Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation does one thing. It provides legislative staff with the ability to form a union.
• This legislation does one thing. It provides legislative staff with the ability to form a union.
• This legislation will address that. If passed, the legislation would do three things.
• This legislation will address that. If passed, the legislation would do three things.
• To be clear, this legislation does not undermine the unique nature of legislative work.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The hearing focused on several labor-related bills, especially proposals to give legislative employees the right to organize and collectively bargain, close a prevailing wage loophole for off-site prefabrication work, and strengthen enforcement against wage theft. Committee chairs opened the hearing by explaining the hybrid format and asking witnesses to keep testimony brief. Multiple legislators testified in support of the legislative staff union bill, saying staff deserve the same bargaining rights as other public employees and that unionization would improve pay, benefits, retention, and workplace dignity. Witnesses also discussed how the bill would likely be structured, with separate House and Senate bargaining arrangements or locals, and emphasized that it would only create the option to unionize, not require it. A second major topic was the prevailing wage bill addressing off-site fabrication and prefabrication in construction. Union leaders, contractors, and workers described how more work is being shifted from job sites into shops, especially in sheet metal, HVAC, electrical, and pipefitting work, and argued that the law should treat that work the same as on-site construction when it is part of a public project. They said the current loophole lets some contractors underbid by paying lower wages off-site, while responsible contractors already pay prevailing wages in their shops. Supporters argued the bill would protect workers, preserve apprenticeship and training standards, improve safety and quality, and make enforcement easier through certified payroll and clearer definitions. The committee also heard testimony on wage theft legislation. Representative Dan Donahue, the Attorney General’s Fair Labor Division, AFL-CIO representatives, and carpenters’ union witnesses described wage theft, misclassification, labor brokers, and tax fraud as widespread problems that hurt workers, honest contractors, and public revenues. They supported giving the Attorney General stronger enforcement tools, adding contractor accountability up the subcontracting chain, and protecting workers from retaliation and from delays that can cause claims to expire. A separate witness supported a bill to extend the statute of limitations for Wage Act cases while AG investigations are pending, and another supported changes to help hospital workers enforce timely payment rights. No votes were taken during the hearing; witnesses repeatedly asked for favorable reports on the bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's the Office of the Legislative Auditor, that you heard from last week; the Legislative Budget
• jurisdiction. comprised of legislative leadership it comprised of legislative leadership it is<00:01
• minority the chair of the legislative minority the chair of the legislative coordin<00:02:29.879
• heard from last week the legislative you heard from last week the legislative budget<00:03:14.560>
• budget office the legislative reference budget office the legislative reference library<00:03:17.159

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met briefly to approve the January 16 minutes, then heard a series of informational presentations from legislative joint offices and commissions that fall under its jurisdiction. Michelle Urick of the Legislative Coordinating Commission explained the LCC’s governance structure, including its leadership-based membership and role overseeing joint offices such as the Legislative Auditor, Legislative Budget Office, Legislative Reference Library, Revisor of Statutes, and the LCC staff office itself. Christian Larson of the Legislative Budget Office described the office’s nonpartisan fiscal note work, local impact notes, and support for the Tax Expenditure Review Commission, noting the volume of requests it handles and that the office currently has 18 budgeted FTE. He also explained the LBO Oversight Commission’s role in setting standards and appointing the director. Elizabeth Lincoln of the Legislative Reference Library outlined the library’s services, including answering thousands of reference questions, maintaining state policy and legislative collections, archiving state documents, supporting the legislative website and search tools, and preserving House and Senate audio, video, and committee minutes. She also noted the library’s staffing levels and its move to the Capitol. In response to a question, she said copies of the book Minnesota Standoff were in constant circulation, that the title is out of print, and that the library had digitized it for use by legislators and staff. Ryan Inman, the Revisor of Statutes, described the office’s drafting, legal review, publication, IT, and other services. He said every bill introduced is reviewed by a Revisor attorney, the office publishes Laws of Minnesota, Minnesota Statutes, and Minnesota Rules, and it maintains the legislative drafting system now being replaced. He also discussed rule drafting for agencies, legal counsel, the claims subcommittee, court opinions reports, and the annual technical Revisor bill. Members asked about bill volume, amendment drafting, and the history of administrative rules review; Inman said the office is handling over 2,500 active bill requests and that a prior commission on administrative rules existed in the past. No votes were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• It is ordered to the Legislative Bureau.
• It is ordered to the Legislative Bureau.
• It is order to the Legislative Bureau.
• House Bill 162 by Rosenton of the Legislative, Municipal Affairs favorably as ordered to the Legislative
• Members, this authorizes legislators.

