection - 01/23/25

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • They have a very robust audit process on the funding and do a detailed report to the legislature.
  • , and then we have audits of our programs to make sure we’re adhering to those day in, day out.
  • <00:26:21.880> of procedures and then we have audits of procedures and then we have audits
  • And to your point about, you know, within following guidance and process and procedure, we want to be
  • And to your point about, you know, within following guidance and process and procedure, we want to be
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Juvenile Justice Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Juvenile Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • It procedurally reduces the youth population so staff can focus on rehabilitation, the thing that we
  • Audits on Cindy Wheelus: use of force are a good idea.
  • Turned off Cindy Wheelus: body cams should be audited and prescribed. That's a no go.
  • The audit that you're talking about was a facility audit. 65% of the staff that were audited did...
  • That was what was in the facility audit as mentioned in the DOJ report.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

89th Legislative Session Mar 24th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • over a child at risk of receiving certain prohibited gender-transitioning or gender-reassignment procedures
  • meeting with the state agency's internal auditor and deliver or receive information about certain auditing
  • HB 3508 by Wharton, relating to responsibility to review and audit a third-party administrator, referred
  • Barrer, relating to the registration of military family members at a polling place and related procedures
  • beverages at certain racing facilities, referred to the Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures
Summary: The House met briefly to read a large number of first-reading bills, joint resolutions, and concurrent resolutions and refer them to the appropriate committees. The measures covered a wide range of topics, including public health, education, criminal justice, taxation, transportation, water and natural resources, elections, housing, veterans issues, local government, and constitutional amendments. Several bills focused on school policy, health care regulation, property tax and sales tax changes, criminal penalties, and local or state agency authority. Among the notable items were proposals on name and sex changes on birth records, college admissions inquiries into criminal history, foster care contractor liability, school nutrition and assessment policy, election procedures, homestead and franchise tax exemptions, public retirement system reporting, and numerous transportation and infrastructure measures. The House also received resolutions designating local honors and observances, including Brownsville as the bicycling capital of the Rio Grande Valley, Port Aransas as the fishing capital of Texas, and Selena Quintanilla Perez Day. Some measures proposed constitutional amendments on legislative procedure, homestead taxation, and election-law enforcement authority. No debate or testimony occurred in this segment; the action was limited to first reading and referral. The session also referred several resolutions to the Local and Consent Calendars. At the end of the proceedings, the House adjourned without objection until 2 p.m. Tuesday.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Jun 29th, 2026

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • During that time, the audit has been languishing. My request has been languishing.
  • And then during that time, the audit has been languishing. My request has been languishing.
  • But I think we should do an audit and understand where the money has been appropriated.
  • You are recognized for your procedural motion. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • Members, this is a procedural vote. The clerk will open the roll.
Keywords: 988, house, all
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
  • 2228 requires timely status and outcome reports be submitted to the Attorney General and outlines procedures
  • 2228 requires timely status and outcome reports be submitted to the Attorney General and outlines procedures
  • House Bill 2206, SNAP error rate forensic audit, mandates that, on or before December 30, 2030, DES reduce
  • Madam Chair, member, HB 2532, homelessness data performance audit appropriation, requires the Auditor
  • General to conduct a one-time audit of monies disbursed toward homeless services and funds the audit
Keywords: 1182, all
Summary: The committee worked through a very long minority caucus calendar covering a wide range of bills, with many items being described and then either left on consent, pulled from consent, or noted for votes. Topics included bullion and state depository proposals, a produce incentive appropriation, a biennial budget change, veterans services funding, driver licensing and traffic enforcement measures, procurement and public records changes, school board and school facilities rules, SNAP work requirements and verification, child welfare and juvenile justice provisions, housing and homelessness measures, energy and fuel policy, election administration, and several tax, commerce, and licensing bills. Members repeatedly raised concerns about constitutionality, federal preemption, duplication of existing law, and whether some measures were policy priorities that had been vetoed in prior sessions and were returning unchanged. Several bills drew extended debate. Members objected to English-proficiency requirements for commercial drivers and motor carriers, arguing federal law and the supremacy clause would bar them. Earned wage access regulation prompted strong opposition over consumer harm, overdraft cycles, and high effective APRs. School-related bills were criticized for overregulating public schools while not imposing similar requirements on ESA/private-school programs, especially on fingerprint clearance and reporting. SNAP-related bills were also opposed as setting unrealistic mandates and repeating vetoed proposals. Other contested measures included a drag-show criminalization bill, a bill restricting photo enforcement, a bill limiting local regulation of unmanned aircraft, and a bill conforming Arizona tax law to federal changes, which members said would benefit wealthy taxpayers and corporations without a clear funding source. The committee also heard a number of supportive or less controversial measures, including bills on veterans awareness, dementia care telemonitoring, Braille transcription funding, CPA licensure pathways, cash acceptance by retailers, and some child safety and court administration changes. Several bills were pulled from consent for further discussion, while others were noted as having unanimous or near-unanimous votes. The meeting ended with caucus announcements, including an affordability award presentation, an upcoming Latino Caucus discussion on community land trusts, and an invitation to African American Legislative Day activities, followed by adjournment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is basically our procedural manual on how to deal with a complaint.
  • It has to go through all three procedures, all three groups.
  • Have there been procedural hearings in the last five years?
  • And the Attorney General to conduct audits and take enforcement action. So I could go on.
  • Moving books, I can audit a library in four hours. Why can't they? Ms.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Other - PSCOC Oct 8th, 2025

Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force

Transcript Highlights:
  • As it details on that note about the forensic auditing, instead, we're moving the team up to really work
  • We're auditing and currently working on the cleanup, but we've moved into Phase 2.
  • At the November meeting, once the auditing is complete, we'll be moving into specific items on these,
  • Reconciliations, audits, and maintaining.
  • We're also updating our draw schedules and monthly audits of these items to make sure that the expenses
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Office of Inspector General 3/24/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, up until a few years ago, all of the federal grant review, audits, and verification that were following
  • the federal guidelines and procedures, those were performed by the auditor.
  • <00:09:16.520> and<00:09:17.160> verification<00:09:17.840> that review, audits
  • , and verification that review, audits, and verification that we're<00:09:18.160> following<00
  • , those were performed by and procedures, those were performed by the<00:09:22.200> auditor.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up Senate File 856, relating to creation of an independent Office of Inspector General to fight fraud in Minnesota. Representative Norris presented a DE6 author’s amendment that he said fixed constitutional appointment language, expanded the office’s fraud-prevention role, and made other noncontroversial cleanup changes. He emphasized that the bill was still not finished and that more work remained before it would be ready for final House passage. Members raised several concerns. Representative Joy questioned language about who has primary investigative authority in Medicaid-related cases and whether the bill could create confusion over who may freeze funds; Norris responded that federal rules require administering agencies to be primary investigators and said the language was intended to comply with those rules while still ensuring investigations happen. Representative Bahner said the bill was improved, especially on constitutionality and prevention, but noted remaining concerns about agency expertise, duplication of effort, and funding. Representative Quam argued the state already has the Office of the Legislative Auditor and other processes in place, while Norris said an executive-branch office working directly with agencies could help ensure best practices are actually implemented. Several members, including Representative Cleborne and Representative Craft, said they remained concerned about duplication, cost, and language they believed still placed the new office above state law, though they acknowledged the bill was improved and constitutional issues had been addressed. The chair moved the DE6 amendment, which was adopted, and then the committee voted on Senate File 856 as amended. The bill passed on a roll call vote of 13 ayes and 1 nay and was referred to the Judiciary Committee.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Appropriations Committee May 23rd, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • AB 528, Alanis, criminal procedures CSAM: do pass out on a roll call.
  • AB 705, Berman, CPUC audits and investigations: do pass on an A roll call.
  • AB 938, Bonta, criminal procedure sentencing: do pass on a B roll call.
  • AB 1230, Bonta, student expulsion procedures: do pass on an A roll call.
  • AB 326, Chola, CSU audits: holding committee. AB 326, Chola, CSU audits: holding committee.
Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee held its May 23, 2025 suspense hearing and opened by emphasizing the difficult budget environment, rising costs for constituents, and the need to make tough choices. The chair said many bills would be held, amended to reduce costs, or made two-year bills because the state could not afford broad program expansions this year. The committee also noted the agenda was organized alphabetically by author and that results would be posted later that day. The committee then acted on a large suspense file, taking up hundreds of Assembly bills across topics including housing, health care, education, labor, public safety, climate, water, transportation, elections, and technology. Many bills were held in committee, while many others were approved with cost-saving, clarifying, or author’s amendments. Examples included measures on CalABLE, Covered California enrollment, wildfire and insurance issues, reproductive health, school and college programs, prison and juvenile justice matters, AI and data privacy, and local government and utility regulation. Several