Transcript Highlights:

• Or establish fees?
• When we talk about increasing user fees, user fees are capped, I'm just... ...be through ad valorem taxes
• When we talk about increasing user fees, user fees are capped to a certain amount because of Medicare
• The Children's Services Council can't assess fees. Who are you going to assess your fee on?
• The Children's Services Council can't assess fees. Who are you going to assess your fee on?

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Some cities charge $40,000, $50,000, or $60,000 per unit for their park mitigation impact fee, and in
• I want to reiterate, SB 499 does not create new fees or increase the amount charged.
• I want to reiterate, SB 499 does not create new fees or increase the amount of charge.
• While local agencies retain the ability to assess impact fees, SB 358 ensures that those fees are actually
• Session schedules as follows: Tomorrow, Thursday, September 4th, floor session at 10 a.m.

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, welcomed visiting students from De La Salle High School and a guest for Assembly Member Kalra, and then moved through a lengthy concurrence and third-reading agenda. Early actions included concurrence on ACR 21 honoring fallen Galt Police Officer Herminda Grewal, followed by a series of mostly noncontroversial bills on utilities, reclamation districts, housing, wildfire relief, mobile homes, environmental quality, health care coverage, and local government. Several measures were presented as technical, clarifying, or urgency bills, and many passed with unanimous or near-unanimous votes; notable items included AB 238 (wildfire mortgage forbearance), AB 571 (Southern California Veterans Cemetery permitting/CEQA exemption), AB 574 (health care coverage), AB 696 (lithium-ion battery safety advisory group), AB 1150 (airport car rental facility maintenance), AB 1154 (ADU parking standards), and SB 499 (impact fee deferrals for emergency-related parkland and utility infrastructure). SB 499 drew the most debate, with supporters emphasizing disaster resilience and dual-use parkland and an opponent arguing it would worsen housing-related fee burdens; it ultimately passed after a call was lifted. The chamber also adopted SJR 4 urging restoration of NIH funding, and passed SB 230 expanding workers’ compensation presumptions to additional firefighters, SB 92 tightening density bonus law to curb loopholes, SB 782 creating disaster relief financing districts, SB 40 capping insulin copays at $35 and limiting step therapy, SB 362 strengthening small-business financing disclosures, SB 513 requiring workers access to training records, SB 489 requiring public agencies involved in housing approvals to post requirements online, SB 31 promoting recycled water use, SB 551 introducing normalization and dynamic security concepts in corrections, SB 639 extending flood-protection deadlines for Sacramento/Yuba projects, SB 653 defining environmentally sensitive vegetation management, AB 652 on air pollution, and SB 221 updating stalking law to include threats to pets. Several bills received recorded opposition or split votes, including SB 551, SB 439, SB 782, and SB 499, but most measures passed comfortably. The Assembly also concurred in Senate amendments on AB 516 and AB 1523, and later lifted the call on SB 499 to complete passage. The session included an adjournment in memory of Rick Bryson of Long Beach, with Assembly Member Lowenthal highlighting Bryson’s athletic, business, and civic contributions. The day ended with reminders to secure floor managers for pending bills, a notice of the next day’s 10 a.m. floor session, and adjournment until Thursday, September 4th.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:05:42.759> or hearing scheduled at 11:20 a.m. or hearing scheduled at 11:20 a.m. or around
• <00:32:37.919> of time a fee of time a fee of $100<00:32:40.880> up<00:32:41.080>
• Then I review their proposed schedules, confer with track officials, and explain the schedule to the
• <00:43:57.720> schedule Is it true that a municipality publishes the fee schedule for these
• that are scheduled to be heard.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Everyday crypto users generally do not use them because the fees are predatory.
• If you go online for a crypto exchange for $1,000, you'd pay $10 to $15 in fees.
• At a kiosk, you'd pay $100 to $200 or more in fees. The model doesn't make sense.
• Fees can be well over 20% of the underlying transaction.
• Directing a portion of the transportation impact fee to it is smart policy.