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• conservation legislation in this session.
• We strongly support this legislation.
• Point of highly complex technical legislation.
• I don't want paid legislators; I don't want paying our legislators to encourage them to never leave and
• Sure, we'll pay our legislators.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:03:57.960> legislative to influence legislate legislative to influence legislate legislative
• . legislation. legislation.
• . legislation. legislation.
• And as your role as a legislator,<00:41:48.160> um legislator, um legislator, um that's<00:41:
• The role of a legislator,<00:41:58.880> yeah. legislator, yeah. legislator, yeah.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• of the Legislative Audit Commission.
• It will be people that are on the Legislative Audit Commission, legislators from both parties.
• ><00:08:26.800> parties commission legislators from both parties commission legislators from both
• commission just like the legislative commission just like the legislative Auditor<00:08:52.320><
• on this heavily with the legislative on this heavily with the legislative auditor's<00:09:42.959

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The meeting focused on a package of anti-fraud bills and oversight reforms. House File 3 would direct the Office of Legislative Auditor to compile existing audit and recommendation data into a matrix or numeric score showing how well agencies have implemented past recommendations over a five-year look-back period, with the goal of giving legislators a clearer, more usable accountability tool. Supporters said it would not create new data, only aggregate what already exists, and estimated the bill’s cost at about $240,000. They argued it would help lawmakers identify agencies that repeatedly fail to address waste, fraud, and abuse. House File 2 would require state employees and agencies to immediately report suspected fraud to law enforcement and to legislative committee leaders, require unannounced in-person site visits for grant recipients, and add criminal penalties for failing to carry out those duties. House File 1 would create an independent state Office of Inspector General to investigate fraud in state government, with subpoena power, authority to stop payments, and the ability to share information with other agencies. Speakers said the new office should be independent and nonpartisan, separate from existing agency inspector general functions, and more focused on investigations than the Legislative Auditor. Members also discussed the new fraud and oversight committee, which will meet on Mondays and plans to invite DHS Commissioner Jodi Harpstead to testify. The committee said it will work alongside standing committees, create a whistleblower reporting website, and investigate issues as they arise. In response to questions, Robbins said HF 3 already had a fiscal note and HF 2’s fiscal note was still pending. She also said the committee is considering AI tools to flag irregularities in state programs, and that such tools might have detected problems like those seen in Feeding Our Future.

Transcript Highlights:

• legislators potentially in district? legislators potentially in district?
• issues for legislators. issues for legislators. Madam<00:08:41.599> Chair.
• legislative representative body. legislative representative body.
• variety of legislator risk, frankly. variety of legislator risk, frankly.
• . legislation. legislation.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• any legislative changes.
• And then we're also going to do review of enacted legislation because, Do review of enacted legislation
• And then we as the legislative branch are outsourcing to Legislative Council to then step into an executive
• And then we as the legislative branch are outsourcing to legislative council to then step into an executive
• Especially if we are the ones leaning on Legislative Council, so if they want to provide us legislators

Bills: HB1220

Keywords: accelerated degree, high-demand occupations, education reform, North Dakota, licensing, 908, all

