Transcript Highlights:

• And to get to that point, it would take us a lot of research.
• , we'd be looking at hiring at least one person, you know, kind of off the bat to even start the research
• </c><00:27:30.480><c> might</c><00:27:30.720><c> allow</c><00:27:30.960><c> you</c> some of the research
• might allow you some of the research might allow you then<00:27:31.440><c> to</c><00:27:31.600><c> be
• </c> as well that we can use to to research as well that we can use to to research this<00:42:10.400>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Unfortunately, that is a bit beyond my resources at the moment in terms of doing some of that research
• is a little doing some of that research is a little bit<00:42:45.200><c> beyond</c><00:42:45.839><c>
• Is that a topic of interest to the task force that research support?
• Is that a topic of interest to the task force that research support? Uh,<01:26:32.719><c> Mr.
• </c> force that research force that research support?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• They had received that for this research paper they did on artificial intelligence.
• Thank you. one of their research papers uh one of their research papers uh as<00:01:40.560><c> a</c><
• /c><00:01:44.320><c> that</c><00:01:44.799><c> this</c><00:01:45.280><c> uh</c><00:01:45.520><c> research
• </c> had received for that this uh research had received for that this uh research paper<00:01:46.240
• I've done research on their facility.

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call- 00:00:03 Approve Minutes from July 10, 2025- 00:02:41 Statewide Emergency Responder Voice System Testimony- 00:03:38 Investment of State Funds- 00:46:13 Department of Juvenile Justice Update- 1:11:34 Adjournment- 1:54:08, 958, all

Summary: The committee opened with roll call, welcomed a new member, approved the July meeting minutes, and then took up testimony on the statewide emergency responder voice system, also described as the state police radio system replacement project. John Hicks, secretary of the governor’s executive cabinet and state budget director, testified that the project is unusually complex because it combines multiple IT replacements, land acquisition, and tower construction. He said the existing system dates to the early 1970s and that the administration is treating the project as a priority, with work proceeding in phases and weekly coordination among the Justice Cabinet, Kentucky State Police, and Finance and Administration Cabinet. Hicks said the project has already spent about $110 million, with nearly 1,900 portable radios acquired, microwave replacement completed at 56 sites and underway at 76 more, and routers, switches, and network upgrades addressed. He explained that because the State Police are not set up to handle real property work, the administration brought in outside real property consulting vendors through an RFP, and three vendors are now qualified to help identify and negotiate sites. He said the goal is to speed up land acquisition and tower construction while the State Police continue the technology work, and he emphasized that the project is intended to close coverage gaps for state police first and later benefit local governments and other first responders. Members of the committee expressed concern about the project’s cost and pace. Representative Petri noted that about $218.8 million has been authorized since 2018 and questioned whether the project could stretch into 2030 or later, asking what more the General Assembly could do to help. Representative Blandon also raised concerns about the long timeline and the risk of the project becoming another costly, delayed infrastructure effort, while asking when the vendor RFP was completed and whether any sites had been acquired since then. Representative Sharp asked whether there was a detailed plan and timeline, and Hicks responded that the technology side is well defined but the property acquisition side must proceed site by site because each location depends on ownership, access, power, and other factors. Hicks said the west-to-east phasing has been a smart approach and that the executive branch should improve performance to beat the current timeline expectations.

Transcript Highlights:

• on where our programs little um research on where our programs are<00:36:39.280><c> standing</c><00:
• And so we talk about that research quite a bit in the foundation for action report.
• And so we talk about that research quite a bit in the foundation for action report.
• And so we talk about that research quite a bit in the foundation for action report.
• And so we talk about that research quite a bit in the foundation for action report.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from its July 30, 2025 meeting. Members then heard a presentation from Roger McCann of the Department for Community Based Services on Kentucky’s 2026-2027 Community Services Block Grant state plan. He explained that the federally funded grant, now about $12 million annually, is distributed through 23 local community action agencies that use flexible funds for locally identified needs such as housing, nutrition, transportation, Head Start, and domestic violence services. McCann said the plan is submitted every two years and that the agencies served about 264,000 Kentuckians and 130,000 families in 2024. Senator Meredith asked whether there was a central place to review local projects, and McCann said regular reports exist and could be shared with members. The committee then approved the CSBG state plan by roll call vote. After that, members received an update on Kentucky’s state-designated domestic violence shelter programs from Angela Yanelli of ZeroV, Mary Foley of Maryman House Domestic Crisis Center, and Elizabeth Martin of the Center for Women and Families. The presenters described ZeroV’s role as the statewide domestic violence coalition, its 15 member programs across all area development districts, and its contract with the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to provide emergency shelter, supportive services, housing assistance, and batterers intervention programming. They emphasized that services are available 24/7 and are trauma-informed, with a strong focus on children and family support. The domestic violence providers reported high demand and rising costs. ZeroV said its network served more than 14,000 adults and children in fiscal year 2025, including nearly 900 children in shelter and more than 500 in outreach, while Maryman House reported operating at 90-92% capacity, with 53 households waiting for emergency shelter and 63 more waiting for intake. Maryman House also described an 8-unit transitional housing complex and plans for a 48-unit apartment complex if tax credit funding is approved. The Center for Women and Families highlighted school-readiness support for children, tutoring, counseling, and family services, including back-to-school supplies and rights information for homeless students. No additional votes or formal actions were taken during the domestic violence presentations.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:26:01.440><c> Senator</c><00:26:01.840><c> Papus,</c><00:26:03.159><c> $250,000</c> Research
• Senator Papus, $250,000 Research Center.
• And then under planning and research, line 85 is a trunk highway fund appropriation of $6 million in
• Line 87 is a one-time trunk highway fund appropriation of $150,000 for autonomous mower research and
• ,</c> And then under planning and research, And then under planning and research, line<01:47:21.040><

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• When this bill was introduced, I then started doing my research.
• my research I called Wilmer<00:42:23.520><c> and</c><00:42:23.640><c> I</c><00:42:23.760><c> said</c
• We probably have some research to do. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, Mr.
• We probably have some research to do.
• We probably have some research to do. Representative Jones, yeah, thank you. Mr.

Bills: HF845

Committee: House Energy Finance and Policy

Keywords: net metering, distributed generation, solar energy, rooftop solar, renewable energy, utility rates, electric cooperatives, municipal utilities, public utilities, Public Utilities Commission, net billing, bill credits, cost of service study, standby charge, qualifying facility, energy policy, clean energy, customer generation, interconnection, Minnesota Statutes 216B.164

Transcript Highlights:

• memorandum from uh Davis Allen our memorandum from uh Davis Allen our committee<00:05:20.600><c> researcher
• thank</c><00:05:21.360><c> you</c><00:05:21.479><c> very</c><00:05:21.639><c> much</c> committee researcher
• thank you very much committee researcher thank you very much sir<00:05:22.039><c> he's</c><00:05:22.199
• appreciate we thank you for that memo appreciate that<00:05:30.639><c> good</c><00:05:31.160><c> research
• I know I have seen that specifically, so I need to do some research on that.

Committee: House Election Law

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, but I'm also wondering whether this is something that should be more researched by the solid waste
• working group as opposed to a study committee. >> And maybe we can take the research that they come
• Um, but I'm also wondering whether this is something that should be more researched by the solid waste
• working group as opposed to a study committee. >> And maybe we can take the research that they come
• group as opposed to a study committee. >> And maybe we can take the research that they come up with