Bills: HB373

Keywords: infused beverages, THC, alcohol control, regulation, non-intoxicating cannabinoids, marijuana, legalization, taxation

Summary: The Senate Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee met in hybrid format and heard testimony on several bills. HB 373, as amended, would regulate hemp-derived THC-infused beverages by defining the products, limiting them to 10 mg of Delta-9 THC per container, restricting sales to package stores and licensed marijuana retail stores, requiring testing and labeling, and imposing a 50-cent per container tax; the sponsor said the bill is intended to create guardrails and protect youth, and a wholesaler representative testified in support. HB 398 would allow racinos to serve alcohol until 2 a.m. and remove local authority to require earlier closing times; the sponsor and Bally’s representative said it would help Delaware remain competitive and increase revenue, and no opposition was heard. HB 433 would let municipalities and counties extend last call for bars, restaurants, and clubs from 1 a.m. to 2 a.m.; a witness from Connect Delaware supported it as a competitiveness and retention measure, emphasizing that it is permissive rather than mandatory. The committee also heard extensive testimony on HB 441, which would ban cryptocurrency kiosks/crypto ATMs in Delaware and require existing machines to be removed within 90 days. The sponsor and supporters, including AARP, the Delaware Department of Justice, and the League of Women Voters, argued the machines are heavily used in scams, especially against older adults, and that regulation has not been effective. CoinFlip opposed the bill, saying it is a regulated operator, that the fraud statistics are overstated or incomplete, and that Delaware should instead adopt a regulatory framework and amendment. HB 465 would update the criminal code to formally define virtual currency and incorporate it into theft, money laundering, racketeering, and search-and-seizure provisions; the sponsor said it would align Delaware law with modern crypto-related crimes, and no opposition was presented. The committee then heard HB 467, which would prevent landlords from requiring renters to buy insurance from a specific company while still allowing them to require coverage meeting lease terms; the sponsor described it as a consumer-choice bill and there was no public opposition. HB 435 would require payment parity for certified registered nurse anesthetists and physicians when the same services are provided; the sponsor, nurse anesthetists, the Delaware Health Care Association, the Department of Insurance, and ChristianaCare supported it as a workforce and access-to-care measure, with no opposition. Finally, HS 1 for HB 450, the Road DE Act, would overhaul permitting and traffic-impact review, emphasize peak-hour traffic, set density standards in growth areas, create a transportation impact fee, and direct some revenue to open space, farmland, and coastal restoration; realtors, builders, environmental groups, engineers, and GEAR supported it as a way to speed permitting, reduce sprawl, and improve infrastructure planning. The committee adjourned after public comment; no votes were recorded in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• fee.
• The direct answer is that the only fee is the fee on the paint, and that fee is circumscribed by the
• We can then figure out what our budget is and then really determine what the schedule of fees should
• be it's a smaller fee for of fees should be it's a smaller fee for a<00:53:07.680> smaller<00
• The tax is the fee.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 451, which would create a postconsumer paint stewardship program in New Hampshire. Prime sponsor Representative Karen Ebel described the bill as a bipartisan, broadly supported model based on PaintCare programs used in other states. She said consumers and businesses could drop off leftover paint at participating retailers or municipal household hazardous waste sites, with the paint then collected and recycled by the stewardship organization. She emphasized that the program is intended to reduce landfill disposal, improper dumping, and contamination of groundwater and soil, while also helping municipalities save on hazardous waste handling costs. Members asked several questions about how the program would work and how it would be funded. Ebel explained that the program would be financed by a small fee charged at the point of sale on paint products, not a general sales tax, and that retailers could either list it separately or roll it into the price. She said the fee would cover the Department of Environmental Services’ administrative costs, which were described as minimal, and that the program’s structure was developed with DES and industry input. Questions also addressed whether cans would be recycled and how collected paint would be processed; Ebel said the ACA and PaintCare representatives could provide more detail, but that the paint and containers would be handled through recycling or other approved disposal methods rather than landfilled. Representative Judy Aron, a co-sponsor and chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, testified in support, saying the bill had been developed over several years with stakeholders and would keep toxic paint out of landfills while saving municipalities and taxpayers money. Representative Peter Bixby, the ranking member of Environment and Agriculture, also supported the bill, saying his committee had heard it many times and that it had strong bipartisan enthusiasm. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• GRD 5173 is funded by, by revenues generated from forensic analyst licensing and testing fees, which
• generated through the collection of registration of test fees and test fees.
• the agency, we asked if they had considered application and exams, increasing application and exam fees
• The agency had indicated that they would consider raising these fees, but wanted to be careful not to
• We're also asking for an increase in court reporter fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• , and so, or an annual fee?
• ...a permanent fee and so, or an annual fee?
• and an annual fee.
• Okay... ...application fee and an annual fee. Okay.
• fees for the indigent defense application fee, which is $35 upon application for that to have an attorney

