Transcript Highlights:

• of students equipped to meet the needs of students who<00:32:15.120> need<00:32:15.440> explicit
• <00:32:16.039> instruction<00:32:16.480> in who need explicit instruction in who need
• explicit instruction in learning<00:32:16.919> to<00:32:17.399> read<00:32:18.399>
• development and embedding explicit development and embedding explicit instruction<00:32:42.080><
• We know the explicit foundational skills that students need.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On scene, I conduct mental health evaluations with several primary goals: to divert individuals from
• Non-licensed staff ask LMHCs to conduct full evaluations and complete the paperwork while someone else
• Police and clinicians could see that she was unstable, but because she wasn't making explicit threats
• needed, the bill hamstrings defendants and deprives the court of important information it needs to conduct
• Frustrated by all the delays of care I saw clinically, I conducted the first-ever IRB-approved study

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held its fourth public hearing of the 2025-2026 session on bills dealing with involuntary commitment and access to addiction treatment, especially proposals to move Section 35 civil commitments away from jails and prisons and into facilities licensed or approved by DPH or DMH. Chairs Velis and Domb framed the hearing as a discussion of how to support people in crisis with compassion, while also warning against using involuntary commitment as a way to remove unhoused people from public view. The hearing also touched on related concerns about discharge practices, treatment capacity, and the need for a broader continuum of care. Testimony split largely along two themes. Addiction researcher Keith Humphreys argued that many people enter treatment under pressure, that involuntary treatment can be ethically justified in the face of overdose risk, but that it should not be mandated unless high-quality services exist first; he emphasized the need for inpatient care when someone is a grave danger, followed by case management and outpatient support. MAMH’s Kate Alicante supported the bill, saying Massachusetts is the only state that commits people with substance use conditions to jails or prisons and that carceral settings add trauma and stigma; she pointed to prior legislative steps, including the Section 35 commission and the planned closure of DOC’s MESAC facility, as evidence that the Commonwealth is moving toward health-based settings. A major portion of the hearing focused on Stony Brook, a sheriff-run stabilization and treatment center in Hampden County. Boston City Councilor John Fitzgerald, several committee members, and multiple people in recovery described the facility as humane, well-run, and effective, with longer stays, medical monitoring, medication-assisted treatment, counseling, and warm handoffs to aftercare. Several witnesses said Stony Brook saved their lives or helped family members recover, and they argued that the sheriff’s office model should be expanded rather than eliminated. Others, including family members and advocates, countered that even a well-run correctional setting remains stigmatizing and that people should not be treated in facilities run by sheriffs or corrections when they have committed no crime. No vote was taken. The hearing concluded with continued testimony, including Senator Friedman’s support for Section 35 as a civil commitment tool but not in a criminal justice setting, and her separate support for a bill to speed inpatient mental health treatment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any conduct that disrupts our proceedings will not be permitted, and any individual who is disruptive
• The adoption of LCFS and each set of amendments to the regulation was conducted with a robust public
• So we are conducting our analysis. We opened a rulemaking.
• A study UCS conducted with the Greenlining Institute found that one of the most important things California
• However, there is not an explicit proposal in that package for workers who are already facing layoff,

