Transcript Highlights:

• It amends Chapter 18 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to conform the statute to case law and to
• Second way is, um, in the Peter and Kurd portion, the chapter 41. So This does two things.
• It says in an action to which this chapter applies, it is reversible error.
• One of my concerns on constitutionality is on Article 3, chapter section 66 of the Constitution, which
• We got into the chapter and verse.

Committee: House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:

• THIS YEAR'S SECURITIES PACKAGE WILL AMEND CHAPTER 517 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS.
• THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITION BROKERS SECTION OF CHAPTER 517 IS AMENDED TO ADOPT A REVISION TO NASA'S MODEL
• THE BILL ALSO INCLUDES TWO MUST PASS AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 517.
• FLORIDA AS CHAPTERS 670 THROUGH 680.
• CURRENTLY, TITLES PART TWO OF THE STATUTE CHAPTER THAT IT WOULD BE TITLED COMMERCIAL CODE TRANSITIONAL

Bills: SB 2 , HB 2 , HB 2000 , HB 2196 , HB 213 , HB 222 , HB 645 , HB 1458 , HB 1022 , HB 141 , HB 502 , HB 643 , HB 3093 , HB 1700 , HB 117 , SB 503 , SB 2 , HB 120 , HB 20 , HB 150 , HB 6 , HB 100 , HB 210 , HB 215 , HB 1393 , HB 1151 , HB 1268 , HB 142 , HB 451 , HB 124 , HB 2 , HB 2000 , HB 2196 , HB 213 , HB 222 , HB 645 , HB 1458 , HB 1022 , HB 141 , HB 502 , HB 643 , HB 3093 , HB 1700 , HB 117

Keywords: public education, teacher compensation, certification, funding, school finance, educator rights, education funding, charter schools, staff compensation, state aid, retention allotment, child grooming, sex offender registration, criminal justice, reportable conviction, law enforcement, virtual education, hybrid learning, school funding, average daily attendance

Transcript Highlights:

• It will<00:32:00.640><c> require</c><00:32:01.919><c> at</c><00:32:02.080><c> least</c><00:32:02.559>
• ><c> 1.1</c><00:32:06.960><c> and</c><00:32:07.279><c> or</c><00:32:07.519><c> 3.1</c><00:32:08.080><
• > to</c><00:32:13.760><c> that,</c><00:32:14.399><c> some</c><00:32:14.640><c> of</c><00:32:14.720><c
• <00:32:19.120><c> put</c><00:32:19.440><c> some</c><00:32:19.600><c> of</c><00:32:19.679><c> our</c><
• </c><00:32:21.039><c> So,</c><00:32:21.279><c> on</c><00:32:21.519><c> and</c><00:32:21.679><c> against

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Marco Duncan, on behalf of all of us are none, all chapters, we support.
• David Bolog, SFB Alliance, and on behalf of the San Fernando Valley Chapter of the California Pistol
• File item 32, AB 2274 by Bains. Also needs a motion. Moved by Senator Seyarto. Thank you.
• File item 32, AB 2274, Bains, motion was due pass to Appropriations.

