Transcript Highlights:

• So I think what training programs.
• </c> wanting to know is this program wanting to know is this program beneficial?
• Every library has a summer reading<00:45:19.359><c> program.</c> reading program. reading program.
• . programs. programs.
• people that attended programs.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Interim Joint Committee on State Government met for its first meeting and heard a presentation from the Kentucky Center for Statistics (KY Stats) by Executive Director Matt Barry and Legislative Director Calli Arnold. The presentation reviewed KY Stats’ statutory background, its evolution from KESUS, its board membership, and its role in housing Kentucky’s longitudinal data system and labor market information office. Barry explained that KY Stats links data from multiple state sources, validates and cleans it, deidentifies it, and uses it to produce reports, evaluations, and responses to data requests for policymakers, practitioners, and the public. Barry described the scale of the system, noting more than 6,000 active data elements, 178 unique file types, and data from 48 sources across 26 agencies. He highlighted the agency’s privacy and security practices, including separate servers for source data and deidentified reporting data, and said KY Stats does not use real-time data. He also outlined the types of reports produced, including the annual high school feedback report and a recent life outcomes report tracking the 2017 public high school cohort’s postsecondary education, completion, wages, and employment outcomes. Members asked about the timeliness and availability of data, especially SNAP and Medicaid information, and Barry said most data arrive annually or quarterly and that Medicaid data had been used in a limited one-time project rather than as an ongoing feed. Questions also focused on artificial intelligence; Barry said KY Stats has not integrated AI but is exploring it cautiously because of privacy and security concerns. Several members encouraged further work with AI tools, while Barry emphasized that any use would need to protect confidentiality. The committee also discussed staffing and funding, with Barry saying KY Stats has about 49 total staff and annual funding of roughly $3.1 million in state general funds, plus federal labor-related funding. Committee members praised the agency’s work and suggested legislators may not fully understand its capabilities. No votes or formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Looking at the programs like the hands program that go into the homes and work with families, so there
• </c> to stress that this is a pilot program. to stress that this is a pilot program.
• Looking at the programs like the hands program<00:03:30.239><c> that</c><00:03:30.560><c> go</c><00:
• >> They would, and looking at programs like the hands program, those programs that go in home and any
• ,</c><00:26:41.520><c> um</c> pilot program as a pilot program, um pilot program as a pilot program,

Committee: Senate Families & Children

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The LFC recommended the Community Solar Program.
• Oh, and the River Stewardship Program on Line 164.
• The previous Iteration of the program didn't do that, so we threw it out and we wrote a program that
• We've also seen a 50% enrollment increase in those programs.
• Programs with nearly 800 individuals enrolled in FY25.

Committee: Senate Senate Finance

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> faculty and staff responsive programming faculty and staff responsive programming and<00:08:26.879
• another program?
• The student-to-faculty ratio in a program versus another program?
• the demand for those programs.
• the demand for those programs.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee met to review the annual report on collaboration between the University System of New Hampshire and the Community College System of New Hampshire, and the meeting began with approval of the prior minutes and a gubernatorial proclamation recognizing the community college system’s 80th anniversary. Both chancellors praised the proclamation and described the report as a statutory follow-up to the public higher education task force. They said the two systems have built a close working relationship and that the collaboration is intended to continue, though progress may be limited by resources and staffing changes. Much of the discussion focused on transfer pathways and new academic models. The chancellors said House Bill 1530 helped drive the creation of more than 100, and possibly about 130, “universal pathways” between the systems, with a reported 30% increase in community college associate-degree graduates transferring to the university system in the last academic year. They also discussed direct-admit outreach for community college graduates, early college and CTE-to-workforce pathways, and the development of three-year bachelor’s programs at Plymouth State and in some health-care fields. Members asked about nursing, allied dental health, and radiologic technology, and the chancellors said they are exploring whether some programs can be streamlined, while noting that nursing’s requirements may limit how short a pathway can be. Members also raised concerns about whether transfer pathways could affect university enrollment, but the university chancellor said declining enrollment is more likely due to a smaller pool of college-age students and broader competition, not the transfer programs. Another topic was the ERP/technology platform recommendation from the task force: the university system is moving to Workday, while the community college system is working to align business practices and move from an on-premises system to a cloud-based solution. Officials said a shared enterprise system could create efficiencies in the future, but it is not expected in the short term; student-facing tools like Canvas are already shared. The committee also discussed House Bill 112, which would require passing a civics test for graduation, and the chancellors said they support civic education but see implementation challenges. No votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the minutes and receiving the report.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, we do have a federal food program.
• food program there are two the federal food program there are two tiers<00:05:12.280><c> there's</c>
• We... the food program.
• <c> had</c><00:06:31.599><c> the</c> we M the food program I had the we M the food program I had the
• I wrote the program I'm with.

