Transcript Highlights:

• Members, since 1999, the total amounts deposited into the judicial fund by statutory probate courts and
• I, I certainly think that a judge, a judicial magistrate should in fact have some, you know, mandatory
• , this is Senator Huffman's bill relating to the discipline of judges by the State Commission on Judicial
• Conduct, Notice of certain reprimands, judicial compensation.
• This is Zafarini's bill relating to certain notice and filing requirements in court proceedings involving

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill ensures the safety and integrity of the judicial system by protecting court officials from
• I just want to quickly thank my state attorney for the 20th Judicial Circuit, Amira Fox, and her team
• is told. that there's an administrative investigation proceeding.
• Now this inmate has to navigate the judicial process of equitable estoppel in order to try to defeat
• CS for HB 265, post-judgment execution proceedings relating to terrorism, by Rep. Porras.

Summary: The Judiciary Committee took up a long agenda of 20 bills, beginning with CS/HB 1173 on the Florida Trust Code, which clarified that the Florida Attorney General is the only public official with standing to enforce charitable trusts administered in Florida; it was amended and reported favorably. The committee also unanimously or near-unanimously approved several claims and relief bills, including HB 6507 for Marcus Button, HB 6523 for Darlene Engerville and J.R., HB 6525 for Eric and Jennifer Miles, HB 6529 for J.N., and HB 6519 for the estate of Beniel Hambier, all involving settlements or compensation for injuries or wrongful death. Other measures reported favorably included CS/HB 213 on commercial squatters, CS/HB 1447 on trespass at large-scale ticketed events, CS/HB 515 updating the Uniform Commercial Code for virtual currency and related technologies, CS/HB 1007 on gift card fraud, CS/HB 1049 on protection of court officials, CS/HB 1219 on non-compete and garden leave agreements, CS/HB 399 on stolen valor in the ethics code, CS/HB 57 on xylazine regulation, HB 901 on court-appointed psychologists, and CS/HB 265 on enforcing terrorism-related judgments against frozen assets. Most of these bills had support from industry, law enforcement, or affected parties and passed with little or no opposition. The most contested measure was CS/HB 1517, which would expand Florida’s wrongful death statute to include parents of unborn children as survivors. Supporters argued it would allow families to recover damages when negligence causes the loss of a pregnancy, while opponents—including the ACLU of Florida, Planned Parenthood affiliates, reproductive rights advocates, and some committee members—warned it could be used to advance fetal personhood, chill medical care, and empower abusive partners or others to sue over abortion-related conduct. The sponsor said the bill remained within the wrongful death framework and included protections for mothers and lawful medical providers, but the committee still reported it favorably on a 14-6 vote. CS/HB 903, a corrections bill addressing inmate litigation, sentencing, execution methods, tracking devices, health services, and offender review appointments, also drew debate over a proposed tolling amendment and due process concerns; the amendment failed and the bill passed 16-5. CS/HB 57 on xylazine likewise saw debate over whether penalties should target users or traffickers, but the committee rejected a narrowing amendment and passed the bill 20-1. Several bills were amended in committee, often with technical or clarifying changes, including CS/HB 1219, HB 1351 on sexual offender and predator registration, and HB 901. Public testimony was generally supportive on the non-controversial bills, especially from law enforcement, business groups, and affected claimants. At the end of the meeting, Rep. Gottlieb offered a personal correction, acknowledging he had wrongly criticized FOP in a prior meeting after learning the organization had, in fact, contacted him. The committee then adjourned after completing the full agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:02:39.599> Judiciary Grove uh I served on a judici Judiciary Grove uh I served on a judici
• Judiciary earlier this year the judicial Judiciary earlier this year the judicial Council<00:16:
• enes mcmc's and so on there are judicial enes mcmc's and so on there are judicial officers<00:36
• Shorba about the judicial process.
• Shorba about the judicial process.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Board of Judicial Standards, $645,000.
• /c><00:04:57.320> the<00:04:57.440> board<00:04:57.639> of<00:04:57.840> judicial
• $115,000 base the board of judicial $115,000 base the board of judicial standards<00:04:59.520><
• will, so to the extent that this committee deals with the sort of practice and procedures of the judicial
• The goal being to restore those individuals to competency so that the criminal proceedings can go forward