Summary: The committee began without a quorum and heard several bills in subcommittee format. AB 1546, which would increase penalties for repeat DUI offenders by allowing a third DUI within 10 years to be charged as a wobbler, requiring a fifth DUI to be a felony, and lengthening ignition interlock and license revocation periods, drew strong support from law enforcement and district attorney groups and opposition from public defenders and reform advocates who argued the bill would further criminalize substance use and mental health issues. No vote was taken because there was no quorum at the time. AB 1595, aimed at standardizing post-conviction procedures for wrongful conviction claims and clarifying courts’ authority to consider new evidence, was supported by innocence and public defender organizations and opposed by district attorneys, who said existing habeas law is already clear and that the bill would add complexity and burden courts. AB 292, which would impose mandatory jail time for repeat felony domestic violence offenders within seven years, was supported by sheriffs, prosecutors, probation officers, and local governments, but opposed by domestic violence survivor advocates and public defender groups who warned it would not deter abuse and could criminalize survivors and divert resources from services. AB 1816, allowing courts to extend probation up to one additional year for sex offenders who have not completed required treatment, drew support from probation and law enforcement groups and opposition from public defenders and civil liberties advocates concerned about longer supervision, technical violations, and barriers such as poverty and treatment access; the committee later took a roll call and passed the bill 3-1, with one member not voting, sending it to Appropriations. After quorum was established, the committee also passed AB 1627, which would bar people with misconduct in immigration enforcement from becoming California peace officers, and AB 1927, which would create a misdemeanor for falsely impersonating a bail agent to solicit bail, both on due pass motions to Judiciary/Appropriations as amended. AB 1854, a shield-law measure expanding protections for reproductive and gender-affirming health care providers, patients, and related businesses from out-of-state legal process, was supported by the Attorney General’s office and reproductive rights groups and opposed by anti-abortion and family policy organizations; it was moved on a due pass motion to Judiciary. The committee then heard AB 1872, which would make repeat adult swatting offenses a felony/wobbler and require restitution for property damage, with support from law enforcement, prosecutors, and civil liberties advocates and opposition from public defenders and justice reform groups who argued the bill would not deter conduct and could disproportionately affect people with mental illness or undocumented status. A motion to advance AB 1872 was made, but the transcript cuts off before any final vote on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Marco Duncan, on behalf of all of us are none, all chapters, we support.
• David Bolog, SFB Alliance, and on behalf of the San Fernando Valley Chapter of the California Pistol
• File Item 32, AB 2274 by Baines. Also needs a motion. Moved by Senator Seyarto.
• File item 32, AB 2274, Baines. Motion was due pass to Appropriations. Current vote is 5 to 0.

Committee: Senate Public Safety

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :49.039><c> up</c><00:32:49.360><c> into</c><00:32:49.600><c> the</c><00:32:49.840><c> superintendent's
• </c><00:32:52.640><c> they</c><00:32:52.960><c> don't</c><00:32:53.120><c> discuss</c><00:32:53.519><
• </c><00:32:54.799><c> they</c><00:32:55.039><c> only</c><00:32:55.279><c> say</c><00:32:55.519><c> that
• they only say that the superintendent<00:32:56.640><c> is</c><00:32:57.039><c> doing</c><00:32:57.360
• :00.080><c> so</c><01:32:00.320><c> that</c><01:32:00.719><c> so</c><01:32:01.040><c> that</c><01:32:

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting focused on reviewing and amending draft minutes and then discussing a draft report on SAU consolidation and school administration efficiency. Members first corrected a disputed statement in the minutes about who starts charter schools, and agreed to mark it as disputed. They also noted a donation figure mentioned in the meeting but not reflected in the notes, and then approved the minutes as amended. The committee then reviewed supporting materials, including a Census Bureau education spending table and a 1993 report on eliminating SAUs. The chair argued New Hampshire ranks very high in administrative spending and used that as evidence for reducing administrative costs. Other members pushed back, noting that education costs are largely borne locally and that the committee should stay focused on its charge. Several members also objected to characterizations of SAU boards and to relying heavily on an old report or on the School District Governance Association’s proposal. The draft report itself drew repeated edits. Members objected to language suggesting the testimony from associations was simply that change was not needed, and proposed more neutral wording about concerns over the impacts of changes. There was also disagreement over a proposed model in which a county-level school administrator would be elected; some members said that would be inappropriate and premature, while others argued the committee had not yet fully developed a consolidation model. The discussion ended with a call from some members for more time and for a future joint legislative committee to continue refining any proposal before legislation is introduced.

Transcript Highlights:

• :32:01.440><c> fraud</c><00:32:02.000><c> reports</c><00:32:02.320><c> that</c><00:32:02.559><c> we</
• 32:07.440><c> the</c><00:32:07.840><c> referral</c><00:32:08.320><c> the</c><00:32:08.559><c> case</c
• </c><00:32:09.440><c> of</c><00:32:09.519><c> fluctuated</c><00:32:10.960><c> over</c><00:32:11.279><
• ><c> so</c><00:32:12.159><c> I</c><00:32:12.399><c> can</c><00:32:12.559><c> we</c><00:32:12.799><c>
• I don't<00:32:14.320><c> have</c><00:32:14.399><c> it</c><00:32:14.720><c> able</c><00:32:14.960><c>