Summary: The joint informational hearing of the Assembly Committees on Utilities and Energy, Transportation, and Natural Resources focused on California’s transportation fuels sector, especially the state’s response to refinery closures and the broader transition away from fossil fuels. Opening remarks emphasized the tension between climate and air-quality goals, fuel affordability, refinery jobs and local tax bases, and the need to avoid crisis-driven responses as Phillips 66 and Valero consider shutting refineries in Wilmington and Benicia. Professor Emily Grubert framed the issue as a long-term managed transition in which the public already bears much of the risk and should also capture benefits from a well-planned shift. CARB Chair Leanne Randolph reviewed the state’s emissions and fuel policies, including AB 32, the low-carbon fuel standard, clean vehicle programs, and the at-berth regulation for ocean-going vessels. She said California’s transportation sector remains the largest source of greenhouse gases and a major source of smog-forming pollution, but that the state has made substantial progress and still needs to reduce demand for fossil fuels while maintaining compliance with federal air-quality standards. Randolph also said CARB’s recent LCFS amendments had not caused the predicted spike in gas prices and explained that compliance pathways for the at-berth rule include emissions-reduction technologies or payments into a remediation fund. CEC Vice Chair Gunda described declining gasoline demand, shrinking in-state refining capacity, and growing dependence on imports, arguing that the state is in a “mid-transition” period that requires both support for legacy infrastructure and continued investment in cleaner alternatives. He outlined the administration’s petroleum market stabilization proposal, which aims to return California crude production to 125 million barrels a year through four components: codifying the ban on fracking, validating the Kern County oil-and-gas permitting ordinance, creating a temporary CEQA exemption paired with a two-for-one plug-and-drill framework, and strengthening pipeline and spill-safety requirements. Department of Conservation Director Jennifer Lucasey said the proposal is intended to stabilize crude supply and pipeline throughput while preserving health and environmental protections, and noted that CalGEM would still review permits and enforce other requirements. Mayor Steve Young of Benicia testified that a Valero closure would significantly reduce city revenue and leave the community facing years of cleanup and redevelopment challenges. He said the city supports environmental protection but is worried about the economic hit, the possibility that Benicia becomes a fuel-import terminal, and the lack of local influence over refinery decisions. Members pressed the panel on the CEQA exemption, tribal and habitat review, disclosure of closure liabilities, fuel-demand projections, and whether the proposal should include more demand-side measures. No formal votes were taken; the hearing was informational, and officials said some proposals, including a margin-cap pause and further transition planning, would be taken up later in the process.

Transcript Highlights:

• However, the Texans Open Meetings Act is not currently Provide explicit authority for internal auditors
• dangerous and makes governmental entities more susceptible to cyberattacks. body is not required to conduct
• The standards even give guidance on how to conduct risk assessments.
• Includes conducting meetings in a manner intended to conceal deliberations from the public, failing to
• The key provisions of House Bill 3770 requires that the LBB conduct periodic efficiency reviews of state

Bills: HB512, HB2248, HB2679, HB2832, HB3112, HB3368, HB3490, HB3512, HB3623, HB3666, HB3700, HB3711, HB3770, HB3963

Keywords: grievance procedures, state agency, employee rights, workplace regulations, employment law, employees, employment actions, appeal, state employees, workplace rights, disciplinary actions, employment conditions, employment disputes, job protections, public information, transparency, government accountability, information access, notification requirements, federal funding

Transcript Highlights:

• Additionally, we evaluate CDCR's provision of medical care by conducting medical inspections at each
• Does that trigger any special approach in terms of investigating the conduct when you're having...
• Do you have a more explicit response? Well, I agree with Warren Parker. We work with what we have.
• those inquiries, claims previously handled by low. investigators who conducted those inquiries.
• This team will conduct face-to-face meetings with claimants monthly.

Summary: The hearing focused first on sexual abuse, harassment, and retaliation in California’s women’s prisons, with testimony from CDCR wardens, the Office of Inspector General, advocacy groups, and formerly incarcerated survivors. Legislators and witnesses described a pattern of staff misconduct, fear of retaliation, gaps in reporting, and the need for stronger accountability, better investigations, and more outside access for survivor support organizations. CDCR said it has expanded training, body-worn and stationary cameras, outside partnerships, and PREA-related response procedures, while the Inspector General requested additional funding and staff to monitor more grievances and staff sexual misconduct cases under SB 1069. Members pressed CDCR on why accused staff are not always placed on leave, how cases are referred to prosecutors, and whether current protections are enough; several members argued the state should aim to investigate all complaints and do more to prevent retaliation and repeat abuse. The second issue was rehabilitative and reentry programming in women’s prisons. CDCR’s Division of Rehabilitative Programs and the wardens highlighted education, vocational training, substance use treatment, peer support, and community reentry programs, citing increased enrollment and recent graduates earning diplomas, degrees, and certifications. They said these programs are intended to reduce recidivism and improve public safety. Formerly incarcerated advocates and community providers argued that current offerings are still too limited, outdated, and not aligned with today’s job market, especially around digital literacy and transferable credentials, and they urged more funding for community-based, trauma-informed, gender-responsive programming. A coalition representative asked for a $20 million continuation and expansion of the Wright Grant program, and members discussed additional budget requests for reentry and related women’s services.

