Video & Transcript Research : 'Senate Resolution 146'
Page 43 of 500
NC
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: Rules and Operations of the Senate Jun 17th, 2026
Rules and Operations of the Senate
NC
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: State and Local Government Jun 16th, 2026
State and Local Government
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: Agriculture, Energy, and Environment Jun 16th, 2026
Agriculture, Energy, and Environment
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: Rules and Operations of the Senate Jun 16th, 2026
Rules and Operations of the Senate
NC
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: Rules and Operations of the Senate Jun 15th, 2026
Rules and Operations of the Senate
NC
NC
NC
NC
North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate: State and Local Government Jun 12th, 2026
State and Local Government
NC
NC
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session Jun 3rd, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Messages from the Senate, there are none.
- The ayes have it, the resolution is adopted.
- And with our principal co-authors, Assemblymember Gibson, Senator Allen, Senator Menjivar, Senator Stern
- , and Senator Pérez.
- Assembly concurrent resolution. Ayes 75, noes 0. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 87.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Shortner? Present. Senator King? Here. Senator Blanco? Present. Senator Campbell? Present.
- Senator Creighton? Present. Senator Johnson? Present. Senator Kolkhorst? Present. Senator Menendez?
- Senator Schroeder? Present. Senator King? Here. Senator Blanco? Senator Campbell? Present.
- Senator Creighton? Senator Johnson? Senator Kolkhorst? Senator Menendez? Senator Middleton?
- Senator Kohlhorst. Senator Menendez. Senator Mendez. Senator Middleton. Senator Nichols.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 3 on Health and Human Services May 28th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Thanks, Senator. Hello, Madam Chair, Senator Grove, staff. Thank you.
- Senator Menjivar, Chair Menjivar, Senator Rove, and I also want to do a shout-out for Senator Padilla
- Senator Menjavar, Chair Menjavar, Senator Rove, and I also want to do a shout out for Senator Padilla
- Thank you, Senator Menjivar and Senator Grove.
- Moved by Senator Grove, please call the roll. Senators Menjivar, aye. Grove, aye.
Summary:
The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Human Services held its final hearing on the budget, with the chair framing the Senate’s plan as a counterproposal that rejected major cuts and preserved revenues. Public comment was overwhelmingly supportive of the subcommittee’s actions, with advocates, counties, providers, and community groups thanking members for rejecting or delaying proposed cuts to Medi-Cal asset limits, immigrant coverage and premiums, IHSS, PACE, APS, behavioral health advocacy and innovation grants, mobile crisis services, and certain dental and provider payment reductions. Speakers also urged additional funding or trailer bill changes for county eligibility work, public hospitals, indigent care, CalFresh outreach and food benefits, child care slots and COLAs, legal services for immigrants, and long-term services and supports.
A major theme was the Senate’s “Be Home Soon” proposal, which many disability, aging, home care, and health care organizations praised as a way to shift care from institutions to home- and community-based settings. Testimony also supported restoring or maintaining funding for behavioral health programs, including 988/mobile crisis infrastructure, community advocacy contracts, and Title IV-E workforce funding. Several county and provider groups asked the committee to consider alternative proposals related to H.R. 1 impacts, Medi-Cal coverage losses, and county indigent care costs, while others requested continued work on public hospital support, CFAP expansion, and implementation details for child care and IHSS.
The subcommittee then took three votes on grouped budget items. The first consent block, covering a large set of items, passed 3-0. The second block passed 2-1, with Senator Grove voting no. The final block passed 3-0. The hearing concluded with the chair stating the subcommittee had done its part and adjourning the meeting.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Special Education Funding Committee May 6th, 2026 at 09:00 am
Special Education Funding Committee
ND
North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Special Education Funding Committee May 6th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Axman mentioned...
- Senator Aboshi. Mr.
- For those of you who don't know Senator Beck at all, he is chair of Senate Appropriations, and he is
- Senator Bekkedahl. Senator Bekkedahl. Thank you, Mr.
- Senator Ashman. Senator Axman. Yeah, thanks. You know, I just don't think it's that simple.
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes and then received a lengthy DPI presentation from Stanley Schauer on statewide reading and math assessment data for students with and without disabilities. He explained the assessment systems used over time, the absence of 2019-20 data, and how North Dakota’s standards are set by educators. Members asked about alternate assessments, cohort trends, the apparent drop in proficiency in higher grades, and the new NDA+ assessment. Schauer emphasized that the biggest pattern in the data was the relative stability of students with disabilities, the post-pandemic drop and partial recovery, and the need to focus on reducing the novice category. He also said the state plans to revisit high school standard setting and that future data could be broken out by program, disability category, and schools using science-of-math or other initiatives. Public testimony from special education staff suggested that the flat performance of students with disabilities during COVID likely reflected continued services and intensive supports, and committee members discussed whether the current disparity goal is realistic and whether growth measures would be more useful than simple proficiency buckets.
After the presentation, the committee took a short break and then moved into discussion of special education funding models. Chair Richter said members should contact Schauer directly with ideas for additional data views and noted that the committee would continue its work on funding and possible model changes. Brandon Bomback of Grand Forks Public Schools began a presentation arguing that the special education funding formula, especially the weighting factor, should be reconsidered if the committee wants a system that better reflects accountability and student needs. He said his comments were based on the perspective of a larger district and focused on the special education weighting factor rather than other parts of the formula. The remainder of his presentation was not included in the excerpt.
DE
Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Capital Improvement Committee Meeting Jun 23rd, 2026
Capital Improvement
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Spiros Mantzavinos [member_1319]: here. Senator Marie Pinkney [member_23550]: present.
- Senator Walsh: present. Senator Wilson: present. Madam Chair, all 12 members are present.
- Thank you, Senator.
- Sorry, senators, right? I think that's a demotion. Sorry, senators, right?
- Senator Walsh. I move to adopt the epilogue language. Senator Walsh.
Summary:
The committee met for a fiscal year 2027 capital budget writing session with all 12 members present. It first reviewed and approved the DNREC Resource Conservation and Development drainage project list, which would add projects across New Castle, Kent, and Sussex counties and bring the total eligible projects to 1,561. Members offered personal remarks thanking retiring conservation district staff, especially Kevin Donnelly, for years of work on drainage and water issues. The committee then reviewed DelDOT Rule 12 changes, including annual date updates and a reduction in the inflation markup applied to older estimates, and approved the rule as amended.
The committee next adopted DelDOT Appendix A and the FY27 paving and rehabilitation list, including the subdivision street management fund and various road resurfacing projects. DelDOT explained that paving projects are for state-of-good-repair work and that major changes from corridor studies would be handled separately. The committee also approved DelDOT epilogue changes, including updates to authorization amounts, a $25 million increase for toll infrastructure work, changes to subdivision street paving language, and an increase in the subdivision street paving management fund to $30 million. Several sections were placed on hold for later updates.
The committee then moved through boilerplate epilogue sections in the bond bill, approving a wide range of provisions affecting conservation districts, housing, economic development, corrections, DNREC, public safety, transportation, agriculture, fire prevention, education, and other agencies. Many sections were adopted in groups, while some were held for later revisions or deleted as no longer needed. The session included updates to school capital rules, transportation restrictions and reporting requirements, DNREC conservation and land-use provisions, and funding and administrative authorities across multiple agencies. The committee broke for lunch after approving the education-related sections through 147, with additional sections still pending.