Committee: House Commerce Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:00.640><c> When</c><00:32:00.760><c> we</c><00:32:00.880><c> talked</c><00:32:01.160><c> about
• /c><00:32:02.600><c> this</c><00:32:02.760><c> is</c><00:32:02.880><c> kind</c><00:32:03.040><c> of</
• ><c> that</c><00:32:03.920><c> I</c><00:32:04.000><c> worked</c><00:32:04.240><c> on</c><00:32:04.400
• on when I was<00:32:05.000><c> uh</c><00:32:05.080><c> a</c><00:32:05.120><c> freshman</c><00:32:05.480
• </c><00:32:06.520><c> but</c><00:32:07.040><c> last</c><00:32:07.360><c> year</c><00:32:07.480><c> being

Bills: HF3900 , HF1849

Committee: House Rules and Legislative Administration

Keywords: permanent school fund, school endowment fund, Minnesota constitutional amendment, school aid, public school funding, State Board of Investment, investment income, distributable amount, school districts, property taxes, income taxes, voter approval, ballot question, constitutional amendment 2026, education finance, fund perpetuity, purchasing power, trust lands, swamp lands, internal improvement land fund

Transcript Highlights:

• > bring</c><00:32:02.720><c> kids</c><00:32:03.040><c> back</c><00:32:03.600><c> into</c><00:32:03.920
• ><c> And</c><00:32:04.920><c> it</c><00:32:04.960><c> was</c><00:32:05.120><c> the</c><00:32:05.320><
• like the<00:32:09.560><c> West</c><00:32:09.760><c> Side</c><00:32:10.000><c> Boosters</c><00:32:10.680
• West Side Boosters that had an enrollment<00:32:11.880><c> of</c><00:32:11.960><c> 900</c><00:32:13.240
• kids participate, whether<00:32:15.240><c> they</c><00:32:15.360><c> could</c><00:32:15.480><c> afford

Bills: HF1660 , HF1824 , HF1926 , HF1002 , HF994 , HF1915 , HF1336

Committee: House Children and Families Finance and Policy

Keywords: children, youth programming, needs assessment, community engagement, state funding, education, funding, school districts, state budget, rural schools, food support, Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches, food shelves, grant funding, Minnesota FoodShare, early childhood, Head Start, education funding, developmental programs, literacy

Transcript Highlights:

• So did<00:32:01.919><c> that</c><00:32:02.159><c> answer</c><00:32:02.480><c> your</c><00:32:02.720><
• </c><00:32:04.880><c> Uh</c><00:32:05.440><c> let</c><00:32:05.600><c> me</c><00:32:05.760><c> go</c>
• :32:45.360><c> person</c><00:32:45.600><c> to</c><00:32:45.840><c> run</c><00:32:46.000><c> the</c><00
• :32:48.000><c> within</c><00:32:48.559><c> CDC.
• As<00:32:51.279><c> background,</c><00:32:52.000><c> there</c><00:32:52.159><c> are</c><00:32:52.399>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The New Hampshire House Special Committee on the COVID Response Efficacy met to continue its fact-finding review of the state’s pandemic response, with the chair restating the committee’s mission and focus on federal guidance, federal funding, emergency use authorization vaccination efforts, long COVID, patient rights, and vaccination policies. The chair said the committee had previously reviewed materials about the U.S. Supreme Court declining to hear a COVID vaccine case and CDC internal emails about vaccine risks, and introduced additional research on CDC testing and communications failures. A large portion of the meeting was devoted to summarizing articles and a recent U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report titled *Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals*. The chair argued that CDC testing and guidance were flawed, citing delayed data publication, confusing guidance, a faulty early COVID test, missed opportunities to study silent spread, and alleged suppression of safety information. The Senate report was described as alleging that FDA and CDC officials knew their surveillance systems could mask vaccine safety signals, that officials discouraged internal analysis from being shared externally, and that newer analytical methods identified multiple statistically significant adverse-event signals. The chair also discussed the V-safe system, VAERS, and claims that federal officials downplayed or concealed adverse-event data. Members and the chair connected these federal issues to New Hampshire, noting changes in the state’s health care landscape since the pandemic, including more urgent care facilities and satellite ERs. The chair suggested New Hampshire should develop independent scientific assessment resources to validate federal information in future emergencies. Representative Wheeler noted that the materials would be entered into the committee record and made available on the House website. No votes were taken; the committee discussed the materials, invited further questions, and indicated that a proposed committee communication would be revisited later after additional supporting information is gathered, with a goal of issuing a statement by the end of June.