Transcript Highlights:

• without parents having explicit consent. without parents having explicit consent.
• <03:20:18.640> a applaud the exercise of conducting a applaud the exercise of conducting a
• So, this is a narrowed subpoena to the investigation that is being conducted.
• Not every code of conduct violation is going to amount to a criminal violation.
• I I I will say that is being conducted.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Examples include, not exclusive, but include children engaging in sexually explicit conduct, illegal
• of<03:27:04.560> drugs explicit conduct, illegal use of drugs explicit conduct, illegal use
• conduct or to harm themselves or to commit acts of violence or to use drugs.
• ,<04:35:05.920> would violation of the code of conduct, would violation of the code of conduct
• could be considered a code of conduct could be considered a code of conduct violation. violation

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then there are regulations that control our conduct as well, as you may remember from active duty
• And then there are regulations that control our conduct as well, as you may remember from active duty
• So given Secretary Hegseth's explicit directive to restore the warrior ethos as the foundational culture
• In fact, just in my colleague’s district, ICE conducted an operation, one that she tried to dox.”
• Why has other immigration—what on the topic of immigration enforcement conducted by ICE or conducted

Summary: The Senate Committee on Director Nominations held a confirmation hearing for John Connolly, the current Adjutant General and Director of the Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA). Connolly described his background in the Army, National Guard, and military law, and outlined DEMA’s dual mission of supporting the Arizona National Guard and emergency management. He emphasized readiness, modernization of aging aircraft and facilities, growth in capabilities such as drones and electronic warfare, partnerships to restore helicopter training at Silver Bell, and stewardship of resources. He also discussed DEMA’s border-related missions, including Task Force Safe at Nogales, counter-drug operations, and use of artificial intelligence to monitor drone activity and build a common operating picture for law enforcement. Committee members questioned Connolly about his interview and vetting process, his role in emergency management, disaster response in Gila County, support for rural counties and tribes, and services for Guard members and families through the Integrated Resilience Operations Center. Several members pressed him on military discipline, lawful orders, classified information, and the distinction between war and hostilities. Senator Rogers focused on chain of command, combat readiness, and whether Connolly’s JAG background prepared him to lead a combat-oriented force; Connolly responded that his role is to provide ready forces, follow civilian authority, and ensure troops have training, equipment, and family support. He also said he had experience advising commanders and teaching lawful versus unlawful orders. A major point of contention came when members questioned Connolly about the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination mandate for the Guard and whether he had treated it as unlawful or unconstitutional. Connolly said it was a lawful order at the time and that exemption processes existed under the regulations. The hearing also turned to immigration enforcement, emergency powers, and whether the Guard should support ICE; Connolly said the Guard is a support function and would respond to a direct request through the governor, but he could not identify a specific scenario in the abstract. No vote or final action was taken during the hearing, and the committee appeared to continue its review after testimony and questioning.

Transcript Highlights:

• notice these temporary permits for public input and objection, and specifically requires the board to conduct
• Furthermore, staff still conduct technical review and consult with agencies and tribes when concerns
• Under a full CEQA process, the requirement to conduct a CEQA analysis would fall to the local agency
• The response was that there was no explicit information on why folks would favor the 180-day permit.
• at the apple for environmental conditioning, and they added that a burrowing owl survey must be conducted

Summary: The hearing focused on oversight of AB 658 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s five-year temporary permits for groundwater recharge. Assembly Member Arambula and committee members discussed how the permits are intended to help capture high flows during wet periods, support SGMA implementation, and store water underground for later use. The State Water Board chair said the five-year permits have become an important tool, with seven five-year permits issued this season and over 43,000 acre-feet authorized, but noted that actual recharge depends on hydrology and that the board is open to improvements. Members and witnesses discussed several possible changes to make the program more effective: allowing a two-year delay before the five-year permit clock starts, codifying CEQA exemptions that have been used through executive order, and shifting from a public objection model to a public comment model to reduce delays. There was also discussion of water availability analyses, with some members asking whether the state could develop a broader statewide assessment to reduce consultant costs and make permitting more predictable. The board said such an effort would be large and costly, but could potentially save applicants money and improve consistency. District representatives described their experiences. Stockton East said the five-year permit was more cost-effective than repeated 180-day permits, but that the 90-20 methodology, consultant costs, and a burrowing owl survey condition made use difficult. Omaha-Hartnell Water District said its recharge work depends on simple, low-cost infrastructure and that five-year permits, CEQA reform, and lower upfront fees would help small districts. A consultant working with Scott Valley and Sierra Valley said five-year permits can work well in different basins, but local infrastructure, stakeholder coordination, streambed alteration agreements, and upstream flow constraints can limit recharge. Members also raised concerns about basin connectivity, downstream water rights, and the need to pair recharge with sustainable groundwater pumping and broader water storage planning.