Committee: House Environment and Agriculture

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Environmental Policy Subcommittee took up HB 1621, which would require a baseline environmental impact study before development of certain manufacturing and storage facilities. Members said the concept had merit, but they could not resolve major drafting and implementation issues, including how to define covered facilities, what the study would require, and how enforcement would work at the municipal or county level. Several members expressed concern about unintended consequences and said the proposal was not ready; the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend inexpedient to legislate (ITL), and the full committee later adopted that recommendation on a 16-0 roll call vote, placing the bill on consent. The committee then discussed HB 1053, involving electronically submitted pesticide use reports. Representative Comtois presented an amendment creating a department database and protecting confidential information, but said she still needed to check whether it was germane and to review administrative issues with the Department of Agriculture. After hearing from David Russo of the Division of Pesticide Control, the committee agreed to continue work on the amendment and took no action that day. The committee also reviewed HB 1186 on egg labeling and producer exemptions. Representative Comtois offered an amendment exempting small producers from most requirements except labeling, but Commissioner Sean Jasper asked for more time to review the impact and suggested the state might not need the existing egg law at all if federal USDA rules already cover the field. Members agreed to hold action until the following week. Finally, the committee began discussion of HB 1780 on penalties for violations involving seeds, plants, and nursery stock, focusing on labeling rules and germination-date requirements; testimony from industry and department representatives indicated they were working toward a compromise that would allow multiple relabelings, add production dates, and set a 36-month sale limit, but no final action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• I have not done outside research into whether those statutes were upheld by their Supreme Courts, but
• </c><02:27:50.240><c> what</c> seek help let alone to research what seek help let alone to research what
• </c><02:29:19.840><c> this</c> organizations have also researched this organizations have also researched
• </c><02:31:38.080><c> into</c> accountable I've done some research into accountable I've done some research
• </c> there are certainly you know research there are certainly you know research takes<04:03:18.040><

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You can do the research, or I can show you my research, and I don't have a problem if we do it and we
• or I can not you can do the research or I can show<00:19:50.880><c> you</c><00:19:51.039><c> my</c><
• 00:19:51.240><c> research</c><00:19:51.840><c> and</c><00:19:51.960><c> I</c><00:19:52.039><c> don't<
• /c><00:19:52.240><c> have</c><00:19:52.360><c> a</c> show you my research and I don't have a show you
• I haven’t done that research yet, so I want to do it right.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Commerce Committee opened a public hearing on House Bill 310, sponsored by Representative Keith Ammon, which would create a study commission to develop a legal framework for stable tokens and tokenized real-world assets. Ammon described stable tokens as blockchain-based digital tokens backed by U.S. dollars or treasuries, and tokenized real-world assets as representations of ownership in items such as gold, real estate, or artwork. He said the bill is intended to help New Hampshire get ahead of emerging financial markets while waiting to see how federal legislation develops. Committee members asked about the purpose of the bill, the difference between this proposal and Bitcoin, whether state regulation could be preempted by federal law, and whether the commission could be balanced and avoid becoming a vehicle for fraud or money laundering. Ammon said the proposal is blockchain-agnostic, could apply to multiple networks, and is meant to regulate asset-backed tokens rather than create a state-issued coin. He emphasized that the state would not be guaranteeing the underlying assets, but would set rules requiring audits, proof of reserves, and honest representation of backing, with the Secretary of State’s securities office involved in oversight. Several members raised concerns about the risks of stablecoins, including money laundering, tax evasion, and possible harm to the dollar or confusion about whether the state was endorsing a new currency. Ammon responded that the bill would not undermine the dollar and argued that tokenization could actually expand demand for U.S. currency by making it easier to use globally. He also said the state would not be in the business of weighing assets or directly valuing them, only ensuring a valid audit trail and one-to-one backing. The discussion ended with general agreement that the subject is complex and that a commission could help develop future legislation, but no vote or final action was taken in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• I question for House Research: What is the total allocation for LGAs in the state?
• Um I I question for<00:43:32.240><c> for</c><00:43:32.440><c> House</c><00:43:32.720><c> Research.
• </c> for for House Research. for for House Research.
• Who pays for the research that discovers the drugs they sell? The people.
• </c><01:21:30.200><c> drugs</c><01:21:30.800><c> they</c> research that discovers the drugs they research

Committee: House Taxes

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• One thing that we know from research<00:14:56.680><c> is</c><00:14:56.920><c> that</c><00:14:57.200><
• that the mental health of research is that the mental health of our<00:14:58.400><c> staff</c><00:14
• And we are also the ones keeping up on the research, the new toolkits coming out.
• </c> it was interesting in your research it was interesting in your research around<00:43:36.960><c>
• We will join you in the efforts on corroborating research and data points. Wonderful.