Transcript Highlights:

• :01.120><c> order</c><00:32:01.279><c> to</c><00:32:01.440><c> get</c><00:32:01.600><c> a</c><00:32:01.760
• </c><00:32:03.600><c> like</c><00:32:03.760><c> it</c><00:32:03.919><c> was</c><00:32:04.000><c> so</
• so important and<00:32:04.799><c> they</c><00:32:05.039><c> could</c><00:32:05.120><c> use</c><00:32:
• And then<00:32:07.039><c> lastly,</c><00:32:07.760><c> things</c><00:32:08.080><c> that</c><00:32:08.399
• So engaging, you<00:32:11.919><c> know,</c><00:32:12.640><c> growing</c><00:32:13.120><c> or</c><00:32

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:15 Roll Call 00:00:45 Discussion of Pro-Growth Housing Policies 00:02:33 Adjournment 01:17:15, 958, all

Summary: The Housing Task Force 2.0 reconvened with several new members and heard a presentation from Kentucky Housing Corporation Executive Director Winston Miller and Deputy Executive Director Wendy Smith. They framed the task force’s work as a practical effort to address Kentucky’s housing shortage, update members on the current housing landscape, summarize existing state and federal resources, and suggest areas for the task force to focus on over the coming year. KHC said its 2024 housing supply gap analysis found Kentucky is short about 206,000 housing units, split roughly evenly between rental and homeownership, and projected the gap could grow to 287,000 units by 2029 if current trends continue. They emphasized that every county in Kentucky needs more housing, that the 2008 housing crisis and loss of construction capacity remain major causes of the shortage, and that current pressures include high interest rates, rising insurance and tax costs, construction cost inflation, and housing prices and rents growing faster than incomes. KHC also said homelessness has risen in Kentucky, with point-in-time counts showing double-digit increases in recent years. The presenters reviewed existing resources, including federal programs, the Kentucky Affordable Housing Trust Fund, the rural housing trust fund, KHC mortgage and down payment assistance programs, and the state mortgage interest deduction. They said these resources are important but insufficient to close the gap, and noted that a proposed federal FY2026 budget would cut HUD programs by 44%, potentially removing about $286 million from Kentucky housing resources, though no action has been taken yet. They urged the task force to consider stronger, more flexible tools such as a revolving loan fund, a state affordable housing tax credit, and economic development and employer-assisted housing incentives, and pointed to Indiana’s housing infrastructure and regional development funds as examples. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• :01.279><c> in</c><00:32:01.440><c> in</c><00:32:01.760><c> our</c><00:32:02.000><c> statutes.
• In some places,<00:32:03.679><c> we</c><00:32:03.919><c> have</c><00:32:04.159><c> honorably</c><00:32
• :05.519><c> and</c><00:32:05.679><c> in</c><00:32:05.919><c> some</c><00:32:06.080><c> places,</c><00
• :32:06.399><c> we</c><00:32:06.720><c> have</c><00:32:07.519><c> uh,</c> veteran, and in some places,
• </c><00:32:08.799><c> And</c><00:32:09.840><c> uh</c><00:32:10.640><c> in</c><00:32:10.799><c> in</c>

Committee: Senate Executive Departments and Administration

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Next,<00:32:27.480><c> the</c><00:32:27.600><c> proposed</c><00:32:28.240><c> wording</c><00:32:28.640
• :32:31.480><c> need</c><00:32:31.720><c> to</c><00:32:31.840><c> include</c> deception.
• The<00:32:34.360><c> term</c><00:32:34.600><c> pregnancy</c><00:32:35.240><c> discrimination</c><00:32
• :37.040><c> deceive</c><00:32:37.600><c> voters</c><00:32:38.080><c> who</c><00:32:38.280><c> won't</
• :32:40.800><c> to</c><00:32:40.920><c> birth</c><00:32:41.280><c> for</c><00:32:41.480><c> any</c> It

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Public Safety

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c> in</c><00:32:25.519><c> unmet</c><00:32:26.320><c> requests</c><00:32:27.120><c> last</c><00:32:27.440
• </c><00:32:28.799><c> And</c><00:32:29.039><c> so</c><00:32:29.279><c> what</c><00:32:29.519><c> we're
• 32:31.600><c> increasing</c><00:32:32.159><c> that</c><00:32:32.480><c> from</c><00:32:32.720><c> 1</
• ><c> to</c><00:32:33.760><c> 4</c><00:32:34.000><c> million</c><00:32:34.240><c> with</c><00:32:34.480
• &gt;&gt; Thank<00:32:37.120><c> you,</c><00:32:37.360><c> Chair</c><00:32:37.600><c> Scott.