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee met for an introductory session focused on committee organization, staff roles, and an overview of the committee’s jurisdiction. Members and staff introduced themselves, and the chair explained that one member was absent due to a meeting with the governor. House fiscal staff member John Walls reviewed the committee’s budget spreadsheet and explained the agencies under the committee’s jurisdiction, including the Supreme Court, Board of Civil Legal Aid, Court of Appeals, district courts, Guardian ad Litem Board, Tax Court, Uniform Laws Commission, Board of Judicial Standards, Board of Public Defense, Human Rights Commission, Office of Appellate Counsel and Training, and the Competency Restoration Board. He also explained how fiscal notes work and how costs or revenue impacts are tracked for bills. Nathan Hopkins then described the committee’s broad civil law jurisdiction, covering areas such as property, torts, contracts, civil rights, consumer protection, employment, family law, remedies, statutes of limitations, damages, burdens of proof, due process, and attorney general enforcement. He also outlined the committee’s role in government data practices under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, emphasizing the distinction between transparency and privacy and noting that bills affecting Chapter 13 are often re-referred to this committee. Ben Johnson added that he handles appropriations and court-related policy provisions, with most budget drafting expected later in the session. A member asked about the Competency Restoration Board, and Johnson explained that it was created to address cases involving criminal defendants found incompetent to proceed, with the goal of coordinating placements and services to restore competency rather than serving as long-term civil commitment. The chair also noted the importance of privacy and technology issues, mentioning past bipartisan work on body cameras, license plate readers, and drones. The meeting ended with a brief announcement about a law school for legislators program and an invitation to attend upcoming Zoom sessions, after which the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• within those competency proceedings.
• those competency proceedings within those competency proceedings<00:18:35.159> it<00:18:35.360
• an independent board within the judicial an independent board within the judicial branch<00:19:33.320
• This is organized by judicial district.
• This is organized by judicial district.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the director for the Commission on Judicial Complaints. Is there a clicker somewhere?
• It causes a lot of litigation beyond just the actual removal proceedings themselves.
• officers that are called to Oklahoma City to hear these proceedings.
• Second, I've listed the Judicial College that I've talked to you about.
• Would that be a legitimate course for a judicial complaint?

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• These mics are connected to the live stream so that the public may watch the proceedings.
• On the audio recording of Chancery proceedings...
• On the audio recording of Chancery proceedings, I note that such recording could diminish the respect
• for the Court of Chancery on which its legitimacy is based and serve to dramatize court proceedings
• judicial officers from recording courtroom proceedings except as authorized by the Delaware Supreme

Bills: SB268, SB306, SB264, SB312

Keywords: federal workers, government shutdown, interest-free loans, tax deferral, public transportation, Rehoboth Beach, municipal charter, city charter amendment, commissioners, mayor, local government, election qualifications, affidavit of eligibility, domestic partner, cohabitant, conflict of interest, freeholder, leaseholder, municipal court, Alderman