Committee: Senate Education Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Concurrent Resolution 9, Senator Meredith, a concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Research
• </c> directing the Legislative Research directing the Legislative Research Commission<00:06:39.280><c
• c> real</c><00:28:40.480><c> world</c> Decades of research and real world Decades of research and real
• House Bill 2 is the culmination of hours and hours of detailed research and evaluation.
• House Bill 2 is the culmination of hours and hours of detailed research and evaluation.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 09.039><c> that</c><00:27:09.360><c> prices</c> researchers have have shown that prices researchers have
• Next, Alicia Plemens, Regulatory Research Center, providing comments.
• Next, Alicia Plemens, Regulatory Research Center, providing comments.
• Next, Alicia Plemens, Regulatory Research Center, providing comments.
• </c> Plemens Regulatory Research Center Plemens Regulatory Research Center providing<00:46:09.440><c>

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several health-related measures, with most of the discussion focused on bills addressing tobacco/vape enforcement, psychology licensure, hospital price transparency, prior authorization, and medical cannabis. The chair opened by explaining the one-minute testimony limit and that written testimony had been reviewed. For SB 2175 on disposable electronic smoking devices, the Department of Health said the bill’s placement in litter-control law was not a good fit because disposable e-cigarettes contain hazardous materials like lithium and nicotine, but it supported the intent and pointed to a related measure. Public health and tobacco-control advocates strongly supported the bill, citing youth use, toxic waste, battery fires, and the need to tighten definitions and remove exemptions; a long list of organizations and individuals were noted in support, with no opposition mentioned. For SB 2410, which would create a state directory and enforcement tools for authorized e-cigarette products, the Attorney General’s office strongly supported the measure and said it would help enforce the FDA-authorized list of products through certification, inspections, and civil penalties. The Department of Health said thousands of illegal products remain on the market and cited youth usage rates, while public health groups also supported the bill. One tobacco industry-related witness was noted in opposition. SB 2080, the psychology interjurisdictional compact, drew support from the Department of Corrections, which said it had severe staffing shortages and that the compact would help fill gaps, especially for forensic psychology and neighbor island facilities. Some committee members raised concerns about whether the compact would loosen licensure standards and reduce licensing revenue, and the Board of Psychology was said to be meeting and had not taken a formal position; testimony also noted the need for resources if the compact were adopted. The committee also heard SB 2276 on surgical assistance, with DCCA in opposition and a supporter from the field, but little discussion followed. SB 2277 on hospital price transparency drew support from consumer and patient advocates, who argued that clearer pricing would reduce medical debt and help patients shop for care; DCCA and the Department of Health offered comments, with the department suggesting an alternative enforcement model using outside review entities and noting that implementation would require significant staffing and funding. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, saying federal transparency rules already cover the issue and state law could create duplication. SB 2282 on prior authorization received comments from insurers and providers; HMSA asked that the bill be set aside pending the report of the prior authorization working group created by Act 151, while the Hawaii Medical Association said prior authorization is a major burden but deferred to regulators on resources. Finally, SB 2413 on medical cannabis was supported by the Office of Medical Cannabis and others, who said the bill would close a patient-access gap by allowing viable seed sales; one witness suggested clarifying jurisdictional language and allowing dispensaries to sell seeds to each other. The committee then began SB 2425 on health insurance, where an addiction treatment provider testified that insurers’ refusal to honor assignment-of-benefits payments can delay reimbursement and create relapse risk for patients, but the transcript cuts off before further action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• that, you looking at other states, and that makes me think of another point, and I was doing some research
• that, you looking at other states, and that makes me think of another point, and I was doing some research
• that, you looking at other states, and that makes me think of another point, and I was doing some research
• last night for the states that research last night for the states that did<00:15:41.079><c> have</c>
• I don't have that number off the top of my mind, but I can see if we can do some research and dig and

Committee: House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• on grain and hops which are research on grain and hops which are important<00:34:42.639><c> to</c><00
• I own a leg of research and government affairs business here in St.
• I own a leg of research and government affairs business here in St.
• One of our researchers here. Representative Van Binsbergen, go ahead, sir.
• researchers here representative<01:28:10.760><c> V</c><01:28:10.920><c> binsbergen</c><01:28:11.480>

Bills: HF1262 , HF1741 , HF472 , HF1668 , HF2055 , HF1786 , HF1876 , HF1089 , HF1121 , HF509 , HF1545 , HF2027 , HF642

Committee: House Commerce Finance and Policy

Keywords: food truck, liquor license, temporary license, community events, catering, municipal regulations, food hall, St. Louis Park, on-sale, intoxicating beverages, food vendors, common seating area, HF472, Mankato, Minnesota State University Mankato, MSU Mankato, Taylor Center, special liquor license, on-sale wine license, malt liquor license