Bills: HF3874 , HF962

Committee: House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Keywords: judicial funding, Chief Justice security, fiscal year 2028, court system, judicial branch, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• :44.679><c> seen</c><00:32:45.000><c> for</c><00:32:45.279><c> quite</c><00:32:45.519><c> some</c><00
• and government institutions<00:32:50.799><c> reaches</c><00:32:51.159><c> a</c><00:32:51.279><c> new
• </c><00:32:51.440><c> low</c><00:32:51.679><c> it</c><00:32:51.880><c> seems</c> institutions reaches
• ><c> single</c><00:32:53.279><c> day</c><00:32:54.279><c> the</c><00:32:54.440><c> public</c><00:32:54.760
• <00:32:57.440><c> on</c><00:32:57.559><c> to</c><00:32:57.919><c> power</c><00:32:58.799><c> at</c><00

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:00.679><c> But</c><00:32:00.840><c> this</c><00:32:01.000><c> funding</c><00:32:01.360><c>
• </c><00:32:02.800><c> that</c><00:32:02.920><c> is</c><00:32:03.040><c> broadly</c> appropriated for
• :04.560><c> in</c><00:32:04.720><c> the</c><00:32:04.840><c> state,</c><00:32:05.560><c> and</c><00:32
• the state, and should be preserved<00:32:06.640><c> in</c><00:32:06.760><c> its</c><00:32:06.920><c>
• Second, uh<00:32:10.800><c> D1</c><00:32:11.480><c> would</c><00:32:11.679><c> weaken</c><00:32:12.040

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee heard House File 3493, the Safe Schools Revenue Increase bill, and first adopted the DE amendment before moving the bill on for re-referral to Ways and Means. Representative Lawrence described the bill as a multi-layered school safety package for all students and schools, including public, nonpublic, charter, and tribal schools, with increased safety funding, mental health support, anonymous threat reporting, school safety plans, and student discipline changes. Several supporters emphasized the need for flexible safety funding and cited real-world safety concerns, including anonymous tip systems that had generated many reports, classroom evacuations, staff injuries, and the need for more resources for mental health and safety infrastructure. Some supporters, including charter school leaders and Catholic Conference testimony, argued the bill’s flexibility and broader safety approach were important, while others supported the K-3 suspension language as a needed tool in severe cases. Opponents focused heavily on the bill’s repeal of Minnesota’s K-3 suspension ban and non-exclusionary discipline requirements. Legal aid, disability advocates, and education groups argued that suspensions harm young children, worsen disparities, and disproportionately affect students of color and students with disabilities, and they urged the committee to keep restorative and non-exclusionary practices in place. Disability advocates also asked that any safety planning explicitly account for students with disabilities and that the bill remain aligned with IDEA protections and individualized education decisions. Several testifiers opposed using public funds for private schools, saying public money should stay in public programs. Other testimony came from school administrators and staff who supported restoring limited suspension discretion, describing serious elementary incidents, classroom evacuations, and injuries that they said required a short-term removal option to stabilize classrooms and plan for students’ return. Mental health and school support personnel witnesses stressed that safety and mental health funding should remain distinct and that more counselors, social workers, and related staff are needed to address student crises. No final vote on the bill itself was taken in the portion provided beyond adoption of the DE amendment and the motion to re-refer the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• :44.519><c> budget</c><00:32:45.480><c> concerns</c><00:32:46.000><c> coming</c><00:32:46.519><c> this
• seems like<00:32:47.000><c> a</c><00:32:47.200><c> very</c><00:32:47.519><c> targeted</c><00:32:48.159
• ><c> way</c><00:32:48.519><c> to</c><00:32:49.320><c> get</c><00:32:49.480><c> some</c> like a very targeted
• ><c> in</c><00:32:50.600><c> thank</c><00:32:50.760><c> you</c><00:32:50.919><c> please</c> more revenues
• ><c> than</c><00:32:52.279><c> you</c><00:32:53.279><c> League</c><00:32:53.519><c> of</c><00:32:53.679