Bills: SB2012

Keywords: transportation, funding, infrastructure, grants, municipal, 908, all

Summary: The Government Operations Division met to continue work on budget and bill amendments. The committee first took up the Attorney General’s budget and reviewed a detailed amendment package that adjusted FTE levels, salary equity funding, funding sources, and several one-time appropriations. Changes included removing some House-added items, adding contingent funding tied to other bills, restoring certain funding sources, increasing the electronic smoking device manufacturer fee, and adding a provision on 24/7 sobriety program fees. Senator Dwyer then offered a further amendment to make the electronic smoking device fee a $2,000 application fee with a $500 annual renewal fee, which passed. The committee then voted 4-1 to adopt the budget as amended and give it a do pass recommendation as amended. The committee next considered House Bill 1143, relating to Great Plains Food Bank funding. After testimony from Amy Cleary on behalf of Great Plains Food Bank, members discussed the organization’s statewide role and the project’s financing, including a planned $30 million facility and existing fundraising. Senator Burkhard moved to restore the appropriation from $5 million to $10 million, and the motion passed 4-1. The committee then voted 4-1 to give the bill a do pass recommendation as amended, with Senator Burkhard designated as carrier. Finally, the committee discussed House Bill 1524, which would fund regional planning councils and authorize 16 FTEs. Members expressed sympathy for the councils’ work but concerns about approving new state-funded positions. No action was taken, and the chair asked to hold the bill over for further review. The committee then recessed, noting remaining budget work and upcoming hearings.

Transcript Highlights:

• If an authority member would like to add an agenda item to the next regular scheduled meeting, please
• I'll make a motion to approve the land area, population, and fees.
• So, we're still trying to get that schedule out. And everything else is in and I'm sorry.
• I think I have waiting to be scheduled. Leadership Oklahoma, appreciate Mrs.
• We may schedule a meeting with the new director. Never mind, we're not going to do that.

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• review fee.
• Uh the fee hiccup that I mentioned.
• I seem to only indicate a reduction in a fee, the general fee from 500 to 250 and the square foot from
• from reduction in a fee, the general fee from reduction in a fee, the general fee from 500<01:52
• intentional to reduce that fee. intentional to reduce that fee.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, I do know that we had a hybrid fee, I think, for a year perhaps.
• And on the electric vehicle, the user fee on that, we have a user fee on electric vehicles and plug-in
• fee was removed. removed. removed.
• user fee on that, we we have a user fee user fee on that, we we have a user fee on<00:13:56.399>
• for all the projects that are scheduled for all the projects that are scheduled for<00:21:52.720