Transcript Highlights:

• And basically, it's just going off of a fair amount of research that's been done that, as you think about
• It's possible there were changes in the years prior to that that I didn't come up in my research.
• I'm not sure if you have done the research, but if I understand the reduction in income tax question
• North Carolina, and in particular the Research Triangle and Charlotte, are a really interesting proxy
• I’m the Director of Research and Analysis for the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on two proposed ballot initiatives: one to reduce the state personal income tax rate from 5% to 4% over three years, and another to revise the state’s tax collection cap/62F process so it would be based on prior-year collections plus wage growth and include surtax revenue. The committee chair and House co-chair outlined the hearing process, and the first witness was Doug Howgate of the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation, who testified as the committee’s subject-matter expert on both measures. He said the income tax proposal would lower taxes broadly but would reduce state revenue by about $5.4 billion when fully implemented, with an estimated $800 million hit in FY27, and he discussed possible effects on competitiveness, taxpayer savings, and public finances. On the 62F proposal, he said the revised cap would make refunds more likely, could have produced several large refunds in recent years, and would reduce stabilization fund deposits and constrain recovery after recessions. Committee members questioned Howgate about competitiveness, outmigration, prior tax ballot measures, spending growth, MassHealth, and the interaction between the income tax and surtax. He emphasized that taxes are only one part of the state’s overall competitiveness and that housing, public services, and other factors also matter. He also noted that the surtax is constitutionally restricted but can still support ongoing spending choices. After his testimony, the committee moved to the proponents’ panel. Proponents of both initiatives, including representatives from Taxpayers for an Affordable Massachusetts, the National Federation of Independent Business, Pioneer Institute, and the Mass Opportunity Alliance, argued that the measures would improve affordability, help retain residents and businesses, and support job growth. They cited polling support, outmigration, small-business reinvestment, and comparisons to lower-tax states such as North Carolina. Their economist, Rebecca Paxton, said her model showed smaller revenue losses than critics claim and projected that the revised revenue cap would not create additional annual revenue losses while producing more regular taxpayer refunds. Committee members pressed the panel on competitiveness, prior ballot initiative implementation, and whether the measures would actually address broader affordability pressures; the hearing ended with the committee continuing to take questions from the proponents.

Transcript Highlights:

• The board office received no comment; however, an attorney with the Bureau of Legislative Research, Grant
• And Grant Wise from the Bureau of Legislative Research was very helpful.
• Grant Wise from the Bureau of Legislative Research was very helpful.
• Thank you. grant wise from the Bureau of Legislative Research was very helpful.
• We received no public comments, but I did have one comment from the Bureau of Legislative Research.

Committee: All ALC-ADMINISTRATIVE RULES

Summary: The Administrative Rules Subcommittee reviewed a long agenda of agency rules, with most items approved without objection after brief presentations and no public comment. Early items included Department of Energy and Environment rules on landfill post-closure trust fund spending thresholds and liquefied petroleum gas standards, DFA’s electronic odometer disclosure rule, and several Department of Health rules covering ionizing radiation, mobile home and RV parks, lead-based paint, counseling board revisions, hearing instrument dispensers, athletic training, dental examiners, nursing, pharmacy, medical board, speech-language pathology and audiology, radiologic technology, massage therapy, community health workers, doula certification, and cosmetology/body art. Most of these changes were described as updates to match recent acts, federal standards, compact participation, fee adjustments, or cleanup/clarification, and the committee repeatedly approved them without objection. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on the Arkansas State Board of Nursing’s broad set of rule changes implementing multiple 2025 acts. Those changes included creating a dialysis patient care technician registry, updating contact information requirements, expanding APRN authority to delegate certain tasks, clarifying death certificate and pronouncement authority, allowing substitution of therapeutically equivalent medications, permitting purchase of compounded products, and updating certified medication assistant rules and training standards. Members asked detailed questions about the meaning of therapeutically equivalent substitutions, delegation limits, compounded products, and how often medication lists would be updated; the board said it would review rules annually and use future rulemaking as needed. The committee also approved new nursing rules for declaratory orders and the new dialysis registry. The Department of Education’s rules drew the most discussion, especially the Arkansas Children’s Educational Freedom Account Program. The department said the revisions, based on Act 920 of 2025, were intended to add guardrails, clarify eligible expenses, and streamline approvals. Changes included defining core educational expenses, limiting sports-related spending, adding an intentional misuse standard, restricting certain technology purchases and requiring extra justification over $1,000, capping carryover funds at $8,500, and creating a reconsideration process for denied expenses. Members raised concerns about oversight, appeal timelines, sports equipment, provider credentialing, and whether the rules were too restrictive; department officials said the rules were meant to protect taxpayer funds while preserving flexibility, and they noted the program had received extensive public comment. The committee also approved Education rules for scholarships, residency classification, teacher programs, accelerated learning, and graduate medical education, as well as Labor and Licensing rules on wage and hour standards, boiler rules, motor vehicle commission requirements, professional wrestling regulation, appraiser qualifications, and military recruiting incentives.