bills were converted to two-year bills to continue discussion. Throughout the hearing, the committee repeatedly voted on bills by A roll call or B roll call, often with Republicans not voting on amended measures. Some bills were advanced with notable amendments, such as narrowing scope, removing appropriations, delaying implementation, or striking costly provisions. The committee also approved a number of committee bills and omnibus measures, including emergency management, judiciary, insurance, and water-related bills. At the end of the hearing, the chair stated that the committee had moved 435 bills to the Assembly floor, either as do pass or do pass as amended, and adjourned the meeting.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • These requirements also must be included in the Elections Procedures Manual and would be subject to logic
  • Procedures and methods of sharing this information are already established.
  • Procedures and methods of sharing this information are already established.
  • Because we had some procedures in place to limit after-hours fueling, they left empty-handed.
  • Because we had some procedures in place to limit after-hours fueling, they left empty-handed.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up a long agenda of election, criminal justice, corrections, and county-government bills. Early election measures included SB 1436, requiring ballot language for certain school override and bond elections to estimate the secondary property tax impact; SB 1568, requiring election systems’ internal clocks to stay within 60 seconds of official time and making violations a misdemeanor; SB 1569, limiting special election board members from collecting or processing voter registration while assisting confined voters; and SB 1746, requiring voting centers to supplement rather than replace precinct polling places, requiring public offices and schools to provide polling space, and closing schools on primary and general election days for in-service training. SB 1436 and SB 1568 were eventually given do-pass recommendations, SB 1569 also passed committee, and SB 1746 passed despite concerns raised about school safety and access. Some bills were held earlier in the meeting and voted on later after testimony concluded. The committee also heard SB 1295, which would allow the Department of Corrections to release certain seriously ill inmates to contracted medical institutions if they qualify for ALTCS, with an amendment replacing disability language with illness-based criteria; the sponsor described it as a cost-saving measure that could shift care costs to federal programs. SB 1067, the so-called Gila County blight bill, would let counties place abatement costs for rubbish, debris, and dilapidated buildings on property tax bills and liens; county officials testified that it would help recover cleanup costs for blighted properties and heirs’ property, and it passed unanimously. SB 1413 would remove the $100,000 cap on restitution for serious injury or death caused by moving violations and passed after the sponsor said the cap had already been found unconstitutional. SB 1476 would make child neglect a class six felony when a custodian exposes a newborn to dangerous or narcotic drugs or causes fetal alcohol syndrome; supporters framed it as accountability and child protection, while opponents warned it could deter treatment and worsen family separation. The bill passed on a split vote. Later, the committee considered several criminal-justice and public-safety bills. SB 1512 would expand the definition of vulnerable adult and broaden “position of trust and confidence” for theft cases involving seniors and other vulnerable adults; testimony highlighted scams and exploitation of grieving or isolated elders, and the bill passed. SB 1585 would regulate sex-offender-specific evaluations, treatment, and polygraph services through the Sex Offender Management Board, add a surcharge fund and assessment on sexual-offense convictions, and appropriate funds to DPS; supporters said it would create uniform standards, while opponents questioned the need for additional fees, and it passed. SB 1662 would require probation conditions to be the least restrictive necessary and tailored to a defendant’s risk and needs; supporters from the Justice Action Network and criminal-defense advocates said it would improve rehabilitation and public safety, and it passed. The committee also began SB 1664, which would change constable petition-signature requirements in Maricopa and Pima counties, but the transcript cuts off before the full discussion and vote on that bill.