Transcript Highlights:

• Local authorities conduct continuous monitoring of anchored boats on a daily basis.
• 2016 that you would get $0 if you engaged in a state contract and then you engaged in this type of conduct
• The panel meetings are open to the public and often conducted via teleconferences.
• Now again, whatever their school's conduct code they will still need to comply with, but they will have
• Whether it's subtle or explicit is clear, but sometimes, especially the benefit of our definitions, tries

Transcript Highlights:

• It requires emergency departments to conduct training on policies and procedures, including, at a minimum
• It requires emergency departments to conduct training on policies and procedures, including at a minimum
• It requires emergency departments to conduct the National Pediatric Readiness Assessment, created by
• Do you believe that the utilities will have the ability to conduct a robust rate study before changing
• It directs the FHFC to conduct necessary rulemaking, oversight, and...

Summary: The Florida Senate convened with a quorum, opened with a prayer and Pledge of Allegiance, and heard several member introductions recognizing guests, interns, public servants, and a resolution honoring Indiana University quarterback Fernando Mendoza for winning the Heisman Trophy. The chamber then moved to the special order calendar and took up a series of bills, with some measures temporarily postponed and others advanced after brief debate and, in several cases, substitution of House companions for Senate bills. The first major bill passed was CS/CS/HB 355 on health care patient protection, which requires hospitals with emergency departments to have pediatric emergency care policies, training, equipment, and a designated pediatric coordinator; it passed 36-0. The Senate also passed CS/HB 1113 on public records, expanding confidentiality protections for victims and temporarily protecting the name of a law enforcement officer who becomes a victim in the line of duty; it passed 33-4. CS/CS/HB 1085 on local government cybersecurity was amended to place the program under the Florida Digital Service and to adjust grant timing, then passed 37-0. CS/CS/HB 925 on clerks of court passed 38-0 after amendments affecting revenue retention, legal notices, traffic citation distributions, and municipal fee sharing. CS/CS/HB 679 on trademark registration modernization and CS/CS/HB 589 on septic permit timing also passed unanimously. The most extensive debate centered on CS/CS/HB 991 / SB 1334, an elections bill that would use Real ID data to verify citizenship, change voter ID rules, alter candidate qualifying requirements, and revise election administration procedures. Senators offered and debated numerous amendments on documentation fees, senior exemptions, human review versus automated systems, student and retirement-center IDs, and effective dates; most were defeated, though one amendment adding stock-trading disclosure language for candidates was adopted. The bill’s sponsor cited election-crimes reports and specific prosecutions involving non-citizens as justification for the measure, while opponents argued it could disenfranchise eligible voters, especially students and seniors. The transcript ends during continued questioning and debate on that elections bill, before final disposition is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• needs to be quickly said they've never dealt with the New Hampshire Constitution, which, uh, is as explicit
• needs to be quickly said they've never dealt with the New Hampshire Constitution, which, uh, is as explicit
• needs to be quickly said they've never dealt with the New Hampshire Constitution, which, uh, is as explicit
• needs to be quickly said they've never dealt with the New Hampshire Constitution, which, uh, is as explicit
• needs to be quickly said they've never dealt with the New Hampshire Constitution, which, uh, is as explicit