Transcript Highlights:

• And basically, it's just going off of a fair amount of research that's been done that, as you think about
• It's possible there were changes in the years prior to that that I didn't come up in my research.
• I'm not sure if you have done the research, but if I understand the reduction in income tax question
• North Carolina, and in particular the Research Triangle and Charlotte, are a really interesting proxy
• I’m the Director of Research and Analysis for the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.

Bills: H5006 , H5007

Committee: Joint Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions

Keywords: tax revenue, state surplus, taxpayer refunds, budget growth, Massachusetts General Laws, income tax, tax reduction, state law, personal income tax, tax rates

Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on two proposed ballot initiatives: one to reduce the state personal income tax rate from 5% to 4% over three years, and another to revise the state tax collection cap law (62F) so the cap would be based on the prior year’s actual collections plus wage-and-salary growth and would include surtax revenue. Committee chairs outlined the hearing process and noted that the measures would need additional signatures to qualify for the 2026 ballot if not enacted by the legislature. The committee’s expert witness, Doug Howgate of the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation, said the income tax proposal would lower the base rate in stages beginning in 2027 and would ultimately reduce state income tax collections by about $5.4 billion annually when fully implemented. He estimated savings would vary by income level, from a few hundred dollars for lower- and middle-income households to about $10,700 for taxpayers at the surtax threshold. He argued the proposal would improve tax competitiveness but would also require major budget adjustments, likely including reserve use, spending cuts, and possibly new revenue measures; he cited prior downturns and said the state’s rainy day fund is stronger than in past recessions, though spending growth and health care costs remain concerns. On the 62F proposal, he said rebasing the cap to prior-year collections would make refunds more likely, with modeled refunds totaling about $7.9 billion without the surtax and $10.1 billion with it over the last decade, and warned it could reduce stabilization fund deposits and constrain recovery after recessions. Proponents of both petitions, including representatives from Taxpayers for an Affordable Massachusetts, NFIB, Pioneer Institute, and the Mass Opportunity Alliance, argued that Massachusetts faces an affordability and competitiveness crisis and that lower taxes would help families, small businesses, job creation, and outmigration. They said the income tax cut would put about $1,300 a year back into the hands of average families, help pass-through businesses reinvest, and improve the state’s ability to compete with lower-tax states such as North Carolina. Their economist, Rebecca Paxton, presented a model projecting average annual revenue losses of about $680 million during the phase-in and a total net income tax revenue impact of $2 billion to $2.2 billion, while saying long-term revenue growth would be stronger after implementation. The hearing ended with committee questions and a brief dispute over a planned voter testimonial video, which the chairs said was not appropriate for the hearing at that point.

Transcript Highlights:

• And basically, it's just going off of a fair amount of research that's been done that, as you think about
• It's possible there were changes in the years prior to that that I didn't come up in my research.
• I'm not sure if you have done the research, but if I understand the reduction in income tax question
• North Carolina, and in particular the Research Triangle and Charlotte, are a really interesting proxy
• I'm the Director of Research and Analysis for the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.

Bills: H5006 , H5007

Committee: Joint Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions

Keywords: tax revenue, state surplus, taxpayer refunds, budget growth, Massachusetts General Laws, income tax, tax reduction, state law, personal income tax, tax rates, 1212, all