Summary: The Workforce Development Committee reconvened to discuss House Bill 1119, which would create a child care advisory committee and authorize a Legislative Council program evaluation of child care services. Senator Hogan explained that the bill is intended to review child care licensing rules, child care assistance, and related laws and policies, while also giving child care providers a stronger voice in the rulemaking process. He described the proposal as a new model for legislative program evaluation and noted that leadership had been briefed and was supportive. Committee members raised concerns about the bill’s wording, scope, and structure. Senator Larson questioned the title and several sections, and multiple members suggested making the response language less directive and more collaborative, including changing “shall” to “may” in the section requiring a written response from the Department of Health and Human Services. Members also discussed limiting the advisory committee to the interim, clarifying that the evaluation would focus on child care services rather than broader early childhood programs, and adjusting language about enacted legislation to sound more neutral. The committee also discussed fiscal impact, with Hogan saying the evaluation would be done by Legislative Council staff and that any costs would likely be limited to meetings and existing DHS rulemaking activities. Members compared the proposal to other oversight models, including audit-style reviews and a possible DOGE process, and Hogan emphasized that the bill is meant to evaluate why child care issues keep recurring and why some laws are not fully implemented. No vote was taken; the committee agreed to continue refining the bill and planned to meet again the following Thursday.

Transcript Highlights:

• The companion legislation is House Bill 325.
• Today is the last day for committee action on legislation.
• I move passage of the legislation.
• Legislation, Port Committee on Education.
• Legislation originally passed the House.

Keywords: March 09, 2026 - Regular Session, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• a legislative research bureau.
• Rank-and-file legislators are insufficiently resourced.
• The majority of legislative branch auditors and evaluators report and take audit requests from a legislative
• Some report and take direction from legislative leadership.
• How do you audit the performance of legislation, number one?

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The subcommittee hearing focused on whether the Office of the State Auditor may constitutionally audit the Massachusetts Legislature under Chapter 250 of the Acts of 2024 and what such an audit could include under generally accepted government auditing standards. Chair Cindy Friedman opened by explaining the background: voters approved Ballot Question 1 in November 2024, the law took effect in January 2025, and the Auditor then initiated audits of both chambers. The chair said the subcommittee was seeking expert testimony because the proposed audit scope, constitutionality, and possible bias concerns remained unresolved. Public testimony was invited, but no members of the public pre-registered; written testimony remained open for a short period after the hearing. The hearing then proceeded with invited experts on constitutional law/state government and auditing-related issues. Professor Lawrence Friedman testified that the ballot initiative’s approval by the Attorney General and by voters did not resolve constitutional questions, and he argued Chapter 250 violates the Massachusetts Constitution. He said the Legislature has constitutional authority to set its own rules and manage its proceedings, and that an executive-branch audit would intrude on legislative deliberation, speech and debate protections, and separation of powers. He also warned that even audits of supposedly administrative matters could become a vehicle for repeated document demands and litigation that would indirectly burden legislative functioning. In questioning, senators pressed him on the line between administrative and deliberative functions, the role of the Attorney General versus the courts, the possibility of retroactive audit scope, and whether prior legislative consent to audits mattered; he said prior consent would not bind future legislatures and that constitutionality is ultimately for the courts. Professor Ray La Raja also opposed the audit, framing it as a threat to institutional independence and representative democracy. He argued that allowing an executive-branch official to audit the Legislature without consent would upset separation of powers, chill internal debate, and create a precedent for broader executive intrusion. He said voters often support “transparency” reforms without fully appreciating institutional consequences, and that legislatures should defend their autonomy, especially amid what he described as broader executive overreach nationally. Senators asked about chilling effects, the practical distinction between administrative and core legislative functions, and whether the courts or the Legislature should resolve the issue; he said the courts would ultimately adjudicate disputes, but the Legislature should not waive its constitutional authority lightly. Jean Kempthorne took the opposite view, arguing the audit is permissible and should proceed. She said the state auditor is a constitutional officer accountable directly to the people, that the audit power can be expanded by statute, and that separation of powers does not require watertight compartments. She contended the audit would not displace core legislative powers because the auditor can only evaluate operations, report findings, and make recommendations. She also argued the Legislature itself already conducts audits of other branches, so it is inconsistent to claim an audit of the Legislature is unconstitutional. In response to senators’ questions, she said there are guardrails against truly intrusive requests, but that the administrative-versus-legislative distinction is not a workable bright line; she suggested disputes should be handled case by case, with objections, negotiation, or litigation if specific requests go too far. No votes or formal actions were taken at the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Legislative employees running for and holding elected office while temporary session staff are legislative
• amendments to the Legislative Council's legislative district office policy.
• for all legislative accounts and legislative staff.
• This change is necessary to protect legislators' personal accounts, legislative accounts, and the legislative
• Lastly, per legislative council policy, I am reporting that since the last legislative council meeting