Summary: The House Administration Committee met to consider a series of resolutions and bills covering arts districts, child care background checks, federal worker relief, health care reform, court transparency, school tax reassessment, municipal charter changes, constitutional amendment procedures, data center nondisclosure agreements, state employee benefits governance, and lieutenant governor vacancies. Members also noted that House Concurrent Resolution 12 had been removed from the agenda and that public comment would be limited to one minute per speaker. The committee released SCR 167 to study arts, culture, and creative districts in Delaware; HB 438 to close a loophole in the child care service letter requirement; SB 268 to provide interest-free loans, free transit, and tax deferrals for federal workers during shutdowns; SS2 for SB 1 to expand and permanently strengthen primary care investment while also addressing hospital cost growth; HCR 147 to request a Court of Chancery report on audio recordings and automated case assignment; SB 322 to replace the current post-reassessment 10% school revenue increase authority with a 2% annual increase option under safeguards; SB 306 to amend the Rehoboth Beach charter; HB 440 to require voter approval for constitutional amendments after legislative approval; SB 312 to bar nondisclosure agreements for large data center projects; SS1 for SB 289 to change State Employee Benefits Committee governance; and SB 264 to require a special election to fill a lieutenant governor vacancy. Testimony was mixed on several measures. Arts, child care, federal worker relief, primary care, court transparency, data center transparency, and the lieutenant governor vacancy bill drew mostly supportive testimony, while SB 322 and SB 306 drew both support and opposition, especially over tax impacts and the proposed spouse/partner restriction in Rehoboth Beach. HB 440 prompted debate over whether 55% voter approval was the right threshold for constitutional amendments, and SB 312 was supported as a transparency measure by residents affected by prior data center NDAs. All of the listed measures were released from committee by roll call vote, with some members voting no on HB 440, SB 306, SB 312, SS1 for SB 289, and SB 264.

Transcript Highlights:

• proceedings proceedings um<00:20:56.560> for<00:20:56.800> the<00:20:57.440> for
• consent, court order, judicial warrant. consent, court order, judicial warrant.
• <00:56:52.040> for a judicial warrant. Senator Limmer. for a judicial warrant.
• <02:46:55.680> for um or on a preliminary proceeding for um or on a preliminary proceeding
• proceeding if if the court has so ruled. proceeding if if the court has so ruled.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• on Public Education HB 1707 by Laine Graf relating to the duties of District Attorney of the 70th Judicial
• HB 1741 by Johnson relating to the proceeding supervision following certain adjunctions occurring in
• Notice of certain reprimands, judicial compensation, and related retirement benefits and reporting of
• the judicial transparency information authorizing administrative penalty for the Committee on Judiciary
• The state commission of the Judicial Conduct notice of certain reprimands and judicial compensation related

Transcript Highlights:

• proceedings but is considered judicial proceedings but is considered for<00:08:25.960> whatever
• Any data that's used in an enforcement proceeding is already subject to this standard, and can it be
• used as a challenge to the data that's being presented in the enforcement proceeding?
• <00:13:57.519> in<00:13:57.720> enforcement<00:13:58.199> proceedings proceedings
• in enforcement proceedings proceedings in enforcement proceedings they<00:13:59.279> might<00

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:44 Introduction of Guests 01:21 HB 137 Discussion 02:11 HB 137 Roll Call Vote 25:35 HB 346 Discussion 26:15 HB 346 Roll Call Vote 27:24, 958, all

Summary: The Natural Resources Committee met with prayer and the Pledge, approved the prior minutes, and recognized visiting guests, including representatives from Nucor Steel and students from Eastern Kentucky University. The main business was House Bill 137, which would require air-pollution enforcement actions by the Energy and Environment Cabinet and Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District to rely on EPA-approved monitoring methods or scientifically defensible, quality-assured data. The sponsor and industry supporters argued the bill would ensure reliable evidence and protect manufacturers from enforcement based on questionable data. Opponents, including the Kentucky Resources Council, the West Jefferson County Community Task Force, and a former cabinet employee, argued the bill would conflict with the Clean Air Act’s allowance for “any credible evidence,” could exclude community air-monitoring data and citizen complaints, and might weaken enforcement by limiting the use of lower-cost sensors, photos, video, and other nontraditional evidence. Committee members questioned how credible evidence and the Daubert standard would apply, and supporters and opponents debated whether the bill would simply set evidentiary rules or improperly narrow enforcement authority. One member also raised concerns that the bill’s title and scope could be read as affecting the broader air program. House Bill 137 was ultimately approved favorably by roll call vote, with Senator Webb’s aye vote later clarified for the record. The committee then took up House Bill 346, as amended by a subcommittee. The bill was described as helping about 708 companies and carving out emergency generators used for safety purposes in distilleries, with support from the Kentucky Chamber. The subcommittee amendment was adopted, and the bill passed the committee favorably by roll call vote. The meeting ended with an attempted adjournment and a brief record correction on the vote for House Bill 137.