Committee: Senate Ways and Means

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee took up House Bill 422, relating to school impact fees. The Education Committee recommended passage with amendments, and Ways and Means concurred. The amendments would repeal the construction fee component of the school impact fee while retaining the land impact fee and in-lieu fee requirements, remove related statutory language, exempt certain developments from school impact fees, raise the unit threshold for satisfying the land component to 100 units, require the School Facilities Authority to adopt rules and policies, and require a report to the Legislature on the effect of repealing the construction portion of the fee. The measure was also given a sunset date of June 30, 2029, with the committee report to note that the changes are intended to test the efficiency and efficacy of the fee structure and could be made permanent if the report supports that outcome. The committees adopted the recommendation, with one senator initially voting no and then changing to yes after the amendments were explained. The meeting also included a separate hearing on House Bill 1155, concerning procurement for Department of Transportation projects and construction manager/general contractor procurement. DOT testified that it supported the concept but wanted to narrow the bill, saying the current language was too broad and that the goal was to allow more innovative procurement while preserving selection safeguards. The State Procurement Office said it supported the bill’s language but was willing to work with DOT on alternative wording. Several construction-related organizations, including subcontractors, iron workers, elevator constructors, and building trades representatives, opposed the bill, arguing that exemptions from the procurement code would weaken protections such as retainage, equality, and prompt payment and could invite favoritism or corruption. In response to those concerns, the chair proposed amendments limiting the exemption to DOT, narrowing the qualifying contracts, adding a two-year sunset, requiring a report after the first year, and clarifying that project management could not be procured under the section. The amended recommendation passed, though several members voted with reservations. A separate item, House Bill 476, was briefly called up at the end of the agenda, with a recommendation to pass with amendments to increase a rate from 7.25% to 8%, but discussion was not completed in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:02.840><c> is</c><00:32:03.360><c> two</c><00:32:03.600><c> scrs</c><00:32:04.200><c> above
• </c><00:32:04.440><c> this</c><00:32:04.559><c> one</c><00:32:04.760><c> I</c> 1323 which is two scrs
• ><c> uhr</c> think it's uhr think it's uhr 715<00:32:09.039><c> what</c><00:32:09.159><c> is</c><00:32
• :09.279><c> the</c><00:32:09.399><c> bill</c><00:32:09.600><c> number</c> 715 what is the bill number
• peruso uh representative peruso uh 1323<00:32:12.519><c> okay</c><00:32:12.840><c> that's</c><00:32:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And now he is ready to lead the entire Vermont National Guard into its next chapter.
• Guard into the entire Vermont National Guard into its<00:08:35.360><c> next</c><00:08:35.599><c> chapter
• </c> its next chapter. its next chapter.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Olivia Tanager, on behalf of the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter, for the record.
• Madam Chair, members of the committee, Alexis Motorax with the Nevada Chapter of Associated General Contractors
• Doug Unger, UNLV chapter president, Nevada Faculty Alliance.
• Doug Unger, UNLV chapter president, Nevada Faculty Alliance.

Bills: SB6 , SB62 , SB74 , SB90 , SB104 , SB119 , SB132 , SB133 , SB135 , SB182 , SB185 , SB193 , SB207 , SB217 , SB229 , SB233 , SB260 , SB262 , SB280 , SB281 , SB300 , SB306 , SB378 , SB382 , SB393 , SB403 , SB422 , SB427 , SB431 , SB434 , SB442 , SB452 , SB456 , SB468 , SB472 , SB487 , SB503 , SB6

Committee: Assembly Ways and Means

Keywords: cloud seeding, Nevada, water conservation, agriculture, Desert Research Institute, victim compensation, hate crimes, property remediation, criminal justice, vulnerable persons, elections, voter registration, mail ballots, candidate eligibility, cybersecurity, education funding, teacher grants, classroom supplies, instructional support, specialized personnel