Committee: House Children and Families Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• That's mandatory for the program.
• These folks are typically not included in a lot of federal programs and a lot of state programs.
• And these folks are typically not included in a lot of federal programs and a lot of state programs.
• We are urging continued investment in key programs and improving programs, like the ones that we've already
• And some of those programs, and I'm going to talk particularly about one program from CEFA, are really

Summary: The hearing focused on inclusive economic development in California’s Central Valley, with the chair describing prior state and federal investments in Fresno and the region, including Transformative Climate Communities funding, the Southwest Fresno Community College campus, affordable housing and infrastructure projects, medical education pathways, F3 Farm Food Future, and high-speed rail-related jobs. The chair emphasized that rural and historically disinvested communities often face complex application processes and limited technical capacity, and said the committee’s goal was to learn from successful local models and identify ways to better direct resources to communities that need them most. The first panel featured representatives from the Sierra Health Foundation, the James Irvine Foundation, and UC Merced. Chet Hewitt argued that health and economic opportunity are inseparable and described Sierra Health’s economic development portfolio, including the San Joaquin Valley Health Fund, the Impact Investment Fund, and the Community Economic Mobilization Initiative (CEMI), which together support healthier workplaces, microbusiness financing, and nonprofit capacity. Jessica Kaksmarik said Irvine’s place-based grantmaking in inland regions aims to strengthen worker and community power, support community-led development, and expand equitable pathways to mobility, while stressing that philanthropy must partner with government because it cannot meet the scale of need alone. Dr. Manuel Pastor and Dr. Ed Flores both argued that inequality and extractive development weaken long-term growth, and that community organizations need both power-building and technical expertise to influence regional planning; Flores also described the Valley Seed project and high-road economic development models that link labor, climate, and community benefits. The second panel highlighted community-based programs and the effects of unstable funding. Yolanda Randalls described the Sweet Potato Project at West Fresno Family Resource Center, a youth agriculture and entrepreneurship program that combines hands-on farming, business training, and mental health support; she said participants improved from a 1.9 GPA to a 3.3 GPA and that the program is seeking long-term support as its funding nears expiration. Addie Carr of Neighborhood Industries described a second-chance employment model that provides job training, case management, literacy and life coaching, and small no-interest loans, and said CEMI helped the organization open a second store and create more jobs. Maria Redoubt Orozco of Community Alliance with Family Farmers said small farmers are central to the Valley’s economy but face land, water, climate, and market barriers, and warned that federal cuts to programs like Local Food Purchasing Assistance threaten local food systems. Daniela Rodriguez of Immigrants Rising described entrepreneurship and technical assistance for undocumented and mixed-status entrepreneurs, including the SEED initiative, and said policy uncertainty and access-to-capital barriers continue to constrain immigrant economic mobility. In closing discussion, panelists repeatedly called for longer-term, braided, and flexible funding rather than one-time grants, and the chair noted the need to continue supporting community-defined practices and public-private partnerships.