Transcript Highlights:

• It'll be a more formal proceeding.
• another proceeding. another proceeding.
• We're going to have a proceeding separate<02:28:39.520> proceeding<02:28:39.920> for<02
• :28:40.160> KIC separate proceeding for KIC separate proceeding for KIC those<02:28:42.960>
• That's one proceeding. A separate proceeding is what's happening in the PBR docket now.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee held an informational briefing on the Public Utilities Commission’s performance-based regulation (PBR) framework and the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs’ whistleblower complaint process. Chair Jared Kohole opened the meeting, noted it was informational only with no public testimony, and explained that members would hear presentations and then have an opportunity for questions. The committee heard first from Ulupono Initiative, which provided background on why utilities are regulated, how Hawaii’s cost-of-service model and rate cases work, and why PBR was adopted to shift utility incentives away from a capital-investment bias and toward performance, efficiency, cost control, and policy goals such as renewable energy and reliability. Ulupono described Hawaii’s PBR structure as a five-year multi-year rate plan with annual revenue adjustments, a customer dividend, a Z factor for extraordinary exogenous events, and an exceptional project recovery mechanism for large projects. It also outlined performance incentive mechanisms tied to renewable portfolio standard progress, interconnection speed, reliability, and shared savings. The presentation said the current docket is evaluating a possible hybrid approach that would combine forward-looking forecasting with historical results, and Ulupono advocated for stronger incentives, arguing the current rewards are too small relative to utility revenues and should be more meaningful to better align utility behavior with legislative intent. The PUC then presented its own overview, emphasizing that the PBR docket is open and active and that the briefing was limited to the record to avoid ex parte concerns. The commission described the development of PBR in Hawaii through multiple phases beginning in 2018: an initial collaborative phase to set goals, a formal contested-case phase that produced the initial framework, later phases adding scorecards, reported metrics, and additional performance incentive mechanisms, and subsequent refinements including sunset of some mechanisms and adjustments after the August 2023 Maui wildfires. The PUC said the framework is intended to be customer-centric, administratively efficient, and protective of utility financial integrity, and that current work includes evaluating how to balance forward-looking and historical test-year approaches within the rebasing process. No votes or formal actions were taken at the briefing.

Transcript Highlights:

• It strengthens our entire judicial system by ensuring it reflects the diversity of the communities it
• proceedings.
• proceedings.
• Without judicial deference as a safeguard, a truly independent panel is our next best defense, one that
• This is not a radical idea without judicial deference as a safeguard.

Transcript Highlights:

• It talks about the proceeding the person is going to have.
• I found if their machines are illegal anyway, why would there be a need for another proceeding?
• Our last one of the day, Committee 507, Special Protections and Judicial Proceedings by Rep. Baker.
• It's encapsulated, it's judiciously reviewed over and over again.
• They are triggered only by judicial findings.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have a judicial proceedings report. This is report number 18.
• We have a judicial proceedings report. We have a judicial proceedings report.
• This is uh, report judicial proceedings. This is uh, report number<00:18:07.360> 19.
• >> Judicial proceedings. >> Do 11 a.m. for voting. >> 11 a.m. on Monday for judicial proceedings.
• >> Judicial proceedings. >> Do 11 a.m. for voting. >> 11 a.m. on Monday for judicial proceedings.