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Education Funding Committee met to consider eight bills, beginning with HB 443 on the terms of appointment for members of the Higher Education Commission. Department of Education Director Steve Applebee explained that the commission supported a language change to address a holdover issue, but members raised concerns that the bill did not solve the problem of inactive members and might not address the broader question of whether the commission should continue to exist. The committee agreed to retain HB 443 for further work and voted 18-0 to do so. The committee then voted on HB 137, which would allocate excess statewide education property tax funds for local school and municipal purposes. Supporters of ITL argued that using the statewide property tax to reduce the state’s school funding obligation could create a slippery slope and shift more burden to property taxpayers. The committee voted 15-3 to ITL the bill, with a minority report to be written. HB 237, which would prohibit the use of special education and differentiated aid funds on students not receiving special education services, was also ITL’d after members said federal law already governs how IDEA-related funds may be used and that the bill was unnecessary. That motion passed 16-0, with some members not voting because they were out for medical reasons. The committee next advanced HB 354, creating alternative certification pathways for career and technical education instructors. Members said the bill could help recruit qualified tradespeople and retirees to teach in CTE programs, and it was approved 18-0 and placed on the consent calendar. HB 491, establishing a committee to study alternative public education funding methods and reduce reliance on local property taxes, was retained for further study after members said the committee or a subcommittee could continue the work over the year; it passed 18-0. HB 656, concerning local school districts’ authority to accept federal grants, was also retained after discussion focused on transparency, grant conditions, and the need to avoid delays in services; it passed 18-0. The committee then moved on to HB 729, an appropriation for an attorney to recodify education laws, but the transcript cuts off before that bill was acted on.

Transcript Highlights:

• restrictions to prohibit only class three e-bikes for individuals under 15, same thing allowing explicit
• use for same thing allowing explicit use for class<01:07:19.760> one<01:07:19.920> and
• It's explicit, and I want to note that they're explicitly exempt from completing a road test requirement
• It's explicit, and I want to note that they're explicitly exempt from completing a road test requirement
• It's explicit, and I want to note that they're explicitly exempt from completing a road test requirement

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Transportation heard a 10 a.m. agenda covering a range of transportation, liability, harbor, and bicycle-related bills. Testimony was mixed on several measures: HB 263, which would exempt full-time college students from vehicle weight tax, drew opposition from the Department of Transportation and others; HB 135, authorizing general obligation bonds to purchase property on the North Shore of Oʻahu, had support; HB 860, granting immunity to the state or county for repairs on roads with disputed jurisdiction, drew support from DOT, DLNR, and the City and County of Honolulu but opposition from the Hawaii Association for Justice; and HB 996, which would abolish joint and several liability for government entities in highway-related civil actions, also drew strong opposition from the Hawaii Association for Justice and support from the Attorney General’s office and DOT. The committee also heard HB 1167, an emergency appropriation for motor carrier enforcement, and HB 1259, which would remove the need for an engineering study before reducing speed limits within 10 mph of the current limit; both had support from DOT and related groups. HB 1156 and HB 960, both related to harbor financing and capital advancement contracts, were supported by DOT, with DOT explaining that higher bond and contract ceilings were needed because project costs have increased since the limits were set decades ago. HB 142, exempting certain nonprofit community-based transportation providers from motor carrier regulation, and HB 914, creating a water carrier inflationary cost index mechanism and allowing PUC exemptions, also received support from multiple stakeholders, with the Consumer Advocacy Division noting that the inflationary adjustment issue was already active in a rate case. The committee also took testimony on several electric bicycle and micromobility bills. HB 486 would restrict where electric bicycles may operate, prohibit unsafe operation and removal of speed-limiting devices, and fund a safety education campaign; it drew opposition from the Hawaii Bicycling League and several individuals, with one supporter. HB 435 would redefine and classify electric bicycles, raise the minimum operating age, and add registration and use rules; it was supported by DOT and the Hawaii Bicycling League, with one individual opposing. HB 958 would regulate motorized bicycles and electric micromobility devices, require helmets for minors, and fund a coordinated education campaign; it drew support from the City and County of Honolulu, Council Member Tyler Dos Santos-Tam, and the Hawaii Bicycling League, but opposition from Moped Doctors and others, who argued the bill could harm the moped industry and that more study was needed. After testimony, the committee recessed and then reconvened for decision-making. In decision-making, the committee deferred HB 263 and HB 996. It passed HB 135, HB 860, HB 1167, HB 1259, HB 1156, and HB 960 with amendments, generally adopting HD1 versions, making technical changes, and setting effective dates to July 1, 3000 for the amended measures. The chair explained that HB 263 was deferred because a blanket tax exemption for one class could create inequities and a tax credit might be a better approach. HB 996 was deferred because the chair said the state’s long-standing policy of ensuring safe roads and maintaining accountability for highway design and maintenance remained important. For HB 960, the chair said the current contract caps were too low for modern harbor projects and that higher limits would improve flexibility and efficiency. The committee also noted Representative Cochran was excused for the remaining votes.