Transcript Highlights:

• , enrollees, and the counties that administer the programs.
• The agenda also asked a lot about the CalAIM and CARE program.
• The agenda also asked a lot about the CalA and Care program.
• , so counties don't have funds to reestablish those programs.
• These county indigent care programs are not easy to stand up overnight.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight held a hearing on how H.R. 1’s new federal work and community engagement rules will affect Medi-Cal and CalFresh, especially for Californians with behavioral health needs, people experiencing homelessness, and justice-involved individuals. The Legislative Analyst’s Office outlined the scope of the changes, including Medi-Cal work requirements beginning in January 2027 and CalFresh changes beginning in June 2026, and estimated large potential coverage losses if people cannot document exemptions or comply with reporting rules. State departments said they are still awaiting some federal guidance but are already building implementation plans, data matching, outreach campaigns, and system changes to reduce disruption and automatically identify exemptions where possible. Department of Health Care Services and Department of Social Services officials described efforts to use existing data, CalSAWS, and cross-program coordination to streamline exemption screening, including for medical frailty, serious mental illness, substance use disorders, and student status. They said outreach will include text messaging, webinars, county training, and community-based partners, while also acknowledging that many people will still need direct worker contact. County representatives stressed that the new rules will create major administrative burdens, require significant new staffing, and could lead to coverage loss if counties are not adequately funded. They urged the Legislature to release the $20 million in current-year General Fund for CalFresh implementation and to consider a much larger county augmentation next year. Assembly members pressed the administration on outreach strategy, county funding, consistency across counties, and how to avoid harming eligible people through overly aggressive implementation. They also asked about coordination with universities, CDCR, and community-based organizations, and about how exemptions would be documented for mental health and substance use conditions. Department officials said they are working with counties, education institutions, and correctional agencies, and that they are trying to align Medi-Cal and CalFresh rules where possible, but not all federal definitions match. Public commenters from legal aid, counties, labor, and public hospitals warned that work requirements do not increase employment, will worsen food insecurity and health outcomes, and will strain county systems unless the state provides more funding and support.

Transcript Highlights:

• So maybe a state program. Do you know? Not the federal program anyway, so maybe a state program.
• insurance program, to the private flood insurance and the availability of that.
• Both of these programs and entities are supported by Washington DNR's community resilience programs,
• Both of these programs and entities are supported by Washington D&R's community resilience programs,
• And then lastly, back to the voluntary grant program.

Bills: HB2428 , HB2399 , HB2087

Committee: House Consumer Protection & Business

Keywords: life insurance, policy lapse, policy cancellation, nonpayment of premium, premium grace period, lapse notice, termination notice, third-party notice, third-party designee, beneficiary protection, consumer protection, insurance regulation, insurer notice requirements, policyholder, beneficiary, Washington RCW, insurance code, unintentional lapse, coverage continuation, premium delinquency

Transcript Highlights:

• Our programs are open to everyone.
• </c><00:04:16.239><c> We</c> programs are open to everyone. We programs are open to everyone.
• program or many programs animal research program or many programs and<00:21:08.720><c> leads</c><00:21
• Agronomy program.
• Program.

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> briefly pulls from a 2023 program briefly pulls from a 2023 program evaluation<00:04:55.120><c>
• The senior nutrition program is a federal program that provides meals to individuals age 60 or older,
• So in 2022 the program provided approximately 3.1 million meals to over 40,000 program participants.
• </c> over 40,000 program over 40,000 program participants<00:17:58.280><c> so</c><00:17:58.440><c> our
• </c> oversight the recertification of program oversight the recertification of program participants<00

Committee: Senate Human Services

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Open Enrollment Program indexing.
• So it's just current programs with this bill going forward.
• So, taking those programs... And that's the base year going forward.
• But was that because we didn't give the amount of dollars to the program, or was that because the program
• All right. ...funding for the state disaster assistance program. All right.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Finance

Keywords: 970, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The examples of this are are nursing program.
• One goal is to continue to work with the College out Science program in nursing programs to ensure continued
• We have a huge and strong worker workforce program here at the college and is not a program that we need
• Lastly, I want to see expanding the nursing program.
• It's higher education programs.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> program but how long was this program program but how long was this program under<00:06:55.360><
• </c> hasn't utilized this program. hasn't utilized this program.
• </c> apply for the program? apply for the program?
• </c> the program? the program?
• the program.