Transcript Highlights:

• The companion legislation is Senate Bill 367.
• Legislation originally passed the House.
• Legislation originally passed the House.
• Speaker, House Bill 964 is the enabling legislation, sorry, is the enabling legislation for House Joint
• Legislation originally passed the House.

Keywords: March 06, 2026 - Regular Session, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For legislative pre-filing, like I said, that begins the first day of org session, and then legislator
• We get very few legislative prefiles.
• And for a legislator, I'm thinking of it, a legislator is the primary beneficiary of it.
• The 35th legislative day? Okay. Mr.
• Right now, it's the 40th legislative day.

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee first discussed security and member contact procedures, with several members emphasizing the need for formal security training at the start of each session and clearer procedures for knowing where legislators are staying during session for welfare checks and emergency contact. Members also raised concerns about the disclosure of home addresses in other public records and forms, and Legislative Council was asked to prepare a background memo on possible training, best practices, and related legislative or rule changes. The committee then took up a bill draft to reduce the number of paper copies of state publications sent to the State Library from eight to two. Legislative Council explained the cost savings and the move toward digital distribution, but the State Librarian testified that the library still needs paper copies for circulation, archives, and depository libraries, and requested a minimum of three copies. After discussion, the committee amended the draft to require three copies instead of two and passed the motion. The committee also approved a related House and Senate Rules amendment reducing the number of bound journals distributed, and a separate rule change removing the requirement that legislators’ home addresses be printed in the rule book and allowing a lower print run based on request and need. The committee next reviewed data on bill pre-filing and legislative workload. After hearing testimony that agency bills tend to arrive in a late-year rush and that staff workload is especially heavy around organizational session and the holidays, the committee voted to move the agency pre-filing deadline to the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. It also amended the deadline for constitutional amendments and study resolutions, moving them earlier so they would occur before crossover, and adjusted the reporting deadline accordingly. Members discussed whether these changes should be handled in special session or organizational session, and staff explained that the agency deadline change could be made effective for the next regular session through a permanent rules change. Finally, the committee reviewed proposed special session rules. Staff explained that the special session would use joint appropriations and joint policy committees, with expedited bill processing, limited bill introduction routes, and remote participation allowed for members and public testimony with approval. The committee also resolved a House appropriations membership issue by keeping the House side at 23 members and giving the House majority leader authority to appoint a replacement for the vacant seat, while increasing the Senate dollar threshold to match the House. Members then discussed the upcoming rural health special session process, including how the interim rural health group would differ from the actual special session committees, the timing of committee work and the governor’s address, and whether remote participation would be permitted in the special session.

Transcript Highlights:

• information that we get as legislators information that we get as legislators is<00:10:53.639>
• current Office of the legislative current Office of the legislative auditor<00:31:17.480> okay
• <00:32:37.000> auditor the office of the legislative auditor the office of the legislative
• <00:43:10.559> auditor realities that the legislative auditor realities that the legislative
• is pointing out so that the legislators is pointing out so that the legislators can't<00:43:13.680

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It establishes legislative compensation that's tied to New Mexicans' median household income, so legislators
• It establishes legislative compensation that's tied to New Mexicans' median household income, so legislators
• The hours you spend doing legislative work outside of the legislative session are long.
• The hours you spend doing legislative work outside of the legislative session are long.
• Being a legislator shouldn't be reserved for the 1%, nor should it force legislators to make financial