Keywords: Senate streaming session for Friday, March 20, 2026, 960, senate, all

Summary: The Senate reconvened with a quorum and quickly moved through committee reports and second-reader bills, adopting committee amendments and sending several measures to third reading without objection. Bills advanced included SB 10 on State Highway Administration approval timelines for speed monitoring systems; SB 487 on speed monitoring systems in safety corridors; SB 689 creating a task force on post-release services and re-entry; SB 811 requiring reporting of new home sale prices in multiple listing services; SB 877 authorizing a Baltimore City stop sign monitoring pilot in the 41st district; SB 937, the Maryland Fair Chance Housing Act, limiting use of criminal history in tenant screening; SB 984 barring private immigration detention facilities; SB 465 on out-of-court statements and second-degree assault; SB 187 on pre-release services for incarcerated women; SB 388, the Decade Act, revising multiple economic development and tax credit programs; and SB 844, the annual corrective bill. Most of the floor discussion focused on explaining amendments and the policy effects of the bills. Supporters described the housing bill as expanding second-chance opportunities while adding safeguards, and a senator asked detailed questions about how landlords could screen for serious offenses and sex offender registry status. SB 984 was described as an emergency measure preventing state and local approval of private detention facilities and authorizing enforcement by the Attorney General. SB 465 was presented as closing a gap in Maryland law on witness intimidation and aligning the state with broader practice. SB 187 would rename and expand the women’s pre-release facility into a re-entry facility and require progress reports. The most extended debate came on SB 165, the on-site wastewater systems bill. One amendment to exempt redevelopment properties from inspection was offered and failed by roll call with 27 votes in the negative. A second amendment to require consultation with Maryland Realtors in developing regulations was then offered; supporters argued it would help avoid delays in property settlements and bring real estate professionals into the regulatory process, while opponents said the bill concerned broader wastewater regulations, not just property transfers. The transcript cuts off during that amendment’s discussion, before the final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• , effort to revise our own internal decorum policies for operation of both our courtrooms at the Judicial
• , effort to revise our own internal decorum policies for operation of both our courtrooms at the Judicial
• Um, and I would ask what safety drills look like for the judicial branch. Oh yes.
• Um and to be more specific uh about who we are uh talking about uh here with regards to um the judicial
• here with regards to um the judicial here with regards to um the judicial branch<00:37:29.440>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And previous Chief Judge in the 4th Judicial Circuit. Good afternoon.
• So, yes, there is judicial supervision, and yes, there are sanctions.
• McClure, to discuss the Judicial Branch legislative agenda, you are recognized, sir.
• The judicial certification opinion indicates a need for new judges.
• The next issue relates to judicial notarization.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• proceedings proceedings um<01:29:51.080> more<01:29:51.520> for<01:29:51.800> lack<
• although the the forfeiture proceeding although the the forfeiture proceeding is<01:37:12.719>
• :14.199> the is a separate proceeding from the is a separate proceeding from the criminal<01:37
• to uh make forfeiture proceedings to uh make forfeiture proceedings somewhat<01:37:43.440> less
• <02:21:30.600> branch violence cases and the judicial branch violence cases and the judicial

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met in executive session and first took up HB 148, which would allow classification by biological sex in limited circumstances such as multi-use bathrooms, certain athletic events, and involuntary commitment facilities. Supporters argued the bill was needed to protect privacy and safety, especially for women and girls, and said it was consistent with recent federal actions and prior legislation. Opponents said the bill lacked a clear definition of biological sex, could create confusion and discrimination, and was unnecessary because existing law and sports rules already address the issues raised. After debate, the committee voted 10-8 to recommend ought to pass on HB 148. The chair asked for a majority report and noted that a minority report would likely be filed. The committee then considered HB 254, a bill related to end-of-life medical decision-making. Supporters framed it as a matter of liberty and relief from suffering for terminally ill patients, while opponents raised moral objections, concerns about suicide being normalized, and worries about deceptive wording and death-certificate reporting. HB 254 was approved on an 11-7 vote for ought to pass, with the chair indicating he would write the majority report and Representative Perez the minority report. The committee then moved to HB 611 with Amendment 2025-0638, a replace-all amendment restoring prior law on recoupment of appointed-counsel costs from indigent criminal defendants and juveniles. The chair explained the amendment as reversing 2020 changes that had limited cost recovery, and the discussion focused on financial affidavits and the Office of Cost Containment’s ability to review indigency claims. The transcript cuts off before the committee vote on HB 611.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that’s where the judicial discretion comes in. So that’s actually at the arrest stage. Okay.
• Same judicial discretion comes into play regarding whether or not to keep... comes into play whether
• I think judicial discretion is an important function, and I think this bill allows for that judicial
• Um, allows for that judicial discretion weighted consideration from those two entities or those who might
• If we could maybe look at language in there to specify if it is for true legal proceedings.