Bills: HB2118 , HB2473

Committee: House Economic Development & Technology

Keywords: business development, arts, cultural affairs, Hawaii, commissions, administrative transfer, funding appropriation, Hawaiian culture, sense of place, land management, environmental stewardship, cultural preservation, 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard several bills related to permitting and economic development. On HB 2603, relating to permits, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development said it supported the measure with comments. Committee discussion focused on the fact that the state’s facilitated permit process appears to have been rarely or never used, the need to identify specific projects that would use it, and whether DBEDT would need dedicated staffing to administer it. DBEDT said it had found no projects under the current process, had no capacity to run the program as structured, and estimated it would need about 7 to 9 FTEs, including permitting, coordination, data, systems, and possibly legal support. The chair suggested exploring a staff assignment and comparing the concept to federal FAST-41-style expedited permitting. On HB 2140, relating to essential permitting positions, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development again supported the bill with comments. Testimony and questioning centered on a pilot program to help counties pay competitively for permitting staff. A DBEDT representative said the issue of competitive pay affected both county and state permitting offices and that the bill was intended as a temporary pilot, though a more permanent solution would be preferable. When asked how counties would fund the salary support, the witness said that was not yet discussed with the counties and agreed to follow up. The committee also noted the bill applies to participating counties. On HB 2598, relating to the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, the State Procurement Office and HTDC offered comments, and the Department of the Attorney General raised constitutional concerns. The AG said the bill’s residency-based certification requirements, when tied to procurement, could implicate the dormant Commerce Clause, and that the required 1% contribution tied to state contracts raised unconstitutional-conditions concerns. In questioning, the AG characterized these as legal risks rather than automatic lawsuits. The committee did not take a vote. The committee then heard HB 2141, relating to state enterprise zones. Taxation, DBEDT, HCDA, the University of Hawaii Cancer Center, and HTDC testified in support, while the Tax Foundation noted the program was intended to help economically depressed areas create jobs. HTDC said the bill would help preserve the Maui Research and Technology Center’s enterprise-zone status after rezoning. Committee discussion focused on whether the enterprise zone program is being used effectively, how the bill might attract businesses to areas where the state is investing, and whether the program’s labor requirements are too burdensome for new businesses. DBEDT explained that the program requires a 10% workforce increase in the first year, which must be sustained, and said it promotes the program through county coordinators and in-person outreach. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• for the adult workforce diploma program.
• The sunset on an existing program for the adult workforce diploma program allows adults to get accredited
• for the adult workforce diploma program. the sunset on an existing program for the adult workforce diploma
• I don't have concerns about the program. No, no, no.
• And so if we don't fund it, the program goes away.

Committee: House Higher Education and Workforce Development

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , which is a federal matching program, and the manufacturing assistance program.
• . manufacturing assistance program which manufacturing assistance program which many<00:34:15.800><c>
• We’re combining B16 into one program so that way HTA will just have three programs to manage.
• from that program ID.
• There is a high-demand program.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> interface with the respective programs. interface with the respective programs.
• What programs is it um coming? What programs is it um supporting?
• and MinnesotaCare program.
• and MinnesotaCare program.
• </c> programming is impacted there. programming is impacted there.

Committee: House Ways and Means

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• But is that an optional program or is it a forced program?
• Are you aware of the program? I'm aware of the ICTT program. Yes.
• And you're aware of that program? I'm not aware of that program.
• And you're aware of that program? I'm not aware of that program.
• So to address these, prevention program and no quality assurance program.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• work program.
• We're already delivering a record work program.
• So one is the aggregate grant program.
• We can look at our work program 5 years out in the future.
• They do this on several other programs as well.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's moving nutritional programs from... All nutritional programs. Correct. So all the...
• , which included commodities, some different adult feeding programs, different programs that came in,
• But what we're pulling out in this particular program...
• Can you assure this committee that all program assets involved in the nutritional program of the state
• So the entire programs are transferring to the...