Transcript Highlights:

• Higher Education Regenerative Agriculture Grant Program to fund institutions of higher education in conducting
• HB 2128 requires the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service to conduct a study to evaluate the disparity
• The bill is explicit; it can only be used just to track our progress.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Keene State College, civic engagement has been an explicit college-wide learning outcome of Keene
• For criminal conduct, all of this is available through the judicial system.
• But not all conduct warrants this kind of tribunal.
• It creates a chilling effect on educators with a threat of code of conduct violations.
• conduct violations. conduct violations.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The AI-generated sexually explicit content is not.
• The AI-generated sexually explicit content is not.
• <03:16:01.160> situations victims in sexually explicit situations victims in sexually explicit
• <06:35:47.280> Pursuant conducted as fiveminute votes.
• Pursuant conducted as fiveminute votes.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, April 28, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• them and our co-trustes that are listed um on um this slide to um To reach, uh, um, an agreement to conduct
• Again, Secretary Kenny could probably be more explicit about what strategies can compensate him and other
• The plan was submitted to the Environment Department after several meetings were conducted throughout
• He conducts all of our medical training at the hospitals, um, for donning and doffing of PPE.
• And importantly, a lot of the evaluation from an environmental and a safety standpoint that was conducted

Transcript Highlights:

• even school board meetings couldn't be because if a student happened to show up, we didn't have explicit
• general public, anybody can attend either by ticket or otherwise, then it is not subjected to the explicit
• have explicit permission to record them. have explicit permission to record them.
• 01:14:31.760> subjected<01:14:32.320> to<01:14:32.560> the<01:14:32.960> explicit
• then it is not subjected to the explicit then it is not subjected to the explicit um<01:14:35.120

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A parent or guardian must be shown the seclusion room before providing explicit written consent for the
• If there's not explicit consent, if there are additional ways to build in safeguards, I am open to that
• If there's not explicit consent, if there are additional ways to build in safeguards, I am open to that
• I think the addition of, um, that explicit consent from parents, having to see the... circumstances.
• think the addition of um that explicit think the addition of um that explicit consent<01:12:31.280

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The Seclusion Working Group approved the prior meeting minutes and then spent most of the meeting discussing draft recommendations and a Senate amendment, 007-7, related to seclusion in schools. The chair explained the history of the issue, including Minnesota’s 2023 ban on seclusion from birth through grade 3, and described 007-7 as a compromise developed with stakeholders that would extend the ban through grade 6 unless strict conditions are met. Those conditions include explicit written informed consent from all parents or guardians in their primary language, oral translation of safeguards, showing the seclusion room before consent, mandatory follow-up IEP meetings after repeated use, outreach and education for families, and data reporting on use of seclusion. The chair also said the amendment would prevent judges or other officials from ordering seclusion over a parent’s objection. Members then reviewed the draft recommendations line by line. They agreed to revise language to add “and fund” after “mandate” in the first section, and discussed changing references from “level three and level four” to “level three and higher,” though several members ultimately preferred keeping the focus on school settings and not expanding into medical or correctional settings. They also discussed replacing the word “subjected” with more neutral language such as “experience” or “whose IEP includes seclusion.” Another issue was whether the recommendations should distinguish between students whose IEP already includes seclusion and students who experience seclusion in an emergency but do not have it in their IEP; members suggested splitting that into separate recommendations and possibly adding a new item for the latter situation. A final discussion focused on whether the working group should recommend a mandated alternative-to-seclusion program and whether such a mandate should be tied to funding. School district representatives said many districts already use programs such as CPI, but others, especially outstate districts, charter schools, hospitals, and residential settings, may face significant costs if required to adopt new programs like Ukeru. Members generally agreed that if the legislature is asked to require implementation of new alternatives, funding should accompany the mandate. The chair also noted that existing law already requires an IEP team meeting after restrictive procedures are used twice in 30 days, and encouraged members to compare that with the 007-7 language before finalizing recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• so last year this Bill criminal conduct so last year this Bill had<01:20:36.880> class<01:20:
• on the part of law enforcement conduct on the part of law enforcement and<01:32:15.000> there's
• uh that I was law of my conduct uh that I was law enforcement<03:46:17.279> but<03:46:17.680>
• <03:48:47.600> to order for their conduct to order for their conduct to be<03:48:49.279>
• , uh, at least internal repercussions, uh, whether or not the conduct was illegal.

Keywords: 1189, house, all