Bills: SB210, SB292, HB360, HB233, HB66, HB356, HB164, HB238, HB209, SB223, HB307, SB210, SB292, HB360, HB233, HB66, HB356, HB164, HB238, HB209, SB223, HB307

Keywords: hospital liens, medical billing, government healthcare, insurance claims, patient rights, education oversight, subpoena authority, investigation, State Superintendent, school misconduct, drug courts, accountability, veterans, mental health, substance abuse, rehabilitation, criminal justice, court intervention, elder abuse, financial exploitation

Transcript Highlights:

• And that would be the judicial<01:23:57.120> council's judicial council's judicial council's budget
• and criminal proceedings is a function of them being criminal proceedings.
• , not all proceedings, but during certain proceedings.
• > but proceedings, not all proceedings, but proceedings, not all proceedings, but during<01:56:07.040
• And the during certain proceedings.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Turning to page six, Item 6, judicial salaries... Item 6, judicial salaries.
• Moving on to item two, judicial salaries: as we've discussed, the Judicial Compensation Commission has
• for changes in judicial tenure.
• eight external proceedings.
• of judicial misconduct against judges, as well as judicial disability.

Bills: SB 1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards

Summary: The Senate Finance Committee convened for its first hearing of the 89th regular session, confirmed a quorum, adopted committee rules by a 15-0 vote, and began review of Senate Bill 1, the state budget for fiscal years 2026-27. Chair Huffman outlined the committee’s organization, introduced staff, and described the budget as conservative and focused on one-time investments. She highlighted major SB 1 priorities including property tax relief, full funding for public education formulas, teacher pay, school safety, border security, Medicaid growth, dementia research, energy and water infrastructure, transportation, wildfire suppression, and other capital and public safety needs. Comptroller Glenn Hager presented the biennial revenue estimate, saying the state has $194.6 billion available for general-purpose spending in 2026-27, with a projected $23.8 billion ending balance from the current biennium. He cautioned that revenue growth is returning to more normal levels and that lawmakers should avoid committing short-term surpluses to ongoing expenses. He also explained that the Economic Stabilization Fund is projected to hit its constitutional cap, meaning an estimated $5.6 billion in severance tax and related revenue would remain in general revenue in the upcoming biennium rather than flow into the fund. Senators discussed whether to raise or rename the fund and the implications of keeping more severance-tax revenue in general revenue. The Legislative Budget Board then gave an overview of SB 1 and the budget’s major funding changes. LBB staff explained that the bill is essentially flat at $332.9 billion in all funds, but includes large method-of-finance shifts and major property tax relief. They detailed how prior property tax relief enacted in the 88th Legislature grew from an estimated $18 billion to $22.7 billion because of higher property values and hold-harmless provisions, and said SB 1 continues that relief with a total of $51 billion in ongoing and new property tax support. Members asked extensive questions about the automatic growth in school tax compression, the constitutional homestead exemption, COVID-era federal funding, Medicaid assumptions, and the sunset of the non-homestead circuit breaker. No additional votes or final budget actions were taken beyond adoption of the committee rules.