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• know it behooves us all as legislators know it behooves us all as legislators to<00:02:15.319>
• fiscal note in the 2024 legislative fiscal note in the 2024 legislative session<00:03:13.159>
• And finally, as we prepared for fiscal to come in during the 2024 legislative session, the Legislative
• legislation legislation um<00:05:10.759> and<00:05:11.000> finally<00:05:11.759> um
• legislative session uh the legislative legislative session uh the legislative budget<00:05:18.440

Bills: HF3

Keywords: legislative auditor, reporting, accountability, state finance, executive agency oversight, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• committees are exclusively legislators. committees are exclusively legislators.
• > legislative legislation to modify legislative legislation to modify legislative compensation
• oversight by legislators.
• oversight by legislators.
• oversight by legislators. oversight by legislators.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the legislator to push or advance the employer's legislative agenda or to oppose legislation disfavored
• Act does not prohibit a legislator from inducing, supporting, advocating, or voting for legislation
• Every legislator has... Every legislator has the ability to donate their campaign surplus accounts.
• As a legislator. As a legislator.
• And is it normal for you to call legislators and ask them about legislation? Yes.

Summary: The hearing opened in a Washington State Office of Administrative Hearings matter involving Legislative Ethics Board complaint 2025-5 against Representative Tara Simmons. The ALJ outlined the process, the issues on appeal, and the burden of proof, which centered on whether Simmons violated the Ethics Act by using her legislative position for others’ benefit and by holding outside employment that conflicted with her duties, and what sanction would be appropriate. Several exhibits were admitted by stipulation or without objection, while Exhibit 2 was initially held for later ruling but was ultimately admitted after testimony from the witness who prepared it. The board also granted a motion to sequester witnesses and took under advisement a motion to exclude three defense witnesses until after the staff case-in-chief. In opening statements, board staff alleged Simmons violated RCW 42.52.020 and RCW 42.52.070 by sponsoring a proviso that benefited her outside employer, Equity and Education Coalition (EEC), by using campaign surplus funds to help hire a friend, by intervening in a dispute over the proviso-funded work, and by sending text messages to influence others. Staff said it would seek penalties of up to $5,000 per violation plus costs. Defense counsel argued the allegations were technical ethics issues, denied Simmons profited personally, and contended the proviso funding her employer was permitted under prior board guidance; counsel also argued the campaign donation and later contract dispute were lawful and context-dependent. The first witness, Kimberly Gordon of American Equity and Justice Group (AEJG), testified that AEJG received state proviso funding and donations from Simmons, including $10,000 and later $40,000, which Gordon said were intended to fund the hiring of Antoine Coleman, Simmons’s romantic partner. Gordon said AEJG returned the donations and terminated Coleman after learning of the relationship and potential conflict of interest. She also testified about a later 2024 proviso involving EEC, a subcontract between AEJG and EEC, and a dispute over EEC’s performance under that subcontract. Gordon said AEJG raised concerns with the Administrative Office of the Courts, met with contract manager Chris Stanley, and ultimately rewrote the subcontract after Stanley, allegedly after speaking with Simmons, directed them to do so. The hearing then recessed for lunch, and cross-examination of Gordon was set to continue afterward.

Transcript Highlights:

• that all members have five legislative that all members have five legislative days<02:45:37.600>
• that all members have five legislative that all members have five legislative days<02:53:15.680>
• This legislation conveys 2025.
• this important legislation. this important legislation.
• Again, I support the legislation.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So if you see an area of interest... ...for legislation next time.
• To date, there is no comprehensive AI legislation that's been passed.
• There's a lot of great legislation out there right now.
• forth some legislation also went by the playbook as well.
• So, you know, like you said, ...have such legislation.

Keywords: Technology and Science, Joint Commission on, 976, house, all