Committee: All JBC-PERSONNEL

Summary: The committee first considered the Lieutenant Governor’s Office budget and personnel request. Office representatives said they wanted to move the office to the state pay plan to better align salaries with other constitutional offices and remain competitive, noting that OPM had approved the positions and grades. Senators questioned the size of the requested increases and the office’s workload, and after discussion the motion to adopt the proposal failed on an 8-8 tie. The committee then voted to expunge that vote and returned to the regular agenda. The committee approved a series of Governor’s letters involving position transfers and appropriation adjustments across several agencies. These included changes for AETN, the Department of Health and Nursing Board/Dietetics Board, multiple DHS divisions, DFA shared services and budget management, and the Department of Public Safety shared services division. Most of these items involved moving positions and associated salary appropriations between divisions, with no major opposition and motions passing. A lengthy discussion followed on the transfer of child nutrition and related nutrition programs from the Department of Education to the Department of Agriculture. Education and DFA officials explained that the programs fit better under Agriculture because the funding and commodities are tied to USDA programs, and they clarified that both state and federal funding and all related positions would move. Senators raised concerns about the math in the letters, the split between state and federal funding, and whether all program resources were being transferred. After the explanation, the committee approved the Education side of the transfer and then approved the Agriculture companion letter. The committee also discussed the Educational Freedom Account program budget. Officials said the $309 million request matched current participation and included a $70 million reserve in case applications increase. Several senators expressed concern about the program’s growth and its effect on public education funding and adequacy, while others noted that the program’s rules and funding levels could be adjusted through the State Board and future legislative action. The committee then approved a Public Safety classification change and a member amendment changing a title at East Arkansas Community College from assistant to the president to assistant to the chancellor, with no change in positions or appropriation.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the Rural and Family Lands Protection Program is an agricultural land preservation program, and it's
• , our best management practices program, which is a water quality and water quantity program.
• So from 2001, when the program was created, to 2022, the Rural and Family Lands Protection Program acquired
• , our best management practices program, which is a water quality and water quantity program.
• So from 2001, when the program was created to 2022, the Rural and Family Lands Protection Program acquired

Summary: The Agriculture and Natural Resources Budget Committee met with a quorum and heard two Department of Agriculture presentations. First, the Director of Rural and Family Lands described the Rural and Family Lands Protection Program, which buys development rights through perpetual conservation easements on private agricultural land to preserve farming, wildlife habitat, water resources, and open space while keeping land taxable and avoiding state maintenance costs. He said the program has expanded rapidly since 2023 through streamlined applications, templates, and an online portal, increasing acreage protected from about 66,000 acres through 2022 to more than 210,000 acres, with a higher share in the Florida wildlife corridor. He also said review times were reduced by more than 85 days and that projects under $5 million can move faster under statutory authority. The department is seeking $200 million in nonrecurring funding on top of $100 million recurring, citing 203 existing projects and 224 new applications totaling nearly $2 billion in estimated need. Members asked about the scientific ranking process, South Florida participation, project prioritization, maintenance responsibilities, and whether landowners can exit the program; staff said land remains privately owned, easements are in perpetuity, and partnerships and cost-sharing are prioritized. The committee then heard from the Florida Forest Service director, who outlined the agency’s dual mission of wildfire response and land management. He said the service responds to roughly 2,200 to 2,500 wildfires annually, manages 38 state forests and one ranch totaling more than 1.1 million acres, and receives about 15 million visitors each year. He highlighted the impact of Senate Bill 1638 gaming compact funds, which provided $32 million for land management, recreation, equipment, roads, invasive species control, habitat restoration, prescribed burning, reforestation, and staffing support. He said Florida leads the nation in prescribed fire, with 277,818 acres burned on state forests last year and 2.47 million acres burned statewide, and noted ongoing restoration work such as Picayune Strand. He also described challenges including aging equipment, deferred maintenance, contractor availability, and timber market instability caused by hurricanes and mill closures, and suggested longer-term funding and a higher capital asset allowance. Members discussed timber markets, public communication and marketing, recreation fees, and coordination with other agencies and FDOT. The meeting ended with the chair noting that next week’s meeting would report out agency conversations and budget recommendations, and the committee rose.