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met on Transportation, approved the prior meeting minutes, and received a road fund update from Transportation Cabinet officials Mike Hancock, Sean McCernan, and Ron Rigney. McCernan reported that FY 2024-2025 road fund revenue came in $38.5 million above the enacted estimate, but was about $11 million below FY24 because of a lower motor fuels tax rate. He said motor vehicle usage tax receipts were stronger than expected, and that the road fund ended the year with a $61.6 million surplus account that, under the budget bill, must be appropriated to state construction. Members focused heavily on how declining motor fuels receipts affect the formula funds that support cities, counties, and rural/secondary roads. Hancock and McCernan explained that lower gas tax receipts reduce both the road plan and revenue sharing, while higher vehicle sales tax receipts from motor vehicle usage go directly to the road fund and do not help the formula distributions. They also said fuel efficiency, hybrid and electric vehicle trends, and the removal of a prior hybrid fee all affect revenue collections. On tolling, officials said Louisville bridge toll revenues are covering bills and commitments, but they did not have the latest collection figures in front of them and said they would provide them later. The committee also asked about project delivery delays, right-of-way acquisition, disaster recovery work, annual contract awards, cash management, and overprogramming in the highway plan. Officials said project delays often stem from right-of-way purchases, utility relocation, and the large volume of projects in the plan, and described the process as a “duck paddling” situation with substantial work happening behind the scenes. They said FY25 contract awards were already just under $998 million by the July letting and expected to exceed last year’s total, and explained that cash balances are managed so they do not fall below $100 million; the current balance was said to be about $166 million. No further votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• A $50 fee for something like this is not... They're still drastically lower than other states.
• A $50 fee for something like this is not usually cost-prohibitive. I understand Mr.
• If that ever changes, they'll change the title of it in the scheduling orders.
• Line 19, the word schedule. That's what we do.
• I mean, scheduling is different than actually having the hearing.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Not pro bono, not for a fee, nothing. nothing.
• That's for me as scheduled after recess.
• That's for me as scheduled after recess.
• That's for me as scheduled after recess.
• That's for me as scheduled after recess. That's for me as scheduled after recess.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, the next fee items are the dees boat fee, dees dam fee, dees hazardous waste generation fee, generator
• fee, automotive fee, hazardous fee, and hazard waste fee.
• So um the next the dees boat fee, dees So um the next the dees boat fee, dees dam<00:47:13.920> fee
• fee, automotive fee, fee, generator fee, automotive fee, hazardous<00:47:19.920> fee,<00:47:20.319
• hazardous fee, and hazard waste fee. hazardous fee, and hazard waste fee.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee worked through several HB 2 budget amendments, focusing first on energy-related transfers and then on judicial funding. For the energy item, members discussed moving remaining money from the renewable energy fund into the general fund for the biennium, with later-year amounts going to the general fund rather than ratepayers. They noted the proposal was based on prior House Bill 111 language, that the exact amount was still being worked out with the Department of Energy, and that some language about “incentive payments” was being removed or clarified. Amendment 1211H was moved and adopted on a 5-4 vote. The committee then considered amendment 1040 on the governor’s scholarship fund, which would eliminate the program and sweep uncommitted funds. Members supporting the program argued it helps New Hampshire students afford in-state college and should be reworked rather than repealed; opponents said the remaining balance was limited and the program should be ended. Amendment 1040 was defeated 4-5. The committee then turned to a judicial council request tied to a Franklin Pierce criminal justice clinic that had previously used ARPA funds. Supporters said the clinic cleared 323 cases in nine months, provided training for future attorneys, and could reduce more expensive assigned-counsel costs by helping the public defender system handle cases more efficiently. The amendment would add $100,000 to the judicial council line for that purpose. There was some confusion over the line item and whether the request should be attributed to the judicial branch or judicial council, which was corrected during discussion. Members also discussed a larger issue: the judicial council’s budget request appeared lower than intended because of a possible clerical error in how prior-year funding was calculated, especially after the last budget combined HB 1 and HB 2 funding. The committee compared the public defender line and assigned counsel line, noting that if public defender funding is cut, more cases would shift to assigned counsel, which is more expensive. No final vote on the judicial council amendment is shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• That is based on the debt service schedule for debt that the department is currently issued.
• It was the last time I believe we increased vehicle registration fees.
• So I'll take vehicle registration fees as an example.
• Electric vehicle registration fee.
• So I'm just curious how these fees or these surpluses or surcharges were arrived at.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It authorizes the board to impose late fees and revises the board's authority to...
• We talk about disciplinary civil penalties, late fees, and non-disciplinary administrative fines.
• The next paragraph talks about the board adopting a civil penalty and an administrative fee schedule
• Therefore, we had to hit hard on the definition of fines, fees, and penalties.
• I paid the fee and went on; there was no consequence to me.

Bills: HB123

Keywords: pharmacy, pharmacist licensure, Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, renewal fees, continuing education, disciplinary actions, 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• fee-based program.
• In our fee process to develop the fees, we are looking at both application fees and annual fees if the
• Looking at the scale of fees, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah charge the highest permit fees to municipal
• There is considerable diversity among states in the fee schedule; some have flat fees while others use
• Fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• Does that language include scheduling? It does not include scheduling.
• Does that language include scheduling? Does that language include scheduling?
• It's that 30-day scheduling House.
• <02:12:30.639> n<02:12:31.280> um scheduling to the scheduling or n um scheduling to
• So the fees, so this transcripts.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And what this is is a schedule of fees that the Department of Fish and Wildlife uses every year for the
• And what this is is a schedule of fees that the Department of Fish and Wildlife uses every year for the
• And what this is is a schedule of fees that the Department of Fish and Wildlife uses every year for the
• a schedule of fees that the is a a schedule of fees that the Department<00:36:41.640> of<00:36
• fee.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• talking about here is the $50 annual fee talking about here is the $50 annual fee for<00:05:06.520
• If the inspection fee is $100, do you think the inspection fee is adequate?
• So let's talk... last time the fee was um increased yeah last time the fee was um increased yeah uh<00
• want to represent if the inspection fee want to represent if the inspection fee is<00:11:46.760>
• is $100 do you think the inspection fee is $100 do you think the inspection fee is adequate<00:11

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first discussed a proposed increase to the annual elevator certificate fee in the Department of Labor. The commissioner said the fee had been $50 for years and generated just under $300,000 annually, while the Inspection Division’s broader revenue far exceeded its expenses. Members noted the fee only covered the certificate, not the inspection itself, which is billed separately at $100 per hour. After comparing the fee to neighboring states and discussing the department’s revenue and staffing, the committee agreed to rewrite the language to set the fee at $75 and to vote on an amendment later. The committee then took up Section 139, which would expand the list of labor-law violations that can be penalized without first issuing a warning. The Department explained the change was meant to align House Bill 157 with other chapters, including youth employment and workers’ compensation provisions, where immediate civil penalties are already allowed. The section was accepted unanimously. A longer discussion followed on the Second Injury Fund. The commissioner explained that the fund reimburses insurers for certain workers’ compensation costs tied to claims involving pre-existing conditions, is financed by assessments on insurers, and requires notice within 100 weeks of injury plus a $10,000 deductible before reimbursement. He said the fund currently holds roughly $16 million to $22 million, one full-time employee administers it, and total staff involvement is about five to six people. Members questioned whether the fund should be sunset, but the department said the current House Bill 2 language does not propose a sunset; instead, it addresses increased hearing and litigation burdens after a recent Supreme Court decision. Sections 140 and 141, dealing with hearings, were then accepted unanimously. The committee also briefly discussed fines for late insurance coverage reporting, with the department noting the current rubric allows up to $50 per day but uses $112 per day, and members suggesting a lower amount.

Transcript Highlights:

• Attorneys are assessed a fee for being members of the New Hampshire Bar, and that fee is approved by
• I’ve scheduled some hearings for the 29th, and I did schedule those for 9:30.
• > for<01:30:50.679> 9:30 29th and I did schedule those for 9:30 29th and I did schedule
• <01:39:31.520> uh scheduled for January 29th at 1 p.m. uh scheduled for January 29th at 1
• going to come after them for those fees going to come after them for those fees because<04:51:12.760

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee met for its first meeting of the new session with opening remarks, member introductions, and a discussion of committee logistics. Members described their backgrounds and priorities, including criminal justice, right-to-know and privacy issues, domestic violence, death-with-dignity legislation, abortion, firearms, landlord-tenant policy, housing, and technology/privacy concerns. The chair noted there were already 34 bills assigned to the committee and expected more, and said the committee would likely continue to have a heavy workload this session. The chair also outlined how the committee would operate: meetings would generally be on Wednesdays, with possible Mondays as needed; hearings would not require a quorum, but executive sessions would; and members were asked to provide updated phone numbers and email addresses, especially cell numbers. He explained that the committee would continue its practice of seating members in a mixed partisan arrangement to encourage communication, and that the new clerk had joined the committee. A significant portion of the meeting focused on procedures for executive sessions and meeting times. The chair said the committee would follow the traditional rule allowing executive sessions on bills heard that day if proper notice was given, but he would avoid taking up controversial matters without full attendance. Members then discussed whether meetings should start at 9, 9:30, or 10 a.m., with concerns raised about long commutes, evening obligations, and winter driving after dark. No formal vote was taken in the portion provided, but the chair indicated he would try to accommodate the committee’s preference while balancing the workload.